ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Land consolidation is a very effective land management planning approach that aims towards rural/agricultural sustainable development. Land reallocation which involves land tenure restructuring is the most important, complex and time consuming component of land consolidation. Land reallocation relies on land valuation since its fundamental principle provides that after consolidation, each landowner shall be granted a property of an aggregate value that is approximately the same as the value of the property owned prior to consolidation. Therefore, land value is the crucial factor for the land reallocation process and hence for the success and acceptance of the final land consolidation plan. Land valuation is a process of assigning values to all parcels (and its contents) and it is usually carried out by an ad-hoc committee. However, the process faces some problems such as it is time consuming hence costly, outcomes may present inconsistency since it is carried out manually and empirically without employing systematic analytical tools and in particular spatial analysis tools and techniques such as statistical/mathematical. A solution to these problems can be the employment of mass appraisal land valuation methods using automated valuation models (AVM) based on international standards. In this context, this paper presents a spatial based linear hedonic price model which has been developed and tested in a case study land consolidation area in Cyprus. Results showed that the AVM is capable to produce acceptable in terms of accuracy and reliability land values and to reduce time hence cost required by around 80%.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Demetris Demetriou*a,b
aSchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
bLand Consolidation Department, 131 Prodromou street, 1419 Nicosia, Cyprus
Land consolidation is a very effective land management planning approach that aims towards rural/agricultural
sustainable development. Land reallocation which involves land tenure restructuring is the most important, complex and
time consuming component of land consolidation. Land reallocation relies on land valuation since its fundamental
principle provides that after consolidation, each landowner shall be granted a property of an aggregate value that is
approximately the same as the value of the property owned prior to consolidation. Therefore, land value is the crucial
factor for the land reallocation process and hence for the success and acceptance of the final land consolidation plan.
Land valuation is a process of assigning values to all parcels (and its contents) and it is usually carried out by an ad-hoc
committee. However, the process faces some problems such as it is time consuming hence costly, outcomes may present
inconsistency since it is carried out manually and empirically without employing systematic analytical tools and in
particular spatial analysis tools and techniques such as statistical/mathematical. A solution to these problems can be the
employment of mass appraisal land valuation methods using automated valuation models (AVM) based on international
standards. In this context, this paper presents a spatial based linear hedonic price model which has been developed and
tested in a case study land consolidation area in Cyprus. Results showed that the AVM is capable to produce acceptable
in terms of accuracy and reliability land values and to reduce time hence cost required by around 80%.
Keywords: Land consolidation; land valuation; automated valuation models, hedonic price model, GIS
Land consolidation is considered to be the most effective land management planning approach1 for eliminating land
fragmentation2 and promoting agricultural and rural sustainable development. Land consolidation which is applied in
many countries around the world including 26 out 28 EU countries, consists of two main components: land reallocation
(or land readjustment) and the construction of agricultural infrastructure such as roads and irrigation networks. Land
reallocation is the most critical, complex and time-consuming part of the land consolidation process3,4 because it
involves the land tenure restructuring both in terms of ownership exchange and land parcels boundaries modification.
Land reallocation based on parcels’ land values because each landowner should receive after land consolidation a
property with approximately the same land value as the original. If this value exceeds the original value then the
landowner should pay the extra cost to the Land Consolidation Corporation and vice-versa. Therefore, land value is a
very critical parameter that directly affects the monetary interests of landowners hence it should be reliable, accurate and
fair among all landowners. This value can be the market value or the agronomic value5. In contrast to other countries, in
Cyprus the market value is utilized because agricultural land has broader development prospects hence it is attracted by
farmers and non-farmers as well.
In practice, in Cyprus, land valuation is a mass appraisal process6 carried out by the Land Valuation Committee (LVC)
which assigns a market value for each land parcel and its contents i.e. farmstead, wells etc. by employing the sales
comparison method that based on similar sales transactions occurred in the area concerned or the neighbourhoods. The
practical experience shows that the certain process faces some problems. In particular, it is time consuming hence costly
(it may take some months on a non-regular work basis) because the process is undertaken manually by inspecting all
parcels by the five members of the LVC. Furthermore and most importantly, outcomes present inconsistencies because
the LVC empirically tries to compare land parcels attributes that define land value, with the attributes of some typical
land parcels for which LVC assigned values based on sales transactions. As a result, due to not employing systematic
analytical tools such as GIS and thanks to the human weakness in estimating and processing so much information, it has
been shown a strong regional variation7 (within the case study area) of the coefficients of land valuation factors. This
variation that reflects the importance assigned by LVC for each factor has been revealed through geographically
weighted regression (GWR)8. Therefore, the process is not standardized, fully transparent and sometimes causes
unfairness and bias to the land reallocation hence it produces objections (officially or not) by landowners who usually
compare the land value assigned in their land parcels with other similar or neighbourhood parcels. Consequently,
Demetriou7 has proposed a framework involving a new land valuation process in land consolidation areas having in its
core automated valuation models (AVMs) 9,10 aiming to overcoming these problems.
AVMs are mathematically based computer software programs that are able to estimate the value of various types of
properties based on market analysis of a specified area and the characteristics of a certain group of properties stored in
appropriate databases for a given point of time9. Two well-known properties valuation methods are the sales comparison
method noted earlier and the hedonic regression approach involving that the value of a property is composed by the
value of its various attributes. Actually the two methods can be combined since usually the aim is the estimation of a
relationship among a dependent variable and one or more independent variables (attributes) based on known land values
for a set of properties. This process called calibration and it is the core of an AVM. Various methods have been used so
far among which multiple regression analysis (MRA) is the most traditional and popular method11 which is employed in
this research. In addition, several works include a spatial component i.e. GIS12,13,14,15 or they employ artificial intelligent
(AI) techniques as an alternative calibration approach instead of MRA, such as artificial neural networks (ANN)16, 17, 18,
19, expert systems20 , case based reasoning21, agent based models22 and genetic algorithms23 (GAs) which the latter two
have been arisen very recently.
In particular, GIS technology is nowadays a necessity for land valuation modeling9 because valuation process is
inherently spatial related and involves a great amount of data that can be easily stored, managed, analyzed and visualized
(e.g. value maps) through a proprietary GIS or ideally within a Computer Aided Mass Appraisal System (CAMA)24
integrated with the former. In addition, the huge GIS toolbox for spatial analysis provided in such systems and its
capability to integrate geo-information from various resources i.e. remote sensing, photogrammetry, airborne lidar
systems, mobile GIS and cetera, make them supreme instruments that open new horizons in land valuation in terms of
efficiency, effectiveness, reliability and accuracy. A raster based GIS has been used to assign a nominal asset values25 to
urban land consolidation area. Although the study is interesting it does not involve monetary values and quality
assurance is lack. It should be noted that while there is relatively rich literature about real estate valuation and namely for
residential properties, on the other hand, research related with land valuation of agricultural land and more specifically in
land consolidation areas is very rare.
In the light of the above, the aim of this paper is to present and discuss the development and evaluation of a hedonic
price AVM for a case study land consolidation area in Cyprus by utilizing linear MRA. Because sales transactions in the
area concerned were not adequate for accurate predictions7 three sample sets of land values (i.e. 10%, 15% and 20%)
provided by the LVC employed to estimate the values of the rest land parcels. Results are evaluated based on
international standards defined by the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) 6,9,26 showing that AVM is
capable to produce acceptable in terms of accuracy and reliability land values and to reduce time hence cost required by
around 80%. In this context, the structure of the rest of the paper involves Section 2 which focuses on the methodology
utilised for developing and assessing the hedonic price model followed by section 3 that presents the land consolidation
case study area and the land valuation factors involved in the model. Afterwards, section 4 discusses the outputs of the
model by employing statistical analysis and ratio studies. Eventually, conclusions and recommendations for further
research are sum up in section 5.
2.1 The development of the hedonic price model
Hedonic regression modeling is the oldest statistical calibration methodology has been utilized for estimating property
values gained the most attention since 60s early 70s27 until nowadays 28,29,30. As noted earlier, it is based on multiple
regression analysis (MRA) which is one of the most well-known statistical methods with huge range of applications
especially for prediction and forecasting. It involves the estimations of relationship among a dependent variable and one
or more independent variables. The general regression model relates Y to a function of X and β. This function can be
either linear or non-linear.
   + (1)
The dependent variable is Y whilst the independent variables denoted by X. The unknown parameters, denoted as β,
which may represent a scalar or a vector and represents random errors. In the case of linear function the development
of the above function involves a general multiple regression model with p independent variables as shown in the
equation below:
           (2)
where Xij is the ith observation on the jth independent variable, and where the first independent variable takes the value 1
for all i (so it is the regression intercept). is an error term for observation i.
It should be emphasised that the reliability of MRA outcomes depends on the satisfaction of four main assumptions33
related to the residuals i.e. the difference between the actual market value and the predicted value: (i) normality, (ii)
constant variance (homoscedasticity), (iii) linearity and (iv) independence, which discussed later in the application of the
2.2 International standards for quality assurnace
IAAO9 has defined standards and specifications for the development process of AVMs involving a number of steps: (i)
model specification, (ii) model calibration and (iii) model testing and quality assurance26. Specification involves the
definition of the valuation method i.e. sales comparison and the selection of independent variables will be included in the
model as predictors of the market value (depended variable) and; calibration is the process of testing model structure to
estimate variable coefficients/parameters using a different dataset employed for testing the performance of the model by
utilizing ratio studies26. Actually, specification and calibration is a common iterative process until statistical model
performance indices are acceptable. Both tasks are very important so as to develop an effective and accurate model. The
third step i.e. model testing and quality assurance involves various statistical diagnostic tests of the model performance
with a property sample (called holdout sample) that has not been used before in model calibration so as to ensure that it
fulfils the acceptable accuracy and reliability standards before its use. For this purpose ratio studies are employed that
encompasses four basic measures: (i) appraisal level (mean, median, weighted mean), (ii) variability-uniformity
(coefficient of dispersion-COD), (iii) reliability (confidence interval); and (iv) vertical inequities (price-related
differential-PRD, price related bias-PRB).
In particular, appraisal level aims to measure statistically how close appraisal are to real market values (or the LVC’s
values in our case) by employing primary measures of central tendency. While ideally the desire level is 1.0 i.e. appraisal
value equals the market value, an appraisal level between 0.90 and 1.10 is considered acceptable for any type of
property26 for certain confidence intervals. The evaluation of variability-uniformity measures the dispersion of ratios. In
general, the smaller the measure the better the uniformity, but extremely low measures suggest rather a problematic
calibration for many potential reasons i.e. sales chasing or non-representative sample. IAAO26 provides standards of
COD range for all type of properties. In our case, the standards for vacant land (with a range between 5.0 to 25.0) are
assumed because it is the closer category to agricultural land that is not exclusively involved in the list. Reliability
measures that are represented by the confidence intervals reflect the degree of confidence (for a certain percentage i.e.
95%) can be placed in a calculated statistic for a sample of appraised properties. A confidence interval noted in brackets
shows the upper and lower limits of a certain measure of central tendency and a desired level for any type of property
between 0.9-1.10. The measure of dispersion i.e. COD is a “horizontal” metric regardless of the value of individual
properties. In contrast, vertical inequities provide evidence about the accuracy of appraised individual properties. An
index for measuring vertical inequality is called price-related differential (PRD) which is calculated by dividing the mean
ratio by the weighted mean ratio. This statistic should be close to 1.0. Measures significantly above 1.0 show regressivity
i.e. low-value properties are appraised at a greater percentages market value than high-value properties. In contrast,
measures considerably lower than 1.0 indicate a progressivity, that is, low-value properties are appraised at smaller
percentages of market value than high-value properties. IAAO26 notes that PRD should be between 0.98 and 1.03.
Moreover, IAAO26 emphasizes that further to PRD, it is recommended to carry out a statistical test for price related bias
(PRB) as well, because it provides a more meaningful and easily interpreted index than the former. PRBs for which 95%
confidence interval fall outside the range of -0.10 to +0.10 indicate unacceptable vertical inequities. In addition to the
above metrics included in the ratio studies standards they have been also used the root mean squared error (RMSE), the
mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The former measures the discrepancies between the predicted values and the
actual observations whiles the latter measures scaled discrepancies. Such measures have been also used in other case
studies 23,30. Furthermore, in order to measure how the error deviates, the absolute percentage error estimated which
called forecasting error (FE)17.
3.1 The land consolidation area
Choirokoitia is a village in the Larnaca District of Cyprus, which is located southwest of Larnaca town (Figure 1). The
village is built on a hill with an average level of 230 m and the land consolidation area is located northwest of the village
in lowland with limited hills. The land consolidation area is included in an agricultural zone while on the east is almost
coincide with the main road that connects some of the mountainous villages of the District of Larnaca with the main
motorway in Cyprus. The land consolidation area has a size of 266 hectares and involves 488 land parcels (Figure 2).
The land use is mainly citrus, olives, various fruit trees and cereals. Some land parcels are irrigated through individual
drills and several land parcels are irrigated through a network connected with a water reservoir.
Figure 1. The location of Choirokitia village on the map Figure 2. The land consoliation case study area
of Cyprus
The land valuation in the certain area was carried out periodically from October 2008 until February 2009. The highest
land value has been defined in €35000 per decare (1000 m2) and the lowest in €2000. It should be noted that the LVC
separately valued any buildings included within the land i.e. a house, a farmstead, a drill, a fence and any isolated trees
included in the land e.g. large olive and carob trees.
3.2 Land valuation factors
All information regarding the case study area built within ArcGIS 10.0. In particular, information includes a cadastral
map (Figure 2) (provided at a scale of 1:5,000) showing the original situation before land consolidation which is joined
with three databases containing information regarding landowners, ownerships and land parcels. In addition, the GIS
data model involves the official land valuation map with an associated catalogue, a soil map, a zoning map and a contour
map. All this information employed to automatically extract (using some programming routines) the scores for each
parcel for fourteen land valuation factors extensively discussed by Demetriou7. These factors are grouped31 in two major
categories: internal and external in relation to the property. Each category can be split further in two sub-categories:
physical attributes and legal factors for the former and locational characteristics and economic conditions for the latter.
In particular, each category includes the followings factors regarding each parcel with variable’s name within
parentheses: physical attributes are: size (size) in squared meters, shape (shape) measured in parcel shape index called
PSI32, mean slope (slope) measures in percentage, mean elevation from sea level (elevation) in meters, aspect (aspect)
that is measured clockwise in degrees (i.e. 0 north, 90 east, 180 south and so on), existence of a stream (stream) and soil
type (soil) has been provided by the Geological Survey Department which involves two types: Skeletic-calcaric-
REGOSOLS and calcaric-lithic-LEPTOSOLS represented by the letter “A” and calcaric-CAMBISOLS and calcaric
REGOSOLS represented by the letter “B”. Legal factors involve the existence of irrigation rights (irrigation) for a
parcel. Locational characteristics are access through a registered road (access1), access through a registered pathway
(access2), the distance from residential zones (zone), the distance from the main road that connects the neighborhood
villages with the motorway (main_road) and the existence of sea view (sea_view). Economic conditions are land-
use/productivity (land_use) for the agricultural economic potential of a parcel which is reflected by the expected net
revenue per decare for various crops that has been provided by the Agricultural Department of Cyprus. The dependent
variable i.e. the market land value is measured in Euros per decare.
4.1 MRA results
As noted earlier, sales transactions for the consolidated area were note sufficient to predict land values, hence, three
sample sizes i.e. 10%, 15% and 20% of land parcels values assigned by the LVC used for that purpose. In contrast to
many statistical experiments that use a random sampling, in this case it is very important that the selected land parcels
should adequately represent in terms of features the whole population. Therefore, parcels were selected based on their
attributes to cover all the range found in the population. In particular, they were selected all the parcels having the min,
max and mean score of all the continuous land valuation factors and then parcels were selected randomly to cover (as
much as possible) the whole case study area. Similarly, categorical factors (i.e. those take a binary value), parcels were
selected proportionally based on the frequency of each score (i.e. 0 or 1) and randomly taking into account to keep a
location-based balance.
The multiple regression analysis model ran with the three basic methods for selecting variables i.e. forward selection,
backward elimination and stepwise variable selection. The second method gave slightly better results from the other two.
Therefore, the basic model summary statistics and the number of variables included in the final model for each sample
are presented in the following Table 1.
Table 1: Summary statistics for the linear model
Size, stream, slope, access1, zone
Access2, size, slope, acces1, irrigation, zone
Access2, size, access1,irrigation, aspect, slope, zone
The square of the correlation coefficient R2, that indicates the proportion of the observed variability of the dependent
variables which is explained by the independent variables, is quite high for all samples with the highest for sample-1
(which is close to that of sample-3). This indicates that even a small sample which includes only 10% (i.e. 49 land
parcels) of the total population may fit a model very well as shown graphically for sample 1 in the Q-Q plot of the
standardized residuals in Figure 3a where the points fall close to a straight line.
Figure 3. a) The normal Q-Q plot of the standardized residuals; b) The distribution of residuals; c) The scatterplot of
studentised residuals against the standardized predicted value, all for sample 1
Similarly, the adjusted R2 (adjusted for the number of parameters in the equation and the number of data observations)
which is always smaller than R2 reflects how well the model would fit another sample from the same population is
equally the highest for samples 1 and 3. The estimated regression equations for each sample revealed that the signs of all
coefficients are reasonable, namely size, stream, slope, zone and aspect having negative signs whilst access1, access2,
and irrigation having positive signs. A critical issue among the independent variables included in each final model is the
potential correlation and the multicollinearity i.e. the linear relationship. The former statistic is measured by Pearson
correlation coefficient and the latter by the tolerance. The Pearson’s correlation matrix showed that for all samples all
potential combination of variables have a correlation less or equal to 0.5 which is a very acceptable result. Similarly,
tolerance that may take values between 0 to 1 (0 means there is a linear relations and 1 means there is not a linear
relationship) is in most cases equal or more than 0.7 except in two cases where irrigation and zone variables have a
tolerance around 0.5-0.6. However, this fact does not suggest a problem since the value is quite far from 0.
The four MRA assumptions examined in the LVC model are all fulfilled indicating reliability of results. In particular,
normality is confirmed for all three samples by utilizing Shapiro-Wilk test with an output value for sample-1 0.979 (1
means that sample data are perfectly normal) with a level 0.132 which is more than 0.05 and a standard deviation of
standardized residual 0.963. Similarly, sample-2 model results in a value 0.983, with a level 0.436 and a standard
deviation of standardized residual 0.957; and Sample -3 model results a value of 0.980, with a level 0.584 and a standard
deviation of standardized residual 0.946. Normality assumption is evident from the distribution chart which is close to
normal as shown for sample 1 in Figure 3b. Homoscedasticity is also confirmed since the scatterplot of studentised
residuals against the standardized predicted value do not present any pattern as shown for instance in Figure 3c for
sample 1.
Regarding linearity assumption, F-test showed that there is a linear relationship between the dependent and the
independent variables because the null hypothesis (i.e. there is no linear relationship between the dependent and the
independent variables) has been rejected since the F ratio is small (based on the magnitude of the regression coefficients)
for all samples with a high significance level. However, visual inspection showed that slightly non-linear function (e.g.
exponential) could fit for the variables size, slope and zone. Independence of observations also confirmed by Durbin-
Watson test for the three samples since all values are between1.50-2.5 while values close to 2 involves no correlation. In
addition, spatial autocorrelation tests (p-value and z-score) within ArcGIS showed that the p-value is not statistically
significant hence we cannot reject the null hypothesis, meaning that it is quite possible for 90% confidence level that the
spatial distribution of residuals’ values is the result of a random spatial process.
4.2 Ratio analysis results
All the quality assurance measures noted in section 2.2 estimated. In particular, results show that all the appraisal level
statistics, that is the three main measures of central tendency the mean, median and weighted mean of ratios are within
the acceptable by IAAO26 range, namely, between 0.9 and 1.10 revealing an initial positive sign. A stronger relevant
indication is the use of confidence intervals to determine whether it can be reasonably concluded that the noted appraisal
levels differ from the established performance standards in a particular instance. Therefore, it has been confirmed that
with 95% confidence interval estimates for the mean and the median relevant standard has been met since all measures
fall within the noted range suggesting reliability evidence. Furthermore, the coefficient of dispersion-COD is within the
noted standard range for vacant land (i.e. between 5.0-25.0), ranging from 11.66 the minimum (for sample 3) to 13.83
the maximum (for sample 1), which are quite far from the highest acceptable value i.e. 25. COD is improved as the
sample increases while samples 3 and 2 present similar COD. Similarly, the price-related differential-PRD is almost the
same for all samples and it is marginally within the acceptable range 0.98-1.03 but that for sample 1. This potentially
shows a slight regressive tend i.e. low-value properties are appraised at a greater percentages market value than high-
value properties. Similarly, the estimated price related bias-PRB ranges from -0.087 to -0.036 for the three samples
which is within the acceptable limits i.e. -0.10 to 0.10, showing a trend towards the lower limit. Therefore, PRB shows
that for 95% confidence interval, assessment levels do not change by more than 10% when values are halved or doubled.
Furthermore, it was found that RMSE and MAPE decreases as the sample increases. However, the decrease is very slight
between sample-2 and sample-3 suggesting that no significant performance improvement can be achieved if the sample
increased more than a limit. Similarly, the best percentage of FE for 10% resulted from sample 2 and 3 with around 57%
of land parcels values estimated with accuracy better than 10% and around 32% of land parcels values estimated with
accuracy better than 20% compared with the true values. Therefore, it seems that a sample of 15% is adequate to
accurately predict with a discrepancy between 0%-20% from true values for the 90% of parcels. In alignment with this
finding, the AVM could carry out the site work of the LVC by employing around 80% less resources because the LVC
could carry out only 5 site valuation visits for assigning land values to the selected 15% sample of parcels (i.e. 73
parcels) instead of 25 days to assess all the 488 land parcels of the consolidated area. These figures show a proportional
reduction of both time and costs. Further to these savings, the most beneficial parameters provided by the AVM is the
quality of valuation in terms of comprehensiveness (a great number of variables are taken into account) consistency
(precise comparison of variables scores), reliability (predictions based on international standards) and transparency (the
analytical explanation of a land value is possible) of outcomes with an equity impact to the landowners involved.
The current mass land valuation process employed in land consolidation schemes is not efficient and reliable thus
authorities involved need to introduce AVMs based on international standards. Clearly, the AVM presented in this paper
is considerably more efficient than the traditional empirical process in terms of time, costs, accuracy, reliability,
consistency and transparency. Ongoing research focused on employing different calibration methods for developing
AVMs based on a non-linear function and artificial neural networks, in order to investigate and compare the performance
for all the three models.
The data used for this research have been kindly provided by various Departments of the Public Sector in Cyprus.
Therefore, I would like to thank very much the Departments of: Land Consolidation, Land and Surveys, Geological
Survey and Agriculture and the people assisted me to get and discuss further details regarding these data.
[1] Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J., and See, L., 2012 “Land consolidation in Cyprus: why is an integrated planning
and decision support system required?” Land Use Policy, 29 (1), 131–142 (2012).
[2] Van Dijk, T., [Dealing with Central European land fragmentation], Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon, (2003).
[3] Thomas, J., “What’s on regarding land consolidation in Europe?” Proceedings of the XXIII FIG congress,
shaping the change, October 813, 2006, Munich, Germany. Available from: http://www.fig.
net/pub/fig2006/papers/ts80/ts80_03_thomas_0311.pdf [Accessed 19 January 2013].
[4] Ayranci, Y., “Re-allocation aspects in land consolidation: a new model and its application” Journal of
Agronomy, 6 (2), 270277 (2007).
[5] FAO, [Overview of land value conditions], FAO, Rome, (2003).
[6] International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO)., [Standard on Mass Appraisal of Real property].
IAAO, Kansas City, Missouri, (2013).
[7] Demetriou, D., “Assessing the land valuation process carried out in land consolidation: the need for a new
land valuation framework”, (to be submitted), (2015).
[8] Brunsdon C., Fotheringham S., Charlton M., “Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring
spatial nonstationarity” Geographical Analysis, 28, 281-289, (1996).
[9] International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) “Standard on Automated Valuation Models
(AVMs)”, IAAO, Chicago, Illinois, (2003).
[10] Downie, M., and Robson, G., “Automated valuation models: an international perspective” The Council of
Mortgage Lenders, London, (2007).
[11] Bernknopf, R., Gillen, K., Wachter S., Wein, A., “Using econometric and geographic information systems
for property valuation: A spatial hedonic pricing model”. Working paper, Spatial Integration Laboratory for
Urban Systems (SILUS), Wharton University of Pennsylvania, (2008).
[12] Longley, P., Higgs, G., Martin, D., “The predictive use of GIS to model property valuations” International
Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 8(2), 217-235, (1994).
[13] Wyatt, P., “The development of a GIS-based property information system for real estate valuation”
International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11 (5), 435-450, (1997).
[14] Iman, A., "GIS-MRA techniques in property valuation: a framework for implementation” Bulletin
Geoinformaci, 3(1), 63-79, (1999).
[15] Hamilton S., and Morgan, A., “Integrating lidar, GIS and hedonic price modeling to measure amenity values
in urban beach residential property markets” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(2), 133-141,
[16] Kathman, R., “Neural networks for the mass appraisal of real estate” Computers, Environment and urban
Systems, 17 373-384, (1993).
[17] Nguyen, N., and Cripps A., “Predicting housing value: a comparison multiple regression analysis and
artificial neural network” Journal of Real Estate Research, 22 (3), 313-336, (2001).
[18] Garcia, N., Gamez, M., Alfaro, E.,”ANN+GIS: An automated system for property valuation”
Neurocomputing, 71, 733-742, (2008).
[19] Pao, H., “A comparison of neural network and multiple regression analysis in modeling capital structure”
Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 720-727, (2008).
[20] Kilpatrick, J., “Experts systems and mass appraisal” Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 29 (4/5),
529-550, (2011).
[21] Gonzalez, A., Laureano-Ortiz, R., “A case-based reasoning approach to real estate property appraisal”
Experts Systems with Applications, 4, 229-246, (1992).
[22] Breen, J., Goffette-Nagot, F., Jensen, P., “An agent-based simulation of rental housing markets” Working
Paper, Archive ouverte HAL, France, (2009).
[23] Ahn, J., Byun, H., Oh, K., Kim, T., “Using ridge regression with genetic algorithm to enhance real estate
appraisal forecasting” Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 8369-8379, (2012).
[24] Pashoulis, V., “The general valuation law and the CAMAS in the Land and Surveys Department in Cyprus”
Proc. FIG Working 2011. Marrakech, Morocco, May 18-22, (2011).
[25] Yomralioglu, T., Nisanci, R., Yildirim, V., “An Implementation of Nominal Asset Based Land
Readjustment” Proc. Strategic Integration of Surveying Services, FIG Working Week 2007, Hong Kong
SAR, China, 13-17, (2007)
[26] International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO), “Standard on Ratio Studies” IAAO, Kansas City,
Missouri, (2013).
[27] Smith, T.R., “Multiple regression and the appraisal of single family residential properties” The Appraisal
Journal, 39 (2), 277-84, (1971).
[28] Milla, K., Thomas, M.H.., Ansine, W., “Evaluating the Effect of Proximity to Hog Farms on Residential
Property Values: A GIS-Based Hedonic Price Model Approach” URISA Journal, 17,(1), 27-32, (2005).
[29] Eckert, J., “Computer-assisted mass appraisal options for transition and developing countries” International
Studies Program, Working paper 06-43, Georgia State University, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies,
[30] Schulz, R., Wersing, M., Werwatz, A., “Automated valuation modeling: A specification exercise” SFB 649
Discussion Paper 2013-046, University of Aberdeen Business School, Technical University of Berlin,
[31] Wyatt, P., “The development of a property information system for valuation using geographical information
system (GIS)” Journal of Property Research, 13 (4), 317-336, (1996).
[32] Demetriou, D., See, L. and Stillwell, J., “A Parcel Shape Index for Use in Land Consolidation Planning”
Transactions in GIS, 17(6), 861882 (2013).
[33] Norusis, M., [SPSS 13.0 Guide to Data Analysis], Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2005).
... Van Thunen's theory (Sincler, 1967) also strongly relates to location, especially distance to the city, which primary force the transport cost and finally parcel value. Location reflects proximity of a farmland not only to a city centre but also to paved roads (Choumerta and Phélinasb, 2015), the homestead (Kuethe et al., 2011), forest and water bodies (Demetriou, 2015). Grausová et al. (2014) adds that the distance of the agricultural land from a larger city play a significant role as well. ...
Full-text available
Many different characteristics affect the land prices. This work attempts to analyse the characteristics of agricultural parcels, which significantly affect the variability of agricultural land prices. The article presents the methodology of selection land parcel characteristics , rules for the selection of factors and possibility of automatic acquisition of data in mass valuation process. The research aims at selecting determinants of agricultural land parcels price and evaluate theirs significance in a local market for the purpose of land values map elaboration. Using advanced statistical analysis of a non-linear influence of a parcel inherent characteristics on its price we proved that in the relatively small area, like commune, only a few characteristics are essential, They are: parcel size, shape and location expressed by distance to the commune centre, paved roads and homestead buildings. Therefore, these ones should be used for elaboration of land values map. Soil quality and a cropland type although significant for the land prices do not diversify land prices in local market. The novelty of the research relays on determination of non-linear influence of parcel characteristics on variation of agricultural land values based on the correlation ratio (η eta). The research was conducted for the undeveloped agricultural lands located in southwest Poland, the rural municipality Krotoszyce.
... Similar observations have been made by Bitner et al. (2017) for the south part of Poland where the price of land property decreases with growing distance to the city centre by about 10 PLN (2.35 EUR) with each kilometre. Location also reflects the proximity of farmland to roads (Choumert and Phélinas 2015), the homestead (Kuethe et al. 2011), forest and water bodies (Demetriou 2015). Greater distances to the homestead determine smaller revenues due to greater transport-related costs (Demetriou 2016). ...
Full-text available
The paper aims to define the location factor (LF) as a synthetic, quantitative measure of agricultural parcel locations. Multivariate comparative analysis and the original formula based on the weighted distance to selected places, were used to determine the location factor. The factor allows the objective description of parcel locations and replaces several locational characteristics by one variable which simplifies the computational process and could be used in many applications. The LF also works as a similarity measure in parcel clustering and could be applied in a variety of spatial analyses at the municipality level, in public investment planning, land consolidation or land value map making.
Purpose The research aims to establish importance scheme of geospatial factors for land valuation activities that may serve as an eye-opener and aid the concerned government agencies in drafting land valuation policies and guidelines to achieve a sound land governance and administration. It specifically identifies and weighs geospatial valuation factors to establish their importance. Design/methodology/approach The research involves discussions and survey questionnaires given to land experts (i.e. appraisers, environmental planners, land economist, geodetic engineers and assessors) who indicated their opinions on influence of geospatial factors on land value. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is then used to weigh the factors in terms of its importance. Findings The result was then compared with the multiple regression analysis (MRA) taking into consideration the standardized regression coefficient of the 15 factors. The AHP method found out the major road accessibility and slope direction as the most and least influential factors, respectively, while surprisingly MRA found major road accessibility not significant at p < 0.05 level of significance. Research limitations/implications The research generally reflects the sub-urban type of study area; hence, inclusion of other road types such as express ways and subways and performing sensitivity analysis of AHP are suggested in future studies. Practical implications The findings of the study will provide information of concerned government agencies in improving valuation activities, as well as to update values regularly based on the geospatial factors. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first effort to rank geospatial factors with analytic hierarchy analytic process that further considered both their negative and positive influences on land value. The approach surmounts the flaw and shortcomings of empirical methods of identifying importance of factors.
Full-text available
Land consolidation is an effectual land management procedure aiming to sustainable development. A critical issue in land consolidation schemes is land valuation which is a type of mass appraisal that is generally carried out using an empirical process. As a result, the process is time consuming, costly and the outcomes are not adequately accurate, reliable and consistent. A solution to these problems is the employment of automated valuation models (AVMs). In this context, this paper presents the development, implementation and evaluation of two hedonic price models based on a linear and a non-linear function combined with a geographical information system (GIS), applied to a case study area in Cyprus. Models tested for quality assurance based on international standards. The evaluation based on international standards showed that the both models produced very good results and a small sample of land values provided by the Land Valuation Committee (LVC) is adequate to automate the land valuation process resulting in an adequate accuracy, reliability and consistency. Consequently, the AVM is highly efficient compared to conventional land valuation methods since it may considerably reduce the time and resources used and provide transparency because the process has been converted from empirical to systematic, analytical and standardized.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The land-use problems confronting urban areas are usually traced to rapid urbanization and massive urban growth in the recent decades. Such changes will result in a need for significant acquisition of urban land for public purposes such as, roads, schools, hospitals, parks. In order to provide new services as rapidly as they are needed to support rapid urbanization local government authorities apply Land Readjustment (LR) which is one of the most important tools in planning process. The determination of land valuation factors is essential in a LR project. In a value-based LR project, the main aim is to give back a new land parcel to a landowner with the same value as that owned before the project. For this purpose, using GIS, some land valuation criteria which can affect the total perceived value of a land parcel are spatially examined and value parameters are determined from the combination of these criteria. This approach is called as " Nominal Asset Based Land Readjustment (NABLR) ". In this study, NABLR approach has been applied and examined in a pilot project area in the city of Trabzon, Turkey. In this content value distribution of land is obtained with different parameters by formulating some criteria of land values, to find out the unit value of land using nominal land valuation method rather then the prices determined by market conditions. Nominal unit values determined as a function of the factors that affect the value of the land were dealt as pixel based and the implementation of the model was carried out for LR. The parametric criteria used in expression of land values in pixel units were obtained by choosing a combination of factors of land value by utilizing the characteristics of spatial analysis of GIS.
Full-text available
Area shape analysis has been a subject of focus for research in geography and other disciplines for many years. However, existing area shape indices present significant weaknesses for the analysis of land parcels in an agricultural context as they do not measure shape in an appropriate, reliable or explicit manner. This article presents a new parcel shape index (PSI) which integrates six geometric parameters through multi-attribute decision-making, combined with value functions for parameter standardization. The superior performance of the new PSI in relation to three existing indices is demonstrated through a case study area in Cyprus. The methodology can be applied in other contexts aimed at assessing the quality of a particular shape compared to an optimum.
The decline of small-scale farms and the dramatic increase in the size of corporate animal operations in recent years has sparked controversy over the impacts of confined animal feeding operations on surrounding residential communities. This study examines the applicability of geographic information systems (GIS)-based hedonic price modeling for evaluating impacts to residential property values from feeding operations, particularly hog operations. Residential property attributes were derived and compiled in a GIS. These attributes were used to construct a hedonic model to examine the relationship between distance to hog farms and property sales prices. Results indicate a negative and significant impact on property value from hog operations. A comparison of the results from this study with those of several other GIS-based hedonic models indicates that GIS-based hedonic price modeling is a promising method for assessing property value damages associated with animal operations, for evaluating potential impacts when siting new operations, and for developing setback guidelines.
Market value predictions for residential properties are important for investment decisions and the risk management of households, banks, and real estate developers. The increased access to market data has spurred the development and application of Automated Valuation Models (AVMs), which can provide appraisals at low cost. We discuss the stages involved when developing an AVM. By reflecting on our experience with md*immo, an AVM from Berlin, Germany, our paper contributes to an area that has not received much attention in the academic literature. In addition to discussing the main stages of AVM development, we examine empirically the statistical model development and validation step. We �find that automated outlier removal is important and that a log model performs best, but only if it accounts for the retransformation problem and heteroscedasticity.
GIS is a technology which is ideally suited to analysis of the market values of properties, since such values are based upon spatial comparisons as well as individual property attributes. Great Britain now has a new mechanism of local taxation, the council tax, which is based upon the capital values of properties. Central to the implementation of this tax has been the potentially controversial assignment of properties to valuation ‘bands’. This paper posits that a geographical model embedded within a GIS provides an alternative means of devising credible capital values, and anticipates some of the prospects for the use of GIS in local revenue-raising.
In this paper, a method for mass appraisal is presented which is based entirely on the estimation of value differences between properties. The value difference between two properties is calculated by multiplication of the differences in the characteristics considered, with marginal adjustment factors for those characteristics. The marginal adjustments used in this method are calculated using artificial neural networks. Artificial neural networks are special computer programs which establish a network of very simple operating units. Each unit transforms its input according to the same function, resulting in an output. The input can come from outside the network (input unit) or from other units within the network. The amount to which the output of one unit contributes to the input of another unit is controlled by the weights. The definition of these weights is done by “training ” the network. The artificial neural network for appraisal can be trained with “patterns” of characteristics of properties and the market value of those properties. The training of the network can be considered as the market analysis with the available sales data. Market analysis is an essential part of each mass-appraisal process. The market analysis using neural networks provides substantially more data to the appraisal process than other methods of market analysis.
Agricultural land is very fragmentated in the Central European countries. This situation hampers the emergence of a private commercial farming structure. Governments and non-governmental organisations debate on programs and instruments, but these far-reaching and costly options would be unnecessary if the situation were to improve through autonomous development. This article models the causal chain connected to land fragmentation, explores alternative development paths through various scenarios and tentatively points out which scenario is most likely.
This study considers real estate appraisal forecasting problem. While there is a great deal of literature about use of artificial intelligence and multiple linear regression for the problem, there has been always controversy about which one performs better. Noting that this controversy is due to difficulty finding proper predictor variables in real estate appraisal, we propose a modified version of ridge regression, i.e., ridge regression coupled with genetic algorithm (GA-Ridge). In order to examine the performance of the proposed method, experimental study is done for Korean real estate market, which verifies that GA-Ridge is effective in forecasting real estate appraisal. This study addresses two critical issues regarding the use of ridge regression, i.e., when to use it and how to improve it.