BookPDF Available

Geometry in a Frechet Context: A Projective Limit Approach

Authors:

Abstract

Many geometrical features of manifolds and fibre bundles modelled on Fréchet spaces either cannot be defined or are difficult to handle directly. This is due to the inherent deficiencies of Fréchet spaces; for example, the lack of a general solvability theory for differential equations, the non-existence of a reasonable Lie group structure on the general linear group of a Fréchet space, and the non-existence of an exponential map in a Fréchet–Lie group. In this book, the authors describe in detail a new approach that overcomes many of these limitations by using projective limits of geometrical objects modelled on Banach spaces. It will appeal to researchers and graduate students from a variety of backgrounds with an interest in infinite-dimensional geometry. The book concludes with an appendix outlining potential applications and motivating future research.
Geometry in a Fechet Context:
A Projective Limit Approach
by
C.T.J. Dodson
University of Manchester,
Manchester, UK
George Galanis
Hellenic Naval Academy,
Piraeus, Greece
Efstathios Vassiliou
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens,
Athens, Greece
Contents
Preface page vii
1 Banach manifolds and bundles 1
1.1 Banach manifolds 1
1.2 Banach-Lie groups 7
1.3 Smooth actions 12
1.4 Banach vector bundles 14
1.5 Connections on vector bundles 27
1.6 Banach principal bundles 37
1.7 Connections on principal bundles 53
1.8 The curvature of a principal connection 63
1.9 Holonomy groups 67
1.10 Classification of flat bundles 71
2 Fechet spaces 73
2.1 The topology of Fechet spaces 73
2.2 Differentiability 79
2.3 Fechet spaces as pro jective limits 82
2.4 Differential equations in Fr´echet spaces 99
3 Fechet manifolds 105
3.1 Smooth structures on Fechet manifolds 106
3.2 The tangent bundle of a plb-manifold 111
3.3 Vector fields 119
3.4 Fechet-Lie groups 121
3.5 Equations with Maurer-Cartan differential 127
3.6 Differential forms 131
4 Projective systems of principal bundles 139
4.1 Projective systems and Fechet principal bundles 139
4.2 Connections on limit principal bundles 150
v
vi Contents
4.3 Parallel translations and holonomy groups 160
4.4 The curvature of a plb-connection 165
4.5 Flat plb-bundles 172
5 Projective systems of vector bundles 183
5.1 A particular Fr´echet group 183
5.2 Projective systems and Fechet vector bundles 185
5.3 Morphisms of plb-vector bundles 192
5.4 The sections of plb-vector bundles 198
5.5 The pull-back of plb-vector bundles 199
6 Examples of projective systems of bundles 207
6.1 Trivial examples of plb-vector bundles 207
6.2 Plb-vector bundles of maps 208
6.3 The infinite jet bundle 211
6.4 The tangent bundle of a plb-bundle 213
6.5 The generalized frame bundle 216
6.6 Generalized associated bundles 219
7 Connections on plb-vector bundles 225
7.1 Projective limits of linear connections 225
7.2 Parallel displacement and holonomy groups 231
7.3 Connections on plb-vector and frame bundles 237
8 Geometry of second order tangent bundles 245
8.1 The (first order) tangent bundle in brief 246
8.2 Second order tangent bundles 248
8.3 Second order differentials 253
8.4 Connection dependence 256
8.5 Second order Fr´echet tangent bundles 257
8.6 Second order frame bundles 262
Appendix: Further study 273
References 281
List of Notations 291
Subject index 299
Preface
The aim of the authors is to lay down the foundations of the pro jective
systems of various geometrical structures modelled on Banach spaces,
eventually leading to homologous structures in the framework of Fechet
differential geometry, by overcoming some of the inherent deficiencies of
Fechet spaces. We elaborate this brief description in the sequel.
Banach spaces, combining a metric topology (subordinate to a norm),
and a linear space structure (for representing derivatives as linear ap-
proximations to functions in order to do calculus), provide a very conve-
nient setting for many problems in functional analysis, which we need for
handling calculus on function spaces, usually infinite dimensional. They
are a relatively gentle extension from experience on finite dimensional
spaces, since many topological properties of spaces and groups of lin-
ear maps, as well as many of the existence and uniqueness theorems for
solutions of differential equations carry over to the infinite dimensional
case.
Manifolds and fibre bundles modelled on Banach spaces arise from the
synthesis of differential geometry and functional analysis, thus leading
to important examples of global analysis. Indeed, many spaces of (dif-
ferentiable) maps between appropriate manifolds admit the structure of
Banach manifolds (see, for instance, J. Eells [Eel66,§6]).
On the other hand, as mentioned also in [Eel66], Riemannian mani-
folds, represented as rigid maps on infinite dimensional function spaces,
arise as configuration spaces of dynamical systems, with metrics inter-
preted as kinetic energy. Much of the calculus of variations and Morse
theory is concerned with a function space in differential geometry—
the Euler-Lagrange operator of a variational problem is interpreted as
a gradient vector field, with integral curves the paths of steepest as-
cent. Some eigenvalue problems in integral and differential equations are
vii
viii Preface
interpretable via Lagrangian multipliers, involving infinite dimensional
function spaces from differential geometry—such as focal point theory
and geometric consequences of the inverse function theorem in infinite
dimensions.
However, in a number of situations that have significance in global
analysis and physics, for example, physical field theory, Banach space
representations break down. A first step forward is achieved by weaken-
ing the topological requirements: Instead of a norm, a family of semi-
norms is considered. This leads to Fr´echet spaces, which do have a linear
structure and their topology is defined through a sequence of seminorms.
Although Fr´echet spaces seem to be very close to Banach spaces, a
number of critical deficiencies emerge in their framework. For instance,
despite the progress in particular cases, they lack a general solvability
theory of differential equations, even the linear ones; also, the space of
continuous linear morphisms between Fechet spaces does not remain
in the category, and the space of linear isomorphisms does not admit a
reasonable Lie group structure.
The situation becomes much more complicated when we consider man-
ifolds modelled on Fr´echet spaces. Fundamental tools such as the expo-
nential map of a Fr´echet-Lie group may not exist. Additional compli-
cations become particularly noticeable when we try to collect Fr´echet
spaces together to form bundles (over manifolds modelled on atlases of
Fechet spaces), in order to develop geometrical operators like covariant
derivatives and curvature to act on sections of bundles. The structure
group of such bundles, being the general linear group of a Fr´echet space,
is not a Lie group—even worse, it does not have a natural topological
structure. Parallel translations do not necessarily exist because of the in-
herent difficulties in solving differential equations within this framework,
and so on.
This has relevance to real problems. The space of smooth functions
C(I, R), where Iis a compact interval of R, is a Fr´echet space. The
space C(M, V ), of smooth sections of a vector bundle Vover a com-
pact smooth Riemannian manifold Mwith covariant derivative , is a
Fechet space. The CRiemannian metrics on a fixed closed finite-
dimensional orientable manifold has a Fr´echet model space. Fr´echet
spaces of sections arise naturally as configurations of a physical field.
Then the moduli space, consisting of inequivalent configurations of the
physical field, is the quotient of the infinite-dimensional configuration
space Xby the appropriate symmetry gauge group. Typically, Xis
Preface ix
modelled on a Fr´echet space of smooth sections of a vector bundle over
a closed manifold.
Despite their apparent differences, the categories of Banach and Fr´e-
chet spaces are connected through pro jective limits. Indeed, the limiting
real product space R= limn→∞ Rnis the simplest example of this sit-
uation. Taking notice of how Rarises from Rn, this approach extends
to arbitrary Fr´echet spaces, since always they can be represented by a
countable sequence of Banach spaces in a somewhat similar manner. Al-
though careful concentration to the above example is salutary, (bringing
to mind the story of the mathematician drafted to work on a strate-
gic radar project some 70 years ago, who when told of the context said
“but I only know Ohms Law!” and the response came, “you only need
to know Ohms Law, but you must know it very, very well”), it should
be emphasized that the mere properties of Rdo not answer all the
questions and problems referring to the more complicated geometrical
structures mentioned above.
The approach adopted is designed to investigate, in a systematic way,
the extent to which the shortcomings of the Fr´echet context can be
worked round by viewing, under sufficient conditions, geometrical ob-
jects and properties in this context as limits of sequences of their Ba-
nach counterparts, thus exploiting the well developed geometrical tools
of the latter. In this respect, we propose, among other generalizations,
the replacement of certain pathological structures and spaces such as
the structural group of a Fr´echet bundle, various spaces of linear maps,
frame bundles, connections on principal and vector bundles etc., by ap-
propriate entities, susceptible to the limit process. This extends many
classical results to our framework and, to a certain degree, bypasses its
drawbacks.
Apart from the problem of solving differential equations, much of our
work is motivated also by the need to endow infinite-dimensional Lie
groups with an exponential map [a fact characterizing–axiomatically–
the category of (infinite-dimensional) regular Lie groups]; the differential
and vector bundle structure of the set of infinite jets of sections of a Ba-
nach vector bundle (compare with the differential structure described in
[Tak79]); the need to put in a wider perspective particular cases of pro-
jective limits of manifolds and Lie groups appearing in physics (see e.g.
[AM99], [AI92], [AL94], [Bae93]) or in various groups of diffeomorphisms
(e.g. [Les67], [Omo70]).
For the convenience of the reader, we give an outline of the presen-
xPreface
tation, referring for more details to the table of contents and the intro-
duction to each chapter.
Chapter 1introduces the basic notions and results on Banach manifolds
and bundles, with special emphasis on their geometry. Since there is not
a systematic treatment of the general theory of connections on Banach
principal and vector bundles (apart from numerous papers, with some
very fundamental ones among them), occasionally we include extra de-
tails on specific topics, according to the needs of subsequent chapters.
With a few exceptions, there are not proofs in this chapter and the
reader is guided to the literature for details. This is to keep the notes
within a reasonable size; however, the subsequent chapters are essentially
self-contained.
Chapter 2contains a brief account of the structure of Fr´echet spaces and
the differentiability method applied therein. From various possible differ-
entiability methods we have chosen to apply that of J.A. Leslie [Les67],
[Les68], a particular case of ateaux differentiation which fits well to the
structure of locally convex spaces, without recourse to other topologies.
Among the main features of this chapter we mention the representation
of a Fr´echet space by a projective limit of Banach spaces, and that of
some particular spaces of continuous linear maps by projective limits of
Banach functional spaces, a fact not true for arbitrary spaces of linear
maps. An application of the same representation is proposed for study-
ing differential equations in Fechet spaces, including also comments on
other approaches to the same subject. Projective limit representations
of various geometrical structures constitute one of the main tools of our
approach.
Chapter 3is dealing with the smooth structure, under appropriate con-
ditions, of Fechet manifolds arising as projective limits of Banach man-
ifolds, as well as with topics related to their tangent bundles. The case of
Fechet-Lie groups represented by projective limits of Banach-Lie groups
is also studied in detail, because of their fundamental role in the struc-
ture of Fechet principal bundles. Such groups admit an exponential
map, an important property not yet established for arbitrary Fechet-
Lie groups.
Chapter 4is devoted to the study of projective systems of Banach prin-
cipal bundles and their connections. The latter are handled by their
connection forms, global and local ones. It is worthy of note that any
Fechet principal bundle, with structure group one of those alluded to
in Chapter 3, is always representable as a pro jective limit of Banach
Preface xi
principal bundles, while any connection on the former bundle is an ap-
propriate projective limit of connections in the factor bundles of the
limit. Here, related (or conjugate) connections, already treated in Chap-
ter 1, provide an indispensable tool in the approach to connections in
the Fechet framework. We further note that the holonomy groups of
the limit bundle do not necessarily coincide with the projective limits
of the holonomy groups of the factor bundles. This is supported by an
example after the study of flat bundles.
Chapter 5is concerned with projective limits of Banach vector bundles.
If the fibre type of a limit bundle is the Fechet space F, the structure of
the vector bundle is fully determined by a particular group (denoted by
H0(F) and described in §5.1), which replaces the pathological general
linear group GL(F) of F, thus providing the limit with the structure of
a Fr´echet vector bundle. The study of connections on vector bundles of
the present type is deferred until Chapter 7.
Chapter 6contains a collection of examples of Fr´echet bundles realized
as projective limits of Banach ones. Among them, we cite in particular
the bundle J(E) of infinite jets of sections of a Banach vector bundle
E. This is a non trivial example of a Fr´echet vector bundle, essentially
motivating the conditions required to define the structure of an arbi-
trary vector bundle in the setting of Chapter 5. On the other hand, the
generalized bundle of frames of a Fr´echet vector bundle is an important
example of a principal bundle with structure group the aforementioned
group H0(F).
Chapter 7aims at the study of connections on Fechet vector bundles the
latter being in the sense of Chapter 5. The relevant notions of parallel
displacement along a curve and the holonomy group are also examined.
Both can be defined, despite the inherent difficulties of solving equations
in Fr´echet spaces, by reducing the equations involved to their counter-
parts in the factor Banach bundles.
Chapter 8is mainly focused on the vector bundle structure of the second
order tangent bundle of a Banach manifold. Such a structure is always
defined once we choose a linear connection on the base manifold, thus
a natural question is to investigate the dependence of the vector bun-
dle structure on the choice of the connection. The answer relies on the
possibility to characterize the second order differentials as vector bundle
morphisms, which is affirmative if the connections involved are properly
related (conjugate). The remaining part of the chapter is essentially an
xii Preface
application of our methods to the second order Fr´echet tangent bundle
and the corresponding (generalized) frame bundle.
We conclude with a series of open problems or suggestions for further
applications, within the general framework of our approach to Fr´echet
geometry, eventually leading to certain topics not covered here.
These notes are addressed to researchers and graduate students of math-
ematics and physics with an interest in infinite-dimensional geometry,
especially that of Banach and Fr´echet manifolds and bundles. Since we
have in mind a wide audience, with possibly different backgrounds and
interests, we have paid particular attention to the details of the exposi-
tion so that it is as far as possible self-contained. However, a familiarity
with the rudiments of the geometry of manifolds and bundles (at least
of finite dimensions) is desirable if not necessary.
It is a pleasure to acknowledge our happy collaboration, started over
ten years ago by discussing some questions of common research interest
and resulting in a number of joint papers. The writing of these notes is
the outcome of this enjoyable activity. Finally, we are very grateful to
an extremely diligent reviewer who provided many valuable comments
and suggestions on an earlier draft, we have benefited much from this in
the final form of the monograph.
Manchester – Piraeus – Athens,
February 2015
References
[AA96] P.L. Antonelli and M. Anastasiei: The Differential Geometry of La-
grangians which Generate Sprays. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996.
[AAB94] Y.A. Abramovich, C.D. Aliprantis and O. Burkinshaw: Invari-
ant Ssubspace theorems for positive operators. J. Functional Analysis
14(1994), 95-111.
[ABB09] S. Agethen, K.D. Bierstedt and J. Bonet: Projective limits of
weighted (LB)-spaces of continuous functions. Arch. Math. (Basel) 92
(2009), 384-398.
[ADG07] M. Aghasi, C.T.J. Dodson, G.N. Galanis and A. Suri: Infinite di-
mensional second order ordinary differential equations via T2M. Nonlin-
ear Analysis 67 (2007), 2829–2838.
[ADG08] M. Aghasi, C.T.J. Dodson, G.N. Galanis and A. Suri:Conjugate con-
nections and differential equations on infinite dimensional manifolds. VIII
International Colloquium on Differential Geometry, Santiago de Com-
postela, 7–11 July 2008. World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 227–236, 2009.
[AI92] A. Ashtekar and C.J. Isham: Representations of the holonomy algebras
of gravity and non-abelian gauge theories. Class. Quantum Grav. 9(1992),
1433–1467.
[AIM93] P.L. Antonelli, R.S. Ingarden and M.S. Matsumoto: The Theory
of Sprays and Finsler Spaces with Applications in Physics and Biology.
Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.
[AL94] A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski: Representation Theory of Analytic
Holonomy C*-algebras, Knots and Quantum Gravity. J.C. Baez ed., Ox-
ford University Press, Oxford, 1994.
[AJP97] S. Albeverio, J. Jost, S. Paycha, S. Scarlatti: A mathematical intro-
duction to string theory. Variational problems, geometric and probabilistic
methods. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 225. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
[AL95] A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski: Differential geometry on the space
of connections via graphs and projective limits. J. Geom. Phys 17 (1995),
191–230.
[AM99] M. C. Abbati and A. Mani`a: On differential structure for projective
limits of manifolds. J. Geom. Phys. 29 (1999), 35-63.
281
282 References
[AMR88] R. Abraham, J.E. Marsden and T. Ratiu: Manifolds, Tensor Anal-
ysis, and Applications (2nd edition). Springer, New York, 1988.
[AR67] R. Abraham and J. Robbin: Transversal Mappings and Flows. Ben-
jamin, New York, 1967.
[AO09] R.P. Agarwal and D. O’Regan: Fixed point theory for various classes
of permissible maps via index theory. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 24
(2009), 247-263.
[APS60] W. Ambrose, R.S. Palais and I.M. Singer: Sprays. Anais da Academia
Brasieira de Ciencias 32 (1960), 1–15.
[Ans97] S.I. Ansari. Existence of hypercyclic operators on topological vector
spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 148 (1997), 384-390.
[Atz83] A. Atzmon: An operator without invariant subspaces on a nuclear
Fr´echet space. Ann. of Math. 117 (1983), 669–694.
[Bae93] J.C. Baez: Diffeomorphism-invariant generalized measures on the
space of connections modulo gauge transformations. Proceeding of the
Conference on Quantum Topology, Manhattan, Kansas, March 24-28,
1993.
[BB03] K.D. Bierstedt and J. Bonet: Some aspects of the modern theory of
Fr´echet spaces. RACSAM. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc.Exactas F´ıs. Nat. Ser. A
Mat. 97 (2003), 159–188.
[BDH86] E. Behrends, S. Dierolf, and P. Harmand: On a problem of Bellenot
and Dubinsky. Math. Ann. 275 (1986), 337–339.
[Ble81] D. Bleecker: Gauge Theory and Variational Principles. Addison-
Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1981.
[BM09] F. Bayart and E. Matheron: Dynamics of Linear Operators. Cam-
bridge Tracts in Mathematics 179, Cambridge University Press, Cam-
bridge, 2009.
[BMM89] J. Bonet, G. Metafune, M. Maestre, V.B. Moscatelli and D. Vogt:
Every quojection is the quotient of a countable product of Banach spaces
(Istanbul, 1988), 355–356. NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci.
287, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989.
[Bou67] N. Bourbaki: Variet´es diff´erentielles et analytiques. Fascicule de
esultats,§§1–7. Hermann, Paris, 1967.
[Bou71] N. Bourbaki: Variet´es diff´erentielles et analytiques. Fascicule de
esultats,§§8–15. Hermann, Paris, 1971.
[Bou72] N. Bourbaki: Groupes et alg`ebres de Lie. Chapitres 2–3, Paris, 1972.
[BP75] C. Bessaga and A. Pe lczy´nski: Selected topics in infinite dimensional
topology. PWN, Warszawa 1975.
[BT11] G. Bellomonte and C. Trapani: Rigged Hilbert spaces and contractive
families of Hilbert spaces. Monatsh. Math. 164 (2011), 271-285.
[Cab12] P. Cabau: strong projective limits of Banach Lie algebroids. Portugal.
Math. 69 (2012), 1–21.
[Car67(a)] H. Cartan: Calcul Diff´erentiel. Hermann, Paris, 1971.
[Car67(b)] H. Cartan: Formes Diff´erentielles. Hermann, Paris, 1967.
[CD85] D. Canarutto and C.T.J. Dodson: On the bundle of principal con-
nections and the stability of b-incompleteness of manifolds. Math. Proc.
Camb. Phil. Soc. 98 (1985), 51–59.
References 283
[CDL89] L.A. Cordero, C.T.J. Dodson and M.de Leon: Differential Geometry
of Frame Bundles. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989.
[CEO09] R. Choukri, A. El Kinani, and M. Oudadess: On some von Neumann
topological algebras. Banach J. Math. Anal. 3(2009), 55-63.
[CK03] A. Constantin and B. Kolev: Geodesic flow on the diffeomorphism
group of the circle. Comm. Math. Helv. 78 (2003), 787–804.
[Dal00] H.G. Dales: Banach algebras and automatic continuity. London Math-
ematical Society Monographs, New Series 24. Oxford Science Publica-
tions, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
[DD88] L. Del Riego and C.T.J. Dodson: Sprays, universality and stability.
Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 103 (1988), 515–534.
[DEF99] P. Deligne, P. Etingof, D.S. Freed, L.C. Jeffrey, D. Kazhdan,
J.W. Morgan, D.R. Morrison, E. Witten (Editors): Quantum fields and
strings: a course for mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2. Material from the Special
Year on Quantum Field Theory held at the Institute for Advanced Study,
Princeton NJ, 1996–1997. AMS, Providence RI, 1999.
[Die72] J. Dieudonn´e: Treatise on Analysis, Vol. III. Academic Press, New
York, 1972.
[Dil03] S.J. Dilworth and V.G. Troitsky: Spectrum of a weakly hypercyclic
operator meets the unit circle. Contemporary Mathematics 321 (2003),
67-69.
[DG04] C.T.J. Dodson and G.N. Galanis: Second order tangent bundles of
infinite dimensional manifolds. J. Geom. Phys. 52 (2004), 127–136.
[DG05] C.T.J. Dodson and G.N. Galanis: Bundles of acceleration on Banach
manifolds. Nonlinear Analysis 63 (2005), 465-471.
[DGV05] C.T.J. Dodson, G.N. Galanis and E. Vassiliou: A generalized second
order frame bundle for Fr´echet manifolds. J. Geom. Phys. 55 (2005),
291–305.
[DGV06] C.T.J. Dodson, G.N. Galanis and E. Vassiliou: Isomorphism clas-
ses for Banach vector bundle structures of second tangents. Math. Proc.
Camb. Phil. Soc. 141 (2006), 489–496.
[DM86] C.T.J. Dodson and M. Modugno: Connections over connections and
universal calculus. Proc. VI Convegno Nazionale di Relativita General
e Fisica Della Gravitazione Florence, 10-13 October 1984, 89–97, Eds.
R. Fabbri and M. Modugno, Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, 1986.
[DP97] C.T.J. Dodson and P.E. Parker: A User’s Guide to Algebraic Topology.
Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.
[Dod88] C.T.J. Dodson: Categories, Bundles and Spacetime Topology (2nd
edition). Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988.
[Dod12] C.T.J. Dodson: A review of some recent work on hypercyclicity. In-
vited paper, Workshop celebrating the 65 birthday of L.A. Cordero, San-
tiago de Compostela, June 27-29, 2012. Balkan J. Geom. App. (2014), in
press.
[Dom62] P. Dombrowski: On the geometry of the tangent bundle. J. Reine und
Angewante Math. 210 (1962), 73–88.
[Dow62] C.H. Dowker: Lectures on Sheaf Theory. Tata Inst. Fund. Research,
Bombay, 1962.
284 References
[DR82] C.T.J. Dodson and M.S. Radivoiovici: Tangent and Frame bundles of
order two. Anal. S¸tiint. Univ. ”Al. I. Cuza” 28 (1982), 63-71.
[DRP95] L. Del Riego and P.E. Parker: Pseudoconvex and disprisoning ho-
mogeneus sprays, Geom. Dedicata 55 (1995), no. 2, 211–220.
[Dub79] E. Dubinsky: The structure of nuclear Fechet spaces. Lecture Notes
in Mathematics 720, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1979.
[Dug75] J. Dugundji: Topology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1975.
[Dup78] J.L. Dupont: Curvature and Characteristic Classes. Lecture Notes in
Mathematics 640, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1978.
[DV90] C.T.J. Dodson and M.E. Vazquez-Abal: Harmonic fibrations of the
tangent bundle of order two. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. 7 4-B (1990) 943-952.
[DV92] C.T.J. Dodson and M.E. Vazquez-Abal: Tangent and frame bundle
harmonic lifts. Mathematicheskie Zametki of Acad. Sciences of USSR
50, 3, (1991), 27-37 (Russian). Translation in Math. Notes 3-4 (1992),
902908.
http://www.maths.manchester.ac.uk/kd/PREPRINTS/91MatZemat.pdf
[DZ84] S. Dierolf and D. N. Zarnadze: A note on strictly regular Fr´echet
spaces. Arch. Math. 42 (1984), 549–556.
[Ebin67] D.G. Ebin: On the space of Riemannian metrics. Doctoral Thesis,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.
[Ebin68] D.G. Ebin: On the space of Riemannian metrics. Bull. Amer. Math.
Soc. 74 (1968), 1001-1003.
[EE67] C.J. Earle and J. Eells Jr.: Foliations and fibrations. J. Diff. Geom. 1
(1967), 33–41.
[Eel66] J. Eells Jr.: A setting for global analysis. Bull. A.M.S 72 (1966), 751–
807.
[Eli67] H.I. Eliasson: Geometry of manifolds of maps. J. Diff. Geom. 1(1967),
169–174.
[EM70] D.G. Ebin and J. Marsden: Groups of diffeomorphisms and the motion
of an incompressible fluid. Ann. of Math. 92 (1970), 101–162.
[Enf87] P. Enflo: On the invariant subspace problem for Banach spaces. Acta
Mathematica (1987), 213–313.
[FK72] P. Flaschel and W. Klingenberg: Riemannsche Hilbert-mannigfaltig-
keiten. Periodische Geodatische. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 282,
Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1972.
[Fuk05] K. Fukumizu: Infinite dimensional exponential families by reproducing
kernel Hilbert spaces. Proc. 2nd International Symposium on Information
Geometry and its Applications, December 12-16, 2005, Tokyo, pp. 324-
333.
[FW96] L. Frerick and J. Wengenroth: A sufficient condition for vanishing of
the derived projective limit functor. Archiv der Mathematik 67 (1996),
296–301.
[Gal96] G. Galanis: Projective limits of Banach-Lie groups. Period. Math.
Hungar. 32 (1996), 179–191.
[Gal97(a)] G. Galanis: On a type of linear differential equations in Fr´echet
spaces. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa 24 (1997), 501–510.
References 285
[Gal97(b)] G. Galanis: On a type of Fr´echet principal bundles over Banach
bases. Period. Math. Hungar. 35 (1997), 15–30.
[Gal98] G. Galanis: Projective limits of Banach vector bundles. Portugal.
Math. 55 (1998), 11-24.
[Gal04] G. Galanis: Differential and geometric structure for the tangent bun-
dle of a projective limit manifold. Rend. Seminario Matem. Padova 112
(2004), 104–115.
[Gal07] G. Galanis: Universal connections in Fechet principal bundles. Pe-
riod. Math. Hungar. 54 (2007), 1–13.
[GP05] G. Galanis and P. Palamides: Nonlinear differential equations in
Fr´echet spaces and continuum cross-sections. Anal. S¸tiint. Univ.
”Al. I. Cuza” 51 (2005), 41–54.
[Gar72] P. L. Garcia: Connections and 1-jet fibre bundles. Rend. Sem. Mat.
Univ. Padova 47 (1972), 227–242.
[GEM11] K-G. Grosse-Erdmann and A.P. Manguillot: Linear Chaos. Univer-
sitext, Springer, London, 2011.
[GGR13] H. Ghahremani-Gol, A. Razavi: Ricci flow and the manifold of Rie-
mannian metrics. Balkan J. Geom. App. 18 (2013,) 20-30.
[GHV73] W. Greub, S. Halperin and R. Vanstone: Connections, Curvature
and Cohomology, Vol. II. Academic Press, N. York, 1973.
[God73] R. Godement: Topologie Alg´ebrique et Th´eorie des Faisceaux (3`eme
´edition). Hermann, Paris, 1973.
[Gol12] M. Goli´nski: Invariant subspace problem for classical spaces of func-
tions J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), 1251–1273.
[Gol13] M. Goli´nski: Operator on the space rapidly decreasing functions with
all non-zero vectors hypercyclic Adv. Math. 244 (2013), 663–677.
[Gro58] A. Grothendieck: A general theory of fibre spaces with structural sheaf
(2nd edition). Kansas Univ., 1958.
[GV98] G. Galanis and E. Vassiliou: A Floquet-Liapunov theorem in Fechet
spaces. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa 27 (1998), 427–436.
[Ham82] R.S. Hamilton: The inverse function theorem of Nash and Moser.
Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 7(1982), 65–222.
[Har64] P. Hartman: Ordinary Differential Equations. Wiley, New York, 1964.
[Hir66] F. Hirzebruch: Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry. Springer-
Verlag, New York, 1966.
[Hye45] D.H. Hyers: Linear topological spaces. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 51
(1945), 1–24.
[Jar81] H. Jarchow: Locally Convex Spaces. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1981.
[KJ80] S.G. Kreˇın and N.I. Yatskin: Linear Differential Equations on Mani-
folds. Voronezh Gos. Univ., Voronezh, 1980 (in Russian).
[KLT09] J. Kakol, M.P. Lopez Pellicer and A.R. Todd: A topological vector
space is Fr´echet-Urysohn if and only if it has bounded tightness. Bull.
Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 16 (2009), 313-317.
[KM90] A. Kriegl and P.W. Michor: The Convenient Setting of Global Analy-
sis. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 53 (1997), American Math-
ematical Society.
286 References
[KM97] A. Kriegl and P.W. Michor: A convenient setting for real analytic
mappings. Acta Math. 165 (1990),105–159.
[KN68] S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu: Foundations of Differential Geometry,
Vol. I. Interscience, New York, 1968.
[KN69] S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu: Foundations of Differential Geometry,
Vol. II. Interscience, New York, 1969.
[Kos60] J.L. Koszul: Lectures on Fibre Bundles and Differential Geometry.
Tata Institute, Bombay, 1960.
[KS09] A. Kogasaka and K. Sakai: A Hilbert cube compactification of the func-
tion space with the compact-open topology. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 7(2009),
670-682.
[Kur68] K. Kuratowski: Topology. Halner, New York, 1968.
[Lan99] S. Lang: Fundamentals of Differential Geometry. Springer, New York,
1999.
[Laz65] M. Lazard: Groupes Diff´erentiables. Notes, Institut H. Poincar´e, Paris,
1965.
[Lem86] R. Lemmert: On ordinary differential equations in locally convex
spaces. Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications 10 (1986),
1385–1390.
[Les67] J.A. Leslie: On a differential structure for the group of diffeomor-
phisms. Topology 46 (1967), 263–271.
[Les68] J.A. Leslie: Some Frobenious theorems in Global Analysis. J. Diff.
Geom. 42 (1968), 279–297.
[LGV] V. Lakshmikantham, T. Gnana Bhaskar, J. Vasundhara Devi: Theory
of Set Differential Equations in a Metric Space (to appear).
[LT09] A.T-M. Lau and W. Takahashi: Fixed point properties for semigroup
of nonexpansive mappings on Fechet spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009),
3837–3841.
[Lob92] S.G. Lobanov: Picard’s theorem for ordinary differential equations in
local ly convex spaces. Izv. Ross.Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 56 (1992), 1217–
1243; English translation in Russian Acad. Sci. Izv. Math. 41 (1993),
465–487.
[Mag04] J.-P. Magnot: Structure groups and holonomy in infinite dimensions.
Bull. Sci. Math. 128 (2004), 513–529.
[Mai62] B. Maissen: Lie Gruppen mit Banachr¨aumen als Parameterr¨aume.
Acta Mathem. 108 (1962), 229–270.
[Man98] P. Manoharan: Characterization for spaces of sections. Proc. Amer.
Math. Soc. 126 (1998), 1205–1210.
[Man02] P. Manoharan: On the geometry of free loop spaces. Int. J. Math.
Math. Sci. 30 (2002), 15–23.
[Max72] L. Maxim: Connections compatibles with Fredholm structures on Ba-
nach manifolds. Anal. S¸tiint. Univ. ”Al. I. Cuza” Isi 18 (1972), 384–400.
[Mil58] J. Milnor: On the existence of a connection with curvature zero. Com.
Math. Helvetici 32 (1958), 215–223.
[MM83] L. Mangiarotti and M. Modugno: Fibred spaces, jet spaces and con-
nections for field theories. Proc. International Meeting on Geometry and
References 287
Physics, Florence, 12-15 October 1982. Ed. M. Modugno, Pitagora Ed-
itrice, Bologna, 1983, 135–165.
[MV85] R. Meise and D. Vogt: A characterization of the quasinormable
Fr´echet spaces. Math. Nachr. 122 (1985), 141–150.
[MV97] R. Meise and D. Vogt: Introduction to Functional Analysis. Oxford
Graduate Texts in Mathematics 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford University
Press, New York, 1997.
[Mod87] M. Modugno: Systems of vector valued forms on a fibred manifold and
applications to gauge theories. Proc. Conference Differential Geometric
Methods in Mathematical Physics, Salamanca 1985. Lecture Notes in
Mathematics 1251, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1987, 238–264.
[Nab00] G.L. Naber: Topology, Geometry, and Gauge Fields. Interactions.
Springer, New York, 2000.
[NBa13] F. Nielsen and F. Barbaresco (Eds.): Geometric Science of Informa-
tion, Proceedings GSI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8085,
Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
[NBh12] F. Nielsen and R. Bhatia (Eds.): Matrix Information Geometry.
Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2012.
http://www.springer.com/engineering/signals/book/978-3-642-30231-2
[Nee06] K-H. Neeb: Infinite Dimensional Lie Groups, 2005 Monastir Summer
School Lectures, Lecture Notes, January 2006.
http://www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/wockel/data/monastir.pdf
[Nee09] K-H. Neeb and C. Wockel, Central extensions of groups of sections.
Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 36 (2009), 381-418.
[Nic95] L.I. Nicolaescu: Lecture Notes on the Geometry of Manifolds. World
Scientific, Singapore, 1996.
[Nil14] F. Nielsen (Ed.): Geometric Theory of Information. Springer, Heidel-
berg (2014) in press.
[NR61] M.S. Narasimhan and S. Ramanan: Existence of universal connections
I. Amer. J. Math. 83 (1961), 563–572.
[NR63] M. S. Narasimhan and S. Ramanan: Existence of universal connections
II. Amer. J. Math. 85 (1963), 223–231.
[NS95] S. Nag and D. Sullivan: Teichmuller theory and the universal period
mapping via quantum calculus and the H1/2space on the circle. Osaka
Journal Math. 32 (1995), 1–34.
[Omo70] H. Omori: On the group of diffeomorphisms on a compact manifold.
Proc. Symp. Pure Appl. Math. AMS XV (1970), 167–183.
[Omo74] H. Omori: Infinite Dimensional Lie Transformation Groups, Lecture
Notes in Mathematics 427, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1974.
[Omo78] H. Omori: On Banach Lie groups acting on finite dimensional man-
ifolds. Tohoku Math. J. 30 (1978), 223–250.
[Omo97] H. Omori: Infinite-dimensional Lie groups. Translations of Mathe-
matical Monographs 158, Amer. Math. Soc., 1997.
[Pa65] R.S. Palais: Seminar on the Atiyah-Singer index theormem. Ann.
Math. Studies 57, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton NJ, 1965.
[Pa68] R.S. Palais: Foundations of global non-linear analysis. W.A. Benjamin,
New York, 1968.
288 References
[Pal68] V.P. Palamodov: The projective limit functor in the category of linear
topological spaces : Math. USSR-Sbornik 75 (117) (1968), 529–559.
http://iopscience.iop.org/0025-5734/4/4/A05
[Pap80] N. Papaghiuc: ´
Equations diff´erentielles lin´eaires dans les espaces de
Fr´echet. Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 25 (1980), 83–88.
[Pay01] S. Paycha: Basic prerequisites in differential geometry and operator
theory in view of applications to quantum field theory. Preprint Universit´e
Blaise Pascal, Clermont, France, 2001.
[Pen67] J.-P. Penot: De submersions en fibrations. S´eminaire de G´eom´etrie
Diff´erentielle de P. Libermann. Paris, 1967.
[Pen69] J.-P. Penot: Connexion lin´eaire d´eduite d’ une famille de connexions
lin´eaires par un foncteur vectoriel multilin´eaire. C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris
268 (1969), s´erie A, 100–103.
[Pha69] Q.M. Pham: Introduction `a la G´eom´etrie des Varet´es Diff´erentiables.
Dunod, Paris, 1969.
[Pir09] A.Yu. Pirkovskii: Flat cyclic Fechet modules, amenable Fechet alge-
bras, and approximate identities. Homology, Homotopy Appl. 11 (2009),
81-114.
[PV95] M. Poppenberg and D. Vogt: A tame splitting theorem for exact se-
quences of Fechet spaces. Math. Z. 219 (1995), 141–161.
[Rea88] C.J. Read: The invariant subspace problem for a class of Banach
spaces, 2. Hypercyclic operators. Israel J. Math. 63 (1988), 1–40.
[Sau87] D.J. Saunders: Jet fields, connections and second order differential
equations. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20 (1987), 3261–3270.
[Sch80] H.H. Schaeffer: Topological Vector Spaces. Springer-Verlag, Heidel-
berg, 1980.
[SM94] C.G. Small and D.L. McLeash: Hilbert space methods in probability
and statistical inference. John Wiley, Chichester, 1994, reprinted 2011.
[Smo07] N.K. Smolentsev: Spaces of Riemannian metrics. Journal of Mathe-
matical Sciences 142 (2007), 2436-2519.
[SS70] L.A. Steen and J.A. Seebach Jnr.: Counterexamples in Topology. Holt,
Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1970.
[SW72] R. Sulanke and P. Wintgen: Differentialgeometrie und Faserb¨undel.
Birkh¨auser Verlag, Basel, 1972.
[Tak79] F. Takens: A global version of the inverse problem of the calculus of
variations. J. Dif. Geom. 14 (1979), 543–562.
[Thi07] T. Thiemann: Modern canonical quantum general relativity. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2007.
[Tka10] M. Tkachenko: Abelian groups admitting a Fr´echet-Urysohn pseudo-
compact topological group topology. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 214 (2010),
1103-1109.
[Val89] M. Valdivia: A characterization of total ly reflexive Fechet spaces.
Math. Z. 200 (1989), 327–346.
[Vas78(a)] E. Vassiliou: (f, ϕ, h)-related connections and Liapunoff ’s theorem.
Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 27 (1978), 337–346.
[Vas78(b)] E. Vassiliou: On the infinite dimensional holonomy theorem. Bull.
Soc. Roy. Sc. Li`ege 9-10 (1978), 223–228.
References 289
[Vas81] E. Vassiliou: On affine transformations of banachable bundles. Colloq.
Math. 44 (1981), 117–123.
[Vas82] E. Vassiliou: Transformations of linear connections. Period. Math.
Hung. 13 (1982), 289–308.
[Vas83] E. Vassiliou: Flat bundles and holonomy homomorphisms. Manu-
scripta Math. 42 (1983), 161–170.
[Vas86] E. Vassiliou: Transformations of linear connections II. Period. Math.
Hung. 17 (1986), 1–11.
[Vas13] E. Vassiliou: Local connection forms revisited. Rend. Circ. Mat.
Palermo 62 (2013), 393–408. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.6471.pdf.
[Vel02] J.M. Velhinho: A groupoid approach to spaces of generalized connec-
tions. J. Geometry and Physics 41 (2002), 166-180.
[VerE83] P. Ver Eecke: Fondements du Calcul Diff´erentielle. Presses Univer-
sitaires de France, Paris, 1983.
[VerE85] P. Ver Eecke: Applications du Calcul Diff´erentielle. Presses Univer-
sitaires de France, Paris, 1985.
[Vero74] M.E. Verona: Maps and forms on generalised manifolds. St. Cerc.
Mat. 26 (1974), 133–143 (in romanian).
[Vero79] M.E. Verona: A de Rham theorem for generalized manifolds. Proc.
Edinburg Math. Soc. 22 (1979), 127–135.
[VG97] E. Vassiliou and G. Galanis: A generalized frame bundle for certain
Fr´echet vector bundles and linear connections. Tokyo J. Math. 20 (1997),
129–137.
[Vil67] J. Vilms: Connections on tangent bundles. J. Diff. Geom. 1(1967),
235–243.
[Vog77] D. Vogt: Characterisierung der Unterr¨aume von s. Math. Z. 155
(1977), 109-117.
[Vog79] D. Vogt: Sequence space representations of spaces of test functions
and distributions. Functional analysis, holomorphy and approximation
theory (Rio de Janeiro, 1979), pp. 405–443. Lecture Notes in Pure and
Appl. Math. 83, Dekker, New York, 1983.
[Vog83] D. Vogt: Fr´echetr¨aume, zwishen denen jede stetige Abbildung be-
schr¨ankt ist. J. Reine Angew. Math. 345 (1983), 182-200.
[Vog87] D. Vogt: On the functors Ext1(E , F )for Fechet spaces. Studia Math.
85 (1987), 163-197.
[Vog10] D. Vogt: A nuclear Fechet space consisting of C-functions and fail-
ing the bounded approximation property. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138
(2010), 1421-1423.
[VW80] D. Vogt and M.J. Wagner: Josef Charakterisierung der Quotin-
tenr¨aume von s und eine Vermutung von Martineau. Studia Math. 67
(1980), 225-240.
[VW81] D. Vogt and M.J. Wagner: Charakterisierung der Quotintenr¨aume
der nuklearen stabilen Potenzreihenr¨aume von unendlichen Typ. Studia
Math. 70 (1981), 63-80.
[War83] F.W. Warner: Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie
Groups. GTM 94, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983.
290 References
[Wen03] J. Wengenroth: Derived functors in functional analysis. Lecture
Notes in Mathematics 1810, Springer-verlag, Berlin, 2003.
[Wol09] E. Wolf: Quasinormable weighted Fr´echet spaces of entire functions.
Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 16 (2009), 351-360.
... The construction above can be formalized through a projective limit construction for complex Banach manifolds. As explained in [21], in the smooth category, one can take a projective limit of Banach manifolds and the limit is a Fréchet manifold, and moreover a projective family of locally diffeomorphic mappings between projective systems gives rise to a local diffeomorphism between the two limiting Fréchet manifolds (see Propositions 3.13, 3.18, and Corollary 3.29 in [21]). The proofs go through verbatim in the holomorphic category, although we don't need to refer to [21] for the whole thing since the construction above is explicit. ...
... The construction above can be formalized through a projective limit construction for complex Banach manifolds. As explained in [21], in the smooth category, one can take a projective limit of Banach manifolds and the limit is a Fréchet manifold, and moreover a projective family of locally diffeomorphic mappings between projective systems gives rise to a local diffeomorphism between the two limiting Fréchet manifolds (see Propositions 3.13, 3.18, and Corollary 3.29 in [21]). The proofs go through verbatim in the holomorphic category, although we don't need to refer to [21] for the whole thing since the construction above is explicit. ...
... As explained in [21], in the smooth category, one can take a projective limit of Banach manifolds and the limit is a Fréchet manifold, and moreover a projective family of locally diffeomorphic mappings between projective systems gives rise to a local diffeomorphism between the two limiting Fréchet manifolds (see Propositions 3.13, 3.18, and Corollary 3.29 in [21]). The proofs go through verbatim in the holomorphic category, although we don't need to refer to [21] for the whole thing since the construction above is explicit. Remark 6.4. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
For S a closed surface of genus at least 2, let Hit3(S)\mathrm{Hit}_3(S) be the Hitchin component of representations to SL(3,R),\mathrm{SL}(3,\mathbb{R}), equipped with the Labourie-Loftin complex structure. We construct a mapping class group equivariant holomorphic map from a large open subset of Hit3(S)×Hit3(S)\mathrm{Hit}_3(S)\times \overline{\mathrm{Hit}_3(S)} to the SL(3,C)\mathrm{SL}(3,\mathbb{C})-character variety that restricts to the identity on the diagonal and to Bers' simultaneous uniformization on T(S)×T(S)\mathcal{T}(S)\times \overline{\mathcal{T}(S)}. The open subset contains Hit3(S)×T(S)\mathrm{Hit}_3(S)\times \overline{\mathcal{T}(S)} and T(S)×Hit3(S)\mathcal{T}(S)\times \overline{\mathrm{Hit}_3(S)}, and the image includes the holonomies of SL(3,C)\mathrm{SL}(3,\mathbb{C})-opers. The map is realized by associating pairs of Hitchin representations to immersions into C3\mathbb{C}^3 that we call complex affine spheres, which are equivalent to certain conformal harmonic maps into SL(3,C)/SO(3,C)\mathrm{SL}(3,\mathbb{C})/\mathrm{SO}(3,\mathbb{C}) and to new objects called bi-Higgs bundles. Complex affine spheres are obtained by solving a second-order complex elliptic PDE that resembles both the Beltrami and Tzitz\'eica equations. To study this equation we establish analytic results that should be of independent interest.
... See [6,Chapter 14] for theory and exposition around these notions of holomorphicity, and the Graves-Taylor-Hille-Zorn theorem. Note that, in our source [6], the most general result is stated for open subsets of complex Banach spaces, but by taking projective limits it extends to Fréchet spaces [7], and since holomorphicity is local, the result extends further to Fréchet manifolds. By [2,Lemma 6], the map in question is continuous, and hence the theorem is proved for l = 0. ...
... and both terms above tend to 0 as s → 0. Bootstrapping via Theorem 2.3 again, we deduce that χ(s) tends to 0 in W 1+1,p loc (Ω) as s → 0, which proves the second assertion. Finally, for the "moreover" statement, we compute, using (7), that (∂ z − µ∂ z )(θ µ,a − θ µn,an ) = (∂ z − µ∂ z )θ µ,a − (∂ z − µ n ∂ z )θ µn,an + (µ n − µ)∂ z θ µn,an = a∂ z f µ − a n ∂ z f µn + (µ n − µ)∂ z θ µn,an , and hence for n large, ||(∂ z −µ∂ z )(θ µ,a −θ µn,an )|| W l,p (U) ≤ (||a|| W l,∞ (U) +1)||f µ −f µn || W l,p (U) +||µ n −µ|| W l,∞ (U) ||θ µn,an || W l+1,p (U) . ...
Preprint
Full-text available
We prove that, given a path of Beltrami differentials on C\mathbb C that live in and vary holomorphically in the Sobolev space Wlocl,(Ω)W^{l,\infty}_{loc}(\Omega) of an open subset ΩC\Omega\subset \mathbb C, the canonical solutions to the Beltrami equation vary holomorphically in Wlocl+1,p(Ω)W^{l+1,p}_{loc}(\Omega) for admissible p>2p > 2. This extends a foundational result of Ahlfors and Bers (the case l=0l = 0). As an application, we deduce that Bers metrics on surfaces depend holomorphically on their input data.
... The geometry of Fréchet manifolds, in particular higher order structures on tangent bundles, has progressed widely in the past few years, see for example [3,2,1,4,9,8,6,7,20]. A crucial concern in dealing with these manifolds is that the general linear group of a Fréchet space is not a Lie group, therefore, it can not serve as a structure group of bundles. ...
Preprint
For Frechet manifolds by using sprays, we construct connection maps, linear symmetric connections on tangent and second-order tangent bundles. We characterize linear symmetric connections on tangent bundles by using the bilinear symmetric mappings associated with a given spray on a manifold. Moreover, we give another characterization of linear symmetric connections on tangent bundles using tangent structures. We prove that there is a bijective correspondence between linear symmetric connections on tangent bundles and connection maps induced by sprays on a manifold.
Chapter
We review how diffeologies complete the settings classically used from infinite dimensional geometry to partial differential equations, based on classical settings of functional analysis and with classical mapping spaces as key examples. As the classical examples of function spaces, we deal with manifolds of mappings in Sobolev classes (and describe the ILB setting), jet spaces and spaces of triangulations, that are key frameworks for the two fields of applications of diffeologies that we choose to highlight: evolution equations and integrable systems, and optimization problems constrained by partial differential equations.
Article
Full-text available
We first define the concept of Lie algebroid in the convenient setting. In reference to the finite dimensional context, we adapt the notion of prolongation of a Lie algebroid over a fibred manifold to a convenient Lie algebroid over a fibred manifold. Then we show that this construction is stable under projective and direct limits under adequate assumptions.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, the similarity measurement issue, in the context of texture images comparison, is tackled from a geometrical point of view by computing the Rao Geodesic distance on the Generalized Gamma distributions (GΓ\Gamma D) manifold. This latter permits a generic and flexible characterization thanks to its three-parameters modeling. We take advantage of information geometry tools to consider the GΓ\Gamma D as a geometrical manifold and thus to define the geodesic distance (GD) as a real and intuitive similarity measure rather than the purely statistical Kullback-Leibler divergence. However, the three-parameter space turns out to be cumbersome when it comes to solving the geodesic equations. This explains why the main studies that tried to solve this problem have been content to use mappings to some embedded submanifolds to modify and approximate the accurate geodesic model by computing geodesic distances only on integrable submanifolds. Our main contribution is to approximate the GD in a more general manner, i.e considering all cases of the manifold coordinates. We managed to derive a closed-form of the modified geodesic model on sub-manifolds when the shape parameters are fixed. In the case of the fixed scale parameters, the geodesic equations are solved and a numerical approximation is directly applied to derive the geodesic distance. When the three parameters are allowed to vary, we approximate the GD using two different ways. The first is treated by the mean of a polynomial approach, while the second is subject to a graph-based approach. The proposed approaches are evaluated considering the Content-Based Texture Retrieval (CBTR) application on three different databases (VisTex, Brodatz, and USPTex) in order to show their effectiveness over the state-of-the-art methods.
Book
Full-text available
This book brings together geometric tools and their applications for Information analysis. It collects current and many uses of in the interdisciplinary fields of Information Geometry Manifolds in Advanced Signal, Image & Video Processing, Complex Data Modeling and Analysis, Information Ranking and Retrieval, Coding, Cognitive Systems, Optimal Control, Statistics on Manifolds, Machine Learning, Speech/sound recognition and natural language treatment which are also substantially relevant for the industry.
Article
Full-text available
The main result of the present paper is an exact sequence which describes the group of central extensions of a connected infinite-dimensional Lie group G by an abelian group Z whose identity component is a quotient of a vector space by a discrete subgroup. A major point of this result is that it is not restricted to smoothly paracompact groups and hence applies in particular to all Banach- and Frechet-Lie groups. The exact sequence encodes in particular precise obstructions for a given Lie algebra cocycle to correspond to a locally group cocycle.
Article
Full-text available
We define the notion of strong projective limit of Banach Lie algebroids. We study the associated structures of Frechet bundles and the compatibility with the different morphisms. This kind of structures seems to be a convenient framework for various situations.
Chapter
This chapter presents the most basic results on topological vector spaces. With the exception of the last section, the scalar field over which vector spaces are defined can be an arbitrary, non-discrete valuated field K; K is endowed with the uniformity derived from its absolute value. The purpose of this generality is to clearly identify those properties of the commonly used real and complex number field that are essential for these basic results. Section 1 discusses the description of vector space topologies in terms of neighborhood bases of 0, and the uniformity associated with such a topology. Section 2 gives some means for constructing new topological vector spaces from given ones. The standard tools used in working with spaces of finite dimension are collected in Section 3, which is followed by a brief discussion of affine subspaces and hyperplanes (Section 4). Section 5 studies the extremely important notion of boundedness. Metrizability is treated in Section 6. This notion, although not overly important for the general theory, deserves special attention for several reasons; among them are its connection with category, its role in applications in analysis, and its role in the history of the subject (cf. Banach [1]). Restricting K to subfields of the complex numbers, Section 7 discusses the transition from real to complex fields and vice versa.
Article