Content uploaded by Stan Starygin
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Stan Starygin on Nov 02, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
April 2013
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville:
Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
By Stan Starygin*
Abstract
The Bougainville Peace Agreement did not bring the peace to Bougainville many had
hoped for. It brought a stalemate of lawlessness presided over by a weak unarmed
autonomous government that tries to navigate its way around the armed gangs
formed from the residue of the civil war. The gangs control the half of the island
which houses one of the world’s largest deposits of copper and gold, the Panguna
mine. This paper oers a close look at these gangs and seeks to answer the quesons
of (1) how each gang relates to the mine through the tradional rules of land tenure;
(2) how much control each gangs exercises over the mine and (3) what each gang’s
views on reopening of the mine are.
Keywords: Bougainville, Crisis, civil war, Combatant, Reconciliaon, Gang, Panguna
mine
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
Vol. 3| No. 1
April 2013
www.cesran.org
Stan Starygin has been involved with legal and judicial reform projects in early recovery and post-
conict countries across Africa and the South Pacic. He rst arrived in Papua New Guinea in
2009, eight years aer the Bougainville Peace Agreement, originally serving for one year and then
returning in 2010 and remaining throughout the period of wring of this paper. The paper was
almost enrely researched and wrien in Papua New Guinea, with intermient crical input into
the developing dra from Bougainvilleans and those others familiar with the Bougainville Crisis
and its present state.
Email: stan.starygin@gmail.com
Introducon1
It will be dicult to dispute that the internaonal media determines which conicts the world
follows. Certain armed conicts (mainly those which involve US or European interests), in the
opinion of the internaonal media, merit sustained aenon throughout their duraon while
others barely merit a menon. The Bougainville conict (oen known as ‘the Bougainville
Crisis’) belongs in the laer category. While having received reasonably signicant coverage
from the Australian and New Zealand news media, it developed, reached its peak and
transformed unnoced by the rest of the world.
The Bougainville Crisis started out as a series of terrorist acts2 staged by a certain segment of
the tradional owners of the land which housed one of the world’s largest copper and gold
mines, the Panguna mine. The terrorism was aimed at rst at the property of Bougainville
Copper Limited (BCL), - the Brish company Rio Tinto’s Australian subsidiary - which operated
the mine, and then secondly at the Papua New Guinea Defense Force (‘PNGDF’) that was
deployed to quell the unrest. These terrorist acts had the eect of shung down the mine.
The ght against the Papua New Guinea Defense Force quickly escalated to the reigning of
Bougainville’s struggle for independence from PNG3 based upon a well-entrenched belief that
“Bougainville would be beer o being independent”4 and to “broaden the support base” for
the escalang ght.5
While theories on the causes of the Bougainville Crisis abound,6 there is no credible way of
believing that a conict of that scale and intensity would have happened without the
Panguna mine.7 There is equally no plausible argument to be made that a claim of monetary
compensaon of 10 billion kinas (“at the me approximately $US 10 billion”)8 and its
rejecon by the BCL formed at least the inial grievance the sasfacon of which the
56
Journal
of Conict
Transformation
& Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
1. My hearelt gratude goes out to those on Bougainville who helped me research this paper. These
individuals are referenced in this paper under codenames as retaliaon for many of them is not a
mere word they read in literature but that which aects every bre of their lives. I would also like to
thank my partner Krisna and my son Nathan for being my anchor throughout this process.
2. Filer, ‘The Bougainville Rebellion’, 1
3. Connell, ‘The Future of an Island Microstate’, 193
4. Regan, ‘Current Development in the Pacic, 273
5. Banks, ‘Understanding ‘Resource’ Conicts,’ 27
6. Regan, ‘Current Development in the Pacic,’ 269-270, Hilson, ‘Mining and Civil Conict,’ 27. Hawsley,
‘Papua New Guinea at Thirty,’ 168. 3
7. Banks, ‘Understanding ‘Resource’ Conicts,’ 27. Filer, ‘The Bougainville Rebellion’, 6. Boege,
‘Peacebuilding and State Formaon,’ 29 Braithwaite and Nickson, ‘Timing Truth, Reconciliaon, and
Jusce,’ 452. Newell and Sheehy, ‘Corporate Militaries and States’.
8. Regan, ‘Current Development in the Pacic,’ 277.
landowners sought through the violence.9 The man who led the group that claimed this
compensaon, Francis Ona, stood to personally benet from the sasfacon of the claim
through which he sought to compensate himself and his family for otherwise “lile
entlement to [mining lease] land […] and […] scant rent and compensaon”10 they
received.11
The rst acts of terrorism led to the establishment of a small terror group which called itself
the Bougainville Revoluonary Army (‘BRA’). The use of the name was quickly expanded to
become a rallying call to which “[t]he strongest support came from frustrated young men
with few economic opportunies for whom membership of the BRA gave power and status”12
and who were not “direct beneciaries of the mine”;13 a number of these men were engaged
in criminal acvity prior to the beginning of the Crisis and the incepon of the BRA. Despite
the ring of its name the BRA was never a cohesive force, with the central command oen
having trouble imposing its will on the smaller local groups that comprised the BRA.14 The
constuent groups were of great diversity and ranged from “disciplined and highly
movated” to those that were “lile more than criminal gangs”.15
Disagreements on how to proceed within the central command of the BRA eventually led to a
schism, which divided those who went on to join the peace process (led by Ishmael Toroama)
which culminated in a peace agreement (Bougainville Peace Agreement) in 2001, from those
who categorically refused any involvement in the peace agreement (led by Ona).16 Following
the signing of the BPA, Bougainville’s autonomy within the Papua New Guinean state it
established gave rise to the creaon of the Autonomous Bougainville Government (‘ABG’).
Many of those who joined the peace process ended up in the ABG reaping the nancial
benets of PNG and internaonal donor funding;17 those who did not connued on with what
one observer aptly called “Rambo-style leadership”18 bringing the conict down to the level
of jockeying for posion of control over strategic locales. Observers of the peace process
ancipated a threat to the peace contained in the laer, more specically in Ona and his
followers,19 and so it has come to pass with the “Rambos” connuing to engage in armed
violence and connuing to control access to the Panguna mine20 and other resource sites. The
United Naons and Pacic countries-sponsored eort at disarming these individuals
experienced an eventual failure, aer inial success,21 with scores of contained weapons
having made their way back to the gangs by 2006 and remain in their possession today.
57
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
9. Filer, ‘The Bougainville Rebellion,’ 1.Islam, ‘Secession Crisis in Papua New Guinea,’ 453 .White,
‘Including Local Communie,’ 332 .
10. Regan, ‘Current Development in the Pacic,’ 277. Strathern and Stewart, ‘The Problems of Peace-
Makers,’ 689.
11. Kopel, et al, ‘Firearms Possession,’ 397.
12. Regan, ‘Current Development in the Pacic,’ 277.
13. Islam, ‘Secession Crisis in Papua New Guinea,’ 453-454.
14. Sam Kauona, Palmerston, New Zealand, 16 June 2000, interview with NZine Regan, ‘Current Develop-
ment in the Pacic,’ 278. Boege, ‘Peacebuilding and State Formaon,’ 29, 31. Oswald Iten, ‘Peace Trea-
ty for Bougainville’.
15. Regan, ‘Current Development in the Pacic,’ 278.
16. Regan, ‘The Bougainville Polical Selement,’ 115-116.
17. Kent and Barne, ‘The Bougainville Polical Selement,’ 34, 38.
18. Filer, ‘The Bougainville Rebellion,’ 11.
19. . Regan, ‘The Bougainville Polical Selement,’ 124.
20. Boege, ‘How to Maintain Peace,’ 355.
21. Spark and Bailey, ‘Disarmament in Bougainville,’ 606.
This paper examines the personas of the main protagonists of this “Rambo-style leadership”,
their relaon to the Panguna mine, to one another, to the ABG, the level of control they
exercise over the Panguna mine, and their views on reopening of the mine.
Ishmael Toroama
One of these “Rambos” is a Central Bougainville nave Ishmael Toroama. Western audiences
rst met Toroama in a documentary entled The Coconut Revoluon which sought to portray
the BRA as a gang of convivial guerrillas in pursuit of self-reliance and return to their
tradional lifestyle.
The less cartoonish Toroama is the man who signed the Bougainville Peace Agreement
(‘BPA’) as “Chief of Defense, Bougainville Revoluonary Army”. Toroama joined the BRA in
the early days of the movement and according to some contested accounts was the rst BRA
guerrilla to obtain an automac weapon from the enemy, the Papua New Guinea Defense
Force (‘PNGDF’).22 Having gained a posion of respect early in the conict, Toroama quickly
became a prominent ‘eld commander’. He became a natural choice for successor in the
opinion of the BRA’s original chief of defense Sam Kauona when Kauona decided to leave the
BRA in 1999 to “study in New Zealand”.23
With the BRA never having been a cohesive military force, cohesion was not forged under
Toroama’s command. In fact, further fracturing and inadvertent devolvement of command
power connued.24 Therefore the queson remains as to what extent of command power
Toroama represented when he signed o on the BPA as “Chief of Defense, Bougainville
Revoluonary Army”. While the extent of Toroama’s command power over the BRA at the
me of signing of the BPA is a topic for another study, it can be said with certainty here that
wherever that power was held it was not held by the BRA facon loyal to Ona, evidenced by
Toroama giving Ona an ulmatum to disarm in 2003.25 During the outset of the BPA-
prescribed disarmament process, as disnct from other aempted disarmament processes,
Toroama presented himself as ‘an agent of peace’ and placed all the blame for disrupons in
the process on the Ona facon of the BRA, now known as ‘the Me’ekamui Defense Force’.26
Toroama’s desire to be seen as part of the soluon during this period is beyond doubt. His
acons and those of “his men” tell a more conicted tale.27 It is evident that Toroama’s
version of the story was accepted by the internaonal community who connued working on
disarmament with and through him. The internaonal community’s honeymoon with
Toroama connued despite “his men” re-opening the weapons containers and rearming
themselves. Historical studies will show whether Toroama’s argument for rearmament can be
substanated by security concerns, however, this paper will limit itself to acknowledging the
fact that such rearmament did take place. Starng from that point and given that the
acronym ‘BRA’ was relegated to history Toroama began to preside over what can be best
58
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
22. Braithwaite et al., ‘Peacebuilding Compared Working Paper 6: Bougainville (2009).Informant C2, Port
Moresby, February, 2012, Personal Interview.
23. Sam Kauona, Kieta, Arawa, Bougainville, April, 2009, Personal Interview
24. Informants C3 and S1, Arawa, Bougainville, October 2009, personal Interview.
25. Toroama’s Leer to Ona (March 11, 2003).
26. Toroama’s Leer to Ona (March 11, 2003)
27. Spark & Bailey, ‘Disarmament in Bougainville,’ 605. Toroama’s Leer to Ona, 11 March 2003.
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
described as a street gang composed of ex-combatants and the new crop of ‘wannabe’
combatants who were too young to ght in the Crisis.28
Stories of old glory helped Toroama maintain some of his Crisis-period support base and
aract new recruits but more tangible things were needed to elicit longer-term loyalty. From
fairly early days of Australian administraon in Papua New Guinea the governing authority
noted that much of Papua New Guinean wealth was channeled into “the ownership of pigs
and staging of feasts”.29 These were the main manifestaons of status and those who sought
status sought to devise ways of accumulang pigs and using them to stage feasts. Toroama
saw a shortcut to acquiring status through tradional means by tapping the largesse brought
to Bougainville by Australian Agency for Internaonal Development (‘AusAID’) and the United
Naons Development Program (‘UNDP’), a bulk of whose eorts were geared towards post-
conict reconciliaon through tradional means.
Tradional reconciliaons in Bougainville are complex processes that, at a minimum, include:
(1) rst approach and “cooling-down payment” (somemes known as ‘payment to stay the
anger’); (2) payment of the compensaon; (3) acceptance of compensaon and forgiveness;
(4) a ritual feast and (5) a vow of non-connuaon of the conict.30 Besides being lengthy,
these processes are also very expensive. Toroama fashioned himself into a true master of
ceremonies for these events. This role went beyond the use of his celebrity to bring
disputants together and grew to include event management by Toroama’s gang and those
businesses in which Toroama had ‘an interest’ which, in turn, became the main conduits for
AusAid and UNDP’s reconciliaon dollars.31 There is no reason to believe that either AusAid or
UNDP (at least at the management level) intended to create an environment for enriching
Toroama and his gang;32 the enrichment that did occur took place due to these agencies’ lack
of understanding of the context of the residual Bougainville conict, local power dynamics,33
absence of long-term vision or strategy,34 methods of or eorts to evaluate aid
eecveness,35 and these agencies’ equaon of the amounts disbursed for reconciliaon
ceremonies with these agencies’ eecveness as partners in the peace process.
As the volume of reconciliaon largesse was reduced towards the end of 2009,36 Toroama
began turning to other sources of income for himself and his gang. The rusng Panguna mine
equipment was his natural next target. The owner of this equipment, Bougainville Copper
Limited, which connues to operate in Papua New Guinea, approached the ABG in the wake
of illegal dismantling of the equipment, with a request to regulate the ongoing dismantling
and sale of the Panguna mine equipment in a manner that would ensure that “some benet
59
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
28. Kent and Barne, ‘The Bougainville Polical Selement,’ 38.
29. Gewertz and Errington, ‘Emerging Class in Papua New Guinea,’ 13-14.
30. Tanis, ‘Reconciliaon: My Side of the Island’.
31. Informants C1, Arawa, Bougainville. October 2009 and C2, Port Moresby, January, 2012, personal in-
terview
32. Program Specialist for Prevenon and Recovery of the UNDP PNG Country Oce Jörg Schimmel, Port
Moresby, February 2012, Personal Interview
33. Program Specialist for Prevenon and Recovery of the UNDP PNG Country Oce Jörg Schimmel, Port
Moresby, February 2012, Personal Interview
34. Jorg Schimmel, Port Moresby, February 2012, Personal Interview
35. Jorg Schimmel, Port Moresby, Feburary 2012, Personal Interview. Personal Discussion with Bougain-
ville AusAid Representave Edwina Bes, Buka, Bougainville, January 2010.
36. Jörg Schimmel, Port Moresby, February 2012, Personal Interview.
[s] [were] passed back to the landowners and to Bougainvilleans in general, and that [the
export of scrap metal be] done with [ABG] knowledge and approval and [that it] compli[ed]
with the laws of Bougainville and Papua New Guinea”.37 The Komeri Holdings Limited was
incorporated as a result of this request and as a mine-lease area landowners company.38 The
landowners did secure the controlling interest in the company but the armed men of the area
did not miss a chance to aach themselves onto this acon. Toroama’s gang was no
excepon to that; in fact it secured the largest interest (20%) in the company among the
armed gangs. The volality of this uneasy alliance with other gangs was evident from the
outset of the project and it has come to a head on a number of occasions on which
Toroama’s gang clashed with that of Chris Uma in armed confrontaon. The two’s current
parcipaon in the stripping of the Panguna mine equipment keeps the situaon around the
township of Arawa -the town built by BCL to house the Panguna mine personnel- tense and
unpredictable with Arawa’s denizens being aware that both gangs have weapons and are
ready to use them at the slightest of provocaon.
In addion to the scrap metal project Toroama’s gang oers ‘protecon service’ to local
businesses and helps them ‘ward o’ compeon.39 This maa-like authority of Toroama’s
gang is manifest in denizens turning to Toroama for issues of law and order more readily than
they do to the unarmed and oen powerless ABG police, a police force that is unarmed as a
result of arrangements agreed to during the peace process.
Toroama’s BRA-days notoriety, his role in the peace process, the magnitude of his post-Crisis
‘economic acvity’ and the possession of weapons and loyalty of the men who carry them
have made Toroama a viable polical force in Central Bougainville. Toroama has not won an
elecon yet but it is not for want of trying. He is no underdog and has come a solid second in
the last two elecons, although the voters each me preferred a civil servant with a record of
service to Toroama.40 Encouraged by his numbers and undeterred by defeat Toroama has
announced his candidacy for President of Bougainville for the 2015 elecon.
Toroama’s relaonship to the Panguna mine through the rules of tradional landownership is
very simple: he has none; he is from the Kongara Mountains that lie miles away from the
Panguna mine-lease area. This may explain his statement that now that a war has been
fought over it the Panguna mine “belongs to all Bougainvilleans”.41 Toroama’s present
connecon to the mine rests on the stake his gang holds in the Komeri Holdings and the fact
that he and his gang currently maintain a physical presence at the Panguna mine. To reach his
present locaon at the mine Toroama has to travel through a checkpoint (the Morgan
Juncon Roadblock) maintained by Uma’s gang, a fact that signicantly curtails Toroama’s
scope of control of the mine. Besides the vast amounts of scrap metal presently remaining at
60
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
37. Personal Email BCL General Manager Paul Coleman, 9 March 2012.
38. Personal Email BCL General Manager Paul Coleman, 9 March 2012.
39. An instance this ‘protecon’ occurred in May, 2011 when Toroama’s gang was reported as having
red shots at newly-established businesses to prevent them from compeng with their ‘client’ busi-
nesses (Post-Courier, ABG Walking Tightrope, May 27, 2011 + Informant C2).
40. In the Bougainville elecon of 2010, he came second for the South Nasioi Constuency with 707 votes
to the winner’s 817. Laukai, ‘New Dawn on Bougainville’, Elecons Results Update. In the naonal
(PNG) elecon of 2012, he came second for Central Bougainville with 18,629 votes (Toroama had the
lead for a period of me) to the winner’s 23,549. Laukai, ‘Final Count’.
41. Callick, ‘Polics: Countdown Begins for Panguna’.
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
the Panguna mine, it is not dicult to see that Toroama is likely to want to connue
maintaining his base in the area for as long as possible as he jockeys for posion in
negoaons for reopening of the mine (in which he is likely to want a security contract for his
gang). Toroama’s relaonship with Uma will doubtless connue being a source of insecurity
and instability for the area but the current scrap metal sharing arrangement appears to be
able to preserve the status quo and might be a blueprint for future mine-related
arrangements. It is, however, doubul that Toroama will be a producve force in the
negoaon of reopening of the Panguna mine unless he changes his posion on Ona’s 10
billion-kina claim “remain[ing] extant”42 and his atude towards the BCL management from
“[w]e could get the blood and spit all over his [Peter Taylor; BCL Director] face […] [t]hat’s it,
very simple […] you have not paid on the land that you are walking on”43 to something,
perhaps, less gory.
Chris Uma
Coming into the BRA Chris Uma was one of the “number of […] men [who] were engaged in
criminal acvity prior to the beginning of the Crisis” (he was convicted of a criminal charge).
Uma’s notoriety at the outset of the Crisis came from his older brother, John Ampona, who
was the putave killer of the rst PNGDF soldier to die in the Bougainville Crisis.44 Uma built
on that notoriety and made a name for himself by being an implementer of Ona’s ‘cleansing’
policy which, among other aspects of it, meant the execuon of reputed sorcerers and
spies.45 Uma stayed loyal to Ona through the ris in and the eventual split of the BRA which
paid o by propelling him to the posion of General Commander of Ona’s facon of the BRA
named the Me’ekamui Defense Force (displacing MDF’s original General Commander, Moses
Pipiro, who was removed from that posion in the midst of allegaons of an extramarital
aair involving Pipiro and Ona’s wife).46 Uma remained in that posion unl Ona’s death in
2005 which resulted in the fracturing of Ona’s gang. Uma went baka otong (‘out on his own’)
while connuing to refer to himself as the Me’ekamui Defense Force and later ‘the Original
Me’ekamui’ in order to disnguish himself from the other splinter facons of Ona’s now
defunct gang and to stake his claim to Ona’s legacy. In an aempt to aain the appearance of
government, which has always been held by Ona’s gang, and being more militarily minded,
Uma joined forces with a number of respected elders of the area, Blaise Iruniu, William
Mungta and Blaise Barasio, to form the polical wing of his gang. Uma’s gang considers itself
to be “the government of Bougainville” and dismisses the ABG as “a small group of people
who are inuenced by white men”.47
Uma has never been a part of the peace process or disarmament and no amount of eorts
have had any tangible eect on co-opng him.48 As such, he has never beneted from the
61
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
42. Callick, ‘Polics: Countdown Begins for Panguna’,
43. Thomson, ‘Blood and Treasure’.
44. Informant C2, Port Moresby,January-March, 2012, personal interview.
45. Informant C2, Port Moresby,January-March, 2012, personal interview
46. Informant C1. Arawa, Bougainville, October, 2009, personal interview. C2, Port Moresby,January-
March, 2012, personal interview.
47. Marshall, ‘A Killer Deal’, Australian Broadcasng Corporaon.
48. President Tanis’ cooperave agreement with Uma’s gang (and the other branch of the Me’ekamui)
that was hailed “historic” at the me of signing has achieved nothing other than ABG paying o Uma’s
gang to get its services past the Roadblock, a method of ‘cooperaon’ with Uma’s gang which would
have been available to the ABG, cooperave agreement or not.
largesse that came with the peace process, which others, like Toroama, so adroitly tapped. As
the pressure to deliver for his gang mounts and as paence of those loyal to Uma is wearing
thin, Uma has to display ingenuity to keep the lid on the situaon. He resents Toroama for
being “a tycoon”49 and for being constantly compared to him but rides his coaails in the
scrap metal business Toroama dominates. While Toroama brings manpower, equipment and
connecons to the table of scrap metal business, Uma’s gang, essenally, gets paid for having
an armed checkpoint which stands in Toroama’s way to the wharf from which scrap metal is
exported to internaonal markets. Uma’s gang’s other sources of income include the ‘visa
fee’ the gang charges foreign visitors to pass through the Morgan Juncon Roadblock (200
kinas (US$ 100) per visitor) and ‘the aerhours fee’ (10 kinas (US $5) charged to any vehicle
that wishes to pass through the Roadblock outside its ‘regular business hours’, and helping
small gold operators secure mining ‘rights’.50 Occasionally, Uma’s gang prots from the ABG
who pays it o to bring government services to the communies cut o by the Roadblock.51
It has been established prior that money is integral to status in Bougainville society but is not
its sole foundaon. Recognion of one’s status by an outsider too carries signicant weight.
In Uma’s case his maintenance of the Roadblock has garnered him recognion of a number of
high-prole outsiders (including that of the Australian ambassador to PNG who ceremonially
brought Uma a pig as a reconciliaon gi for Australia’s role in the Crisis).52
Uma is originally from the Kerei’nari Valley and is married into Araba village, both of which
are suciently removed from the Panguna mine-lease land to prevent him from having any
claim to the mine through the tradional rules of land tenure. Prior to Ona’s death Uma
maintained a tenuous connecon to the Panguna land through him and others loyal to Ona;
this is no longer the case. What Uma does have is the control of an armed checkpoint set up
at the gateway to Panguna.
The checkpoint makes Uma’s views on reopening of Panguna relevant. These views have
undergone drasc change in the past few years. In Ona’s lifeme and shortly aer his death
they were consistent with those of Ona, i.e. (1) mining was the source of all sorts of
disrupons in the tradional society of Bougainville; (2) no discussions of the possibility of
reopening of the Panguna mine may be held unl Bougainville is an independent country.53
Three years aer Ona’s death Uma’s posion on the issue shied to two condions: (1)
“development can [should] come rst then mining can come later”;54 and (2) “the Me’ekamui
is government [of Bougainville] and the Me’ekamui Defense Force is recognized as
authority”.55 Aer another three years Uma’s posion changed again, this me to a radical
departure from his uncompromising posions of the past to “make a clear statement to the
Australian government and the world that, today, we [he and his gang] are talking [about the
62
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
49. Informant C2, Port Moresby, Jan-March 2012, personal interview.
50. Informant C1, Arawa, Bougainville, Jan 2010, October 2009, personal interview
51. E.g. In 2007, the ABG paid out 30,000 kinas (US$ 15,000) in cash, pigs and other food for Uma’s gang’s
permission to resurface the ‘Bougainville Highway’ beyond the Morgan Juncon Roadblock.
52. ‘Rebel Leader Wants to Talk ‘ Radio Australia, (August 10, 2011) at hp://www.radioaustralia.net.au/
pacbeat/stories/201108/s3290464.htm (last accessed: February 14, 2012).
53. Kenneth, ‘Me’ekamui General Stands Ground’.
54. Marshall, ‘A Killer Deal’, Australian Broadcasng Corporaon.
55. Gridne, ‘Bougainville Landowners Call’., Australian Associated Press, December 12, 2008.
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
possibility of reopening the Panguna mine]”.56 Uma’s sudden shi to readiness to “talk” is not
supported by his gang’s ‘polical arm’ the leader of which (William Munta), speaking on
behalf of the gang in the same year, stated that the gang’s posion was “no to the re-opening
of the mine [and] let [the] Panguna mine remain closed”.57 This statement is most curious
against the backdrop of Uma’s statement that the “Panguna mine can open under the name
of Chris Uma”58 a mere four months later. While Uma is now willing to “talk”, by his own
admission, nothing has been negoated yet which presumably means that Uma’s orders on
access to the mine, worded as “[i]f anybody crosses this river just shoot it [sic], and report it
to me what you’ve done”,59 remain standing.
Uma does not have many allies in Central Bougainville: as outlined earlier his relaonship
with Toroama is a tenuous status quo and Uma is militantly opposed to the Panguna
Landowners Associaon60 with whom BCL is intent on working. Contrary to his talking the talk
of being able to “solve the problem of Bougainville”,61 Uma will not be able to walk the walk
as such would require having the alliances he does not have. That said, no negoaons to
reopen the Panguna mine will be viable without his being a part of them so long as he
maintains the roadblock unless soluons to his presence at Panguna are found which are
either not being contemplated now or for which condions presently do not exist. Being
aware of this, some actors integral to such negoaons have begun the process of building
alliances with Uma’s gang. As such, the other Me’ekamui gang in Central Bougainville, which
is composed of persons who are likely to have a claim to the Panguna land through the rules
of tradional tenure has recently reunited with Uma’s gang.62 In addion, the Panguna
landowners’ company, the Khomeri Holdings, gave Uma’s gang a 5% stake in it in recognion
of his posion, and the Australian ambassador to PNG has made overtures to Uma.63
Whether these will result in Uma being co-opted into peaceful development is not as
pernent a queson as whether a mul-billion dollar development project, such as the
reopening of the Panguna mine, can rely upon Uma’s stability long-term.
Moses Pipiro and Philip Miriori
During the acve-combat stage of the Crisis Moses Pipiro was a platoon commander in BRA’s
famed ‘A’ Company. The schism in the BRA leadership (based on the divergence of opinion on
how to further prosecute the conict provided to Pipiro an opportunity for advancement and
propelled him to the highest military posion in Ona’s splinter army, the Me’ekamui Defense
Force. Allegaons of an aair with Ona’s wife cost Pipiro the elevated posion and ejected
him from the MDF. With a small gang of supporters, Pipiro maintained his presence in the
Panguna area opposing the peace process. Ona’s death in 2005 created a succession power
63
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
56. ‘Rebel Leader Wants to Talk’, Radio Australia, August 10, 2011. Available at hp://
www.radioaustralia.net.au/pacbeat/stories/201108/s3290464.htm (last accessed: February 14, 2012).
57. Mungta, ‘A Total Disaster for the Future’.
58. ‘Rebel Leader Wants to Talk’, Radio Australia, August 10, 2011 Available at hp://
www.radioaustralia.net.au/pacbeat/stories/201108/s3290464.htm (last accessed: February 14, 2012).
59. Marshall, ‘A Killer Deal’, Australian Broadcasng Corporaon, June 17, 2008.
60. Gridne, ‘Bougainville Landowners Call’. Kenneth, ‘Bougainville Rebel Warns’, Post-Courier.
61. ‘Rebel Leader Wants to Talk’, Radio Australia, August 10, 2011. Available at hp://
www.radioaustralia.net.au/pacbeat/stories/201108/s3290464.htm (last accessed: February 14, 2012).
62. Tseraha, ‘Me’ekamui and ABG Do Deal’, Post-Courier, March 19, 2010.. Laukai, ‘Pipiro Happy’.April 20,
2011.
63. ‘Rebel Leader Wants to Talk’, Radio Australia.
struggle which ended in Uma leaving the area immediate to the Panguna mine and Ona’s
purported brother,64 Philip Miriori, and Philip Takaung declaring themselves Ona’s
successors. Miriori and Takaung brought Pipiro back to command the MDF troop severely
depleted by the departure of Uma’s loyalists.
Miriori and Takaung rebranded Ona’s Kingdom of Me’ekamui into the Me’ekamui
Government of Unity (‘MGU’) and signicantly soened Ona’s stance on the ABG resulng in
a landmark memorandum of understanding (‘the Panguna Communiqué’) in 2007. The
Panguna Communiqué signaled, in part, a complete break from Ona’s posions and, in part,
their signicant alteraon. As such, through it, the MGU denounced Uma’s checkpoint as
having “abused and misused its objecves and rules of engagement under the Me’ekamui
government” and as having the purpose “to blockade the Panguna people”,65 condemned
“the use of arms and violence”66 and acquiesced to what can, perhaps, be best termed as a
‘two polical viewpoints, one administrave structure’ arrangement with the ABG.67 In
return, even though ABG has no such authority by any constuonal provision and ABG
reciprocated by allowing the MGU to have its “own conngent plans on arms containment”68
and, of course, a promise of bringing resoluon of “social issues and development issues”,69
“nancial assistance, economic benets, development packages, good and service”,70 and
“other services”;71 all of these translate into ABG bringing money into the MGU-dominated
area, which doubtless was the main reason for this rapprochement for the MGU.
Both Pipiro and Miriori are from the mine-lease area (Pipiro is originally from Pangka village
and now lives in Mosinau village and Miriori is originally from Guava village and now lives in
Parakake village) and, as such, are likely72 to stand to benet nancially from reopening of
the mine under the tradional rules of land tenure. Pipiro and Miriori’s landowning posion
is strengthened by the fact of their physical presence in the mine-lease area and the weapons
that remain in possession of Pipiro and his gang. Therefore, Pipiro and Miriori’s views on
reopening of the mine are doubly important. These views are reasonably well arculated and
have been widely publicized. At the signing of the Panguna Communiqué MGU’s posion on
reopening of the mine was stated as requiring the existence of two condions: (1) statehood
for Bougainville; and (2) compensaon for the people of Panguna for “the death and
destrucon arising as a result of the Bougainville Conict”.73 If these condions were not
possible, the MGU pledged to agree to an alternave set of condions which consisted of
these condions: (1) the mining powers and funcons are drawn down to the ABG (from the
naonal government) and (2) a review of the “mining laws, policies, and legal agreements”.74
MGU made landowner representaon “at any talks regarding mining at Panguna”
mandatory.75
64
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
64. Informant C2, Port Moresby, February 2012, personal interview.
65. Panguna Communiqué, art. 7.
66. Panguna Communiqué, art. 6.
67. Panguna Communiqué, art. 4
68. Panguna Communiqué, art. 6.
69. Panguna Communiqué, art. 4.
70. Panguna Communiqué, art. 5.
71. Panguna Communiqué, art. 9.
72. Informant C2, Port Moresby,February, 2012, personal interview.
73. Panguna Communiqué, art. 10 (b) (i & ii).
74. Panguna Communiqué, art. 10 (b) (iii & iv).
75. Panguna Communiqué, art. 11.
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
Neither set of condions has transpired since the signing of the Panguna Communiqué.
Consequently, by the leer of the Panguna Communiqué, MGU would have been under an
obligaon to “shelve any talks on the issue of mining at Panguna”. This, however, has not
been the case as reports of the MGU inving various stakeholders to negoate have
abounded.76 In the course of these invitaons the MGU has relied on a ulitarian asseron
that it “control[s] the assets at Panguna and all natural resources within its borders”,77 rather
than on the spirit or the leer of the Panguna Communiqué. While maintaining and
developing its ‘mandate of heaven’ theories78 and making other loy declaraons,79 the MGU
has not let more earthly consideraons remain idle. MGU’s “20%” model of distribuon of
“the physical gold”80 is indicave of such consideraons.
The elements of the MGU’s posion on perming the former mine operator, BCL, to come
back may appear highly conicng to some. On the other hand, Miriori is one of the plains
in a lawsuit led in US courts against BCL’s parent company, Rio Tinto, which seeks a nding
on allegaons of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and “overs[eeing] mass
inicon of death and suering”81 and compensaon for the same. On the other hand,
despite these allegaons of horrendous crimes, the MGU invites (with Miriori issuing the
invitaon) the defendant’s subsidiary to talks on long-term cooperaon.82 MGU’s message to
Rio Tinto and BCL is suciently clear (albeit euphemized as “the internaonal groups
responsible for the previous humiliaons [sic] and contaminaons [sic] will not be welcomed
back unl all issues are resolved”):83 MGU is willing to work with them but they have to pay
their way back in at the MGU’s rate. Given that the MGU has maintained Ona’s original
claim,84 this rate is likely to be 10 billion kinas (US$5 billion). As Rio Tinto and BCL are unlikely
to want to/be able to meet this requirement, it is not dicult to foresee that the MGU’s
posion on the same is likely to have the eect of rupture on any negoaons with Rio Tinto
and BCL.
In the absence of response to its invitaons from BCL and while waing through the lawsuit’s
meandering route through the US judicial system,85 the MGU keeps itself busy by making
relavely smaller claims for compensaon upon which it hinges the reopening of the Panguna
mine.86 In the meanme, Miriori and Pipiro’s families live o of the small businesses they run
in the Panguna area, pan for gold in Panguna’s vicinity, and collect their share of the proceeds
from the sale of the BCL equipment for scrap.
65
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
76. For example Laukai, ‘Me’ekamui Invites Stakeholders’, New Dawn on Bougainville.
77. Laukai, ‘Me’ekamui Invites Stakeholders’, New Dawn on Bougainville.
78. The MGU Human Rights Declaraon. Available at (hp://governmentofmeekamui.net/index.php?
p=1_8_Human-Rights-Declaraon) (last accessed: September 24, 2012).
79. The MGU Proclamaon. Available at hp://governmentofmeekamui.net/index.php?
p=1_7_Proclamaon (last accessed: September 24, 2012).
80. The MGU Business Model. Available at hp://governmentofmeekamui.net/index.php?
p=1_10_Business-Model (last accessed: September 24, 2012).
81. Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC, No. 02-56256, 19323, 19368 (9th Cir. 2011).
82. Laukai, ‘Me’ekamui Invites Stakeholders’, New Dawn on Bougainville.
83. The MGU Natural Resources. Available at hp://governmentofmeekamui.net/index.php?
p=1_10_Business-Model (last accessed: September 24, 2012).
84. Gatana, ‘Panguna Landowners Speak out’, The Post-Courier.
85. Filed in 2008, Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC has been through a number of courts in the US judicial system with
the US Federal Court for the Ninth Circuit ruling on it most recently (October, 2011) and remanding it
to the district court (for Central District of California) for “further proceedings on the claims of geno-
cide and war crimes”.
86. Kenneth, ‘Me’ekamui Insists on Proper Burial’, The Post-Courier..
MGU exists in a dicult environment of compeon for the wealth of the Panguna mine. It is
surrounded by other gangs and groups with whom it has sought to build alliances to varying
degrees of success. MGU’s alliance with the ABG has been rocky and rife with accusaons of
the ABG overstang its authority to negoate the reopening of the Panguna mine87;
strangely, however, this alliance has been the strongest MGU has had with any group. MGU’s
alliance with Uma’s gang88 is tentave and remains a work in progress. As Toroama seeks
greater control of Panguna (through being integral to the scrap metal project), the MGU
tolerates his gang’s presence at Panguna now that the scrap metal project is ongoing. MGU
does not share much more than its geography with the Panguna Landowners Associaon
(‘PLOA’), with the level of hoslity and mutual aversion between the two groups being
palpable.89 Shortly aer Ona’s death, the MGU publicly distanced itself from Ona’s close ally,
Noah Musingku, to then disown him enrely.90 There is no reason to believe that MGU
maintains alliances or has frequent communicaons with any other gangs in Bougainville.
Noah Musingku
Noah Musingku spent the Crisis years away from Bougainville and, as such, did not
parcipate in the hoslies in any capacity. During those years Musingku had a life that
diered dramacally from that shared by his fellow-Bougainvilleans locked in a protracted
civil war:91 Musingku acquired fabulous wealth92 through a pyramid investment scheme, U-
Vistract, he ran in Papua New Guinea and other countries of the region.94 In 2002, a
concerted eort of Papua New Guinea and Australia got Musingku on the run quickly
shrinking safe harbors for him to his nave and now lawless Bougainville. Auspiciously for
Musingku, his diverse Bougainville fan base included Ona95 who was in a posion to oer
Musingku a safe haven under the protecon of his Me’ekamui gang. Ona, at the me, was in
desperate search of nancial means to sustain his gang’s claim for government of
Bougainville. Musingku convinced Ona that he would be able to deliver the much needed
wherewithal. Ona had every reason to believe Musingku who had proven his ability to
generate large amounts of money by defrauding large numbers of people in short periods of
me. In 2004, from a guest of Ona’s gang Musingku was elevated to the status of a co-equal
monarch in Ona’s fantasy kingdom.96 Thus were born Ona’s kingdom of the Me’ekamui and
Musingku’s Kingdom of Papala. As no two kingdoms can exist under the same roof for long,
Musingku moved his ‘kingdom’ to his nave village of Tonu in the Siwai District of South
66
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
87. Laukai, .Me’ekamui Invites Stakeholders’, New Dawn on Bougainville.
88. Laukai, ‘Pipiro Happy’, New Dawn on Bougainville.
89. Laukai, ‘PLOA Responds to Me’ekamui’, New Dawn on Bougainville.
90. Leer of MGU Prime Minister Raymond Hakena,November 10, 2005.‘PNG Sends Police Reinforce-
ments’, New Zealand Radio, May 15, 2006.Leer of MGU President (June, 2006).
91. Post-Courier, ‘Me’ekamui Denies Links’.
92. Cox, ‘Financing the End-Time Harvest,’ 2.
93. Ibid.
94. Cox, ‘Financing the End-Time Harvest’
95. Ona regarded U-Vistract as “Bougainvillean-owned” and “Bougainvillean-operated” and “a way for
Bougainvilleans to economic prosperity”. A BRA delegaon visited the Australian embassy in Port
Moresby to inform the Australian government that “the closure of U-Vistract had ramicaons for the
Bougainville peace process and should therefore be halted” (Stan McKenzie, Papua New Guinea Fast
Money Schemes: a Financial House of Cards Collapses, World Socialist Website.
96. This is Musingku’s interpretaon of what happened. Ona’s interpretaon is quite dierent. Asked
about this connecon to Musingku Ona replied with “[n]o, my government is outside, outside Noah
Musingku’s system […] I have nothing to do with him, no. He is free there. He is doing his own things”
McLeod, ‘Bougainville – the Man Who Would Be King’.
Bougainville shortly aer the inauguraon. Following Ona’s death, Musingku declared himself
Ona’s sole successor.97
Once in Tonu, Musingku has set up a ‘kingdom’ with all the trappings of a South Pacic cargo
cult: an airport to/from which there are no ights, a bank which accepts deposits but does
not allow withdrawals, which issues checks that cannot be cashed and promises astronomical
dividends but never pays out, and a court of law which uses the Bible as the law. All this is
ghtly wrapped in messianic prophesy, lavish promises of imminent cornucopia of
tremendous wealth, and aempts to further isolate the people of Tonu from the rest of the
world by creang a new reality for them98 through which Musingku’s life is presented as part
of the Divine Plan.99 Given this mul-faceted approach to control, Musingku has gained a
reputaon of “smooth operator” with some.100
Musingku’s ‘kingdom’ maintains an army of 30-100 men (referred to as the Me’ekamui
Defense Force and the Me’ekamui Paramilitary Police),101 some of whom are armed with
automac weapons. This army is composed of unemployed and unskilled local men who have
been paid in promises of unearthly riches and very earthly and simple meals since Musingku’s
‘kingdom’ fell on tough mes.102 Musingku has nally recently admied that there is no
money in his ‘nancial system’ or ‘kingdom’ and that the wealth acquired by operang U-
Vistract has been frozen “in convenonal banks”.103 Musingku has acknowledged that most
Bougainvilleans no longer trust him and his ‘nancial system’.104 Now that Musingku is out of
the money he did manage to salvage from the asset-freeze, the sway of his authority over his
armed gang will be tested.
Musingku has mulple reasons to connue maintaining his armed gang. These reasons range
from criminal prosecuon to numerous angry U-Vistract ‘investors’ who want their money
back.105 Musingku is safe from these for as long as Bougainville remains lawless and he
manages to maintain the loyalty of his gang.
67
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
97. Papala Chronicles, July 16, 2011, at hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/search?updated-
min=2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=2
98. Papala Chronicles, ‘Speech at the Bougainville Kina Launching Ceremony’,July 8, 2009. Available at
hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2009-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-
max=2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=5) (last accessed: March 1, 2012)
99. Papala Chronicles, Issue 4, April 23, 2005.
100. McLeod, ‘Bougainville – the Man Who Would Be King’.
101. Informants S1, S, 2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, Arawa, BougainvilleNovember, 2009, personal interviews
‘Me’ekamui Denies Links with Musingku’, Post-Courier.
102. Papala Chronicles, Papala Day Speech,Apr 23, 2010.Available at hp://papaala-
chronicles.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2011-01-
01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=4) (last accessed: March 1, 2012. Informant S5, Arawa, Bougain-
villeDec, 2011, personal interview. Papala Chronicles, Papala Day Speech,Apr 23, 2010.Available at
hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-
max=2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=4) (last accessed: March 1, 2012)
103. Papala Chronicles, Apr 23, 2010 at hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2010
-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2011-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-
results=4
104. Papala Chronicles, Jul 16, 2011, at hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2011-
01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=2 Papala Chronicles,
Issue 8, May 21, 2005
105. McLeod, ‘Bougainville – the Man Who Would Be King’, May 17, 2005. McKenzie, ‘Papua New Guinea
Fast Money Scheme’ World Socialist Website.
Musingku is originally from Tonu village which is 3 hours’ drive from the Panguna mine. He
has no plausible ancestral claim to the Panguna land under the tradional rules of land
tenure. Musingku is exceponally verbose and prolic as a writer but no evidence of his
menoning his claims to the Panguna mine has been found, and evidence to the contrary
exists.106 Had it not been for Ona’s death, Musingku could have developed a tenuous
connecon to the mine through him. Ona’s death caused fracturing of his gang led by men
who are openly hosle to him (MGU and Uma). With Musingku’s ‘kingdom’ lying away from
the mine, he does not control any area that will be vital to the mine’s operaon.107
As such, Musingku will not be integral to mine-reopening negoaons, nor is he likely to be a
threat to them so long as they do not, directly or indirectly, aect his security in his
‘kingdom’. That said, Musingku’s pyramid scheme is likely to be rejuvenated by Panguna
landowners ush with hey monthly royalty checks. In this event, the ABG will have to make
a choice whether to intervene to arrest Musingku or turn a blind eye to his operaon to
ensure that Musingku’s arrest does not become a cause of disrupon of the producon.108
Damien Koike
Damien Koike was one of the “men [who] were engaged in criminal acvity prior to the
beginning of the Crisis and the incepon of the BRA” prexed earlier in this paper. In fact, the
outbreak of the Crisis had the eect of breaking Koike out of jail. A free man again, Koike
moved back to his village in South Bougainville and joined the BRA there quickly rising to the
rank of company commander of BRA’s ‘I’ Company. Perhaps the biggest event in the history
of BRA in South Bougainville, the Kangu Beach Massacre, did not involve Koike’s troops. The
fame/infamy for this killing of some unarmed PNGDF regulars and capture of others belonged
to another BRA commander in South Bougainville, Thomas Tari. Koike grew to deeply resent
Tari for the spotlight and the ransom money109 he aained from the Kangu Beach Massacre.
Aer some inial irtaon with it, Koike rejected the peace process believing that the ming
for it was inauspicious110 and maintained his troop as the South Bougainville detachment of
Ona’s Me’ekamui Defense Force. Ona’s death and the disintegraon of his gang does not
appear to have had any visible eect on Koike whose gang was by then fully immersed in the
local power struggle in South Bougainville. Since the BPA days, Koike’s gang has been known
for banditry in South Bougainville and southern parts of Central Bougainville.
Koike now claims to have anywhere from 100 to 1,000 men111 under his command but the
real number appears to be somewhere in the vicinity of 30.112 What his gang lacks in number
68
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
106. Australian Broadcasng Corporaon (ABC) Foreign Correspondent’s report of 17 May 2005
107. Contra Australian Broadcasng Corporaon (ABC) Foreign Correspondent’s report of 17 May 2005
(video on le with author) claims that Musingku might have designs for the Mine because he
“controls the zone that surrounds the defunct but rich Panguna gold and copper mine”. The report
enrely misinterprets the power structure around Panguna and Musingku’s posion in it.
108. ABG’s previous president, James Tanis, aempted to deal with the Musingku issue by requesng that
the PNG government pardon Musingku. The request gained no tracon at the naonal level and
Tanis’ short-lived presidency was over before he could make any headway on the maer.
109. Informants S1, S2, Arawa, Bougainville, July – October, 2009, personal interview.
110. Informant S1, Arawa, Bougainville, October 2009, personal interview.
111. Laukai, ‘Ceasere in South Bougainville’, New Dawn on Bougainville.
112. Informants S1, S2, S3, S4, Arawa, Boungainville, July, October 2009 – February 2012, personal inter-
views. Jackson, Australian Broadcasng Corporaon, Bougainville Shoong, April 24 2011.
it makes up in ruthlessness, however.113 Throughout the 2000s almost all criminality in South
Bougainville was aributed to Koike’s gang.
Koike is originally from Telei village, Buin District, South Bougainville and presently lives in
Mogoroi village in Buin District that is 3 hours’ drive from the Panguna mine. This fact of his
birth and his family lineage does not create any entlement to the Panguna land for him
under the tradional rules of land tenure. Unlike the similarly situated Musingku, Koike has
shown an interest in mining. As such, Koike’s gang intermiently controlled the mining of
alluvial gold in the Deuro and Konnou constuencies of the Buin District which Koike’s band
road-blocked from the rest of the district in the good tradion of roadblocks in Bougainville.
The local landowners pushed back by organizing into an armed gang named the Wisia
Liberaon Front/Movement (‘WLF/WILMO’) led by Philip Pusua and retook the mining area
creang an armed stando with Koike.114
Aer years of armed conict and mulple deaths on both sides, Koike’s gang nally gained
the upper hand by killing Pusua115 and other WILMO leaders and ‘reconciling’ with what was
le of WILMO. This reconciliaon was ociated by the ABG President and UNDP and was de
facto Koike’s victory celebraon over WILMO. This demonstrates that Koike’s gang is
interested in Bougainville’s mineral wealth and is prepared to kill to get to it. Koike’s other
known proclivies are jealousy and desire to ‘get in on the acon’. The only ‘acon’ in
Bougainville now is the ABG’s budget. Koike has declared war on President Momis for “empty
promises”116 by launching a colorfully named operaon ‘Leader Out’ (essenally, threatening
to kill Momis if the ABG budget was not shared with him). Momis rushed to placate Koike by
oering him money under the guise of assistance with the compensaons Koike and his gang
were going to pay to the families of the WILMO members they had killed.117 It is not dicult
to foresee that if the Panguna mine becomes the main ‘acon’ in Bougainville, Koike will use
threats of violence (now that he knows that they work) to get ‘his’ slice of the pie if he feels
that his gang is “le out” by the distribuon of Panguna’s wealth. It is doubul that Koike has
an elaborate posion on reopening of the Panguna mine but what is known is that his
posion includes a requirement that “no white people” be allowed to do mining in
Bougainville.118
Koike’s gang operates in a manner that is lile dierent from the manner in which it operated
during the Crisis. Despite his gang being responsible for the bulk of killings in Bougainville
since 2006, Koike’s enemies are cabined to his immediate surroundings (the villages of
Mongai, Moikui and Sininnai). In the rest of South Bougainville, he has collaborated on a
number of occasions119 with Musingku (whom he considers “a nancial genius”120 and in
69
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
113. Informants S1, S2, S3, S4, Arawa, Buka, Bougainville, October 2009 – February 2012, personal inter-
views.
114. Informant S1 and Informant S4, Arawa, Buka, Bougainville October 2009 – January 2010, personal
interview.
115. Pacic Islands News Associaon, Movement Leader Shot Dead in Bougainville
116. ‘Rebel Wages War on ABG’, Post-Courier
117. ‘Bougainville Wants Restorave Jusce’, Radio New Zealand Internaonal. Informants N2 and N3,
Buka, Bouganiville, February 2010, personal interview.
118. Informant S1, Arawa, Bougainville, October 2009, personal interview.
119. ‘Bougainville-Fiji Men Sign Deal’, Fiji Times.
120. Informant S1, Arawa, October 2009, personal interview.
whose system he has ‘invested’). Koike’s connecon with Uma dates back to days of Ona’s
gang but there is no reason to believe that Uma exercises any measure of control over Koike
or his gang.121 Koike’s connecon with Pipiro and Miriori is equally tenuous122 and seemingly
residual. There is no reason to believe that any connecon presently exists between Koike
and Toroama. While there has been no evidence of their collaboraon, Koike and Tari have
maintained the peace reached between them in 2009.
Thomas Tari
Thomas Tari became a household name in Bougainville in 1996 when he and his platoon
ploed and helped perpetrate the Kangu Beach Massacre. The PNGDF who were not killed in
the aack were captured. Their capture resulted in a protracted negoaon process which
made Tari an important man. The newfound notoriety made Tari aspire for company
commandership. Tari moved to kill the then BRA’s ‘H’ Company commander Paul Bobby
Kiaku123 (and his two brothers)124 and take over the ‘H’ Company.
Following the split in the BRA along the peace process lines, Tari joined the pro-peace process
BRA who were led by Toroama and parcipated in hammering out of key disarmament and
weapons disposal accords.125 Once the disarmament and weapons containment process got
underway Tari was put in charge of the disarmament of the BRA in Buin. When the weapons
containment process failed towards the end of 2005, Tari retrieved some of his company’s
weapons and rearmed. Absent a polical purpose and legimacy, the remnants of his
company disintegrated into a street gang.
Rearmed, Tari embarked, along with many in Bougainville, on a pursuit of what he felt was
owed to him and his gang for ghng the war. The methods Tari employed in this pursuit are
rounely framed as the oenses of ‘piracy’, ‘blackmail’ and ‘hijacking’126 in the most of the
rest of the world but are roune in the PNG tradional culture, even if criminalized by
‘introduced’ (Western) law.
Rearmed, Tari decided to append himself to the ABG in the form of an ABG-funded gang the
Bougainville Freedom Fighters (BFF) through which the ABG sought to restore the balance of
power127 skewed by the naiveté of the BPA draers128 and the failure of the disarmament and
weapons containment process.129 ABG used Tari’s BFF in operaons against the South
Bougainville Me’ekamui (Koike and Musingku) throughout 2006 and 2007 (at which point
70
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
121. Sam Kaouna, Kieta, Bougainville, May 2009, personal interview. Informant C2, Port Moresby, February
2012, personal interview. ‘ Rebel Wages War on ABG’, Post-Courier
122. ‘Rebel Wages War on ABG’, Post-Courier
123. Informants S1, S, 2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9. Arawa, July 2009 - February 2010, personal interviews.
Maraki et al., ‘Long Peace Yumi Stanap’
124. Maraki, et al, ‘Long Peace Yumi Stanap’
125. Joint Bougainville Negoang Posion (December 14, 1999); The Rotakas Record, Joint Bougainville
Ex-Combatants Agreement on Weapons Disposal, Togarau (May 3, 2001)
126. E.g. In 2005, Tari and his gang hijacked Momis’ car to demand compensaon for an instance of
‘services’ allegedly provided to the PNG government during the war. This was not the rst me the
demand was made; Augusne Kinna, Talks on How to End Law and Order Issues Aecng South Bou-
gainville, The Naonal (November 7, 2006)
127. Informants S1, S 2, S7, S9, Arawa, July 2009 - February 2010, personal interviews.
128. Kopel, et al, ‘Firearms Possession by “Non-State Actors,” 399’,
129. Radio New Zealand Internaonal, ‘Bougainville Ready to Arm’
ABG appears to have dropped the idea of dealing with Koike and Musingku through military
means). ABG then funded reconciliaons between Tari and the South Bougainville Me’ekamui
(Koike and Musingku) in 2009 and 2010.
Tari is from Laguai village of the Buin District in South Bougainville situated 3 hours’ drive
from the Panguna mine. As such, he has no entlement to the Panguna land under the
tradional rules of land tenure. Tari is not known to have laid a claim to Panguna but he may
or may not share Toroama’s ‘we all fought for it and it now belongs to all of Bougainville’
approach to the mine. What is clear is that Tari has not found his way back to the life of a
civilian and, as many combatants, does not see himself as anyone other than commander of
BRA ‘H’ Company.130 What is also clear is that he feels that something is owed to him for his
role in the Crisis and that that something has yet to be paid. It is unlikely that Tari will be
sased by ABG-brokered overseas junkets131 in lieu of what he believes is owed to him. The
reopening of the Panguna mine and the wealth it will create are likely to reignite Tari’s
pursuit of ‘compensaon’.
Tari’s relaonship with the Me’ekamui gangs (Koike and Musingku) in South Bougainville is
that of a status quo tenuously held up by reconciliaons and unl recently by the fact that
WILMO kept Koike at bay. This situaon might change very quickly now that Koike has
defeated WILMO. There is no evidence of Tari’s interacon with Toroama, Pipiro/Miriori or
Uma on a level of strategic alliances which might be of relevance to reopening of the mine.
Conclusion
The opening, operaon and closure of the Panguna Mine and the ensued civil war have
doubtless been by far the most impacul events in Bougainville’s 33,000 years of history. It
does not take a sage or a seer to predict that what happened between 1969 and 2001 will
connue being at the forefront of Bougainvilleans’ minds for many years to come. Contrary to
its name, the Bougainville Peace Agreement of 2001 did not bring peace to Bougainville. It
brought a disarmament and weapons containment process which failed by 2006, a weak
autonomous government which has been on life support since its creaon in 2005, and the
entrenchment of the residue of civil war combatants in the form of street gangs that connue
to control half the island.132
With, perhaps, the excepon of Buka town, Bougainville has frozen in me. It is no longer in
1969 or 2001, or anywhere in between. Nor is it in 2012. The disarmament and weapons
containment process failed in 2005 and the ABG was created the same year; there has been
no signicant change since. Rephrasing the words of an American playwright, in Bougainville,
there is no present or future, it is year 2006 happening over and over again, now.133 The
existence of the gangs is a constant reminder to all Bougainvilleans and outsiders that, in the
words of Uma, “we have a ght here and it is not over”. Gang leaders like Uma have spent
their enre adult lives looking at the world through the barrel of the gun. They have had
numerous opportunies to go back to civilian life but they have consciously ignored them
71
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
130. Kinna, ‘Ex-BRA Commander Reconciles,’ The Naonal, December 21 2007
131. Laukai, ‘Tari Teses’
132. Tohui, ‘Momis to Honor Old Agreements’, The Naonal, October 21 2011.
133. O’Neill, ‘A Moon for the Misbegoen’
realizing that, in Bougainville, being a man with a gun bestows the status of power and
money whereas the life of a civilian oen gives neither.
Only a small poron of the gang members relate to the Panguna land under the tradional
rules of land tenure in Bougainville. This, however, does not mean that Toroama’s “now that
a war has been fought over it the Panguna mine belongs to all Bougainvilleans” will not strike
a chord with those who are dispossessed of the mine by the tradional rules of land tenure.
Only me will show with how many of the gang members this will resonate and how many
will be willing to step aside out of respect for the tradional rules of land tenure.
A sizable poron of the gangs exercises varying measures of control over the Panguna mine.
While there is some potenal for events in the area to recalibrate these measures, it is
unlikely that this recalibraon will be of signicant nature.
The gangs’ views on reopening of the Panguna mine are diverse, oen inconsistent within the
same gang, and oen oscillang over fairly short spans of me. There has been one constant
in these views; that constant is self-interest.134 Despite what the gangs might say in public,
self-interest is the best litmus test to gauge the truthfulness of these statements. Reconciling
these views is not as easy a task as they range from Ona’s two decades old claim for 10 billion
kinas to various other forms of compensaon to Mungta’s admonion that reopening of the
Panguna mine would be a disaster for Bougainville.135 Reconciliaon of these views, if at all
possible, may not be of lasng nature136 and may have the eect of rupture on the
producon of the reopened mine.
It has been argued that indigenous cultures are a hindrance to development.137 Whether this
claim passes the test of me or not, is not relevant to the Bougainville gangs’ views on the
Panguna mine for a very simple reason: by ‘development’ the gangs mean that someone will
come and do all the work and they will get paid simply for being there. Unl condions exist
for that someone to come in and do all the work, the gangs will keep themselves and the
people of Bougainville under permafrost and year 2006 will keep happening on Bougainville,
year aer year and again and again, now.
72
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
134. Braithwaite, et al, ‘Pillars and Shadows’ 35 .
135. Mungta, ‘A Total Disaster for the Future Bougainville Generaon’
136. Banks, ‘Understanding ‘Resource’ Conicts in Papua New Guinea’, 26
137. Macdonald, ‘“Good” governance in Pacic island states’
Bibliography
“ABG Walking Tightrope”, Post-Courier, 27 May 2011.
“Bougainville Ready to Arm Ex-Combatants if Needed for Security as Elecon Approaches”,
Radio New Zealand Internaonal, 24 March 2005.
“Bougainville Wants Restorave Jusce Approach to Seling Violence in the South”, Radio
New Zealand Internaonal, 26 August 2011.
“Bougainville-Fiji Men Sign Deal to Train Soldiers”, Fiji Times, 25 January 2006.
“Conict in Bougainville: Successes of the Bougainville Revoluonary Army; Interview with
Sam Kauona Sirivi,” NZine, 16 June 2000.
“Foreign Correspondent Report”, Australian Broadcasng Corporaon, 17 May 2005.
“Joint Bougainville Negoang Posion”, 14 December 1999.
“Me’ekamui Denies Links with Musingku,” Post-Courier, 15 June 2006.
“Me’ekamui Government of Unity Business Model”, (n.d.) hp://
governmentofmeekamui.net/index.php?p=1_10_Business-Model (last accessed: 24
September 2012)
“Me’ekamui Government of Unity Natural Resources Policy”, (n.d.)
hp://governmentofmeekamui.net/index.php?p=1_10_Business-Model (last accessed: 24
September 2012).
“Me’ekamui Government of Unity Proclamaon”, (n.d.)
hp://governmentofmeekaumui.net/index.php?p=1_10_Business-Model (last accessed: 24
September 2012).
Movement Leader Shot Dead in Bougainville”, Pacic Islands News Associaon, 18 August
2011.
“Rebel Leader Wants to Talk about Reopening Bougainville Copper Mine”, Radio Australia,
10 August 2011,
hp://www.radioaustralia.net.au/pacbeat/stories/201108/s3290464.htm (last accessed: 14
February 2012).
“Rebel Wages War on ABG”, Post-Courier, 9 May 2011.
“Rotakas Record, Joint Bougainville Ex-Combatants Agreement on Weapons Disposal”,
Togarau, 3 May 2001.
Banks, Glenn, “Understanding ‘Resource’ Conicts in Papua New Guinea”, Asia Pacic View
Point, Vol. 49 (1), 2008.
Boege, Volker, “Peacebuilding and State Formaon in Post-Conict Bougainville”, A Journal of
Social Jusce, Vol. 21, 2008.
Bes, Edwina, Bougainville AusAid Representave, Bougainville, January, 2010, personal
interview.
Braithwaite, John and Nickson, Ray, “Timing Truth, Reconciliaon, and Jusce Aer War”,
Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resoluon, Vol. 27, 2012.
Braithwaite, John, et al, Peacebuilding Compared Working Paper 6: Bougainville, The
Australian Naonal University, “Peacekeeping Compared” Series, 2009.
Braithwaite, John, et al, Pillars and Shadows: Statebuilding as Peacebuilding in Solomon
Islands, Australian Naonal University E Press, 2006.
Callick, Rowan, Polics: Countdown Begins for Panguna Mine Reopening: Bougainvilleans Key
to Mine’s Success, Island Business Internaonal, 2007.
Coleman, Paul, BCL General Manager, Personal Email, 9 March 2012
Connell, John, “The Future of an Island Microstate”, Journal of Pacic Studies, 2005.
73
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
Cox, John, “Financing the End-Time Harvest: Pyramid Schemes and Prosperity Gospels in
Papua New Guinea”, State, Society and Governance in Melanesia, Discussion Paper,
Australian Naonal University, Research School of Pacic and Asian Studies, 2009.
Filer, Colin, “The Bougainville Rebellion, the Mining Industry and the Process of Social
Disintegraon in Bougainville”, Canberra Anthropology, 1990.
Gatana Fabian, “Panguna Landowners Speak Out”, The Post-Courier, 30 March 2010
Gewertz, Deborah B., and Errington, Frederick K., Emerging Class in Papua New Guinea: the
Telling of Dierence, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Gridne, Ilya, “Bougainville Landowners Call for Mining”, Australian Associated Press, 12
December 2008.
Grin, James, “Bougainville is a Special Case”, May, James and Spriggs, Mahew (eds.), The
Bougainville Crisis, Crawford House Press, 2007.
Hawsley, Charles, “Papua New Guinea at Thirty: Late Decolonizaon and the Polical
Economy of Naon Building”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 27 (1), 2006.
Hilson, Christopher J., “Mining and Civil Conict: Revising Grievance at Bougainville”,
Minerals and Energy, Vol. 2, 2006.
Informant C1 and C3, Arawa, Bougainville, October 2009, personal interviews.
Informant C2, Port Moresby, January-March 2012, personal interview.
Informants N1, N2 and N3, Buka, Bougainville, February 2010, personal interview.
Informants S1, S, 2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9. Arawa, July, 2009-February 2010, personal
interviews.
Informants S1, S2, S3, S4, Arawa, Buka, Bougainville October, 2009-February 2012, personal
interviews.
Islam, Raqul, “Secession Crisis in Papua New Guinea: the Proclaimed Republic of
Bougainville in internaonal Law”, University of Hawaii Law Review, 1991.
Iten, Oswald, “Peace Treaty for Bougainville: First Step Toward Independence from Papua
New Guinea?”, 2001.
Jackson, Elizabeth, “Bougainville Shoong”, Australian Broadcasng Corporaon, 24 April
2011.
Kenneth, Gorethy, “Me’ekamui General Stands Ground”, Post-Courier, 17 May 2010.
Kenneth, Gorethy, “Me’ekamui Insists on Proper Burial”, The Post-Courier, 29 March 2011.
Kenneth, Gorethy, “Bougainville Rebel Warns Against Reopening Mine”, Post-Courier, 28
February 2011.
Kent, Stuart and Barne, John, “The Bougainville Polical Selement and the Prospects for
Sustainable Peace”, Polical Geography, Vol. 31, 2012.
Kinna, Augusne, “Ex-BRA Commander Reconciles”, The Naonal, 21 December 2007.
Kinna, Augusne, “Talks on How to End Law and Order Issues Aecng South Bougainville”,
The Naonal, 7 November 2006.
Kopel, David B., et al, “Firearms Possession by “Non-State Actors”: The Queson of
Sovereignty”, Texas Review of Law and Polics, Vol. 8, 2004.
Laukai, Aloysius, “Ceasere in South Bougainville”, New Dawn on Bougainville, 3 December
2011.
Laukai, Aloysius, “Tari Teses”, New Dawn on Bougainville, 1 November 2010.
Laukai, Aloysius,”Elecons Results Update”, New Dawn on Bougainville, 26 May 2010.
Laukai, Aloysius, “Final Count”, New Dawn on Bougainville 30 July 2012.
74
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
Laukai, Aloysius, “Me’ekamui Invites Stakeholders to Panguna Mine Talks”, New Dawn on
Bougainville, 29 May 2011.
Laukai, Aloysius, “Pipiro Happy”, New Dawn on Bougainville, 20 April 2011.
Laukai, Aloysius, “PLOA Responds to Me’ekamui”, New Dawn on Bougainville, 1 June 2011.
Macdonald, Barrie, “Good” governance in Pacic island states”, Larmour, Peter (ed.),
Governance in Reform in the South Pacic, 1998.
Maraki, Pakoa, et al, “Long Peace Yumi Stanap”, Adams, Rebecca (ed.), Peace on Bougainville:
Truce Monitoring Group: Gudpela Nius Bilong Peace, 2002.
Marshall, Steve, “A Killer Deal”, Australian Broadcasng Corporaon, 17 June 2008.
McKenzie, Stan, “Papua New Guinea Fast Money Schemes: a Financial House of Cards
Collapses”, World Socialist Website, 6 July 2000, hp://www.wsws.org/en/
arcles/2000/07/png-j06.html (last accessed: 5 May 2013).
McLeod, Shane, “Bougainville – the Man Who Would Be King”, Foreign Correspondent, 17
May 2005.
“Me’ekamui Denies Links with Musingku”, Post-Courier, 15 June 2006.
Memorandum of Understanding between the Me’ekamui Government of Unity, the People of
Ioro, and the Autonomous Bougainville Government, the Panguna Communiqué,
2007.
Mungta, William, “A Total Disaster for the Future Bougainville Generaon”, April 2011.
Musingku. Noah, “Papala Day Speech”, Papala Chronicles, 23 April 2010, hp://papaala-
chronicles.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2010-01-01T00:00:00-
08:00&updated-max=2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=4), (last accessed: 3
October 2012).
Musingku. Noah, “Speech at the Bougainville Kina Launching Ceremony”, Papala Chronicles,
July 8 2009, hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2009-01-
01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=5) (last
accessed: 1 March 2012).
Musingku. Noah, Papala Chronicles, 16 July 2011, hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/
search?updated-min=2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2012-01-
01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=2 (last accessed: 3 October 2012).
Musingku. Noah, Papala Chronicles, 16 July 2011, hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/
search?updated-min=2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2012-01-
01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=2 (last accessed: 3 October 2012).
Musingku. Noah, Papala Chronicles, 23 April 2010, hp://papaala-chronicles.blogspot.com/
search?updated-min=2010-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2011-
01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=4 (last accessed: 3 October 2012).
Newell, Virginia and Sheehy, Benedict, “Corporate Militaries and States: Actors, Interacons,
and Reacons”, Texas Internaonal Law Journal, Vol. 41, 2006.
O’Neill, Eugene, A Moon for the Misbegoen, New York: Random House, 1947.
“PNG Sends Police Reinforcements to Bougainville Following Clashes”, New Zealand Radio, 15
May 2006.
Regan, Anthony J., “Current Development in the Pacic: Causes and Course of the
Bougainville Conict,” Journal of Pacic History, Vol. 3 (3), 1998.
Regan, Anthony J., “The Bougainville Polical Selement and the Prospects for Sustainable
Peace”, Pacic Economic Bullen, Vol. 17, 2002.
Sam Kauona, Kieta, Arawa, Bougainville, April 2009, personal interview.
75
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC, No. 02-56256, 19323, 19368 (9th Cir. 2011).
Schimmel, Jorg, Program Specialist for Prevenon and Recovery of the UNDP PNG Country
Oce, Port Moresby, February 2012, personal interview.
Spark, Natascha and Bailey, Jackie, ‘“Disarmament in Bougainville”: ‘Guns in Boxes’’,
Internaonal Peacekeeping, Vol. 12 (4), 2006.
Strathern, Andrew J., and Stewart, Pamela J., “The Problems of Peace-Makers in Papua New
Guinea: Modalies of Negoaon and Polics”, Cornell Internaonal Law Journal,
Vol. 30, 1997.
Tanis, James, “Reconciliaon: My Side of the Island”, Weaving Consensus: the Papua New
Guinea-Bougainville Peace Process, 2002.
The Me’ekamui Government of Unity Human Rights Declaraon, (n.d.) hp://
governmentofmeekamui.net/index.php?p=1_8_Human-Rights-Declaraon) (last
accessed: 24 September 2012).
Thomson, Brian, Blood and Treasure, Special Broadcasng Service Australia, 26 June 2011.
Tohui, Joyce, “Momis to Honor Old Agreements”, The Naonal, 21 October 2011.
Toroama, “Leer to Ona”, 11 March 2003.
Tseraha, Peterson, “Me’ekamui and ABG Do Deal to Work Together”, Post-Courier, 19 March
2010.
Volker Boege, “How to Maintain Peace and Security in Post-Conict High Polical Order – the
Case of Bougainville”, Journal of Internaonal Peacekeeping, Vol. 14, 2010.
White, Heather G., “Including Local Communies in the Negoaon of Mining Agreements:
the OK Tedi Example”, Transnaonal Lawyer, Vol. 8, 1995.
76
The Gangs of Bougainville: Seven Men, Guns and a Copper Mine
Journal of Conflict
Transformation & Security
www.cesran.org
Editor-in-Chief:
Ozgur TUFEKCI CESRAN International, UK
Executive Editor:
Husrev TABAK CESRAN International, UK
Managing Editor:
Birgit BRAUER, Dr. CESRAN International, UK
Annett RICHTER CESRAN International, UK
Book Review Editor:
Kadri Kaan RENDA, Dr. CESRAN International, UK
Assistant Editor:
Sasa CVRLJAK CESRAN International, UK
Associate Editors:
Can ERBIL, Assoc. Prof. Boston College, USA
Bayram GUNGOR, Prof. Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey
Hakan YILMAZKUDAY, Assist. Prof. Florida International University, USA
I S S N : 2 0 4 1 - 1944
Editorial Board:
Sener AKTURK, Dr. Harvard University, USA
William BAIN, Dr. Aberystwyth University, UK
Alexander BELLAMY, Prof. Uni. of Queensland, Australia
Richard BELLAMY, Prof. University College London, UK
Andreas BIELER, Prof. University of Nottingham, UK
Pınar BILGIN, Assoc. Prof. Bilkent University, Turkey
Ken BOOTH, Prof. Aberystwyth University, UK
Stephen CHAN, Prof. SOAS, University of London, UK
Nazli CHOUCRI, Prof. MIT, USA
John M. DUNN, Prof. University of Cambridge, UK
Kevin DUNN, Prof. Hobart and William Smith Colleges, USA
Mine EDER, Prof. Bogazici University, Turkey
Ertan EFEGIL, Assoc. Prof. Sakarya University, Turkey
Ayla GOL, Dr. Aberystwyth University, UK
Stefano GUZZINI, Prof. Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Elif I. HAFALIR, Assist. Prof. Carnegie Mellon University, USA
David HELD, Prof. London School of Economics, LSE, UK
Raymond HINNEBUSCH, Prof. University of St Andrews, UK
Naim KAPUCU, Assoc. Prof. University of Central Florida, USA
Fahri KARAKAYA, Prof. Uni. of Massachusetts Dartmouth, USA
Abdulhamit KIRMIZI, Dr. SOAS, University of London, UK
Cécile LABORDE, Prof. University College London, UK
Ziya ONIS, Prof. Koc University, Turkey
Alp OZERDEM, Prof. Coventry University, UK
Oliver RICHMOND, Prof. University of St Andrews, UK
Ian TAYLOR, Prof. University of St Andrews, UK
Murat TUMAY, Dr. Selcuk University, Turkey
Talat ULUSSEVER, Assist. Prof. King Fahd Uni., S. Arabia
Ali WATSON, Prof. University of St Andrews, UK
Stefan WOLFF, Prof. University of Birmingham, UK
International Advisory Board:
Yasemin AKBABA, Assist. Prof. Gettysburg College, USA
Mustafa AYDIN, Prof. Kadir Has University, Turkey
Ian BACHE, Prof. University of Sheeld, UK
Mark BASSIN, Prof. University of Birmingham, UK
Mehmet DEMIRBAG, Prof. University of Sheeld, UK
Stephen Van EVERA, Prof. MIT, USA
John GLASSFORD, Assoc. Prof. Angelo State University, USA
Bulent GOKAY, Prof. Keele University, UK
Burak GURBUZ, Assoc. Prof. Galatasaray University, Turkey
Tony HERON, Dr. University of Sheeld, UK
John M. HOBSON, Prof. University of Sheeld, UK
Jamal HUSEIN, Assist. Prof. Angelo State University, USA
Murat S. KARA, Assoc. Prof. Angelo State University, USA
Michael KENNY, Prof. University of Sheeld, UK
Gamze G. KONA, Dr. Foreign Policy Analyst, Turkey
Scott LUCAS, Prof. University of Birmingham, UK
Christoph MEYER, Dr. King’s College London, UK
Kalypso NICOLAIDIS, Prof. University of Oxford, UK
Bill PARK, Mr. King’s College London, UK
Jenik RADON, Prof. Columbia University, USA
Ibrahim SIRKECI, Prof. Regent’s College London, UK
Claire THOMAS, Dr. University of Sheeld, UK
Brian WHITE, Prof. University of Sheeld, UK
M. Hakan YAVUZ, Assoc. Prof. University of Utah, USA
Birol YESILADA, Prof. Portland State University, USA
Interdisciplinary
Muldisciplinary
Peer-reviewed
Academic Journal
by CESRAN
(Centre for Strategic Research and Anal-
ysis)
www.cesran.org/jga
I S S N : 2 0 4 1 - 1944
I S S N : 2 0 4 1 - 1944
Academic Index
Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)
Columbia International Affairs Online (CIAO)
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
EBSCO Publishing Inc.
EconLit
EconPapers
IDEAS
Index Copernicus
Index Islamicus
Infomine
International Bibliography of Book Reviews of Schorlarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences (IBR)
International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences (IBZ)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
International Relations and Security Network (ISN)
Lancaster Index to Defence & International Security Literature
Peace Palace Library
Research Papers in Economics (RePEc)
Social Sciences Information Space (SOCIONET)
Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory
Abstracting/Indexing
Interdisciplinary | Multidisciplinary | Peer-reviewed | Academic Journal
by CESRAN
(Centre for Strategic Research and Analysis)
www.cesran.org/jga