Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Case
study
Metallurgical
investigation
of
wire
breakage
of
tyre
bead
grade
Piyas
Palit
*
,
Souvik
Das,
Jitendra
Mathur
R&D
and
Scientific
Services,
Tata
Steel
Limited,
Jamshedpur
831
001,
India
1.
Introduction
Tyre
bead
grade
with
Cu-coating
was
conventionally
used
for
tyre
making
application
[1].
During
tyre
making
operation
at
tyre
manufacturer
company,
wire
failed
frequently
during
bending
operation
at
brittle
manner.
During
bending
operation
such
kind
of
breaking
was
also
happened
at
wire
mill.
Different
breakages
as
well
as
defective
samples
have
been
collected
from
different
coils.
The
wire
manufactured
by
drawing
process
from
5.5
mm
wire
rod
[2,3].
Two
stage
of
drawing
process
is
involved
to
making
of
final
wire.
After
the
drawing
operation
stress
reliving
and
Cu–Sn
coating
of
wire
was
carried.
The
process
details
are
mentioned
in
Fig.
1.
2.
Visual
observation
Two
pieces
of
breakage
wire
samples
were
collected
from
the
drawing
mill
for
investigations.
The
samples
were
cleaned
with
acetone
to
remove
dirt
for
visual
examination
prior
to
metallographic
sample
preparation.
Visual
examination
is
carried
out
in
stereoscope.
Surface
appearance
of
the
defects
in
all
wire
samples
was
of
similar
in
nature.
The
fracture
surface
revealed
finger
nail
type
(Figs.
4
and
5).
Crow
feet
like
defects
including
button
like
surface
abnormalities
were
observed
on
Case
Studies
in
Engineering
Failure
Analysis
4
(2015)
83–87
A
R
T
I
C
L
E
I
N
F
O
Article
history:
Received
22
July
2015
Received
in
revised
form
24
September
2015
Accepted
29
September
2015
Available
online
13
October
2015
Keywords:
Tyre
bead
grade
Button
like
defect
Surface
martensite
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
Tyre
bead
grade
wire
is
used
for
tyre
making
application.
The
wire
is
used
as
reinforcement
inside
the
polymer
of
tyre.
The
wire
is
available
in
different
size/section
such
as
1.6–
0.80
mm
thin
Cu
coated
wire.
During
tyre
making
operation
at
tyre
manufacturer
company,
wire
failed
frequently.
In
this
present
study,
different
broken/defective
wire
samples
were
collected
from
wire
mill
for
detailed
investigation
of
the
defect.
The
natures
of
the
defects
were
localized
and
similar
in
nature.
The
fracture
surface
was
of
finger
nail
type.
Crow
feet
like
defects
including
button
like
surface
abnormalities
were
also
observed
on
the
broken
wire
samples.
The
defect
was
studied
at
different
directions
under
microscope.
Different
advanced
metallographic
techniques
have
been
used
for
detail
investigation.
The
analysis
revealed
that,
white
layer
of
surface
martensite
was
formed
and
it
caused
the
final
breakage
of
wire.
In
this
present
study
we
have
also
discussed
about
the
possible
reason
for
the
formation
of
such
kind
of
surface
martensite
(hard-phase).
Published
by
Elsevier
Ltd.
This
is
an
open
access
article
under
the
CC
BY
license
(http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
*
Corresponding
author
at:
Metallurgical
Laboratories
and
QA
Group,
R&D
and
Scientific
Services,
Tata
Steel
Limited,
Jamshedpur
831
001,
India.
Tel.:
+91
7033094767.
E-mail
address:
piyas.palit@tatasteel.com
(P.
Palit).
Contents
lists
available
at
ScienceDirect
Case
Studies
in
Engineering
Failure
Analysis
jo
ur
n
al
ho
m
ep
ag
e:
ww
w.els
evier
.c
om
/lo
cat
e/c
s
efa
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2015.09.003
2213-2902/Published
by
Elsevier
Ltd.
This
is
an
open
access
article
under
the
CC
BY
license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
the
broken
wire
samples.
The
defect
was
observed
near
the
fracture
end
and
which
was
very
much
localized
in
nature
(Figs.
2
and
3).
3.
Chemical
analysis
Chemical
analysis
of
wire
samples
was
carried
out
using
combustion
infrared
technique
(LECO,
TC600)
for
carbon
and
sulphur
contents.
An
inductively
coupled
plasma
atomic
emission
spectroscopy
(ICP-AES)
instrument
was
used
to
determine
amounts
of
rest
of
the
elements.
The
chemistry
of
wire
sample
confirmed
to
high
carbon
steel
grade
(C-70).
Chemical
analysis
result
is
presented
in
Table
1.
4.
Metallography
analysis
4.1.
Microstructural
analysis
Micro
specimens
were
prepared
from
the
fractured
end
as
well
as
defect
location
of
wire
samples
for
conducting
light
optical
microscopic
examination
and
scanning
electron
microscopy
(SEM).
These
samples
were
individually
mounted
in
conductive
mounting
and
polished
by
conventional
metallographic
techniques
for
scratch
free
surface.
The
polished
samples
were
etched
in
3%
nital
solution
(3
mL
HNO
3
in
97
mL
ethyl
alcohol),
and
both
un-etched
and
etched
samples
were
examined
in
a
light
microscope
to
observe
microstructural
constituents.
Un-etched
sample
shows
surface
defect
in
longitudinal
as
well
in
transverses
direction
(Figs.
6
and
8).
Etched
microstructure
of
the
longitudinal
samples
revealed
presence
of
brown
layer
near
the
defect
location.
The
thickness
of
the
brown
layer
is
around
30–40
m
m
(Fig.
7).
From
microstructure
analysis
the
brown
layer
appeared
to
be
of
martensite
(which
was
further
verified
by
micro
hardness
value
and
SEM
analysis;
Table
2).
Severe
grain
flow
was
observed
along
the
defect
location.
The
microstructure
of
the
matrix
revealed
cold
drawn
pearlite
structure
(Figs.
9–11).
Wire Rod (
5.5 mm
Dia.
)
Pick
le; phosphate
& bora
x
Dry Drawing
Operat
ion
(2.20 mm
in
7 passes)
Use
of
p
owder
lubrica
nt
Stre
ss Relieving
Coating (Cu-Sn)
Wet Drawin
g Ope
ration
(0.8mm
in
11 passes)
Use of
li
q
uid lubricant
Fig.
1.
Flow
diagram
of
wire
rod
to
wire
drawing
process.
Figs.
2–5.
(2,
3)
Closer
view
of
surface
defects
of
failed
wire
samples
#1.
(4,
5)
Closer
view
of
surface
defects
of
failed
wire
samples
#2.
P.
Palit
et
al.
/
Case
Studies
in
Engineering
Failure
Analysis
4
(2015)
83–87
84
4.2.
Micro
hardness
test
The
micro
hardness
of
different
phases
observed
in
the
broken
wire
samples
was
determined
in
a
pneumatically
controlled
automatic
micro
hardness
tester
(Leco-LM247AT).
An
applied
load
of
50
gf
was
used
during
testing,
and
several
indentations
were
made
to
determine
the
hardness
of
different
phases
(Fig.
12).
The
average
hardness
of
the
matrix
is
about
461
HV,
and
the
average
hardness
value
of
the
brown
phase
is
about
624
HV
(Table
2).
4.3.
EDS
analysis
EDS
analysis
was
carried
out
in
the
as
received
sample
to
find
out
the
elemental
difference
between
parent
and
the
defect
region
(Fig.
13).
EDS
analysis
reveals
presence
of
tungsten
(W)
in
the
martensite
region
in
concentration
of
more
than
2%
as
shown
in
Table
3.
As
the
element
is
not
contained
in
bulk,
which
indicates
that
the
material
transfers
between
the
mating
bodies
i.e.
an
intense
adhesive
sliding
wear.
Other
elements
remains
almost
constant
indicate
that
martensitic
transformation
took
place
due
to
thermal
effect
with
rapid
quenching
of
local
austenite
produced
by
friction
[4].
5.
Discussions
Premature
wire
failures
were
observed
during
bending
operation
before
tyre
making
process.
The
nature
of
the
defects
was
of
similar
type
in
all
the
failed
samples.
The
fracture
surface
was
of
finger
nail
type.
Crow
feet
like
defects
including
button
like
surface
abnormalities
were
observed
on
the
broken
wire
samples.
The
surface
defect
was
observed
near
the
Table
1
Chemical
analysis
result
of
wire
samples
(wt.%).
Spec
Chemistry
Section
(mm)
C
Mn
S
P
Si
Cr
N
2
(ppm)
Wire
sample
1
0.69
0.66
0.012
0.019
0.18
0.01
33
1.6
Wire
sample
2
0.71
0.69
0.013
0.022
0.21
0.01
41
0.8
Figs.
6
and
7.
(6)
Un-etched
micrograph
of
the
cross
section
of
the
defect
location
in
longitudinal
micro
specimen.
(7)
Etched
microstructure
of
the
same.
Table
2
Micro
hardness
test
result.
Sample
no.
Parent
phase
(HV
50
gf)
Brown
phase
(HV
50
gf)
1
470,460
667,663
2
452,462
660,625
Table
3
EDS
analysis.
Location
Si
Mn
W
Fe
Martensite
(1)
0.30
0.87
2.19
96.64
Matrix
(2)
0.38
0.91
–
98.71
P.
Palit
et
al.
/
Case
Studies
in
Engineering
Failure
Analysis
4
(2015)
83–87
85
fracture
end
and
in
localized
manner.
Etched
microstructure
of
the
longitudinal
samples
revealed
presence
of
brown
layer
near
the
defect
location.
The
thickness
of
the
brown
layer
is
around
30–40
m
m.
From
microstructure
analysis
the
brown
layer
appeared
to
be
of
martensite
(which
was
further
verified
by
micro
hardness
value
and
SEM
analysis).
Severe
grain
flow
was
observed
along
the
defect
location.
The
microstructure
of
the
matrix
revealed
cold
drawn
pearlite
structure.
The
average
hardness
of
the
matrix
is
about
460
HV,
and
the
average
hardness
value
of
the
brown
phase
is
around
650
HV.
This
type
of
layer
is
generated
during
wire
drawing
due
to
lack
of
lubrication
as
no
segregation
was
observed
[4].
The
martensite
layer
which
forms
a
brown
layer
in
the
surface
is
very
brittle
in
nature
(high
hardness).
This
surface
martensite
helps
to
propagate
cracks
from
the
pearlite–martensite
interface
and
which
leads
to
failure
during
drawing
or
its
successive
operations.
The
martensite
formed
in
the
surface
is
a
thermal
phenomenon
generated
during
friction
causes
surface
temperature
rise
followed
by
rapid
cooling
due
to
mass
effect
of
bulk.
EDS
analysis
reveals
presence
of
tungsten
(W)
in
the
martensite
region
in
concentration
of
more
than
2%
as
the
element
is
not
contained
in
bulk,
which
indicates
that
the
material
transfers
between
Figs.
8–11.
(8)
Un-etched
micrograph
of
the
top
view
of
the
defect
in
longitudinal
micro
specimen
at
50
magnification.
(9)
Etched
microstructure
of
the
same
at
200
magnification
revealed
martensite
at
the
defect
location.
(Top
view
of
the
defect;
etched
after
marginal
polishing
of
surface.)
(10,
11)
Martensite
at
higher
magnification
under
SEM.
Fig.
12.
Etched
microstructure
of
the
defect
location
showing
indentation
in
the
brown
layer
(surface
martensite)
and
the
drawn
pearlite
matrix.
P.
Palit
et
al.
/
Case
Studies
in
Engineering
Failure
Analysis
4
(2015)
83–87
86
the
mating
bodies
i.e.
an
intense
adhesive
sliding
wear.
The
martensite
formed
in
the
surface
was
generated
during
drawing
process
probably
due
to
lack
of
localize
lubrication
[5].
Due
to
improper
lubrication,
during
drawing
of
high
carbon
wires
sometimes
temperature
reaches
up
to
austenitic
range
due
to
heat
generated,
because
of
plastic
deformation
and
friction
between
wire
and
die
[6].
6.
Conclusion
Presence
of
martensite
(hard
phase)
in
the
surface
of
the
wire
samples
caused
breakage
during
drawing.
It
could
be
envisaged
from
the
surface
characteristics
and
microstructure
vis-a
`
-vis
the
occurrence
of
failure
that
the
hard-phase
generated
during
drawing
due
to
improper
lubrication.
References
[1]
Das
S,
Koli
P,
Mathur
J,
Dey
A,
Bhattacharyya
T,
Bhattacharyya
S.
Failure
analysis
of
motor
tyre
bead
wires
during
torsion
test.
J
Fail
Anal
Prev
2013;
684–8.
[2]
Lankford
Jr
WT,
Samways
,
Craven
,
McGannon
,
editors.
The
manufacture
of
steel
wire
and
steel
wire
products.
The
making,
shaping
and
treating
of
steel.
10th
ed.,
Pittsburgh,
PA:
United
States
Steel;
1985.
p.
961–1016.
[3]
Sharp
GA.
Steel
wire
for
ropes.
In:
Dove
,
editor.
Steel
wire
handbook,
vol.
3.
Branford,
CT:
The
Wire
Association
Inc.;
1972.
p.
77–94.
[4]
Sipos
K,
Lopez
M,
Trucco
M.
Surface
martensite
white
layer
produced
by
adhesive
sliding
wear
friction
in
AISI
1065
steel.
Rev
Latinoam
Metal
Mater
2008;28(1):46–50.
[5]
Das
S,
Mathur
J,
Bhattacharyya
T,
Bhattacharyya
S.
Metallurgical
investigation
of
different
causes
of
center
bursting
led
to
wire
breakage
during
production.
Case
Study
Eng
Fail
Anal
2013;1:32–6.
[6]
Haddi
A,
Imad
A,
Vega
G.
Analysis
of
temperature
and
speed
effects
on
the
drawing
stress
for
improving
the
wire
drawing
process.
Mater
Des
2011;32(September
(8–9)):4310–5.
Fig.
13.
SEM
image
of
defect
sample
in
as
received
condition.
P.
Palit
et
al.
/
Case
Studies
in
Engineering
Failure
Analysis
4
(2015)
83–87
87