Content uploaded by Jaume Mora
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jaume Mora on Dec 15, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT
Use of 3D Prototypes for Complex Surgical Oncologic Cases
Lucas Krauel
1
•Felip Fenollosa
2
•Lucı
´a Riaza
3
•Martı
´nPe
´rez
2
•Xavier Tarrado
1
•
Andre
´s Morales
4
•Joan Goma
`
2
•Jaume Mora
4
ÓSocie
´te
´Internationale de Chirurgie 2015
Abstract
Introduction Physical 3D models known by the industry as rapid prototyping involve the creation of a physical
model from a 3D computer version. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of reports on the use of 3D
models in medicine. Printing such 3D models with different materials integrating the many components of human
anatomy is technically challenging. In this article, we report our technological developments along with our clinical
implementation experience using high-fidelity 3D prototypes of tumors encasing major vessels in anatomically
sensitive areas.
Methods Three patients with tumors encasing major vessels that implied complex surgery were selected for surgical
planning using 3D prototypes. 3D virtual models were obtained from routine CT and MRI images. The models, with
all their anatomical relations, were created by an expert pediatric radiologist and a surgeon, image by image, along
with a computerized-aided design engineer.
Results Surgeons had the opportunity to practice on the model before the surgery. This allowed questions regarding
surgical approach; feasibility and potential complications to be raised in advance of the actual procedure. All patients
then successfully underwent surgery as planned.
Conclusion Having a tumor physically printed in its different main component parts with its anatomical rela-
tionships is technically feasible. Since a gross total resection is prognostic in a significant percentage of tumor types,
refinements in planning may help achieve greater and safer resections therefore contributing to improve surgical
management of complex tumors. In this early experience, 3D prototyping helped significantly in the many aspects of
surgical oncology planning.
&Lucas Krauel
lkrauel@hsjdbcn.org
Felip Fenollosa
ffenollosa@fundaciocim.org
Lucı
´a Riaza
lriaza@hsjdbcn.org
Martı
´nPe
´rez
martinpereztorrents@gmail.com
Xavier Tarrado
xtarrado@hsjdbcn.org
Andre
´s Morales
amorales@hsjdbcn.org
Joan Goma
`
jgoma@fundaciocim.org
Jaume Mora
jmora@hsjdbcn.org
1
Pediatric Surgery Department, Hospital Sant Joan de De
´u,
Universitat de Barcelona, Passeig de Sant Joan de De
´u, 2,
08950 Barcelona, Spain
2
Fundacio
´CIM, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
ETSEIB, Universitat Polite
`cnica de Catalunya, Diagonal 647,
08028 Barcelona, Spain
123
World J Surg
DOI 10.1007/s00268-015-3295-y
Introduction
Physical 3D models known by the industry as rapid pro-
totyping involve the creation of a physical model from a
3D computer version. This technology started in 1987
when the first stereolithography machine was commer-
cialized. In recent years, there has been an increasing
number of reports on the use of 3D models in medicine for
teaching, diagnosis, surgical planning, and bone recon-
structions [1–5]. Using 3D printing for boney structures is
very straightforward. Therefore most of the published lit-
erature in medicine is based on maxillofacial and ortho-
pedic cases. However, fewer experiences are being
described about soft tissue surgical planning 3D printing
[6–9]. Printing 3D models with different materials inte-
grating the many components of the anatomy is technically
more challenging. Surgical oncology dealing with tumors
encasing major vessels can be difficult to perform and
careful planning is mandatory.
In this article, we report our technological developments
and clinical implementation experience gained from high-
fidelity 3D prototypes of tumors encasing major vessels in
anatomically sensitive areas. The models were designed
from patients’ routine computed tomography (CT) and
magnetic resonance image (MRI) imaging studies.
Methods
Patients and tumors
Three patients with tumors encasing major vessels that
implied complex surgery were selected for surgical plan-
ning using 3D prototypes before the operation. A summary
of the patients and tumor characteristics are shown in
Table 1.
Case #1 is a 3-year-old male with stage 4 MYCN
amplified, high-risk, neuroblastoma (NB). After mN7
induction chemotherapy, the metastatic disease presented a
complete response. Imaging studies showed a suprarenal
tumor extending to the midline, encasing the right renal
artery, the right renal vein, the inferior vena cava (IVC),
and the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Local control
with surgery was indicated.
Case #2 is a 5-year-old male with a stage 4 MYCN
amplified, high-risk, NB. After mN7 induction
3
Pediatric Radiology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de De
´u,
Universitat de Barcelona, Passeig de Sant Joan de De
´u, 2,
08950 Barcelona, Spain
4
Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Department, Hospital
Sant Joan de De
´u, Universitat de Barcelona, Passeig de Sant
Joan de De
´u, 2, 08950 Barcelona, Spain
Table 1 Patients Characteristics and 3D printing technology used
Age
(years)
Sex Diagnosis Imaging 3D prototype technology Surgical approach Tumor volume
removed correlated
with prototype tumor
volume
Clavien–Dindo
complications
Case 1 3 M High-risk stage 4
neuroblastoma
Right Suprarenal mass with
encasement of right renal artery,
right renal vein, IVC, and SMA
Polyjet 3D printing using a Connex 500
machine by Stratasys
Thoracoabdominal Yes None
Case 2 5 M High-risk stage 4
neuroblastoma
Right mass crossing the midline with
encasement of celiac trunk, SMA,
IMA, renal arteries, renal veins,
IVC, portal vein, and hepatic duct
Polyjet 3D printing using a Connex 500
machine by Stratasys
SLS 3D model made in a Vanguard
machine by 3D Systems
Surgical support on FFF open-source
technology
Thoracoabdominal Yes II (transfusion)
Case 3 11 M Mediastinal sinovial
sarcoma
Right mediastinal mass with invasion
of SVC and with no plane of
separation with trachea, main right
bronchus, right pulmonary vein,
and superior right lobule artery
Polyjet 3D printing using a Connex 500
machine by Stratasys
SLS 3D model made in a Vanguard
machine by 3D systems
Medium
sternotomy
yes I (collection)
II (transfusion)
World J Surg
123
chemotherapy, the metastatic disease was in complete
remission. A midline-centered mass remained encasing the
celiac trunk, SMA, inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), both
renal arteries, the renal veins, IVC, portal vein, the right
hepatic artery, and the hepatic duct. Local control was
advised with surgery.
Case #3 is an 11-year-old male with a primary medi-
astinal synovial sarcoma (SS) with part of the tumor mass
infiltrating the superior vena cava and the upper part of the
right atrium. The right pulmonary artery was also involved
as well as the right main bronchi with no separation plane
from the tumor.
The 3D models
To create the 3D models, a computerized-aided design
(CAD) engineer, along with an expert pediatric radiologist
and the leading surgeon, used CT images to delineate the
tumor, the anatomical relations and the major vessels
encased, working with tools that use color ranges (con-
trasting the vessels and bone mass) and manually (with the
soft tissues) selecting image by image the differentiated
parts. The software used for that purpose was VRMed
DICOM Platform [10], developed in the ViRVIG research
group (UPC University), and the resolution of the medical
images was 1.5 mm of layer thickness in Case #1 and Case
#2 and 0.3 mm in Case #3.
To ensure the right reproduction of the real anatomy, the
pediatric radiologist and the surgeon monitored all the
work with review meetings, and the team used MRI images
to compare and confirm results.
The time spent on the 3D model generation was around
10 h per case.
In each case, specific measures were taken in response
to the acquired experience and the specific needs.
Case #1: a 3D virtual model was obtained from routine
abdomen CT and MRI images. When the virtual model was
created (Fig. 1a), it was again reviewed by the same radi-
ologist and the oncologic surgeon prior to 3D printing. The
objective was to create a model where the part representing
the tumor had an ‘‘operable’’ translucent and soft texture
that allowed visualization of the encased vessels and sur-
rounding anatomical structures so that the surgical team
could ‘‘operate’’ and ‘‘play’’ with it prior to the day of the
actual surgery. The technology applied was Polyjet 3D
Printing using a Connex 500 machine by Stratasys. Two
different 3D files were created. One including bones, ves-
sels and other parts was built using a white rigid opaque
epoxy photopolymer. A different material was used to print
the other file which reproduced the tumor that was soft and
translucent (Fig. 1b). Manufacturing a Polyjet 3D model
can take around 24 h.
Case #2: the DICOM images already anticipated that
the 3D-printed tumor would not be able to show the most
of the encased vessels. The anatomical positioning of the
vessels inside the tumor mass made it difficult to
accomplish the main goal of the surgical planning using
this technology, which was to visualize before the real
surgery the vessels potentially in danger from the tumor
resection. Therefore, it was decided to complement the
Polyjet 3D model with a second model made by SLS in a
Vanguard machine by 3D Systems. It consisted of two
parts, the first including the encased vessels with its
anatomical relations; and the second including the tumor
which could be removed so one could actually see the
vessels and the rest of the anatomy without the tumor
(Fig. 2).
Case #3: three prototypes were printed including the
same two as in Case #2 and a third one which represented
the tumor alone in order for the surgical team to have the
Fig. 1 a 3D virtual reconstruction of case 1 tumor encasing major vessels from CT and MRI fusion images. b3D-printed prototype of case 1.
Tumor is represented in a semitransparent, ‘‘operable’’ consistency
World J Surg
123
tumor volume ‘‘in hands’’ before the surgery (Fig. 3). The
third model was also made using SLS technology.
For Case #2, a 3D-customized support system was built
so the model was placed in the same position as the one
intended for the surgery (lateral decubitus). This
improvement was printed with FFF open-source technol-
ogy [11].
The models could be sterilized with Steam Formalde-
hyde at 60–80 °C, thus allowing the models to be ready
available for checking at any time during the surgical
procedure.
Results
The models were completed 1 week before the planned
surgery, so the surgical team was able to study the case and
operate on them well enough in advance. The prototypes
were to real scale of the patient’s organs thus giving an
impression of what to expect during surgery. Their soft
consistency allowed the use of the different surgical
instruments that would be used in the real surgery. The
models gave surgeons a new tool for the surgical planning.
This was especially of good use to residents, fellows, and
Fig. 2 a 3D-printed prototype of case 2. Right mass crossing the
midline with encasement of celiac trunk, SMA, IMA, renal arteries,
renal veins, IVC, portal vein, and hepatic duct. Tumor is also
represented in a semitransparent, ‘‘operable’’ consistency. bPrinted
prototype of the same case with the tumor removed allowing the view
of encased vessels
Fig. 3 a 3D-printed prototype of mediastinal tumor with invasion of
SVC and with no plane of separation with trachea, main right
bronchus, right pulmonary vein, and superior right lobule artery.
b3D-printed prototype of tumor volume. c3D-printed prototype of
the same case, tumor free
World J Surg
123
young surgeons. The fact that the selected tumors were
complicated and not very common, also gave the leading
surgeon more confidence for the surgery. All patients
underwent surgery as planned successfully. A right thora-
coabdominal (TA) incision was used in Case #1. Gross
total resection (GTR) of the tumor encasing major vessels
was achieved with no complications. The volume of the
tumor correlated with the prototype (Fig. 4). A TA incision
was also used in Case #2. GTR was performed without
complications. For Case #3, a medium sternotomy was
performed. Cannulation of the heart and extracorporeal
circulation was performed as planned. The tumor was
totally removed along with a portion of the right atrium
(RA) and superior vena cava (SVC), both invaded by the
tumor. A tubularized dacron prosthesis was used to
reconstruct the defect in the RA and SVC. The 3D models
were used in real time during the surgeries to reassess the
steps to be taken in order to remove the tumor mass
preserving the encased vessels. All models predicted pre-
cisely the surgical findings in terms of tumor volume as
well as vascular relationships.
Discussion
Rapid prototyping is the creation of a physical 3D model
from computer design. The 3D printer uses the information
of a virtual 3D model (obtained from a scanner or a 3D
drawing) to print the final structure [12,13]. Most of the
reported clinical applications are in maxillofacial surgery,
medical education, training, research, and lately, implant
and tissue designing [3,14]. Several studies have demon-
strated the efficacy of 3D models for the planning of
maxillofacial surgeries [15–17]. A more accurate diagnosis
and better understanding of complex anatomy as well as
the possibility of preplanning are keys in the implementa-
tion of these technologies with better results [18]. Rapid
prototyping also enhances quick learning and the possi-
bility of case simulations [19–21] highlighting important
aspects in reducing risks during surgery and patient post-
operative complications [9].
In this study, we have explored new developments in
technology and clinical feasibility of newly designed 3D-
printed models of complex soft tissue tumors with their
anatomical relationships. By printing three different mod-
els of each tumor, the tumor and its relationships, the
anatomy without the tumor and the tumor volume, we were
able to explore different aspects required for detailed sur-
gical planning. The integrated model allowed us to practice
on the prototype and simulate the surgery before the
operation. The consistency of the tumor material allowed
us to dissect it with regular surgical instruments, cut it, and
peel it away from organs and vessels. We also could
practice different surgical approaches and weigh up the
risks and benefits of each option in advance.
The printing of the tumor volume alone was also very
useful. Some tumors are capsulated and well defined, but
with others, such as the majority of high-risk neuroblas-
tomas and sarcomas, tumor limits might be difficult to
assess. So much so, that sometimes the removal of the
tumor has to be done piecemeal. In those cases, having the
tumor volume printed, definitely helps the surgeon to
evaluate the grade of resection and objectively quantify a
GTR.
The major technical drawback of the current models is
that the vessels and organs have a rigid consistency.
Despite the fact that their anatomical relations with the
tumor are very accurate, at the time of surgical dissection,
they did not behave in the same elastic way as in the real
anatomy. This is why having a prototype without the tumor
Fig. 4 Case 1 removed tumor and prototype. Main tumor volume is
the same as the 3D printed. Remaining tumor encasing major vessels
was removed piecemeal
World J Surg
123
was very useful so we could actually foresee the anatomy
of the blood vessels embedded within the tumor.
This is a new technological development in an early
stage with little data. Research is ongoing in our labora-
tories to improve the elasticity of the different densities of
soft tissues. Furthermore, since the cost of the models is a
determinant factor in making surgical planning with 3D-
printed prototypes a standard for challenging surgical
cases, further improvements in technology need to be
developed. We are using open-source based technology
and it is our belief that only open 3D printing can face this
challenge in the future. We welcome the surgical com-
munity to share its developments in order to improve to a
more realistic model.
Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Margarita
Vancells MD, JM Caffarena MD, and Rosalia Carrasco MD PhD for
their technical expertise.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest None.
References
1. Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current
and projected uses. Pharm Ther 39:704
2. Webb PA (2000) A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques
in the medical and biomedical sector. J Med Eng Technol
24:149–153
3. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM,
Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor HU et al (2010) 3D printing based
on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput
Assist Radiol Surg 5:335–341
4. Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B, Kamaci S, Koca-
dereli I (2007) Use of three-dimensional medical modeling
methods for precise planning of orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac
Surg 18:740–747
5. Mankovich NJ, Cheeseman AM, Stoker NG (1990) The display
of three-dimensional anatomy with stereolithographic models.
J Digit Imaging 3:200–203
6. Ikegami T, Maehara Y (2013) Transplantation: 3D printing of the
liver in living donor liver transplantation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol
Hepatol 10:697–698
7. Jacobs S, Grunert R, Mohr FW, Falk V (2008) 3D-Imaging of
cardiac structures using 3D heart models for planning in heart
surgery: a preliminary study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
7:6–9
8. Costello JP, Olivieri LJ, Krieger A, Thabit O, Marshall MB, Yoo
SJ, Kim PC, Jonas RA, Nath DS (2014) Utilizing three-dimen-
sional printing technology to assess the feasibility of high-fidelity
synthetic ventricular septal defect models for simulation in
medical education. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg
5:421–426
9. Silberstein JL, Maddox MM, Dorsey P, Feibus A, Thomas R, Lee
BR (2014) Physical models of renal malignancies using standard
cross-sectional imaging and 3-dimensional printers: a pilot study.
Urology 84:268–272
10. Monclu
´s E, Mun
˜oz-Pandiella I, Brunet P, Conesa G (2012)
Ventricular puncture trainer. In: CEIG 2012: XXII Spanish
conference of computer graphics, pp 45–48
11. Horne R (2015) From reprap students to masters of 3d printing—
a Spanish success story. Disruptive Magazine. http://dis
ruptivemagazine.com/blog/from-reprap-students-to-masters-of-
3d-printing-a-spanish-success-story-part-1/.Accessed21May
2015.
12. Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS (2010) Rapid prototyping princi-
ples and applications, 3rd edn. World Scientific, Singapore
13. Griffith ML, Harwell LD, Romero JT, Schlienger E, Atwood CL,
Smugeresky JE (1997) Multi-material processing by LENS. In:
Proceedings of the 1997 solid freeform fabrication symposium,
vol 8, pp 387–393
14. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.
Nat Biotechnol 32:773–785
15. Mu
¨ller A, Krishnan KG, Uhl E, Mast G (2003) The application of
rapid prototyping techniques in cranial reconstruction and pre-
operative planning in neurosurgery. J Craniofac Surg 14:899–914
16. D’Urso PS, Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, Bruce LJ, Atkinson RL,
Lanigan MW et al (1999) Stereolithographic biomodelling in
cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. J Craniomax-
illofac Surg 27:30–37
17. Esses SJ, Berman P, Bloom AI, Sosna J (2011) Clinical appli-
cations of physical 3D models derived from MDCT data and
created by rapid prototyping. Am J Roentgenol 196:W683–W688
18. Mao K, Wang Y, Xiao S, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang X et al (2010)
Clinical application of computer-designed polystyrene models in
complex severe spinal deformities: a pilot study. Eur Spine J
19:797–802
19. Schievano S, Migliavacca F, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Carmi-
nati M, Wilson N et al (2007) Percutaneous pulmonary valve
implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular
outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data. Radiology
242:490–497
20. Nakada T, Akiba T, Inagaki T, Morikawa T (2014) Thoraco-
scopic anatomical subsegmentectomy of the right S2b ?S3
using a 3D printing model with rapid prototyping. Interact Car-
diovasc Thorac Surg 19:696–698
21. Sulaiman A, Boussel L, Taconnet F, Serfaty JM, Alsaid H, Attia
C, Huet L, Douek P (2008) In vitro non-rigid life-size model of
aortic arch aneurysm for endovascular prosthesis assessment. Eur
J Cardiothorac Surg 33:53–57
World J Surg
123