Content uploaded by Alain Deloire
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Alain Deloire on Feb 06, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
WineLand · January · 2011
WynLand · Januarie · 2011 81
Alain Deloire
The concept of berry sugar loading
Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Deloire@sun.ac.za Alain Deloire
Sugar loading – Introduction
Sugar loading can be dened as the evolution of the quantity
of sugar per berry, expressed as mg per berry, from véraison
onwards. Véraison corresponds to the onset of fruit maturation.
In the grapevine, this fruit maturation starts with an abrupt
softening of the berry (within 24 hours), which then becomes
transparent. This softening goes hand in hand with sugars being
actively introduced into the berry (sucrose rapidly hydrolysed
into hexoses: glucose and fructose). In red and black cultivars,
véraison is characterised, after softening, by skin colouring as a
result of the biosynthesis of anthocyanins.
The evolution of sugar loading in grape berries gives an
indication of the ripening process from a new perspective
and is a novel approach to identifying practical indicators for
obtaining particular styles of grapes and wine. Sugar loading
may also provide information on ripening kinetics and enables
the principal phases of ripening to be distinguished (McCarthy &
Coombe, 1999; Wang et al., 2003a & b; Hunter & Deloire, 2005).
Furthermore, this information provides a greater understanding
of how grape quality develops in the vineyard.
Sugar loading calculation
Phloem sugar transport, principally to the esh cells, has been
characterised in studies on plant-to-berry sugar loading, and
phloem sugar unloading, notably by the peripheral vascular
system of the berry (Ollat & Gaudillère, 1996; Fillon, 1997; Hunter
& Ruffner, 2001; Wang et al., 2003a). Phloem sugar unloading
into cell vacuoles occurs mainly via an apoplastic mechanism,
which requires the intervention of hexose transporters (Agoerges
et al., 1995; Terrier et al., 2005). From above-mentioned
studies, it can be concluded that sugar loading into the berry,
coupled with the dynamics of sugar concentration changes,
may be considered a useful indicator of grape quality. It takes
into account the evolution of the sugar level per berry (mg per
berry) and therefore enables the kinetics of sugar concentration
changes to be monitored.
Kinetic monitoring of the quantity of sugar per berry may be
considered as a method of measuring the plant’s physiological
functioning (Hunter & Deloire, 2005; Deloire et al., 2004; Wang
et al., 2003b; Carbonneau & Deloire, 2001; Carbonneau et
al., 1998) and in particular, photosynthesis, which is a reliable
indicator of temperatures to which the vine is subjected under
given conditions over a specic time period and grapevine water
status.
Active sugar loading is calculated on the basis of berry volume
(or berry fresh mass) and sugar concentration (McCarthy &
Coombe, 1999; Brenon et al., 2005; Hunter & Deloire, 2005).
Example of sugar loading calculation
For a berry with a ripeness level of 25 °brix:
Convert 25 °brix to in probable alcohol:1.
25 x 0.59 = 14.75° in probable alcohol, where 0.59 is ·
the coefcient used for yeast activity to convert brix in
probable alcohol (this coefcient as to be adapted to
the probable alcohol level).
Determine mg of sugar per ml probable alcohol:2.
To obtain 1° probable alcohol, 17 g/L of sugar is required.
14.75° x 17 g/L = 250.75 g/L, which is equivalent to ·
250 mg of sugar per ml (in this example).
Calculate quantity of sugar per berry:3.
In addition to measuring °brix, the volume of a berry (or
berry fresh mass thereof) should also be measured so
that the quantity of sugar per berry can be calculated.
Approximately 50 berries should be used to determine
berry fresh mass so that the single berry fresh mass is an
average of a berry population.
250 mg x volume of a berry (or the berry fresh mass ·
thereof, because for many varieties there is a linear
correlation between berry volume and fresh mass).
It should be taken into consideration that this calculation is
only an approximation of sugar loading into berries. This is due
to a number of reasons; amongst others seed volume, sugar
distribution between skin and pulp. Despite the calculation being
an approximation, with associated shortcomings, it nevertheless
is a useful indicator and the use thereof is becoming increasingly
more common.
Profiles of sugar loading
It is possible to distinguish three principal sugar loading pro-
les:
Continual and rapid loading1.
This type of sugar loading occurs from véraison and is related
to the active functioning of carbon production sources (leaves)
which supply plant sinks (berries, secondary shoots etc.) du-
ring their growth phases. It is therefore often associated with
signicant vegetative growth and greater berry volume. Phenolic
maturity is not affected. This type of loading is often considered
benecial for the production of rosé, fresh fruit red wines, or
pleasant aromatic white wines.
Slow sugar loading – inhibition of ripening2.
Low sugar content per berry, associated with a slow loading
rate, can be considered to “blocked” ripening and this could
be indicative of an imbalance in the vine. If major physiological
problems, such as mineral deciencies, viral diseases etc., are
WineLand · January · 2011
82
WynLand · Januarie · 2011
excluded, blocked ripening can often be related to excessive
water decit (Wang et al., 2003b) or to an excessive crop load
in relation to the exposed leaf surface (Carbonneau & Deloire,
2001).
In all grape varieties, this type of situation is far from ideal in
terms of the standard vinication practices in white and dry red
wine production. Furthermore, in relation to red and black gra-
pes, this situation may be associated with blocked technologi-
cal and phenolic maturities. Ultimately, it may be necessary to
adapt the fermentation procedure to this type of grape, with
thermo vinication and short macerations with limited extraction
being the preferred options.
Sugar loading presenting a plateau phase3.
Vines showing this tendency present a phase of active sugar
ripening ripeness overripeness
sugar per berry (mg/berry)
•The plateau is reached when the speed
of sugar loading is 3 mg/berry/day.
The Brix value at the beginning of the plateau
is an important criteria.
day « 0 »
Slope = the speed
of sugar loading
(mg/berry/day)
Duration of the plateau
(number of days after day «0»)
= allows to determine the level
of ripeness from fresh to mature fruit
for the red cultivars.
ripening ripeness overripeness
sugar per berry (mg/berry)
•The plateau is reached when the speed
of sugar loading is 3 mg/berry/day.
The Brix value at the beginning of the plateau
is an important criteria.
day « 0 »
Slope = the speed
of sugar loading
(mg/berry/day)
Duration of the plateau
(number of days after day «0»)
= allows to determine the level
of ripeness from fresh to mature fruit
for the red cultivars.
FIGURE 1. Berry sugar loading concept. This theoretical curve is based on data obtained over five years using at least 20 different grape varieties in different countries, principally
France, Spain, Argentina and Chile. This curve has been recently calibrated for some South African viticulture areas and cultivars (in collaboration with Distell).
loading in the berry (ripening), followed by a plateau represent-
ing a cessation of sugar loading and corresponding to matu-
rity (Hunter & Deloire, 2005; Deloire et al., 2005a & b). In some
cases, there is a third phase corresponding to a possible de-
crease of the quantity of sugar per berry (over ripening). To date
a probable explanation for the occurrence of this phase has not
been identied.
Theoretical berry sugar loading curves (evolution of berry sugar
content over time) are presented in Fig. 1. These curves are
based on data obtained over ve years using at least 20 differ-
ent grape varieties in mainly France, Spain, Argentina, Chile and
recently in South Africa.
The implications of this curve in terms of dening the nished
wine is important: depending on whether grapes are harvested
in the early, mid or later stages of the plateau phase, the wine
FIGURE 2. The Berry Aromatic Sequence (B.A.S.): Sugar loading and style of wine. Example of relationships between the berry sugar loading curve and the possible related style
of wine, for Cabernet-Sauvignon. After “day 0”, three successive main periods have been determined: a fresh fruit period, a “neutral” period and a mature fruit period. In terms of
harvesting dates, these periods have been determined according to the number of days after “day 0”, which corresponds to the sugar loading “plateau”, and not directly to a calendar
date. This introduces the concept of “physiological clock”.
WineLand · January · 2011
WynLand · Januarie · 2011 83
will be characterised by fresh fruit, neutral-spicy or mature fruit
avours, respectively.
The concept of Berry Aromatic Sequence (B.A.S.)
The above curve demonstrates that selecting a harvesting date
according to the quantity of sugar per berry in conjunction with
other indicators (titratable acidity, malic and tartaric acids, pH,
berry volume, berry tasting, tannins, anthocyanins, etc.) ena-
bles different styles of wine to be produced. Hence, for a ba-
lanced red wine, complete ripeness will be achieved between
one and ve weeks after the cessation of sugar loading (Fig.
2). Once the plateau phase of berry sugar loading has been
reached, the evolution of ripening will depend on other factors
such as cultivar, bunch microclimate, the leaf/fruit balance, the
ratio of primary to secondary shoots and the climate mainly du-
ring berry ripening (maximum temperature, night-time coolness,
sea-breeze, wind-speed, late season rains, and various factors
which are quantiable) (Bonnardot et al., 2005; Carey, 2001;
Hunter & Bonnardot, 2002).
It should be noted that the plateau phase in sugar loading may
be reached at different sugar concentrations (brix), depending
on the cultivar and environmental conditions. A red cultivar, with
a very high sugar concentration (brix) when the maturity plateau
is reached, will not always be desirable for the production of
certain types and/or styles of wine (Deloire et al., 2008).
Monitoring ripening with various indicators, coupled with appro-
priate analytical data measurements such as berry fresh mass
or volume, brix, sugar loading, evolution of titrable acidity, malic
acid tartaric acid, pH, colour evolution, anthocyanins, tannins,
berry tasting, etc.) enable decision-makers to determine the
optimum harvesting date, a major consideration in determining
grape quality. Such monitoring provides a greater understand-
ing of vine morphological and physiological parameters dur-
ing ripening and therefore vineyard practices can be adapted
to production objectives. There are, in most vineyards, several
potential optimal harvesting dates and optimal ripening levels
according to the desired style of wine. The wine is therefore cre-
ated in the vineyard!
As the world becomes more technologically advanced, more
advanced technology is being developed to monitor berry rip-
ening. This technology is rapidly being adopted by large estates
and co-operatives to enhance their marketing edge.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Vivelys and Nicolas Bernard (Montpellier,
France) for providing the data on berry sugar loading. Many
thanks as well to Dr Mary Kelly (Montpellier 1, France) and to
Carolyn Howell (ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij) for helping with the
English translation.
References
Ageorges, A., Fillon, L., Romieu, C. & Delrot, S. 1995. Molecular identi-
cation of cDNA clones from grape berries with close homology to the
hexose carrier. Abstract 10th International Workshop Plant Membrane
Biology, Regensburg, 6 - 11 August.
Bonnardot, V., Planchon, O., Cautenet, S., 2005. Sea-breeze devel-
opment under an offshore synoptic wind in the South-Western Cape
and implications for the Stellenbosch wine-producing area. Theo. Appl.
Clim. Vol. 81, No. 3 - 4, 203 - 218.
Brenon, E., Bernard, N., Zebic, O. & Deloire, A., 2005. Grape maturity:
Proposal for a method using the berry volume as indicator. Revue des
œnologues 117, 1 - 3.
Carbonneau, A., Champagnol, F., Deloire, A. & Sevila, F., 1998. Harvest
and grape quality. In: C. Flanzy. Œnologie. Fondements scientiques et
technologiques, pp. 647 - 668.
Carbonneau, A. & Deloire, A., 2001. Plant organization based on source-
sink relationship: new nding on developmental, biochemical and mo-
lecular responses to environment. In: Molecular Biology & Biotechnology
of Grapevine. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 263 - 280.
Carey, V.A., 2001. Spatial characterization of natural terroir units for viti-
culture in the Bottelaryberg-Simonsberg-Helderberg wine-growing area.
M.Sc. Thesis, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland
(Stellenbosch), South Africa.
Deloire, A., Carbonneau, A., Wang, Z.P. & Ojeda, H., 2004. Vine and
water: a short review. J. Int. Sci. Vigne et Vin. 38, 1, 1 - 13.
Deloire, A, Zebic, O., Bernard, N., Brenon, E. & Hunter, J.J., 2005a.
Inuence of grapevine water status on the style of wine. Revue Française
d’œnologie 215, 11 - 15.
Deloire, A., Ojeda, H., Zebic, O., Bernard, N., Hunter, J.J. & Carbonneau,
A., 2005b. Inuence of grapevine water status on the style of wine. Le
Progrès Agricole et Viticole 122, 21, 455 - 462.
Deloire, A., Kelly, M., Bernard, N., 2008. Managing harvest potential:
Navigating between terroir and the market. 31st conference of the
South African Society for Enology and Viticulture. Somerset West, 11
- 14 November.
Fillon, L., 1997. Aspects physiologiques, cytologiques et moléculaires
des ux de glucides au cours de la maturation de la baie de raisin (Vitis
vinifera L.). Thèse, Université de Poitiers, France, p. 136.
Hunter, J.J. & Deloire, A., 2005. Relationship between sugar loading
and berry size of ripening Syrah/R99 grapes as affected by grapevine
water status. Gesco XIVéme journées du groupe européen d’étude des
systèmes de conduite de la vigne, Geisenheim, Allemagne, 23 - 27
Août, 127 - 133.
Hunter J.J. & Bonnardot V., 2002. Climatic requirements for optimal
physiological processes: A factor in viticultural zoning. In: Proc. 4th
International Symposium on Viticultural Zoning, 17 - 20 June 2002,
Avignon, France, p.553 - 565.
Hunter, J.J. & Ruffner, H.P., 2001. Assimilate transport in grapevines
– effect of phloem disruption. Aus. J. Grape & Wine Research 7, 118
- 126.
McCarthy, M.G. & Coombe, B.G., 1999. Is weight loss in ripening grape
berries cv. Shiraz caused by impeded phloem transport. Aus. J. Grape
& Wine Research 5, 17 - 21.
Ollat, N. & Gaudillère, J.P., 1996. Investigation of assimilates import
mechanisms in berries of Vitis vinifera var. Cabernet-Sauvignon. Acta
Horticulturae 427, 141 - 149.
Terrier, N., Glissant, D., Grimplet, J., Barrieu, F., Abbal, P., Couture, C.,
Ageorges, A., Atanassova, R., Leon, C., Renaudon, J.P., Dédaldéchamp,
F., Romieu, C., Delrot, S. & Hamdi, S., 2005. Isogene specic oligo ar-
rays reveal multifaceted changes in gene expression during grape berry
(Vitis vinifera L.) development. Planta 222, 5, 832 - 847.
Wang, Z.P., Deloire, A., Carbonneau, A., Federspiel, B. & Lopez, F.,
2003a. An in vivo experimental system to study sugar phloem unload-
ing in ripening grapes berries during water deciency stress. Annals of
Botany 92, 523 - 528.
Wang, Z.P., Deloire, A., Carbonneau, A., Federspiel, B. & Lopez., 2003b.
Study of sugar phloem unloading in ripening grape berries under water
stress conditions. J. Int. Sci. Vigne et Vin. 37, 4, 213 - 222.