No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
C-Peptide and Intima Media Thickness in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Pioglitazone
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between plasma C-peptide levels and intima media thickness (IMT) in type 2 diabetic patients. The Pioneer Study investigated the change in IMT in type 2 diabetic patients treated with either pioglitazone or glimepiride over six months. IMT was measured at the common carotid artery, and blood samples were taken for measuring glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and HbA1c levels. IMT declined from 0.949 ± 0.149 to 0.893 ± 0.144 mm (p < 0.05), while the HOMAIR score declined from 6.14 ± 4.3 to 3.84 ± 2.28 (p < 0.05), and C-peptide levels were reduced from 2.08 ± 0.90 to 1.69 ± 0.76 ng/ml (p < 0.05) during pioglitazone treatment. We observed a linear correlation between improvement in IMT and reduction in the HOMA IR score (r = 0.29; p < 0.05) and C-peptide levels (r = 0.17; p < 0.05).This study confirmed a linear relationship between IMT decrease and improvement in insulin sensitivity, and decline in plasma C-peptide levels.
Background:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing health problem worldwide. Whether sulphonylureas show better, equal or worse therapeutic effects in comparison with other antidiabetic interventions for patients with T2DM remains controversial.
Objectives:
To assess the effects of sulphonylurea monotherapy versus placebo, no intervention or other antidiabetic interventions for patients with T2DM.
Search methods:
We searched publications in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, LILACS and CINAHL (all until August 2011) to obtain trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria for our review.
Selection criteria:
We included clinical trials that randomised patients 18 years old or more with T2DM to sulphonylurea monotherapy with a duration of 24 weeks or more.
Data collection and analysis:
Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were other patient-important outcomes and metabolic variables. Where possible, we used risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to analyse the treatment effect of dichotomous outcomes. We used mean differences with 95% CI to analyse the treatment effect of continuous outcomes. We evaluated the risk of bias. We conducted trial sequential analyses to assess whether firm evidence could be established for a 10% relative risk reduction (RRR) between intervention groups.
Main results:
We included 72 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 22,589 participants; 9707 participants randomised to sulphonylureas versus 12,805 participants randomised to control interventions. The duration of the interventions varied from 24 weeks to 10.7 years. We judged none of the included trials as low risk of bias for all bias domains. Patient-important outcomes were seldom reported.First-generation sulphonylureas (FGS) versus placebo or insulin did not show statistical significance for all-cause mortality (versus placebo: RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.45; P = 0.15; 2 trials; 553 participants; high risk of bias (HRB); versus insulin: RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.59; P = 0.26; 2 trials; 1944 participants; HRB). FGS versus placebo showed statistical significance for cardiovascular mortality in favour of placebo (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.22; P = 0.006; 2 trials; 553 participants; HRB). FGS versus insulin did not show statistical significance for cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.71; P = 0.39; 2 trials; 1944 participants; HRB). FGS versus alpha-glucosidase inhibitors showed statistical significance in favour of FGS for adverse events (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.76; P = 0.01; 2 trials; 246 participants; HRB) and for drop-outs due to adverse events (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.67; P = 0.004; 2 trials; 246 participants; HRB).Second-generation sulphonylureas (SGS) versus metformin (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.58; P = 0.68; 6 trials; 3528 participants; HRB), thiazolidinediones (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.41; P = 0.70; 7 trials; 4955 participants; HRB), insulin (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.18; P = 0.72; 4 trials; 1642 participants; HRB), meglitinides (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.47 to 4.42; P = 0.52; 7 trials; 2038 participants; HRB), or incretin-based interventions (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.52 to 3.68; P = 0.51; 2 trials; 1503 participants; HRB) showed no statistically significant effects regarding all-cause mortality in a random-effects model. SGS versus metformin (RR 1.47; 95% CI 0.54 to 4.01; P = 0.45; 6 trials; 3528 participants; HRB), thiazolidinediones (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.55 to 3.07; P = 0.55; 7 trials; 4955 participants; HRB), insulin (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.28; P = 0.80; 4 trials; 1642 participants; HRB) or meglitinide (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.53; P = 0.97; 7 trials, 2038 participants, HRB) showed no statistically significant effects regarding cardiovascular mortality. Mortality data for the SGS versus placebo were sparse. SGS versus thiazolidinediones and meglitinides did not show statistically significant differences for a composite of non-fatal macrovascular outcomes. SGS versus metformin showed statistical significance in favour of SGS for a composite of non-fatal macrovascular outcomes (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.93; P = 0.02; 3018 participants; 3 trials; HRB). The definition of non-fatal macrovascular outcomes varied among the trials. SGS versus metformin, thiazolidinediones and meglitinides showed no statistical significance for non-fatal myocardial infarction. No meta-analyses could be performed for microvascular outcomes. SGS versus placebo, metformin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors or meglitinides showed no statistical significance for adverse events. SGS versus alpha-glucosidase inhibitors showed statistical significance in favour of SGS for drop-outs due to adverse events (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.96; P = 0.04; 9 trials; 870 participants; HRB). SGS versus meglitinides showed no statistical significance for the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. SGS versus metformin and thiazolidinediones showed statistical significance in favour of metformin (RR 5.64, 95% CI 1.22 to 26.00; P = 0.03; 4 trials; 3637 participants; HRB) and thiazolidinediones (RR 6.11, 95% CI 1.57 to 23.79; P = 0.009; 6 trials; 5660 participants; HRB) for severe hypoglycaemia.Third-generation sulphonylureas (TGS) could not be included in any meta-analysis of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or non-fatal macro- or microvascular outcomes. TGS versus thiazolidinediones showed statistical significance regarding adverse events in favour of TGS (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99; P = 0.03; 3 trials; 510 participants; HRB). TGS versus thiazolidinediones did not show any statistical significance for drop-outs due to adverse events. TGS versus other comparators could not be performed due to lack of data.For the comparison of SGS versus FGS no meta-analyses of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal macro- or microvascular outcomes, or adverse events could be performed.Health-related quality of life and costs of intervention could not be meta-analysed due to lack of data.In trial sequential analysis, none of the analyses of mortality outcomes, vascular outcomes or severe hypoglycaemia met the criteria for firm evidence of a RRR of 10% between interventions.
Authors' conclusions:
There is insufficient evidence from RCTs to support the decision as to whether to initiate sulphonylurea monotherapy. Data on patient-important outcomes are lacking. Therefore, large-scale and long-term randomised clinical trials with low risk of bias, focusing on patient-important outcomes are required.
C-Peptide is produced in beta-cells in the pancreas, and secreted into the blood stream in equimolar amounts with insulin. For a long time, C-peptide was considered as an important component in the biosynthesis of insulin, but otherwise believed to possess minimal biological activity. In the recent years, numerous studies demonstrated that lacking C-peptide in type 1 diabetic patients might exert an important role in the development of microvascular complications such as nephropathy or neuropathy. There is increasing evidence that the biological effects of C-peptide are, at least in part, mediated through the modulation of endothelial function and microvascular blood flow. In several tissues, an increase in microvascular and nutritional blood flow could be observed during substitution of physiological amounts of C-peptide. Recent studies confirmed that C-peptide stimulates endothelial NO release by the activation of Ca2+ calmodulin-regulated endothelial NO synthase. A restoration of Na+/K+-ATPase activity during C-peptide supplementation could be observed in erythrocytes and renal tubular cells. The improvement of erythrocyte Na+/K+-ATPase is associated with an increase in erythrocyte deformability, and improved rheological properties. In this article, we consider the role of C-peptide in the context of endothelial function and microvascular blood flow as pathophysiologic components in the development of microvascular complications in patients with diabetes mellitus and loss of beta-cell function.
To assess microcirculatory impairment and alterations of the skin oxygen supply in diabetic patients with foot at risk.
This study evaluated skin blood flow in 21 type 2 diabetic patients with a foot at risk (defined as a foot with neuropathy but without ulceration or previous ulcerations), 20 type 2 diabetic patients without foot lesions or neuropathy, and 21 normal subjects as a control group. The skin blood flow was determined by measuring the transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO(2)) at the dorsum of the foot in supine and sitting position. The clinical assessment included standard measures of peripheral and autonomic neuropathy, but peripheral vascular disease was excluded by Doppler ultrasound.
In supine position, TcPO(2) was significantly reduced (means +/- SE) in diabetic patients with foot at risk (6.04 +/- 0.52 kPa) compared with diabetic (7.14 +/- 0.43 kPa, P = 0.035) and nondiabetic (8.10 +/- 0.44 kPa, P = 0.01) control subjects. The sitting/supine TcPO(2) difference was higher in diabetic subjects with foot at risk (3.13 +/- 0.27 kPa) compared with both diabetic (2.00 +/- 0.18, P = 0.004) and nondiabetic (1.77 +/- 0.15 kPa, P = 0.0003) control subjects. The mean sitting/supine ratio was 1.70 +/- 0.12 in diabetic patients with foot at risk, 1.32 +/- 0.04 in diabetic control subjects, and 1.25 +/- 0.03 in nondiabetic control subjects (P = 0.007). The sitting/supine TcPO(2) ratio was negatively correlated with the heart rate variation coefficient at rest (r = -0.32, P = 0.044) and at deep respiration (r = -0.31, P = 0.046).
Our data indicate that skin oxygen supply is reduced in type 2 diabetic patients with foot at risk. This is probably due to an impaired neurogenic blood flow regulation and may contribute to capillary hypertension, followed by disturbed endothelial function leading to edema and skin damage of the foot. The determination of TcPO(2) appears to be a useful tool in screening type 2 diabetic patients for foot at risk.
Increased levels of C-peptide, a cleavage product of proinsulin, circulate in patients with insulin resistance and early type 2 diabetes, a high-risk population for the development of a diffuse and extensive pattern of arteriosclerosis. The present study examined the effect of C-peptide on CD4(+) lymphocyte migration, an important process in early atherogenesis. C-peptide stimulated CD4(+) cell chemotaxis in a concentration-dependent manner. This process involves pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins as well as activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI 3-K). Biochemical analysis showed that C-peptide induced recruitment of PI 3-K to the cell membrane as well as PI 3-K activation in human CD4(+) cells. In addition, antidiabetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-activating thiazolidinediones inhibited C-peptide-induced CD4(+) cell chemotaxis as well as PI 3-Kgamma activation. Finally, immunofluorescence staining of thoracic artery specimen of diabetic patients showed intimal CD4(+) cells in areas with C-peptide deposition. Thus, C-peptide might deposit in the arterial intima in diabetic patients during early atherogenesis and subsequently attract CD4(+) cells to migrate into the vessel wall.
Aims/hypothesis:
The aim of this analysis was to examine the long-term effects of pioglitazone or gliclazide addition to failing metformin monotherapy and pioglitazone or metformin addition to failing sulphonylurea monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods:
Two 2-year, randomised, multicentre trials were performed in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7.5-11% inclusive), who were receiving either metformin or a sulphonylurea at > or = 50% of the maximum recommended dose or at the maximum tolerated dose. In the first study, patients on metformin received add-on therapy with pioglitazone (15-45 mg/day, n = 317) or gliclazide (80-320 mg/day, n = 313). In the second study, patients on sulphonylurea therapy were randomised to receive add-on therapy with either pioglitazone (15-45 mg/day, n = 319) or metformin (850-2,550 mg/day, n = 320). HbA(1)c, fasting plasma glucose, insulin and lipids were investigated.
Results:
At week 104, the mean reduction from baseline in HbA(1)c was 0.89% for pioglitazone and 0.77% for gliclazide addition to metformin (p = 0.200). There was a statistically significant between-group difference for the change in mean fasting plasma glucose at week 104 (-1.8 mmol/l for pioglitazone vs -1.1 mmol/l for gliclazide, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in changes from baseline in glycaemic parameters for pioglitazone compared with metformin addition to sulphonylurea therapy. Whether added to metformin or sulphonylurea, pioglitazone caused significantly greater decreases in triglycerides and significantly greater increases in HDL cholesterol than the comparator regimens (p < or = 0.001). There were decreases in LDL cholesterol in the comparator groups and these were significantly different from the small changes observed with pioglitazone (p < 0.001). All treatment regimens were well tolerated. There were weight increases of 2.5 kg and 3.7 kg in the pioglitazone and 1.2 kg in the gliclazide add-on groups, and there was a mean decrease of 1.7 kg in the metformin add-on group.
Conclusions/interpretation:
As add-on therapy to existing sulphonylurea or metformin therapy, pioglitazone improved glycaemic control and this improvement was sustained over 2 years. Furthermore, there were potential benefits in terms of improvements in specific lipid abnormalities. This could offer an advantage over the addition of other oral agents in the long-term treatment of diabetes.
Proinsulin C-peptide is involved in several biological activities. However, the role of C-peptide in vascular smooth muscle cells is unclear. We therefore investigated its effects, in vascular smooth muscle cells in high-glucose conditions.
Rat aortic smooth muscle cells were cultured with 5.5 or 20 mmol/l glucose with or without C-peptide (1 to 100 nmol/l) for 3 weeks. Proliferation activities, the protein expression of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-beta receptor, the phosphorylation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, and glucose uptake were measured.
The proliferation activities increased approximately three-fold under high-glucose conditions (p<0.05). C-peptide suppressed hyperproliferation activities that were induced by high glucose. This happened in a dose-dependent manner from 1 to 100 nmol/l of C-peptide. C-peptide (10 and 100 nmol/l) inhibited the increased protein expression of PDGF-beta receptor and the phosphorylation of p42/p44 MAP kinases that had been induced by high glucose (p<0.05). Furthermore, 100 nmol/l of C-peptide augmented the impaired glucose uptake in the high-glucose conditions.
These observations suggest that C-peptide could prevent diabetic macroangiopathy by inhibiting smooth muscle cell growth and ameliorating glucose utilisation in smooth muscle cells. C-peptide may thus be a novel agent for treating diabetic macroangiopathy in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Patients with type 2 diabetes are at high risk of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke. There is indirect evidence that agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) could reduce macrovascular complications. Our aim, therefore, was to ascertain whether pioglitazone reduces macrovascular morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.
We did a prospective, randomised controlled trial in 5238 patients with type 2 diabetes who had evidence of macrovascular disease. We recruited patients from primary-care practices and hospitals. We assigned patients to oral pioglitazone titrated from 15 mg to 45 mg (n=2605) or matching placebo (n=2633), to be taken in addition to their glucose-lowering drugs and other medications. Our primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, non fatal myocardial infarction (including silent myocardial infarction), stroke, acute coronary syndrome, endovascular or surgical intervention in the coronary or leg arteries, and amputation above the ankle. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN NCT00174993.
Two patients were lost to follow-up, but were included in analyses. The average time of observation was 34.5 months. 514 of 2605 patients in the pioglitazone group and 572 of 2633 patients in the placebo group had at least one event in the primary composite endpoint (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.02, p=0.095). The main secondary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. 301 patients in the pioglitazone group and 358 in the placebo group reached this endpoint (0.84, 0.72-0.98, p=0.027). Overall safety and tolerability was good with no change in the safety profile of pioglitazone identified. 6% (149 of 2065) and 4% (108 of 2633) of those in the pioglitazone and placebo groups, respectively, were admitted to hospital with heart failure; mortality rates from heart failure did not differ between groups.
Pioglitazone reduces the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with type 2 diabetes who have a high risk of macrovascular events.
Diabetic macro- and microangiopathy are associated with a high risk of vascular complications. The diabetic patient exhibits a pathological coagulation state, with an increased synthesis of coagulation factors and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) as well as an enhanced aggregation of platelets. Previous studies have shown that C-peptide can reduce leucocyte-endothelial cell interaction and improve microvascular blood flow in patients with type 1 diabetes. In the present study, we examined in vivo whether C-peptide is able to reduce platelet activation and through that microvascular thrombus formation.
In the microvessels of cremaster muscle preparations taken from normal and diabetic mice, ferric chloride-induced thrombus formation was analysed using intravital fluorescence microscopy.
I.V. administration of C-peptide in high dose (70 nmol/kg), but not in low dose (7 nmol/kg), caused a significant delay in arteriolar and venular thrombus growth in normal and diabetic mice. This effect was repressed by cremaster muscle superfusion with insulin (100 microU/ml) in diabetic animals, but particularly in normal animals. In parallel, immunohistochemistry demonstrated a higher number of PAI-1-expressing vessels in cremaster muscle tissue from control animals and from animals treated with C-peptide and insulin compared with tissue from animals with C-peptide treatment application alone.
We conclude that C-peptide possesses antithrombotic actions in vivo. A causal role of PAI-1 in this scenario needs to be further addressed. However, the reversal of C-peptide action by insulin may invalidate the use of this peptide as a treatment option to improve rheology and microcirculation in diabetic patients.
No antidiabetic regimen has demonstrated the ability to reduce progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Commonly used oral glucose-lowering agents include sulfonylureas, which are insulin secretagogues, and thiazolidinediones, which are insulin sensitizers.
To compare the effects of an insulin sensitizer, pioglitazone, with an insulin secretagogue, glimepiride, on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial at 97 academic and community hospitals in North and South America (enrollment August 2003-March 2006) in 543 patients with coronary disease and type 2 diabetes.
A total of 543 patients underwent coronary intravascular ultrasonography and were randomized to receive glimepiride, 1 to 4 mg, or pioglitazone, 15 to 45 mg, for 18 months with titration to maximum dosage, if tolerated. Atherosclerosis progression was measured by repeat intravascular ultrasonography examination in 360 patients at study completion.
Change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) from baseline to study completion.
Least squares mean PAV increased 0.73% (95% CI, 0.33% to 1.12%) with glimepiride and decreased 0.16% (95% CI, -0.57% to 0.25%) with pioglitazone(P = .002). An alternative analysis imputing values for noncompleters based on baseline characteristics showed an increase in PAV of 0.64% (95% CI, 0.23% to 1.05%) for glimepiride and a decrease of 0.06% (-0.47% to 0.35%) for pioglitazone (between-group P = .02). Mean (SD) baseline HbA(1c) levels were 7.4% (1.0%) in both groups and declined during treatment an average 0.55% (95% CI, -0.68% to -0.42%) with pioglitazone and 0.36% (95% CI, -0.48% to -0.24%) with glimepiride (between-group P = .03). In the pioglitazone group, compared with glimepiride, high-density lipoprotein levels increased 5.7 mg/dL (95% CI, 4.4 to 7.0 mg/dL; 16.0%) vs 0.9 mg/dL (95% CI, -0.3 to 2.1 mg/dL; 4.1%), and median triglyceride levels decreased 16.3 mg/dL (95% CI, -27.7 to -11.0 mg/dL; 15.3%) vs an increase of 3.3 mg/dL (95% CI, -10.7 to 11.7 mg/dL; 0.6%) (P < .001 for both comparisons). Median fasting insulin levels decreased with pioglitazone and increased with glimepiride (P < .001). Hypoglycemia was more common in the glimepiride group and edema, fractures, and decreased hemoglobin levels occurred more frequently in the pioglitazone group.
In patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease, treatment with pioglitazone resulted in a significantly lower rate of progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared with glimepiride.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00225277.
Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) occurs more frequently in type 1 diabetes resulting in a more severe DPN. The differences in DPN between the two types of diabetes are due to differences in the availability of insulin and C-peptide. Insulin and C-peptide provide gene regulatory effects on neurotrophic factors with effects on axonal cytoskeletal proteins and nerve fiber integrity. A significant abnormality in type 1 DPN is nodal degeneration. In the type 1 BB/Wor-rat, C-peptide replacement corrects metabolic abnormalities ameliorating the acute nerve conduction defect. It corrects abnormalities of neurotrophic factors and the expression of neuroskeletal proteins with improvements of axonal size and function. C-peptide corrects the expression of nodal adhesive molecules with prevention and repair of the functionally significant nodal degeneration.
Cognitive dysfunction is a recognized complication of type 1 diabetes, and is associated with impaired neurotrophic support and apoptotic neuronal loss. C-peptide prevents hippocampal apoptosis and cognitive deficits. It is therefore clear that substitution of C-peptide in type 1 diabetes has a multitude of effects on DPN and cognitive dysfunction.
Here the effects of C-peptide replenishment will be extensively described as they pertain to DPN and diabetic encephalopathy, underpinning its beneficial effects on neurological complications in type 1 diabetes.
Insulin treatment is considered to be the final option for patients with progressive type 2 diabetes. This study investigated, whether reconverting type 2 patients from insulin treatment to oral treatment using pioglitazone is possible without deterioration of blood glucose control.
The PioSwitch study was a prospective, open label, proof of concept study. Thiazolidinedione-naïve patients with residual beta-cell function were switched from an existing insulin therapy to treatment with pioglitazone and glimepiride for 6 months. Efficacy was assessed by laboratory parameters and scores for evaluation of metabolic control, beta-cell function, insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk.
In total, 98 patients [66 men, 32 women, age (mean +/- s.d.): 59 +/- 9 years; disease duration: 5.6 +/- 3.6 years; Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 6.9 +/- 0.8%; body mass index (BMI): 33.9 +/- 5.2 kg/m(2), initial daily insulin therapy dose: 0.36 +/- 0.3 U/kg body weight] out of 117 screened patients were treated. During the observation period, 23 patients were prematurely terminated because of an increase in HbA1c from baseline > 0.5% or other reasons. In 75 patients (76%), no deterioration of glucose metabolism occurred and additional improvements were seen in the majority of the observation parameters [baseline vs. endpoint; HbA1c: 6.79 +/- 0.74%/6.66 +/- 0.69% (p < 0.05), glucose: 6.4 +/- 1.5/5.2 +/- 1.4 mmol/l (p < 0.001), adiponectin: 7 +/- 3 mg/l/17 +/- 8 mg/l (p < 0.001), C-peptide: 987 +/- 493/1756 +/- 789 (p < 0.001), sensitivity index derived from the intravenous glucose tolerance test (SI(ivGTT)): 1.21 +/- 0.85/1.49 +/- 0.95 (p < 0.05), hsCRP: 3.3 +/- 2.4/2.6 +/- 2.4 mg/l (p < 0.01), macrophage chemo-attractant protein 1 (MCP1): 487 +/- 246/382 +/- 295 ng/l (p < 0.05)]. BMI increased from 33.8 +/- 5.1 to 34.4 +/- 5.3 kg/m(2) (p < 0.001).
The switch from insulin therapy resulting in a moderately HbA1c level, to oral treatment with pioglitazone was successful in a majority of patients with sufficient residual beta-cell function. It allows a simple and less expensive therapy with a better cardiovascular risk marker profile.
Previous data from our group demonstrated that C-peptide induces chemotaxis of CD4-positive lymphocytes in-vitro, mediated by activation of G-protein and PI 3-kinase gamma, but additional signalling pathways involved in this process remained unexplored. In the present study we further analyze intracellular signalling pathways which lead to C-peptide-induced CD4-positive lymphocyte migration. We provide evidence that C-peptide-induced chemotaxis of CD4-positive lymphocytes is critically dependent on activation of Src-kinase and RhoA, Rac-1 and Cdc42 GTPases. Furthermore, C-peptide stimulates phosphorylation of PAK, LIMK and cofilin downstream of Rac-1 and Cdc42, leading to cofilin inactivation and actin filament stabilization. In addition, C-peptide induces ROCK kinase activity and MLC phosphorylation downstream of RhoA, thereby stimulating myosin mediated cell contraction. In contrast, C-peptide does not activate ERK1/2, p38 or Akt in CD4-positive lymphocytes. Our data support an active role of C-peptide in CD4-positive lymphocyte chemotaxis and elucidate molecular mechanisms in C-peptide-induced cell migration.
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a leading cause of chronic liver disease for which there is limited therapy available. Insulin sensitizing, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic properties of thiazolidinediones support their use in treating NASH. We have evaluated pioglitazone in the treatment of nondiabetic patients with NASH.
We randomized 74 nondiabetic patients (45 men; median age, 54 y) with histologically proven NASH to 12 months of standard diet, exercise, and either placebo or pioglitazone (30 mg/day). Sixty-one patients (30 placebo, 31 pioglitazone) had liver biopsies both at the beginning and the end of the study.
Compared with placebo, pioglitazone therapy was associated with an increase in weight (mean change, -0.55 vs +2.77 kg; P = .04) and a reduction in glucose (+0.4 vs -0.1 mmol/L; P = .02), HbA1c (+0.16% vs -0.18%; P = .006), insulin C peptide level (+42 vs -78 pmol/L; P = .02), alanine aminotransferase level (-10.9 vs -36.2 u/L; P = .009), gamma-glutamyltransferase level (-9.4 vs -41.2 u/L; P = .002), and ferritin (-11.3 vs -90.5 microg/L; P = .01). Histologic features including hepatocellular injury (P = .005), Mallory-Denk bodies (P = .004), and fibrosis (P = .05) were reduced in patients treated with pioglitazone compared with those in the placebo group.
Pioglitazone therapy over a 12-month period in nondiabetic subjects with NASH resulted in improvements in metabolic and histologic parameters, most notably liver injury and fibrosis. Larger extended trials are justified to assess the long-term efficacy of pioglitazone in this patient group.
In order to determine the possible influence of C-peptide on nerve function, 12 insulin-dependent diabetic (IDDM) patients with symptoms of diabetic polyneuropathy were studied twice under euglycaemic conditions. Tests of autonomic nerve function (respiratory heart rate variability, acceleration and brake index during tilting), quantitative sensory threshold determinations, nerve conduction studies and clinical neurological examination were carried out before and during a 3-h i.v. infusion of either C-peptide (6 pmol.kg-1.min-1) or physiological saline solution in a double-blind study. Plasma C-peptide concentrations increased from 0.11 +/- 0.02 to 1.73 +/- 0.04 nmol/l during C-peptide infusion. Clinical neurological examination quantitative sensory threshold evaluations and nerve conduction measurements failed to detect significant changes between C-peptide and saline study periods. Respiratory heart rate variability increased significantly from 13 +/- 1 to 20 +/- 2% during C-peptide infusion (p < 0.001), reaching normal values in five of the subjects; control studies with saline infusion did not alter the heart rate variability (basal, 14 +/- 2; saline, 15 +/- 2%). A reduced brake index value was found in seven patients and increased significantly during the C-peptide infusion period (4.6 +/- 1.0 to 10.3 +/- 2.2%, p < 0.05) but not during saline infusion (5.9 +/- 2 to 4.1 +/- 1.1%, NS). It is concluded that short-term (3-h) infusion of C-peptide in physiological amounts may improve autonomic nerve function in patients with IDDM.
Although several reports have suggested that calcium channel blockers may inhibit progression of atherosclerosis in animals, it is still controversial whether they have any clinically significant antiatherogenic action in humans. The measurement of intimal-medial thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery by B-mode ultrasound technique has been recognized as a powerful and noninvasive method to evaluate early atherosclerotic lesions. We investigated the effect of treatment with amlodipine, a powerful calcium channel blocker, on IMT. Twenty-two hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in a prospective open study. An amlodipine group (amlodipine, 5 mg; n = 11) and a control group receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 11) were studied before and 6 months after treatment. Amlodipine treatment caused a significant decrease in IMT compared with control (-0.052 +/- 0.017 vs. 0.011 +/- 0.021 mm; p < 0.05). Although the exact mechanisms remain to be elucidated, our preliminary result suggests that amlodipine has an antiatherogenic action in type 2 diabetes.
The aim of the study was to compare lispro (LP) and Insuman(R) (I) insulin in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy with respect to blood glucose control as expressed by the standard deviation of blood glucose (SD(BG) ) and HbA(1c) and to monitor the well-being (WBQ) and treatment satisfaction (DTSQ) parameters during such treatment. Forty-one IDDM patients who had used CSII for at least 6 months participated in an open-label, randomized, cross-over, multicenter study for 4 months (2 months LP and 2 months I or vice versa). Boluses with LP were given 5 min before each meal and with I 30 min before each meal. During LP administration compared with I, the SD(BG) of all blood glucose values (3.6 mmol/l vs. 3.9 mmol/l, p=0.012), as well as the SD(BG) of the postprandial, blood glucose values (3.6 mmol/l vs. 4.0 mmol/l, p=0.006), were significantly reduced. The HbA(1c) was significantly lower during LP administration (7.4% vs. 7.6%, p=0.047). The incidence of hypoglycemic events per 30 days (capillary blood glucose<3.0 mmol/l and/or symptoms) did not significantly differ between LP and I (9.7 vs. 8.0 per month, p=0.23). The total amount of daily insulin was slightly but significantly lower with LP, compared to I (38.0 IU vs. 40.3 IU, p=0.004). There was no treatment effects of LP compared to I concerning WBQ and DTSQ. It is concluded that in CSII therapy LP is superior to I with respect to the stability of blood glucose control, a lower HbA(1c), a less insulin requirement without increasing the frequency of hypoglycemia.
There is increasing evidence for biological functions of human C-peptide. Recently, we have described that proinsulin C-peptide increases nutritive capillary blood flow and restores erythrocyte deformability in type 1 diabetic patients, whereas it has no such effect in non-diabetic subjects. The aim of the current study was to elucidate cellular mechanisms of this vasodilator effect in vitro by measuring the nitric oxide (NO)-mediated increase of cGMP production in a RFL-6 reporter cell assay and by demonstrating endothelial calcium influx with the Fluo-3 technique. C-peptide increased the release of NO from endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) in bovine aortic endothelial cells in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. At physiological concentrations of C-peptide, endothelial NO production was more than doubled (208+/-12% vs control; p<0.001). The NO release was abolished by the inhibitor of NO synthase N(G)-nitro-L-arginine or when Ca(2+) was removed from the medium superfusing the endothelial cells. C-peptide stimulated the influx of Ca(2+) into endothelial cells. No change in Ser-1179 phosphorylation of eNOS was detected after 6.6nM C-peptide. C-peptide did not change eNOS mRNA levels after 1, 6 or 24h. These data indicate that C-peptide is likely to stimulate the activity of the Ca(2+)-sensitive eNOS by increasing the influx of Ca(2+) into endothelial cells. We suggest that this effect may contribute to the increase in skin and muscle blood flow previously demonstrated in human in vivo.
Increased levels of C-peptide, a cleavage product of proinsulin, circulate in patients with insulin resistance and early type 2 diabetes, a high-risk population for the development of a diffuse and extensive pattern of arteriosclerosis. This study tested the hypothesis that C-peptide might participate in atherogenesis in these patients.
We demonstrate significantly higher intimal C-peptide deposition in thoracic aorta specimens from young diabetic subjects compared with matched nondiabetic controls as determined by immunohistochemical staining. C-peptide colocalized with monocytes/macrophages in the arterial intima of artery specimen from diabetic subjects. In vitro, C-peptide stimulated monocyte chemotaxis in a concentration-dependent manner with a maximal 2.3+/-0.4-fold increase at 1 nmol/L C-peptide. Pertussis toxin, wortmannin, and LY294002 inhibited C-peptide-induced monocyte chemotaxis, suggesting the involvement of pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins as well as a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent mechanism. In addition, C-peptide treatment activated PI3K in human monocytes, as demonstrated by PI3K activity assays.
C-peptide accumulated in the vessel wall in early atherogenesis in diabetic subjects and may promote monocyte migration into developing lesions. These data support the hypothesis that C-peptide may play an active role in atherogenesis in diabetic patients and suggest a new mechanism for accelerated arterial disease in diabetes.
Accumulating evidence indicates that replacement of C-peptide in type 1 diabetes ameliorates nerve and kidney dysfunction, but the molecular mechanisms involved are incompletely understood. C-peptide shows specific binding to a G-protein-coupled membrane binding site, resulting in Ca(2+) influx, activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathways, and stimulation of Na(+), K(+)-ATPase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. This study examines the intracellular signalling pathways activated by C-peptide in human renal tubular cells.
Human renal tubular cells were cultured from the outer cortex of renal tissue obtained from patients undergoing elective nephrectomy. Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and Akt/protein kinase B (PKB) activation was determined using phospho-specific antibodies. Protein kinase C (PKC) and RhoA activation was determined by measuring their translocation to the cell membrane fraction using isoform-specific antibodies.
Human C-peptide increases phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt/PKB in a concentration- and time-dependent manner in renal tubular cells. The C-terminal pentapeptide of C-peptide is equipotent with the full-length C-peptide, whereas scrambled C-peptide has no effect. C-peptide stimulation also results in phosphorylation of JNK, but not of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. MEK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 blocks the C-peptide effect on ERK1/2 phosphorylation. C-peptide causes specific translocation of PKC isoforms delta and epsilon to the membrane fraction in tubular cells. All stimulatory effects of C-peptide were abolished by pertussis toxin. The isoform-specific PKC-delta inhibitor rottlerin and the broad-spectrum PKC inhibitor GF109203X both abolish the C-peptide effect on ERK1/2 phosphorylation. C-peptide stimulation also causes translocation of the small GTPase RhoA from the cytosol to the cell membrane. Inhibition of phospholipase C abolished the stimulatory effect of C-peptide on phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK and PKC-delta.
C-peptide signal transduction in human renal tubular cells involves the activation of phospholipase C and PKC-delta and PKC-epsilon, as well as RhoA, followed by phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and JNK, and a parallel activation of Akt.
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is a strong predictor of myocardial infarction and stroke.
We compared the effects of pioglitazone-based therapy (45 mg/d) and glimepiride-based treatment (2.7+/-1.6 mg/d) for 12 and 24 weeks on metabolic control (HbA1c), insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment), and carotid IMT (B-mode ultrasonography) in a randomized controlled study in 173 orally treated patients with type 2 diabetes (66 women, 107 men; mean+/-SD age, 62.6+/-7.9 years; body mass index, 31.8+/-4.6 kg/m2; HbA1c, 7.5+/-0.9%). Treatment was generally well tolerated in both groups. Despite similar improvements in metabolic control (HbA1c) after 24 weeks (-0.8+/-0.9% [pioglitazone] versus -0.6+/-0.8% [glimepiride]; P=NS), carotid IMT was reduced only in the pioglitazone group after 12 weeks (-0.033+/-0.052 versus -0.002+/-0.047 mm [glimepiride]; P<0.01 between groups) and 24 weeks (-0.054+/-0.059 versus -0.011+/-0.058 mm [glimepiride]; P<0.005 between groups). Insulin resistance was also improved only in the pioglitazone group (homeostasis model assessment, -2.2+/-3.4 versus -0.3+/-3.3; P<0.0001 between groups). Reduction of IMT correlated with improvement in insulin resistance (r=0.29, P<0.0005) and was independent of improvement in glycemic control (r=0.03, P=0.68).
We found a substantial regression of carotid IMT, independent of improved glycemic control, after 12 and 24 weeks of pioglitazone treatment. This finding may have important prognostic implications for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The role of intact proinsulin and adiponectin in endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance has been receiving increasing attention. This study investigates the effect of PPARgamma stimulation or beta-cell stimulation on metabolic and vascular parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. In our study, 173 type 2 diabetic patients were recruited and randomly assigned to pioglitazone 45 mg or glimepiride 1 - 6 mg treatment. Intima media thickness of the carotid artery, glycemic control, insulin resistance, adiponectin and intact proinsulin levels were assessed at baseline and after six months of treatment. Despite similar improvements in metabolic control (HbA (1c) after 24 weeks: - 0.8 +/- 0.9% [pioglitazone] vs. - 0.6 +/- 0.8% [glimepiride]; mean +/- SD; p < 0.0001, respectively), improvements in intima media thickness (- 0.033 +/- 0.052 mm; p < 0.0001), proinsulin intact (- 5.92 +/- 10.04 pmol/l; p < 0.0001), adiponectin (10.9 +/- 6.3 microg/ml; p < 0.0001) and HOMA score (- 2.21 +/- 3.40; p < 0.0001) were observed by pioglitazone but not glimepiride treatment. Reduction in intima media thickness was correlated with improved insulin sensitivity (r = 0.29; p = 0.0003), and proinsulin intact levels (r = 0.22; p = 0.006), while an inverse correlation was found with adiponectin levels (r = - 0.37; p < 0.0001). Measurement of adiponectin and intact proinsulin enables characterization of the metabolic situation and an estimation of atherosclerotic risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.
New scores and biochemical markers have recently been published for diagnosis of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction (such as intact proinsulin, adiponectin, IRISII-score). One goal of this 6-month prospective controlled study was to evaluate the impact of pioglitazone (45 mg) vs. glimepiride (1-6 mg, in the intend to optimize therapy) on these markers. Observation parameters were: IRIS-II score, HOMA-score, ATP III score, HbA (1c), fasting glucose, lipids, intact proinsulin, adiponectin, and adverse events. The study was completed by 173 patients (66 female, 107 male, age +/- STD: 63 +/- 8 years, disease duration: 7.2 +/- 7.2 years, HbA (1c): 7.53 +/- 0.85 %, pioglitazone arm: 89 patients). The groups were not different for any of the observation parameters at baseline, and a similar reduction in HbA (1c) was seen in both groups (p < 0.001). In the pioglitazone group, reductions were observed for the IRIS-II and HOMA scores (p < 0.001 vs. glimepiride at endpoint) fasting glucose (p < 0.001), insulin (p < 0.001), LDL/HDL ratio (p < 0.001), hsCRP (p < 0.05), intact proinsulin (p < 0.001), and an increase was seen in HDL (p < 0.001), adiponectin (p < 0.001) and BMI (p < 0.001). In conclusion, treatment with pioglitazone resulted in an improvement of markers for insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction, independent from blood glucose control. Adiponectin, intact proinsulin, and the IRIS-II score may be suitable parameters for monitoring of these additional beneficial therapeutic effects.
Complications associated with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type-1diabetes) primarily represent vascular dysfunction that has its origin in the endothelium. While many of the vascular changes are more accountable in the late stages of type-1diabetes, changes that occur in the early or initial functional stages of this disease may precipitate these later complications. The early stages of type-1diabetes are characterized by a diminished production of both insulin and C-peptide with a significant hyperglycemia. During the last decade numerous speculations and theories have been developed to try to explain the mechanisms responsible for the selective changes in vascular reactivity and/or tone and the vascular permeability changes that characterize the development of type-1diabetes. Much of this research has suggested that hyperglycemia and/or the lack of insulin may mediate the observed functional changes in both endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle. Recent studies suggest several possible mechanisms that might be involved in the observed decreases in vascular nitric oxide (NO) availability with the development of type-1 diabetes. In addition more recent studies have indicated a direct role for both endogenous insulin and C-peptide in the amelioration of the observed endothelial dysfunction. These results suggest a synergistic action between insulin and C-peptide that facilitates increase NO availability and may suggest new clinical treatment modalities for type-1 diabetes mellitus.
The study was performed to investigate the effect of improving metabolic control with pioglitazone in comparison to glimepiride on microvascular function in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2.
A total of 179 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to one treatment group. Metabolic control (HbA1c), insulin resistance (HOMA index), and microvascular function (laser Doppler fluxmetry) were observed at baseline and after 3 and 6 months.
HbA1c improved in both treatment arms (pioglitazone: 7.52 +/- 0.85% to 6.71 +/- 0.89%, p < .0001; glimepiride: 7.44 +/- 0.89% to 6.83 +/- 0.85%, p < .0001). Insulin-resistance decreased significantly in the pioglitazone group (6.15 +/- 4.05 to 3.85 +/- 1.92, p < .0001) and remained unchanged in the glimepiride group. The microvascular response to heat significantly improved in both treatment groups (pioglitazone 48.5 [15.2; 91.8] to 88.8 [57.6; 124.1] arbitrary units [AU], p < .0001; glimepiride 53.7 [14.1; 91.9] to 87.9 [52.9, 131.0] AU, p < .0001, median [lower and upper quartile]). Endothelial function as measured with the acetylcholine response improved in the pioglitazone group (38.5 [22.2; 68.0] to 60.2 [36.9; 82.8], p = .0427) and remained unchanged in the glimepiride group.
Improving metabolic control has beneficial effects in microvascular function in type 2 diabetic patients. Treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with pioglitazone exerts additional effects on endothelial function beyond metabolic control.
C-peptide replacement in animals results in amelioration of diabetes-induced functional and structural abnormalities in peripheral nerves. The present study was undertaken to examine whether C-peptide administration to patients with type 1 diabetes and peripheral neuropathy improves sensory nerve function.
This was an exploratory, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled study with three study groups that was carried out at five centers in Sweden. C-peptide was given as a replacement dose (1.5 mg/day, divided into four subcutaneous doses) or a dose three times higher (4.5 mg/day) during 6 months. Neurological examination and neurophysiological measurements were performed before and after 6 months of treatment with C-peptide or placebo.
The age of the 139 patients who completed the protocol was 44.2 +/- 0.6 (mean +/- SE) years and their duration of diabetes was 30.6 +/- 0.8 years. Clinical neurological impairment (NIA) (score >7 points) of the lower extremities was present in 86% of the patients at baseline. Sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) was 2.6 +/- 0.08 SD below body height-corrected normal values at baseline and improved similarly within the two C-peptide groups (P < 0.007). The number of patients responding with a SCV peak potential improvement >1.0 m/s was greater in C-peptide-treated patients than in those receiving placebo (P < 0.03). In the least severely affected patients (SCV < 2.5 SD below normal at baseline, n = 70) SCV improved by 1.0 m/s (P < 0.014 vs. placebo). NIA score and vibration perception both improved within the C-peptide-treated groups (P < 0.011 and P < 0.002). A1C levels (7.6 +/- 0.1% at baseline) decreased slightly but similarly in C-peptide-and placebo-treated patients during the study.
C-peptide treatment for 6 months improves sensory nerve function in early-stage type 1 diabetic neuropathy.
This analysis from the PROactive (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events) study assesses the effects of pioglitazone on mortality and macrovascular morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes and a previous myocardial infarction (MI).
People with type 2 diabetes have an increased incidence of MI compared with the general population. Those with diabetes and MI have a worse prognosis than nondiabetic patients with cardiovascular disease.
The PROactive study was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 5,238 patients with type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease. Patients were randomized to either pioglitazone or placebo in addition to their other glucose-lowering and cardiovascular medication. Treatment of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension was encouraged according to the International Diabetes Federation guidelines. Patients were followed for a mean of 2.85 years. The primary end point was the time to first occurrence of macrovascular events or death. Of the total cohort, the subgroup of patients who had a previous MI (n = 2,445 [46.7%]; n = 1,230 in the pioglitazone group and n = 1,215 in the placebo group) was evaluated using prespecified and post-hoc analyses.
Pioglitazone had a statistically significant beneficial effect on the prespecified end point of fatal and nonfatal MI (28% risk reduction [RR]; p = 0.045) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (37% RR; p = 0.035). There was a 19% RR in the cardiac composite end point of nonfatal MI (excluding silent MI), coronary revascularization, ACS, and cardiac death (p = 0.033). The difference in the primary end point defined in the main PROactive study did not reach significance in the MI population (12% RR; p = 0.135). The rates of heart failure requiring hospitalization were 7.5% (92 of 1,230) with pioglitazone and 5.2% (63 of 1,215) with placebo. Fatal heart failure rates were similar (1.4% [17 of the 92] with pioglitazone versus 0.9% [11 of the 63] with placebo).
In high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes and previous MI, pioglitazone significantly reduced the occurrence of fatal and nonfatal MI and ACS. (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00174993?order = 1; ISRCTN NCT00174993).
We investigated MMP-9 levels and inflammatory markers during pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease. In this randomized multicenter, double blinded, placebo controlled study, 92 type 2 diabetic patients with angiographically proven CHD were randomly assigned to pioglitazone or placebo treatment. At baseline and during a 28 days observational period MMP-9, MCP1, hsCRP, IL-6, sCD40, and P-selectin were monitored. During Pioglitazone treatment, a 12% reduction in MMP-9 and a 18% reduction in hsCRP levels (p<0.05, respectively) could be observed already after 3 days. MCP-1 levels were reduced by 14% after 10 days of treatment (p<0.0001). At the end of the study, these parameters were significantly lower in the pioglitazone group as compared to the placebo group (MMP-9: 392+/-286 versus 427+/-166 ng/ml; hsCRP: 1.9+/-1.7 versus 3.1+/-2.3 ng/L; MCP-1: 413+/-115 versus 471+/-146 pg/ml; p<0.05, respectively). sCD40 levels decreased by 32.5% (p<0.05) and P-selectin decreased by 3.2% (p=0.053) in the pioglitazone group. No change could be found with regard to the other study endpoints. No changes in these parameters could be observed during placebo treatment. Even before effects on glucose metabolism could be obtained, pioglitazone exerts immediate effects on plasma markers of plaque vulnerability and inflammation.
Excessive proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) is one of the primary lesions in atherosclerosis development during diabetes. High glucose triggers VSMC proliferation and initiates activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB. Recently, clinical studies have demonstrated that replacement therapy with C-peptide, a cleavage product of insulin, to type 1 diabetic (T1D) patients is beneficial on a variety of diabetes-associated vascular complications. However, the mechanisms underlying the beneficial activity of C-peptide on the vasculature in conditions of hyperglycemia are largely unknown. The effects of C-peptide on the proliferation of human umbilical artery smooth muscle cell (UASMC) and aortic smooth muscle cell (AoSMC) lines cultured under high glucose for 48 h were tested. To gain insights on potential intracellular signaling pathways affected by C-peptide, we analyzed NF-kappaB activation in VSMCs since this pathway represents a key mechanism for the accelerated vascular disease observed in diabetes. High glucose conditions (25 mmol/L) stimulated NF-kappaB-dependent VSMC proliferation since the addition of two NF-kappaB-specific inhibitors, BAY11-7082 and PDTC, prevented proliferation. C-peptide at the physiological concentrations of 0.5 and 1 nmol/L decreased high glucose-induced proliferation of VSMCs that was accompanied by decreased phosphorylation of IkappaB and reduced NF-kappaB nuclear translocation. These results suggest that in conditions of hyperglycemia C-peptide reduces proliferation of VSMCs and NF-kappaB nuclear translocation. In patients with T1D, physiological C-peptide levels may exert beneficial effects on the vasculature that, under high glucose conditions, is subject to progressive dysfunction.