ResearchPDF Available

A Science of Conceptual Systems (SOCS) Approach to Accelerating the Advancement of the Systems Sciences

December 2015

DOI:10.13140/RG.2.1.2202.7608

Authors:

Foundation for the Advancement of Social Theory

Draft Paper - In this paper, I suggest that we recognize and encourage the development of a “Science of Conceptual Systems” (SOCS). A conceptual system is any set of interrelated concepts that is useful for understanding and engaging our world (e.g. theories, policies, models, mental models). Compared to other world systems (e.g. physical, biological, social), conceptual systems are understudied. Thus, we do not fully understand them. Because of that lack, we find it difficult to create theories and policies that are reliably highly effective in practical application within the social/behavioral sciences. In this paper I will present some background information about conceptual systems – how they have been generated, tested, developed, and applied in practical application and research. I will also describe emerging understandings and their implications for improving our understanding of conceptual systems and developing more effective theories and policies for research and practice.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Project

Job Satisfaction Among Paralegals: A Qualitative Case Study

An investigation into the experiences of paralegals who are satisfied at work.

Project

Policy Analysis

Project

Helping students more easily integrate theoretical models

Steven Wallis

Many students have difficulty understanding what theory "is" AND, the process of integrating theoretical models seems almost impossible to many. As a result, many students simply "read and repeat" the theories in textbooks and so do not find the great opportunity for learning. On a related note, they are not able to apply those theories easily in daily life. Thus, the benefits of our teaching is more limited. In this project, our goal is to develop new and more effective ways to help students understand and integrate theoretical models so that they may be more successful in school and in life! ... [more]

Project

We have met the enemy, and it is not us: A call for depolarization

Steven Wallis

Better understand and reduce the negative effects of "polarization" (which may be seen in many kinds of conflict) by rethinking many of our problems around the world. For example, we think we can " fight terrorism" by "fighting terrorists" when the two might be seen as two very different entities. And, fighting terrorists, might actually increase terrorism! ... [more]

Article

Full-text available

Model-Based Assurance for Justifying Automotive Functional Safety

April 2010

With the growing complexity of, and reliance on, safety-related electrical/electronic (E/E) systems in the automotive sector, the development of an explicit safety case is highly recommended to provide assurance to the different stakeholders interested in automotive functional safety. The production of a safety case is explicitly mandated by the draft automotive functional safety standard ... [Show full abstract] ISO26262. A safety case should consider all organisational and technical factors that may contribute to safety. For example, it should provide assurance for the safe behaviours of a particular system as well as assurance for the process by which this system is developed, operated and maintained. In this paper, we address one component of the overall safety case, namely the assurance of the functional safety concept. In particular, we examine how model-driven development and assessment can provide a basis for the systematic generation of functional safety requirements. We demonstrate how an automotive safety case can be structurally and traceably developed, justifying why and how the defined functional safety requirements can adequately mitigate the risk of the identified hazards to an acceptable level. A case study is also presented throughout this paper, discussing examples and lessons learnt from the development of a safety case for an air suspension system.

Article

Combining usability evaluations to highlight the chain that leads from usability flaws to usage prob...

January 2018 · Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Poor usability of health technology is thought to diminish work system performance, increase error rates and, potentially, harm patients. The present study (i) used a combination of usability evaluation methods to highlight the chain that leads from usability flaws to usage problems experienced by users and, ultimately, to negative patient outcomes, and (ii) validated this approach by studying ... [Show full abstract] two different discharge summary production systems. To comply with quality guidelines, the process of drafting and sending discharge summaries is increasingly being automated. However, the usability of these systems may modify their impact (or the absence thereof) in terms of production times and quality, and must therefore be evaluated. Here, we applied three successive techniques for usability evaluation (heuristic evaluation, user testing and field observation) to two discharge summary production systems (underpinned by different technologies). The systems' main usability flaws led respectively to an increase in the time need to produce a discharge summary and the risk of patient misidentification. Our results are discussed with regard to the possibility of linking the usability flaws, usage problems and the negative outcomes by successively applying three methods for evaluating usability (heuristic evaluation, user testing and in situ observations) throughout the system development life cycle.

Article

Full-text available

Multiparty Negotiation Support: The Role of Visualizations Influence on the Development of Shared M...

June 2002 · Journal of Management Information Systems

The study examines a method for supporting multiparty negotiations by means of a Negotiation Support System (NSS). More specifically, this study investigated the effect of visualization support on the development of shared mental models among negotiators who resolved a spatial planning dispute. The objective of this study is to determine how to support the development of shared mental models in ... [Show full abstract] order to stimulate more productive negotiations. A further goal is to provide guidelines for the design of NSS. Compared with a control condition, visualization improved three aspects of negotiations: visualization support aided negotiators' convergence of perceptions of reality and had positive socio-emotional consequences in terms of increasing cohesiveness and entitativity. As a result, groups with visualization support reached consensus more easily and were more satisfied with the process. In sum, the current study provides support for the idea that presenting negotiators with unambiguous information helps negotiators develop shared mental models.

Chapter

Humanistic Rational Choice and Compliance in Motivation in Complex Societal Dilemmas

July 2018

Daniel A DeCaro

This chapter introduces Humanistic Rational Choice Theory (HRCT), an interdisciplinary behavioral theory of cooperation and compliance, to explain several fundamental questions about compliance illustrated by the case studies in this book. For example, why do self-interested stakeholders voluntarily comply, self-regulate, and cooperate to solve shared compliance problems? Why do regulatory ... [Show full abstract] systems backfire? According to HRCT, individuals comply when governance systems satisfy their fundamental needs, creating a sense of legitimacy and acceptance. However, as demonstrated by the case studies, legitimacy perceptions are subjective, being influenced by individual beliefs (mental models), group relations (e.g., prejudice), and broader social, cultural, and ecological context. HRCT provides a model of the individual decision maker that accounts for this subjectivity in compliance situations spanning multiple scales and domains.