ArticlePDF Available

The future of the global economy: Towards a long boom?

Authors:
  • Ecole des Ponts Business School; University of New Brunswick; University of Stavanger

Abstract

The world stands on the threshold of a tantalising opportunity-the possibility of a sustained long boom over the first decades of the next millennium. It is an opportunity we should not miss. The key factors needed to spark a long boom do indeed appear to be present today. However, its prospects depend first, on the condition of the underlying systemic 'motors', such as the competitive markets, social openness and political democracy that create the foundations for long-run economic dynamism, and second, on the extent to which the balance between historically specific catalysts and constraints-of the knowledge society, global markets and environmental sustainability - can provide the necessary fuel. Provoking a long boom will be contingent on inducing as many of the available catalytic forces as possible and making them work together. In concrete terms that means coherent and integrated policies to accelerate the emergence of the knowledge economy, globalisation and a new environmental sustainability. It also means making the best of the possibilities open to humanity on the eve of the 21(st) century.
The future of the global economy: towards a long boom?
Riel Miller
International Futures Programme
The world stands on the threshold of a tantalising opportunity – the possibility of a sustained long boom over the first decades of the next millennium. It
is an opportunity we should not miss.
Long booms are exceptional events. There have been relatively few in the history of human economic development. Two rapid growth periods of the
last 130 years - one in the latter decades of the 19th century and the other in the period after the Second World War - made major contributions to
lifting the long-run historical average to a higher level.
The anatomy of previous long booms reveals two basic characteristics. The first is that a boom's above-average pace of development tends to be part
the historical trend.
The second feature of a long boom is the coincidence of diverse forces which work together in a specific historical conjuncture. Most recently, this
occurred during the 1950s when the post-war reconstruction boom coalesced around the diffusion and development of innovative technologies,
advanced methods of mass-production as well as new economic and institutional frameworks. Such a constellation of forces helps to spark and
sustain the unusually fast rates of socio-economic change and productivity growth that characterise a long boom.
Harmony and dissonance
Not necessarily. Certainly, strong growth in investment, in the capabilities of the labour force and in trade are crucial for very long periods of sustained
economic development. But the dynamic element that drives change forward is the systemic chemistry that either catalyses the process or stifles it.
History has cast the role of system functionality or dysfunctionality into stark relief. The dire consequences of systems failure are evident, for instance,
in the demise of Soviet command planning or the post-1970s "debt crisis" which plunged many countries into even deeper poverty. On the other hand,
system functionality normally brings immense benefits. This can be seen in the convergence of income levels between North America, Europe and
Japan, and the impressive economic take-off of many Asian countries over the last two to three decades.
What are the ingredients of a functional system that allows it to militate against stagnation and maintain its capacity to change over time? The
answers can be grouped into three areas. First, there are the aspirations and imperatives that emerge when democracy and a competitive market
place are allowed to develop together. Second, there is the capacity to innovate and adapt that can flourish only when there is pluralism, transparency
and openness. And third, there is a whole range of cultural values, such as a respect for both civil liberties and social obligations, which underpin the
constant search for ways of balancing co-operation with competition, security with risk taking.
Of course, systems that are hierarchical, closed and intolerant are capable of short bursts of development, even over several years. This is particularly
so if the technological, organisational and social structures are imposed from above, for example, during wartime, or during a period of forced
industrialisation. But, as the record this century shows, these are not dynamic systems capable of sustaining long-run economic development.
The fact that some systems fail does not mean that all systems must be the same or that functionality can be assured by clinging to what worked in
the past. The ways of sustaining long-run economic dynamism change over time. The 19th century's rather narrowly defined democracies and trading
institutions offered tremendous scope in that era. The same can be said of the organisations of mass production, mass consumption and mass
government that have dominated the 20th century. However, these institutional and organisational forms are hardly adequate to the conditions and
tasks of the 21st century, when meeting a growing diversity of demand will mean encouraging an ever greater diversity of supply. That, in turn,
depends on more initiative, customisation and a further relaxing of centralised controls.
Sustaining the prevailing tide of long-run economic dynamism is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for sparking a long boom. A confluence of
specific technological, economic and social factors will have to fall into place to push the global rate of per capita income growth into the 3% and
above range of a long boom. To reach this target over the next few decades, sufficient progress will have to be made in three critical areas: the
knowledge society; integration of global markets; and environmental sustainability.
Regarding the first set of forces, the transition to a knowledge economy and society, there is a close parallel to the powerful growth-inducing impact of
this century's development of mass production, mass consumption and mass government. In the 21st century, a shift to an economy dominated by the
production and consumption of intangibles, such as the trade in know-how and ideas, could spur the above-average growth rates of a long boom.
The more difficult question is whether or not this catalyst will be sufficiently strong both to drive change forward in as rapid and diffuse a manner as
possible and to overcome any constraints on the way. Just the prospect of laboratory breakthroughs and product innovations offers no assurance of
wide diffusion of new technologies nor the equally important reorganisation of the ways in which people work and live.
Momentum for change does appear to be building in several areas. With the explosive growth of the Internet and electronic commerce, attention is
safeguards, payment systems and intellectual property laws is now being designed. Should this infrastructure fall into place, there is a good chance
that decentralised market competition and knowledge diffusion will accelerate the transition process.
However, improving the ease with which people and firms everywhere can enter markets -- both on the demand and supply sides -- is only part of the
solution. Constraints, such as limited access to easy-to-use, "appropriate" technology and out-dated methods for improving, assessing and attributing
value to human capital threaten to slow change or render it too shallow. The intangible economy's radically new organisational patterns of production,
consumption and human settlement will take hold only if people are helped to overcome their fear of both unfamiliar technology and the prospect of
OECD Observer: The future of the global economy: towards a lon... http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/printpage.php/aid/50/The_futu...
1 of 2 30/11/15 15:54
new, possibly disruptive economic and social changes.
The second set of developments that could power a long boom spring from the possibility of an accelerated and much fuller integration of global
markets. There is good reason to believe such integration would bring positive results. After all, the creation of national or regional spaces for the free
flow of goods, services, finance and technology have had telling effects on long-term growth. Extended world-wide, such integration offers huge scope
to improve both the efficient allocation of resources and the competition of ideas that are the key ingredient of knowledge societies. But numerous
constraints block the way, from having to use existing frameworks for resolving trade disputes, to having to reform or invent institutions that can
manage the volatility of global financial markets.
In addition, the rapid and much fuller integration of global markets required for a long boom is unlikely to be politically feasible without mechanisms for
compensating losers and introducing minimum standards regarding both human and workplace rights. Here the notion of social values plays a
decisive role. Negotiations to merge markets and establish much higher degrees of transparency swiftly confront issues like the value attached by
many to preserving national sovereignty or the willingness to tolerate other people's social norms.
The drive towards environmental sustainability is the third factor that could contribute to sparking a long boom over the first few decades of the next
century. The job of lightening tomorrow's ecological footprint of wealth creation compared to today's industrial societies could, if the policies are
designed appropriately, spur the rapid development of both the intangible, environmentally benign, side of the economy, and improve the
eco-efficiency of the more traditional forms of production and consumption.
Such policies could help to accelerate the diffusion of new technologies, like hydrogen fuel-cells that can generate electricity for both home use and
transportation needs. Perhaps even more importantly, they could help to paint tomorrow's long boom green by making good use of the opportunity
afforded by new technologies to reorganise economic and social life.
On the other hand, moving aggresively towards an environmentally more sustainable economy and society might turn out to be more of a constraint
than a catalyst. Using economic incentives to change consumption and investment behaviour may be highly effective, as experience during the oil
shocks demonstrated, but the adjustment costs are often prohibitively high. These costs could end up compounding the drag exerted by trying to use
global institutions that are still somewhat immature for the daunting tasks of the future. Those tasks could include negotiating the attribution of rights
and the redistribution of income as part of a new form of global ecological citizenship.
Provoking a long boom
The key factors needed to spark a long boom do indeed appear to be present today. However, its prospects depend first, on the condition of the
underlying systemic "motors", such as the competitive markets, social openness and political democracy that create the foundations for long-run
economic dynamism, and second, on the extent to which the balance between historically specific catalysts and constraints -- of the knowledge
society, global markets and environmental sustainability -- can provide the necessary fuel. Provoking a long boom will be contingent on inducing as
many of the available catalytic forces as possible and making them work together. In concrete terms that means coherent and integrated policies to
accelerate the emergence of the knowledge economy, globalisation and a new environmental sustainability. It also means making the best of the
possibilities open to humanity on the eve of the 21st century.
Unfortunately, opportunities are not always grasped. There is now a rare chance to realise a period of rapid, widely shared growth and to reverse the
trends towards deepening inequality and exclusion that have marked recent decades. These are two very good reasons for making the exceptional
economic and social policy efforts required for the long boom to become reality.
Bibliography
Schwartz, Peter and Leyden, Peter, "The Long Boom: A History of the Future, 1980 - 2020",
Wired Magazine
, July 1997.
21st Century Technologies: Promises and Perils of a Dynamic Future
, OECD, 1998.
The Future of the Global Economy: Towards a Long Boom?
, OECD, 1999.
©OECD Observer No 217/218, Summer 1999
OECD Observer: The future of the global economy: towards a lon... http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/printpage.php/aid/50/The_futu...
2 of 2 30/11/15 15:54
... Projections of the period through 2025 borne out by data, show unprecedented numbers will reach retirement age, these baby boomers make up almost half (47%) of the workforce today (Miller, 1999). Several factors suggest that the projected demographic profile of the U.S. will become more highly diverse and that the shifting growth in postsecondary entry rates will remain steady due to the stable birthrate of the next several cohorts of 17-year-olds (Vincent-Lancrin, 2008). ...
... A comparison of the progress of developing nations with more economically developed countries indicates that those competing effectively for economic resources are more often open to the "diffusion of technology and knowledge, market integration and environmental transformation" (Miller, 1999). The countries of India, Brazil, Mexico, and China have been nourishing longrunning economic vitality and have developed economically while making significant improvements in social, educational and health status. ...
... The expanded global marketplace has resulted in facilitating more efficient communication technologies, transportation systems, and market rules, which in turn have fueled gains in trade and international economic specialization. As Miller's (1999) millennial study points out in concrete terms, the results of embracing the expanded globalization are integrated and coherent policies that will continue to accelerate the emergence of new environmental sustainability, industrial globalization, and a new knowledge economy. ...
Book
Full-text available
Current graduation rates indicate a lack of persistence at public two-year community and technical colleges. This study identifies promising practices found to be effective in the way they help improve graduation rates at public two-year colleges in the United States. The research outcomes recommend effective strategies of practice targeting increased student persistence. A National longitudinal dataset, the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), was queried for graduation rates that increased significantly between 2009 and 2014. The colleges demonstrating significant increases in graduation rates were surveyed, and interviews were conducted with those self-selecting to participate by providing a context to the student success experience on their campuses. Graduation rates of all 910 public two-year colleges consistently demonstrated a negatively skewed 21 percent mean graduation rate in 150 percent of completion time associated with first-time, full-time students. The research determined that coaching and advising, in addition to supplemental instruction and tutoring intervention, had the largest impact of the programs, processes, and practices identified by colleges surveyed and having significant graduation rate increases between 2009 and 2014. There were enduring themes that emerged from the iterative process of thematic analysis employed in the qualitative aspect of this mixed methods study
... Water is undeniably a fundamental resource for humanity, playing an irreplaceable role in our well-being and development throughout history (Sullivan et al. 2003). It has been a driving force behind the rise of civilizations, the growth of economies, and the improvement of living standards (Miller 1999). Yet, in recent years, we have faced unprecedented challenges related to water scarcity, driven by a confluence of factors that demand our immediate attention (Lee et al. 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Water poverty’ is a hidden crisis in selected Palika's of Nepal, arising from factors such as population growth, climate change, land use alterations, and erratic infrastructure development, significantly impacting water resource quantity and quality. Addressing this requires location-specific indicators like the Water Poverty Index (WPI) for effective water resource planning. This study investigates water poverty causes in the area, analyzing five WPI components: Access, Resource, Usage, Capacity, and Environment. Introducing 10 WPI indicators and 13 context-specific variables tailored to Nepal, the research assesses water poverty across different spatial scales (metropolitan, sub-metropolitan, municipality, and rural municipality). The results show WPI scores ranging from 62.96 to 72.77, highlighting the need for targeted policy interventions. While no clear trend emerges across scales, higher resource and access scores prevail in all areas, with use, environment, and capacity scores higher in metropolitan and sub-metropolitan regions. These disparities underscore the need for tailored policies and management plans across scales to improve water poverty in the studied regions.
... The scope of economic policy to help shape the economic impact of ICT, and national economic policy autonomy in particular have been restricted by a variety of causes . From a long-term perspective, the most important economic policies may be those which aim at fostering creativity and facilitating change in order to enhance the economic agents' abilities to unfold the economic potential of theses technologies (Michalski et al. 1999, McQuaid 2002. These policies target: first, the redesign of the regulatory framework which has been set up in the era of mass-production and which has partly become either obsolete or even an obstacle to reaping the economic benefits of the spread new technologies; second, the re-arranging of traditional work and incentive schemes; and third, the design of a framework which is conducive to experimental initiatives that create new spaces where entrepreneurship can succeed. ...
Article
Full-text available
The political context of governments differs between the UK, Germany and Austria, but each government currently has a positive view of Public private Partnership (PPP). There are many similarities to the drivers for PPPs in Austria, Germany and the UK. The UK has had more experience, and the conservative-led government in Austria has been moving towards greater use of PPPs of the “privatisation”-type, but only very cautiously towards PPPs of the “PFI-type”. The major motives for moving towards PPPs are macroeconomic or budgetary, especially in Germany and Austria, but also microeconomic or improving the efficiency of public service delivery, especially in the UK. In all three countries PPPs appear to be a systematic middle response to the alternatives of privatisation or public service provision of infrastructure and operational support. There are more significant multi-tiered levels of government in the Federal systems of Germany and Austria, with many autonomous players including federal government, states and municipalities. Investment by the latter two exceeds investment expenditure of the federal government. In the more centralised UK system policies towards PPPs have been relatively rapid and similar, although not identical, across the UK. In Germany the search for a comprehensive approach (Gesamtkonzept) has slowed the dissemination of PPP; Austria seems to handle the issue more pragmatically. One issue that remains crucial to the future impacts of PPPs is whether they offer genuine and sustainable increases in efficiency and effectiveness compared to the alternatives. If they do then they should have a positive impact on future public resource availability, but if they do not then they may provide short-term financial and political benefits, but at the cost of constraining future decision makers and placing greater pressures on public finances in the longer-term.
... Economic policy thus has been confronted with a need to re-consider its role in order to pave the way for grasping the full benefit of a potential long-term economic upswing (a " Kondratieff " -wave) based on the diffusion of ICT throughout the economy (Scherrer 2001). From a long-term perspective, the most important economic policies may be those which aim at fostering creativity and facilitating change in order to enhance the economic agents' abilities to unfold the economic potential of ICT (Michalski et al. 1999, McQuaid 2002). These policies target: first, the redesign of the regulatory framework which has been set up in the pre-ICT era of mass-production and which has partly become either obsolete or even an obstacle to reaping the economic benefits of the spread of ICT; second, the re-arranging of traditional work and incentive schemes; and third, the design of a framework which is conducive to experimental initiatives that create new spaces where entrepreneurship can succeed. ...
... The scope of economic policy to help shape the economic impact of ICT, and national economic policy autonomy in particular have been restricted by a variety of causes . From a long-term perspective, the most important economic policies may be those which aim at fostering creativity and facilitating change in order to enhance the economic agents' abilities to unfold the economic potential of theses technologies (Michalski et al. 1999, McQuaid 2002. These policies target: first, the redesign of the regulatory framework which has been set up in the era of mass-production and which has partly become either obsolete or even an obstacle to reaping the economic benefits of the spread new technologies; second, the re-arranging of traditional work and incentive schemes; and third, the design of a framework which is conducive to experimental initiatives that create new spaces where entrepreneurship can succeed. ...
... The scope of economic policy to help shape the economic impact of ICT, and national economic policy autonomy in particular have been restricted by a variety of causes . From a long-term perspective, the most important economic policies may be those which aim at fostering creativity and facilitating change in order to enhance the economic agents' abilities to unfold the economic potential of theses technologies (Michalski et al. 1999, McQuaid 2002. These policies target: first, the redesign of the regulatory framework which has been set up in the era of mass-production and which has partly become either obsolete or even an obstacle to reaping the economic benefits of the spread new technologies; second, the re-arranging of traditional work and incentive schemes; and third, the design of a framework which is conducive to experimental initiatives that create new spaces where entrepreneurship can succeed. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Public Private Partnership in the European Union – The Cases of the UK, Germany, and Austria Across the European Union the use of different forms of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) have been growing, but in different ways and for different reasons across Member States. This paper considers experiences and motivations in three contrasting Member States, the UK, Germany and Austria, where the political contexts differ, but each government currently has a positive view of PPPs. The implementation of the new international accounting proposed by International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), and accepted by the European Commission, will have a profound importance on the future use of PPPs. If public sector financial costs are forced to move ‘on balance sheet’ and the future liabilities be counted as a component of national debt, then this is likely to have a profound impact on the participation in PPPs by Member States as it will help remove the current ‘fiscal illusion’ motivating their development. This would change the basis of the choice of using PPPs a more ‘level playing field’ with other financing sources and also give a realistic measure of future public commitments and debt. Hence PPPs would be judged, compared to other financing and implementation mechanisms, on their efficiency and effectiveness basis, rather than on the basis primarily of budget enlargement through a form of ‘fiscal illusion’ as appears to happen currently. The overall conclusion is that if new standards for accounting for PPPs are fully implemented then there may be a reduction in PPPs and a refocusing up their potential efficiency gains.
... Economic policy thus has been confronted with a need to re-consider its role in order to pave the way for grasping the full benefit of a potential long-term economic upswing (a " Kondratieff " -wave) based on the diffusion of ICT throughout the economy (Scherrer 2001). From a long-term perspective, the most important economic policies may be those which aim at fostering creativity and facilitating change in order to enhance the economic agents' abilities to unfold the economic potential of ICT (Michalski et al. 1999, McQuaid 2002). These policies target: first, the redesign of the regulatory framework which has been set up in the pre-ICT era of mass-production and which has partly become either obsolete or even an obstacle to reaping the economic benefits of the spread of ICT; second, the re-arranging of traditional work and incentive schemes; and third, the design of a framework which is conducive to experimental initiatives that create new spaces where entrepreneurship can succeed. ...
Article
Full-text available
1 CHALLENGES FOR ECONOMIC POLICY In spite of the recent economic slowdown the spread of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and its importance for growth is set to continue. The diffusion of ICT may both increase and decrease the complexity of the production process, and economic globalisation is an inherent ingredient of the spread of ICT. The diffusion process does not occur evenly across regions, and the potential gains are not evenly distributed across regions. For firms it has become easier to avoid high taxes and strict regulations in individual countries due to its improved mobility and flexibility. This has increased the intensifying of international competition between the business investments of regions and nations. Economic policy thus has been confronted with a need to re-consider its role in order to pave the way for grasping the full benefit of a potential long-term economic upswing (a "Kondratieff"-wave) based on the diffusion of ICT throughout the economy (Scherrer 2001). From a long-term perspective, the most important economic policies may be those which aim at fostering creativity and facilitating change in order to enhance the economic agents' abilities to unfold the economic potential of ICT (Michalski et al. 1999, McQuaid 2002). These policies target: first, the redesign of the regulatory framework which has been set up in the pre-ICT era of mass-production and which has partly become either obsolete or even an obstacle to reaping the economic benefits of the spread of ICT; second, the re-arranging of traditional work and incentive schemes; and third, the design of a framework which is conducive to experimental initiatives that create new spaces where entrepreneurship can succeed. Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) are relevant with respect to all three aspects. While the successful implementation of PPPs requires some re-regulation and has a somewhat experimental character, the redesign of the traditional incentive structure in a market economy is at the core of the concept.
Article
Full-text available
China wird bis 2025 zu einer weltwirtschaftlichen "soft power" reifen. Seine Bevölkerung wird maßvoll, aber wieder kräftiger expandieren, so dass die künftige Verknappung von Arbeits- kräften und Alterung der Bevölkerung verlangsamt wird. Sein rasch zunehmender Energiebedarf wird weiter vornehmlich durch Kohle, mit einem großen Defizit der Erdöl-Bilanz, abgedeckt werden. China wird in Schlüsseltechnologien des 21. Jhs. (IT, Biotechnologie) in die Spitzenriege vorstoßen, mit Rückwirkungen auf andere Industrien wie den Automobilbau. Diese Entwicklung ist krisensicher, da die fiskalischen Potenziale zur Lösung insbesondere einer Bankenkrise vorhanden sind. China wird in diesem Zeitraum eine eigentümliche Governance Struktur ent- wickeln, die zwar weitestgehend auf Privateigentum aufbaut, gleichzeitig aber wirtschaftliche Eliten über die Nomenklatura der Kommunistischen Partei kontrolliert. JEL No O 10, P 27 1. Die Grenzen von Prognosen Der Zusammenbruch der sozialistischen Planwirtschaften Ende der achtziger Jahre war in dieser Form von niemandem vorhergesehen worden. Ein ähnliches Versagen der volkswirtschaftlichen Prognose lässt sich für die Asienkrise notieren. Auch im Falle derart komplexer und hochdynami- scher Phänomene wie dem chinesischen Hyperwachstum können sich Prognosen nur auf Verallge- meinerungen mittlerer Reichweite stützen, also zum Beispiel Regelmäßigkeiten des wirtschaft- lichen Strukturwandels, die angesichts künftig veränderter technologischer Rahmenbedingungen ihre Geltung verlieren mögen. Kaum vorhersehbar und in ihren Folgen antizipierbar sind singuläre Ereignisse, die Wegscheiden der Entwicklung sein können: Die SARS Krise hat zur Überraschung vieler Beobachter keine sichtbaren Auswirkungen auf das Wirtschaftswachstum von 2003 gehabt - stattdessen hat China seiner Bevölkerung bewiesen, dass sein Wachstum robust ist, und es wurde ein politisch administrativer Lernprozess in Richtung weiterer Schaffung von Transparenz und Professionalisierung angestoßen (Amos, 2004, 17). Ich gliedere meine Analyse nach materiellen und institutionellen Determinanten und konzentriere mich auf qualitative Aussagen. Materielle Faktoren sind Potenzial und Beschränkung von Wachstum gleichermaßen. Institutionen spielen die entscheidende Rolle für das Ausmaß, in dem Potenziale realisiert werden können. Formale Institutionen sind in hohem Umfang durch politische Ent- wicklungen bestimmt; informale Institutionen sind unter anderem kulturell bedingt. Wirtschaftliche Prognosen können also nicht unabhängig von Betrachtungen über politischen, gesellschaftlichen und kulturellen Wandel angestellt werden. In diesem Zusammenhang nehme ich die spezielle Perspektive ein, Chinas "Grand Strategy" zu fokussieren (Swaine/Tellis, 2000; Newton/Subbaranam, 2002). Im politischen System Chinas spielt seit den Opium-Kriegen des 19. Jahrhunderts die Herausforderung eine überragende Rolle, Chinas Platz in der Welt neu zu bestimmen und dem Land und seiner Kultur wieder eine Position zu geben, die dem Erbe dieser ältesten kontinuierlich bestehenden Zivilisation der Menschheitsgeschichte gerecht wird. Die Wirtschaftsreformen nach 1978 waren und sind ein Bestandteil dieser "Grand Strategy". Sie aus dem Auge zu verlieren, bedeutet deshalb, China misszuverstehen. Dies gilt vor
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide assessment of the current status of economic development and policy suggestions as to how Slovenia can catch up with developed countries and close the development gap. Design/methodology/approach The paper first analyses world development scenarios. Part two is devoted to the calculation of development gaps by novel time distance methodology in order to identify major reasons for lagging behind and concludes by providing policy ideas how to close these gaps. Findings The time lag for GDP per capita with the EU 15 average is 18 years, and larger when Slovenia is compared to the successful small EU member states. The optimistic scenario of catching up in 16 years would require 2 per cent higher growth rate than EU 15 average. This time would be shorter if the government policy would promote the knowledge‐based economy, internationalisation, innovative capabilities and become more effective, responsive, flexibile and closing persistent implementation and co‐ordination gaps. Practical implications The application of a different way of measuring development gaps by time distance methodology is applicable also for other small transition economies. The paper also provides a source of policy ideas for a development strategy of Slovenia and small transition countries in general. Originality/value The paper makes original calculations of development gaps by time distance methodology for, e.g. GDP per capita, productivity, export per capita, export of technologically intensive products as well as policy suggestions how to close development gap.
Article
Full-text available
Endogenous development is a notion that explains the mechanics of capital accumulation under the conditions of increasing competition, such as those that characterize the globalization process. The paper argues that the productivity determinants are the difussion of innovation, the flexible organization of production, the agglomeration economies and institutional thickness. The Hanoi effect would propel the necessary sinergy between these processes and determine the rise of increasing returns. Endogenous development is an approach for action and local development policiy tools focus on these processes and help the cities and regions answer the challenges of globalization.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.