A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Urolithiasis
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
1 3
Urolithiasis (2016) 44:91–100
DOI 10.1007/s00240-015-0840-y
INVITED REVIEW
Metabolic risk‑evaluation and prevention of recurrence in stone
disease: does it make sense?
Hans‑Göran Tiselius1
Received: 8 June 2015 / Accepted: 5 November 2015 / Published online: 27 November 2015
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Introduction
For the medical and metabolic care of patients with uro-
lithiasis, there are two essential questions that immediately
seek an answer. Is prevention of recurrence at all possi-
ble and of value and if so, does prevention of recurrence
require metabolic risk-evaluation?
Before addressing this issue in detail, it is necessary to
know that the risk of recurrent stone formation varies con-
siderably between patients. It has accordingly been shown
that without preventive treatment the recurrence risk for
patients with cystinuria is around 85 % [1]. For infection
and uric acid stone forming patients, despite lack of spe-
cific information, it can be assumed that the recurrence risk
also is very high and probably at similar or even higher
levels.
A more variable response to preventive treatment has
been recorded and can be expected in patients who have
formed stones composed of calcium salts; calcium oxa-
late and calcium phosphate. In these patients the average
recurrence risk after 10 years is around 50 % [2, 3] (Fig. 1).
Patients forming brushite stones (calcium hydrogen phos-
phate) have a particularly high recurrence risk as high as
70 % [3, 4]. But for the other calcium stone patients it
stands to reason that while some will only form one stone
during their life-time others are afflicted by a more severe
disease with repeated stone formation and repeated need of
active stone removing interventions. When patients, who
had formed their first and only stone (S), were compared
with those who had formed at least two stones (R) at the
start of follow-up, two different courses were recorded
(Fig. 1). For S-patients less than 30 % have formed one
or several new stones after 10 years. This should be com-
pared with a 10-year recurrence risk of almost 70 % for
R-patients. It thus seems reasonable to assume that whereas
Abstract In this review, aspects on the importance of
information on urine composition and selection of the
most appropriate regimen for prevention of recurrence are
discussed. For patients with urolithiasis the treatment is
facilitated by urine analysis with estimates of supersatura-
tion levels. Despite lack of strong scientific evidence for
the benefit of selective versus non-selective prevention of
recurrence in patients with calcium stone disease, there is
currently both convincing and logical information in sup-
port of tailored/selective treatment regimens aiming at
correction of abnormal target variables. Such an approach
is also recommended in the EAU and AUA guidelines. It
is important, however, that every preventive regimen is
balanced between the effects on urine composition and
patients’ tolerance to the treatment in order to achieve sat-
isfactory compliance. It is possible that future improved
understanding of the causes of calcium stone formation
might provide a different therapeutic approach.
Keywords Calcium stones · Non-calcium stones · Stone
analysis · Serum analysis · Urine analysis · Risk factors ·
Supersaturation · Prevention of recurrence · Dietary
advice · Drinking advice · Pharmacological treatment ·
Selective treatment · Non-selective treatment
* Hans-Göran Tiselius
hans-goran.tiselius@telia.com; hans-goran.tiselius@ki.se
1 Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Science,
Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska
Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.