A simulation study of the BERL Combustor 1, 2, using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), is presented. This work is part of John Zink Company’s effort to validate the CFD models most frequently used by the Simulation Technology. Solutions group to provide modelling services for its customers and to support internal R&D. The CFD results are carefully compared with the experimental data from the
... [Show full abstract] BERL project. The current study focused mainly on combustion models and turbulence models. To simulate combustion processes, the selection of an applicable combustion model is a key decision a CFD engineer has to make. The PDF model, multiple flamelets model, eddy dissipation model, and finite-rate/eddy-dissipation model with two different global rates were tested. Simulation results show that the finite-rate/eddy-dissipation model provided the closest agreement with the BERL data. The standard k-ε, realizable k-ε, RNG k-ε, and Reynolds Stress turbulence models were evaluated as the closures. The simulation study indicates that all the turbulence models yielded good agreement with measurements in the highly reacting zone. However, the accuracy of these models varied in areas away from the reacting zone. In some cases, the discrepancy between the predictions and measurements was as high as 20% at certain locations. Finally, discussions and future work are provided.