Velocity measurements with Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) in the collector channel of Ancoa Reservoir's physical model are contrasted with LES numerical simulation results. In order to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of the numerical model in highly turbulent flows, times series of velocity fields, Reynolds stress (′ ′ ̅̅̅̅̅̅) and energy spectral density are compared. LES calculations were developed in OpenFOAM free software and a wall adapting local eddy viscosity (WALE) model was used. The ADV data have been filtered in order to get rid of the spikes in the velocity signal due to the air bubble presence. The analysis was carried out for a constant discharge of 761 m 3 /s in prototype, corresponding to floods with a return period of 1.000 years. The results show that LES numerical model predicts well the average turbulent flow variables, but those associated with turbulent fluctuations are not satisfactory. 1 INTRODUCTION In the field of hydraulic design, complex situations are usually validated through physical models. However, due to the high cost of laboratory experiments and the current computational advance, researchers have attempted to use numerical simulation along with physical modeling (Dehdar-behbahani & Parsaie, 2016). Recently, the tendency to use physical and numerical models jointly can be applied in different ways. For instance, it can be used in the early design stages, where numerical modeling can provide boundary conditions for physical models, or in later stages, as a design tool to explore several solution alternatives. This kind of modeling is referred to by some authors as hybrid modeling or composite modeling (Kamphuis 1995, Kamphuis 1996 and Ettema et al. 2000). A common factor to this approach is the need to validate CFD models with the data collection of the physical models (Hager & Boes, 2014). In this context of hybrid modeling, the National Institute of Hydraulics in Chile (INH) and the University of Chile, have developed a study to improve the design of the spillway of the Ancoa reservoir, located almost 300 km south of Santiago. To do this, a physical model of the existing structure was built at 1:40 Froude scale. Also, a numerical model was used to test different alternatives in order to decrease the high flow agitation in the collector channel. To implement the numerical model, the open source OpenFOAM software was used. In particular, the solver interFoam can handle incompressible two-phase flow problems by applying an interface capturing technique based on a modified volume of fluid (VoF) approach. On the treatment of turbulence, the Reynolds average equations (RANS) were initially used, but early comparisons between the physical and numerical model showed that the free surface in the collector channel was not well reproduced by RANS, making it necessary to improve the numerical model. For this reason, an increase in the grid resolution and a different treatment of the turbulence was implemented. In this case, the idea was to capture the flow separation in the lateral spillway in a better way than RANS, using a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) approach (Spalar 2009, Rodi et al. 2013 and Thorsten 2014). Finally, the numerical model was in agreement with the punctual values of the surface elevation (Negrete et al., 2015). Later, a more rigorous analysis of time series of hydrodynamic parameters, surface elevation and pressure, was made to evaluate and validate the numerical model. The results showed a good agreement, in particular, the free surface showed a better result than the pressure, which had a range of error in the average pressure of 3-18% (Negrete et al., 2016). Similar results are obtained by other authors in similar cases, for example, Sánchez-Cordero et al. (2018) who used OpenFoam for the analysis of a dam-break in a 3D numerical model, using VOF method and LES. In similar applications, there are no results related to the velocity in order to make a comparison. In this study, a comparison between velocity measurements taken with an Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) and the results of the numerical model with LES and WALE subgrid model is shown. ADV is an instrument