Conference PaperPDF Available

THE COGNITIVE PROCESSING OF SYNTACTIC INFORMATION: A STUDY OF RELATIVE CLAUSES WITH SUBJECT AND OBJECT EXTRACTION IN SPANISH THE COGNITIVE PROCESSING OF SYNTACTIC INFORMATION: A STUDY OF RELATIVE CLAUSES WITH SUBJECT AND OBJECT EXTRACTION IN SPANISH

Authors:

Abstract

Syntax is responsible for restricting the word order of sentences and associating each possibility with a particular meaning. The aim of the present study was to investigate the processing of the syntactic components of sentences. Specifically, it focused on the comprehension of relative clauses in Spanish with null subject and object, distinguishing its various forms, in order to determine which syntactic factors (such as canonical order and syntactic marking) influence the semantic interpretation of such clauses, as well as the processing costs associated with them.. In general, these studies showed differences in the processing of S and O relatives, being O a more complex clause. The accumulated evidence points that difficulties in processing the O relative could be due to a combination of syntactic, functional, discursive, semantic and experience-based factors (the frequency of occurrence). To accomplish the present study's goals, three stages were conducted: an analysis of the frequency of occurrence of different structures in a corpus of local language and two experimental tests: one on spontaneous comprehension (allocation of thematic roles) and one with a timed multiple choice task. This allowed us to identify canonical order and subject extraction as the main syntactic factors that influence the correct comprehension of such sentences. ABSTRACT Syntax is responsible for restricting the word order of sentences and associating each possibility with a particular meaning. The aim of the present study was to investigate the processing of the syntactic components of sentences. Specifically, it focused on the comprehension of relative clauses in Spanish with null subject and object, distinguishing its various forms, in order to determine which syntactic factors (such as canonical order and syntactic marking) influence the semantic interpretation of such clauses, as well as the processing costs associated with them.. In general, these studies showed differences in the processing of S and O relatives, being O a more complex clause. The accumulated evidence points that difficulties in processing the O relative could be due to a combination of syntactic, functional, discursive, semantic and experience-based factors (the frequency of occurrence). To accomplish the present study's goals, three stages were conducted: an analysis of the frequency of occurrence of different structures in a corpus of local language and two experimental tests: one on spontaneous comprehension (allocation of thematic roles) and one with a timed multiple choice task. This allowed us to identify canonical order and subject extraction as the main syntactic factors that influence the correct comprehension of such sentences. Stage 2: Spontaneous comprehension without time limitation (offline data) Methodology:




 !"#!$ %&!'$(!$""$"!$'"$))!("$*!$%+
ABSTRACT
Syntax is responsible for restricting theword order of sentences and associating each possibility witha particular meaning. The
aim of the present study was to investigate the processing of the syntactic components of sentences. Specifically, it focused on
the comprehension of relative clauses in Spanish with null subject and object, distinguishing its various forms, in order to
determinewhich syntactic factors (such as canonical order and syntactic marking)influence the semantic interpretation of such
clauses, as well as the processing costs associated with them.
This field was studied in several languages: English (e.g. Fodor, Bever, & Garrett, 1974; Wanner & Maratsos, 1978; King, & Just,
1991), French (Frauenfelder, Segui & Mehler, 1980) and Spanish (Hoover, 1992; Betancort, Carreiras & Sturt, 2009, del Río et
al., 2012), etc. In general, these studies showed differences in the processing of S and O relatives, being O a more complex
clause. The accumulated evidence points that difficulties in processing the O relative could be due to a combination of syntactic,
functional, discursive, semantic and experience-based factors (the frequency of occurrence).
To accomplish the present study’s goals, three stages were conducted: an analysis of the frequency of occurrence of different
structures in a corpus of local language and two experimental tests: one on spontaneous comprehension (allocation
ofthematicroles) and one with a timed multiple choice task. This allowed us to identifycanonical order and subject extractionas
the main syntactic factors that influence the correctcomprehension of such sentences.
ABSTRACT
Syntax is responsible for restricting theword order of sentences and associating each possibility witha particular meaning. The
aim of the present study was to investigate the processing of the syntactic components of sentences. Specifically, it focused on
the comprehension of relative clauses in Spanish with null subject and object, distinguishing its various forms, in order to
determinewhich syntactic factors (such as canonical order and syntactic marking)influence the semantic interpretation of such
clauses, as well as the processing costs associated with them.
This field was studied in several languages: English (e.g. Fodor, Bever, & Garrett, 1974; Wanner & Maratsos, 1978; King, & Just,
1991), French (Frauenfelder, Segui & Mehler, 1980) and Spanish (Hoover, 1992; Betancort, Carreiras & Sturt, 2009, del Río et
al., 2012), etc. In general, these studies showed differences in the processing of S and O relatives, being O a more complex
clause. The accumulated evidence points that difficulties in processing the O relative could be due to a combination of syntactic,
functional, discursive, semantic and experience-based factors (the frequency of occurrence).
To accomplish the present study’s goals, three stages were conducted: an analysis of the frequency of occurrence of different
structures in a corpus of local language and two experimental tests: one on spontaneous comprehension (allocation
ofthematicroles) and one with a timed multiple choice task. This allowed us to identifycanonical order and subject extractionas
the main syntactic factors that influence the correctcomprehension of such sentences.
Stage 2: Spontaneous comprehension without time limitation (offline data)
Methodology:
Participants: 43 subjects with technical or university studies, aged 23 to 68 years old (M= 32 years old).
Material.,-'$)$.$'/)0+#/$"$."$)$#.."#%))0$1($)$#')"+.)+"$'0$
.0'$ 2$"3' /$"$ )"')2$' ' )0) )0$ %$)   )0$ '$)$.$ .+# 3$ $)0$"   )0$ +'
4"$'$)$#
Design and procedure. )"+.)+"$ )54$ /'  )$"'+36$.) 2"3$ 0$ ( #$4$#$) 2"3$
/')0$$"""'7+))5)0$)'8!$.0'$)$.$44$"$#+(3$"$# "(9),-#+#$"$.0
$!)0$7+$'):/0##/0))/0(;</'4+) /$#35#)$).(4$)$)0$'/$"
Stage 3: Visual comprehension with timed multiple choice task (online data)
($ .)"/')"#+.$#(+)4$.0.$)'8"#$")$2+)$/0$)0$")0$
"$'+)' +#)%$,/$"$)0$'($")
Methodology:
Participants.,=')+#$)'#%"#+)$' .+)##$'.%>!!%$#9-)
?,5$"'#@A,?5$"'#B$ )0$(4").4)$#)0$4"$2+'')+#5
Material. 0$ '($ ,- '$)$.$'   )%$ , /$"$ +'$# " $.0   )0$(! )0$ )/
4''3$'/$"'))0$7+$'):/0##/0))/0(;</$"$4"$'$)$#
Design and procedure. )"+.)+"$ )54$ /'  )$"'+36$.) 2"3$ 0$ (
#$4$#$)2"3$/')0$$"""'7+))5 )/"$@"')$"C"')$"!,DD?B
/')0$)+'$# ")0$4"$'$))#$"""#$)$.)
RESULTS
2+$'32$,DDDD('#.""$.).0.$'$$.)/$"$.'#$"$#$"""'
)$"""4$".$)%$,?E@9=?$"""'B
Obtained data showed the following sequence, from easier to more complex structure
E1 > E5 > E4 > E3 >E2
Stage 1:  5''   )0$ 4"4'$# ')"+.)+"$' "$7+$.5   ..+""$.$  ."4+'   . %+%$ /' #$  "#$" )
$2+)$4''3$ +$.$ )0' .)". Material:$2$"'."4+' .$/'44$"8/'*#$)$""@1
( /"#'! 3+) 35 )0$  )+" %+%$ ".$''% "+4! 2$"'## . #$ &"#3! !"%$)B
Procedure: "40').). *$" "$$% ?9 /' +'$# @)'$"'! ''! ($$'! *F$*! #"& C #"&! ,DDGB
Results: "$7+$.5 ..+""$.$'0/')0$ /%'$7+$.$! "(("$"$.+""$))$''"$.+""$)')"+.)+"$E1 > E4 > E3
> E5H/0$"$,.)3$.)$##+$)())' )0$+)().*$"
CONCLUSIONS
0$ "$'+)' 3)$# ."'' )0$ )0"$$ $I4$"($) ')%$' "$2$  .$") ..#$.$! /0.0 $# ) )08% )0) )0$ ("$ "$7+$)  ')"+.)+"$ '! )0$ ("$
..$''3$#!.'$7+$.$!)0$$'$")+#$"')#).3$/$2$"!)%$94"$'$)'()$"())'').)#')%J'0)"+.)+"$9 "()"+.)+"$
,##)!# $"$.$' +#3$)/$$)%$9#)%$',#?!/+')3$$2$)0) "$7+$.5 ..+""$.$'))0$(.+'$!")0$5$!)0)
(8$'.(4"$0$'$'$"0$"$ "$!4"33').$I4)'"$)$+%0)6+') 5)0$.0.$ .$")')"+.)+"$'"$2$"! "$7+$.5.+#3$)0+%0) 
'.'$7+$.$!("$)0.+'$!  .))
0$')"+.)+"$''0/%$''# .+)$'/$"$ST1 (“La niña que mira al hombre…”) and ST4 (“La niña que el hombre mira…”), while the more complex was ST2
(“La niña que mira el hombre…”)0'(53$$I4$#'.'$7+$.$ $.$''"5#+3$4".$''%,!/0$"$ "()(+')3$"$2$/$# )$"
"')+')' 5%"$'+),"$7+"$'"$"%*) $I. "()) "')!)44$"')3$ /%."$($)"#$"/0.03$.($'2#.$)0$
'$.#+44$"')0$"$)2$+36$.)4.$
$%"#% .)" .))!#)3)$#)%$',#?"$2$$#)0))0$ .)"'/0.0/3$))$".(4"$0$' ")0$'$)54$ '$)$.$'"$+36$.)
I)".)! . "#$" # ."$($) +"'$ @ /0.0 $.0 $$($) ' 4.$#  "#$"   44$".$  )0$ ')"+.)+"$! /)0+) +")0$" ''+$' # K.'%
'5)I3I$'LB0$.(4"%+36$.)#36$.)$I)".)!)0$ "')$4"2$#)3$$'$")+#$"')#)0)0$'$.#$0$'$"$'+)'"$.."#.$
/)0#) +#"+$ $#$"!$%+C$0$"@9M-DB"$.0HN%C+')@9MM9B%'0H$).")$)@,DDMB##$>$)@,D9,B4'0/$2$"!
)L').$3$)0)O!36$.)"$)2$'$)$.$!4"$'$)$#$"""')%$,#2$"5/4$".$)%$)%$?0' .)$#'))08%)0)I)".)
.)"')'#$)$"()'."#$" .)"!/0.0'$$(')3$)0$(')"$$2)'.$)''+"$'$4".$''% )0$$$($)' +.)'0$)
/$#!'5).). +.).)"$(''+'4$'$# "()0')3$"$)$#'0"))$"(($("5+)).3$4.$#')' 5%'5).).#
'$().4')0'(4$'$I)"4".$''%.')#.""$')0$4''3)5 .+""%.(4"$0$'$"""'3$)/$$
.."#%))0$"$'+)'!)0$(')..+")$4$"'4$.)2$ "$I4%)0$'$8# ')"+.)+"$'"$)0$"$'+".$P3'$#44".0$'!3'$# +.) .)"''+.0'
"$'+".$())'#.%)2$)$%")())'" ').$! $4$#$.5 .)50$"5 @B @3'! ,DDDH "#$"C3'!,DD1B4"$''+($')0)
36$.)"$)2$'"$("$.')53$.+'$)0$"$L'0%0$"(+) )$(4"5.(4$)$#$4$#$.$'/0.0"$')".)3)0')"%$#)$%")"$'+".$').
' 3$ $I4$# '  .'$7+$.$   )0$ "$#$" 02% ) .0%$ )' 4"$'4$.)2$ "( ) %$)  )0$ "') )$"4"$)) @.'')$) /)0 .. "#$" 
%+%$'8$4'0"%'0B))0$P.."#$" )0$36$.)"$)2$@#$>!&4$*P%$'C")>P"%$'$'!,D9,H.0$5C$0!9M--BQ
')! 3+) ) $')! $/ $I4$"($)' /0$"$ $.0 .)"'$2+)$# '$4")$5 02$ 3$$ .'#$"$#  "#$" ).."+$ ("$ $2#$.$ # '4$. 5 )0$ 4").+"
$ $.)' $.0$
REFERENCES ""$!@,D9?B 4$"'4$.)2)$%"# #$ 4".$'($)5 #7+'.&#$$%+6$ %+' .'$.+$.'4" $ .0$.5 $2@.(4B'.%J>'). $ $'4R($6$+ $%+!44OMP1-+$'
"$'#$."$)">#$+3..$'#$.+)##$' >5$)"'#$2$"'###$+$'"$'H#$>!C&4$*P%+$'!@,DDGB $.)'#$($("4$")25#$+."%#$4".$'($)$.(4"$'&#$".$''.&%.!,=!
=MPM1 #$>! !&4$*P%$'! ! C ")>P"%$'$'!  @,D9,B./"# "#$" #)$" $"$.$P3'$# )$%").')' #+"% '$)$.$ .(4"$0$'0$ .'$  4'0 '+36$.) #36$.) "$)2$ .+'$' S+")$"5+"   I4$"($)
'5.0%5!G1!,9D-T,9,-H$5!@,D9OB"$7+$.5 $.)'36$.)$)2$+'$".$''%($2#$.$2" '%$P'$#..+)'%+%$$"%GO@?B!G-1T=9OH$).")!!""$"'!!C)+")!@,DDMB0$4".$''% '+36$.)
#36$.)"$)2$.+'$'4'0$5$P)".8%')+#5S+")$"5+" I4$"($)'5.0%5!G,!9M91T9M,M
daicesaretti@gmail.com
ST Extra
ction
CO SM Example
S O Yes No Yes No
1 X X X La niña que mira al hombre cruza la calle [The
little girl looking man crossing the street.]
2 X X X La niña que mira el hombre cruza la calle [The
little girl looking man crossing the street.]
3 X X X La niña a la que mira el hombre cruza la calle
[The little girl who looks at the man across the
street.].
4 X X X La niña que el hombre mira cruza la calle. [The
little girl looking man crosses the street.].
5 X X X La niña a la que el hombre mira cruza la calle.
[The little girl who looks man crosses the street.]
RESULTS
$'."4)2$ 5''   $"""' '0/$#  )) $""" 4$".$)%$   O!9E @OM $"""'B " 
2$')"+.)+"$'
3)$# #) '0/$# )0$ /% '$7+$.$! "( $'$" ) ("$ .(4$I ')"+.)+"$
E4 > E1> E5 > E3 > E2
RESULTS
$'."4)2$ 5''   $"""' '0/$#  )) $""" 4$".$)%$   O!9E @OM $"""'B " 
2$')"+.)+"$'
3)$# #) '0/$# )0$ /% '$7+$.$! "( $'$" ) ("$ .(4$I ')"+.)+"$
E4 > E1> E5 > E3 > E2
Figure 1: Error % by structure –Stage 2
Figure 1: Error % by structure –Stage 2
Figure 2"""E35 .)"T)%$,
Figure 2"""E35 .)"T)%$,
Table 1: Description of each structure (ST) by factor
Figure 3: Error % by structure – Stage 3.
Figure 3: Error % by structure – Stage 3.
Figure 4: Error % by factor – Stage 3
Figure 4: Error % by factor – Stage 3
D
,
O
G
-
9D
9,
9O
9G
9-
,D
,,
0,66
19,77
5,23
0
1,16
Structures
% Errors
D
1
9D
91
,D
,1
?D
?1
OD
O1
1D
7,4
38,4
12,6
O-!G
31
19,6
Factors
% Errors
D
1
9D
91
,D
,1
?D
?1
OD
O1
1D
11
6
1D
22,5
17,5 16
Structures
% Errors
D
9
,
?
O
1
G
=
-
M
9D
99
9,
9?
9O
91
3,04
14
6,61
10,36
6,43
12,32
FACT ORS
% Errors
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
The processing difficulty of nested grammatical structure has been explained by different psycholinguistic theories. Here I provide corpus and behavioral evidence in favor of usage-based models, focusing on the case of object relative clauses in Spanish as a first language. A corpus analysis of spoken Spanish reveals that, as in English, the overwhelming majority of object relative clauses are pronominal. Spanish allows flexibility of order of surface constituents within the clause. The corpus data revealed significant asymmetries in the frequency of order of surface constituents in pronominal and nonpronominal object relative clauses. Two offline rating tasks and one self-paced reading task were next conducted, showing that complexity judgments and reading processing data mirrored the fine-grained distributional patterns revealed by the corpus analysis. I conclude that frequent object relative clauses may become easier to process as a consequence of use and repetition, and I discuss the implications of these findings for usage-based models of language representation and access.
Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: The case of Spanish subject and object relative clauses
  • L M S References Correa
  • D Del Río
  • R López-Higues
REFERENCES Correa, L. M. S. (2013). Una perspectiva integrada del procesamiento y la adquisición del lenguaje: algunas consecuencias para el TEL. En Jaichenco y Sevilla (comp.): Psicolingüística en español. Homenaje a Juan Segui, pp 49-58. Buenos Aires.Ed: Secretaría de Publicaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad de Buenos Aires.; del Río, D.& López-Higues, R. (2006). Efectos de la memoria operativa y de una carga de procesamiento en la comprensión de oraciones.Psicológica, 27, 79-95 del Río, D., López-Higes, R., & Martín-Aragoneses, M. T. (2012). Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: The case of Spanish subject and object relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2108-2128;