Content uploaded by Aude Noiray
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Aude Noiray on Dec 10, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Aude Noiray
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Aude Noiray on Dec 10, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Development of Coarticulation in German Children:
Articulatory Locus Equations
Background
Coarticulation, defined as varying degrees of articulatory overlap between speech seg-
ments, is a crucial mechanism for fluency. When learning to speak, children have to develop
their language’s coarticulatory patterns. No study has yet investigated CV coarticulation and
its development in German (but reanalysis for adults [1]). Tradition-
ally, acoustic Locus Equations (LE) are used to measure coarticu-
latory degree. Second formant frequencies at vowel onset and
midpoint are plotted on the y- and x-axis to obtain consonant-spe-
cific regression lines [e.g., 2, 3, 4]. Recently, LE metrics have been
successfully extended to articulation by plotting the horizontal posi-
tion of the highest point of the tongue instead of F2 [e.g. 5, 6].
Research Questions
1) What is the German coarticulation hierarchy for places of articulation in adults?
2) Do 5 year-old children already show the adult-like pattern?
3) Are vowel impacts evident only at the offset of consonants or already during the closure?
Predictions
1) More coarticulation for labials and velars is expected than for alveolars.
2) Yes, as they did in other languages [e.g., 5], but we expect more variability in children.
3) We expect traces of the vowels already in the middle of the consonant.
Elina Rubertus
a
, Dzhuma Abakarova
a
, Mark Tiede
b
, Jan Ries
a
, Aude Noiray
a
a
University of Potsdam,
b
Haskins Laboratories
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the DFG GZ: NO 1098/2-1
We thank the whole LOLA team for their great work: Helene
Killmer-Rumpf, Lisa Roehle, Liuba Carpova, Michelle
Golchert, Stefanos Tserkezis, & Stella Krüger.
Special thanks go to our adult and child participants (and their
parents) who made it easy and fun for us to collect our data.
Contact Information
Elina Rubertus
Laboratory for Oral Language Acquisition
University of Potsdam
Department Linguistics
rubertus@uni-potsdam.de
http://www.uni-potsdam.de/lola
References
[1] Iskarous, K., Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P., Recasens, D., Shadle, C. H., Saltzman, E., & Whalen, D. H. (2013).
The coarticulation/invariance scale: Mutual information as a measure of coarticulation resistance, motor synergy,
an articulatory invariance. JASA, 134.
[2] Gibson, T. & Ohde, R. N. (2007). F2 Locus equations: Phonetic descriptors of coarticulation in 17- to 22-
month-old children. JSLHR, 30.
[3] Sussman, H. M., Hoemeke, K. A., McCaffrey, H. A. (1992). Locus equations as an index of coarticulation for
place of articulation distinctions in children. JSHR, 35.
[4] Sussman, H. M., Duder, C., Dalston, E., & Cacciatore, A. (1999). An acoustic analysis of the development of
CV coarticulation: A case study. JSLHR, 42.
[5] Noiray, A., Ménard, L., & Iskarous, K. (2013). The development of motor synergies in children: ultrasound and
acoustic measurements. JASA, 133.
[6] Barbier, G., Perrier, P., Ménard, L., Payan, Y., Tiede, M.K., Perkell, J. S. (2013). Speech planning as an index
of speech motor control maturity. 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication
Association (Interspeech 2013), Lyon : France
[7] Nittrouer, S., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Neely, S. (1996). How children learn to organize their speech gestures:
Further evidence from fricative vowel syllables. JSHR, 39.
Participants
11 5-year-olds (4 f, age range: 5;00 - 5;07 y) & 4 adults (2 f, age range:
22 – 27 y), all native German speakers without known hearing or language
impairment
Stimuli
Disyllabic trochaic pseudo words in
carrier phrase: /͜aɪnə/ C
1
V
1
C
2
V
2
• V
1
always tense
• C
1
≠ C
2
18 C
1
V
1
syllables x 3 times
in each of 2 contexts (C
2
)
108 stimuli in randomized blocks
Procedure
Repetition task in SOLLAR in child-friendly set-up
• Prerecorded auditory stimuli
• Participants’ repetitions recorded with
• Microphone (acoustic signal for formant detection & synchronization)
• Ultrasound (midsagittal tongue contour for articulatory analysis)
• Video camera (lip movement and head correction)
/i:/
/b/ /y:/ /b/
/d/ + /u:/ + /d/ + /ǝ/
/g/ /a:/ /g/
/e:/
/o:/
1) Coarticulation hierarchy
Our data provide consistent evidence that the German
hierarchy of places of articulation regarding the
amount of coarticulation is
/b/ > /g/ >> /d/.
This corroborates with previous results from other
languages, suggesting this hierarchy to be universal.
Possibly because of biomechanical properties: As /b/ is
a labial consonant, the tongue is free to shape for the
upcoming vowel, allowing for a high degree of
coarticulation. /g/ is relatively free in its place of
articulation ranging from velar to palatal realizations
depending on the following vowel without affecting its
perception. For the alveolar /d/ in contrast, the tongue
is quite constrained in its shape, so anticipation of
upcoming vowels is only possible to a small extent.
2) Children’s coarticulation
The 5-year old children show exactly the same
coarticulation pattern as the adult control group.
Contrary to our expectations, their productions show
less variability than those of the adults, indicated by
higher r
2
values. However, the adult control group only
contains 4 speakers, while more variability in children
may be accounted for by a larger group size. Interest-
ingly, all consonants show a higher coarticulation
degree in children than in adults. This might be an
indication of less fine-grained articulatory movements
possibly resulting from an immature speech motor
control as suggested by the holistic theory [7].
3) Early impact of the vowel
In both cohorts we find strong impacts of the following
vowel not only at the offset of the consonant (C100),
but already at the temporal midpoint (C50).
Anticipation of the upcoming vowel thus starts early
and increases the closer we get to its midpoint (i.e.,
higher slopes for C100 than C50). Going even further
back in time would allow us to get an idea of how early
anticipatory coarticulation starts.
Traditional F2 Locus Equations
To compare these results from the articulatory domain
with the traditional measure of acoustic LEs, we are
currently working on a reliable formant detection
technique for child speech.
1. Introduction 2. Method
3. Data Analysis 5. Discussion & Conclusion
4. Results
Acoustic Processing
• Semi-automatic labeling
• Points of interest for the analysis:
• Consonant midpoint (C50)
• Consonant offset (C100)
• Vowel midpoint (V50)
Articulatory Processing
• Semi-automatic tongue contour detection at
C50, C100, & V50 using SOLLARContours in Matlab
• Extraction of horizontal position (x) of the highest
point of the tongue dorsum (TD)
Statistical Analysis
• Regression analyses for horizontal position of TD
• at C50 versus V50
• at C100 versus V50
Front Back