ArticlePDF Available

Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the Americas? A Critical Re-Evaluation

Authors:
PERSPECTIVE
Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate
Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the
Americas? A Critical Re-Evaluation
Jennifer A. Raff
University of Kansas, Lawrence
Deborah A. Bolnick
University of Texas, Austin
It might seem strange for an article to focus largely on the
history of a single mitochondrial haplogroup in an era
when complete genome sequencing is becoming more
common. But as recent publications and film documen-
taries have shown (Meldrum 2009; Oppenheimer et al.
2014; Smoot et al. 2010; Stanford and Bradley 2012),
there is still considerable confusion about what the struc-
ture of mitochondrial genetic diversity in the Americas
means for Native American population history.
Specifically, there are persistent claims that the presence
of mitochondrial haplogroup X2a in Native American
populations is evidence for ancient trans-Atlantic gene
flow from Europe or the Middle East into North
America (Meldrum 2009; Oppenheimer et al. 2014;
Smoot et al. 2010; Stanford and Bradley 2012). If true,
this genetic evidence would lend considerable support to
the Solutrean hypothesis, which suggests that the North
American Clovis culture (13,30012,800 cal yr BP) is
directly descended from the Solutrean culture of south-
western Europe (23,50018,000 cal yr BP). The current
iteration of the Solutrean hypothesis was developed by
Bruce Bradley and Dennis Stanford (Bradley and
Stanford 2004; Stanford and Bradley 2012; see Abbott
1877, Greenman 1963 and Hibben 1941 for previous iter-
ations of the hypothesis), and it has been heavily critiqued
by many archaeologists (Eren et al. 2013, 2015; OBrien
et al. 2014; Philips 2014; Sellet 1998; Straus et al. 2005).
The idea that haplogroup X2a is derived from an
ancient trans-Atlantic migration to the Americas has
been repeatedly considered and rejected by
anthropological geneticists over the last two decades
(Brown et al. 1998; Fagundes et al. 2008; Reidla
et al. 2003; Smith et al. 1999, 2005). However, we
revisit it here because it continues to be discussed
and because recently published genomic data from
ancient and contemporary North Americans help
clarify the population history of North America and
the likely history of this haplogroup.
1. The current model
Several decades of studies analyzing classical genetic
markers, DNA sequences from single loci, and, very
recently, genome wide variants have cumulatively
shown that all Native Americans derive ancestry
from a fairly small founder population that likely occu-
pied Beringia during the Last Glacial Maximum
(LGM; 28,000 and 18,000 cal yr BP) (reviewed in
Hoffecker et al. 2014; Kemp and Schurr 2010; Raff
and Bolnick 2014). There is still a great deal that is
unknown about this founder population, but current
genetic evidence shows that it was descended from
peoples in eastern Siberia who were related to the
ancestors of both contemporary East Asians and con-
temporary West Eurasians (Kemp and Schurr 2010;
ORourke and Raff 2010; Raghavan et al. 2014b).
Some Native Americans also share ancestry with con-
temporary Austro-Melanesians, although it is debated
whether these affinities reflect (a) gene flow from the
Asian ancestors of Austro-Melanesians into Beringia
before people moved into the Americas (Skoglund
et al. 2015), or (b) gene flow after the founder popu-
lation had entered and dispersed through the
Americas (Raghavan et al. 2015). Either way, this
founder population likely inhabited northeastern
Siberia (Madsen 2015) or Beringia (Hoffecker et al.
2014) for an extended period of time (700015,000
years), possibly in isolated refugia (Hoffecker et al.
2014; Kitchen et al. 2008; Mulligan et al. 2008;
Raghavan et al. 2015). During that time, a number
of genetic variants evolved through mutation and
genetic drift, and many of those variants are found
only (or primarily) in the Americas today (Tamm
et al. 2007).
Correspondence to: Jennifer Raff. Email: jennifer.raff@ku.edu
©2015W.S.Maney&SonLtd
and the Center for the Study of the First Americans
DOI 10.1179/2055556315Z.00000000040 PaleoAmerica 2015 VOL. 1NO. 4297
The precise history of migration out of Siberia/
Beringia following the LGM is currently the focus of
active research and debate in anthropological genetics,
archaeology, and geology. It is clear that people
reached Monte Verde in Chile by 14,600 cal yr BP
via a coastal route (Dillehay et al. 2008). By
13,000 cal yr BP, descendants of the Beringian
founder population had differentiated into two major
genetic groups (clades) in the Americas one con-
taining individuals from both North and South
America (including the 12,600 cal yr BP Anzick-1
infant from Montana and the 86908400 cal yr BP
Kennewick Man from Washington), and one restricted
to North America (Raghavan et al. 2015). It has also
been suggested based on mitochondrial DNA that
some individuals from the ancestral Siberian/
Beringian population moved into the Americas via a
second interior route when an ice-free corridor
opened between the Cordilleran and Laurentide ice
sheets, after 13,500 cal yr BP (Perego et al. 2009).
This migration might help account for the observed
genetic structure in North and South America, but
more genomic data from North American populations
is needed to test this hypothesis (Achilli et al. 2013;
Raghavan et al. 2015). Additional population move-
ments from Siberia, including migrations at approxi-
mately 4000 cal yr BP and 1000800 cal yr BP, also
contributed to the contemporary gene pool
in northern North America (Raff et al. 2015;
Raghavan et al. 2014b; Reich et al. 2012). Other
regions of the Americas saw more localized migration,
gene flow, and genetic drift over the millennia, with the
region-specific genetic structure of the Americas
largely in place by 4000 cal yr BP (Raff et al. 2011).
However, it is important to remember that the compo-
sition of these regional Native American gene pools
may have been dramatically reshaped by post-1492
contact with Europeans, which brought warfare,
disease, enslavement, removals and relocations, and
extensive admixture (Bolnick et al. 2006; Crawford
1998; Dobyns 1983; Livi-Bacci 2006; Malhi et al.
2008; Reich et al. 2012; Smith 1987; Ubelaker 2006;
Zlojutro et al. 2009). Thus, contemporary Native
American populations are genetically diverse, deriving
varying proportions of their ancestry from ancient
Siberia/Beringia, Europe, Asia, Africa, and elsewhere
(Bolnick et al. 2006; Hunley and Healy 2011; Moreno-
Estrada et al. 2013; Reich et al. 2012; Smith et al.
2014; Verdu et al. 2014; Zegura et al. 2004).
A small number of scholars contend that in addition
to having ancient Beringian ancestry, North American
populations also derived some genetic ancestry from a
trans-Atlantic migration in prehistoric times.
Proponents of the Solutrean hypothesis suggest that a
trans-Atlantic migration brought individuals inhab-
iting southwestern Europe between 23,500 and
18,000 cal yr BP to the Americas (Oppenheimer et al.
2014; Stanford and Bradley 2012), while others have
proposed a trans-Atlantic migration of ancient
Hebrews from the Middle East a few thousand years
ago (Meldrum 2009; Smoot et al. 2010). For the sake
of clarity and brevity, we focus our discussion here on
the validity of the two main lines of evidence presented
as supporting an ancient trans-Atlantic migration: the
presence of mitochondrial haplogroup X2a on the
North American continent and a signal of West
Eurasian ancestrywithin Native American genomes.
2. Haplogroup X2a
X2a (and the related, rare haplogroup X2g) is a
uniquely North American haplogroup, found at the
highest frequencies in Great Lakes populations and
at lower frequencies in the Plains and Pacific
Northwest. It appears to be completely absent in
populations from Central and South America
(Perego et al. 2009). Its presence in pre-European
contact skeletal remains confirms that it was not the
result of post-1492 admixture (Bolnick and Smith
2007; Malhi and Smith 2002; Rasmussen et al. 2015).
However, unlike the other American mitochondrial
haplogroups (AD), which have clear parental haplo-
types persisting in contemporary Siberian populations,
there is no clear record of the evolutionary history of
X2a in any population (Fernandes et al. 2012;
Reidla et al. 2003). X2asgrand-parentalhap-
logroup, X2, is found throughout, at low levels today
throughout much of the world, including in the Near
East (where X is more common and therefore
thought to have initially evolved), South Caucasus,
Europe, Siberia, Central Asia, and North Africa
(Reidla et al. 2003). It is important to note that
while the Altai people in southern Siberia exhibit X2
(Derenko et al. 2001), their lineages are not ancestral
to those of North Americans, and the presence of
X2 there today appears to be the result of recent
gene flow from the west (Reidla et al. 2003).
Thus, the intermediate lineages linking X2 and X2a
appear to have been lost in contemporary populations,
or are so rare that they have not yet been well studied.
We might expect to find them in ancient populations,
but our temporal and spatial coverage of ancient
populations is still quite sparse.
Despite or perhaps because of this gap in the
phylogeographic record for haplogroup X2, the pres-
ence of X2a in North America has been cited as evi-
dence for two different trans-Atlantic migrations
before European contact. First, Meldrum (2009) and
Smoot et al. (2010) suggested that X2a is the result of
an ancient Hebrew migration from the Middle East to
North America approximately 2500 cal yr BP. This
hypothesis is undermined, though, by four key findings:
X2a is not found in the Middle East, none of the X2
Raff and Bolnick Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the Americas?
PaleoAmerica 2015 VOL. 1NO. 4298
lineages present in the Middle East are immediately
ancestral to X2a, the date of coalescence for X2a
(14,20017,000 cal yr BP) significantly precedes the
hypothesized migration from the Middle East (Perego
et al. 2009), and haplogroup X2a was present in
North America far earlier than the hypothesized
Hebrew migration, having been found in the
86908400 cal yr BP Kennewick Man remains from
Washington state (Rasmussen et al. 2015). Thus, X2a
does not provide any evidence for an ancient Hebrew
migration from the Middle East to North America.
Second, Stanford and Bradley (2012) and
Oppenheimer et al. (2014) have hypothesized that hap-
logroup X2a was brought to North America via a
Pleistocene migration of Solutreans from western
Europe. Stanford and Bradley (2012) specifically cite
the high frequency of haplogroup X2 in the Orkney
Islands near Scotland (in 7.24% of the sampled individ-
uals; Helgason et al. 2001) as supporting the trans-
Atlantic migration of X2a. Madsen (2015) also notes
that it is interesting that a modern population with
one of the highest percentages of the X2 clade, higher
even than Native American populations, is found in
the Orkney Islands off the coast of Scotland(Madsen
2015, 213). However, the X2 haplotypes found in the
Orkney Islands was not ancestral to X2a, so this particu-
lar observation is irrelevant to the genetic prehistory of
the Americas. We therefore focus instead on Stanford
and Bradleys (2012) and Oppenheimer et al.s(2014)
other arguments in support of the idea that X2a
derives from a Solutrean migration.
They base this hypothesis on two main lines of
reasoning: (1) lineages ancestral to X2a have not been
found in Siberia, in contrast to the other American hap-
logroups, and (2) the phylogeographic distribution of
X2a in North America places the oldest and deepest
X2a branch ancestryin northeast Canada, supporting
an ultimately eastern introduction of X2a and X2g to
the Americas consistent with an additional trans-
Atlantic migration suggested by archaeological evi-
dence(Stanford and Bradley 2012, 763).
First, it seems to us a very large leap to go from the
observation that haplogroup X2as ancestors have not
been observed in Siberia to the conclusion that the
Solutrean hypothesis offers the only credible route-
explanation for the unique, substantial presence of
West Eurasian-derived X2g and X2a in the Great
Lakes region of north-east America, and their anti-
quity(Oppenheimer et al. 2014, 769). Although
X2as ancestor (X2) is thought to have evolved in the
Near East ( part of West Eurasia), characterizing
X2a as a West Eurasianhaplogroup is inaccurate
because X2a is found only in people with indigenous
North American ancestry. Associating X2a with
West Eurasiais like saying Solutreans evolved in
Africa: each statement refers to a location where the
ancestral population is thought to have lived long
ago, but that location is not relevant to the question
under consideration. In particular, because X2 dis-
persed from the Near East and became widely distrib-
uted throughout the world, its descendent lineage X2a
need not have evolved in the same place.
To differentiate between a Solutrean and Beringian
source for X2a, one must look instead at the phylogeo-
graphy of the most recent ancestors of X2a (Figure 1).
X2aj is the clade that unites X2a and its nearest sister
clade, X2j (Fernandes et al. 2012; Reidla et al. 2003).
The geographic distribution of X2aj haplotypes
especially those with some of the defining mutations
for X2a (indicating that they belong to the lineage
that led to X2a) would be informative to this ques-
tion, but no contemporary or ancient individuals
belonging to these lineages have been identified, with
the possible exception of one individual from Iran
with the X2aj defining transition at mitochondrial
nucleotide position 12397. However, because this tran-
sition has been observed in other haplogroups and is
known to occur recurrently, it is unclear if this
Iranian individual belongs to the X2aj lineage or
not (Reidla et al. 2003). X2as sister clade, X2j, is
also extremely rare, being found in just a few contem-
porary individuals from Iran and Egypt (Fernandes
et al. 2012). It is possible that the common ancestor
of X2a and X2j originated there, but without identify-
ing more individuals bearing X2j or X2aj lineages,
any inferences about the geographic origins of X2aj
or X2a are very tenuous.
Thus, at this time, there is simply no evidence that X2a
evolved in the Near East, Europe, or anywhere in West
Eurasia. Stanford and Bradley (2012) and
Oppenheimer et al. (2014) argue that the absence of evi-
dence for X2a in West Eurasia is not evidence of absence,
but of course, the same holds for Siberia. There is no
compelling reason to think that X2a is more likely to
have come from Europe than Siberia.
Where does this leave us? Until we have better geo-
graphic sampling of ancient DNA from the relevant
time periods, the only way we can deduce anything
about X2as history is by studying it within North
America or by making inferences based on the geo-
graphic distribution of other haplogroups or the pat-
terns at other genetic loci. This indirect approach has
been used in numerous studies, which have looked at
the geographic distribution of X2a within North
America to try to infer a migration route, compared
the coalescence date of X2a to that of other founder
haplogroups in the Americas, and examined the demo-
graphic histories of each haplogroup to see if they
underwent similar evolutionary pressures (such as
population bottlenecks and expansions) (Achilli
et al. 2008; Fagundes et al. 2008; Kashani et al.
2012; Perego et al. 2009; Smith et al. 1999, 2005;
Raff and Bolnick Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the Americas?
PaleoAmerica 2015 VOL. 1NO. 4299
Tamm et al. 2007). These studies have all reached the
same conclusion and suggest that haplogroup X2a is
likely to have originated in the same population(s) as
the other American founder haplogroups, by virtue
of having comparable coalescence dates and demo-
graphic histories.
Stanford and Bradley (2012) and Oppenheimer
et al. (2014) have also argued in support of the
Solutrean hypothesis by suggesting that the phylogeo-
graphic distribution of X2a in North America places
the oldest (most basal) X2a lineages in northeastern
Canada, which would be more consistent with an
eastern introduction (and trans-Atlantic migration)
of this haplogroup to the Americas. However, the
newly published findings from the genome of
Kennewick Man of Washington state are clearly at
odds with this assessment. Kennewick Mans
remains were directly dated to 86908400 cal yr BP,
and the question of his affiliation with European
(and Polynesian) populations was explicitly tested
with genome-wide data and rejected (Rasmussen
et al. 2015). He is closely related to other ancient
and contemporary Native Americans and shows
clear Siberian affinities, with no recent European
ancestry. Significantly, Kennewick Mans mitochon-
drial DNA belongs to haplogroup X2a, and he exhi-
bits the most basal X2a lineage yet found
(Rasmussen et al. 2015). Because this study places
the oldest and most basal X2a lineage in the Pacific
Northwest, it deals a serious blow to claims of
genetic support for the Solutrean hypothesis. By
Oppenheimer et al.s own logic, this finding supports
a Beringian, not Solutrean, origin for X2a. Thus,
Kennewick Mans genome strongly suggests that X2a
was not the result of trans-Atlantic gene flow.
3. West Eurasian Ancestryin Native Americans
What about evidence elsewhere in the genome for West
Eurasian ancestry in Native Americans, which
Oppenheimer et al. (2014) also cite as supporting the
Solutrean hypothesis? If the Solutrean hypothesis is
correct, there ought to be ancient European ancestry
in at least some Native American populations, reflect-
ing the genetic contributions of the ancient Solutrean
mariners who would have populated the East Coast.
However, if their contribution to the Native
American gene pool was small, it may only be detect-
able through high resolution analysis of Native
American genomes not through analyses of mito-
chondrial DNA alone. Accordingly, Oppenheimer
et al. (2014) have cited the 12,600 cal yr BP Anzick-1
genome from Montana (Rasmussen et al. 2014) and
the 24,000 cal yr BP Malta (MA-1) genome from
south-central Siberia (Raghavan et al. 2014a) as
Figure 1 Phylogenetic relationships of the X haplogroups mentioned in the text. Tree structure and diagnostic mutations from
PhyloTree (van Oven and Kayser 2009). Dates (in cal yr BP) for the coalescence of haplogroup X2 and subclades are maximum
likelihood estimates using the complete mitochondrial genome (Fagundes et al. 2012). Geographic distribution of clades from
Fagundes et al. (2012) and Reidla et al. (2003). Note the considerable independent evolution that has occurred on the X2g, X2a,
and X2j lineages. X2gs mutational motif and phylogenetic position is noted to be preliminaryand likely to be further refined as
additional sequences become availableon PhyloTree.
Raff and Bolnick Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the Americas?
PaleoAmerica 2015 VOL. 1NO. 4300
showing Pleistocene West Eurasian autosomal
admixture in the Americas, which would be predicted
by the SH [Solutrean Hypothesis](Oppenheimer
et al. 2014, 766). Madsen (2015, 228) has also
suggested that the genetic relationship of Native
Americans to early west Eurasian populations makes
it difficult to rule out a pre-glacial entry point in
eastern North America.
Raghavan et al. (2014b) did estimate, based on the
Malta genome, that 1438% of Native American
ancestry is derived from a population ancestral to con-
temporary western Eurasians, and Rasmussen et al.
(2014) concluded that the Anzick-1 individual had
ancestry from the same ancient population.
However, it is important to parse these statements
carefully, and we note that these studies did not find
that the Pleistocene ancestors of Native Americans
lived in West Eurasia. Rather, as Raghavan et al.
(2014b) suggested, it appears that the relevant ances-
tral population lived farther to the east 24,000 years
ago, extending into south-central Siberia, and the des-
cendants of this ancient population contributed to
both the contemporary West Eurasian gene pool and
the Native American gene pool.
Furthermore, a suite of genomic studies has recently
shown that the contemporary European gene pool
emerged only in the last 8000 years or so, following
large-scale migrations from the east and extensive
admixture and population replacements in western
Eurasia (Allentoft et al. 2015; Gamba et al. 2014;
Haak et al. 2015; Lazaridis et al. 2014). We are
unable to make direct genetic comparisons between
Native Americans and the Solutrean peoples of south-
western Europe because no ancient DNA studies have
included samples from Solutrean-associated skeletal
remains, but the genomic data that are available from
pre-Neolithic huntergatherers in Europe suggest that
they were not closely related to Native Americans
(Allentoft et al. 2015; Haak et al. 2015; Lazaridis
et al. 2014). In other words, changes in the European
gene pool over the last 8000 years have resulted in con-
temporary West Eurasians being more genetically
similar to Native Americans than earlier Europeans
were. Consequently, the genetic connections we see
between Native Americans and West Eurasians today
do not indicate connections between Native
Americans and western Europeans in Pleistocene times.
Oppenheimer et al. (2014) noted that few studies have
formally tested the trans-Atlantic migration hypothesis
alongside other models, and we agree that it is indeed
important to do so. Rasmussen et al. (2014) did evalu-
ate the genetic affinities of the Anzick-1 individual with
143 contemporary populations in Eurasia, and deter-
mined that this ancient Native American was only dis-
tantly related to western Eurasian populations.
Likewise, Rasmussen et al. (2015) explicitly assessed
the degree of shared genetic history between
Kennewick Man and contemporary Europeans, and
found no evidence for European ancestry in
Kennewick Mans genome. Perhaps the best test to
date, though, comes from Lazaridis et al.s (2014)
study, which used ancient and modern genomes to
model the ancestral relationships between Eurasian,
African, and Native American populations. The
model that best fits their data was one in which the
population ancestral to Native Americans was
derived from ancient North Eurasian and East Asian
sources, while contemporary Europeans were derived
from ancient North Eurasian and West Eurasian
sources (Lazaridis et al. 2014). In other words, gene
flow was from the ancestral North Eurasian population
into both the ancestral Native American and ancestral
European populations. Lazaridis et al. (2014) did not
find any evidence of Pleistocene gene flow directly
from West Eurasians into Native Americans. Their
model is also consistent with other studies, which
have shown that 6286% of Native American ancestry
derives from East Asia (Raghavan et al. 2014b).
Altogether, these results seem more consistent with
migration to the Americas through East Asia and
Siberia, as they are most parsimoniously explained by
admixture between groups in Siberia (rather than in
the Americas following separate migrations through
Beringia and across the Atlantic). If West Eurasian
alleles instead reached the Americas via a Solutrean
migration after the initial movement into the Americas
from Beringia, as Oppenheimer et al. (2014) suggest,
we would not expect to see their signature present uni-
formly across all Native American populations, but
rather distributed in a gradient, with the highest levels
around the presumed landing point of the Solutreans.
Instead, the signature of West Eurasian ancestry is
found equally in all Native American genomes tested
to date, and therefore predates the evolution of regional
genetic structure within North and South America
(Raghavan et al. 2014a).
4. Concluding thoughts
We remain unconvinced by the arguments advanced
thus far in favor of a trans-Atlantic migration prior
to 1500 cal yr BP or so. As we have discussed, X2a
has not been found anywhere in Eurasia, and phylo-
geography gives us no compelling reason to think it
is more likely to come from Europe than from
Siberia. Furthermore, analysis of the complete
genome of Kennewick Man, who belongs to the
most basal lineage of X2a yet identified, gives no indi-
cation of recent European ancestry and moves the
location of the deepest branch of X2a to the West
Coast, consistent with X2a belonging to the same
ancestral population as the other founder mitochon-
drial haplogroups. Nor have any high-resolution
Raff and Bolnick Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the Americas?
PaleoAmerica 2015 VOL. 1NO. 4301
studies of genome-wide data from Native American
populations yielded any evidence of Pleistocene
European ancestry or trans-Atlantic gene flow.
It is of course possible that genetic evidence of an
ancient trans-Atlantic migration event simply has not
been found yet. Should credible evidence of direct
gene flow from an ancient Solutrean (or Middle
Eastern) population be found within ancient Native
American genomes, it would require the field to reas-
sess the Beringian onlymodel of prehistoric
Native American migration. However, no such evi-
dence has been found, and the Beringian migration
model remains the best interpretation of the genetic,
archaeological, and paleoclimate data to date.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dennis ORourke, Metin Eren, Michael
Waters, Kelly Graf, Rick Smith, Lauren Springs, and
Aida Miró-Herrans for helpful comments on earlier
versions of this manuscript.
References
Abbott, C. C. 1877. On the discovery of supposed paleolithic
implements from the glacial drift in the valley of the
Delaware River, Near Trenton, New Jersey.Annual Report
of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and
Ethnology 10: 3043.
Achilli, A., U. A. Perego, C. M. Bravi, M. D. Coble, Q.-P. Kong,
S. R. Woodward, A. Salas, A. Torroni, and H.-J. Bandelt.
2008. The phylogeny of the four pan-American mtDNA hap-
logroups: Implications for evolutionary and disease studies.
PLoS One 3(3): e1764.
Achilli, A., U. A. Perego, H. Lancioni, A. Olivieri, F. Gandini, B. H.
Kashani, V. Battaglia, V. Grugni, N. Angerhofer, M. P. Rogers,
R. J. Herrera, S. R. Woodward, D. Labuda, D. G. Smith, J. S.
Cybulski, O. Semino, R. S. Malhi, and A. Torroni. 2013.
Reconciling migration models to the Americas with the vari-
ation of North American native mitogenomes.Proceedings
of the National Academy of the Sciences USA 110:
1430814313.
Allentoft, M. E., M. Sikora, K. G. Sjögren, S. Rasmussen, M.
Rasmussen, J. Stenderup, P. B. Damgaard, H. Schroeder, T.
Ahlström, L. Vinner, A. S. Malaspinas, A. Margaryan, T.
Higham, D. Chivall, N. Lynnerup, L. Harvig, J. Baron, P.
Della Casa, P. Da˛browski, P. R. Duffy, A. V. Ebel, A.
Epimakhov, K. Frei, M. Furmanek, T. Gralak, A. Gromov,
S. Gronkiewicz, G. Grupe, T. Hajdu, R. Jarysz, V.
Khartanovich, A. Khokhlov, V. Kiss, J. Kolár
ˇ, A. Kriiska, I.
Lasak, C. Longhi, G. McGlynn, A. Merkevicius, I. Merkyte,
M. Metspalu, R. Mkrtchyan, V. Moiseyev, L. Paja, G. Pálfi,
D. Pokutta, Ł. Pospieszny, T. D. Price, L. Saag, M. Sablin,
N. Shishlina, V. Smrc
ˇka, V. I. Soenov, V. Szeverényi, G. Tóth,
S. V. Trifanova, L. Varul, M. Vicze, L. Yepiskoposyan, V.
Zhitenev, L. Orlando, T. Sicheritz-Pontén, S. Brunak, R.
Nielsen, K. Kristiansen, and E. Willerslev. 2015. Population
genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia.Nature 522: 167172.
Bolnick, D. A., D. I. Bolnick, and D. G. Smith. 2006. Asymmetric
male and female genetic histories among native Americans
from eastern North America.Molecular Biology and
Evolution 23: 21612174.
Bolnick, D. A., and D. G. Smith. 2007. Migration and social struc-
ture among the Hopewell: Evidence from ancient DNA.
American Antiquity 72: 627644.
Bradley, B., and D. Stanford. 2004. The North Atlantic ice-edge
corridor: A possible Palaeolithic route to the New World.
World Archaeology 36: 459478.
Brown, M. D., S. H. Hosseini, A. Torroni, H.-J. Bandelt, J. C. Allen,
T. G. Schurr, R. Scozzari,F. Cruciani, and D. C. Wallace. 1998.
mtDNA Haplogroup X: An ancient link between Europe/
Western Asia and North America?American Journal of
Human Genetics 63: 18521861.
Crawford, M. H. 1998. The Origins of Native Americas: Evidence
from Anthropological Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Derenko, M. V., T. Grzybowski, B. A. Malyarchuk, J. Czarny, D.
Miscicka-Sliwka, and I. A. Zakharov. 2001. The presence of
mitochondrial haplogroup X in Altaians from South Siberia.
American Journal of Human Genetics 67: 237241.
Dillehay, T. D., C. Ramirez, M. Pino, M. B. Collins, J. Rossen, and
J. D. Pino-Navarro. 2008. Monte Verde: Seaweed, food, medi-
cine, and the peopling of South America.Science 320:
784786.
Dobyns, H. F. 1983. Their Number Become Thinned: Native
American Population Dynamics in Eastern North America.
Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Eren, M. I., M. T. Boulanger, and M. J. OBrien. 2015. The Cinmar
discovery and the proposed pre-Late Glacial Maximum occu-
pation of North America.Journal of Archaeological Science:
Reports 2: 708713.
Eren, M. I., R. J. Patten, M. J. OBrien, and D. J. Meltzer. 2013.
Refuting the technological cornerstone of the Ice-Age
Atlantic crossing hypothesis.Journal of Archaeological
Science 40: 29342941.
Fagundes, N. J. R., R. Kanitz, R. Eckert, A. C. S. Valls, M. R.
Bogo, F. M. Salzano, D. G. Smith, W. A. Silva, M. A. Zago,
A. K. Ribeiro-dos-Santos, S. E. B. Santos, M. L. Petzl-Erler,
and S. L. Bonatto. 2008. Mitochondrial population genomics
supports a single pre-Clovis origin with a coastal route for the
peopling of the Americas.American Journal of Human
Genetics 82: 583592.
Fernandes, V., F. Alshamali, M. Alves, M. D. Costa, J. B. Pereira,
N. M. Silva, L. Cherni, N. Harich, V. Cerny, P. Soares, M. B.
Richards, and L. Pereira. 2012. The Arabian cradle:
Mitochondrial relicts of the first steps along the southern
route out of Africa.American Journal of Human Genetics
90: 34755.
Gamba, C., E. R. Jones, M. D. Teasdale, R. L. McLaughlin, G.
Gonzalez-Fortes, V. Mattiangeli, L. Domboróczki, I. Ko
˝vári,
I. Pap, A. Anders, A. Whittle, J. Dani, P. Raczky, T. F.
Higham, M. Hofreiter, D. G. Bradley, and R. Pinhasi. 2014.
Genome flux and stasis in a five millennium transect of
European prehistory.Nature Communications 5: 5257.
Greenman, E. F. 1963. The Upper Paleolithic and the New World.
Current Anthropology 4: 4191.
Haak, Wolfgang, Iosif Lazaridis, Nick Patterson, Nadin Rohland,
Swapan Mallick, Bastien Llamas, Guido Brandt, Susanne
Nordenfelt, Eadaoin Harney, Kristin Stewardson, Qiaomei
Fu, Alissa Mittnik, Eszter Bánffy, Christos Economou,
Michael Francken, Susanne Friederich, Rafael Garrido Pena,
Fredrik Hallgren, Valery Khartanovich, Aleksandr Khokhlov,
Michael Kunst, Pavel Kuznetsov, Harald Meller, Oleg
Mochalov, Vayacheslav Moiseyev, Nicole Nicklisch,Sandra L.
Pichler, Roberto Risch, Manuel A. Rojo Guerra, Christina
Roth, Anna Szécsényi-Nagy, Joachim Wahl, Matthias Meyer,
Johannes Krause, Dorcas Brown, David Anthony, Alan
Cooper, Kurt Werner Alt, and David Reich. 2015. Massive
migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European
languages in Europe.Nature 522 (7555): 207211.
Helgason, A., E. Hickey, S. Goodacre, V. Bosnes, K. Stefánsson, R.
Ward, and B. Sykes. 2001. mtDNA and the Islands of the
North Atlantic: Estimating the Proportions of Norse and
Gaelic Ancestry.American Journal of Human Genetics 68:
72337.
Hibben, F. 1941. Evidences of early occupation in Sandia Cave,
New Mexico, and other sites in the Sandia-Manzano region.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection 99(23).
Hoffecker, J. F., S. A. Elias, and D. H. ORourke. 2014. Out of
Beringia?Science 343: 979980.
Hunley, K. L., and M. E. Healy. 2011. The impact of founder
effects, gene flow, and European admixture on Native
American genetic diversity.American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 146: 530538.
Kashani, H. B., U. A. Perego, A. Olivieri, N. Angerhofer, F.
Gandini, V. Carossa, H. Lancioni, O. Semino, S. R.
Woodward, A. Achilli, and A. Torroni. 2012. Mitochondrial
haplogroup C4c: A rare lineage entering America through the
ice-free corridor?American Journal of Physical Anthropology
147: 3539.
Kemp, B. M., and T. G. Schurr. 2010. Ancient and modern genetic
variation in the Americas.In Human Variation in the
Americas, edited by Benjamin M. Auerbach, 1250. Center
Raff and Bolnick Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the Americas?
PaleoAmerica 2015 VOL. 1NO. 4302
for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 38.
Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Kitchen, A. M., M. M. Miyamoto, and C. J. Mulligan. 2008. A
three-stage colonization model for the peopling of the
Americas.PLoS One 3(2): e1596.
Lazaridis, I., N. Patterson, A. Mittnik, G. Renaud, S. Mallick, K.
Kirsanow, P. H. Sudmant, J. G. Schraiber, S. Castellano, M.
Lipson, B. Berger, C. Economou, R. Bollongino, Q. Fu, K. I.
Bos, S. Nordenfelt, H. Li, C. de Filippo, K. Prüfer, S.
Sawyer, C. Posth, W. Haak, F. Hallgren, E. Fornander, N.
Rohland, D. Delsate, M. Francken, J. M. Guinet, J. Wahl, G.
Ayodo, H. A. Babiker, G. Bailliet, E. Balanovska, O.
Balanovsky, R. Barrantes, G. Bedoya, H. Ben-Ami, J. Bene,
F. Berrada, C. M. Bravi, F. Brisighelli, G. B. Busby, F. Cali,
M. Churnosov, D. E. Cole, D. Corach, L. Damba, G. van
Driem, S. Dryomov, J. M. Dugoujon, S. A. Fedorova, I.
Gallego, Romero, M. Gubina, M. Hammer, B. M. Henn, T.
Hervig, U. Hodoglugil, A. R. Jha, S. Karachanak-Yankova,
R. Khusainova, E. Khusnutdinova, R. Kittles, T. Kivisild, W.
Klitz, V. Kuc
ˇinskas, A. Kushniarevich, L. Laredj, S. Litvinov,
T. Loukidis, R. W. Mahley, B. Melegh, E. Metspalu, J.
Molina, J. Mountain, K. Näkkäläjärvi, D. Nesheva, T.
Nyambo, L. Osipova, J. Parik, F. Platonov, O. Posukh, V.
Romano, F. Rothhammer, I. Rudan, R. Ruizbakiev, H.
Sahakyan, A. Sajantila, A. Salas, E. B. Starikovskaya, A.
Tarekegn, D. Toncheva, S. Turdikulova, I. Uktveryte, O.
Utevska, R. Vasquez, M. Villena, M. Voevoda, C. A.
Winkler, L. Yepiskoposyan, P. Zalloua, T. Zemunik, A.
Cooper, C. Capelli, M. G. Thomas, A. Ruiz-Linares, S. A.
Tishkoff, L. Singh, K. Thangaraj, R. Villems, D. Comas, R.
Sukernik, M. Metspalu, M. Meyer, E. E. Eichler, J. Burger,
M. Slatkin, S. Pääbo, J. Kelso, D. Reich, and J. Krause.
2014. Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral popu-
lations for present-day Europeans.Nature 513: 409413.
Livi-Bacci, M. 2006. The depopulation of Hispanic America after
the conquest.Population and Development Review 32:
199232.
Madsen, D. B. 2015. A framework for the initial occupation of the
Americas.PaleoAmerica 1: 217250.
Malhi, R. S., and D. G. Smith. 2002. Brief communication:
Haplogroup X confirmed in prehistoric North America.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 118: 8486.
Malhi, R. S., Gonzalez-Oliver, A., Kemp, B. M., and Schroeder,
K. B. Distribution of Y chromosomes among native North
Americans: a study of Athapaskan population history.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 137 (2008):
412424.
Meldrum, R. L. 2009. Rediscovering the Book of Mormon Remnant
through DNA. Honeoye Falls, NY: Digital Legend Press.
Moreno-Estrada, A., S. Gravel, F. Zakharia, J. A. McCauley, J. K.
Byrnes, C. R. Givnoux, P. A. Ortiz-Tello, R. J. Martineq, D. J.
Hedges, R. W. Morris, C. Eng, K. Sandoval, S. Acevedo-
Acevedo, P. J. Norman, Z. Layrisse, P. Parham, J. C.
Martinez-Cruzado, E. G. Burchard, M. L. Cuccaro, E. R.
Martin, and C. D. Bustamante. 2013. Reconstructing the
population genetic history of the Caribbean.PLoS Genetics
9(11): e1003925.
Mulligan, C. J., A. Kitchen, and M. M. Miyamoto. 2008. Updated
three-stage model for the peopling of the Americas.PLoS One
3(9): e3199.
OBrien, M. J., M. T. Boulanger, M. Collard, B. Buchanan, L. Tarle,
L. G. Straus, and M. I. Eren. 2014. On thin ice: Problems with
Stanford and Bradleys proposed Solutrean colonization of
North America.Antiquity 88: 606624.
Oppenheimer, S., B. Bradley, and D. Stanford. 2014. Solutrean
hypothesis: Genetics, the mammoth in the room.Worl d
Archaeology 46: 752774.
ORourke, D. H., and J. A. Raff. 2010. The human genetic history
of the Americas: The final frontier.Current Biology 20:
R202R207.
Perego, U. A., A. Achilli, N. Angerhofer, M. Accetturo, M. Pala, A.
Olivieri, B. H. Kashani, K. H. Ritchie, R. Scozzari, Q.-P.
Kong, N. M. Myres, A. Salas, O. Semino, H.-J. Bandelt,
S. R. Woodward, and A. Torroni. 2009. Distinctive Paleo-
Indian migration routes from Beringia marked by two rare
mtDNA haplogroups.Current Biology 19: 18.
Philips, K. 2014. Solutrean seal hunters? Modeling trans-Atlantic
migration parameters fundamental to the Solutrean solution
for the peopling of the Americas.Journal of Anthropological
Research 70: 573600.
Raff, J. A., and D. A. Bolnick. 2014. Palaeogenomics: Genetic
roots of the first Americans.Nature 506: 162163.
Raff, J. A., D. A. Bolnick, J. Tackney, and D. H. ORourke. 2011.
Ancient DNA perspectives on American colonization and
population history.American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 146: 503514.
Raff, J. A., M. Rzhetskaya, J. Tackney, and M. G. Hayes. 2015.
Mitochondrial diversity of Inupiat people from the Alaskan
North Slope provides evidence for the origins of the Paleo-
and Neo-Eskimo peoples.American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 157: 603614.
Raghavan, M., M. DeGiorgio, A. Albrechtsen, I. Moltke, P.
Skoglund, T. S. Korneliussen, B. Grønnow, M. Appelt, H. C.
Gulløv, T. M. Friesen, W. Fitzhugh, H. Malmström, S.
Rasmussen, J. Olsen, L. Melchior, B. T. Fuller, S. M. Fahrni,
T. Stafford Jr., V. Grimes, M. A. Renouf, J. Cybulski, N.
Lynnerup, M. M. Lahr, K. Britton, R. Knecht, J. Arneborg,
M. Metspalu, O. E. Cornejo, A. S. Malaspinas, Y. Wang, M.
Rasmussen, V. Raghavan, T. V. Hansen, E. Khusnutdinova,
T. Pierre, K. Dneprovsky, C. Andreasen, H. Lange, M. G.
Hayes, J. Coltrain, V. A. Spitsyn, A. Götherström, L.
Orlando, T. Kivisild, R. Villems, M. H. Crawford, F. C.
Nielsen, J. Dissing, J. Heinemeier, M. Meldgaard, C.
Bustamante, D. H. ORourke, M. Jakobsson, M. T. Gilbert,
R. Nielsen, and E. Willerslev. 2014a. The genetic prehistory
of the New World Arctic.Science 345: 1255832.
Raghavan, M., P. Skoglund, K. E. Graf, M. Metspalu, A.
Albrechtsen, I. Moltke, S. Rasmussen, T. W. Stafford Jr., L.
Orlando, E. Metspalu, M. Karmin, K. Tambets, S. Rootsi,
R. Mägi, P. F. Campos, E. Balanovska, O. Balanovsky, E.
Khusnutdinova, S. Litvinov, L. P. Osipova, S. A. Fedorova,
M. I. Voevoda, M. DeGiorgio, T. Sicheritz-Ponten, S.
Brunak, S. Demeshchenko, T. Kivisild, R. Villems, R.
Nielsen, M. Jakobsson, and E. Willerslev. 2014b. Upper
Paleolithic Siberian genome reveals dual ancestry of Native
Americans.Nature 505: 8791.
Raghavan, M., M. Steinrücken, K. Harris, S. Schiffels, S.
Rasmussen, M. DeGiorgio, A. Albrechtsen, C. Valdiosera,
M. C. Ávila-Arcos, A. S. Malaspinas, A. Eriksson, I. Moltke,
M. Metspalu, J. R. Homburger, J. Wall, O. E. Cornejo, J. V.
Moreno-Mayar, T. S. Korneliussen, T. Pierre, M. Rasmussen,
P. F. Campos, P. de Baros Damgaard, M. E. Allentoft, J.
Lindo, E. Metspalu, R. Rodríguez-Varela, J. Mansilla, C.
Henrickson, A. Seguin-Orlando, H. Malmström, T. Stafford,
Jr., S. S. Shringarpure, A. Moreno-Estrada, M. Karmin, K.
Tambets, A. Bergström, Y. Xue, V. Warmuth, A. D. Friend,
J. Singarayer, P. Valdes, F. Balloux, I. Leboreiro, J. L. Vera,
H. Rangel-Villalobos, D. Pettener, D. Luiselli, L. G. Davis,
E. Heyer, C. P. Zollikofer, M. S. Ponce de León, C. I. Smith,
V. Grimes, K. A. Pike, M. Deal, B. T. Fuller, B. Arriaza, V.
Standen, M. F. Luz, F. Ricaut, N. Guidon, L. Osipova, M. I.
Voevoda, O. L. Posukh, O. Balanovsky, M. Lavryashina, Y.
Bogunov, E. Khusnutdinova, M. Gubina, E. Balanovska, S.
Fedorova, S. Litvinov, B. Malyarchuk, M. Derenko, M. J.
Mosher, D. Archer, J. Cybulski, B. Petzelt, J. Mitchell, R.
Worl, P. J. Norman, P. Parham, B. M. Kemp, T. Kivisild, C.
Tyler-Smith, M. S. Sandhu, M. Crawford, R. Villems, D. G.
Smith, M. R. Waters, T. Goebel, J. R. Johnson, R. S. Malhi,
M. Jakobsson, D. J. Meltzer, A. Manica, R. Durbin, C. D.
Bustamante, Y. S. Song, R. Nielsen, and E. Willerslev.
2015. Genomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent popu-
lation history of Native Americans.Science 349(6250):
aab3884.
Rasmussen, M., S. L. Anzick, M. R. Waters, P. Skoglund, M.
DeGiorgio, T. W. Stafford Jr., S. Rasmussen, I. Moltke, A.
Albrechtsen, S. M. Doyle, G. D. Poznik, V. Gudmundsdottir,
R. Yadav, A-S. Malaspinas, S. S. V. White, M. E. Allentoft,
O. E. Cornejo, K. Tambets, A. Eriksson, P. D. Heintzman,
M. Karmin, T. S. Korneliussen, D. J. Meltzer, T. L. Pierre, J.
Stenderup, L. Saag, V. M. Warmuth, M. C. Lopes, R. S.
Malhi, S. Brunak, T. Sicheritz-Ponten, I. Barnes, M. Collins,
L. Orlando, F. Balloux, A. Manica, R. Gupta, M. Metspalu,
C. D. Bustamante, M. Jakobsson, R. Nielsen, and E.
Willerslev. 2014. The genome of a late Pleistocene human
from a Clovis burial site in western Montana.Nature 506:
225229.
M. Rasmussen, M. Sikora, A. Albrechtsen, T. S. Korneliussen, J. V.
Moreno-Mayar, G. D. Poznik, C. P. Zollikofer, M. S. Ponce de
León, M. E. Allentoft, I. Moltke, H. Jónsson, C. Valdiosera, R.
S. Malhi, L. Orlando, C. D. Bustamante, T. W. Stafford Jr., D.
Raff and Bolnick Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the Americas?
PaleoAmerica 2015 VOL. 1NO. 4303
J. Meltzer, R. Nielsen, E. Willerslev. The ancestry and affilia-
tions of Kennewick Man.Nature (2015).
Reich, D., N. Patterson, D. Campbell, A. Tandon, S. Mazieres, N.
Ray, M. V. Parra, W. Rojas, C. Duque, N. Mesa, L. F.
García, O. Triana, S. Blair, A. Maestre, J. C. Dib, C. M.
Bravi, G. Bailliet, D. Corach, T. Hünemeier, M. C. Bortolini,
F. M. Salzano, M. L. Petzl-Erler, V. Acuña-Alonzo, C.
Aguilar-Salinas, S. Canizales-Quinteros, T. Tusié-Luna, L.
Riba, M. Rodríguez-Cruz, M. Lopez-Alarcón, R. Coral-
Vazquez, T. Canto-Cetina, I. Silva-Zolezzi, J. C. Fernandez-
Lopez, A. V. Contreras, G. Jimenez-Sanchez, M. J. Gómez-
Vázquez, J. Molina, A. Carracedo, A. Salas, C. Gallo, G.
Poletti, D. B. Witonsky, G. Alkorta-Aranburu, R. I.
Sukernik, L. Osipova, S. A. Fedorova, R. Vasquez, M.
Villena, C. Moreau, R. Barrantes, D. Pauls, L. Excoffier, G.
Bedoya, F. Rothhammer, J. M. Dugoujon, G. Larrouy, W.
Klitz, D. Labuda, J. Kidd, K. Kidd, A. Di Rienzo, N. B.
Freimer, A. L. Price, and A. Ruiz-Linares. 2012.
Reconstructing Native American population history.Nature
488: 370374.
Reidla, M., T. Kivisild, E. Metspalu, K. Kaldma, K. Tambets, H. V.
Tolk, J. Parik, E. L. Loogväli, M. Derenko, B. Malyarchuk, M.
Bermisheva, S. Zhadanov, E. Pennarun, M. Gubina, M.
Golubenko, L. Damba, S. Fedorova, V. Gusar, E.
Grechanina, I. Mikerezi, J. P. Moisan, A. Chaventré, E.
Khusnutdinova, L. Osipova, V. Stepanov, M. Voevoda, A.
Achilli, C. Rengo, O. Rickards, G. F. De Stefano, S. Papiha,
L. Beckman, B. Janicijevic, P. Rudan, N. Anagnou, E.
Michalodimitrakis, S. Koziel, E. Usanga, T. Geberhiwot, C.
Herrnstadt, N. Howell, A. Torroni, and R. Villems. 2003.
Origin and diffusion of mtDNA Haplogroup X.American
Journal of Human Genetics 73: 11781190.
Sellet, F. 1998. The French connection: Investigating a possible
Clovis-Solutrean Link.Current Research in the Pleistocene
15: 6768.
Skoglund, P., S. Mallick, M. C. Bortolini, N. Chennagiri, T.
Hunemeler, M. L. Petzl-Erler, F. M. Salzano, N. Patterson,
and D. Reich. 2015. Genetic evidence for two founding popu-
lations of the Americas.Nature 525: 104108.
Smith, M. T. 1987. Archaeology of Aboriginal Culture Change in the
Interior Southeast: Depopulation during the Early Historic
Period. Gainsville: University of Florida Press.
Smith, D. G., R. S. Malhi, J. Eshleman, J. G. Lorenz, and F. A.
Kaestle. 1999. Distribution of mtDNA haplogroup X among
native North Americans.American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 110: 271284.
Smith, R. W. A., K. Manriquez, J. Mata-Miguez, D. G. Smith, and
D. A. Bolnick. 2014. Genetic variation among Native North
Americans with complex ancestries: Implications for
contemporary tribal diversity and recent population history.
Paper presented at the American Association of Physical
Anthropology Annual Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, April 912.
Smith, David Glenn, Ripan S. Malhi, Jason A. Eshleman, Frederika
A. Kaestle, and Brian M. Kemp. 2005. Mitochondrial DNA
Haplogroups of Paleoamericans in North America. In
Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, edited by Robson
Bonnichsen, Bradley T. Lepper, Dennis Stanford, and
Michael R. Waters, pp. 243254. College Station: Texas
A&M University Press.
Smoot, S., R. Stout, and B. McLerran. 2010. The Lost Civilizations
of North America. DVD. Directed by R. Stout. Bountiful, UT:
Digital Legends.
Stanford, D. J., andB. Bradley. 2012. Across Atlantic Ice: The Origin
of Americas Clovis Culture. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Straus, L. G., D. J. Meltzer, and T. Goebel. 2005. Ice age Atlantis?
Exploring the Solutrean-Clovis connection.World
Archaeology 37: 507532.
Tamm, E., T. Kivisild, M. Reidla, M. Metspalu, D. G. Smith, C. J.
Mulligan, C. M. Bravi, O. Rickards, C. Martinez-Labarga,
E. K. Khusnutdinova, S. A. Fedorova, M. V. Golubenko,
V. A. Stepanov, M. A. Gubina, S. I. Zhadanov, L. P.
Osipova, L. Damba, M. I. Voevoda, J. E. Dipierri, R.
Villems, and R. S. Malhi. 2007. Beringian standstill and
spread of Native American founders.PLoS One 2(9): e829.
Ubelaker, D. H. 2006. Population size: Contact to nadir.In
Handbook of North American Indians: Environment, Origins,
and Population, edited by D. Stanford, B. D. Smith, D. H.
Ubelaker, and E. J. E. Szathmary, 694701. Washington, DC:
Smithsonian Institution Press.
van Oven and Kayser. 2009. Updated comprehensive phylogenetic
tree of global human mitochondrial DNA variation.Human
Mutation 30(2): E386E394. doi:10.1002/humu.20921.
Verdu, P., T. J. Pemberton, R. Laurent, B. M. Kemp, A. Gonzalez-
Oliver, C. Gorodezky, C. E. Hughes, M. R. Shattuck, B.
Petzelt, J. Mitchell, H. Harry, T. William, R. Worl, J. S.
Cybulski, N. A. Rosenberg, and R. S. Malhi. 2014. Patterns
of admixture and population structure in Native populations
of northwest North America.PLoS Genetics 10(8): e1004530.
Zegura, S. L., T. M. Karafet, L. A. Zhivotovsky, and M. F.
Hammer. 2004. High-resolution SNPs and microsatellite hap-
lotypes point to a single, recent entry of Native American Y
chromosomes into the Americas.Molecular Biology and
Evolution 21: 164175.
Zlojutro M., Rubicz, R., Crawford, M.H. 2009. Mitochondrial
DNA and Y-chromosome variation in five eastern Aleut com-
munities: evidence for genetic substructure in the Aleut popu-
lation.Annals of Human Biology 36: 511526.
Author Biographies
Jennifer Raff is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology at the University of Kansas. She
trained in a dual program in Genetics, Molecular, Cell, Developmental Biology and Biological Anthropology
at Indiana University, and conducted subsequent postdoctoral research at the University of Utah,
Northwestern University, and the University of Texas. Her research focuses on the genetics of Native
Americans in both ancient and contemporary populations, and encompasses questions about the initial peopling
of the Americas, as well as region-specific histories in the North American Arctic and Midcontinental United
States. She is also actively engaged in public outreach on issues pertaining to physical anthropology, genetics,
and scientific literacy through writing (primarily at www.violentmetaphors.com), public speaking, and social
media (primarily at https://twitter.com/JenniferRaff).
Deborah Bolnick is an Associate Professor of Anthropology and affiliated with the Population Research Center
at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her Ph.D. in Anthropology from the University of California at
Davis. Her research examines genetic variation in Native American populations and how it has been shaped by
culture, history, and geography. As part of this research, she collaborates with indigenous individuals in the
southern US, and analyzes DNA from both ancient and contemporary populations to track changes in genetic
diversity over time and to help reconstruct population history in the Americas. She is also interested in the
ethical, legal, social, and political implications of genetic research, including the ways in which genetic ancestry
studies intersect with Euro-American and indigenous ideas about race, ethnicity, and identity.
Raff and Bolnick Does Mitochondrial Haplogroup X Indicate Ancient Trans-Atlantic Migration to the Americas?
PaleoAmerica 2015 VOL. 1NO. 4304
... The transatlantic model, proposing ancient connections between Native Americans and Pleistocene Europeans, received criticism and is not considered a viable alternative today (reviewed by Powell 2005;Raff and Bolnick 2015;Meltzer 2021). Despite this, some biological evidence provided independent support to it. ...
... Current genetic evidence shows that this haplogroup descended from peoples in eastern Siberia who were related to the ancestors of both contemporary East Asians and West Eurasians (Kemp and Schurr 2010;O'Rourke and Raff 2010;Raghavan et al. 2014b). It is considered a uniquely North American haplogroup, found at the highest frequencies in Great Lakes populations and lower frequencies in the Plains and the Pacific Northwest (Raff and Bolnick 2015). ...
... Kennewick Man, recovered from the archaeological site with the same name (8700 cal years BP; Fig. 2), was initially described in forensic terms as "Caucasoid" due to morphological features such as dolichocephalic skull and narrow face, leading to suggested affinities with pre-modern Europeans (Chatters 2000). However, subsequent genetic studies revealed that his mitochondrial DNA exhibits one of the most basal X2a lineages (Rasmussen et al. 2015), and his origins can be traced back to native groups from the North West of North America (Raff and Bolnick 2015;Rasmussen et al. 2015). Current genetic data supports the model that the population ancestral to Native Americans was derived from ancient North Eurasian and East Asian sources. ...
Article
Full-text available
The questions – When did humans arrive in the Americas? Who were they, or from where did they come from? – are enduring and fascinating inquiries that have been approached from different perspectives, thanks to the contributions of archaeology, biological anthropology, and linguistics, among other disciplines. As a result, and after several centuries of studies, this body of research inspired several proposed models on the peopling of the Americas. These models are not only equally unique from each other but also distinct from the current themes in recent literature. However, there is a limited and occasionally inaccurate reference to the knowledge produced in the peripheral countries. This may be attributed to differences in language, academic traditions, as well as the consequences of geopolitics and neocolonialism in science. By reviewing both the old and recent literature, my aim is to present a historical account of how biological evidence has contributed to supporting and discussing some of the broad models that were proposed to explain the peopling of the Americas. Instead of providing an exhaustive account of the models, herein I focus on critically linking evidence and discussions ranging from the early skeletal discoveries at Lagoa Santa in Brazil in the 1830s to the current challenges of integrating a large amount of disparate data and collaborating with indigenous communities in the “omics” era. Far from being fully understood, investigations into the antiquity and the ancestral origin of Native Americans are revealing that these complex questions should be addressed by combining diverse data, articulating information at finer and larger grain scales, and adopting a sensitive and respectful approach by engaging with the views of indigenous communities.
... Given the explosive growth of genetic data in recent years, the time is right to re-evaluate hypotheses regarding the peopling of the Americas with a synthesis of biological and archaeological evidence (e.g., Pinotti and Santos 2020;Raff and Bolnick 2015). In what follows, we address the "Out of Japan" hypothesis with the data and methods of biological anthropologyboth anatomical and geneticand show that the people who made the Incipient Jomon artifacts are an unlikely source for Indigenous Americans. ...
Article
Full-text available
A widely accepted model for the peopling of the Americas postulates a source population in the Northeast Asian maritime region, which includes northern Japan. The model is based on similarities in stone artifacts (stemmed points) found in North American sites dating as early as 15,000 years ago and those of comparable age in Japan and neighboring regions of Northeast Asia. Here we show, on the basis of data and analyses in biological anthropology, that the people who made stemmed points in northern Japan (labeled “Incipient Jomon” in the archaeological literature) represent an unlikely source population for the indigenous peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
... One of the most important pieces of genetic evidence relevant to the peopling of the Americas was the sequencing of a genome from the remains of a child ('Anzick-1') buried with Clovis artifacts in western Montana and directly dated to 12,600 before present (BP) [25]. This child was consistent with deriving all of his ancestry from the same founding population as Central and South Americans (Figure 1), contradicting the 'Solutrean hypothesis' [26] that posits genetic discontinuity between the makers of the Clovis industry and present-day Native Americans [27]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Whole-genome studies have documented that most Native American ancestry stems from a single population that diversified within the continent more than twelve thousand years ago. However, this shared ancestry hides a more complex history whereby at least four distinct streams of Eurasian migration have contributed to present-day and prehistoric Native American populations. Whole genome studies enhanced by technological breakthroughs in ancient DNA now provide evidence of a sequence of events involving initial migration from a structured Northeast Asian source population, followed by a divergence into northern and southern Native American lineages. During the Holocene, new migrations from Asia introduced the Saqqaq/Dorset Paleoeskimo population to the North American Arctic ~4,500 years ago, ancestry that is potentially connected with ancestry found in Athabaskan-speakers today. This was then followed by a major new population turnover in the high Arctic involving Thule-related peoples who are the ancestors of present-day Inuit. We highlight several open questions that could be addressed through future genomic research.
... bp 33 ) and Clovis lithic technologies, as well as evidence for pre-Columbian genetic admixture between ancestral Native American and West Eurasian populations. However, this hypothesis has been rejected on technological and genetic grounds 34,35 . If transatlantic migration is set aside and an Asian origin assumed, the antiquity and distribution of the early sites suggest that the initial crossing of the 48th parallel north occurred either (i) during the later part of Marine Isotope Stage 3 (57-29 ka) 36 , when ice and sea level estimates [37][38][39] indicate that land passage through Beringia was unlikely or interrupted, and an ice-free corridor between the Laurentide and Cordilleran Ice Sheets was probably present 39 (with evidence of terrestrial landscapes occurring between 48 and 40 ka 40 ) or (ii) during the LGM terminus, when the Bering land bridge was viable but the ice-free corridor was inaccessible 41,42 . ...
Article
Full-text available
The peopling of the Americas marks a major expansion of humans across the planet. However, questions regarding the timing and mechanisms of this dispersal remain, and the previously accepted model (termed ‘Clovis-first’)—suggesting that the first inhabitants of the Americas were linked with the Clovis tradition, a complex marked by distinctive fluted lithic points¹—has been effectively refuted. Here we analyse chronometric data from 42 North American and Beringian archaeological sites using a Bayesian age modelling approach, and use the resulting chronological framework to elucidate spatiotemporal patterns of human dispersal. We then integrate these patterns with the available genetic and climatic evidence. The data obtained show that humans were probably present before, during and immediately after the Last Glacial Maximum (about 26.5–19 thousand years ago)2,3 but that more widespread occupation began during a period of abrupt warming, Greenland Interstadial 1 (about 14.7–12.9 thousand years before ad 2000)⁴. We also identify the near-synchronous commencement of Beringian, Clovis and Western Stemmed cultural traditions, and an overlap of each with the last dates for the appearance of 18 now-extinct faunal genera. Our analysis suggests that the widespread expansion of humans through North America was a key factor in the extinction of large terrestrial mammals.
... 57 Modern DNA analyses have consistently failed to demonstrate pre-Columbian trans-Atlantic migration to the Americas. 58 Regardless, Mormon apologetics reject these data by pointing to Mesoamerican structures as the "limited geography theory" of Mormon engagement in only that geographical area and emphasize that the lack of evidence would not disprove the historicity of the Book of Mormon. 59 A case of emotional dismissal of the accumulating DNA evidence is provided by David G. Stewart Jr.: "Claims of critics (…) only demonstrate the profound intellectual poverty of critics' arguments." ...
Article
Full-text available
Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion–conflict, independence, dialogue, integration–insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion–science interaction.
Article
The peopling process of North and South America started in Northeast Asia and was a cultural evolutionary event. An evolutionary approach to archaeology, however, begins with detailed description of assemblages. The Uptar site, Russia, played a prominent role in debates about New World colonization, due to the presence of a “fluted” bifacially flaked stone lanceolate. However, in recent years, Uptar has received less attention. We were given the opportunity to study a sample of the Uptar lithic assemblage, and here we compiled descriptions based on thin-sections for mineralogical and textural analyses; X-ray diffraction (XRD) for mineralogical identification; X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for geochemical analysis; computerized axial micro-tomography (MicroCT) for micro-textural analysis; technological descriptions; morphometric analysis of its bifaces; and microwear. At a very basic level, our reexamination of this Uptar lithic sample suggests that the site was potentially a re-tooling site, whereby used or broken tools were discarded and new tools were manufactured. We found little evidence of microblade technology in our sample. Our results also suggest that fluted-point technology continues to be absent in Northeast Asia, and that the precise relationship of Uptar to North American Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene cultures remains unknown. Most importantly, our report provides descriptive data that can be used by others in future comparative and meta analyses.
Article
This article summarizes my experience at Baltimore AlienCon in 2018. The programme offered a curious blend of themes explored in Ancient Aliens and similar programming, alongside other domains of ‘pseudoscience’, ‘rogue’ archaeology, and conspiracy theory, with an added touch of science-fiction fandom and marketing for Prometheus Entertainment. Framed by the event, this article considers aliens, heritage, and belonging in the United States at a moment of unprecedented misinformation campaigns and historical racial reckoning. It explores how archaeological expertise is implicated, invoked, and rejected in such forums and their associated media; and questions how anthropologists and archaeologists might reckon with the often-troubling widespread public uptake of their knowledge into influential conspiracies.
Article
In less than a decade, analyses of ancient genomes have transformed our understanding of the Indigenous peopling and population history of the Americas. These studies have shown that this history, which began in the late Pleistocene epoch and continued episodically into the Holocene epoch, was far more complex than previously thought. It is now evident that the initial dispersal involved the movement from northeast Asia of distinct and previously unknown populations, including some for whom there are no currently known descendants. The first peoples, once south of the continental ice sheets, spread widely, expanded rapidly and branched into multiple populations. Their descendants—over the next fifteen millennia—experienced varying degrees of isolation, admixture, continuity and replacement, and their genomes help to illuminate the relationships among major subgroups of Native American populations. Notably, all ancient individuals in the Americas, save for later-arriving Arctic peoples, are more closely related to contemporary Indigenous American individuals than to any other population elsewhere, which challenges the claim—which is based on anatomical evidence—that there was an early, non-Native American population in the Americas. Here we review the patterns revealed by ancient genomics that help to shed light on the past peoples who created the archaeological landscape, and together lead to deeper insights into the population and cultural history of the Americas. A review of the ancient human genomic record sheds light on the peopling processes of the Americas.
Chapter
Being able to identify individual populations has long been of interest in archaeology, but within the last several decades it has become a specific focus as researchers have linked evolution-based theoretical models of cultural transmission with innovative analytical methods to better understand how groups of agents use culturally acquired information to navigate across fitness landscapes. Other animals learn, but humans have the unique ability to accumulate learned information rapidly and to pass it on to future generations. Nowhere is this interest in applying models of cultural transmission more evident than in the archaeology of the late Pleistocene colonization of North America, where researchers are beginning to identify distinct populations and to trace their movements across complex physical and cultural landscapes.
Article
Full-text available
Across Atlantic ice: the origin of America's Clovis culture (Stanford & Bradley 2012) is the latest iteration of a controversial proposal that North America was first colonised by people from Europe rather than from East Asia, as most researchers accept. The authors, Dennis Stanford and Bruce Bradley, argue that Solutrean groups from southern France and the Iberian Peninsula used watercraft to make their way across the North Atlantic and into North America during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). According to Stanford and Bradley, this 6000km journey was facilitated by a continuous ice shelf that provided fresh water and a food supply. Across Atlantic ice has received a number of positive reviews. Shea (2012: 294), for example, suggests that it is “an excellent example of hypothesis-building in the best tradition of processual archaeology. It challenges American archaeology in a way that will require serious research by its opponents”. Runnels (2012) is equally enthusiastic.
Book
Who are the Native Americans? When and how did they colonize the New World? What proportion of the biological variation in contemporary Amerindian populations was 'made in America' and what was brought from Siberia? This book is a unique synthesis of the genetic, archaeological and demographic evidence concerning the native peoples of the Americas, using case studies from contemporary Amerindian and Siberian indigenous groups to unravel the mysteries. It culminates in an examination of the devastating collision between European and Native American cultures following contact, and the legacy of increased incidence of chronic diseases that still accompanies the acculturation of native peoples today. This compelling account will be required reading for all those interested in the anthropology of Native Americans, past, present and future.
Article
Kennewick Man, referred to as the Ancient One by Native Americans, is a male human skeleton discovered in Washington state (USA) in 1996 and initially radiocarbon dated to 8,340-9,200 calibrated years before present (BP). His population affinities have been the subject of scientific debate and legal controversy. Based on an initial study of cranial morphology it was asserted that Kennewick Man was neither Native American nor closely related to the claimant Plateau tribes of the Pacific Northwest, who claimed ancestral relationship and requested repatriation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The morphological analysis was important to judicial decisions that Kennewick Man was not Native American and that therefore NAGPRA did not apply. Instead of repatriation, additional studies of the remains were permitted. Subsequent craniometric analysis affirmed Kennewick Man to be more closely related to circumpacific groups such as the Ainu and Polynesians than he is to modern Native Americans. In order to resolve Kennewick Man's ancestry and affiliations, we have sequenced his genome to ∼1× coverage and compared it to worldwide genomic data including for the Ainu and Polynesians. We find that Kennewick Man is closer to modern Native Americans than to any other population worldwide. Among the Native American groups for whom genome-wide data are available for comparison, several seem to be descended from a population closely related to that of Kennewick Man, including the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Colville), one of the five tribes claiming Kennewick Man. We revisit the cranial analyses and find that, as opposed to genome-wide comparisons, it is not possible on that basis to affiliate Kennewick Man to specific contemporary groups. We therefore conclude based on genetic comparisons that Kennewick Man shows continuity with Native North Americans over at least the last eight millennia.
Book
Who were the first humans to inhabit North America? According to the now familiar story, mammal hunters entered the continent some 12,000 years ago via a land bridge that spanned the Bering Sea. Distinctive stone tools belonging to the Clovis culture established the presence of these early New World people. But are the Clovis tools Asian in origin? Drawing from original archaeological analysis, paleoclimatic research, and genetic studies, noted archaeologists Dennis J. Stanford and Bruce A. Bradley challenge the old narrative and, in the process, counter traditional-and often subjective-approaches to archaeological testing for historical relatedness. The authors apply rigorous scholarship to a hypothesis that places the technological antecedents of Clovis in Europe and posits that the first Americans crossed the Atlantic by boat and arrived earlier than previously thought. Supplying archaeological and oceanographic evidence to support this assertion, the book dismantles the old paradigm while persuasively linking Clovis technology with the culture of the Solutrean people who occupied France and Spain more than 20,000 years ago. Who were the first humans to inhabit North America? According to the now familiar story, mammal hunters entered the continent some 12,000 years ago via a land bridge that spanned the Bering Sea. Distinctive stone tools belonging to the Clovis culture established the presence of these early New World people. But are the Clovis tools Asian in origin? Drawing from original archaeological analysis, paleoclimatic research, and genetic studies, noted archaeologists Dennis J. Stanford and Bruce A. Bradley challenge the old narrative and, in the process, counter traditional-and often subjective-approaches to archaeological testing for historical relatedness. The authors apply rigorous scholarship to a hypothesis that places the technological antecedents of Clovis in Europe and posits that the first Americans crossed the Atlantic by boat and arrived earlier than previously thought. Supplying archaeological and oceanographic evidence to support this assertion, the book dismantles the old paradigm while persuasively linking Clovis technology with the culture of the Solutrean people who occupied France and Spain more than 20,000 years ago.
Book
Who were the first humans to inhabit North America? According to the now familiar story, mammal hunters entered the continent some 12,000 years ago via a land bridge that spanned the Bering Sea. Distinctive stone tools belonging to the Clovis culture established the presence of these early New World people. But are the Clovis tools Asian in origin? Drawing from original archaeological analysis, paleoclimatic research, and genetic studies, noted archaeologists Dennis J. Stanford and Bruce A. Bradley challenge the old narrative and, in the process, counter traditional-and often subjective-approaches to archaeological testing for historical relatedness. The authors apply rigorous scholarship to a hypothesis that places the technological antecedents of Clovis in Europe and posits that the first Americans crossed the Atlantic by boat and arrived earlier than previously thought. Supplying archaeological and oceanographic evidence to support this assertion, the book dismantles the old paradigm while persuasively linking Clovis technology with the culture of the Solutrean people who occupied France and Spain more than 20,000 years ago.