Despite significant changes in International Relations (IR) in recent times, the study of the concept of security remains at the very core of the discipline. This is explained by several indicators, the most important being the development of security paradigms by nearly every recent approach to the study of IR, especially constructivism, critical geopolitics, postmodernism and historical
... [Show full abstract] sociology. Although these approaches have strongly criticized the idea of "state security" held by the realists, neo-realists and the neo-liberals, they have not been able to dilute the centrality of security in IR. Further, some of these approaches-most conspicuously the postmodernist and post-structuralist ones-have questioned the possibility of IR being an independent academic discipline in the first place, by refusing to criticize the epistemology that generates a whole series of binaries like inside/outside, hierarchy/anarchy, power/justice and state/community. Yet, even postmodernist and post-structuralist scholars acknowledged the importance of security studies. It is little wonder, therefore, that the mainstream IR theoretical paradigms like realism (and neo-realism) and neo-liberalism would contribute to the burgeoning literature on security. Thus, whether one takes into consideration the trends within the international system or the divergent theoretical perspectives to understand such trends, the centrality of security is evident.