ArticlePDF Available

Spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large predatory sharks in Calabria (central Mediterranean, southern Italy)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

During the 2000-2009, a survey study on the spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large predatory sharks was carried out in the Calabria region. A total of 12 species were recorded and among them the blue shark Prionace glauca and the bluntnose sixgill shark Hexanchus griseus were the most common ones. Also of interest was the frequency of species such as Carcharodon carcharias, Sphyrna zygaena and Cetorhinus maximus. 57% of all reported records derived from the Tyrrhenian side of the region and 43% on the Ionian side. A significant relationship between season of the year versus number of records was found, but this could be related to the small number of observers that were active during the winter months. The presence of Sphyrna lewini is reported for the study area; this species was previously recorded only in the western part of the Mediterranean Sea. This paper also provides evidence of the second and first documented accounts of white shark predation upon Tursiops truncatus and Stenella coeruleoalba, respectively, in the Mediterranean Sea. The recovering of Ionian Sphyrna zygaena populations and the declining of Lamna nasus populations were also noted.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Key words: Ecology, biogeography, elasmobranchs, Sphyrna lewini, Carcharodon carcharias,
dolphins
INTRODUCTION
Usually at the apex of trophic chains, large
predatory sharks play an important role in the
structure and functioning of marine ecosystems
(STEVENS et al., 2000). Despite their evolutionary
and ecological success, many species are
increasingly threatened with extinction as a
During the 2000-2009, a survey study on the spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large
predatory sharks was carried out in the Calabria region. A total of 12 species were recorded and
among them the blue shark Prionace glauca and the bluntnose sixgill shark Hexanchus griseus were
the most common ones. Also of interest was the frequency of species such as Carcharodon carcharias,
Sphyrna zygaena and Cetorhinus maximus. 57% of all reported records derived from the Tyrrhenian
side of the region and 43% on the Ionian side. A significant relationship between season of the year
versus number of records was found, but this could be related to the small number of observers that
were active during the winter months. The presence of Sphyrna lewini is reported for the study area;
this species was previously recorded only in the western part of the Mediterranean Sea. This paper
also provides evidence of the second and first documented accounts of white shark predation upon
Tursiops truncatus and Stenella coeruleoalba, respectively, in the Mediterranean Sea. The recover-
ing of Ionian Sphyrna zygaena populations and the declining of Lamna nasus populations were also
noted.
result of human activities and the conservative
life history traits of this group of fish. In fact,
sharks are slow growing and late to mature,
with low fecundity (COMPAGNO et al., 2005).
These characteristics result in a very low rate of
potential population increase with little capacity
to recover from overfishing and other threats such
as pollution and habitat destruction (FOWLER et
ISSN: 0001-5113
AADRAY
ACTA ADRIAT.,
53(1): 13 - 24, 2012
UDC: 597. 311.2/4 (450-3 Kalabrija)
591.9:591.54>:597.311.2/4
Spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large predatory
sharks in Calabria (central Mediterranean, southern Italy)
Emilio SPERONE1*, Giovanni PARISE1, Agostino LEONE1, Concetta MILAZZO1,
Vincenzo CIRCOSTA1, Gloriano SANTORO1, Giuseppe PAOLILLO2,
Primo MICARELLI3 and Sandro TRIPEPI1
1 Department of Ecology, University of Calabria, Rende (CS), Italy
2 WWF Calabria, Vibo Valentia, Italy
3Aquarium Mondo Marino – Posidonia no profit Association, Massa Marittima (GR), Italy
*Corresponding author, e-mail: sperone@unical.it
14 ACTA ADRIATICA, 53(1): 13 - 24, 2012
al., 2005; VALENZUELA et al., 2008). Many papers
demonstrated that the decline of great sharks
from coastal ecosystems have caused trophic
cascades with marked ecological consequences
(BAUM & MYERS, 2004; BASCOMPTE et al., 2005;
SHEPHERD & MYERS, 2005; MYERS et al., 2007), as
has been demonstrated for all apex predators,
both terrestrial and marine (ESTES et al., 2011).
Although the Mediterranean is a semi-
enclosed sea, the shark fauna is relatively
diverse with an estimated 47 species of shark
from 17 families (COMPAGNO, 2001; COMPAGNO
et al., 2005; SERENA, 2005) plus 4 alien species
(ZENETOS et al., 2010). However, currently, there
is a lack of knowledge on their distribution.
Family Species Common
name
Maximum
length
(cm)
Trophic
level
Hexanchidae
(cow sharks) Hexanchus griseus (Bonaterre, 1788) Bluntnose
sixgill shark 480 4.3
Chinorehinidae
(bramble sharks) Echinorhinus brucus (Bonaterre, 1788) Bramble shark 300 4.4
Odontaspididae
(sand tiger sharks) Carcharias taurus (Rafinesque, 1810) Sand tiger 320 4.4
Odontaspis ferox (Risso, 1810) Smalltooth
sand tiger 410 4.2
Alopidae
(thresher sharks) Alopias superciliosus (Lowe, 1839) Bigeye thresher 461 4.2
Alopias vulpinus (Bonnaterre, 1788) Thresher shark 600 4.2
Lamnidae
(mackerel sharks) Isurus oxyrinchus (Rafinesque, 1810) Shortfin mako 400 4.3
Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788) Porbeagle 417 4.2
Carcharodon carcharias (Linnaeus, 1758) White shark 720 4.5
Carcharhinidae
(requiem sharks) Carcharhinus altimus (Springer, 1950) Bignose shark 280 4.3
Carcharhinus brachyurus (Günther, 1870) Bronze whaler 292 4.2
Carcharhinus brevipinna (Müller & Henle, 1839) Spinner shark 280 4.2
Carcharhinus falciformis (Müller & Henle, 1839) Silky shark 350 4.2
Carcharhinus limbatus (Müller & Henle, 1839) Blacktip shark 255 4.2
Carcharhinus obscurus (Lesueur, 1818) Dusky shark 420 4.2
Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827) Sandbar shark 300 4.1
Prionace glauca (Linnaeus, 1758) Blue shark 380 4.1
Sphyrnidae
(hammerhead
sharks)
Sphyrna lewini (Griffith & Smith, 1834) Scalloped
hammerhead 420 4.1
Sphyrna mokarran (Rüppell, 1837) Great
hammerhead 600 4.3
Sphyrna zygaena (Linnaeus, 1758) Smooth
hammerhead 400 4.2
Table 1. Large predatory sharks occurring in the Mediterranean Sea
15
Sperone et al.: Spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large predatory sharks in Calabria
Of the 47 autochthonous species 20 can be
considered top predators (Table 1). Large sharks
historically occurred in the entire Mediterranean
Sea although in recent decades they seemed to
be restricted to the eastern and southern part
or to offshore pelagic waters though with very
low numbers (MEGALOFONOU et al., 2005a, b;
PSOMADAKIS et al., 2009). Available evidence
indicates that large predatory sharks in the
Mediterranean Sea are generally declining in
abundance, diversity and range (FOWLER et al.,
2005; FERRETTI et al., 2008).
Only 3 species seemed to be regularly
observed: Prionace glauca, Isurus oxyrinchus
and Alopias vulpinus; the remaining species
Balearic region, the northern Adriatic and the
Tyrrhenian Sea (SIMS, 2003; SIMS et al., 2003). A
small population of the smalltooth sand tiger
shark Odontaspis ferox seems to be resident in
a particular area off Lebanon (FERGUSSON et al.,
2008).
The main objective of this study was to
describe the spatiotemporal distribution of
large predatory sharks in Calabria (southern
Italy, central Mediterranean). Different sources
of information were used to determine shark
distribution in the study area, in particular
opportunistic fishing surveys and an extensive
bibliographic search of the scientific literature.
Spatiotemporal distribution data in the study area
* according to Musick et al., (2004). Legend: Ba = Bathydal; Be = Benthopelagic; C = Coastal; O = Oceanic; P =
Pelagic)
Species N of records Preferential habitat*
Hexanchus griseus (Bonnaterre, 1788) 17 Be, Ba
Prionace glauca (Linnaeus, 1758) 17 P, O
Carcharodon carcharias (Linnaeus, 1758) 8 Be, C, O
Sphyrna zygaena (Linnaeus, 1758) 7 Be, C, O
Cetorhinus maximus (Gunnerus, 1765) 7 Be, C, O
Alopias vulpinus (Bonnaterre, 1788) 5 P, C, O
Isurus oxyrinchus (Rafinesque, 1810) 4 P, C, O
Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788) 2 P, C, O
Odontaspis ferox (Risso, 1810) 1 Be, Ba
Carcharhinus brevipinna (Müller and Henle, 1839) 1 Be, C
Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827) 1 Be, C
Sphyrna lewini (Griffith and Smith, 1834) 1 Be, C, O
Table 2. Large predatory sharks confirmed for the Calabria region
have been only occasionally observed (SIMS et
al., 2000; SOLDO & JARDAS, 2000; FOWLER et al.,
2005; MEGALOFONOU et al., 2005a, b; FERGUSSON et
al., 2008; PSOMADAKIS et al., 2009; FERRETTI et al.,
2008; ZENETOS et al., 2010). In addition, within the
Mediterranean Sea the presence of these sharks
is not homogenous (SERENA, 2005) and some
areas were identified as critical habitats for great
sharks. For example, Tunisian waters provide a
nursery area for the white shark Carcharodon
carcharias (FERGUSSON, 1996; SAIDI et al., 2005).
Aggregations of basking shark Cetorhinus
maximus have been observed in the northern
are reported for each species. Furthermore, some
ecological, bio-geographical and conservationist
considerations are made; reports of predation of
white shark versus cetaceans in the study area
are also provided.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Study area
Calabria is at the very south of the Italian
peninsula. The region is a long and narrow
peninsula, which stretches 248 km in the North/
16 ACTA ADRIATICA, 53(1): 13 - 24, 2012
South direction, with a maximum width of 110
km. It lies in the centre of the Mediterranean
Sea (Fig. 1), between the Tyrrhenian and the
Ionian Seas, and it is separated from Sicily
by the Strait of Messina. Calabria, together
with Sicily and the Tunisian coast, divides the
Mediterranean Sea into western and eastern
parts. The Tyrrhenian side of Calabria lays in the
western Mediterranean, while the Ionian side in
the eastern Mediterranean.
et al., 2005; SERENA, 2005). All data that directly
or indirectly provided information about the
presence of these sharks in the study area were
considered. Particularly, we divided our records
into the following categories:
- sightings, when sharks were directly observed
in the wild
- captures, referred to sharks caught onboard
fishing vessels or observed in fishmonger’s
- strandings, referred to dead sharks founded
inshore or on the seashore
- indirect observations, such as feeding
remains.
RESULTS
Of 20 species of large predatory shark that
occur in the Mediterranean basin (DE METRIO et
al., 1984; MEGALOFONOU et al., 2005a, b; FERRETTI
et al., 2008; PSOMADAKIS et al., 2009) we confirmed
for the study area the presence of 11 species,
plus the presence of Cetorhinus maximus.
In Table 1 the checklist of our 70 records
is reported. 68.58% of the records referred
to sharks caught onboard fishing vessels or
observed in fishmongers’, 22.85% of sharks
were directly observed in the wild, 5.72% were
dead sharks found inshore or on seashore and
2.85% were indirect observations. In Figure 2
are reported the typologies of records for each
species of large predatory shark for the Calabrian
region. The blue shark Prionace glauca and
the bluntnose sixgill shark Hexanchus griseus
were the most common species observed in
the study area, while Carcharodon carcharias,
Sphyrna zygaena, Cetorhinus maximus, Alopias
vulpinus and Isurus oxyrhincus were the next
Fig. 2. Typologies of records of large predatory sharks
reported for the study area
Fig. 1. Location map of the study area
Data collection
Records of large predatory sharks presented in
this work come from nine years of opportunistic
fishing surveys, from 2000 to 2009, and by
various collaborations with fishermen, fisheries
departments and marine police. In particular,
commercial and recreational fisheries landings
and sighting records were considered. Also a
bibliographical search in the scientific literature
and public and private archives was performed.
According to FERRETTI et al. (2008), large
predatory sharks were defined as species with
a maximum length > 2 m and estimated trophic
level > 4 (in sensu CORTÉS, 1999). In this study
we also included data about the presence of
Cetorhinus maximus, the world’s second-largest
fish, although it is not properly a predatory
shark because it feeds on zooplankton. Shark
identification and all common names used in this
paper followed FAO nomenclature (COMPAGNO
17
Sperone et al.: Spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large predatory sharks in Calabria
most abundant ones. The remaining five
species (Lamna nasus, Carharhinus brevipinna,
Carcharhinus plumbeus, Odontaspis ferox and
Sphyrna lewini) were reported only once or twice.
Looking at the spatial distribution of sharks,
57% of records occurred along the Tyrrhenian
side of the Calabrian region, while 43% were on
the Ionian side. The spatial distribution of the
records is shown in Figure 3. Only three species
(Prionace glauca, Hexanchus griseus, Cetorhinus
maximus) are homogeneously distributed on
both sides. Carcharodon carcharias and Isurus
oxyrhincus were most often observed along the
Tyrrhenian side, while Sphyrna zygaena and
Alopias vulpinus were most often observed
along the Ionian side. However, if we look
at the distribution of the other five species,
Carcharhinus plumbeus was found only in the
Ionian side of Calabria, while Carcharhinus
brevipinna, Lamna nasus, Odontaspis ferox
and Sphyrna lewini were found only in the
Tyrrhenian side of the region. We also correlated
the number of records versus the seasons of the
year; although a high number of records (56.6%)
has been reported for the summer season (Figure
4) with a significant relationship between these
two variables (c2=18.343; d.f.=3; P=0.0004),
this could be related more to the small number
of observers that were active during the winter
months rather than to an effective temporal
absence of sharks.
Interesting information come from the shark-
bitten carcasses of two odontocetes (Figure
5). The first record was a bottlenose dolphin
Tursiops truncatus found in Soverato (Ionian
side of Calabria) on 03 July 2008. Bites were
Fig. 5. White shark bites on cetaceans in the study area:
bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus found in Sove-
rato on 03 July 2008 (a); striped dolphin Stenella
coeruleoalba found in Melito di Porto Salvo on 16
August 2009 (b)
b
Fig. 3. Distribution of records along Tyrrhenian and Ionian
sides of the study area
Fig. 4. Distribution of records among seasons for a
calendar year
a
18 ACTA ADRIATICA, 53(1): 13 - 24, 2012
located in the urogenital region and on the
abdomen. The second record was a striped
dolphin Stenella coeruleoalba found in Melito
di Porto Salvo (Ionian side of the region) on 16
August 2009. In this case, bites were located
on the dorsum and on the abdomen. Following
methods on the dental morphology of bites
(LONG & JONES, 1996) led to identification of
white shark Carcharodon carcharias.
DISCUSSION
The 12 species of shark confirmed for
the Calabrian region represent 57,14% of the
species of large predatory sharks reported for the
Mediterranean Sea (COMPAGNO, 2001; COMPAGNO
et al., 2005; SERENA, 2005). This shark biodiversity
could be correlated to the overall faunistic
richness and diversity of marine coastal habitats
present in the study area. Among the reported
species, Prionace glauca and Hexanchus
griseus were the most common. The dominance
of Prionace glauca is consistent with other
studies (DE METRIO et al., 1984; MEGALOFONOU
et al., 2005a, b; PSOMADAKIS et al., 2009). However,
comparison of historical data from swordfish
fisheries with a more recent study has revealed
that the catch rates in the central Mediterranean
Sea over the last 20 years have decreased by
an average of 38.5% (DE METRIO et al., 1984;
MEGALOFONOU et al., 2005b). Hexanchus griseus
is also a common species in the Mediterranean;
in particular, it is more common in the western
basin, while it is less common in the eastern
basin (COMPAGNO et al., 2005; MEGALOFONOU et
al., 2005a; SERENA, 2005). In Calabria, this species
showed a homogeneous distribution on both the
Tyrrhenian and Ionian sides of the region.
Records of the white shark Carcharodon
carcharias in Calabria were more frequent along
the Tyrrhenian side than the Ionian side. Our
data confirm the general distribution described
for this species in the Mediterranean Sea. In fact,
it is known that white sharks were observed from
all national coasts of the western Mediterranean
basin, while infrequent records are known for
the eastern basin (FERGUSSON, 1996). Recently
KABASAKAL & ÖZGÜR GEDIKOGLU (2008)
reported the capture of two newborns of white
shark from Turkish waters of the north Aegean
Sea. Further information about the feeding
ecology of this species in the Mediterranean
Sea comes from the records of the two dolphins
bitten by white sharks along the Ionian side of
the Calabria region. It is known that the white
shark is a versatile predator and scavenges
upon a wide spectrum of prey. Stomach
content data demonstrated that this shark is
piscivorous at all size classes despite a shift with
maturity towards larger prey including marine
mammals, principally pinnipeds (FERGUSSON
et al., 2000; ESTRADA et al., 2003; MARTIN et al.,
2005; ESTRADA et al., 2006; SPERONE et al., 2010).
In the Mediterranean Sea pinnipeds are scarce
or essentially absent and white sharks feed
upon odontocetes or large pelagic fish, and
sporadically upon chelonians (FERGUSSON, 1996;
FERGUSSON et al., 2000). Our data represent the
second documented account of white shark
predation (or possibile scavenging) upon Tursiops
truncatus and the first documented account of
Stenella coeruleoalba for the Mediterranean
Sea. The morphology and position of the bites
on the body of the two dolphins follow the
patterns described by LONG & JONES (1996).
Data about predator-prey interactions between
white sharks and Stenella coeruleoalba were
not available for the study area, while only one
confirmed record about predation upon Tursiops
truncatus has been reported (FERGUSSON, 1996).
Sphyrna zygaena was the next most abundant
species in the study area. This species was
more frequent along the Ionian side of the
Calabria region and this reflects the general
trend described by FERRETTI et al. (2008) for the
Mediterranean Sea. Populations of this shark
had the fastest decline among the investigated
species by various authors. In particular, they
started to decline in the Tyrrhenian Sea in the
early 20th Century. From 1995 FERRETTI et al.
(2008) found no more records of hammerhead
sharks in Ionian investigated longlines. Our data
demonstrate a recovery for the populations of
this shark on the Ionian side of Calabria. All
our records refer to sharks observed or captured
in coastal areas such as the specimen shown
19
Sperone et al.: Spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large predatory sharks in Calabria
in Figure 6 and observed inshore in Soverato
(Ionian side of Calabria) on 07 September 2008.
A newborn of the species was also observed at
the same location.
Basking shark Cetorhinus maximus showed a
homogeneous distribution along the coasts of the
entire Calabria region. The number of records
support the opinion that it is a relatively rare but
constant species, as also reported for other areas
(SIMS et al., 2000; SOLDO & JARDAS, 2000). The
highest occurrence of the basking shark has been
observed from spring until autumn. This could
be related to zooplankton abundance in this time
period (SIMS & QUALE, 1998).
Records of Alopias vulpinus were distributed
over the entire Calabria region, with the highest
occurrence along the Ionian side. This pattern is
in accordance with other reports (MEGALOFONOU
et al., 2005a, b) in which a higher number of
records of the species was observed more for
the eastern Mediterranean than for the western
Fig. 6. Hammerhead shark Sphyrna zygaena observed inshore in Soverato on 07 September 2008
part. However, drastic declines were detected
and documented by FERRETTI et al. (2008) in the
Ionian Sea mainly due to recreational catches.
Records of other lamnoid shark species
(Isurus oxyrinchus and Lamna nasus) showed
a higher frequency along the Tyrrhenian side
of Calabria, as observed for the white shark.
Compared to other reports for the Mediterranean
Sea, the number of Calabrian records is definitely
lower than the number of records for other
Mediterranean areas (SOLDO & JARDAS, 2000;
MEGALOFONOU et al., 2005a, b). FERRETTI et al.
(2008) affirmed that Lamnids had the second-
largest declines after hammerhead sharks. In
particular, Lamna nasus showed the most serious
depletion. A strong reduction in abundance and
geographical distribution in this species has
been observed, and its actual presence in the
Mediterranean Sea appears to be restricted to the
central basin (STEVENS et al., 2000).
The other four species were reported
20 ACTA ADRIATICA, 53(1): 13 - 24, 2012
only once in Calabria. Odontaspis ferox was
confirmed for the central-western Mediterranean
and it is reported as occasionally caught in
Italian waters of the Calabrian Tyrrhenian Sea
(FERGUSSON et al., 2008). Occurrences eastwards
of the Ionian Sea were never reported. Our
record along the Tyrrhenian side of Calabria
and the absence of records along the Ionian
side seems to confirm this. The few records of
requiem sharks (Carcharhinus brevipinna and
Carcharhinus plumbeus) could be explained,
according to RELINI et al. (2000) and FERRETTI
et al. (2008) as a consequence of a rapid decline
of these sharks. Requiem sharks are predators
inhabiting coastal environments, and sharks that
prefer these habitats may have declined more
precipitously and earlier. Finally, of particular
biogeographical value is the record of Sphyrna
lewinii. In fact this species was known only for
the western Mediterranean Sea, from Gibraltar
to the Balearic Islands (COMPAGNO et al., 2005;
SERENA, 2005). The specimen we observed in
San Lucido (Tyrrhenian side of Calabria) on
15 July 2008 is not only the first record of
this species for Italian waters, but also the
easternmost record for the species in the entire
Mediterranean (SERENA, 2005).
The absence of the species Carcharias taurus,
Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus obscurus
and Sphyrna mokarran in the study area is a
consequence of their occasional presence in the
entire Mediterranean Sea (BOERO & CARLI, 1977;
COMPAGNO et al., 2005; SERENA, 2005). The species
Alopias superciliosus, Carcharhinus altimus,
Carcharhinus brachyurus, Carcharhinus
falciformis and Echinorhinus brucus have
been previously reported for the western
Mediterranean (MORENO & HOYOS, 1983; VACCHI
et al., 1996; ORSI RELINI, 1998; GOLANI et al., 2002;
SERENA, 2005: ZENETOS et al., 2010) and for this
reason they were not observed in the study area.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study provides a reference point for
the knowledge and assessment of the status of
large predatory pelagic sharks in the central
Mediterranean Sea. Until now there has been
little documentation about the presence of these
fish in this area. Due to the lack of existing
data, no further speculation could be made.
However, these data could represent a starting
point for planning conservation measures.
Particularly remarkable is on one hand the
probable recovering of Ionian Sphyrna zygaena
populations and, on the other hand, the declining
of Tyrrhenian Lamna nasus populations. Long-
term monitoring programs should be established
in order to acquire further and more useful
information for the realization of conservation
plans for these sharks in an area (the Calabrian
region) that represents an exchange channel
between the western and eastern Mediterranean
Sea.
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank fishermen, coworkers and students
who collaborated during sampling procedures:
G. ALOISE, F. COPPOLA, G. CAMIGLIANO, D.P.
CUGLIARI, M. MAZZA, N. MICHELIZZI, T.
MINGOZZI, M. SPERONE, F. ZAPPIA. Authors are
also grateful to Dr. F.G. SPERONE for the revision
of the English text.
REFERENCES
BASCOMPTE, J., C.J. MELIÀN & E. SALA. 2005.
Interaction strength combinations and the
overfishing of a marine food web. P. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 102: 5443-5447.
BAUM, J.K. & R.A. MYERS. 2004. Shifting
baselines and the decline of pelagic sharks
in the Gulf of Mexico. Ecol. Lett., 7: 135-
145.
BOERO, F. & C. CARLI. 1977. Prima segnalazione
Mediterranea di Sphyrna mokarran (First
report on Sphyrna mokarran in the
Mediterranean) (Rüppel, 1837) (Selachii,
Sphyrnidae). Boll. Mus. Ist. Univ. Genova,
45: 91-93.
COMPAGNO, L.J.V. 2001. Sharks of the World.
An annotated and illustrated catalogue
of the shark species known to date.
Volume 2. Bullhead, mackerel and carpet
sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes
21
Sperone et al.: Spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large predatory sharks in Calabria
and Orectolobiformes). FAO Species
Catalogue for Fisheries Purposes No. 1,
Vol. 2 FAO, Rome.
COMPAGNO, L.J.V., M. DANDO & S. FOWLER.
2005. Sharks of the world. Harper&Collins
Publishers Ltd, London.
CORTÉS, E. 1999. Standardized diet
compositions and trophic levels. J. Mar.
Sci., 56: 707-717.
DE METRIO, G., G. PETROSINO, C. MONTANARO,
A. MATARRESE, M. LENTI & E. CECERE.
1984. Survey on summer-autumn
population of Prionace glauca L. (Pisces,
Chondrichthyes) during the four year
period 1978–1981 and its incidence
on swordfish (Xiphias gladius L.) and
albacore (Thunnus alalunga (Bonn))
fishing. Oebalia, X: 105–116.
ESTES, J.A., J. TERBORGH, J.S. BRASHARES,
M.E. POWER, J. BERGER, W.J. BOND, S.R.
CARPENTER, T.E. ESSINGTON, R.D. HOLT,
J.B.C. JACKSON, R.J. MARQUIS, L. OKSANEN,
T. OKSANEN, R.T. PAINE, E.K. PIKITCH, W.J.
RIPPLE, S.A. SANDIN, M. SCHEFFER, T.W.
SCHOENER, J.B. SHURIN, A.R.E. SINCLAIR,
M.E. SOULÉ, R. VIRTANEN & D.A. WARDLE.
2011. Trophic Downgrading of Planet
Earth. Science, 333 (6040): 301-306.
ESTRADA, J.A., A.N. RICE, M.E. LUTCAVAGE
& G.B. SKOMAL. 2003. Predicting trophic
position in sharks of the North-west
Atlantic Ocean using stable isotope
analysis. J. Mar. Biol. Associ. UK, 83:
1347-1350.
ESTRADA, J.A., A.N. RICE, L. J. NATANSON & G.B.
SKOMAL. 2006. Use of isotopic analysis of
vertebrae in reconstructing ontogenetic
feeding ecology in white sharks. Ecology,
87: 829-834.
FERGUSSON, I.K. 1996. Distribution and
autoecology of the white shark in
the eastern North Atlantic Ocean and
Mediterranean Sea. In: A.P. Klimley
& D.G. Ainley (Editors). Great White
Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon
carcharias. Academic Press, San Diego.
pp. 321-345
FERGUSSON, I.K., L.J.V. COMPAGNO & M.A.
MARKS. 2000. Predation by white sharks
Carcharodon carcharias (Chondrichthyes:
Lamnidae) upon chelonians, with new
records from the Mediterranean Sea and
a first record of the ocean sunfish Mola
mola (Osteichthyes: Molidae) as stomach
contents. Environ. Biol. Fish., 58: 447-
453.
FERGUSSON, I.K., K.J. GRAHAM & L.J.V.
COMPAGNO. 2008. Distribution, abundance
and biology of the smalltooth sandtiger
shark Odontaspis ferox (Risso, 1810)
(Lamniformes: Odontaspididae). Environ.
Biol. Fish., 81: 207–228.
FERRETTI, F., R.A. MYERS, F. SERENA & H.K.
LOTZE. 2008. Loss of Large Predatore
Sharks from the Mediterranean Sea.
Conserv. Biol., 22(4): 952-964.
FOWLER, S.R., R.D. CAVANAGH, M. CAMHI, G.H.
BURGESS, G.M. CAILLIET, S.V. FORDHAM,
C.A. SIMPFENDORFER & J.A. MUSICK. 2005.
Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: the Status
of the Chondrichthyan Fishes. IUCN SSC
Shark Specialist Group. IUCN. Gland,
Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
GOLANI, D., L. ORSI RELINI, E. MASSUTI & J.P.
QUIGNARD. 2002. CIESM Atlas of Exotic
Species in the Mediterranean. Vol. 1.
Fishes F. Briand Ed., Monaco.
KABASAKAL, H. & S. ÖZGÜR GEDIKOGLU.
2008. Two new-born great white sharks,
Carcharodon carcharias (Linnaeus, 1758)
(Lamniformes; Lamnidae) from Turkish
waters of the north Aegean Sea. Acta
Adriat., 49 (2): 125-135.
LONG, D.J. & R.E. JONES. 1996. White shark
Predation ans Scavenging on Cetaceans
in the Eastern North Pacific Ocean. In:
A.P. Klimley and D.G. Ainley (Editors).
Great White Sharks: The Biology of
Carcharodon carcharias. Academic Press,
San Diego. pp. 293-307.
MARTIN, A.R., N. HAMMERSCHALAG, R.S.
COLLIER & C. FALLOWS. 2005. Predatory
behaviour of white sharks (Carcharodon
carcharias) at Seal Island, South Africa.
22 ACTA ADRIATICA, 53(1): 13 - 24, 2012
J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 85: 1125–1135.
MEGALOFONOU, P., D. DAMALAS & C.
YANNOPOULOS. 2005a. Composition and
abundance of pelagic shark by-catch in
the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Cybium,
29(2): 135-140.
MEGALOFONOU, P., C. YANNOPOULOS, D.
DAMALAS, G. DE METRIO, M. DEFLORIO,
J.M. DE LA SERNA & D. MACIAS. 2005b.
Incidental catch and estimated discards
of pelagic sharks from the swordfish and
tuna fisheries in the Mediterranean Sea.
Fish. Bull., 103: 620–634.
MORENO, J.A. & A. HOYOS. 1983. Carcharhinus
acarenatus, nov. sp., noveau requin
Carcharhinidae de l’Atlantique nord-
oriental et de la Méditerranée occidentale.
Cybium, 7 (1): 57-64.
MUSICK, J.A., M.M. HARBIN & L.J.V. COMPAGNO.
2004. Historical zoogeography of the
Selachii. In: J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick
and M.R. Eithaus (Editors). Biology of
sharks and their relatives. CRC Press,
Bca Raton, Florida. pp. 33-78.
MYERS, R.A., J.K. BAUM, T. SHEPHERD, S.P.
POWER & C.H. PETERSON. 2007. Cascading
effects of the loss of apex predatory
sharks from a coastal ocean. Science,
315: 1846-1850.
ORSI RELINI, L. 1998. Carcharhinus
brachyurus (Gunther, 1870) nel Museo
dell’Istituto di Zoologia, Università
di Genova (Carcharhinus brachyurus
(Gunther, 1870) in the Zoological
Museum, University of Genova, Italy).
Boll. Mus. Ist. Biol. Univ. Genova,
62-63: 93-98.
PSOMADAKIS, P.N., N. MAIO & M. VACCHI.
2009. The chondrichthyan biodiversity in
the Gulf of Naples (SW Italy, Tyrrhenian
Sea): An historical overview. Cybium,
33(3): 199-209.
RELINI, G., F. BIAGI, F. SERENA, A. BELLUSCIO,
M.T. SPEDICATO, P. RINELLI, M.C. FOLLESA,
C. PICCINETTI, N. UNGARO, L. SION & D.
LEVI. 2000. Selachians fished by otter
trawl in the Italian Seas. Biol. Mar.
Medit., 7: 347–384.
SAIDI, B., M.N. BRADAI, A. BOUAIN, O.
GUELORGET & C. CAPAPÉ. 2005. Capture
of a pregnant female white shark,
Carcharodon carcharias (Lamnidae), in
the Gulf of Gabès (southern Tunisia,
central Mediterranean) with comments
on oophagy in sharks. Cybium, 29 (3):
303-307.
SERENA, F. 2005. Field identification Guide to
the sharks and rays of the Mediterranean
and Black Sea. FAO Species Identification
Guide for Fishery Purpose. FAO, Rome.
SHEPHERD, T.D. & R.A. MYERS. 2005. Direct
and indirect fishery effects on small
coastal elasmobranches in the northern
Gulf of Mexico. Ecol. Lett., 8: 1095-
1104.SIMS, D.W. 2003. Tractable models for
testing theories about natural strategies:
foraging behaviour and habitat selection
of free-ranging sharks. J. Fish Biol.,
63(Suppl. A): 53–73.
SIMS, D.W. & W.A. QUAYLE. 1998. Selective
foranging behaviour of basking sharks on
zooplankton in a small-scale front. Nature,
393: 460-464.
SIMS, D.W., E.J. SOUTHALL, W.A. QUAYLE &
A.M. FOX. 2000. Annual social behaviour
of basking sharks associated with coastal
front areas. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 267:
1897–1904.
SIMS, D.W., E.J. SOUTHALL, A.J. RICHARDSON,
P.C. REID & METCALFE, J.D. 2003. Seasonal
movements and behaviour of basking
sharks from archival tagging: no evidence
of winter hibernation. Mar. Ecol. Prog.
Ser., 248: 187–196.
SOLDO, A. & I. JARDAS. 2000. Large sharks in
the Eastern Adriatic. In: M. Vacchi, G. La
Mesa, F. Serena & B. Seret (Editors), Proc.
4th Europ. Elasm. Assoc. Meet., Livorno,
(Italy) 2000. pp. 141-155. ICRAM, ARPAT
and SFI.
SPERONE, E., P. MICARELLI, S. ANDREOTTI,
S. SPINETTI, A. ANDREANI, F. SERENA, E.
BRUNELLI & S. TRIPEPI. 2010. Social
interactions among bait-attracted white
23
Sperone et al.: Spatiotemporal patterns of distribution of large predatory sharks in Calabria
sharks at Dyer Island (South Africa). Mar.
Biol. Res., 6 (4): 408-414.
STEVENS, J.D., R. BONFIL, N.K. DUVLY & P.A.
WALKER. 2000.
The effects of fishing on sharks,
rays, and chimaeras (Chondrichthyans), and
the implications for marine ecosystem. J.
Mar. Sci., 57: 476-494.
VACCHI, M., F. SERENA & V. BIAGI. 1996. Cattura
di Carcharhinus brachyurus (Gunther,
1870) (Pisces, Selachii, Carcharhinidae)
nel Mar Tirreno Settentrionale (Capture of
Carcharhinus brachyurus (Gunther, 1870)
(Pisces, Selachii, Carcharhinidae) in the
northern Tirrenian Sea). Biol. Mar. Medit.,
3 (1): 389-390.
VALENZUELA, A., C. BUSTAMANTE & L. LAMILLA.
2008. Morphological characteristics of five
bycatch sharks caught by southern Chilean
demersal longline fisheries. Sci. Mar. 72(2):
231-237.
ZENETOS, A., S. GOFAS, M. VERLAQUE, M.E.
CINAR, E. GARCIA RASO, C.N. BIANCHI,
C.MORRI, E. AZZURRO, M. BILECENOGLU,
C. FROGLIA, I. SIOKOU, D. VIOLANTI, A.
SFRISO, G. SAN MARTIN, A. GIANDGRANDE,
T. KATAGAN, E. BALLESTEROS, A. RAMOS
ESPLA, F. MASTROTOTARO, O. OCANA, A.
ZINGONE, M.C. GAMBI & N. STREFTARIS.
2010. Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea
by 2010. A contribution to the application
of European Union’s Marine Strategy
Framework Directive (MSFD). Part I.
Spatial distribution. Medit. Mar. Sci. 11(2):
381-493.
Received: 02 September 2010
Accepted: 17 January 2012
24 ACTA ADRIATICA, 53(1): 13 - 24, 2012
Prostorno vremenski modeli raspodjele velikih morskih pasa
u Kalabriji (srednji Mediteran, južna Italija)
Emilio SPERONE1*, Giovanni PARISE , Agostino LEONE1, Concetta MILAZZO1,
Vincenzo CIRCOSTA1, Gloriano SANTORO1, Giuseppe PAOLILLO2,
Primo MICARELLI3 i Sandro TRIPEPI1
1Odsjek ekologije, Sveučilište u Kalabriji, Rende (CS), Italija
2WWF Kalabrija, Vibo Valentia, Italija
3Akuarij Morski svijet – Neprofitna udruga Posidonia, Massa Marittima (GR), Italija
*Kontakt adresa, e-mail: sperone@unical.it
SAŽETAK
U razdoblju od 2000 do 2009, provedeno je istraživanje prostorno-vremenskih obrazaca
raspodjele velikih grabežljivih morskih pasa u talijanskoj regiji Calabria. Ukupno je zabilježeno
12 vrsta, te su među njima najčešće bili zastupljeni morski pas modrulj Prionace glauca i glavonja
Hexanchus griseus. Zanimljiva je i učestalost vrsta kao što su velika bijela psina Carcharodon
carcharias, mlat Sphyrna zygaena i psina golema Cetorhinus maximus. Od svih prijavljenih nalaza
57% je ostvareno na Tirenskoj strani regije, a 43% na Jonskoj strani. Ustanovljena je značajna
povezanost između godišnjih doba u odnosu na broj zapisa, ali to bi moglo bi se moglo odnositi
na mali broj promatrača koji su bili aktivni tijekom zimskih mjeseci. Prisutnost Sphyrna lewini je
ustanovljena na istraživanom području: ova vrsta je prethodno bila zabilježena samo u zapadnom
dijelu Sredozemnog mora.U radu se također navodi prvi i drugi dokumentirani nalaz bijelog
morskog psa kao grabežljivca vrste dobrog dupina Tursiops truncatus i plavobijelog dupina Stenella
coeruleoalba u Sredozemnom moru. Također je primjećen oporavak jonske populacije mlata
Sphyrna zygaena i pad populacije kučine Lamna nasus.
Ključne riječi: ekologija, bio-geografija, elasmobranhije, mlat Sphyrna lewini, velika bijela psina
Carcharodon carcharias, dupini
... As JAMBURA et al. (2012) reported a single juvenile in Gulf of Piran (northern Adriatic) during December, such argument requires more attention. On the other hand, data on C. plumbeus in the Ionian Sea is very scarce with only a few recent records (SPERONE et al., 2012;TIRALONGO et al., 2012). Rapid decline of requiem sharks, including C. plumbeus, in the Ionian Sea is already emphasized (SPERONE et al., 2012). ...
... On the other hand, data on C. plumbeus in the Ionian Sea is very scarce with only a few recent records (SPERONE et al., 2012;TIRALONGO et al., 2012). Rapid decline of requiem sharks, including C. plumbeus, in the Ionian Sea is already emphasized (SPERONE et al., 2012). Such lack of records, especially neonates and juveniles, does not favor the possibility that our individual originates from not-yet described nursery area in the Ionian Sea. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper is describing a new finding of Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1927) caught at the insular shelves off the Sazan Island at the depth of 120 m, which is the southernmost record for a sandbar shark in the Adriatic Sea. The individual had a partially healed umbilical scar and is considered as neonatal. Examined shark appeared in good body condition with showed no macroscopic signs of diseases or macroscopic parasites. Detailed morphometric measurements are compared with four neonate and juvenile specimens from the north and central Adriatic Sea and are provided in the paper. Despite it is not possible to establish a certain conclusion on whether our specimen was born in the studied area or elsewhere, presented finding provides the very first evidence that neonatal sandbar sharks can be found along the coast of Albania. Knowing the exact locations and movements of both neonates and juveniles is of high importance for the effective long-term in-situ conservation.
... As JAMBURA et al. (2012) reported a single juvenile in Gulf of Piran (northern Adriatic) during December, such argument requires more attention. On the other hand, data on C. plumbeus in the Ionian Sea is very scarce with only a few recent records (SPERONE et al., 2012;TIRALONGO et al., 2012). Rapid decline of requiem sharks, including C. plumbeus, in the Ionian Sea is already emphasized (SPERONE et al., 2012). ...
... On the other hand, data on C. plumbeus in the Ionian Sea is very scarce with only a few recent records (SPERONE et al., 2012;TIRALONGO et al., 2012). Rapid decline of requiem sharks, including C. plumbeus, in the Ionian Sea is already emphasized (SPERONE et al., 2012). Such lack of records, especially neonates and juveniles, does not favor the possibility that our individual originates from not-yet described nursery area in the Ionian Sea. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper is describing a new finding of Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1927) caught at the insular shelves off the Sazan Island at the depth of 120 m, which is the southernmost record for a sandbar shark in the Adriatic Sea. The individual had a partially healed umbilical scar and is considered as neonatal. Examined shark appeared in good body condition with showed no macroscopic signs of diseases or macroscopic parasites. Detailed morphometric measurements are compared with four neonate and juvenile specimens from the north and central Adriatic Sea and are provided in the paper. Despite it is not possible to establish a certain conclusion on whether our specimen was born in the studied area or elsewhere, presented finding provides the very first evidence that neonatal sandbar sharks can be found along the coast of Albania. Knowing the exact locations and movements of both neonates and juveniles is of high importance for the effective long-term in-situ conservation.
... In spite of a long history of sightings, however, the Mediterranean white shark population is still rather poorly known in terms of provenance [6] and ecology [7]. That said, C. carcharias is generally considered to be the unrivalled elasmobranch apex predator of the Mediterranean Sea [8], as it is worldwide [9]. More specifically, recent research suggests that the Mediterranean white sharks are tertiary piscivores that feed at a significantly higher trophic level than other co-occurring macropredatory elasmobranchs such as Hexanchus griseus and Isurus oxyrinchus [10], but episodes of predation and scavenging on marine mammals have also been observed and/or inferred from stomach content analyses [11][12][13]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, is the main top predator of the present-day Mediter-ranean Sea. The deep past of C. carcharias in the Mediterranean is witnessed by a rather conspicuous, mostly Pliocene fossil record. Here, we provide a synthesis of the palaeobiology and palaeoecology of the Mediterranean white sharks. Phenetically modern white shark teeth first appeared around the Miocene-Pliocene transition in the Pacific, and soon after in the Mediterranean. Molecular phyloge-netic analyses support an origin of the Mediterranean white shark population from the dispersal of Australian/Pacific palaeopopulations, which may have occurred through the Central American Sea-way. Tooth dimensions suggest that the Mediterranean white sharks could have grown up to about 7 m total length during the Pliocene. A richer-than-today marine mammal fauna was likely pivotal in supporting the Mediterranean white sharks through the Pliocene and most of the Quaternary. White sharks have seemingly become more common as other macropredators declined and disappeared, notwithstanding the concurrent demise of many potential prey items in the context of the latest Pliocene and Quaternary climatic and environmental perturbations of the Mediterranean region. The overall generalist trophic habits of C. carcharias were likely crucial for securing ecological success in the highly variable Mediterranean scenario by allowing the transition to a mostly piscivorous diet as the regional marine mammal fauna shrank.
... social media data) that provided insights into the historical distribution of the species across the basin (Bargnesi et al., 2022;Mancusi et al., 2020). Examining records available in the scientific literature, newborns, juveniles, and adults of I. oxyrinchus have been reported in different sectors of the Mediterranean Sea (Ergüden et al. 2022;Mancusi et al., 2023;Panayiotou et al., 2020;Saidi et al., 2019;Sperone et al., 2012;Udovičić et al., 2018). A considerable proportion of these catches consisted of immature individuals caught in the northeastern sector of the basin, mostly off the Turkish coast, suggesting that this area could host breeding or nursery grounds for the species (Ergüden et al. 2022). ...
Article
The shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) is the second most fishery-exploited pelagic shark in the Mediterranean Sea, thus its conservation status is a cause for concern. Despite the species has been listed in fishery and trade regulations to hinder its population decline, the lack of knowledge on its distribution patterns and habitats essential for its persistence still hampers the implementation of sound conservation actions. Combining data from local expert knowledge, opportunistic catch records, and Baited Remote Underwater Videos, we show evidence of the interannual presence of young-of-the-year (YOY) I. oxyrinchus in the Pelagie Archipelago (Central Mediterranean Sea). A total of twenty-one individuals ranging 71–92.5 cm FL were incidentally caught (on average 2.3 YOY/1000 hooks) or documented on BRUVS in July and August over three consecutive years. These data coupled with questionnaires administered to longline fishers identify one specific area used by YOY in the summer months. Our study presents the most abundant record of YOY shortfin makos in the Mediterranean Sea within such a restricted time and limited area providing important information for improving the protection of this critically endangered species.
... This species is occasionally present in the Mediterranean Sea, (Bauchot, 1987;Serena, 2005;Zenetos et al., 2012), with records on the south coast from Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Libya (UNEP-MAP RAC/SPA, 2005) to Egypt. Its presence is occasional on the north coast, with a single record in the Ligurian Sea (Boero and Carli, 1977;Celona and De Maddalena, 2005;Psomadakis et al., 2012;Sperone et al., 2012). The map in Figure 2 was modified in the Mediterranean Sea region to represent the distribution of the species detailed in this section. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
A review of the ecology and fishery biology of the great hammerhead shark (Sphyrna mokarran), with a special focus on the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent seas.
... The new events recorded in the last five-year period (2017)(2018)(2019)(2020)(2021)(2022) [7,8,9,10,11] and reported as rare. ...
... The occurrence of several shark species (e.g., Prionace glauca, H. griseus, Cetorhinus maximus, Carcharodon carcharias, Isurus oxyrhincus, Carcharhinus brevipinna, Lamna nasus, Odontaspis ferox, and Sphyrna lewini) has been detected in the sea area close to the Alcione and Casoni seamounts in the South Tyrrhenian Sea [140]. ...
Article
Full-text available
As part of the “Innovations in the Food System: Exploring the Future of Food” Special Issue, this paper briefly reviews studies that highlight a link between deep-sea fishery resources (deep-sea food resources) and vulnerable marine ecosystems (VME), species, and habitats in the Mediterranean Sea, providing new insights into changes in commercial and experimental catches of the deep-sea fishery resources in the central Mediterranean over the last 30 years. About 40% of the total landing of Mediterranean deep-water species is caught in the central basin. Significant changes in the abundance of some of these resources with time, sea-bottom temperature (SBT), and fishing effort (FE) have been detected, as well as an effect of the Santa Maria di Leuca cold-water coral province on the abundance of the deep-sea commercial crustaceans and fishes. The implications of these findings and the presence of several geomorphological features, sensitive habitats, and VMEs in the central Mediterranean are discussed with respect to the objectives of biodiversity conservation combined with those of management of fishery resources.
Preprint
Full-text available
One of the chief consequences of climate change is the worldwide redistribution of species in the pursue of physiologically and ecologically favourable conditions. As part of one of the most threatened groups of vertebrates, assessing how climate change may affect the distribution patterns of key shark species is essential for their long-term conservation and management. The present study aims to assess how climate change projections (based on the representative concentration pathways 2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5) for the middle and end of the century may affect the global patterns of habitat suitability (HS) for large hammerhead sharks – a unique and particularly threatened group of elasmobranchs. Here, a decline in the average HS is projected for both Sphyrna lewini and Sphyrna zygaena , with the scale of HS decline generally increasing with time and RCP severity, while an increase in HS is generally projected for Sphyrna mokarran , albeit reduced over the long-term and overturned under long-term RCP8.5. Meanwhile, poleward shifts are projected for all three species, with considerable tropical declines for both S. lewini and S. zygaena . Additionally, regional shifts in suitability have the potential to affect population connectivity, the access to key habitats, and levels of exposure to other anthropogenic pressures, along with the effectiveness of conservation and management efforts. Taken together, these results showcase the importance of climate change for species’ extinction risk assessment and the urgency of its consideration for the design and implementation of conservation measures tailored to the oceans of tomorrow.
Chapter
Full-text available
Una revisión de la ecología y biología pesquera de la cornuda gigante (Sphyrna mokarran), con especial énfasis en el Océano Atlántico y mares adyacentes.
Article
Full-text available
The state-of-art on alien species in the Mediterranean Sea is presented, making distinctions among the four subregions defined in the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive: (i) the Western Mediterranean Sea (WMED); (ii) the Central Mediterranean Sea (CMED); (iii) the Adriatic Sea (ADRIA); and (iv) the Eastern Mediterranean Sea (EMED). The updated checklist (December 2010) of marine alien species within each subregion, along with their acclimatization status and origin, is provided. A total of 955 alien species is known in the Mediterranean, the vast majority of them having being introduced in the EMED (718), less in the WMED (328) and CMED (267) and least in the Adriatic (171). Of these, 535 species (56%) are established in at least one area. Despite the collective effort of experts who attempted in this work, the number of introduced species remains probably underestimated. Excluding microalgae, for which knowledge is still insufficient, aliens have increased the total species richness of the Mediterranean Sea by 5.9%. This figure should not be directly read as an indication of higher biodiversity, as spreading of so many aliens within the basin is possibly causing biotic homogenization. Thermophilic species, i.e. Indo-Pacific, Indian Ocean, Red Sea, Tropical Atlantic, Tropical Pacific, and circum(sub)tropical, account for 88.4% of the introduced species in the EMED, 72.8% in the CMED, 59.3% in the WMED and 56.1% in the Adriatic. Cold water species, i.e. circumboreal, N Atlantic, and N Pacific, make up a small percentage of the introduced species, ranging between 4.2% and 21.6% and being more numerous in the Adriatic and less so in the EMED. Species that are classified as invasive or potentially invasive are 134 in the whole of the Mediterranean: 108 are present in the EMED, 76 in the CMED, 53 in the Adriatic and 64 in the WMED. The WMED hosts most invasive macrophytes, whereas the EMED has the lion’s share in polychaetes, crustaceans, molluscs and fish.
Article
Full-text available
Capture d'une femelle gravide de requin blanc dans le golfe de Gabès (Tunisie méridionale, Méditerranée centrale) avec des commentaires sur l'oophagie chez les requins. Les auteurs relatent la capture par un thonier d'une femelle gra-vide de requin blanc dans le golfe de Gabès (Tunisie méridionale, Méditerranée centrale), le 26 février 2004. La mère portait quatre embryons en cours de développement, mesurant entre 132 et 135 cm de longueur totale et pesant entre 27,65 et 31,50 kg. Les embryons présentaient un abdomen fortement distendu sous l'eff e t du vitellus qui emplissait leur estomac, ce qui confirme que l'espèce est oophage. Des commentaires sur l'oophagie pendant le dévelop-pement embryonnaire sont présentés en se fondant sur une revue de la littérature et plus spécialement sur des publications concernant le requin blanc, mais aussi d'autres espèces oophages telles que le requin-taupe commun, Lamna nasus, le requin-taupe bleu, I s u ru s o x y r i n c h u s et le renard à gros yeux, Alopias superc i l i o s u s.
Article
Full-text available
During the period 1998-2001, a survey to study the incidence of the drifting longline fishery on shark populations was carried out in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. A total of 8 different pelagic shark species were recorded in the catches of the Greek swordfish and albacore longline fisheries. Among them, the blue shark, Prionace glauca, was the most common species in the catches while the bigeyed sixgill shark, Hexanchus nakamurai, was reported for the first time in the area. Shark by-catches were noteworthy in the swordfish fishery reaching a 3.8% in number and 3.6% in biomass of the total catch. The higher abundance indices were observed in the Levantine Basin (CPUE = 0.74 sharks/1,000 hooks). Catches in this area consisted of much larger specimens than those measured in other areas of the Mediterranean Sea.
Article
Full-text available
The impact of fishing on chondrichthyan stocks around the world is currently the focus of considerable international concern. Most chondrichthyan populations are of low productivity relative to teleost fishes, a consequence of their different life-history strategies. This is reflected in the poor record of sustainability of target shark fisheries. Most sharks and some batoids are predators at, or near, the top of marine food webs. The effects of fishing are examined at the single-species level and through trophic interactions. We summarize the status of chondrichthyan fisheries from around the world. Some 50% of the estimated global catch of chondrichthyans is taken as by-catch, does not appear in official fishery statistics, and is almost totally unmanaged. When taken as by-catch, they are often subjected to high fishing mortality directed at teleost target species. Consequently, some skates, sawfish, and deep-water dogfish have been virtually extirpated From large regions. Some chondrichthyans are more resilient to fishing and we examine predictions on the vulnerability of different species based on their life-history and population parameters. At the species level, fishing may alter size structure and population parameters in response to changes in species abundance. We review the evidence for such density-dependent change. Fishing can affect trophic interactions and we examine cases of apparent species replacement and shifts in community composition. Sharks and rays learn to associate trawlers with food and feeding on discards may increase their populations. Using ECOSIM, we make some predictions about the long-term response of ecosystems to fishing on sharks. Three different environments are analysed: a tropical shelf ecosystem in Venezuela, a Hawaiian coral reef ecosystem, and a North Pacific oceanic ecosystem. (C) 2000 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.
Article
On July 1, 2008, a new-born great white shark was captured by a commercial gill-netter off the coast of Altinoluk (Edremit Bay, north Aegean Sea), followed by the capture of another juvenile three days later at the same locality during a haul of bottom long-line set by the same fisherman. Before the present study, the smallest free-living white shark from the Mediterranean Sea appeared to be a 142 cm TL small female juvenile, captured off Mazara del Vallo in August 11, 1983 (catalog No. MSI-0285J, appendix 1 in Fergusson , 1996). Therefore, specimen No. 1 (125,5 cm TL) of the present study is possibly the smallest neonate white shark from Mediterranean waters to date.
Article
Marine and terrestrial environments differ fundamentally in space-time scales of both physical and ecological processes. These differences will have an impact on the animals inhabiting each domain, particularly with respect to their spatial ecology. The behavioural strategies that underpin observed distributions of marine species are therefore important to consider. Comparatively little is known, however, about how wild fishes actually respond to gradients in food supply and temperature, and to potential mates. This paper describes how behavioural theory is being used to elucidate the strategies and tactics of free-ranging sharks in three specific areas of study, namely, foraging on zooplankton, behavioural energetics and sexual segregation. The studies discussed are novel because shark movements were tracked in the wild using electronic tags in relation to simultaneous measurements of prey densities and thermal resources. The results show that filter-feeding (basking shark, Cetorhinus maximus) and predatory (dogfish, Scyliorhinus canicula) sharks have relatively complex behaviour patterns integrally linked to maximizing surplus power, often through making short and longer term ‘trade-off’ decisions between optimal foraging and thermal habitats. Interestingly, female S. canicula exhibit alternative behavioural strategies compared to males, a difference resulting in spatial segregation by habitat. Sexual segregation in this species occurs primarily as a consequence of male avoidance by females. Studies on free-ranging sharks provide a useful model system for examining how a predator's strategy is shaped by its environment. More theory-based studies of the behavioural processes of sharks are required however, before critical comparisons with other vertebrate predators are possible. Suggestions for further research to address this knowledge gap are given.