ArticlePublisher preview available

Is Spending Money on Others Good for Your Heart?

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Objective: Does spending money on others (prosocial spending) improve the cardiovascular health of community-dwelling older adults diagnosed with high blood pressure? Method: In Study 1, 186 older adults diagnosed with high blood pressure participating in the Midlife in the U.S. Study (MIDUS) were examined. In Study 2, 73 older adults diagnosed with high blood pressure were assigned to spend money on others or to spend money on themselves. Results: In Study 1, the more money people spent on others, the lower their blood pressure was 2 years later. In Study 2, participants who were assigned to spend money on others for 3 consecutive weeks subsequently exhibited lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to participants assigned to spend money on themselves. The magnitude of these effects was comparable to the effects of interventions such as antihypertensive medication or exercise. Conclusions: Together, these findings suggest that spending money on others shapes cardiovascular health, thereby providing a pathway by which prosocial behavior improves physical health among at-risk older adults. (PsycINFO Database Record
Is Spending Money on Others Good for Your Heart?
Ashley V. Whillans, Elizabeth W. Dunn,
and Gillian M. Sandstrom
University of British Columbia
Sally S. Dickerson
University of California, Irvine
Kenneth M. Madden
University of British Columbia
Objective: Does spending money on others (prosocial spending) improve the cardiovascular health of
community-dwelling older adults diagnosed with high blood pressure? Method: In Study 1, 186 older
adults diagnosed with high blood pressure participating in the Midlife in the U.S. Study (MIDUS) were
examined. In Study 2, 73 older adults diagnosed with high blood pressure were assigned to spend money
on others or to spend money on themselves. Results: In Study 1, the more money people spent on others,
the lower their blood pressure was 2 years later. In Study 2, participants who were assigned to spend
money on others for 3 consecutive weeks subsequently exhibited lower systolic and diastolic blood
pressure compared to participants assigned to spend money on themselves. The magnitude of these
effects was comparable to the effects of interventions such as antihypertensive medication or exercise.
Conclusions: Together, these findings suggest that spending money on others shapes cardiovascular
health, thereby providing a pathway by which prosocial behavior improves physical health among at-risk
older adults.
Keywords: health, life experiences, prosocial behavior, social behavior, well being
Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000332.supp
Can spending money on others improve physical health? Recent
research suggests that spending money on others improves emo-
tional well-being (e.g., Dunn, Aknin, & Norton, 2008; see Dunn,
Aknin, & Norton, 2014 for a review). Indeed, the happiness
benefits of spending on others (“prosocial spending”) have been
documented in rich and poor countries around the world, from
Canada and the United States to Uganda and India (Aknin,
Barrington-Leigh, et al., 2013). There has been less research
examining whether prosocial spending can affect physical health.
There is some evidence that generous or stingy economic decisions
may have downstream consequences for cortisol, a hormone that is
implicated in the stress response (Dunn, Ashton-James, Hanson, &
Aknin, 2010). However, research in this area has not yet explored
whether prosocial spending leads to clinically relevant health
benefits. Given that heart disease is the leading cause of death
worldwide, and that high blood pressure puts people at a higher
risk of a heart attack, this article focused on examining whether
prosocial spending reduces blood pressure among at-risk older
adults.
Providing indirect support for this hypothesis, correlational and
longitudinal research suggests that individuals who provide help to
others exhibit a reduced risk of mortality and better overall health
(e.g., Brown, Consedine, & Magai, 2005;Brown et al., 2009;
Piliavin & Siegl, 2007;Poulin, Brown, Dillard, & Smith, 2013; see
Konrath & Brown, 2013 for a recent review). Helping others can
take multiple forms, such as providing informal support to friends
and family and participating in formal volunteer work (Tilly &
Tilly, 1992;Wilson & Musick, 1997). In a ground breaking lon-
gitudinal study, researchers found that providing social support
was associated with a decreased risk of mortality among older
adults (Brown, Nesse, Vinokur, & Smith, 2003). Similarly, people
who volunteered at least four hours per week were less likely to
develop high blood pressure four years later (Sneed & Cohen,
This article was published Online First February 11, 2016.
Ashley V. Whillans, Elizabeth W. Dunn, and Gillian M. Sandstrom,
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia; Sally S. Dick-
erson, Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of
California, Irvine; Kenneth M. Madden, Department of Medicine, Univer-
sity of British Columbia.
Gillian M. Sandstrom is now at Department of Psychology, the Univer-
sity of Essex. Sally S. Dickerson is now at Department of Psychology, Pace
University.
We thank Shirley Bi, Meghan Buckley, Sarah Cheung, Eva Gifford,
Chris Gorczynski, Kiran Kalkat, Jenny Lee, Leah Marks, Jacob Sussman,
Carly Thornton, and Brittany VanSchagan for their assistance with data
collection, and Haiyun Liang for assistance with data management. This
research was supported by Canadian Institute for Health Research Grant
MOP-110968, a University of British Columbia Graduate Research Award
awarded to A.W., and a doctoral fellowship from the Social Sciences and
Humanities Research Council of Canada. This work was completed in part
while Sally Dickerson was serving at the National Science Foundation.
Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in
this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
views of the National Science Foundation.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ashley V.
Whillans, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia,
2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, 604-220-7975. E-mail:
ashleywhillans@psych.ubc.ca
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Health Psychology © 2016 American Psychological Association
2016, Vol. 35, No. 6, 574–583 0278-6133/16/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000332
574
... For example, Best and Freund (2021) considered donating behaviors, particularly its nonmonetary form, and generativity as aspects of the prosociality concept (20). However, some researchers, such as Whillans et al. (2016), focused on the financial dimension of the prosociality concept (21). Some studies have addressed volunteering as a planned prosocial behavior in older adults (16,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). ...
... For example, Best and Freund (2021) considered donating behaviors, particularly its nonmonetary form, and generativity as aspects of the prosociality concept (20). However, some researchers, such as Whillans et al. (2016), focused on the financial dimension of the prosociality concept (21). Some studies have addressed volunteering as a planned prosocial behavior in older adults (16,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). ...
... Tangible support includes two dimensions: financial and instrumental support (54). Financial support is defined as donating or lending money to close others in times of need (8,21,45,47,51,(54)(55)(56). Instrumental support is defined as behaviors that provide physical or material assistance to those in need (45,47,51,54,(57)(58)(59)(60). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify various aspects and dimensions of the prosociality concept in later life as an important concept that gains significance in people as they age. This concept has been expressed through a variety of dimensions in different studies. Method : This is a scoping review of the relevant literature on the concept of prosociality and its dimensions in later life, including quantitative and qualitative studies. The required data were collected from Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases between the years 1987 and 2022. Results: First, 877 articles were identified, and after the screening phase, 57 eligible studies were reviewed. Two main categories, prosocial dispositions and prosocial behaviors, and seven subcategories were extracted. The subcategories of prosocial dispositions include empathy, prosocial norms, innate tendencies, and generative desires. Prosocial behaviors subcategories include informal spontaneous helping, formal planned helping, and pro-environmental behaviors. Conclusion: The various aspects and dimensions of the prosociality concept in later life identified in this study can be used as a basis for assessing and planning the promotion of prosociality among older adults.
... Prosocial behavior has numerous effects on givers' emotional and physical well-being (reviewed in Curry et al., 2018;Hui et al., 2020). Spending money on others, volunteering, and performing acts of kindness can enhance subjective well-being (e.g., Aknin et al., 2013aAknin et al., , 2013bAknin et al., , 2013cDunn et al., 2008;Nelson et al., 2016;Pressman et al., 2015) and physical health (e.g., Nelson-Coffey et al., 2017;Raposa et al., 2016;Whillans et al., 2016). Although fewer studies have examined the relationship between prosocial behavior and givers' social lives, some promising initial findings exist. ...
Article
Full-text available
There is an urgent need for effective and easily accessible interventions targeting young adults’ social connection. This study tests whether engaging in prosocial behavior can mitigate social disconnection using an acts of kindness intervention that can be easily integrated into people’s daily routine. University students were randomly assigned to one of two kinds of 14-day kindness exercises (regular or anonymous) or an active control activity. 388 participants completed diary assessments of social contact and loneliness before and after the intervention. Results showed that the intervention promoting prosocial engagement increased social contact (especially with close others) and reduced daily loneliness for lonely participants. Anonymous kindness did not yield these outcomes, suggesting that direct contact with recipients may be an active ingredient driving such effects. This research provides a self-delivered and low-cost intervention that holds promise to reduce both objective social isolation and subjective feelings of loneliness among young adults.
... In the short-term, helping others tends to evoke positive emotions such as joy, contentment, and pride (Lyubomirsky et al., 2005). When enacted over time, prosocial behavior is also associated with a sense of meaning (Auhagen & Holub, 2006;Shek et al., 1994), life satisfaction (Caprara & Steca, 2005;Kahana, et al., 2013;Pashak & Laughter, 2012), and indices of physical health such as lower blood pressure (Whillans et al., 2016), lower levels of cortisol after encountering stress (Poulin & Holman, 2013), and greater longevity among older adults (Okun et al., 2013;see Hui et al., 2020 for a review of how prosocial behavior improves well-being). The many benefits of prosocial behavior could be maximized by encouraging people to perform them repeatedly -to make prosociality a habit. ...
Article
Depression is one of the characteristics of some mental disorders, including major depressive disorder; but it may be a natural reaction to life events, such as the death of a loved one, the effects of physical illnesses, or the side effects of certain medications. Today, in psychology, it has been proven that depression in different people may be associated with different symptoms. Various factors, including age and gender, can directly affect the symptoms of depression. Therefore, it is obvious that depression does not appear with the same symptoms in all people. However, a series of features are common symptoms of depression and include depressed mood, lack of interest even in activities that were enjoyable in the past, suicidal thoughts, sleep and appetite problems, feeling tired, lack of energy, pessimism and hopelessness about the future. In order to be diagnosed with one of the depression disorders,there must be several symptoms of depression in a certain period of time and also these symptoms lead to the destruction of the person’s performance in life. But some features of depression, such as apathy, may exist in a person without leading to the loss of a person’s function. Therefore, depression in these people is only considered a characteristic and not a disorder. In this chapter, we will examine the pathology of depressive disorders and then provide an overview of evidence-based psychotherapies for this common and debilitating disorder.
... Notably, increased FC between the PUT and the omPFC was found to predict a reduced susceptibility to time pressure during prosocial decision-making. This suggests that the emotional value and sense of morality associated with helping others (which can be considered as a reward) alleviate the effect of time pressure on prosocial decision-making (Lazar & Eisenberger, 2022;Whillans et al., 2016). Additionally, an increased FC between PUT and the MTG was associated with a lower susceptibility to time pressure during prosocial decision-making. ...
Article
Full-text available
The present study employed a novel paradigm and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to uncover the specific regulatory mechanism of time pressure and empathy trait in prosocial decision-making, compared to self-decision making. Participants were instructed to decide whether to spend their own monetary interest to alleviate themselves (or another person) from unpleasant noise threats under high and low time pressures. On the behavioral level, results showed that high time pressure had a significant effect on reducing participants' willingness to spend money on relieving themselves from the noise, while there is a similar but not significant trend in prosocial decision-making. On the neural level, for self-concerned decision-making, low time pressure activated the bilateral insula more strongly than high time pressure. For prosocial decision-making, high time pressure suppressed activations in multiple brain regions related to empathy (temporal pole, middle temporal gyrus, and inferior frontal gyrus), valuation (medial orbitofrontal cortex), and emotion (putamen). The functional connectivity strength among these regions, especially the connectivity between the medial orbitofrontal cortex and putamen, significantly predicted the effect of time pressure on prosocial decision-making at the behavioral level. Additionally , we discovered the activation of the medial orbitofrontal cortex partially mediated the effect of empathy trait scores on prosocial decision-making. These findings suggest that (1) there are different neural underpinnings for the modulation of time pressure for self and prosocial decision-making, and (2) the empathy trait plays a crucial role in the latter.
... At cardiovascular level and physiological stress responses, prosocial behavior has been linked to improved health (34). For example, prosocial activities are associated with lower levels of inflammation (proinflammatory cytokine activity) (35), which is a risk factor for heart disease and other chronic diseases; and to lower blood pressure (36), which is another important factor for cardiovascular health. The immune system can also be negatively impacted by lack of prosocial behavior (37). ...
Article
Full-text available
Prosocial values play a critical role in promoting care and concern for the well-being of others and prioritizing the common good of society. Evidence from population-based reports, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical studies suggests that these values depend on social cognition processes, such as empathy, deontological moral cognition, moral emotions, and social cooperation. Additionally, indirect evidence suggests that various forms of prosocial behaviors are associated with positive health outcomes at the behavioral, cardiovascular, immune, stress-related, and inflammatory pathways. However, it is unclear whether prosociality can positively influence brain health outcomes. In this perspective, we propose that prosocial values are not only influenced by brain conditions but could also potentially play a role in protecting brain health. We review studies from various fields that support this claim, including recent reports of prosociality-based interventions impacting brain health. We then explore potential multilevel mechanisms, based on the reduction of allostatic overload at behavioral, cardiovascular, immune, stress-related, and inflammatory levels. Finally, we propose potential prosociality-based interventions for improving brain health in at-risk populations, such as psychiatric and neurological patients, and individuals exposed to poverty or violence. Our perspective suggests that prosocial values may play a role in promoting and maintaining healthy brains.
... Many approaches suggest themselves. One can follow people around or video them, and count how many times they laugh and smile (e.g., Wojcik, Hovasapian, Graham, Motyl, & Ditto, 2015) or measure their levels of stress-related hormones or blood pressure (e.g., Whillans, Dunn, Sandstrom, Dickerson, & Madden, 2016). Advances in automated facial expression recognition and the increasingly widespread adoption of wearable health-monitoring technologies will lead to large and useful datasets in the future, as it becomes possible to link such datasets to individual-level economic variables. ...
Preprint
How is people’s happiness determined by economic factors such as their income? Big data are essential to answering this question, but there is disagreement about the amount of evidence for causal relationships that different types of analysis give. This chapter reviews different approaches to analysis. First, it is argued that most existing literature both underclaims regarding the evidence for causality given by some types of analysis of big data, such as correlational analyses, and overclaims for other types of analysis, such as those involving panel data. Thus, even correlational data can be informative to the extent that associations are generally rare and that theoretical targets and alternatives are fully specified and given prior probabilities. Second, a new methodological problem is identified for a specific model of the income-rank relationship. According to the income rank hypothesis, people’s well-being is determined not by their income but by the ranked position that their income within a social comparison group. It is shown by simulation that spurious rank effects can occur in regression analyses if there is noise in measured income, but that this problem can be reduced with the use of robust regression techniques. A new analysis of a large dataset, the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, is reported. The results show that income rank effects are not reduced by the use of robust regression techniques, suggesting that previous support for the income rank hypothesis is not due to a noise-related artefact.
... Prosocial motivations and behavior. A growing body of research has demonstrated how various forms of prosocial behavior predict well-being (reviewed in two recent metaanalyses: Curry et al., 2018;Hui et al., 2020) and even better health (e.g., Whillans et al., 2016). Helping others and contributing to society thus seem to be important forms of eudaimonic activities, given their beneficial effects on both individual (Aknin et al., 2013(Aknin et al., , 2020Dunn, Aknin, & Norton, 2008) and societal levels. ...
Chapter
Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is a broad theory of psychological growth and wellness that has revolutionized how we think about human motivation and the driving forces behind personality development. SDT focuses on people’s basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness and how social environments that support these needs foster more volition, vitality, and full functioning. SDT has supplied the basis for new and more effective practices in parenting, education, business, sport, healthcare, and other areas of life, fostering higher-quality motivation, engagement, and satisfaction. Drawing on over four decades of evidence-based research and application, The Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory delivers a truly integrative volume by the top researchers and experts within the field of SDT. Edited by SDT co-founder Richard M. Ryan, this Handbook not only provides the theory’s historical and scientific underpinnings but also draws together the latest research and insights, covering topics from the social and biological underpinnings of motivation and wellness to practical applications in all aspects of life. This volume will be an invaluable resource for both researchers and practitioners, as well as any student of human nature, with practical research and guidance.
Article
Objective: Prior studies suggest that prosocial behaviour can lead to better mental and physical health. Yet little is known about whether engaging in prosocial behaviour contributes to reducing physical pain. The objective of this study is to investigate longitudinal associations of two prosocial behaviours, donating money to charity and/or volunteering time to an organisation, with pain. Methods: Data are from the United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Survey (UKHLS, approximate N = 48,000 individuals). Both prosocial behaviours were assessed in 2011 and pain was assessed annually through 2020, according to the extent to which it interfered with respondents' ability to do work. Using a prospective longitudinal study design, linear mixed models examined associations of each prosocial behaviour separately and both combined on pain interference across 10 years of follow-up adjusting for a broad range of covariates including demographics, initial health status, and depression. Results: People who did versus did not donate or volunteer reported lower pain interference over 10 years of follow-up (donating b = -0.059, p < 0.001; volunteering b = -0.086, p < 0.001). Individuals who donated more versus less money reported lower pain interference although volunteering more hours was not associated with lower pain interference. Finally, findings suggested that engaging in both donating and volunteering versus neither was associated with lower pain interference over follow-up. Conclusion: There is a longitudinal association between donating money to charity and/or volunteering time to an organisation with pain interference with work. Understanding factors that help to reduce pain is relevant for the design of public health policies.
Article
Background: Support-giving has emerged as a health-relevant social behavior, such that giving more support is associated with better physical health. However, biological mechanisms by which support-giving and health are linked remain unclear. Whether support-giving uniquely relates to health relative to other psychosocial factors is also an open research question. Purpose: Two studies test the hypothesis that support-giving is uniquely (over-and-above other psychosocial factors) related to lower systemic inflammation, a biological correlate of health. Methods: Cross-sectional associations of support-giving with markers of systemic inflammation (i.e., interleukin-6 [IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP]) were examined in two independent samples of midlife adults (Study 1, n = 746; Study 2, n = 350). Results: Consistent with hypotheses, giving to more social targets (to family and friends, and also volunteering for various causes), but not receiving support from similar targets, was associated with lower IL-6. In conceptual replication and extension with a different measure of support-giving, higher frequency of support-giving behavior was associated with lower IL-6, even after adjusting for social network size and individual differences in social desirability. There were no associations between support-giving and CRP in either sample. Conclusions: Future research needs to establish causality and directly test mechanistic pathways, but together, findings reaffirm the health-relevance of support-giving behavior and shed light on a promising biological mechanism by which such effects may occur.
Article
Full-text available
"By now, it has become a bromide that the U.S. constitution and culture are built on the pursuit of happiness (Myers, 1992). According to this political philosophy, government should allow citizens to strive towards their own conception of happiness, and should assist them as much as possible to reach this goal. In return, citizens ought to make the most of the opportunity, ultimately contributing to the common good of all. The enduring appeal of this American ideal rests on the very plausible assumption that happiness is the fundamental objective of all human effort and activity, in all cultures, whether people are aware of it or not. By taking action, humans aim towards more positive conditions and feelings than they currently experience, or towards more positive future feelings than what they might otherwise experience if they failed to act (Carver & Scheier, 1998). Accordingly, becoming happier is not only a hugely popular topic on the self-help shelves, it is increasingly becoming a stated policy goal of world governments, with the gross national happiness of the country (rather than its gross domestic product) as the primary quantity to be maximized "
Article
Full-text available
The data includes measures collected for the two experiments reported in “False-Positive Psychology” [1] where listening to a randomly assigned song made people feel younger (Study 1) or actually be younger (Study 2). These data are useful because they illustrate inflations of false positive rates due to flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting of results. Data are useful for educational purposes.
Article
Full-text available
Altruism, although costly, may promote well-being for people who give. Costly giving by adults has received considerable attention, but less is known about the possible benefits, as well as biological and environmental correlates, of altruism in early childhood. In the current study, we present evidence that children who forgo self-gain to help other people show greater vagal flexibility and higher subsequent vagal tone than children who do not, and children from less wealthy families behave more altruistically than those from wealthier families. These results suggest that (a) altruism should be viewed through a biopsychosocial lens, (b) the influence of privileged contexts on children's willingness to make personal sacrifices for others emerges early, and (c) altruism and healthy vagal functioning may share reciprocal relations in childhood. When children help others at a cost to themselves, they could be playing an active role in promoting their own well-being as well as the well-being of others. © The Author(s) 2015.
Article
Full-text available
There is growing evidence that there are stable and meaningful individual differences in how much people vary in their experience of positive affect (PA), which in turn may have implications for health and well-being. Does such PA variability play a role in physiological processes potentially related to stress and health, such as daily cortisol profiles? We explored this question by examining whether PA variability across and within days in middle-aged adults (Study 1) and across weeks in older adults (Study 2) was associated with daily salivary cortisol profiles. In both studies, individuals who exhibited moderate PA variability demonstrated more favorable cortisol profiles, such as lower levels of cortisol and steeper slopes. Interestingly, for middle-aged adults (Study 1), high levels of within-day PA variability were associated with the least favorable cortisol profiles, whereas for older adults (Study 2), low levels of across-week PA variability were associated with the least favorable cortisol profiles. Collectively, these findings provide some of the first evidence that PA variability is related to daily cortisol profiles, suggesting that it may be better to experience a moderate degree of positive affect variability. Too much or too little variability, however, may be problematic, potentially carrying negative implications for stress-related physiological responding. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
When data analyses produce encouraging but nonsignificant results, researchers often respond by collecting more data. This may transform a disappointing dataset into a publishable study, but it does so at the cost of increasing the Type I error rate. How big of a problem is this, and what can we do about it? To answer the first question, we estimate the Type I error inflation based on the initial sample size, the number of participants used to augment the dataset, the critical value for determining significance (typically .05), and the maximum p value within the initial sample such that the dataset would be augmented. With one round of augmentation, Type I error inflation maximizes at .0975 with typical values from .0564 to .0883. To answer the second question, we review methods of adjusting the critical value to allow augmentation while maintaining p < .05, but we note that such methods must be applied a priori. For the common occurrence of post-hoc dataset augmentation, we develop a new statistic, paugmented , that represents the magnitude of the resulting Type I error inflation. We argue that the disclosure of post-hoc dataset augmentation via paugmented elevates such augmentation from a questionable research practice to an ethical research decision. © The Author(s) 2014.
Article
How do the trade-offs that we make about two of our most valuable resources—time and money—shape happiness? While past research has documented the immediate consequences of thinking about time and money, research has not yet examined whether people’s general orientations to prioritize time over money are associated with greater happiness. In the current research, we develop the Resource Orientation Measure (ROM) to assess people’s stable preferences to prioritize time over money. Next, using data from students, adults recruited from the community, and a representative sample of employed Americans, we show that the ROM is associated with greater well-being. These findings could not be explained by materialism, material striving, current feelings of time or material affluence, or demographic characteristics such as income or marital status. Across six studies (N=4,690), we provide the first empirical evidence that prioritizing time over money is a stable preference related to greater subjective well-being.