Development and Validation of Nunchi Scale

Full text

- -
. (1990)
.
.
189 14
. 12
2 .
. ,
,
.
. .
(Corresponding Author): / / (702-701) 80
Tel: 053-950-5246 / E-mail: oshoheo@knu.ac.kr
상 담 학 연 구

상담학연구
(Matusumoto & Juang, 2004).
( , , 2007; ,
, 2007; , 2007; ,
, 2007).
,
.
,
( , 1985; , 1979;
, 1971; , 1981; , 1983; ,
1976 ).
. (1990)
(1989)
. ‘
’ ‘ ’
‘ ’ ‘
’, ‘
’, ‘
’ ‘ ’
‘
’, ‘
’, ‘
’
. .92
‘ ’
.87, ‘ ’ .85 .
( , 2003; ,
2009), .
. (1990)
(1989)
. (1989)
( , 1999; , , 2012).
.
.
.
‘ ’ ‘
’ .
,
.
.
.

(1989)
, (2012)
(1990)
.
(2012)
(1989) ,
.
.
‘ ’
( , , )
. ‘
’
.
‘
( , , )
’ .
(2012)
(1989) .
,
(1989) ‘ ’ ‘
’
(2012) ‘ ’ .
‘ ’
(1989) .
( , 1979; , 1981
),
.
( ,
1985; , 1976) ‘ ’
‘ ’
. ‘ ’
.
(1989)
‘ ’
(2012) ‘ ’
. .
(1989) ‘ ’
‘ ’ ‘ ’
.
(2012) ‘
’ ‘ ’,
‘ ’
‘
‘ ’
. ’ ‘
.
(2012) ‘ ’
.
(1990)
(2012) .
.

상담학연구
.
(2012)
‘ ( , ,
)
’ .
. ‘ ’, ‘ ’
‘ ’
‘ ’ ‘ ’
‘ ’ .
‘ ’
( , , 2012).
,
( )
.
Triandis(1995) ‘ -
’ .
(Nisbett & Masuda, 2003; Oyserman, Coon, &
Kennelmeier, 2002).
.
.
(
, 2003).
( , 2003).
(Hall, 1976),
(Gudykunst, Gao, Nishida, & Franklyn-
Stokes, 1992), .
(Hall 1976),
.
, ,
(Hall & Hall, 1990).
(Gudykunst, Matsumoto, Ting-Toomey,
Nishida, Kim, & Heyman, 1996),
.
.
(Kitayama, Markus, Matsumoto, &
Norasakkunkit, 1997).

( , 2003),
(Diener & Diener, 1995; Heine & Lehman, 1995;
Kwan, Bond, & Singelis, 1997).
.
(Diener & Diener, 1995; Lucas, Diener, & Suh, 1996),
(( ,
2009a, 2009b, 2011, 2012a, 2012b; ,
2008; Kwan, Bond, & Singelis, 1997; Yetim, 2003).
‘ ’ ‘ ’
.
Baron-Cohen
(Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright, 2004)
. Baron-Cohen
( , , , , ,
, , , 2008).
.
.
.
.
.
.
2012 1
180 .
4 176
. 84 (47.7%)
91 (51.7%)
1 .
4 2 , 2
10
. 42 .
2012 2
350
.
331 .
145 (43.8%) , 182
(55.0%). 4
(1.2%). 23.5 (SD=3.58)
22.9 (SD=5.26) .
2013 1
200
.

상담학연구
189 . 80 (42.3%)
, 109 (57.7%) .
22.6 (SD=2.6) , 22.3
(SD=3.1) .
(Nunchi Scale)
,
(2012)
‘ ( , )
’
.
189
. 189
.
5 (1 : 5 :
) .
3 77 .
77
.
. 77
14
.
(INDividualism and COLlectivism
scale)
Singelis, Triandis, Bhawuk Gelfand (1995)
(1996) Kim Kim (1997)
.
- , - ,
- , -
. -
-
- -
. 7
, 8 32
.
- -
. (1996)
Kim & Kim(1997)
(Cronbach's
α
) - .68, -
.75 , -
.66, - .74
.78 .
(High Context Communication
Scale)
Ohashi(2000)
.
. 7 7
. Ohashi
(2000) (Cronbach’s
α
) .70
(Cronbach’s
α
) .71
.
(Self-esteem Scale)
Rosenberg
(1965) (1995)

. 5 5
, 10 7
. (1995)
(Cronbach's
α
) .89
(Cronbach's
α
) .88 .
(Satisfaction with Life Scale)
Diener, Emmons, Larsen
Griffin(1985)
(Satisfaction with Life Scale) .
(1996) 7
5
. -
.72 (Cronbach's
α
)
.82 .
(Empathy Quotient: EQ)
Baron-Cohen
Wheelwright(2004)
(2010) K-EQ .
17 4
. , ,
.
(2010) (Cronbach's
α
) .83
.82 .
(Interpersonal Relationship Scale)
Schlein Guerney(1971)
(1980) (1994)
. 5
25 .
, , , , ,
.
(Cronbach's
α
) .88
(Cronbach's
α
) .83 .
189 .
180
77 . 4
14
.
.
.
.
.
.
, ,
, ,
.
.
15 .
(Cronbach's
α
)
-
. SPSS 15.0
.

상담학연구
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
189
14 1 ( 1).
1 2
2 .
1 1 -.269,
2 -.197 14
1 .421, 2
.438 1 2
.1 . .1
. 1
14 12
. 2
. .348(4 5 )
.742(12 ) . 1 6.4
42.7% 2
1.4 6.9%
. 49.6%
( 2).
(Cronbach's
α
) .
(Cronbach's
α
) .90
. - .36(14 ) .78(6 )

communalities
1
2
13
.868
.214
.799
12
.782
.174
.642
10
.763
.353
.707
11
.758
.295
.661
9
.738
.333
.656
4
.560
.280
.393
7
.498
.342
.365
1
-.269
-.197
.111
8
.357
.675
.583
2
.281
.669
.527
3
.299
.601
.450
6
.133
.569
.342
5
.165
.560
.341
14
.421
.438
.368
Eigenvalues
6.4
1.4
Explained
variance(%)
42.7
6.9
Accumulated
variance(%)
42.7
49.6
-
1
.616
.853
2
.644
.851
3
.652
.850
4
.640
.858
5
.528
.858
6
.676
.848
7
.697
.848
8
.748
.841
9
.789
.840
10
.701
.841
11
.700
.844
12
.765
.840
.(.36 .78, <.001)( 3).
.
. 1 2
2
. 1 5.0
38.0% 2
2.5 17.9%
. 56.0% (
4).
NFI=.902, TLI=.915, CFI=
.942, RMSEA=.081 .
1 1 7

상담학연구
_
1
.830
2
.872
3
.607
4
.737
5
.683
6
.533
7
.766
_
8
.736
9
.852
10
.713
11
.729
12
.648
Eigenvalues
7.6
Explained variance
56.0
1 ‘ _ ’ ,
2
2
‘ _ ’ ( 4).
.
, ,
.
(r=-.337, .001),
(r=-.341, .001).
(r=-.643, .001),
(r=-.092,

.05).
6 ( 5).
.
.
,
,
. 1
2
.
19% 12%
.
.
1%
10%
.
( 6).

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
.242**
3
.861***
.702***
4
.143
.437***
.337***
5
.305**
.223*
.341***
.291**
6
.725***
.211*
.643***
.187*
.344***
7
-.003
.178
.092
.318**
.046
.051
1: _ , 2: _ , 3: _ , 4: , 5: , 6: , 7:
**
p
< .01, ***
p
< .001
B
SE
β


Δ


1
.839
.176
.431***
.19
.19***
.001
.134
.001
2
.368
.198
.189
.31
.12***
-.092
.127
-.062
.439
.103
.433***
1
.076
.114
.066
.01
.01
-.085
.090
-.093
2
-.193
.133
-.168
.11
.10**
-.141
.087
-.155
.253
.072
.408**
*
p
< .05, **
p
< .01, ***
p
< .001
(Cronbach's
α
)
.87 . _
.88 _ .86 .
- .48(12 ) .79(4 )
.(.4

상담학연구
-
_
1
.616
.853
2
.644
.851
3
.652
.850
4
.640
.858
5
.528
.858
6
.676
.848
7
.697
.848
_
8
.748
.841
9
.789
.840
10
.701
.841
11
.700
.844
12
.765
.840
8 .79, <.001)( 7).
.
.
(
, , Chu, Kim, & Sherman, 2009) ‘
±1SD’ (Aiken & West, 1991; Cohen
& Cohen, 1983), 1SD
,
1SD
.
19 ( : 9 , : 10 ),
18 ( : 12
, : 6 ).
22.4 ( =2.42)
22.3 (
=2.89) .
, ,
.
, ,
( 8).

56.7(8.84)
n
=19
22.6(6.02)
n
=19
100.4(7.53)
n
=18
43.4(10.80)
n
=17
17.8(4.6)
n
=18
83.1(9.31)
n
=16
t-
4.1***
2.7*
6.0***
**
p
< .01, ***
p
< .001
.
(1990)
.
.
189
3
77 .
. 14
14
.
. 1
14
.
12
. 12
1
2
. 1
‘ _ ’ 2 ‘ _
’ .
.90
.87 . _
.89, _ .86 .
.
( , 2012)
. (self)
.
‘ ’ .(Nisbett
& Masuda, 2003),
.
‘ ’ ,
(Triandis, McCusker, & Hui, 1990; Schwartz, 1994),

상담학연구
( , , , )
,
(Hall & Hall, 1990; Triandis,
1995).
.
.
.
(Gudykunst, Gao,
Nishida, Nadamitsu, & Sakai, 1992),
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
,
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
.

.
, ‘ ’ ‘ ’
.
‘ _ ’ ‘ _ ’
‘ ’ , ‘ _ ’ ‘
_ ’ ‘ ’
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
12 .
.
.
.
, , , , , ,
, , (2008).
.
(4), 43-57.
(1996).
. .
(1996).
. .
(1980).
.
195-204.
(1985).
- -
. .
, (2009).
: , ,
.
(2), 329-343.
(1979). : .
(1971). :
.
(2003),
.
.

상담학연구
(1981).
: .
, , (2007). ;
.
(3), 539-567.
, , Chu, T., Kim, H., Sherman, D. K.
(2009). :
. (1),
131-146.
, , (2007). ;
.
(3), 587-607.
, (1995). ,
. (1),
83-94.
(2007) ;
.
(3), 523-537.
(1994).
. .
(2003). : .
, (2010).
.
(11), 140-159.
, , (2007). ;
-
- -.
(3), 569-586.
(1983).
.
, (1989).
, 212-221.
, (1990).
, 293-302.
(1976). :
.
(1999).
1999 , 103-127.
(2009a).
:
.
(2), 39-54.
(2009b).
.
(4), 1769-1782.
, (2010).
. 183-200.
(2011).
.
(1), 99-113.
(2012a).
-
-. (1), 31-46.
(2012b).
. (5), 2049-2062.
(2008).
.
(4)
,
1475-1487.
, , (2012). .
557-581.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991).
Multiple regression:
Testing and interpreting interactions
. Newbury Park:
Sage.
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The
empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with

asperger syndrome or high functioning autism,
and normal sex differences.
Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorder, 34
, 163-175.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983).
Applied multiple
regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
(2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-Cultural
Correlates of Life Satisfaction and Self-Esteem.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68
(4),
653-663.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin,
S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale.
Journal
of Personality Assessment 49,
71-75.
Gudykunst, W. B., Gao, G., & Franklyn-Stokes, A.
(1996). Self-monitoring and concern for social
appropriateness in China and England. In J.
Pandy, D. Sinha, & D. Bhawuk (Eds.).
Asian
contribution to cross-cultural psychology
(pp.25-267).
New Delhi: Sage.
Gudykunst, W. B., Gao, G., Nishida, T., Nadamitsu,
Y., & Sakai, J. (1992). Self-monitoring in Japan
and the United States. In S. Iwawaki, Y.
kashima, & K. Leung (Eds.).
Innovations in
cross-cultural psycholog
y(pp.185-194). Amsterdam:
Swets & Zeitlinger.
Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S.,
Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The
infuluence of cultural individualism-collectivism,
self-construals, and individual values on
communication styles across cultures.
Human
Communication Research, 22,
510-543.
Hall E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990).
Understanding
cultural differences: Germans, French and Americans
.
Intercultural Press,
Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural
variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West
feel more invulnerable than the East?
Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 68
, 595-607.
Kim, K., & Kim, U. (1997). Conflict, ingroup and
outgroup distinction and mediation: Comparison of
Korean and American students. In K. Leung, U.
Kim, S. Yamaguchi, & Y. Kashima (Eds),
Progress
in Asian social Psychology
(Vol 1, pp.247-259).
Singapore: Wiley.
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., &
Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and
collective process of self-esteem management:
Self-enhancement in the United States and
self-criticism in Japan.
Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 72,
1245-1267.
Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M.
(1997). Pancultural Explanations for Life
Satisfaction: Adding Relationship Harmony to
Self-Esteem.
Journal of Personality
&
Social
Psychology. 73(5)
, 1038-1051.
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1996).
Discriminant validity of well-being measures.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71
,
616-628.
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2004).
Culture and
Psychology
. Thomson & Wadsworth.
Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003).
Culture and point
of view
. http://www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.
1934527100.
Ohashi, R. (2000).
High/low-context communication:
conceptualization and scale development.
Doctoral
dissertation. Michigan State University.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M.
(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism:
evaluation of theoretical assumptions and

상담학연구
meta-analyses.
Psychological Bulletin, 128
.(1), 3-72.
Rosenberg, M. (1965).
Society and the adolescent
self-image
. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press.
Schlein, A., & Guerney, B. G. (1971).
Relationship
enhancement.
SanFrancisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in
the content and structure of values?
Journal of
Social Issues, 50
, 19-45.
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. D., &
Gelfand, M. (1995). Horizontal and vertical
dimension of individualism and collectivism: A
theoretical and measurement refinement.
Cross-
Cultural Research, 29,
240-275.
Triandis, H. C. (1995).
Individualism and collectivism.
Boulder, CO: Westview.
Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990).
Multimethod probes of individualism and
collectivism.
Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 59
, 1006-1020.
Yetim, U. (2003). The impacts of individualism/
collectivism, self-esteem, and feeling of mastery on
life satisfaction among the turkish university
students and academicians.
Social Indicators Research.
61(3)
, 297-317.
: 2013. 00. 00.
: 2013. 00. 00.
: 2013. 00. 00.

Development and Validation of Nunchi Scale
Kyungpook National University Georgia State University
The aim of this study was to develop a scale of measuring
nunchi
and validating it. Choi and Choi(1990)
developed nunchi sensitivity scale, however, it had limitations that did not measure nunchi. which called for a
new scale for nunchi. 189 items were initially developed based on literatures, and 14 items was finally selected
by the rating of college students and licensed counselors. Exploratory analysis revealed that 12 items were proper,
and confirmatory analysis confirmed that nunchi had 12 items and two factors. Nuchi scale was also validated
by concurrent validity and reliability. The group with high nunchi level have higher level of self-esteem,
subjective wellbeing, and interpersonal relationship than the group with middle or low level of nunchi. Nunchi
affected subjective wellbeing in the mediation of self esteem, which confirmed that Nunchi was one of the
important factors in Korean culture. Results was discussed.
Key words : nunchi, development of scale
상 담 학 연 구