Contemporary India is governed, as a matter of law, by its constitution, and therefore represents itself as a democracy, notwithstanding resurgent ideological visions of "cultural nationalism" emphasizing Hinduism as a national religion, i.e., "Hindutva." However, India continues to experience the onus of its classical and colonial history, as the caste structure of its society remains firmly intact. Caste is represented to be an expression of both Hindu orthodoxy (correct belief) and orthopraxis (correct conduct), both of which arise from the "Hindu scriptures," including here the written tradition of Vedas and Upanishads (shruti, "what is heard") and the oral tradition of Bhagavad Gita, Mahabharata, and Ramayana (smriti, "what is remembered"). This tradition provides a "world-image" and a "theodicy"/"cosmodicy" (justification of "God") in concepts of dharma (moral duty), karma (reward and suffering), samsara (rebirth), and moksha (liberation from the cycle of rebirth). Where egalitarianism is championed in Western cultural metaphysics, communitarianism with a structured hierarchy is considered central to a South Asian cultural metaphysics, as represented, e.g., by Hinduism/Brahmanism. At issue for some who have been ethically critical of the caste system, such as sociologist Max Weber and Indian intellectual B.R. Ambedkar, is the cultural metaphysics (represented by the "Hindu scriptures") that sustains ritualistic adherence to caste, with its persistent discrimination and inequality. There are others (e.g., Sri Lankans Adam L. Barborich and Asantha U. Attanayake) who reject moral critique arising in the West, on the grounds that Western ethical theories are merely "ideological," i.e., they advance "Orientalist" or Protestant-Christian perspectives that are in fact only historically contingent, thus neither necessary nor universalist, and that in fact serve the entirely political interests of Western global hegemony. Such "ethical" perspectives, it has been argued, are advanced ideologically, thus in a way that seeks to "decontest" the basic concepts and meanings central to ethical theories or religious traditions. Yet, there remains the question whether Hinduism/Brahmanism is to be evaluated as an "incoherent" and "ethically irrational" framework of beliefs and practices; whether its caste structure is to be judged as a social practice that is horrendous, inexcusable, and abysmal in the sense of lacking rational legitimation; and, therefore, should remain contested in contemporary moral discourse. This essay engages this question and argues for continued ethical contestation of the caste structure of contemporary Indian society.