... Simulation (21) SPS and Micropas 10 (25.0%) (Ko et al., 2015a;McPherson et al., 2011McPherson et al., , 1988McPherson and Rowntree, 1993;McPherson and Simpson, 2003;Sawka et al., 2013;Simpson, 2002Simpson, , 1998McPherson, 1998, 1996) DOE-2 6 (15.0%) (Akbari, 2002;Akbari and Taha, 1992;Huang et al., 1987;Rosenfeld et al., 1998Rosenfeld et al., , 1998) SOLEST 2 (5.0%) (Thayer and Maeda, 1985;Thayer et al., 1983) EnergyPlus 2 (5.0%) (Hwang et al., 2017(Hwang et al., , 2016) ESP-r 1 (2.5%) (Nikoofard et al., 2011) Empirical (19) Statistical analysis 12 (30.0%) (Abbott and Meentemeyer, 2005;Clark and Berry, 1995;Donovan and Butry, 2009;Jensen et al., 2003;Kliman and Comrie, 2004;Ko and Radke, 2014;Láveme and Lewis, 1996;Nelson et al., 2012;Pandit and Laband, 2010b,a;Wilson, 2013) Experiments 5 (12.5%) (Akbari et al., 1997;Laband and Sophocleus, 2009;Mattingly et al., 1979;McPherson et al., 1989;Parker, 1983 (2009) used a statistical analysis of empirical data, employing summer household electricity consumption data, and found a 2.3% summer electricity reduction by a residential yard tree (82 kW h, equivalent to an average 20.5 kW h per month in summer) and a 5.2% reduction by multiple trees planted in the west and south of an average single family house in Sacramento, California (185 kW h, equivalent to an average 46.3 kW h per month in summer). ...