ArticlePDF Available

Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research

  • My Dissertation Coach


Failure to reach data saturation has an impact on the quality of the research conducted and hampers content validity. The aim of a study should include what determines when data saturation is achieved, for a small study will reach saturation more rapidly than a larger study. Data saturation is reached when there is enough information to replicate the study when the ability to obtain additional new information has been attained, and when further coding is no longer feasible. The following article critiques two qualitative studies for data saturation: Wolcott (2004) and Landau and Drori (2008). Failure to reach data saturation has a negative impact on the validity on one’s research. The intended audience is novice student researchers. © 2015: Patricia I. Fusch, Lawrence R. Ness, and Nova Southeastern University.
The Qualitative Report 2015 Volume 20, Number 9, How To Article 1, 1408-1416
Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research
Patricia I. Fusch and Lawrence R. Ness
Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Failure to reach data saturation has an impact on the quality of the research
conducted and hampers content validity. The aim of a study should include
what determines when data saturation is achieved, for a small study will reach
saturation more rapidly than a larger study. Data saturation is reached when
there is enough information to replicate the study when the ability to obtain
additional new information has been attained, and when further coding is no
longer feasible. The following article critiques two qualitative studies for data
saturation: Wolcott (2004) and Landau and Drori (2008). Failure to reach
data saturation has a negative impact on the validity on one’s research. The
intended audience is novice student researchers. Keywords: Data Saturation,
Triangulation, Interviews, Personal Lens, Bias.
Failure to reach data saturation has an impact on the quality of the research conducted
and hampers content validity (Bowen, 2008; Kerr, Nixon, & Wild, 2010). Students who
design a qualitative research study come up against the dilemma of data saturation when
interviewing study participants (O’Reilly & Parker, 2012; Walker, 2012). In particular,
students must address the question of how many interviews are enough to reach data
saturation (Guest, Bunce, & Johnson, 2006). A frequent reference for answering this
question is Mason (2010), who presented an extensive discussion of data saturation in
qualitative research. However, the paper’s references are somewhat dated for doctoral
students today, ranging in dates from 1981-2005 and consisting mainly of textbooks.
Although the publication date of the article is 2010, this is one of those types of articles that
have older data masquerading as newer. The Mason (2010) article was recently updated to
reflect a more contemporary date; however, the article did not update the content other than a
few more recent citations. That is not to say that the article has no merit; instead, the
concepts behind data saturation remain universal and timeless. Mason has a talent for
explaining the difficult in terms that most can understand. Moreover, many students use
Mason’s work as support for their proposals and studies. To be sure, the concept of data
saturation is not new and it is a universal one, as well. What is of concern is that Mason
supported his assertions with textbooks and dated sources.
When deciding on a study design, the student should aim for one that is explicit
regarding how data saturation is reached. Data saturation is reached when there is enough
information to replicate the study (O’Reilly & Parker, 2012; Walker, 2012), when the ability
to obtain additional new information has been attained (Guest et al., 2006), and when further
coding is no longer feasible (Guest et al., 2006).
One Size Does Not Fit All
The field of data saturation is a neglected one. The reason for this is because it is a
concept that is hard to define. This is especially problematic because of the many hundreds if
not thousands of research designs out there (Marshall & Rossman, 2011). What is data
saturation for one is not nearly enough for another. Case in point: ethnography is known for a
great deal of data saturation because of the lengthy timelines to complete a study as well as
the multitude of data collection methods used. In contrast, meta-analysis can be problematic
1409 The Qualitative Report 2015
because the researcher is using already established databases for the information; therefore,
the researcher is dependent upon prior researchers reaching data saturation. In the case of a
phenomenological study design, the point at which data saturation has been attained is
different than if one were using a case study design. To be sure, the use of probing questions
and creating a state of epoché in a phenomenological study design will assist the researcher in
the quest for data saturation; however, a case study design parameters are more explicit
(Amerson, 2011; Bucic, Robinson, & Ramburuth, 2010).
There is no one-size-fits-all method to reach data saturation. This is because study
designs are not universal. However, researchers do agree on some general principles and
concepts: no new data, no new themes, no new coding, and ability to replicate the study
(Guest et al., 2006). When and how one reaches those levels of saturation will vary from
study design to study design. The idea of data saturation in studies is helpful; however, it
does not provide any pragmatic guidelines for when data saturation has been reached (Guest
et al., 2006). Guest et al noted that data saturation may be attained by as little as six
interviews depending on the sample size of the population. However, it may be best to think
of data in terms of rich and thick (Dibley, 2011) rather than the size of the sample
(Burmeister, & Aitken, 2012). The easiest way to differentiate between rich and thick data is
to think of rich as quality and thick as quantity. Thick data is a lot of data; rich data is many-
layered, intricate, detailed, nuanced, and more. One can have a lot of thick data that is not
rich; conversely, one can have rich data but not a lot of it. The trick, if you will, is to have
both. One cannot assume data saturation has been reached just because one has exhausted
the resources. Again, data saturation is not about the numbers per se, but about the depth of
the data (Burmeister & Aitken, 2012). For example, one should choose the sample size that
has the best opportunity for the researcher to reach data saturation. A large sample size does
not guarantee one will reach data saturation, nor does a small sample sizerather, it is what
constitutes the sample size (Burmeister & Aitken, 2012). What some do not recognize is that
no new themes go hand-in-hand with no new data and no new coding (O’Reilly & Parker,
2012). If one has reached the point of no new data, one has also most likely reached the point
of no new themes; therefore, one has reached data saturation. Morse, Lowery, and Steury
(2014) made the point that the concept of data saturation has many meaning to many
researchers; moreover, it is inconsistently assessed and reported. What is interesting about
their study results is that the authors noted that in their review of 560 dissertations that
sample size was rarely if ever chosen for data saturation reasons. Instead, the sample size was
chosen for other reasons (Morse et al., 2014).
Data Collection Methods to Reach Saturation
During the study, a novice researcher can conduct the research in a manner to attain
data saturation (Francis et al., 2010; Gerring, 2011; Gibbert & Ruigrok, 2010; Onwuegbuzie,
Leech, & Collins, 2010) by collecting rich (quality) and thick (quantity) data (Dibley, 2011),
although an appropriate study design should also be considered. One could choose a data
collection methodology that has been used before (Porte, 2013) that demonstrated data
saturation had been reached; moreover, one would correctly document the process as
evidence (Kerr et al., 2010).
Interviews are one method by which one’s study results reach data saturation. Bernard
(2012) stated that the number of interviews needed for a qualitative study to reach data
saturation was a number he could not quantify, but that the researcher takes what he can get.
Moreover, interview questions should be structured to facilitate asking multiple participants
the same questions, otherwise one would not be able to achieve data saturation as it would be
Patricia I. Fusch and Lawrence R. Ness 1410
a constantly moving target (Guest et al., 2006). To further enhance data saturation, Bernard
(2012) recommended including the interviewing of people that one would not normally
consider. He cautioned against the shaman effect, in that someone with specialized
information on a topic can overshadow the data, whether intentionally or inadvertently
(Bernard, 2012). Finally, care should be taken when confronting gatekeepers at the research
site who may restrict access to key informants (Holloway, Brown, & Shipway, 2010) which
would hamper complete data collection and data saturation.
Another example of data collection methods would be a focus group session. A focus
group interview is a flexible, unstructured dialogue between the members of a group and an
experienced facilitator/moderator that meets in a convenient location (Brockman et al., 2010;
Jayawardana & O’Donnell, 2009; Packer-Muti, 2010). The focus group interview is a way to
elicit multiple perspectives on a given topic but may not be as effective for sensitive areas
(Nepomuceno & Porto, 2010). This method drives research through openness, which is about
receiving multiple perspectives about the meaning of truth in situations where the observer
cannot be separated from the phenomenon (Natasia & Rakow, 2010). This concept is found
in interpretive theory wherein the researcher operates thorough a belief in the multiplicity of
peoples, cultures, and means of knowing and understanding (Natasia & Rakow, 2010).
For focus groups it is recommended that the size of the group include between six and
12 participants, so that the group is small enough for all members to talk and share their
thoughts, and yet large enough to create a diverse group (Lasch et al., 2010; Onwuegbuzie et
al., 2010). Focus groups have limitations pertaining to a propensity for groupthink in that
members pressure others to conform to group consensus (Dimitroff, Schmidt, & Bond, 2005).
Furthermore, a focus group session that elicits useful information can be dependent on the
skills of the facilitator as well as the failure to monitor subgroups with the focus group
(Onwuegbuzie et al., 2010). Therefore, a focus group is one way to elicit a number of
perspectives on a given topic to reach data saturation if one had a large pool of potential
participants to draw from. This would be appropriate if one were already conducting
individual interviews with a small number of participants and one would like to get a group
perspective about the phenomenon. For example, after interviewing five senior executive
level leaders individually, one could interview 5-8 more senior executive level leaders as a
group. To be sure, there are individual perspectives that should be explored as well as a
group perspective that could also be relevant. It is a good strategy to use to gather a great deal
of data in a short amount of time.
Other methods to ensure that data saturation has been achieved include having the
researcher construct a saturation grid, wherein major topics are listed on the vertical and
interviews to be conducted are listed on the horizontal (Brod, Tesler, & Christiansen, 2009).
Further recommendations include the possibility of having a second party conduct coding of
transcripts to ensure data saturation has been reached (Brod et al., 2009). Additionally, the
researcher should avoid including a one-time phenomenon that elicits the dominant mood of
one participant (Onwuegbuzie, Leech, Slate, Stark, & Sharma, 2012) that could hamper the
validity and transferability of the study results. At the end of the study, if new information is
obtained in the final analysis, then further interviews should be conducted as needed until
saturation is reached (Brod et al., 2009; Rubin & Rubin, 2012).
The Researcher’s Personal Lens and Data Saturation
The role of the researcher is an important part of a study. One of the challenges in
addressing data saturation is about the use of a personal lens primarily because novice
researchers (such as students) assume that they have no bias in their data collection and may
not recognize when the data is indeed saturated. However, it is important to remember that a
1411 The Qualitative Report 2015
participant’s as well as the researcher’s bias/worldview is present in all social research, both
intentionally and unintentionally (Fields & Kafai, 2009). To address the concept of a
personal lens, in qualitative research, the researcher is the data collection instrument and
cannot separate themselves from the research (Jackson, 1990) which brings up special
concerns. To be clear here, the researcher operates between multiple worlds while engaging
in research, which includes the cultural world of the study participants as well as the world of
one’s own perspective (Denzin, 2009). Hence, it becomes imperative that the interpretation of
the phenomena represent that of participants and not of the researcher (Holloway et al., 2010) in
order for the data to be saturated. Hearing and understanding the perspective of others may be
one of the most difficult dilemmas that face the researcher. The better a researcher is able to
recognize his/her personal view of the world and to discern the presence of a personal lens,
the better one is able to hear and interpret the behavior and reflections of others (Dibley,
2011; Fields & Kafai, 2009) and represent them in the data that is collected. How one
addresses and mitigates a personal lens/worldview during data collection and analysis is a
key component for the study. It is important that a novice researcher recognizes their own
personal role in the study and mitigates any concerns during data collection (Chenail, 2011).
Part of the discussion should address how this is demonstrated through understanding when
the data is saturated by mitigating the use of one’s personal lens during the data collection
process of the study (Dibley, 2011). Hence, a researcher's cultural and experiential background
will contain biases, values, and ideologies (Chenail, 2011) that can affect when the data is
indeed saturated (Bernard, 2012).
The Relationship Between Data Triangulation and Data Saturation
To reiterate, data saturation can be attained in a number of methods; however, a
researcher should keep in mind the importance of data triangulation (Denzin, 2009, 2012).
To be sure, the application of triangulation (multiple sources of data) will go a long way
towards enhancing the reliability of results (Stavros & Westberg, 2009) and the attainment of
data saturation. Denzin (2009) noted that triangulation involves the employment of multiple
external methods to collect data as well as the analysis of the data. To enhance objectivity,
truth, and validity, Denzin (2009) categorized four types of triangulation for social research.
Denzin (2009) suggested data triangulation for correlating people, time, and space;
investigator triangulation for correlating the findings from multiple researchers in a study;
theory triangulation for using and correlating multiple theoretical strategies; and
methodological triangulation for correlating data from multiple data collection methods.
Multiple external analysis methods concerning the same events and the validity of the process
may be enhanced by multiple sources of data (Fusch, 2008, 2013; Holloway et al., 2010).
There is a direct link between data triangulation and data saturation; the one (data
triangulation) ensures the other (data saturation). In other words, data triangulation is a
method to get to data saturation. Denzin (2009) argued that no single method, theory, or
observer can capture all that is relevant or important. Denzin (2006), however, did state that
triangulation is the method in which the researcher “must learn to employ multiple external
methods in the analysis of the same empirical events" (p. 13). Moreover, triangulation is the
way in which one explores different levels and perspectives of the same phenomenon. It is
one method by which the validity of the study results are ensured. Novice researchers in
particular should keep in mind that the triangulation of data can result in sometimes
contradictory and inconsistent results; however, it is up to the researcher to make sense of
them for the reader and to demonstrate the richness of the information gleaned from the data
(O’Reilly & Parker, 2012). Saturation is important in any study, whether quantitative,
qualitative, or mixed methods. Methodological triangulation goes a long ways towards
Patricia I. Fusch and Lawrence R. Ness 1412
ensuring this (Bekhet & Zauszniewski, 2012) through multiple data sources. Methodological
triangulation ensures that that data is rich in depth. Denzin (2012) made the point that it is
somewhat like looking through a crystal to perceive all the facets/viewpoints of the data.
Moreover, he posited that triangulation should be reframed as crystal refraction (many points
of light) to extrapolate the meaning inherent in the data. This is especially important in
ethnographic research where one is expected to have multiple data collection techniques to
find the meaning that participants use to frame their world (Forsey, 2010). One does not
necessarily triangulate; one crystallizes thorough recognizing that there are many sides from
which to approach a concept (Richardson & Adams St. Pierre, 2008), although this
distinction may be merely the same concept with a different label.
Two Examples
Rich and thick data results may not represent data saturation, particularly when it
comes to a type of study known as an auto-ethnography (Wolcott, 2004). Auto-ethnography
was coined by David Hayano (1979) to describe a study where the researcher was an insider
member of the group being studied; in his case it was a group of people he was acquainted
with who gathered to play cards (Wolcott, 2004). This is in contrast to the traditional role
played by anthropologists where they are on the outskirts of a group, as “a peripheral
participant” (Wolcott, 2004, p. 98). Renowned anthropologist H. F. Wolcott wrote about the
confusion between the terms auto-ethnography and ethnographic autobiography (Wolcott,
2004). Wolcott used his seminal study of a sneaky kid, a seminal work in auto-ethnographic
studies, to illustrate how the term auto-ethnography morphed from a meaning about the
researcher as a part of a studied group to a term illustrating a personal history as biography
(Wolcott, 2004). The term auto-ethnography in the classic sense came to describe the
“narratives of the self” (Wolcott, 2004, p. 99), as opposed to more contemporary definitions
such as evocative autoethnography which offers one an opportunity to reflect on personal
experience or analytic autoethnography which uses personal data to address a broader social
phenomenon (Anderson, 2006). Therefore, as Wolcott stated, an ethnographic autobiography
is “a life story told to an anthropologist” (Wolcott, 2004, p. 93). One can see the apparent
data saturation issues present in this type of study, regardless of the detail, as the data is
limited to self-reported data presented by the subject. In particular, upon review of Wolcott’s
study of the sneaky kid, one notes the absence of collaborating data about the life history of
the subject, including court records or data provided by third parties associated with the
subject. While the authors of this article harbor great respect for Wolcott and his seminal
work in ethnography, they are also somewhat uncomfortable with this type of research due to
the lack of methodological triangulation.
In contrast to Wolcott’s study of the sneaky kid, Landau and Drori’s (2008)
qualitative study included data triangulation as evidenced by multiple sources of data and
analysis. Their research centered on an R & D laboratory in Israel that had recently
experienced a change in direction from science-based research to profit-making production
(Landau & Drori, 2008). The researchers conducted a three-year ethnographic field study
using participant observation, induction, interpretation, close proximity and unmediated
relationships (Landau & Drori, 2008). They conducted their work between 1996 and 1999
and based it on an inductive grounded theory case study analysis that used both specific and
general questions asked of participants to determine viewpoints, and included a cross section
of the organization’s employees including scientists and managers (Landau & Drori, 2008).
They found that confrontational sense-making resulted from the conflict between scientists
and mangers’ efforts to construct a new organization culture from the old of pure science to
the new of profitability (Landau & Drori, 2008). The viewpoints were perceived as mutually
1413 The Qualitative Report 2015
exclusive at the beginning of the process, until management allowed “both to save face by
promoting sense-making accounts sufficiently blurred to enable each side to admit its own
cultural rationale” (Landau & Drori, 2008, p. 713) for the lab’s existence. Mixed sense-
making tolerates the side-by-side existence of both past and present into a cultural pool that
allows an organization to move forward when choosing strategies to address change (Landau
& Drori, 2008).
Are We There Yet?
In C.S. Forester’s book Beat to Quarters, the author describes the leadership abilities
of his hero, as …“like a calculating machine, judging wind and sea, time and distance…” (p.
160), as an illustration of how Horatio Hornblower was able to so effectively wage his
English sea war against the Napoleonic juggernaut in the early 1800s. So, too, must
qualitative researchers account for multiple sources of data and perspectives to insure that
their study results demonstrate validity through data saturation, so that they too may hear of
their research…“I am both astonished and pleased at the work you have accomplished” (p.
167). It can be said that failure to reach data saturation has a negative impact on the validity
on one’s study results (Kerr et al., 2010; Roe & Just, 2009); however, there is no one-size-
fits-all method to reach data saturation; moreover, more is not necessarily better than less and
vice versa. There are, rather, data collection methods that are more likely to reach data
saturation than others, although these methods are highly dependent on the study design. To
be sure, the concept of data saturation may be easy to understand; the execution is another
matter entirely (Guest et al., 2006). When deciding on a study design, the student should aim
for one that is explicit regarding how data saturation is reached. Data saturation is reached
when there is enough information to replicate the study (O’Reilly & Parker, 2012; Walker,
2012), when the ability to obtain additional new information has been attained (Guest et al.,
2006), and when further coding is no longer feasible (Guest et al., 2006). Rich and thick data
descriptions obtained through relevant data collection methods can go a long ways towards
assisting with this process when coupled with an appropriate research study design that has
the best opportunity to answer the research question.
Amerson, R. (2011). Making a case for the case study method. Journal of Nursing Education,
50(8), 427-428. doi: 10.3928.01484834-20110719-01
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,
35(4), 373-395. doi:10.1177/0891241605280449
Bekhet, A. K., & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2012). Methodological triangulation: An approach to
understanding data. Nurse Researcher, 20(2), 40-43. Retrieved from
Bernard, R. H. (2012). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches
(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note.
Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137-152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301
Brockman, J. L., Nunez, A. A., & Basu, A. (2010). Effectiveness of a conflict resolution
training program in changing graduate students style of managing conflict with their
faculty advisors. Innovative Higher Education, 35, 277-293. doi: 10.1007/s10755-
Patricia I. Fusch and Lawrence R. Ness 1414
Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christiansen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content
validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life
Research, 18(9), 1263-1278. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
Bucic, T., Robinson, L., & Ramburuth, P. (2010). Effects of leadership style on team
learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(4), 228-248.
Burmeister, E., & Aitken, L. M. (2012). Sample size: How many is enough? Australian
Critical Care, 25, 271-274. doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2012.07.002
Chenail, R. (2011). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation
and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1),
255-262. Retrieved from
Denzin, N. (2006). Sociological methods: A sourcebook (5th ed.). New York, NY: Aldine
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods.
New York, NY: Aldine Transaction.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88.
Dibley, L. (2011). Analyzing narrative data using McCormack’s lenses. Nurse Researcher,
18(3), 13-19. Retrieved from
Dimitroff, R. D., Schmidt, L. A., & Bond, T. D. (2005). Organizational behavior and disaster:
A study of conflict at NASA. Project Management Journal, 36(2), 28-38. Retrieved
Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2009). A connective ethnography of peer knowledge sharing
and diffusion in a tween virtual world. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning,
4(1), 47-69. doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9057-1
Forester, C. S. (1937). Beat to quarters. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Forsey, M. G. (2010). Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography, 11(4), 558-572.
Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V. Eccles, M. P., &
Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalizing data
saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25, 1229-1245.
Fusch, G. E. (2008). What happens when the ROI model does not fit? Performance
Improvement Quarterly, 14(4), 60-76. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2001.tb00230.x
Fusch, P. I. (2013). Identifying conflict resolution skills sets for production front line
supervisors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses
database. (UMI No. 3575083)
Gerring, J. (2011). How good is enough? A multidimensional, best-possible standard for
research design. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 625-636.
Gibbert, M., & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The what and how of case study rigor: Three strategies
based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 710-737.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An
experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
Holloway, I., Brown, L., & Shipway, R. (2010). Meaning not measurement: Using
ethnography to bring a deeper understanding to the participant experience of festivals
1415 The Qualitative Report 2015
and events. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 1(1), 74-85.
Jackson, J. E. (1990). I am a fieldnote: Fieldnotes as a symbol of professional identity. In R.
Sanjek (Ed.), Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology (pp. 3-33). Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press.
Jayawardana, A., & O’Donnell, M. (2009). Devolution, job enrichment and workplace
performance in Sri Lanka’s garment industry. The Economic and Labour Relations
Review, 19(2), 107-122. Retrieved from
Kerr, C. (2010). Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquire supporting
patient-reported outcomes research. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics &
Outcomes Research, 10(3), 269-281. doi:10.1586/erp.10.30
Landau, D., & Drori, I. (2008). Narratives as sensemaking accounts: The case of an R & D
laboratory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(6), 701-720.
Lasch, K. E., Marquis, P., Vigneux, M., Abetz, L., Arnould, B., & Bayliss, M. (2010). PRO
development: Rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Quality of Life
Research, 19(8), 1087-1096. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2011). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mason, M. (2010,). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews.
Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). Retrieved from
Morse, W. C., Lowery, D. R., & Steury, T. (2014). Exploring saturation of themes and
spatial locations in qualitative public participation geographic information systems
research. Society & Natural Resources, 27(5), 557-571.
Nepomuceno, M., & Porto, J., (2010). Human values and attitudes toward bank services in
Brazil. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(3), 168-192.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2010). Innovative data collection
strategies in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 696-726. Retrieved
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., Slate, J. R., Stark, M., & Sharma, B. (2012). An exemplar
for teaching and learning qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 16-77.
Retrieved from
O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2012, May). Unsatisfactory saturation: A critical exploration of
the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research
Journal, 1-8. doi:10.1177/1468794112446106
Packer-Muti, B. (2010). Conducting a focus group. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 1023-
1026. Retrieved from
Porte, G. (2013). Who needs replication? CALICO Journal, 30, 10-15.
Richardson, L., & Adams St. Pierre, E. (2008). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K.
Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd
ed., pp. 473-500). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Patricia I. Fusch and Lawrence R. Ness 1416
Roe, B. E., & Just, D. R. (2009). Internal and external validity in economics research:
Tradeoffs between experiments, field experiments, natural experiments, and field
data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(5), 1266-1271.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd
ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Stavros, C., & Westberg, K. (2009). Using triangulation and multiple case studies to advance
relationship marketing theory. Qualitative Market Research, 12(3), 307-320.
Walker, J. L. (2012). The use of saturation in qualitative research. Canadian Journal of
Cardiovascular Nursing, 22(2), 37-46. Retrieved from
Wolcott, H. F. (2004). The ethnographic autobiography. Auto/Biography, 12, 93-106.
Author Note
Dr. Patricia Fusch is contributing faculty at Walden University. Her research focuses
on leadership, manufacturing, women in business; ethnographic design, case study design,
change management initiatives, focus group facilitation, and organizational development. Dr.
Fusch has experience as a performance improvement consultant in the public and private
sector. Her publications can be found in The Qualitative Report and in The International
Journal of Applied Management and Technology. She can be reached at
Dr. Lawrence R. Ness is Adjunct Faculty of IT Management, Business
Administration, and Doctoral Research. His research focuses on information technology
management strategies towards increased effectiveness and business alignment. Dr. Ness has
extensive corporate experience in the area of information technology management and has
successfully chaired over 70 doctoral dissertation graduates. Dr. Ness is Founder of
Dissertation101 Mentoring Services, LLC and can be reached at
Copyright 2015: Patricia I. Fusch, Lawrence R. Ness, and Nova Southeastern
Article Citation
Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research.
The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408-1416. Retrieved from
... Sample size was guided by data saturation, meaning recruitment stopped once interviewing more participants did not provide additional insights regarding the study's main objectives. In other words, recruitment ended once participants' stories, which included different details, all began to allude to the same themes [30,31]. ...
... Data saturation was reached at about 15 participants in each group, but five more participants per group were recruited. A total of forty participants (20 [50%] 30 [75%] with at least a high school diploma) completed interviews and short questionnaires. Eighteen participants in the home dialysis group were undergoing PD, and the other two were undergoing home hemodialysis. ...
Full-text available
Background Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) may choose to undergo dialysis in-center or at home, but uptake of home dialysis in the US has been minimal despite its benefits over in-center dialysis. Factors that may have led patients to select home dialysis over in-center dialysis are poorly understood in the literature, and interventions to improve selection of home dialysis have focused on patient knowledge and shared decision-making processes between patients and providers. The purpose of this study was to explore micro- and macro-level factors surrounding dialysis modality decision-making among patients undergoing in-center and home dialysis, and explore what leads patients to select home dialysis over in-center dialysis. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in a dialysis clinic at a large Midwestern research hospital, from September 2019 to December 2020. Participants were 18 years or older, undergoing dialysis for ESKD, and had the cognitive ability to provide consent. Surveys assessing demographic and clinical information were administered to participants following their interviews. Results Forty patients completed interviews and surveys (20 [50%] in-center dialysis, 17 [43%] female, mean [SD] age, 59 [15.99] years). Qualitative findings suggested that healthcare access and engagement before entering nephrology care, after entering nephrology care, and following dialysis initiation influenced patients’ awareness regarding their kidney disease status, progression toward ESKD, and dialysis options. Potential modifiers of these outcomes include race, ethnicity, and language barriers. Most participants adopted a passive-approach during decision-making. Finally, fatigue, concerns regarding one’s dialyzing schedule, and problems with fistula/catheter access sites contributed to overall satisfaction with one’s dialysis modality. Conclusions Findings point to broader factors affecting dialysis selection, including healthcare access and racial/ethnic inequities. Providing dialysis information before entering nephrology and after dialysis initiation may improve patient agency in decision-making. Additional resources should be prioritized for patients of underrepresented backgrounds. Dialysis decision-making may be appropriately modeled under the social-ecological framework to inform future interventions.
... This sample size was chosen with a goal of reaching saturation. [78][79][80] The goal will be to conduct 4-6 focus groups with 8-12 participants in each. Groups will be heterogeneous, with efforts to include an equal distribution of providers and older adults/ family caregivers in each. ...
Full-text available
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing challenges within the Canadian healthcare system and reinforced the need for long-term care (LTC) reform to prioritise building an integrated continuum of services to meet the needs of older adults. Almost all Canadians want to live, age and receive care at home, yet funding for home and community-based care and support services is limited and integration with primary care and specialised geriatric services is sparse. Optimisation of existing home and community care services would equip the healthcare system to proactively meet the needs of older Canadians and enhance capacity within the hospital and residential care sectors to facilitate access and reduce wait times for those whose needs are best served in these settings. The aim of this study is to design a model of long-term ‘life care’ at home (LTlifeC model) to sustainably meet the needs of a greater number of community-dwelling older adults. Methods and analysis An explanatory sequential mixed methods design will be applied across three phases. In the quantitative phase, secondary data analysis will be applied to historical Ontario Home Care data to develop unique groupings of patient needs according to known predictors of residential LTC home admission, and to define unique patient vignettes using dominant care needs. In the qualitative phase, a modified eDelphi process and focus groups will engage community-based clinicians, older adults and family caregivers in the development of needs-based home care packages. The third phase involves triangulation to determine initial model feasibility. Ethics and dissemination This study has received ethics clearance from the University of Waterloo Research Ethics Board (ORE #42182). Results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and local, national and international conferences. Other forms of knowledge mobilisation will include webinars, policy briefs and lay summaries to elicit support for implementation and pilot testing phases.
... Moreover, to increase the validity of study findings through triangulation and the collection of data from all study participants can use both focus groups and interviews (Carter, 2014, p. 257). Lastly, data saturation was achieved for focus groups and interviews once researchers noted information was repetative (Fusch & Ness, 2015). Whittemore et al. (2001) strategies to improve trustworthiness of data are classified into four primary validity criteria (credibility, authenticity, criticality, and integrity). ...
The capability of US mental health clinicians to confidently use scientific, rigorous information to authenticate their counseling practice is critical to successful mental health provision. In this age of genetics, the provision of substandard, ill-informed mental health professional services through non-evidence-based science has negative clinical implications for patients, families, and the behavioral health field. With exponentially increasing access to genetic testing, the high prevalence of discovering an unknown genetic parentage is a new phenomenon. This study aims to assess in-service and accredited training within NAMI mental health professional disciplines which serve US donor-conceived (DC). DC adults are one specific type of misattributed parentage (MP) population. Misattributed parentage situations include: unknown/undisclosed extramarital affair/tryst, adoption (hidden, orphan, foster care, late discovery adoptees), assisted conception (DC, sperm donation, egg donation, embryo donation, surrogacy, dna clinic mix-up etc.), rape or assault, or another event. The study’s findings included the lack of DC/MP curricula, clinical advocacy benefits, and clinicians’ need to understand genetics. Also, the study found future participatory research must include DC-related stakeholders (DC, donors, social/biological nuclear family, fertility industry, DNA testing companies, etc.). Clinicians called for cross-discipline communities of practice, the need for federal DC reporting, and research on modalities to treat specific DC-trauma/identity issues (eg. excessive numbers of siblings, specific legal/ethical issues, wide denial of known relationships, etc.). Most notably, clinicians agreed on the need to educate themselves via revamped association in-service and accredited academic training using donor-conceived-client-centered approaches and industry-standard behavioral health practices to improve donor-conceived peoples' health and mental well-being.
... We purposively recruited a maximum variation sample of care home staff members, interviewing nurses and care assistants who were diverse in terms of role, age, sex, and ethnicity. We continued until we reached theoretical saturation when any additional interviews did not add new information to the data already collected [26]. ...
Full-text available
Background Sleep disturbances affect 38% of care home residents living with dementia. They are often treated with medication, but non-pharmacological interventions may be safer and effective yet more difficult to implement. In the SIESTA study (Sleep problems In dEmentia: interviews with care home STAff) we explored care home staffs’ experience of managing sleep disturbances in their residents living with dementia. Methods We conducted one-to-one semi-structured interviews in four UK care homes, and purposively recruited a maximum variation sample of 18 nurses and care assistants, who were each interviewed once. We used a topic guide and audio-recorded the interviews. Two researchers independently analysed themes from transcribed interviews. Results Staff used a range of techniques that often worked in improving or preventing residents’ sleep disturbance. During the daytime, staff encouraged residents to eat well, and be physically active and stimulated to limit daytime sleep. In the evening, staff settled residents into dark, quiet, comfortable bedrooms often after a snack. When residents woke at night, they gave them caffeinated tea or food, considered possible pain and discomfort, and reassured residents they were safe. If residents remained unsettled, staff would engage them in activities. They used telecare to monitor night-time risk. Staff found minimising daytime napping difficult, described insufficient staffing at night to attend to reorient and guide awake residents and said residents frequently did not know it was night-time. Conclusions Some common techniques, such as caffeinated drinks, may be counterproductive. Future non-pharmacological interventions should consider practical difficulties staff face in managing sleep disturbances, including struggling to limit daytime napping, identifying residents’ night-time needs, day-night disorientation, and insufficient night-time staffing.
... In addition to the selected cases, additional net-maps were conducted with other households, until a saturation point was reached (Fusch & Ness, 2015). Eight net-maps in total were produced for this purpose. ...
To end hunger and increase food security, substantial investments will be required. In sub-Saharan Africa, smallholder agricultural households have a major role to play. However, finding the right instruments to stimulate agricultural growth at the household level requires an accurate understanding of agrarian households’ behaviour. This thesis aimed to contribute to a better understanding of agrarian households, focusing on the institutional conditions shaping cooperation within polygynous households. Indeed, polygynous households are widespread in African societies, but their specific features are relatively neglected in the agricultural development literature. Moreover, the theory of collective action has, so far, been applied at the community-level, but rarely at the intra-household level. To address this knowledge gap, case studies of two ethnic communities, the Fulani and the Mossi, were conducted. The research explored the institutional arrangements shaping the allocation of resources within polygynous households and examined the structural conditions under which cooperation occurs. The second chapter of this thesis reviews the discourse on agricultural households’ behaviour. Reviewing the empirical evidence, the chapter examines the adequacy of existing economic conceptualisations of agricultural households and their generalisability to West-African settings. Drawing on insights from anthropology and feminist perspectives, the chapter highlights the shortcomings of conventional household models, and the failure to consider gender and intergenerational relations of production. The third chapter analyses the challenges underlying cooperation in agricultural households. The chapter uncovers the contractual arrangements shaping the allocation of resources for food production. Drawing on the natural resource management literature, the chapter examines how households’ member’s characteristics, including their socially accepted roles and responsibilities, shape their incentive structures and determine resource pooling. Chapter 4 examines an essential determinant of collective action: trust. The chapter investigates the correlation between trust and productive and reproductive activities. The chapter makes an innovative methodological contribution to the study of cooperation, applying an experimental trust game to co-wives in polygynous households. The critical review of the economic literature challenges the existing representations of agrarian households in sub-Saharan Africa. The review calls for a redefinition of the units of production and for cautious assessment of conventional economic theories. The review recommends a framework that encompasses the complexities and diversity of behaviour in agrarian households. Integrating theories from feminist and anthropological literature can support this endeavour. Chapter 3 reveals that the contractual arrangements embedded in the rules and norms defining socially-accepted behaviour, influence the patterns of intrahousehold resource mobilisation and the likelihood of cooperation among household members. Agricultural household members were found to pool, exchange or split resources based on their roles and positions within the household arena. Implicit monitoring and sanction systems were identified, which shape the incentive structures of agrarian household member and determine whether cooperation will occur. The final chapter revealed that trust can mediate cooperation between co-wives, depending on the nature of the activity. No correlation was found between trust and co-wives’ likelihood to pool labour on individual plots. However, a strong correlation was identified between trust among co-wives and income pooling for food purchase, highlighting the importance of uncertainty and of existing norms on the outcomes of cooperation in agricultural households. The thesis concludes that collective action in polygynous agrarian households does not occur in a vacuum. Rather, collective action is the outcome of several processes and mechanisms. Policymakers should be aware of these internal arrangements, and their implications for intra-household resource allocation. The success of agricultural policies depends on these considerations.
... According to Guest, Bunce and Johnson (2006) data saturation may be attained in as few as six interviews, depending on the total sample size of the population. However, the most important sign that data saturation has been reached is to recognize when no new data or themes are obtainable (Fusch & Ness, 2015;O'reilly & Parker, 2013). The researcher observed data saturation when no new categories or themes were being developed after about the sixth or seventh interview. ...
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound effects on Institutions of Higher Education throughout the world. The unprecedented impact on university campuses were diverse and complex as universities shutdown and adapted their operations to address the threat. Many universities mobilized their research competencies to contribute to managing the risk beyond the campus environment. Numerous institutions were unprepared for the consequences and struggled to respond to the demands. To better manage the pressures, crisis response teams were setup overnight. The Oklahoma State University, in the United States, established two incident management teams using the incident command system, to manage the response. The initial short duration response aimed to establish and increase the diagnostic microbiology testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2 in the state of Oklahoma. The extended duration response focused on reopening a college after the lockdown and implementing the pandemic precautions required for the return of staff, faculty, and students. The aim of this qualitative exploratory study is to critically evaluate the IMT member perceptions, attitudes and experiences, and the use of the ICS, during the IMT’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in the pursuance of providing recommendations for improved IHE usage of the ICS. As a result of the qualitative analysis of both IMT responses, numerous findings contributed to shaping the nineteen recommendations emanating from this study.
Background Existing evidence indicates that a significant amount of biomedical research involving animals remains unpublished. At the same time, we lack standards for measuring the extent of results reporting in animal research. Publication rates may vary significantly depending on the level of measurement such as an entire animal study, individual experiments within a study, or the number of animals used. Methods Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 18 experts and qualitative content analysis, we investigated challenges and opportunities for the measurement of incomplete reporting of biomedical animal research with specific reference to the German situation. We further investigate causes of incomplete reporting. Results The in-depth expert interviews revealed several reasons for why incomplete reporting in animal research is difficult to measure at all levels under the current circumstances. While precise quantification based on regulatory approval documentation is feasible at the level of entire studies, measuring incomplete reporting at the more individual experiment and animal levels presents formidable challenges. Expert-interviews further identified six drivers of incomplete reporting of results in animal research. Four of these are well documented in other fields of research: a lack of incentives to report non-positive results, pressures to ‘deliver’ positive results, perceptions that some data do not add value, and commercial pressures. The fifth driver, reputational concerns, appears to be far more salient in animal research than in human clinical trials. The final driver, socio-political pressures, may be unique to the field. Discussion Stakeholders in animal research should collaborate to develop a clear conceptualisation of complete reporting in animal research, facilitate valid measurements of the phenomenon, and develop incentives and rewards to overcome the causes for incomplete reporting.
Objectives This study aims to add to literature on the phenomenology of ultra-running, an extreme form of long distance running. Through application of reversal theory, the study seeks to extend knowledge of the motivations and experiences of ultra-runners as well as approaches to understanding ultra-endurance sport more generally. Design Post-positivist, qualitative, phenomenological. Method 10 recreational ultra-runners participated in semi-structured interviews in which they were introduced to the eight metamotivational states of reversal theory and asked to discuss their running motivations and experiences. Results A thematic networks analysis revealed a propensity for participants to experience a diverse range of reversal theory states when running, embodying Apter’s (2007) concept of psychodiversity. Participants revealed an orientation to both states in each pair of the four metamotivational domains of reversal theory; serious/playful, conformity/rebellious, mastery/sympathy, and self/other. Participant accounts of experiencing playful (paratelic) and other-orientated (alloic-sympathy) metamotivational states were particularly important to ultra-running phenomenology and its differentiation from mainstream sport. Conclusion Reversal theory has proven to provide an effective framework for exploring and theorising ultra-running phenomenologies. The psychodiversity documented by participants suggests that ultra-running and other ultra-endurance sports necessitate a diverse and dynamic metamotivational orientation. Application of this thesis to other ultra-endurance activities is encouraged.
Background : Adherence to insulin and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) is insufficient in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) worldwide and in Qatar. Little is known about the factors related to being aware of non-adherence and the beliefs related to non-adherence in this group. This qualitative study investigated factors related to awareness of, and beliefs about non-adherence, as well as the existence of specific action plans to combat non-adherence using the I-Change model. Methods : The target group was comprised of 20 Arab AYAs (17–24 years of age) with T1D living in Qatar. Participants were interviewed via semi-structured, face-to-face individual interviews, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the Framework Method. Results : Suboptimal adherence to insulin, and particularly to BGM, in AYAs with T1D was identified. Some AYAs reported to have little awareness about the consequences of their non-adherence and how this can adversely affect optimal diabetes management. Participants also associated various disadvantages to adherence ( e.g. , hypoglycemia, pain, among others) and reported low self-efficacy in being adherent ( e.g. , when outside home, in a bad mood, among others). Additionally, goal setting and action-planning often appeared to be lacking. Factors facilitating adherence were receiving support from family and healthcare providers, being motivated, and high self-efficacy. Conclusions : Interventions that increase awareness concerning the risks of non-adherence of AYAs with T1D are needed, that increase motivation to adhere by stressing the advantages, creating support and increasing self-efficacy, and that address action planning and goal parameters.
Full-text available
Conducting focus groups seems to be a process that is practically intuitive. However, this key practice in qualitative research requires that a novice facilitator must do his or her homework. This article describes the process by which I became more cognizant of the tools necessary to be successful in planning and running focus groups. The article provides information about books and articles that were useful in providing practical information. It also details the use of the "learning-by-doing" journey embarked upon at my institution, whereby we conducted 56 town hall meetings over a four month time period using a focus group approach to gain understanding about key constituents' beliefs about engagement at the institution.
Full-text available
Instrumentation rigor and bias management are major challenges for qualitative researchers employing interviewing as a data generation method in their studies. A usual procedure for testing the quality of an interview protocol and for identifying potential researcher biases is the pilot study in which investigators try out their proposed methods to see if the planned procedures perform as envisioned by the researcher. Sometimes piloting is not practical or possible so an "interviewing the investigator" technique can serve as a useful first step to create interview protocols that help to generate the information proposed and to assess potential researcher biases especially if the investigator has a strong affinity for the participants being studied or is a member of the population itself.
This paper examines how groupthink led to conflict in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), with a focus on the Challenger and Columbia shuttle tragedies. We will show that, although there were technical causes of the accidents, there are deeper root causes that constitute a recurring thread. Throughout NASA's history, there have been budgetary and scheduling constraints. In an attempt to meet these externally imposed restrictions, management has unconsciously and repeatedly fallen into the psychological tendencies of groupthink. A bulletproof attitude amongst NASA officials was a direct cause of the Challenger accident. Management began tolerating increasing amounts of “acceptable flight risks.” Management compromised safety, one of the quality components of the project management “triple constraint” of schedule, budget, and quality. As a result of this disdain for managing quality, the second accident occurred with a chilling sense of déjà vu. We will examine the root causes of the pressure on management, as well as the traps of conflict that have befallen management.