ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

It is estimated that people in the developed world spend more than 85-90% of their time indoors. Of this, most is spent in homes. To minimize health risks from pollutants occurring in homes, exposures should be controlled. The most effective way to achieve this is to control sources of pollutants and to reduce emissions. Often, especially in existing buildings, this strategy is difficult to implement, in which case exposures are controlled by providing sufficient, presumably clean, outdoor ventilation air to dilute and remove the contaminants. The present paper attempts to find out how much ventilation is needed in existing homes to reduce health risks. This is achieved by reviewing the published scientific literature investigating the association between measured ventilation rates and the measured and observed health problems. The paper concludes that, generally, there are very few studies on this issue and many of them suffer from deficient experimental design, as well as a lack of proper characterization of actual exposures occurring indoors. Based on the available data, in the reviewed studies, it seems likely that health risks may occur when ventilation rates are below 0.4 air changes per hour in existing homes. No data were found indicating that buildings having dedicated natural ventilation systems perform less well than the dwellings in which mechanical ventilation systems are installed. Newly installed mechanical ventilation systems were observed to improve health conditions. In homes with existing ventilation systems this positive effect was less evident, probably due to poor performance of the system (too low ventilation rates and/or poor maintenance). Studies are recommended in which exposures are much better characterized (by for example measuring the pollutants indicated by the WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality and improving ventilation measurements). Exposures should also be controlled using different ventilation methods for comparison. Future studies should also advance the understanding of how ventilation systems should be operated to achieve optimal performance. These data would create further input and support to the guidelines for ventilation based on health developed currently in the framework of the HealthVent project (
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
The Effects of Ventilation in Homes on Health
P. Wargocki
International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, DTU Civil Engineering,
Technical University of Denmark
It is estimated that people in the developed world spend more than 85-90% of their time indoors. Of this,
most is spent in homes. To minimize health risks from pollutants occurring in homes, exposures should be
controlled. The most effective way to achieve this is to control sources of pollutants and to reduce emissions.
Often, especially in existing buildings, this strategy is difficult to implement, in which case exposures are
controlled by providing sufficient, presumably clean, outdoor ventilation air to dilute and remove the
The present paper attempts to find out how much ventilation is needed in existing homes to reduce health
risks. This is achieved by reviewing the published scientific literature investigating the association between
measured ventilation rates and the measured and observed health problems.
The paper concludes that, generally, there are very few studies on this issue and many of them suffer from
deficient experimental design, as well as a lack of proper characterization of actual exposures occurring
indoors. Based on the available data, in the reviewed studies, it seems likely that health risks may occur
when ventilation rates are below 0.4 air changes per hour in existing homes. No data were found indicating
that buildings having dedicated natural ventilation systems perform less well than the dwellings in which
mechanical ventilation systems are installed. Newly installed mechanical ventilation systems were observed
to improve health conditions. In homes with existing ventilation systems this positive effect was less evident,
probably due to poor performance of the system (too low ventilation rates and/or poor maintenance).
Studies are recommended in which exposures are much better characterized (by for example measuring the
pollutants indicated by the WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality and improving ventilation
measurements). Exposures should also be controlled using different ventilation methods for comparison.
Future studies should also advance the understanding of how ventilation systems should be operated to
achieve optimal performance. These data would create further input and support to the guidelines for
ventilation based on health developed currently in the framework of the HealthVent project
Key words: ventilation, ventilation rate, ventilation system, housing, homes, health, pollutants.
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
How much ventilation is needed indoors and which
requirements should be used to design ventilation?
These two questions have been high on the research
agenda for years. They can be readdressed again
especially when strict requirements for energy use in
buildings are implemented and when there is a need
to make buildings tight and energy efficient (EPBD,
2010) so that the quality of life is not compromised
(e.g., Fisk et al., 2011; Wargocki, 2011).
Undoubtedly human responses should be used to
define ventilation requirements. However, it is
relevant to ask whether comfort requirement should
be used, as has been the case for years in many
ventilation standards and guidelines (EN15251,
2007; ASHRAE, 2010; ECA, 1992), or if ventilation
requirements should be based on health outcomes. It
may be argued that both are the same thing if the
World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of
health is considered (1948). Still the link between
comfort and health is not clearly established and it is
not certain whether ensuring comfort requirements
will abate health risks and vice versa.
P Wargocki
Ventilation modifies exposures occurring indoors.
It cannot reduce the emissions. It is used to dilute
and remove the pollutants occurring indoors. For
some pollutants the effectiveness of ventilation can
be quite high, and for some pollutants it can be
rather low. Ventilation can also bring the outdoor
pollutants that are otherwise not present indoors.
Consequently, ventilation requirements should be
defined based on the exposures occurring indoors.
The ventilation requirement can be estimated based
on the emission rates of pollutants, so that the
pollutants occurring indoors are at levels without
concern for human health and comfort. The
problem is that there are very limited data on the
relationship between pollutants occurring indoors,
their concentrations and health (WHO, 2010). Even
if the data for all pollutants were available, it
would be difficult to take into account all possible
interactions between pollutants, reactions occurring
between pollutants and all potential
A pragmatic approach for setting ventilation
requirements can be proposed by observing, in real
buildings, whether there is an elevated risk for
health and comfort complaints in the case when the
ventilation rate is at or below a certain level; this
approach is now being exercised by the HealthVent
project (Wargocki et al., 2012). The disadvantage of
this approach is that buildings can differ between
each other in terms of exposures and pollutants
occurring indoors, as well as by other factors which
are difficult to control, such as temperatures,
moisture level and relative humidity (RH), noise,
light, surroundings, etc. They all potentially can
have an impact on human response and can obscure
the relationship with ventilation. Furthermore,
different buildings can be populated by different
people and thus the experimental observations from
these buildings may not be representative for the
general population.
Several studies have been carried out to investigate
the relationship between ventilation and human
responses both in the laboratory and as field studies.
Summaries and critical assessments can be found in
many reviews published previously (e.g., Mendell,
1993; Godish and Spengler, 1996; Seppänen et al.,
1999; Seppänen et al., 2002; Wargocki et al., 2002;
Davies et al., 2004; Angell et al., 2005; Richardson
et al., 2005; Grimsrud, 2006; Bonnefoy, 2007; Li et
al., 2007; Bone et al., 2010; Sundell et al., 2011).
An important limitation of the previous studies on
ventilation and health is that they have each used
different methods to characterize ventilation and
human response outcome. This makes it very
difficult to compare the results obtained in these
different studies. In some studies proxies for
ventilation were used, such as the concentration of
carbon dioxide (CO2), as well as proxies for human
response outcomes, such as the concentration and
prevalence of house dust mite (HDM) allergens
because there is consistent evidence that the
prevalence of HDM allergens increases the risk of
asthma. Another predicament is that when the
performance of different ventilation systems were
compared in different buildings there was
insufficient control for potentially disturbing factors
such as differences in exposures to air pollutants. In
spite of these limitations the previous studies
provide direct data on the importance of ventilation
for human health and comfort.
The present work tries to recapitalize on the results
of these past studies and reviews, particularly with
regard to the importance of ventilation for health in
residential buildings.
1.2 Objective
The main objective of the present work was to
prepare a state-of-the-art report on ventilation and
health in homes. In particular, the following
research questions were addressed: (i) Does a
relationship exist between health and ventilation in
residential buildings?; (ii) What is the potential
reason for the observed relationship?; (iii) Which
health problems are related to ventilation?; (iv) Are
there any differences in prevalence of health
symptoms in residential buildings having different
ventilation systems?; (v) Are there any differences
in the prevalence of health problems among
different population groups?; and (vi) Does
ventilation itself contribute to the pollution of
indoor air in residential buildings?
2. Method
2.1 Approach
To address these research questions the following
approach was implemented: (i) hypotheses and
search terms were defined; (ii) a literature search
was performed; (iii) abstracts of all identified papers
and reports were screened; (iv) literature was
grouped as follows: literature providing information
on ventilation and its proxies, and health and its
proxies; literature providing information on
exposure ventilation and its proxies, but not on
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
health and its proxies; surveys and reviews; and
literature not relevant for the objective of the present
work; (v) reference lists in surveys and reviews
were screened to identify whether there were any
other papers that were missed in the literature
search, and if so they were included; and (vi) papers
providing information on ventilation and health,
addressing the objective, were reviewed and used to
form conclusions.
2.2 Literature Survey
Scientific literature on the association between
ventilation and health in nonindustrial residential
indoor environments was gathered by searching
through the following databases: MEDLINE by
National Library of Medicine; Cambridge Scientific
Abstracts (including Mechanical Engineering
Abstracts, Environmental Sciences and Pollution
Management Search sub-files, Biological Sciences
Search sub-files, TOXLINE, ERIC, Computer and
Information System Abstracts) and AIRBASE by
the Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC).
In addition, the Proceedings of Indoor Air, Healthy
Buildings, RoomVent, AIVC and CLIMA
congresses taking place in the last 10 years, i.e.
since 1999 were also surveyed.
The term “ventilation” was considered as both the
ventilation rate, i.e. amount of outdoor air supplied
to indoor spaces, and as the ventilation system, i.e.,
the way the air is supplied to indoor spaces – using
natural or mechanical forces, or combined, with or
without air-conditioning (AC). Proxies for
ventilation were also accepted including
concentration of CO2. Information on condensation
on windows was collected as a proxy for elevated
RH and low ventilation rate, but no specific term
was created for relative humidity in order not to
obscure the search. Health was considered to
follow the basic definition of the World Health
Organization (WHO, 1948): health is a state of
complete physical, mental and social well-being
and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
Proxies for health were also accepted, i.e.
pollutants for which there are documented effects
on health such as concentration of HDM allergens,
radon, etc. Nonindustrial residential indoor
environments were considered to represent all
kinds of housing: dwellings, row houses and
detached houses.
Only papers including records in each of the three
search categories were selected (as a source of
search records, keyword indexes of the international
conferences Indoor Air ’90, ’93 and ’99, and
Healthy Buildings ’97 and ’00 were used): (1) the
category “ventilation” including different records
pertaining to ventilation rates, e.g., air change rate,
air supply rate, etc., as well as ventilation systems,
e.g., infiltration, dedicated natural ventilation,
mechanical ventilation, etc.; (2) the category
“environment” including different records
pertaining to nonindustrial residential indoor
environments, e.g., dwellings, houses, etc.; and (3)
the category “health” including different records
pertaining to health, e.g. symptoms, diseases,
allergy, asthma, etc.; comfort and productivity were
not included.
3. Results
More than 140 papers and reports were identified
through the literature search. Among these, 34
documents were considered to provide information
relevant for the objective of the present work; their
details are given in Table 1. As many as 20 reviews
and surveys were identified on the topic of
ventilation and health. More than 60 papers were
irrelevant for the present work.
3.1 Asthma and Allergy Symptoms
Several studies, in some cases with large cohorts,
have been carried out to observe whether there is an
association between ventilation and asthma and
allergy symptoms. The results are inconsistent.
In studies with children, low ventilation rates were
strongly associated with increased risk of having
self-reported asthma and allergy symptoms (at least
2 out of 3 symptoms such as wheezing, eczema and
rhinitis) when conditions in homes of children with
symptoms (cases) and children without symptoms
(controls) were compared (Bornehag et al., 2005;
Hägerhed-Engman et al., 2009). The odds ratios
(indicating the risk) for wheezing and rhinitis were
significantly lower among infants in homes where
heat recovery ventilators were installed; similarly
there were reduced CO2 levels compared with
homes with placebo units without such a system
(Kovesi et al., 2009). Nocturnal chest tightness in
adults, a symptom of problems with the respiratory
system as a consequence of asthma, was associated
with higher CO2 levels indicating lower ventilation
rates in homes (Norbäck et al., 1995). Improper
ventilation defined as a ventilation problem was
associated with elevated risk of asthma (Ezratty et
al., 2003).
P Wargocki
Table 1. Short summary of studies considered relevant for the purpose of the present work;
AC=air conditioning; PM=particulate matter; GLM=general linear model; RR=response rate;
SBS=Sick Building Syndrome; HDM=house dust mites; RH=relative humidity; PFT=perfluorocarbon tracer;
SARS=severe acute respiratory syndrome; CFD=computational fluid dynamics.
Reference Results Design Buildings Population Ventilation
rate Ventilation
type Health
Bell et al.
Presence of AC
reduced PM
exposure and
health effects
through GLM
Houses (ca.
Elderly (>65
years old);
N/A N/A, only
whether AC
present or
absent (from
Mortality and
and respiratory
and PM2.5
Bornehag et
al. 2005
Engman et
al. 2009
rates associated
with the risk of
being the case
(having asthma
and allergy
Case-control 390 houses 198 cases
and 202
(from cohort
of 14,077)
with PFT
0.34 h-1
0.38 h-1
present and
eczema and
Clausen et
al. 2011
Toftum et al.
Bekö et al.
Ventilation rate
not associated
with being case
Case-base Houses Children,
200 cases
asthma and
and 293
bases among
which 15
were cases
(from cohort
of 11,082)
0.46 h-1 for
cases and
with CO2
present and
asthma and
eczema and
Coelho et al.
systems (dirty
filters, blocked
associated with
Elderly (60-
95 years
old), 96
N/A Mechanical Health
Deger et al.
Increased risk
of asthma for
leaving along
streets with
highly dense
traffic and on
ground floor
Homes Children
(n=980 out
of 7980)
N/A Only
Drinka et al.
Presence of
increased risk
of attack rates
of Influenza A
4 nursing
N/A Mechanical
with 0%,
30% and
Influenza A
Table continues on next page.
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
Table 1. (continued).
Reference Results Design Buildings Population Ventilation
rate Ventilation
type Health
Emenius et
al. 2004
No association
ventilation and
being a case
(but with RH
on windows
markers of
Case-control Homes Children
181 cases
and 359
from 4089
0.68±0.32 h-1,
69% >0.5 h-1
with PFT
present and
Engvall et
al. 2003
Presence of
system reduced
ocular and
231 multi-
3241 of
N/A With
present and
ocular, nasal,
dermal and
Engvall et
al. 2005
caused the air
to be perceived
as poor and
stuffy but had
no effects on
SBS symptoms
1-year cross-
44 people 0.5-0.8 h-1 vs.
reduced to
0.4-0.5 h-1
Mechanical SBS symptoms
Ezratty et al.
headache and
associated with
ventilation but
can also be
caused by other
in 8
N/A With forced
present and
et al. 1996
symptoms not
associated with
type of system;
complaints of
poor air quality
and mucous
related with
on windows
Homes 638 children N/A With
present and
absent l
Harving et
al., 1993
ventilation rate
of HDM
because of
higher RH
Homes 96 families
with at least
1 asthmatic
<0.25h-1 vs.
vs. >0.5 h-1
with PFT
present and
diagnosis of
asthma; skin
prick test
Harving et
al. 1994
rates reduced
HDM and RH
Case-control Houses 53 asthmatic
patients (of
which 23
0.4 to 1.5 h-1
with PFT
Mechanical N/A (measured
HDM as a
Table continues on next page.
P Wargocki
Table 1. (continued).
Reference Results Design Buildings Population Ventilation
rate Ventilation
type Health
Howieson et
al. 2003
Installation of
system with
heat recovery
(reduced HDM
and RH)
Case- control Houses 68
<15 years
old, 32 +17
in active
(cases) and
19 as
N/A Mechanical Health
symptoms and
peak flow
Jacobs et al.
Increased in
lead poisoning,
asthma and
associated with
increased use
of AC
Houses 2 national
register of
changes in
use of AC
from 1970s
to 2000s)
register of
Jones et al.
factors were
not associated
with case status
Case-control Houses Children,
from 11,000
matched by
age and
(incl. ducted
heating) and
other factors
related to
wheeze and
hay fever
Kishi et al.
ventilation not
associated with
risks of sick
houses of
Residents N/A With
present and
sick housing
Kovesi et al.
Installation of
reduced rhinitis
and wheeze
(and RH) and
had no effect
on health
encounters and
51 houses of
68 selected
Inuit infants
in 37 homes
with placebo
and 14 in
homes with
measured and
averaged 900
ppm with
system and
1,400 ppm
Mechanical Self-assessed
symptoms and
health centre
Leech et al.
cough, fatigue
and irritability
reduced for
Case-control Cases = 52
houses with
and best
houses in
the same
price range
128 cases
and 149
N/A Mechanical
Li et al.
CFD modelling
of wind
ventilation rate
and virus
spread between
Simulation by
CFD; no
N/A N/A With
infection rate
Table continues on next page.
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
Table 1. (continued).
Reference Results Design Buildings Population Ventilation
rate Ventilation
type Health
Risk of
doubled during
heat waves in
homes w/o AC
N/A N/A ( with
or w/o AC)
Mortality rate
Norbäck et
al. 1995
At high CO2
the prevalence
of nocturnal
(a symptom of
asthma) was
88 homes
(51% flats
and 40%
1,020 ppm
(natural) and
850 ppm
present and
and clinical
examination of
Øie et al.
Low air change
rates increased
risk of
Case-control Homes 172 cases
from Oslo
Birth cohort
and 172
Above and
below 0.5h-1,
with PFT
(also quartiles
6.9, 11.5 and
17.6 L/s per
present and
Palonen et
al. 2008
Air was
stuffy with
ventilation and
it was noisy
natural and
and cold floors
102 single
210 adults
and 152
(natural); 0.34
h-1 (exhaust)
and 0.4 h-1
PFT method
and in
present and
Rogot et al.
Risk of death
42% lower in
homes with
Homes n=72,740 N/A N/A (with or
w/o AC)
Mortality rate
et al. 1991
symptoms in
dwellings than
in houses;
symptoms in
houses with
ventilation and
in dwellings
and houses
present and
and SBS
Low air
changes rates
infestation of
29 homes N/A 0.1h-1 to
0.8 h-1
with PFT
N/A N/A (HDM, a
proxy for
Table continues on next page.
P Wargocki
Table 1. (continued).
Reference Results Design Buildings Population Ventilation
rate Ventilation
type Health
Warner et al.
Installation of
reduced HDM
and RH but no
effects on
12 months
40 houses 27 children
and 13
Aimed at
0.4-0.5 h-1
present and
with vacuum
asthma and
Measured lung
functions and
bronchial hypo
Willers et al.
between health
outcomes and
Homes 647 children
at age of 4
from 3,000
birth cohort
on asthma
and allergy
N/A Assessment
of whether
ventilation in
kitchen (with
gas cooking)
sufficient or
Blood samples,
respiratory and
Wong et al.
Prevalence of
symptoms was
higher in
dwellings with
3 residential
adults, 105
in naturally
and 58 in
with AC
CO2 up to
1,600 ppm in
with AC vs.
550-600 ppm
without AC
system (with
and w/o AC)
SBS symptoms
Wright et al.
Installation of
evening peak
expiratory flow
(not morning),
reduced RH
but not HDM
Homes 120 adults
with asthma
N/A, aimed to
0.5 h-1
present and
expiratory flow
Xu et al.
Exhaled breath
reduced ph
improved and
peak expiratory
flow improved
units with air
Homes 30 children
with asthma
CO2 averaged
1500 ppm
w/o system
800-900 ppm
with system
With and
w/o unit
system with
air cleaner
Exhaled breath
condensate and
peak expiratory
Yu et al.
infection rates
matched virus
predicted by
using plumes
and wind flows
no field
infection rates
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
Contrary to the above no association was observed
between ventilation rates in homes of children with
asthma and allergy symptoms (cases) and children
with and without symptoms (bases) in a study which
used a similar approach to that of Bornehag et al.
(2005) described above (Clausen et al., 2011).
Clausen et al. used a case-base design rather than
case-control design and they also used CO2
measurements to estimate ventilation rates rather
than a PFT method used by Bornehag et al. (2005).
This could, among other factors, contribute to the
different results obtained in both studies which
otherwise had the same protocols for registering
symptoms. Also, no association between ventilation
rate and self-estimated asthma and allergy
symptoms was observed when the odds ratios for
cases and controls were compared in a study of
Emenius et al. (2004) in which the PFT method was
used for ventilation rate measurements. In this study
RH and window-pane condensation (a marker of
elevated humidity) were however associated with
the elevated risk of symptoms.
Data on the presence and type of ventilation system
and increased risk of self-estimated asthma and
allergy symptoms have also shown to be
inconsistent. After installation of mechanical
ventilation with heat-recovery in homes where no
such system was previously present, the risk for
symptoms was reduced both for infants (Kovesi et
al., 2009) and adolescents (Howieson et al., 2003),
but not for the adults and children with asthma
(Warner et al., 2000). In the latter study the levels of
RH and HDM allergens were, however, reduced.
Homes judged to have sufficient or not sufficient
kitchen ventilation were not a risk factor for
respiratory and allergic symptoms among children
(Willers et al., 2006). Neither were the houses with
characteristics likely to affect indoor air quality,
other than ventilation (Jones et al., 1999), a study
that actually did not look specifically at the effect of
ventilation. Gustafsson et al. (1996) showed that
heating and ventilation systems were not associated
with allergy symptoms in children.
Ventilation rate and ventilation system type were in
some studies associated with exposures and markers
of exposures likely to cause allergic symptoms. One
of these markers is the concentration of HDM
allergens. Any methods and remedial actions
reducing this allergen can be considered as effective
methods for improving health conditions. Several
studies showed that increased ventilation rate
reduced the concentration of HDM allergens
(Harving et al., 1993; 1994; Sundell, 1994). Also
installation of a new mechanical ventilation system
in homes which did not previously have this system,
reduced the concentration of HDM allergens
(Warner et al., 2000). This was most likely because
the ventilation rates were increased. In these studies
no direct measurements of symptoms or complaints
among building occupants were made. In some
studies increased ventilation rate reduced RH, which
was often observed and documented by lack of
condensation on window panes. Also proliferation
of HDM allergens depends on moisture level and is
inhibited when the relative humidity is low. Because
both elevated RH and window-pane condensation
are indicators of potential dampness problems in
homes, which are considered to be strong risk
factors for health problems (Bornehag et al., 2001;
2004), these data suggest indirectly that increased
ventilation rate can reduce health problems by
reducing the moisture level in homes.
3.2 Building-Related Symptoms and Complaints
The presence of mechanical ventilation systems in
homes was associated with reduced self-estimated
health symptoms, typical of sick building syndrome
symptoms among adults, compared with homes
without mechanical ventilation (Engvall et al., 2003;
Leech et al., 2004; Palonen et al., 2004), probably
because of higher ventilation rates. This is implied
by Ruotsalainen et al. (1991) who showed that the
presence of mechanical ventilation was associated
with a lower prevalence of symptoms when the air
change rates were higher. Kishi et al. (2009) found
no relationship between the existence and operation
of mechanical ventilation systems and the risk of
building-related symptoms. Maintenance of the
mechanical ventilation system could cause the
inconsistency between the results from different
studies. For example, Coehlo et al. (2005) showed
that mechanical ventilation systems in homes having
dirty filters, blocked vents, etc. were associated with
increased rates of health complaints of elderly
people. Also noise generated by the mechanical
ventilation system could contribute to complaints
and cause the association between mechanical
ventilation systems and health complaints to be
inconsistent (Palonen et al., 2008).
Generally, no studies were found directly
associating ventilation rates in homes with self-
estimated building related symptoms. Indirectly
Wong et al. (2004) showed that houses where AC is
used increase the risk of health symptoms; these
houses were usually sealed and had much lower
ventilation rates. Indirect evidence on the
P Wargocki
association between ventilation and health was also
suggested in studies showing that increased
ventilation rate lowered the perceptions of poor air
quality and stuffy air (Engvall et al., 2005; Palonen
et al., 2008), under the assumption that these
perceptions are markers of a health risk.
3.3 Respiratory Tract/Lung Functions and
Bronchial Obstruction
Reduced ventilation rates were associated with the
risk of bronchial obstruction but only when homes
had verified dampness problems and plasticizer
containing surfaces (Øie et al., 1999). Increased
ventilation rates following installation of new
mechanical ventilation systems with heat recovery
in homes without such a system was associated with
improved lung functions (Wright et al., 2009; Xu et
al., 2010). In the study of Xu et al. the effect could
not be separated from the effect of an air cleaner
installed together with the system. No effect on lung
functions was observed by Warner et al. (2000) after
new mechanical ventilation systems were installed
in homes without such a system, although
ventilation rates were increased. In their study the
installation of mechanical ventilation systems
reduced levels of RH and HDM allergens.
Installation of heat recovery ventilators in homes of
infants, previously without such systems, brought
levels of CO2 down to 900 ppm compared with
placebo units installed in other homes where CO2
levels were 1400 ppm. Levels of RH were also
reduced but did not affect health centre encounters
and hospitalizations due to respiratory problems
(Kovesi et al., 2009). Actually, no hospitalizations
occurred during the study. Since the population of
homes where interventions were made was small it
was unlikely to expect that a rather small change in
ventilation would have a strong effect on respiratory
problems that can be demonstrated by the effect on
3.4 Infectious Diseases
No studies have been found that directly associate
infectious diseases with the ventilation rate or type
of ventilation system in homes. However, the design
of ventilation systems should avoid mixing of return
air with supply air and assure proper air distribution,
considering that increased recirculation of air in
nursing homes was associated with an increased risk
of attack rates of Influenza A among the elderly
(Drinka et al., 1996). Also air distribution played an
important role in the spread of SARS (Yu et al.,
2004; Li et al., 2005).
3.5 Other Outcomes
Studies with other health outcomes than those listed
above have also been found including mortality,
cardiovascular hospitalizations, obesity and lead
poisoning. None of them was directly associated
with either ventilation rate, ventilation system type,
or the maintenance of ventilation systems in homes.
These are mentioned here only because the data
provide some indirect evidence.
Use of central AC in homes has been shown to
reduce exposure to particulate matter (PM) mainly
from outdoor traffic, and was associated with
reduced cardiovascular and respiratory
hospitalizations, as well as mortality among the
elderly (Bell et al., 2009). The data on both AC and
health outcomes were obtained from the local
community registers and it is difficult to judge
whether proximity to PM sources outdoors was
included in the models. Nevertheless, it can be
hypothesized that reducing exposures to outdoor
sources, by e.g. sealing houses, which is usually the
case when central AC are used, may have a positive
effect on health. This is somewhat confirmed by
studies of Deger et al. (2010), who showed that
children living along streets with highly dense
traffic have an increased risk of asthma, particularly
for children living on the ground floor and having
no adequate control of pollution causing asthma.
Proper filtration of outdoor air would thus be
important. Sealing houses can, at the same time,
reduce the outdoor air supply rate which may be
detrimental for health as well.
The data from two national longitudinal studies in
the US on house characteristics show that increased
use of AC, resulting in most cases in lowered
ventilation rates as a response to energy saving, was
associated with obesity and lead poisoning (Jacobs
et al., 2009). It must be emphasized though that
many other factors could also contribute to the
observed association including changes in lifestyle,
nutrition, etc. AC has also been shown, in many
studies, to reduce mortality for elderly during hot
weather (Marmor, 1978; Rogot et al., 1992). This is
most likely due to control of indoor temperature by
cooling, but may also be caused by reduced
exposure to outdoor air pollutants occurring during
hot weather because AC is often associated with
sealing houses.
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
4. Discussion
The present data provide important reference
material to the project HealthVent defining health-
based ventilation guidelines for Europe
( (Wargocki et al., 2012). The
guidelines will have two parts, one prescribing rates
at which ventilation is supplied to reduce health
risks among the population exposed in buildings,
and on prescribing how to achieve compliance,
proper design, operation and maintenance of
ventilation systems. Both aspects are addressed in
the reviewed studies.
4.1 Ventilation Rate in Homes and Health
The results of studies on ventilation and health risks
in homes suggest that increased ventilation rates,
also demonstrated by reduced concentration of CO2,
generally reduce health problems; only in a few
cases were no effect or reverse effect observed.
To observe which level of ventilation rate can be
considered to protect people in homes against
negative health effects Figures 1 and 2 were created.
Figure 1 shows that increasing ventilation rate
consistently reduced the concentration of HDM
allergens in houses. The effect was significant over
a large range of ventilation rates, from about 0.1 to
1.4 h-1, suggesting that there can be a dose–response
relationship, i.e. a lower concentration of HDM
allergens when ventilation rate is increased. Lung
functions were seen to be improved by ventilation
rates above 0.5 h-1, but the data are only from one
study so it would be imprudent to form
recommendations based only on these results. For
self-reported asthma and allergy symptoms the
results seem to be equivocal and only one study
shows that increased ventilation rate reduced the
risk of asthma/allergy; in two studies no statistically
significant effect was observed. Figure 2 shows that
lowering CO2 levels, i.e. increasing ventilation rate,
reduced significantly symptoms of asthma and
allergy. No effects of increased ventilation rate on
SBS symptoms were shown, and sometimes
symptoms increased with increased ventilation rate
(Figure 1). Only one study showed that reduced
CO2, i.e. increased ventilation rate, reduced
symptoms (Figure 2). These results suggest that this
health outcome may not be very sensitive to changes
in ventilation in homes, although SBS symptoms are
clearly associated with changes in ventilation rates
Figure 1. Ventilation rate in homes and health; black bars show the studies in which increase in ventilation rate
caused statistically significant reduction in health outcomes; empty bars show that health outcome has not been
statistically significantly changed in the indicated range of air change rates, while grey bars show that increasing
ventilation rates increased significantly health problems.
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6
Borne hagetal(2005)
(lung functions)
(asthma &aller gy)
(house dustmites)
(SBS symptoms)
(SBS symptoms)
(housedust mites)
P Wargocki
in offices (Seppänen et al., 1999; Wargocki et al.,
2002; Sundell et al., 2011).
Taking only the studies in which significant effects
of ventilation rate on health were observed, the
minimum ventilation rate in homes at which no
health risk exist seems to be about 0.4 h-1 (Figure 1).
This is the lowest ventilation rate at which no
increased health risk was observed in the reviewed
literature. This level is close to the requirements of,
e.g. Danish Building Regulations (BR10, 2010) set
at 0.5 h-1, as well as the measured ventilation rates
in US residencies, which is from 0.5 to 0.7 h-1
(Pandian et al., 1998). Taking the studies in which
significant effects of CO2 on health were observed,
the maximum level of CO2 in homes at which no
health risk was observed seem to be about 900 ppm
(Figure 2).
4.2 Ventilation System in Homes and Health
Present results show consistently that newly
installed mechanical ventilation systems reduced
health risks in homes. The reason for this is most
likely that outdoor air supply rates were also
increased when the system was installed, and the
system when new was not a source of pollution.
Furthermore, the installation of a mechanical
ventilation system could also contribute to fixing
other problems in homes which could, if existing,
contribute to health problems, such as e.g. leaky
roof, unsealed ceilings, etc.
Present results show also that there was less evident
effect on health in buildings with already existing
mechanical ventilation systems. Mechanical
ventilation systems can become strong pollution
sources as a result of their poor maintenance, as e.g.
shown in a recently published study in 299 Dutch
homes (Dijken et al., 2011). Although there is a
wealth of data showing that dirty filters and dirty
ventilation systems contribute to elevated health
risks (e.g., Sieber et al., 1996; Seppänen et al., 2002;
Mendell et al., 2003; 2008), these data are mainly
from offices. On the other hand the present survey
found no studies which associated the maintenance
of ventilation systems in homes with health. Only
the study of Coehlo et al. (2005) showed association
between improper operation of the system (blocked
vents, switched-off fans, etc.) and elevated health
complaints. Poor performance of ventilation systems
could also contribute to less evident effects on
health in buildings with existing mechanical
ventilation systems. Mechanical ventilation systems
should be properly designed, balanced and operated
because, as shown by Palonen et al. (2005), they can
become a source of nuisance, e.g. due to increased
noise levels indoors. This result was confirmed
recently by Bogers et al. (2011).
No studies were found which associated dedicated
natural ventilation systems and hybrid systems with
4.3 Source Control and Filtration
Increasing ventilation rates reduces the
concentration of HDM allergens. These results may
also suggest that ventilation modifies moisture
levels, thus it is modifying conditions which are
Figure 2. Concentration of CO2 in homes and health; black bars show the studies in which reduction of CO2
(i.e. increase in ventilation rate) caused statistically significant reduction in health outcomes.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Norbac ketal.(1995)
Carbondioxideconce ntr at ion(ppm)
(asthma &allergy )
(asthmaandalle rgy)
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
promoting the proliferation of HDM. Most of the
studies on the association between HDM allergens
and ventilation were performed in Nordic countries
and in the UK, where increased ventilation rates
during cold periods reduce RH in homes, thereby
inhibiting the growth of mites. Reduction of
moisture has also many other benefits for health, as
moisture is generally known to be a marker of
elevated health risk in homes (Bornehag et al.,
Too low RH can also cause problems and could be
one of the reasons why Ruotsalainen et al. (1991)
observed in Finland that increased ventilation rate
caused an increase of SBS symptoms, such as
dryness, nasal problems and itching. Their study
was actually performed from November to April so
it is likely that RH was quite low, although
measured to be on average approximately 36%.
Moisture can also be controlled by creating barriers
in the building structure and/or local exhaust in
laundries, bathrooms and kitchens, as well as by the
banning of drying of laundry in spaces where people
Ventilation air can also transport outdoor pollutants
(particles, pollens, etc.) into indoor spaces. This is
suggested by studies of Bell et al. (2009) who
showed that the use of AC reduced health effects
related with PM from outdoors because houses were
sealed. These results show the connection between
indoor and outdoor environment and the need for
reducing exposures to particles entraining indoors.
This should rather be achieved by, e.g. efficient
filtration, than by sealing homes, i.e. reducing
ventilation rates, which can also be detrimental for
health. The risk of elevated health effects due to
exposure to particles will depend on the location of
houses (urban, rural), proximity to outdoor sources,
etc. Again, reviewed studies have not sufficiently
documented these factors so it is difficult to assess
their impact on the presented results.
4.4 Populations Studied
Among all studies reviewed in the present report,
thirteen studies concerned health risks for children,
twelve for adults and five for the elderly. They have
thus reasonably well addressed different population
All studies that did not show association between
ventilation system type and ventilation rate and self-
reported asthma and allergy symptoms were carried
out with children. In most cases the prevalence of
asthma and allergy is based on parental reports (self-
assessments). Perhaps this caused inconsistent
results. Verification of parental reports with
objective methods would be useful.
All studies in which there was no association
between ventilation type and/or ventilation rate, and
self-reported SBS symptoms concerned adults.
In the case of exposure of the elderly none of the
studies showed direct association between
ventilation type and or ventilation rate and health
4.5 Limitations
There are numerous confounding factors that could
influence and disturb the observed associations.
They include among others: study design,
controlling and measuring of ventilation rates,
differences in source strength; interactions between
sources and ventilation rates; dose-response effects
that are likely to be log-linear; ventilation systems
as sources of pollution, multifactorial genesis of
health problems, climatic differences, different
thresholds of effects for people and location of the
study, as well as different methods by which health
outcomes were measured.
Quality of data plays an important role when
forming conclusions on ventilation and health. No
attempt however was made in the present report to
grade the studies according to their quality as
regards experimental design, measurements and
analysis of results.
If such a grading had been based on the study
design, case-base, case-control and placebo-
controlled interventions with double blinding would
be ranked high while cross-sectional studies and
longitudinal observations would be ranked quite
low. In the former, many of the confounding factors
are controlled experimentally while in the latter the
control can only be made by adjusting the statistical
models for the factors likely to obscure the
If such a grading had been based on the method of
ventilation measurements, the method using
perfluorocarbon as tracer (PFT method) would be
ranked high (although largely debated as regards its
accuracy in the scientific community) because it
accounts only for outdoor air supply rate, while
using CO2 would be ranked low because the
calculated ventilation rates provide information on
P Wargocki
total dilution including outdoor air and make-up air
(the air from other rooms in a house) rather than
only outdoor air supply rate (Bekö et al., 2009) as is
the case for PFT method.
If such a grading had been based on categorization
of the ventilation systems, the studies which
installed mechanical ventilation systems would be
ranked high compared with the buildings with
existing mechanical ventilation systems because of
their good maintenance and close to design
performance. Also studies in which categorization
of the system had been made through inspections
rather by examining registers or blue-prints would
be ranked high because they would use the actual
data rather than unverified information.
The grading could have also been made based on the
measurements of health outcomes. Many studies
used self-administered questionnaires and may be
ranked low compared to objective medical
measurements and/or diagnosis made by the doctors
which would be ranked high. However using
questionnaires is the most efficient, low-cost
method of collecting data, widely used in large
epidemiological studies of the type discussed in the
present report. Besides, there is some evidence on
the consistency between self-reports of health
problems and doctor-diagnosed health problems.
Even if objective medical measurements had been
used, the information on the thresholds at which
health effects are observed would be needed. These
can vary between people and in many cases are not
available. Also lack of the effect on objectively
measured health symptoms does not preclude the
effect on health, especially if the objective method is
not properly selected and not properly applied.
Consequently the studies in which self-reported and
doctor-diagnosed symptoms were used can be
ranked evenly.
It is worth noting that consistent observations
regarding associations between ventilation rate and
ventilation system and health stem generally from
the studies which would have been ranked high.
4.6 Implications for Future Work
Present results show that more evidence of the role
of ventilation for health is needed. Despite the
paramount importance of ventilation, especially
considering the impact on energy, it has not
received proper attention. The need for reducing
energy and future buildings being much tighter than
today will require that the proper ventilation of
homes, obtained by, e.g. mechanical systems with
heat recovery in cold periods and dedicated natural
ventilation systems in warm periods, will be the
essential part of the future building structure.
The performance of different ventilation solutions
and their impact on health should be better
understood. There is an obvious need for producing
guidelines as regards commissioning and
installation as well as maintenance of systems
supplying air to indoor spaces, not only for
mechanical systems but also for other systems.
Regular inspections of ventilation systems can be
forced, as it is done for example in Sweden
(Boverket, 2009); these inspections can actually
become a part of energy certification of buildings.
Future studies should try to answer the fundamental
question on how much ventilation is actually
needed. This question is only partially answered by
the present report due to limited data and the
limitations of different studies. A series of studies
on ventilation and health would be needed to answer
this question. They should take into account all
possible limitations and, what is probably most
important, should link ventilation to actual
exposures, admitting thus that ventilation is not a
mitigation measure and should not be used as such.
5. Conclusions
Ventilation rate in homes is associated with
health in particular with asthma, allergy, airway
obstruction and SBS symptoms. This
association is based on the limited evidence.
Ventilation rates above 0.4 h-1 or CO2 below
900 ppm in homes seem to protect against
health risks.
No specific ventilation system can be
recommended to provide minimum ventilation
Increasing ventilation rates in homes reduces
house dust mites known to cause allergic
symptoms, most likely because of reduced
moisture levels which inhibits their
Newly installed mechanical ventilation systems
nearly always reduced the risk of health
problems. This was not the case for buildings
with existing mechanical ventilation systems,
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
most likely due to their poor maintenance, lack
of commissioning, regular checks and
inspections, etc.
Buildings in which air conditioning is installed
increase the risk of health problems probably
due to lowered ventilation rates (tightening and
sealing of buildings to reduce energy).
No differences were observed in the prevalence
of health problems between different age
groups, children, adults and elderly.
A series of studies on ventilation and health in
buildings with different ventilation systems
would be desirable.
6. Practical Implications
Required ventilation rates depend strongly on
exposures, i.e. with a high load of pollution more
ventilation is needed than if the loads are low. The
ventilation rates can be reduced by controlling
sources of pollution both being of outdoor origin
(e.g., particulate matter) and indoor origin (e.g.,
relative humidity (RH), particulate matter (PM),
house dust mite (HDM) allergens, emissions from
building products and appliances, anthropogenic
emissions). Future homes should secure proper
control of exposures to pollutants in order to reduce
health risks for occupants on one hand, and at the
same time they should secure that the energy needed
to support sufficient ventilation is as low as
possible. This control can be implemented by
different solutions including provision of sufficient
ventilation, which should be closely connected to
estimated exposures.
Different ventilation systems can be applied from
dedicated natural ventilation systems, hybrid
systems to mechanical ventilation systems with heat
recovery, all depending on the conditions which
promote application of one system over another.
Ventilation should not be considered to be the only
mitigation measure to control exposures but
complementary and supplementary to other
measures, such as, e.g. source control, air cleaning
and/or local exhausts. These measures are easy to
implement in newly constructed homes, and more
difficult but still possible to apply in existing homes
unless they are renovated or refurbished.
It is of utmost importance that systems securing
ventilation rates in homes are inspected for their
performance. Regular annual or bi-annual
inspections should be implemented and regulated so
that the proper operation and maintenance of
systems is ensured. They can become, e.g., a part of
energy audits, chimney sweep control, etc., or can
be performed completely separately.
Thanks are due to Velux A/S for supporting present
work. Thanks are due to Nuno da Silva, M.Sc. for
finding the literature and for creating the data base
with articles used to prepare the present paper.
Angell WJ, Grimsrud DT and Lee H: (2005)
“Residential indoor air quality, ventilation and
building-related health effects: Critical review of
scientific literature”, Proceedings of Indoor Air
2005, Beijing, China, on CDROM.
ASHRAE: (2010) “Standard 62.1-2010: Ventilation
for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality”, Atlanta, GA,
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-
Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
Bekö G, Lund T, Nors F, Toftum J and Clausen G:
(2010) “Ventilation rates in the bedrooms of 500
Danish children”, Building and Environment, 45,
(10), pp2289-2295.
Bell ML, Ebisu K, Peng RD and Dominici F: (2009)
“Adverse health effects of particulate air pollution.
Modification by air conditioning”, Epidemiology,
20, (5), pp682-686.
Bogers R, Jongeneel R, Van Kamp I and Koudijs E:
(2011) “Health and well being in relation to the
quality of ventilation systems in newly built
dwellings in the Netherlands”, Proceedings of
Indoor Air 2011, Austin, Texas, USA, (CDROM).
Bone A, Murray V, Myers I, Dengel A and
Crump D: (2010) “Will drivers for home energy
efficiency harm occupant health”, Perspectives in
Public Health, 130, (5), pp233-238.
Bonnefoy X: (2007) “Inadequate housing and
health: an overview”, Int. J. Environment and
Pollution, 30, Nos.3/4, pp411-429.
Bornehag C-G, Blomquist G, Gyntelberg F,
Järvholm B, Malmberg P, Nordvall L, Nielsen A,
P Wargocki
Pershagen G and Sundell J: (2001) “Dampness in
Buildings and Health”, Indoor Air, 11, (2), pp72-86.
Bornehag CG, Sundell J, Bonini S, Custovic A,
Malmberg P, Skerfving S, Sigsgaard T and
Verhoeff A: (2004) “Dampness in buildings as a
risk factor for health effects, EUROEXPO: a
multidisciplinary review of the literature (1998–
2000) on dampness and mite exposure in buildings
and health effects”, Indoor Air, 14, (4), pp243-257.
Bornehag CG, Sundell J, Hägerhed-Engmann L and
Sigsgaard T: (2005) “Association between
ventilation rates in 390 Swedish homes and allergic
symptoms in children”, Indoor Air, 15, pp275-280.
Boverket: (2009) “Regelsamling för funktionskontroll
av ventilationssystem”, OVK.
BR: (2010) “Danish Building Regulations BR2010”,
Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority.
Clausen G, Høst A, Toftum J, et al: (2011)
“Children’s health and its association with indoor
environment in Danish homes and day care centres
– Methods”, Indoor Air, In the Press.
Coelho C, Steers M, Lutzler P and Schriver-
Mazzuoli L: (2005) “Indoor air pollution in old
peopleʼs homes related to some health problems: a
survey study”, Indoor Air, 15, (4), pp267-274.
Davies M, Ucci M, McCarthy M, Oreszczyn T,
Ridley I, Mumovic D, Singh J and Pretlove
respiratory health: a focus on house dust mites and
mould”, International Journal of Ventilation, 3, (2),
Deger L, Plante C, Goudreau S, et al : (2010) “Home
environmental factors associated with poor asthma
control in Montreal children: a population-based
study”, Journal of Asthma, 47, (5), pp513-520.
Dijken van F, Balvers JR and Boerstra AC: (2011)
“The quality of mechanical ventilation system in
newly built Dutch dwellings, Proceedings of Indoor
Air 2011, Austin, Texas, USA, (on CDROM).
Drinka PJ, Krause P, Schilling M, Miller BA, Shult
P and Gravenstein S: (1996) “Report of an outbreak:
nursing home architecture and influenza-a attack
rates”, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,
44, pp910-913.
ECA (European Collaborative Action “Indoor Air
Quality and its Impact on Man”): (1992)
“Guidelines for Ventilation Requirements in
Buildings”, Luxembourg, Office for Publications of
the European Communities, Report No. 11 (EUR
14449 EN).
Emenius G, Svartengren M, Korsgaard J, Nordvall
L, Pershagen G and Wickman M: (2004) “Building
characteristics, indoor air quality and recurrent
wheezing in very young children (BAMSE)”,
Indoor Air, 14, pp34-42.
EN15251: (2007) “European Standards EN 15251-
Indoor environmental input parameters for design
and assessment of energy performance of buildings
addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment,
lighting and acoustics”.
Engvall K, Norrby C and Norbäck D: (2003)
“Ocular, nasal, dermal and respiratory symptoms in
relation to heating, ventilation, energy conservation,
and reconstruction of older multi-family houses”,
Indoor Air, 13, (3), pp206-11.
Engvall K and Wickman P: (2005) “Perceived
indoor environment and sick building syndrome
(SBS) in relation to energy saving by seasonally
adapted ventilation : a one year intervention study in
dwellings”, Proceedings of Indoor Air 2005,
Beijing, China, (on CDROM).
EPBD: (2010) “Energy Performance of Building
Directive”, European Commission.
Ezratty V, Duburcq A, Emery C and Lambrozo J:
(2003) “Residential Thermal Comfort, Weather-
Tightness and Ventilation : Links With Health in a
European Study (Lares)”, Building, pp1-11.
Fisk WJ, Black D and Brunner G: (2011) “Benefits
and costs of improved IEQ in U.S. offices”, Indoor
Air, 21, pp357-367.
Gustafsson D, Andersson K, Fagerlund I and
Kjellma, NIM: (1996) “Significance of indoor
environment for the development of allergic
symptoms in children followed up to 18 months of
age”, Allergy, 51, pp789-795.
Grimsrud DT: (2006) “Ventilation standards and
high performance buildings”, ASHRAE IAQ
Applications, Winter, pp10-12.
Godish T and Spengler JD: (1996) “Relationships
between ventilation and indoor air quality: A
review”, Indoor Air, 6, pp135-14.
Hägerhed-Engman L, Bornehag C-G and Sundell J:
(2009) “Building characteristics associated with
moisture related problems in 8,918 Swedish
International Journal of Ventilation ISSN 1473-3315 Volume 12 No 2 September 2013
dwellings”, Int. J. Environ Health Res, 19, (4),
Hägerhed-Engman L, Sigsgaard T, Samuelson I, et
al: (2009) “Low home ventilation rate in
combination with moldy odor from the building
structure increase the risk for allergic symptoms in
children”, Indoor Air, 19, (3), pp184-92.
Harving H, Korsgaard J and Dahl R: (1994) “Clinical
efficacy of reduction in house-dust mite exposure in
specially designed, mechanically ventilated ‘healthy
homes”, Allergy, 49, pp866-870.
Harving, H., Korsgaard, J. and Dahl, R. (1993)
“House-dust mites and associated environmental
conditions in Danish homes,” Allergy, 48, pp106-109.
Howieson S, Lawson A, McSharry C, et al: (2003)
“Domestic ventilation rates, indoor humidity and
dust mite allergens: are our homes causing the
asthma pandemic?” Building Services Engineering
Research and Technology, 24, (3), pp137-147.
Jacobs DE, Wilson J, Dixon SL, Smith J and Evens A:
(2009) “The relationship of housing and population
health: a 30-year retrospective analysis”. Environmental
Health Perspectives, 117, (4), pp597-604.
Jones RC, Hughes CR, Wright D and Baumer JH:
(1999) “Early house moves, indoor air, heating
methods and asthma”. Respiratory Medicine, 93,
(12), pp919-922.
Kishi R, Saijo Y, Kanazawa A, et al : (2009)
“Regional differences in residential environments
and the association of dwellings and residential
factors with the sick house syndrome: a nationwide
cross-sectional questionnaire study in Japan”.
Indoor Air, 19, (3), pp243-54.
Kovesi T, Zaloum C, Stocco C, Fugler D, Dales RE,
Ni A, Barrowman N, Gilbert NL and Miller JD:
(2009) “Heat recovery ventilators prevent
respiratory disorders among Inuit children”. Indoor
Air, 19, pp489-499.
Leech JA, Raizenne M and Gusdorf J: (2004)
“Health in occupants of energy efficient new
homes”. Indoor Air, 14, (3), pp169-73.
Li Y, Huang X, Yu ITS, Wong TW and Qian H:
(2005) “Role of air distribution in SARS
transmission during the largest nosocomial outbreak
in Hong Kong”, Indoor Air, 15, pp83-95.
Li Y, Leung GM, Tang JW, Yang X, Chao CYH,
Lin JZ, Lu JW, Nielsen PV, Niu J, Qian H, Sleigh
AC, Su H-JJ, Sundell J, Wong TW and Yuen PL:
(2007) “Role of ventilation in airborne transmission
of infectious agents in the built environment – a
multidisciplinary systematic review”. Indoor Air,
17, pp2–18.
Marmor M: (1978) “Heat wave mortality in nursing
homes”. Environmental Research, 17, pp102-115.
Mendell MJ: (1993) “Non-specific symptoms in
office workers: a review and summary of the
epidemiologic literature”. Indoor Air, 3, pp227-236.
Mendell MJ, Naco GM, et al: (2003)
“Environmental risk factors and work-related lower
respiratory symptoms in 80 office buildings: an
exploratory analysis of NIOSH data”. Am J Ind
Med, 43, (6), pp630-41.
Mendell MJ, Lei-Gomez Q, Mirer AG, Seppänen O
and Brunner G: (2008) “Risk factors in heating,
ventilating, and air-conditioning systems for
occupant symptoms in US office buildings: the US
EPA BASE study”. Indoor Air, 18, pp301–316.
Norbäck D, Björnsson E, Janson C, Widström J and
Boman G: (1995) “Asthmatic symptoms and
volatile organic compounds, formaldehyde, and
carbon dioxide in dwellings”. Occupational and
Environmental Medicine, 52, pp388-395.
Øie L, Nafstad P, Botten G, Magnus P and Jaakkola
JK: (1999) “Ventilation in homes and bronchial
obstruction in young children”. Epidemiology, 10,
Palonen J, Kurnitski J and Eskols L: (2008) “Thermal
comfort and perceived air quality in 102 Finnish
single-family houses” Proceedings of Indoor Air
2008, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, on CDROM.
Pandian MD, Behar JV, Ott WR, Wallance LA,
Wilson AL, Colome SD and Koontz M: (1998)
“Correcting errors in the nationwide database of
residential air exchange rates”. Journal of Exposure
Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 8, (4),
pp577- 586.
Richardson G, Eick S and Jones R: (2005) “How is
the indoor environment related to asthma?: literature
review”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, (3),
Ruotsalainen R, Jaakkola JJK, Rönnberg R,
Majanen A and Seppänen O: (1991) “Symptoms
and perceived indoor air quality among occupants of
houses and apartments with different ventilation
systems”. Indoor Air, 1, pp428-438.
P Wargocki
Seppänen O and Fisk W: (2002) “Association of
ventilation system type with SBS symptoms in
office workers”, Indoor Air, 12, pp98-112.
Seppänen OA, Fisk WJ and Mendell MJ: (1999)
“Association of ventilation rates and CO2-
concentrations with health and other responses in
commercial and institutional buildings”, Indoor Air,
9, pp226-252.
Sieber WK, Stayner LT, Malkin R, Petersen MR,
Mendell MJ, Wallingford KM, Crandall MS,
Wilcox TG and Reed L: (1996) “The National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health indoor
environmental evaluation experience. Part three:
Associations between environmental factors and
self-reported health conditions”, Applied
Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 11,
Sundell J, Wickman M, Pershagen G and Nordvall
SL: (1994) !Ventilation in homes infested by house-
dust mites”, Allergy, 50, pp106-112.
Sundell J, Levin H, Nazaroff WW, Cain WS, Fisk
WJ, Grimsrud DT, Gyntelberg F, Li Y, Persily AK,
Pickering AC, Samet JM, Spengler JD, Taylor ST
and Weschler CJ: (2011) “Ventilation rates and
health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific
literature”, Indoor Air, 21, pp191–204.
Toftum J, Clausen G, Bekö G, Callesen M,
Weschler CJ, Langer S, Andersen B and Høst A:
(2009) “A case-base study of residential IEQ related
risk factors and parental reports of asthma and
allergy among 500 Danish children – IECH, In.
Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2009, Syracuse,
Toftum J, Bekö G, Weschler CJ, Callesen M,
Sundell J, Bornehag CG, Sigsgaard T, Høst A and
Clausen G: (2011) “Parental reports of asthma and
allergy symptoms among Danish children –
Prevalences and associations with dwelling and
occupant characteristics”, Indoor Air, submitted.
Wargocki P: (2011) “Productivity and Health
Effects of High Indoor Air Quality”, In Nriagu, JO
ed. Encyclopaedia of Environmental Health,
Burlington: Elsevier, pp688-693.
Wargocki P and HealthVent Group: (2012)
“Principles of ventilation guidelines based on health
(HealthVent project)”, In Proceedings of Healthy
Buildings 2012, Brisbane, In press.
Wargocki P, Sundell J, Bischof W, Brundrett G,
Fanger PO, Gyntelberg F, Hanssen SO, Harrison P,
Pickering A, Seppänen O and Wouters P: (2002)
"Ventilation and Health in Nonindustrial Indoor
Environments. Report from a European
Multidisciplinary Scientific Consensus Meeting”,
Indoor Air, 12, pp113-128.
Warner JA, Frederick JM, Bryant TN, Wiech C, Raw
GJ, Hunter C, Stephen FR, McIntyre DA and Warner
JO: (2000) “Mechanical ventilation and high-
efficiency vacuum cleaning: a combined strategy of
mite and mite allergen reduction in the control of
mite-sensitive asthma”, Journal of Allergy and
Clinical Immunology, 105, pt 1, pp75-82.
WHO: (1948) “The constitution of World Health
Organization”, World Health Organization.
WHO: (2010) “WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air
Quality, Selected Pollutants”, World Health
Organization, Regional Office for Europe.
Willers SM, Brunekreef B, Oldenwening M, et al.:
(2006) “Gas cooking, kitchen ventilation, and
asthma, allergic symptoms and sensitization in
young children--the PIAMA study”, Allergy, 61, (5),
Wong N: (2009) “Comparative study of the indoor
air quality of naturally ventilated and air-
conditioned bedrooms of residential buildings in
Singapore”, Building and Environment, 39, (9),
Wright GR, Howieson S, McSharry C, et al: (2009)
“Effect of improved home ventilation on asthma
control and house dust mite allergen levels”,
Allergy, 64, (11), pp1671-80.
Xu Y, Raja S, Ferro AR, et al: (2010) “Effectiveness
of heating, ventilation and air conditioning system
with HEPA filter unit on indoor air quality and
asthmatic children’s health”, Building and
Environment, 45, (2), pp330-337.
Yu IT, Li Y, Wong TW, Tam W, Chan AT, Lee JH,
Leung DY and Ho T: (2004) “Evidence of airborne
transmission of the severe acute respiratory
syndrome virus”, N. Engl. J. Med., 350, pp1731-
... Accumulating evidence demonstrated that air pollutants including particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur and nitrogen oxides, methane, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detrimental to cognitive function among older adults [4][5][6]. In addition to outdoor air pollution, indoor air quality may have a substantial impact on individuals' health, especially among older adults who spend around 85% of their time indoors [7][8][9][10]. Epidemiological studies showed that indoor air pollution caused by cooking fuels and incense burning was associated with poor cognitive performance among older adults [11,12]. ...
... It has been documented that indoor ventilation, supplying air to indoor areas by natural or mechanical forces such as windows and air-conditioners, was able to mitigate the adverse effect of indoor air pollution on health among older adults [7,13]. However, previous studies mainly revealed that a better house ventilation rate was associated with a lower risk of asthma and allergy symptoms, respiratory and lung diseases, and cognitive function among younger populations such as children and office workers in developed regions [7,14,15]. ...
... It has been documented that indoor ventilation, supplying air to indoor areas by natural or mechanical forces such as windows and air-conditioners, was able to mitigate the adverse effect of indoor air pollution on health among older adults [7,13]. However, previous studies mainly revealed that a better house ventilation rate was associated with a lower risk of asthma and allergy symptoms, respiratory and lung diseases, and cognitive function among younger populations such as children and office workers in developed regions [7,14,15]. Few epidemiological investigations, to our knowledge, evaluated the association between indoor ventilation frequency and cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults. ...
Full-text available
Backgrounds Emerging evidence suggested that indoor air pollution caused long-term adverse effects on cognitive function among older adults who spend more than 85% of their time indoors. Although high indoor ventilation can mitigate the effect of indoor air pollution on cognition among the younger population, limited evidence revealed the association between indoor ventilation and cognition among older adults. Methods A total of 11,853 participants aged 65 and over (female, 54.5%; mean age, 83.6 years) were included from the 2017–2018 wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Indoor ventilation frequency was measured by the self-reported frequency of opening windows per week in each season. Cognitive function was evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Multivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was applied to assess the association between overall indoor ventilation frequency and cognitive function. We fitted in two adjusted models: Model 1 was adjusted for demographic; model 2 was further adjusted for lifestyle, socioeconomic status, health conditions, and environmental factors. The same models were also applied to measure the association between seasonal indoor ventilation frequency and cognitive function. Results Of 11,853 older adults, 3035 (25.6%) had cognitive impairment. A high overall indoor ventilation frequency (indoor ventilation frequency: 6–8) was significantly associated with a 9% lower likelihood of cognitive impairment than low overall indoor ventilation frequency (indoor ventilation frequency: 0–3) among Chinese older adults [Relative risk (RR): 0.91, 95% Confidential Interval (CI): 0.83–0.99] in the full adjusted model. In the subgroup analysis in four seasons, high and intermediate indoor ventilation frequency in winter were significantly associated with 8% (RR: 0.92; 95%CI: 0.86–0.99) and 16% (RR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.78–0.90) lower probability of cognitive impairment than low indoor ventilation frequency in the fully adjusted model among Chinese older adults, respectively. Conclusions In this nationally representative cohort, a higher frequency of house ventilation by opening windows was significantly associated with a lower risk of cognitive impairment among Chinese older adults aged 65 and over. These results offered robust evidence for policymaking and health intervention to prevent older adults from cognitive impairment or dementia in developing regions.
... Occupants also require ventilation to maintain good health. As explained in the companion paper , the simulations maintained the minimum 0.4 ACH recommendation during occupancy periods (Ramos et al., 2015;Wargocki, 2018). Where lower levels of air permeability are achieved, Part L regulations require purpose provided ventilation (DECLG, 2011). ...
Full-text available
Home energy retrofit has recurred in public policy throughout recent decades. However, the savings in energy usage attributable to home retrofit have remained difficult to accurately predict. Occupants cause prediction inaccuracies by varying different factors, especially heating setpoints temperatures and heating patterns. Acting together, such occupant factors result in distributions - not single values - of heat-energy usage, even among similar homes. Datasets of heat-energy distributions can be found by building performance simulation using modern grey-box models. This study presents a methodology to simulate grey-box models of home heating through ranges of heating setpoints and patterns. An entire process to calibrate, validate and simulate at a large scale is described, and then demonstrated using case studies. Grey-box models, written in Modelica language, can conveniently simulate through large ranges of occupant factors. The case studies exploited this advantage of grey-box models to simulate empirical data on occupant factors. (For instance, empirical data found that home heating setpoints shifted before and after home energy retrofit.) In doing so, the datasets of simulation results enabled the exploration of home heat-energy usage with the normal and Weibull statistical distributions. Additionally, the heat-energy distributions of case-study homes were statistically tested, first for retrofit savings, second for equality to each other and third for equality to an official heat-energy estimate. Results demonstrate that home heat-energy usage, at a large scale, is best expressed as a Weibull distribution not normality. After home energy retrofit, heat-energy usage displays less variation (in general), less skewness, and thus becomes closer to normality. Occupant factors were found to vary home heat-energy usage into distinct distributions, even within similar homes. Therefore, in most case-study homes, heat-energy usage did not equal an official estimate. Finally, shallow retrofit of a modern home in Ireland fails to save heat-energy usage by most occupants. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12053-022-10038-9.
... However, the latter is only applicable in areas with low levels of ambient pollutants. 23,24 In cases where source control and natural ventilation are not effective control strategies, using range hoods over the stove and portable air cleaners near the receptor can be a good alternative to reduce PM 2.5 exposure. [25][26][27][28][29][30] In terms of control strategies, AQMs provide an opportunity to alert consumers about degrading levels of air quality in their homes and enable them to perform some of these mitigation strategies. ...
Full-text available
In this study, we deployed multiple low-cost air quality monitors (AQMs) to investigate the transport of kitchen-generated fine particulate matter (PM2.5) into the bedrooms of four homes of different sizes...
... The ventilation level is determined by measuring the amount of air change that occurs within one hour inside a room, also known as Air Changes Per Hour (ACH). Health risks may occur if the ventilation level is lower than 0.4 ACH (Wargocki, 2013). However, aside from ventilation level, air quality is also affected by the transmission of infectious particles, the potential for which is also determined by the route of movement from the source (Memarzadeh and Xu, 2012) and the size of the infectious particle (Faulkner et al., 2015). ...
Full-text available
Type 36 houses are built for people who have low income. Because of this, the buildings’ ventilation relies on natural airflow. One of the variables that affects natural ventilation is airflow. Airflow can affect the quality of indoor air, influencing the comfort and health of those within. This study aims to evaluate the designs of type 36 buildings from the perspective of the airflow through the unit. It uses computational fluid dynamics simulations to compare the pattern and velocity of airflow in each building design. There are six designs of type 36 house that have different layouts and placements of air vents. The results of the simulation and analysis show that rooms arranged in a way that allows for the placement of vents that were facing each other, even if they were in different rooms, generated continuous airflow without experiencing turbulence.
... The CO2 levels were used as a ventilation metric [60] (CO2 levels are examined in detail in the next section). The CO2 concentrations in the room were modelled using Equation (1). ...
Full-text available
Sustainable building design, such as the Passivhaus standard, seeks to minimise energy consumption, while improving indoor environmental comfort. Very few studies have studied the indoor air quality (IAQ) in Passivhaus homes outside of Europe. This paper presents the indoor particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon dioxide (CO2), and total volatile organic compounds (tVOC) measurements of the first residential Passivhaus in Latin America. It compares them to a standard home in Mexico City. Low-cost monitors were installed in the bedroom, living room, and kitchen spaces of both homes, to collect data at five-minute intervals for one year. The physical measurements from each home were also compared to the occupants' IAQ perceptions. The measurements demonstrated that the Passivhaus CO2 and tVOC annual average levels were 143.8 ppm and 81.47 μg/m 3 lower than the standard home. The PM2.5 in the Passivhaus was 11.13 μg/m 3 lower than the standard home and 5.75 μg/m 3 lower than outdoors. While the results presented here cannot be generalised, the results suggest that Passivhaus dwellings can provide better and healthier indoor air quality in Latin America. Further, large-scale studies should look at the indoor environmental conditions, energy performance, and dwelling design of Passivhaus dwellings in Latin America.
... Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play an important role in the process of assessing the IAQ. They negatively affect both the comfort and health of occupants [35,36]. The effects of VOCs in indoor spaces vary from sensory irritation at medium exposure levels to toxic effects at high exposure levels [37]. ...
Full-text available
Residents of nursing homes have been significantly affected by COVID-19 in Spain. The factors that have contributed to the vulnerability of this population are very diverse. In this study,physical agents, chemical pollutants, population density and different capacities of residences were analysed to understand their influence on the number of elderly people who have died in geriatric centres in different autonomous communities (AACCs) of Spain. A statistical analysis was carried out on the variables observed. The results show that many residences with a larger number of deaths were private, with some exceptions. Physical agents and pollutants were found to be determining factors, especially for the communities of Extremadura and Castilla–La Mancha, although the large number of factors involved makes this study complicated. The compromise between air quality and energy efficiency is of great importance, especially when human health is at stake.
Many issues have emerged more clearly than before in multi-storey residential buildings during quarantine and lockdown caused by the global pandemic COVID-19. Among these problems is the deterioration in people’s mental and physical health inside the home caused by quarantine and closure. This deterioration is due to inadequate passive ventilation, natural lighting, and the lack of green open spaces in and around traditional multi-storey residential buildings. Also, one of the most severe problems is the airborne infection transmission from a positive covid-19 person to others due to the lack of control in the entrance of buildings against an infected person. In this paper, we modified the shape of a traditional multi-storey residential building. Using Design-Builder and Autodesk CFD software, we create a simulation to compare the amount of natural ventilation and lighting before and after modifying the building’s shape. This work aims to increase the passive ventilation and daylight inside the building. Also, to achieve the biophilic concept to provide open spaces for each apartment to improve the mental and physical health of the residents. In addition, it protects the building users from infection with the virus. Through this study, we found that passive ventilation and daylight achieved more efficiency in the building that we have modified in its shape, which led to a 38% reduction in energy consumption. In summary, these findings suggest that by modifying the mass of the traditional multi-storey residential building with open green spaces provided for each apartment, the natural connection with the inhabitants of the building was sufficiently provided. Moreover, all this will significantly help improve residents’ mental and physical state, and it will also help prevent the spread of various diseases inside the homes.
Full-text available
The global COVID-19 outbreak has hit the world in the last two years. Indonesia itself recorded positive cases of COVID-19 of approximately 4 million cases as of September 15, 2021. In addition, the frequency of occurrence of natural disasters in Indonesia, which is relatively high every year, requires our collective attention. In early 2021, there have been several natural disasters, including floods in South Kalimantan, earthquakes in West Sulawesi, and others. If the impact of the natural disaster makes residents must do the evacuation, a proper shelter (evacuee camp) and prioritizes health protocols are needed. Therefore, this study discusses the design innovation of disaster response shelters in the form of smart folding and floating shelters designed for a shelter with a capacity of one family (4-5 people). This capacity limitation is to maintain health protocols and suppress the transmission of the Coronavirus in evacuation areas. Our designed shelter prepared in a compact form to facilitate evacuation mobility and can be implemented in all types of disasters with a folding and floating structure system (the shelter can float and be folded). The material used is light steel as the main structure and cork wall as a material that allows the shelter to float. We designed natural ventilation to regulate air circulation, integrated with an ultraviolet C (UVC) lamp. The UVC lamp is intended as a disinfectant against the Coronavirus. Thus, the application of natural ventilation and disinfection using UVC can provide a cleaner air supply. This air supply and circulation are shown in our simulation results using ANSYS Fluent. These results show that smart folding and floating shelter designs can be used for disaster mitigation.
In this paper different mechanical ventilation methods were analysed in a test room, having similar dimensions with a small office room. A series of measurements were performed with mixing, displacement and personalized isothermal ventilation having one or two occupants in the room. The main goal of this research was to investigate the air cleaning performance of different ventilation strategies in the breathing zone. The CO2 emission of involved persons was determined and it was shown that one person released 13.4 l/h CO2 while two persons released 23.63 l/h CO2. Taking into account the spread of viruses and the requirements related to separation of persons in public buildings, measurements were carried out with “open” working desk and with “screened” desk as well. Using the balance equation of pollutants, the equation which describes the CO2 concentration variation in the closed space was developed and used for calculations. Air flow visualization was done for different ventilation modes. The local ventilation effectiveness was determined for each ventilation mode based on the measured and calculated CO2 concentrations depending on the provided fresh air flow, air distribution and occupants number. In the case of screened desk the personalized ventilation shows the highest local effectiveness (1.6–2.7 in comparison with 0.6–1.4 in the case of mixing and displacement ventilation).
Full-text available
This paper is concerned with historical changes in domestic ventilation rates, relative humidity and the associated risk of house dust mite colonization. A controlled trial evaluated allergen and water vapour control measures on the level of house dust mite (HDM) Der p1 allergen and indoor humidity, concurrently with changes in lung function in 54 subjects who completed the protocol. Mechanical heat recovery ventilation units significantly reduced moisture content in the active group, while HDM allergen reservoirs in carpets and beds were reduced by circa 96%. Self reported health status confirmed a significant clinical improvement in the active group. The study can form the basis for assessing minimum winter ventilation rates that can suppress RH below the critical ambient equilibrium humidity of 60% and thus inhibit dust mite colonization and activity in temperate and maritime in‘ uenced climatic regions.
Full-text available
The LARES Housing and Health survey conducted in representative samples of eight European towns provides substantial data from 3,373 households about housing conditions and the health of 8,519 residents. We assessed the relation between residential thermal comfort, weather-tightness, ventilation, mould or dampness and some common diseases and symptoms. We observed that reporting bad health was significantly associated with temperature, weather-tightness and mould or dampness problems. Asthma was significantly linked with mould or dampness, temperature, and ventilation problems. Hypertension and cold/throat illness were associated with temperature, mould or dampness, and weather tightness problems in the dwellings. These results make it possible to recommend improvements in existing dwellings, in particular of the weather tightness accompanied by better information and verification of the ventilation systems. These simple and not too costly actions might have a beneficial impact not only on comfort but on health too, as well as for energy savings.
People spend a significant part of their life indoors mainly in the built environment (in public and residential buildings). In developed parts of the world, the proportion of time spent indoors can be as high as 80% to 90%. Many non-industrial buildings do not provide adequate conditions as regards indoor environmental quality especially indoor air quality. This is due to elevated exposures to air pollutants. These conditions reduce quality of life by increasing the risks for health problems that can, among others, result in disability to perform work. Significant societal costs are then generated including costs to individuals, building owners and employers. There are potentially considerable health and productivity benefits of improving indoor air quality in non-industrial buildings. Crude estimates suggest that 2 million healthy life years can be saved in Europe by avoiding exposures to air pollutants indoors in non-industrial buildings. Similar estimates have been made for the U.S. as regards exposures to air pollutants in residential buildings. The potential annual savings and productivity gains have been estimated to be as high as $168 billion in the U.S. (1997 estimate as no newer data are available). A saving of $400 per employee per year (2000 estimate) was estimated due to reduced absenteeism being the result of improving indoor air quality. In Europe, the annual productivity benefits were estimated to be at the level of ca. €330 per worker (2000 estimate as no newer data are available). Despite the obvious significance, the potential health and productivity benefits have not yet been integrated in the conventional economic calculations pertaining to building design and operation. Such integration would provide economic arguments for applying measures to reduce air pollution and thereby would support the arguments that arise from the public health perspective. The present article attempts to provide such arguments by summarizing the potential costs and economic benefits of improved indoor air quality.
For many years, the housing environment has been acknowledged as one of the main settings that affect human health. Living and housing conditions are the basis of many factors influencing residential health. Still, to date there is no commonly agreed upon definition of 'healthy housing', and there are still major gaps in the knowledge on how housing conditions may affect health. Epidemiological findings suggest strong associations between housing conditions and health effects. This paper explores the relevance of housing conditions as a key factor influencing mental health, sleep quality, indoor air, home safety, accessibility, obesity, mould growth, hygrothermal conditions and energy consumption, perception of crime, and residential quality.
Associations between environmental factors and work-related health conditions were assessed using regression techniques with environmental and health data for 2435 respondents in 80 office buildings included in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Health Hazard Evaluation program. The health conditions analyzed included two symptom groupings—multiple lower respiratory symptoms and multiple atopic symptoms—and the presence of asthma diagnosed after beginning work in the building. Four categories of environmental variables were included: heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system design; HVAC maintenance; building design; and building maintenance. Female gender and age over 40 years showed increased relative risks (RRs) for each health condition. In regression models adjusted for age and gender, RRs of multiple lower respiratory symptoms were increased for variables in the HVAC design and maintenance categories, with the highest RR for presence of debris inside the air intake [RR = 3.1, confidence interval (CI) = 1.8, 5.2] and for poor or no drainage from drain pans (RR = 3.0, CI = 1.7, 5.2). Elevated RRs of multiple atopic symptoms were found for variables in three of the four environmental categories, with the highest for presence of suspended ceiling panels (RR = 2.3, CI = 1.0, 5.5). The RR of asthma was highest if recent renovation with new drywall had been performed (RR = 2.5, CI = 1.4, 4.5). These data are from office spaces about which there was some level of occupant concern, and thus it may not be appropriate to use them to estimate the magnitude and distribution of symptoms found in all office spaces within U.S. buildings. Furthermore, the high degree of correlation among environmental variables makes it difficult to disentangle which are the most important predictors of work-related health conditions. The analysis is useful, however, for determining factors that may be associated with development of health conditions in the office environment and which might be considered in any building plan to reduce indoor air-related symptoms.
The paper highlights some of the key features of the design procedures in ASHRAE Standard 62 (Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality) and summarizes the status of the related review process. The Standard contains design procedures and guidelines for ventilation rates in 'all indoor or enclosed spaces that people may occupy, except where other applicable standards and requirements dictate larger amounts of ventilation than this standard.' It is the basis for ventilation requirements in many codes for commercial, institutional, and residential buildings in North America. The Standard is reviewed every 5 years or less, and updated as needed to incorporate new information or improve its usefulness to building designers and code officials.
In 1993, Pandian, Ott, and Behar published statistical summaries of residential air exchange rates in the perfluorocarbon tracer (PFT) data base as a function of geographic region, season, and number of home levels. Unfortunately, after the paper was published, some readers noticed discrepancies in the air exchange rates representing one region, the southwestern United States. The present paper answers the following questions: (1) What is the nature of errors in the PFT data base? (2) What was the likely cause of errors in the PFT data base? and (3) What are the statistics of the correct data from the PFT data base? Our objective, in this paper is to correct the errors in the earlier paper by presenting the revised summary statistics and to make others aware of the data coding problems in the original diskettes containing the Versar PFT data base. These overall statistics are useful for exposure assessors and for characterizing residential air exchange rates across the nation.
Epidemiologic research into the causes of non-specific symptoms among office workers has produced a variety of conflicting findings which are difficult to synthesize. This paper first discusses methodologic issues important in the interpretation of epidemiologic studies, and then reviews the findings of 32 studies of 37 factors potentially related to office worker symptoms. Among environmental factors assessed, there were generally consistent findings associating increased symptoms with air-conditioning, carpets, more workers in a space, VDT use, and ventilation rates at or below 10 liters/second/person. Studies with particularly strong designs found decreased symptoms associated with low ventilation rate, short-term humidification, negative ionization, and improved office cleaning, although studies reviewed showed little consistency of findings for humidification and ionization. Relatively strong studies associated high temperature and low relative humidity with increased symptoms, whereas less strong studies were not consistent. Among personal factors assessed, there were generally consistent findings associating increased symptoms with female gender, job stress/dissatisfaction, and allergies/asthma. For other environmental or personal factors assessed, findings were too inconsistent or sparse for current interpretation, and there were no findings from strong studies. Overall evidence suggested that work related symptoms among office workers were relatively common, and that some of these symptoms represented preventable physiologic effects of environmental exposures or conditions. Future research on this problem should include blind experimental and case-control studies, using improved measurements of both environmental exposures and health outcomes
Abstract Adjustment of ventilation rates in buildings is widely practised, both to provide good air quality on a proactive basis and to mitigate air quality problems associated with occupant complaints. However, both cross-sectional and experimental epidemiological studies have reported mixed results and have for the most part failed to establish definitive relationships between ventilation rates and symptom prevalence or dissatisfaction with air quality. The difficulties involved in establishing such relationships may be due to a variety of confounding factors which include limitations in study design and interaction effects; difficulties in controlling ventilation rates in experimental studies; inadequate mixing of supply air in occupied spaces; high source strengths for some contaminants; dynamic interactions between sources and ventilation rates that result in increased contaminant emissions; contaminant dose-response sensory effects which are log-linear; potential contaminant generation within ventilation systems themselves; and multifactorial genesis of sick building symptoms. There is limited evidence to suggest that ventilation rate increases up to 10 L/s person may be effective in reducing symptom prevalence and occupant dissatisfaction with air quality and that higher ventilation rates are not effective. Because of complex relationships between ventilation rates, contaminant levels, and building-related health complaints/dissatisfaction with air quality, the use of ventilation as a mitigation measure for air quality problems should be tempered with an understanding of factors which may limit its effectiveness.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the occurrence of symptoms and the perception of poor indoor air quality among the occupants of houses and apartments with different ventilation systems. The study population consisted of the 473 occupants of 242 dwellings in the Helsinki metropolitan area who responded to a self-administered questionnaire (response rate 93.1%) after a two-week period of indoor air quality measurements. The symptoms of interest were those often related to poor indoor air quality including dryness or itching of the skin; dryness, irritation or itching of the eyes; nasal congestion (“blocked nose”) nasal dry-ness; nasal discharge (“runny nose”); sneezing; cough; breathlessness; headache or migraine; and lethargy, weakness or nausea. Perception of coldness; warm-ness; draught; dryness; stuffiness; and sufficiency of air exchange was also requested. The age-standardized period prevalences of the symptoms and complaints were systematically more common among the occupants of the apartments than those of the houses. The occupants of the houses with natural ventilation seemed to have more symptoms and complaints than those with balanced ventilation. However, in the apartments with balanced ventilation the occupants reported, in general, more symptoms and complaints than those with natural ventilation.