ArticlePDF Available

Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Use

PLOS
PLOS One
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Psychologists typically rely on self-report data when quantifying mobile phone usage, despite little evidence of its validity. In this paper we explore the accuracy of using self-reported estimates when compared with actual smartphone use. We also include source code to process and visualise these data. We compared 23 participants' actual smartphone use over a two-week period with self-reported estimates and the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale. Our results indicate that estimated time spent using a smartphone may be an adequate measure of use, unless a greater resolution of data are required. Estimates concerning the number of times an individual used their phone across a typical day did not correlate with actual smartphone use. Neither estimated duration nor number of uses correlated with the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale. We conclude that estimated smartphone use should be interpreted with caution in psychological research.
Content may be subject to copyright.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare
Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Use
Sally Andrews
1
*, David A. Ellis
2,3
, Heather Shaw
3
, Lukasz Piwek
4
1Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2Department of
Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 3School of Psychology, University of
Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom, 4Faculty of Business and Law, University of the West of England, Bristol,
United Kingdom
*sally.andrews@ntu.ac.uk
Abstract
Psychologists typically rely on self-report data when quantifying mobile phone usage,
despite little evidence of its validity. In this paper we explore the accuracy of using self-
reported estimates when compared with actual smartphone use. We also include source
code to process and visualise these data. We compared 23 participantsactual smartphone
use over a two-week period with self-reported estimates and the Mobile Phone Problem
Use Scale. Our results indicate that estimated time spent using a smartphone may be an
adequate measure of use, unless a greater resolution of data are required. Estimates con-
cerning the number of times an individual used their phone across a typical day did not cor-
relate with actual smartphone use. Neither estimated duration nor number of uses
correlated with the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale. We conclude that estimated smart-
phone use should be interpreted with caution in psychological research.
Introduction
Around 2 billion people use smartphones across the globe, with over half the population in
developed countries relying on them daily [1]. This ubiquity means that there is the potential
for objective smartphone data to be used to address research questions in the real world [2].
Indeed, there has been a rapid increase in the number of publications examining the relation-
ship between smartphone use, personality, cognition, health, and behaviour e.g. [38]. Despite
this, smartphones themselves have yet to become a standard item in the psychologists research
toolbox, and little is known about the validity of self-reported estimates of smartphone use.
Miller recently [9] highlighted how important it is for social science researchers to be cur-
rent with new developments in smartphone research methods. Perhaps the biggest barrier to
exploring the objective (actual) use of smartphone data includes developing suitable apps and
the appropriate tools for processing, analysing and visualising big-data sets [10]. Whereas open
source software to create Android apps is freely available for those with no programming expe-
rience [11], there remains no open source software for analysing and visualising the resulting
data.
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 1/9
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Andrews S, Ellis DA, Shaw H, Piwek L
(2015) Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare
Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Use. PLoS
ONE 10(10): e0139004. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0139004
Editor: Jakob Pietschnig, Universitat Wien,
AUSTRIA
Received: June 24, 2015
Accepted: September 8, 2015
Published: October 28, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Andrews et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are
credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was funded by RIF2014-31 -
Research Investment Fund (University of Lincoln)
(http://www.lincoln.ac.uk/home/research/
researchsupport/researchinvestment/). The funders
had no role in study design, data collection and
analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
While self-report data can be collected successfully in situations where it is difficult to obtain
objective data, this may not be an appropriate measure when it comes to estimating smart-
phone use. It remains possible that estimates are sufficient for some research questions. but
much of the cognitive literature on time-perception suggests we are poor at estimating such
durations [12]. Any subjective estimate is also likely to ignore rapid, yet pervasive, checking
behaviours [13].
Here we propose that a simple measurerecording when the phone is in usecan provide
a vast array of information about an individual's daily routine. We describe and explore differ-
ent metrics for objective evaluation of smartphone data, and what this can reveal about smart-
phone use. We include source code for processing, visualising and analysing objective
smartphone data, which can be used by those with little to no programming knowledge. As an
applied example, we then explore the claim that people engage in habitual smartphone check-
ing behaviours, by correlating self-report smartphone use estimates with actual smartphone
use and standardised measures of problem mobile phone use [14]. We finally consider other
research questions that could be explored with this methodology.
Method
Participants
Twenty-nine participants were recruited (17 female, mean age = 22.52, range = 1833). All par-
ticipants owned Android smartphones and consisted of staff and students at the University of
Lincoln. A priori calculations suggest this number to be adequate for finding a moderate corre-
lation between actual and self-reported use, so we stopped collecting after this number was
reached. The study conformed to the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki. All par-
ticipants provided written and oral informed consent after being advised of the purpose of the
study, and the type of data being collected. Approval for the project was obtained from the
School of Psychology Research Ethics Committee at the University of Lincoln. All participants
were reimbursed a small fee (£10) for their time. Two participants were excluded as they had
technological problems partway through the study, while four additional participants were
excluded from the analysis for not providing all self-report estimates.
Materials
Smartphone Application: We developed an Android smartphone app using Funf in a Box [11].
Apps collecting data from Android devices are generated by selecting sensors, and specifying
sampling frequency. We selected the screen on/off option, resulting in a small app that records
a timestamp when a use starts and ends. Data is encrypted and uploaded to a server over Wi-Fi
(for more details see [11]). Our app simply recorded a timestamp when the phone became
active, and a second when this interaction ended (typically screen use, although this also
includes processor intensive activities including calls and playing music).
Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (MPPUS): This questionnaire consists of 27 items, which
have previously demonstrated positive correlations with self-reported mobile phone use [14].
The MPPUS remains a highly cited scale across health and psychological research [1519], and
has been used as an additional means of measuring mobile phone use more generally [6,20,
21]) (Cronbach's alpha = .89 for standardised items in our sample).
Procedure
On arrival at the lab, a smartphone application was installed on participants' smartphones.
They were then sent a standardised SMS that they were asked to relay back to the experimenter,
Whats Going On (and Off) with Smartphones?
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 2/9
to determine the length of time taken to check a message. Time taken was recorded from the
notification tone until the message had been relayed. Participants were asked to record an esti-
mate each evening of how long they used their phone that day, for the next 14 consecutive
days. We asked participants to only estimate their phone use during periods where their phone
screen was switched on, as the Funf on-off sensor was advertised as measuring screen state.
However, during testing, it was discovered that the on-off sensor actually measured whether
the phone was in an interactive state, which included activities such as phone calls and listening
to music, commonly done with the screen switched off. While we did not analyse the diary
data further, it is possible that the process influenced participantslater estimations of their
phone use. When participants returned to the lab after 14 days, they were asked to estimate
how much they used their phone on average each day (including calls and listening to music).
This measure was used in subsequent analyses of subjective estimates. They were then asked to
estimate how many times they use their phone each day (number of uses), and finally were
asked to complete the MPPUS. The app was then uninstalled from their device.
Data from the app were converted into a comma separate values file using Funf processing
scripts. This file was further processed using source code to calculate descriptive statistics and
barcode visualisations (as shown in Fig 1; see S1 Appendix for source code). The scripts allow
the user to explore different times of day (morning, afternoon, evening, and night), and to
explore different metrics associated with checking behaviours of different durations (N.B. the
source code requires Matlab 2014b or later). These can be calculated separately for each day, or
across the entire duration of a study. We use descriptive statistics for the first 14 days of the
study throughout. Some timestamps showed very long single use durations (i.e. >5 hours).
Another limitation to the application is that when the phone switches off, the app does not
record the screen turning off. When the phone is turned on again, it also does not record the
screen turning on. This results in a seemingly long onduration, when the phone itself was
actually turned off. It was therefore unclear whether long durations during the day were as a
result of the phone being in use (e.g. listening to music, or watching a film), or whether the
Fig 1. Barcode of smartphone use over two weeks. Black areas indicate times where the phone was in use and Saturdays are indicated with a red dashed
line. Weekday alarm clock times (and snoozing) are clearly evident.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004.g001
Whats Going On (and Off) with Smartphones?
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 3/9
phone was turned off. As it is impossible to be sure that all long durations were because of this,
we retain these data in all analyses, and use median values when calculating an average values
for each day, as this is a more accurate summary of the average use length. We then use these
values to calculate the mean use length for each participant. We established that occasions
when this occurred overnight were the result of the phone being turned off. The included
source code (S1 Appendix) enables the visualisation of the data for each participant across all
days, or to create an average heatmapof one day, seven days, or weekdays and weekends (not
shown here).
Results
Objective Data
The mean daily number of uses and the mean length of these durations (including a median
length for all the durations in a day) and a mean daily duration of phone use (total daily dura-
tion) were calculated for each participant. Participants used their phones a mean of 84.68 times
each day (SD = 55.23) and spent 5.05 hours each day using their smartphone (SD = 2.73).
Length of use was, unsurprisingly, highly skewed, with 55% of all uses less than 30 seconds in
duration (see Fig 2).
We classify checksas uses up to 15 seconds in duration. To explore these behaviours more
closely, we analysed the percentage of phone interactions with durations under 15 seconds.
These showed three distinct periods of increased use; from 1-3s, 5-6s, and 1011 seconds. Fig 3
shows a histogram of such checks (in 0.5 second bins). In the lab, mean time taken to unlock
the phone and read a short message was 8.42s (SD = 1.53). With added distractions outside the
lab, the 10-11s time bin is likely to reflect the time taken to read a short message, check the
time or other notifications. We explored whether any of these durations could result from the
Fig 2. Percentage of uses categorised by duration. This illustrates the highly skewed nature of smartphone usage.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004.g002
Whats Going On (and Off) with Smartphones?
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 4/9
display turning itself off, after a period of being idle. However, results indicated that these
default times did not explain any spike in use (default display off times: mean
LOCKED
=
274.88s, SD
LOCKED
= 842.85s; mean
UNLOCKED
= 282.06s, SD
UNLOCKED
= 524.33s).
We also compared phone use at different times of day; night (00:0006:00), morning
(06:0012:00), afternoon (12:0018:00), and evening (18:0024:00), as shown in Fig 4. In this
comparison we calculate median duration lengthi.e. the median amount of time a user
engaged with their phone before turning the display offfor each participant. Finally, we
explored the total duration spent using the phone at each time of day. For the purposes of this
analysis, phone uses that spanned two time windows (e.g. commencing in the morning and
ending in the afternoon) was allocated to the time period in which it originated.
Three one-way repeated measures ANOVAs (Time of Day; morning, afternoon, evening,
night) were calculated separately for total daily duration, use length, and number of uses. Data
from one participant was removed from total daily duration and median use length analyses, as
they had no data from the night time period. There was a significant difference in the number
of phone uses at different times of day (F(3, 78) = 34.62, p<.001, η
ρ
2
= .571). Tukey's LSD
comparisons revealed more individual uses in the afternoon and evening than in the morning
Fig 3. Number of checks in 0.5 second bins across all participants over a 15 second period. Three
spikes of checking duration are visible.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004.g003
Fig 4. Participantsmean number of phone uses (a), mean total duration (b), and mean duration length
(c) at different times of day. Error bars show 1 SE from the mean.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004.g004
Whats Going On (and Off) with Smartphones?
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 5/9
and at night (all ps<.001), that there were more uses in the morning than at night (p<.001),
but that there were no differences in the number of uses between afternoon and evening (p=
.083). Fig 4a shows these differences. There were no significant differences in total daily dura-
tion at different times of day (F(3, 78) = .94, p= .414, η
ρ
2
= .036; see Fig 4b, nor in median use
length (F(3, 78) = 2.33, p= .081, η
ρ
2
= .082; see Fig 4c).
Comparison of objective and subjective measures of smartphone use
We conducted paired-samples t-tests and Pearson correlations to compare actual and esti-
mated smartphone use (see Table 1). For number of phone uses, there were far more actual
phone uses (84.68) than were estimated (37.20; t(23) = 3.93, p<.001), and no significant corre-
lation between the two (r(21) = .11, p= .610) indicating that estimated number of phone uses
does not reflect actual number of uses. For total daily duration there was no significant differ-
ence between actual (5.05 hours) and estimated use (4.12 hours; t(22) = 1.78, p= .086) and
there was a moderate positive correlation between the two (p= .02). This suggests that esti-
mated duration of use may have reasonable relative validity.
We finally compared scores on the MPPUS with objective and estimated smartphone use
and checks using Pearson's correlations (see Table 1). None of these analyses revealed any sig-
nificant relationships (ps>.15). Ten participants scored more than 2SD greater than Bianchi
& Phillips[14] mean, indicating problem use.
Discussion
Estimated levels of smartphone use have previously been related to sleep, interpersonal rela-
tionships, driving safety, and personality [5,7,22,23]. Here we observe that self-reported esti-
mates of phone use relate moderately to actual behavior in such situations. Conversely,
estimated number of checks showed no clear relationship with actual uses; indeed, actual uses
amounted to more than double the estimated number. It is possible that our limited sample
size obscured a larger effect size. Nevertheless, we suggest that estimated use may not be suffi-
cient if a higher resolution of data are required, but that estimates of total use are likely to be
adequate for many research designs. However, for exploring checking behaviours, estimated
number of uses show little reliability for measuring actual uses.
The quantity of short checking behaviours we observed are comparable with those found by
Oulasvirta and colleagues [24], who collected data in 2009. Smartphone use has become much
more prevalent in the intervening six years, and it would be easy to assume that smartphone
use would increase accordingly. However, our data indicate that checking behaviours are no
more prevalent now than they were six years ago. It is interesting to note that people have little
awareness of the frequency with which they check their phone. Oulasvirta and colleagues made
this claim in 2012, however this is the first paper to demonstrate that rapid mobile phone inter-
actions are habitual [25]. While phone interactions under thirty seconds have previously been
classified as 'checking behaviours', our data suggest that habitual goal-and reward-based
actions are likely to be less than 15 seconds in duration when it comes to checking the time or
message notifications.
In our study, the MPPUS did not correlate with any measure of phone useactual or esti-
mated. The MPPUS is used not only as a measure of problem phone use, but also as an addi-
tional measure of phone use more generally. To determine validity of the MPPUS for this
purpose, we correlated objective phone use with MPPUS scores. This is not to say that the
MPPUS lacks validity, but rather that people use smartphones for a variety of reasons [26], and
that increased use does not necessitate a problem in itself [27]. It may seem reasonable to
assume that those who spend a long time on their phone have problem mobile phone use.
Whats Going On (and Off) with Smartphones?
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 6/9
However, heavy users are not necessarily the same as problem users. While it is easy to conflate
heavy use with problem use, research into smartphone use should identify heavy use and prob-
lem use independently of one another (e.g. [8]).
Examining how much people actually use their smartphone can be useful for a variety of
applications. For example, all except one of our participants used their phone as an alarm
clock, and most reported that they always use their phone last thing before sleeping. These
usage patterns therefore provide a non-invasive indication of sleep length, which has the poten-
tial to augment sleep diary data [28]. Furthermore, while we have considered usage patterns
across the day, a further extension to this analysis would be to consider how these patterns
across different days of the week. This is likely to have additional social and occupational con-
sequences [29].
Trull and Ebner-Priemer [9] and Miller [10] argue that smartphone data have a great deal
to offer as a research tool in psychology, yet comparatively little research utilises objective
smartphone data. Here we show that estimates of smartphone use have a place within current
research, but we caution that its validity is limited and should be complimented by measure-
ments of real behaviour. We also provide the first method to automatically sample and easily
visualise the frequency of smartphone use with a simple background app. We hope that meth-
ods described in this paper will help overcome some barriers to accessing smartphone data for
research in psychology and that it will form a foundation to build upon in the coming years.
Supporting Information
S1 Appendix. Source Code for analysing smartphone use data. Source code, example
screenprobe.csv data file, and README.txt for processing, visualising and analysing smart-
phone use data. csv2data.mconverts ScreenProbe.csv to usable data, while barcode.mallows
visualisations to be generated. descriptives.mgenerates descriptive statistics that can be used for
quantitative analysis. Source code requires Matlab version 2014b or later, but does not require
any specific toolboxes.
(ZIP)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SA HS DAE. Performed the experiments: HS. Ana-
lyzed the data: SA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SA. Wrote the paper: SA
DAE HS LP.
References
1. McIlroy T. Planet of the phones. The Economist. 2015. Available: http://www.economist.com/news/
leaders/21645180-smartphone-ubiquitous-addictive-and-transformative-planet-phones
Table 1. Correlation matrix of MPPUS scores, and actual and estimated smartphone use.
Estimated uses Actual uses Estimated duration Actual duration
Actual uses 0.11
Estimated duration 0.02 -0.03
Actual duration 0.23 0.12 0.47
a
MPPUS 0.03 0.29 0.17 0.30
a
p= .02
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004.t001
Whats Going On (and Off) with Smartphones?
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 7/9
2. MacKerron G, Mourato S. Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change.
2013; 23(5): 9921000.
3. Clayton R, Leshner G, Almond A. The Extended iSelf: The Impact of iPhone Separation on Cognition,
Emotion, and Physiology. J Comput-Mediat Comm. 2015; 20(2): 119135.
4. Dolev-Cohen M, Barak A. Adolescentsuse of Instant Messaging as a means of emotional relief. Com-
puters in Human Behavior. 2013; 29(1): 5863.
5. Feldman G, Greeson J, Renna M, Robbins-Monteith K. Mindfulness predicts less texting while driving
among young adults: Examining attention- and emotion-regulation motives as potential mediators. Per-
sonality and Individual Differences. 2011; 51(7): 856861. PMID: 22031789
6. Walsh S, White K, Young R. Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between
Australian youth and their mobile phones. Journal of Adolescence. 2008; 31(1): 7792. PMID:
17560644
7. Walsh S, White K, Young RMcD. Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people's
involvement with their mobile phones. Aus J of Psych. 2010; 62(4): 194203.
8. White A, Buboltz W, Igou F. Mobile phone use and sleep quality and length in college students. Interna-
tional Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2011; 1(18): 5158.
9. Miller G. The Smartphone Psychology Manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012; 7(3):
221237. doi: 10.1177/1745691612441215 PMID: 26168460
10. Trull T, Ebner-Priemer U. The Role of Ambulatory Assessment in Psychological Science. Current
Directions in Psychological Science. 2014; 23(6): 466470. PMID: 25530686
11. Aharony N, Pan W, Ip C, Khayal I, Pentland A. Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mecha-
nisms in the real world. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 2011; 7(6): 643659.
12. Grondin S. Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and
theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2010; 72(3): 561582.
13. Rachman S. A cognitive theory of compulsive checking. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2002; 40
(6): 625639. PMID: 12051482
14. Bianchi A, Phillips J. Psychological Predictors of Problem Mobile Phone Use. CyberPsychology &
Behavior. 2005; 8(1): 3951.
15. Hadlington LJ. Cognitive failures in daily life: Exploring the link with Internet addiction and problematic
mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015; 51: 7581.
16. Leung L. Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among
adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Children and Media. 2008; 2(2): 93113.
17. Lin TTC, Chiang Y, Jiang C. Sociable people beware? Investigating smartphone vs non-smartphone
dependency symptoms among young Singaporeans. Social Behavior and Personality. 2015; 43 (7):
12091216.
18. Öz F, ArslantaşD, Buğrul N, Koyuncu T, Ünsal A. Evaluation of problematic use of mobile phones and
quality of sleep among high school students. International Journal of Human Sciences. 2015; 12(1):
226235.
19. Takao M, Takahashi S, and Kitamura M. Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use.
CyberPsychology & Behavior 12.5 (2009): 501507.
20. Kalhori SM, Mohammadi MR, Alavi SS, Jannatifard F, Sepahbodi G, Reisi MB, et al. Validation and
Psychometric Properties of Mobile Phone Problematic Use Scale (MPPUS) in University Students of
Tehran. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry. 2015; 10(1): 2531. PMID: 26005477
21. Lopez-Fernandez O, Honrubia-Serrans ML, Freixa-Blanxart M. Adapting the Mobile Phone Problem
Use Scale for the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale for adolescents: The English Version. Personality
and Individual Differences. 2014; 60: S24S47.
22. Butt S, Phillips J. Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior.
2008; 24(2): 346360.
23. Ehrenberg A, Juckes S, White K, Walsh S. Personality and Self-Esteem as Predictors of Young Peo-
ple's Technology Use. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2008; 11(6):7 39741.
24. Oulasvirta A, Rattenbury T, Ma L, Raita E. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Pers Ubiquit
Comput. 2011; 16(1): 105114.
25. Lally P, van Jaarsveld C, Potts H, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the
real world. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2009; 40(6): 9981009.
26. Smith A. U.S. Smartphone Use in 2015. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. 2015. Avail-
able: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
Whats Going On (and Off) with Smartphones?
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 8/9
27. Billieux J. Problematic use of the mobile phone: a literature review and a pathways model. Current Psy-
chiatry Reviews. 2012; 8(4): 299307.
28. Vallières A, Moran C. Actigraphy in the assessment of insomnia. Journal of Sleep. 2003; 26(7): 902
906. PMID: 14655927
29. Ellis DA, Wiseman R, Jenkins R. Mental representations of weekdays. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(8):
e0134555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134555 PMID: 26288194
Whats Going On (and Off) with Smartphones?
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139004 October 28, 2015 9/9
... One challenging issue in this field involves potential discrepancies between self-reported and objectively measured SMA time, raising concerns about measurement bias and reliability of self-reported SMA estimates 13 . Much research on SMA relies on selfreported retrospective recall, yet mounting data suggest that individuals may lack insight into their actual SMA patterns [14][15][16][17][18] . As with selfreport studies generally, self-reported SMA is vulnerable to multiple types of biases involving recall, heuristic distortions, and social desirability 2,3,13,19,20 , particularly in adolescents with potentially limited introspective accuracy to estimate usage durations across multiple platforms 21 . ...
... The finding implies that social media use may be reliably captured by EARS-logged data. Consistent with previous research 14,15,45,46 , we observed moderate positive correlations between EARSlogged and self-reported use of social media. The mean differences in social media use between self-reported and EARS-logged measures were not significant for the 3-week sensing period but were significant when compared to 12-month retrospective reports. ...
Article
Full-text available
Concerns about the accuracy of self-reported screen time persist due to discrepancies with objective measures. This study compared passive smartphone tracking via the “Effortless Assessment of Risk States’’ (EARS) app with self-reported screen time from 495 adolescents. Based on self-reports, 94.26% of social media use occurred on smartphones. EARS-recorded social media use was higher (1.64 ± 1.93 h) than past-year self-report (1.44 ± 1.97 h; p = 0.037) but similar to post-sensing self-report (1.63 ± 1.93 h; p = 0.835). Higher picture vocabulary scores were associated with lower odds of under-reporting social media use (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93–0.99). Both self-reported ( β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01–0.11) and EARS ( β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03–0.12) measures correlated with externalizing symptoms. They were also correlated with social media addiction (self-reported: β = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.10–0.20; EARS: β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01–0.11). However, past-year self-report uniquely correlated with internalizing symptoms ( β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01–0.09) and video game addiction ( β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01–0.10). These findings highlight the value of integrating self-report and objective measures in screen media use research.
... The observed finding that males reported higher smartphone usage than females aligns with previous research by Elhai et al. (2017) and Van Deursen et al. (2015), suggesting that men may engage more frequently with smartphones for functional, work-related, or entertainment purposes. However, this finding contrasts with other studies, such as those of Andrews et al. (2015), which found that women tend to use smartphones more frequently, particularly for social communication and maintaining relationships. These discrepancies could be attributed to various factors, including temporal differences in when the studies were conducted, cultural or societal norms related to technology use, and demographic differences in the study populations. ...
Article
Full-text available
Excessive smartphone use Problematic smartphone use Higher smartphone use A B S T R A C T Smartphones have become indispensable in modern society, serving both everyday life and professional work. While they offer numerous advantages, their excessive use may cause adverse effects. Using a Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) framework, this descriptive cross-sectional study in Australia presents a comparative analysis of individual smartphone usage in relation to that of friends and family, alongside an examination of self-reported experiences of dependency related to smartphone use. A sample of 523 adults completed a self-report questionnaire assessing their smartphone usage, smartphone dependency, and the activities they frequently performed on their smartphones. The bivariate analysis conducted in this study revealed significant associations between self-reported smartphone use and various socio-demographic factors, including age, gender, parental status, and occupational status. Specifically, individuals aged 18-40, males, non-parents, and students reported higher levels of smartphone use compared to their respective counterparts. Regarding the most frequently performed smartphone activities, males and employed participants reported spending the majority of their time using social media and engaging in audio and video activities. The findings of this study also indicate that a significant portion of participants perceive their smartphone use as higher than that of their peers, reflecting a perceived compulsion to remain continuously connected and engaged. These findings show the influence of socio-demographic factors in understanding smartphone-related behaviours and highlight the need for targeted interventions and strategies addressing excessive smartphone use and dependency.
... Today, it is essential (Ward et al., 2017). Smartphone owners interact with their phones an average of 85 times a day, including as soon as they wake up, just before they go to sleep, and even in the middle of the night (Perlow, 2012;Andrews et al., 2015). Ninety-one percent report 4 of 18 never leaving home without their phones, and forty-six percent say they could not live without them (Deutsche Telekom, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
In the digital age, mobile phones significantly impact human cognition and behavior. This experimental study examined the effects of passive mobile phone presence on attentional control in young adults aged 18–25. Participants were randomly assigned to a control (no phone) or an experimental group (phone present). Attention control was measured using the Attention Network Test (ANT). In contrast, smartphone nomophobia and addiction were measured with the Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q) and the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV). Contrary to previous literature, the presence of a mobile phone did not significantly distract participants or impair attentional performance. No significant relationship emerged between self-reported levels of distraction or nomophobia and actual attentional performance, although smartphone addiction seemed to have a weak effect on the errors made by those who performed in the presence of their mobile phone. Significant gender differences were found in terms of nomophobia, with women reporting higher levels than men. This study suggests that the relationship between mobile phone presence and attentional processes is more complex than previously hypothesized, bringing the existing literature under further consideration.
Preprint
Full-text available
This study employs Difference-in-Differences models to evaluate the impact of early social media use - experienced through a personal smartphone - on academic performance among children aged 7 to 16. A unique dataset comprising 5,227 students from northern Italy was constructed by merging data from a specially designed questionnaire on lifetime digital media habits with longitudinal standardized test scores in Italian, English and mathematics. Participants who created a personal social media account in 6th, 7th, or 8th grade were separately matched with late adopters who initiated their first social media account in the 9th grade or later. The findings provide compelling evidence that early engagement with social media adversely affects learning outcomes. Additional evidence of the effects of early social media use on other academic outcomes for which we lack a longitudinal component (school marks, grade repetitions, track enrolment and self-efficacy) is in line with our main findings. We also find supporting evidence that a substantial part of this negative effect is mediated by students’ smartphone pervasiveness in key moments of the day. These results hold significant implications for educators, policymakers and parents, and for the ongoing debate on children's exposure to social media and its consequences for their well-functioning.
Article
Purpose This study rigorously explores how social media functions as a supportive mental health resource and a potential risk factor, focusing on diverse and marginalized populations. Drawing on three theoretical frameworks – the technology acceptance model (TAM), self-determination theory (SDT) and social influence theory – the research examines how algorithmic biases, platform features and cultural norms intersect to shape anxiety, depression and self-esteem. Through this lens, this study aims to inform evidence-based strategies that address digital literacy, foster ethical artificial intelligence (AI) implementation and accommodate global cultural nuances. Ultimately, the goal is to promote healthier online ecosystems that balance social media’s benefits with necessary safeguards. Design/methodology/approach Based on a mixed-methods approach, the study combined quantitative and qualitative data. A survey of 500 participants (aged 18–30) used standardized instruments (GAD-7, PHQ-9 and Rosenberg Self-Esteem) to measure anxiety, depression and self-esteem, with hierarchical regression revealing key correlations. Concurrently, 50 semi-structured interviews were purposively sampled for demographic diversity, and probed experiences of social comparison, emotional validation and algorithmic influences. The thematic analysis of transcripts and quantitative findings enabled methodological triangulation, enhancing robustness and interpretive depth. This design follows Creswell’s mixed-methods guidelines, providing statistically significant trends and richly contextualized insights into how social media engagement affects mental health across various populations. Findings Quantitative results showed that individuals who spent more than three daily hours on social media were significantly more likely to report anxiety and depression, with social comparison explaining 65% of the variance in self-esteem scores. Women, LGBTQ+ users and those from low-income regions faced compounded mental health risks because of intensified algorithmic biases. Qualitative interviews underscored themes of idealized self-presentation, privacy concerns and cultural pressures linked to body image and identity. Nonetheless, many participants also described social media as a vital source of community support. These findings highlight social media’s complex, bidirectional influence on mental well-being. Research limitations/implications Although the mixed-methods design strengthened the study’s validity through triangulation, certain limitations remain. The reliance on self-reported measures introduces potential response biases, including social desirability and recall inaccuracies. In addition, as the survey was conducted online, the sample may not fully represent individuals with limited digital access, which could exclude some at-risk or marginalized populations. The cross-sectional nature of the research also limits causal interpretation, as it captures a snapshot in time rather than longitudinal trends. Future research should incorporate longitudinal or experimental designs, and expand the sample to include older adults, neurodivergent individuals and participants from underrepresented regions. Nevertheless, the study offers evidence-based implications for designing targeted digital literacy programs, improving algorithmic transparency and enhancing psychosocial support features on social media platforms. Practical implications The findings support implementing culturally contextualized digital literacy programmes to help users recognize algorithmic manipulation, manage social comparison and mitigate cyberbullying. Educational curricula could integrate mental health awareness, equipping students with coping strategies and media literacy skills. Regulatory bodies and technology firms should collaborate to refine AI policies, minimizing biases that disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Platforms can promote a healthier online environment by fostering transparent design principles and user-friendly mental health resources. Governments, NGOs and tech companies could invest in initiatives – such as self-help apps and moderated support communities – empowering individuals to engage with social media more constructively. Social implications Addressing social media’s dual impact can substantially reduce mental health disparities and enhance societal cohesion. By acknowledging cultural norms and intersectional vulnerabilities, interventions can promote inclusivity, ensuring that women, LGBTQ+ communities and low-income users receive tailored support. Community-led campaigns may bolster resilience by normalizing open discussions on mental health, thereby weakening stigma and encouraging help-seeking. In addition, transparent algorithms and equitable moderation can restore user trust. Strengthening digital citizenship fosters empathy and responsible engagement, cultivating environments where diverse identities can thrive. A collective commitment to ethical design and inclusive policy can reshape online spaces into supportive communal resources. Originality/value This study distinguishes itself by integrating TAM, SDT and social influence theory to holistically evaluate social media’s mental health implications across multiple cultural and demographic contexts. By pairing quantitative measures of anxiety, depression and self-esteem with thematic insights into users’ lived experiences, it transcends one-dimensional analyses. The unique emphasis on marginalized groups – affected by both algorithmic biases and cultural pressures – underscores the necessity of intersectional, ethical approaches. Consequently, this research offers a robust framework for policymakers, educators and platform developers seeking to balance innovation with user well-being, setting a benchmark for future global studies on digital platforms and mental health.
Article
Full-text available
The goal of the present study was to investigate the trajectories of problematic smartphone use among adolescents and its predictors, including self‐regulation, fear of missing out (FoMO), depression, and anxiety among Canadian adolescents. A total of 2549 participants (1025 girls; Mage = 14.10 years, SD = 0.96 years) from grades 8 to 12 in Southern British Columbia, Canada, took part in the study. Self‐reported problematic smartphone use was collected annually over 4 years. At Time 1, adolescents provided self‐reports on self‐regulation, depression, anxiety, and FoMO. Growth mixture modelling was used to examine the trajectories of problematic smartphone use. The results revealed three distinct trajectories: low‐increasing‐decreasing (35.5%), moderate‐increasing (60.9%), and high‐stable (3.6%). Multinomial logistic regression revealed that higher FoMO and depression were significant predictors of membership in the high‐stable problematic smartphone use group, while better self‐regulation predicted lower problematic smartphone use. These findings highlight the dynamic nature of problematic smartphone use and the importance of self‐regulation and mental health in understanding problematic smartphone use trajectories among Canadian adolescents.
Article
Full-text available
Keeping social appointments involves keeping track of what day it is. In practice, mismatches between apparent day and actual day are common. For example, a person might think the current day is Wednesday when in fact it is Thursday. Here we show that such mismatches are highly systematic, and can be traced to specific properties of their mental representations. In Study 1, mismatches between apparent day and actual day occurred more frequently on midweek days (Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday) than on other days, and were mainly due to intrusions from immediately neighboring days. In Study 2, reaction times to report the current day were fastest on Monday and Friday, and slowest midweek. In Study 3, participants generated fewer semantic associations for "Tuesday", "Wednesday" and "Thursday" than for other weekday names. Similarly, Google searches found fewer occurrences of midweek days in webpages and books. Analysis of affective norms revealed that participants' associations were strongly negative for Monday, strongly positive for Friday, and graded over the intervening days. Midweek days are confusable because their mental representations are sparse and similar. Mondays and Fridays are less confusable because their mental representations are rich and distinctive, forming two extremes along a continuum of change.
Article
Full-text available
Despite the fact that the mobile phone has become a pervasive technology of our time, little research has been done on mobile dependency. Therefore, a valid and reliable instrument, conforming to Iranian culture seems essential. The aim of our study was to validate the Iranian version of MPPUS (Mobile Phone Problematic Use Scale). This was a cross-sectional research, in which data were collected from 600 students studying at Tehran universities. Stratified sampling method was used to collect data. All participants completed Demographic Questionnaire, Cellular Phone Dependency Questionnaire (CPDQ) anonymously. Finally, a clinical interview (based on DSM-IV-TR) was conducted with 100 participants. Data were analyzed using concurrent validity, factor analysis, internal consistency (Cronbach's'α), split half, test-retest and ROC Curve by SPSS18 Software. As a result of reliability analysis and factor analysis by principal component and Varimax rotation, we extracted three factors including preoccupation, withdrawal symptoms and overuse of mobile phones in both males and females. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the MPPUS was .91; Cronbach's alpha of the factors was .87, .70, .82 respectively. The test-retest correlation of the MPPUS was .56. The best cut off point for this questionnaire (MPPUS) was 160. The MPPUS proved to be a reliable questionnaire with adequate factor models to assess the extent of problems caused by the "misuse" of mobile phones in the Iranian society; however, further studies are needed on this topic.
Article
Full-text available
It was aimed to evaluate the problematic use of mobile phones and quality of sleep among high school students. This is a cross-sectional study carried out on 1,131 high school students studying at Sivrihisar, a district of Eskisehir, in December 2012. The questionnaire form include the sociodemographic characteristics, problematic use of mobile phones and quality of sleep. Bianchi-Phillips problematic use of mobile phones (PUMP) scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used. Median score of PUMP was higher in students using cigarette, using headphones, having a lover and changing the mobile phone frequently (p<0.05 for each). Quality of sleep was found to decline with increasing median scores on PUMP scale.Results of the present study suggest that problematic use of mobile phones declines the quality of life among high school students from Sivrihisar. Adolescents and their family should be informed about use of mobile phones.
Article
Full-text available
Our purpose in this web-based study was to relate smartphone and nonsmartphone use to symptoms of mobile phone dependency, and to examine sociability in this context. We used a stratified sampling method to recruit 551 Singaporean undergraduates. The results showed that young smartphone users tended to have greater mobile phone dependency and more severe symptoms than nonsmartphone users did. We found that utilizing mobile Internet and text messaging were both positively associated with smartphone users' dependency. Regardless of phone type used, the level of sociability of mobile phone users was positively associated with mobile dependency and symptoms of feeling anxious and lost, and withdrawal/escape.
Article
Full-text available
We describe the current use and future promise of an innovative methodology, ambulatory assessment (AA), that can be used to investigate psychological, emotional, behavioral, and biological processes of individuals in their daily life. The term AA encompasses a wide range of methods used to study people in their natural environment, including momentary self-report, observational, and physiological. We emphasize applications of AA that integrate two or more of these methods, discuss the smart phone as a hub or access point for AA, and discuss future applications of AA methodology to the science of psychology. We pay particular attention to the development and application of Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) that can be implemented with smart phones and wireless physiological monitoring devices, and we close by discussing future applications of this approach to matters relevant to psychological science.
Article
Full-text available
This study uniquely examined the impacts on self, cognition, anxiety, and physiology when iPhone users are unable to answer their iPhone while performing cognitive tasks. A 2 x 2 within-subjects experiment was conducted. Participants (N = 40 iPhone users) completed two word search puzzles. Among the key findings from this study were that when iPhone users were unable to answer their ringing iPhone during a word search puzzle, heart rate and blood pressure increased, self-reported feelings of anxiety and unpleasantness increased, and self-reported extended self and cognition decreased. These findings suggest that negative psychological and physiological outcomes are associated with iPhone separation and the inability to answer one’s ringing iPhone during cognitive tasks. Implications of findings are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Proper sleep length and quality are essential for physical and mental health and have found to be related to a variety of negative outcomes (Brown, Buboltz, &Soper, 2002). College is a time,a transition for individuals where they begin laying a foundation for their future and acquiring sufficient sleep is of great value. College students are recognized as one of the most sleep-deprived groups, but also, as one of the most technologically-oriented population. Due to this combination, college students' sleep habits and mobile phone use habits havebegun to receiveattention. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between sleep quality/length and mobile phone use among college students. Three hundred and fifty college students voluntarily participated by completing the Sleep Quality Index (SQI), The Sleep Habits Survey,the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale(MPPUS), the SMS Problem Use Scale (SMS-PUDQ) and the Mini IPIP. Results indicate that various aspects of mobile phone use such as problem mobile phone use, addictive text messaging, problematic texting, and pathological texting are related to sleep quality, but not sleep length. Additionally, extraverted individuals were found to engage in greater mobile phone use and problematic text messaging.
Article
Full-text available
Despite its unambiguous advantages, cellular phone use has been associated with harmful or potentially disturbing behaviors. Problematic use of the mobile phone is considered as an inability to regulate one’s use of the mobile phone, which eventually involves negative consequences in daily life (e.g., financial problems). The current article describes what can be considered dysfunctional use of the mobile phone and emphasizes its multifactorial nature. Validated assessment instruments to measure problematic use of the mobile phone are described. The available literature on risk factors for dysfunctional mobile phone use is then reviewed, and a pathways model that integrates the existing literature is proposed. Finally, the assumption is made that dysfunctional use of the mobile phone is part of a spectrum of cyber addictions that encompasses a variety of dysfunctional behaviors and implies involvement in specific online activities (e.g., video games, gambling, social networks, sex-related websites).
Article
A questionnaire-based study aimed to explore the link between Internet addiction, problematic mobile phone use and the occurrence of cognitive failures in daily life. Previous research has suggested that individuals who have lower working memory capacity (WMC) and poorer attentional control (AC) maybe poorer at limiting the distraction effect posed by access to communicative digital media such as the Internet and mobile phones (Unsworth, McMillan, Brewer, & Spillers, 2012). 210 participants completed an online questionnaire which comprised of the Online Cognition Scale (OCS; Davis, Flett, & Besser, 2002), the Problematic Mobile Phone Use Scale (MPPUS; Bianchi & Phillips, 2005) and the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent, Cooper, FitzGerald, & Parkes, 1982). Both the OCS and MPPUS were significantly positively correlated to scores on the CFQ. Further analysis revealed a significant difference between high and low scoring groups for both the MPPUS and the OCS and scores on the CFQ, with those in the higher groups presenting greater self reported cognitive failures. The results are interpreted as being symptomatic of individuals in the higher OCS and MPPUS groups as being less resilient to the distractions posed by digital media and technology with a suggested link to lower WMC and AC.