In this chapter, we consider the range of volcanic explosive eruption styles, from the smallest and least intense to the largest and most intense that produce pyroclastic fallout deposits. At the small-scale end of the spectrum of subaerial explosive eruptions, we include strombolian sensu stricto, halema’ma’uan and small-scale vulcanian and hydrothermal explosions. At the next level, there are small-scale hawai’ian magma/fire fountaining and larger scale vulcanian and hydrothermal explosions, followed by large-scale hawai’ian magma/fire fountaining, large vulcanian, and violent strombolian eruptions. We consider the eruptions that produce basaltic scoria through to rhyolitic pumice cones to be micro-plinian, at the small end of the spectrum of sub-plinian, plinian, and ultra-plinian explosive styles. We suggest that violent strombolian eruption style, which also produces cones, represents a transition between open-system degassing and closed-system degassing processes, and also that all the magmatic explosive eruption styles can transition into phreatomagmatic equivalents, irrespective of the scale, as demonstrated by the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai eruption. The dynamics of the explosive eruption columns for all these styles are discussed, as are characteristic erupted masses and mass eruption rates. The characteristics of the deposits from each eruption style are described and comprehensively illustrated, particularly the field facies characteristics. Close to the vent, some proximal fallout deposits are welded, or pass into agglutinated spatter. We also review what is known about pyroclastic fallout processes in aqueous environments, and highlight how eruption dynamics, columns, and dispersal processes are different from subaerial processes. Several new proposed subaqueous eruption styles have recently emerged from recent research, including yalian, poseidic, neptunian, tangaroan-havre, and now hunga tongan. Although not enough is presently known about the fragmentation processes, intensity, and dispersal extent of these subaqueous eruption styles, it is important that they be acknowledged as a basis for driving future research. Finally, we consider how fit for purpose existing classification schemes for pyroclastic fallout deposits are. We suggest modifications to these, including recalibration of the logarithmic VEI, Eruption Magnitude and Explosive Intensity scales that have been applied for several decades, to accommodate smaller scale events that could previously not be included, but can be lethal in their impact, and therefore, need to be included in all schemes that reflect eruption scale and intensity.