... Community, institutional support [60] Conflicting views in CSEd community on priority research areas [18] Creation and dissemination of high-quality, equity-focused resources, tools, best practices, instruments, assessments [9,39,55,59,85] CSEd not recognized as a sub discipline within CS departments [16] Difficulties conducting qualitative research [37] Difficulty in deciding which department students should be apart of (Computing or Education) [16] Diversity in collaborators, leadership, researchers [8,88] Equal opportunities for networking Flawed peer review bidding processes [68] Funding, incentives, recognition, awards [16,19,42,81,84] Gaps in pay, publication, promotion Importance of conferences vs journals [43] Insufficient publication venues [16,17,43,58] Lack of CSEd faculty mentors for PhD students [17] Lack of infrastructure to support CSEd [19,20] Lack of qualitative research/prioritization of quantitative [18,37] Lack of replication studies (undervalued for publication, promotion, prestige over original work) [1,36] Lack of research questions in regards to research practitioners [25] Lack of respect for CSEd [16,17,20] Lack of validated assessment instruments [82] Limited job prospects [16,17] Limited opportunities to collaborate [16,19,20] Local publications devalued in favor of global research [14] Increased workload and lack of compensation for peer reviewers [68] Methods for linking research to practice and practice to research [41] Outreach viewed as a feminine task with less legitimacy [22] Personal costs (time, training, financial burden of higher education, unpaid labor, etc.) Proliferation of methods (longitudinal research [22], replication studies [1,36]) Removal of physical and other inequitable barriers to publish at and participate in conferences Research that does not match needs of practitioners [24] Strict use of theory requirement in research can stymie the search for better curriculum design [65] Time constraints (teaching vs research) [14,17] Tension between empowering less-established academics while anonymous and open reviews [68] Unclear recruiting practices for academic peer review [68] and workshops and within publications, and access to attend and participate in conferences virtually. It also includes the open access of research artifacts (e.g., publications, data, instrumentation, etc.) [6]. ...