Katherine Paston and Brilliana Harley: Maternal Letters and the Genre of Mother?s Advice by Raymond A. Anselment AMONG the conduct books popular in the early seventeenth cen-tury are several on maternal advice written by women whofound in the newly acknowledged responsibilities of motherhood the potential for personal fulfillment.1 In particular, the numerous editions of works by Elizabeth Grymeston, Dorothy Leigh, and Elizabeth Joscelin reflect the growing Protestant recognition that mothers must share with their husbands the obligation to ensure their children?s welfare.2 For any woman who has ??carried her child within her, so neere 1 Betty S. Travitsky remains among the first and foremost proponent of this view of motherhood: ??A new mother [a description now commonly accepted] was developed who was a learned, pious, and responsible woman with increased and clear-cut responsibility for the raising of her children as well as a clearly recognized right to selfdevelopment for her own sake?? (??The New Mother of the English Renaissance (1489? 1659): A Descriptive Catalogue,?? Bulletin of Research in the Humanities 82 [1979]: 64). As she notes in a subsequent essay, her characterization of motherhood comes from the title of Erasmus?s colloquy, ??The New Mother?? (??The New Mother of the English Renaissance: Her Writings on Motherhood,?? in The Lost Tradition: Mothers and Daughters in Literature, ed. Cathy N. Davidson and E. M. Broner [New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing, 1980], 33?43). 2 The fourth edition of Elizabeth Grymeston?s Miscelanea. Meditations. Memoratiues (London, 1604) was published around 1618; the nineteenth edition of Dorothy Leigh?s The Mothers Blessing (London, 1616) appeared in 1640; Elizabeth Joscelin?s The Mothers Legacie, To her Vnborne Childe (London, 1624) went through seven impressions, the last in 1635. Sometimes included in the genre of mother?s advice books are Elizabeth Clinton, countess of Lincoln, The Countesse of Lincolnes Nurserie (Oxford, 1622); Elizabeth Richardson, A Ladies Legacie to her Daughters (London, 1645); M. R., The Mothers Counsell, or, Liue within Compasse (London, 1630?); and Susanna Bell, Legacy of a Dying Mother (London, 1673). See Betty Travitsky, ed., The Paradise of Women: Writings by Englishwomen of the Renaissance (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1981), 50?68; Elaine V. Beilin, Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), 431 ? 2004 The University of North Carolina Press Tseng 2004.8.31 12:56 7159 STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY / 101:4 / sheet 77 of 122 432 Katherine Paston and Brilliana Harley her hart, and brought it forth into this world with so much bitter paine,?? Dorothy Leigh writes, the duty to nurture is undeniable: ??Will shee not instruct it in the youth, and admonish it in the age, and pray for it continually???3 The bond formed in the womb, as Elizabeth Grymeston further emphasizes, becomes a means of fulfillment: ??There is no loue so forcible as the loue of an a?ectionate mother to her naturall childe: there is no mother can either more a?ectionately shew her nature, or more naturally manifest her a?ection, than in aduising her children out of her own experience.??4 And yet, paradoxically, maternal nature and affection seem largely secondary, if not absent, in the ??true portraiture of thy mothers minde?? Grymeston leaves her son;5 nor are they strikingly apparent in the legacies of the other authors to their children.Their desire to ??shew my selfe a louing Mother, and a dutifull Wife??6 is more complexly and movingly apparent in the writing of two other women not traditionally associated with mother?s advice books, the letters of Katherine Paston (1578?1629) and Brilliana Harley (1600?43) to their sons.7 Unlike the writing of these two mothers? published counterparts, the private correspondence of each began when her firstborn left for university and was never intended for publication, so neither mother has any need to justify her advice. The other authors exploit the threat of imminent death as an occasion not only for their own self-presentation, 266?85; Sylvia Brown, ed., Women?s Writing in Stuart England: The Mothers? Legacies of Dorothy Leigh, Elizabeth Joscelin, and Elizabeth Richardson (Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing, 1999). The role Protestant writers such as Thomas Becon...