Content uploaded by Francisco J. Ruiz-Ruano
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Francisco J. Ruiz-Ruano on Oct 15, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=imdn20
Download by: [Rutgers University] Date: 15 October 2015, At: 01:18
Mitochondrial DNA
The Journal of DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis
ISSN: 1940-1736 (Print) 1940-1744 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/imdn20
DNA barcoding of Iberian Peninsula and North
Africa Tawny Owls Strix aluco suggests the
Strait of Gibraltar as an important barrier for
phylogeography
Jorge Doña, Francisco J. Ruiz-Ruano & Roger Jovani
To cite this article: Jorge Doña, Francisco J. Ruiz-Ruano & Roger Jovani (2015): DNA
barcoding of Iberian Peninsula and North Africa Tawny Owls Strix aluco suggests the
Strait of Gibraltar as an important barrier for phylogeography, Mitochondrial DNA, DOI:
10.3109/19401736.2015.1089573
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1089573
Published online: 14 Oct 2015.
Submit your article to this journal
View related articles
View Crossmark data
http://informahealthcare.com/mdn
ISSN: 1940-1736 (print), 1940-1744 (electronic)
Mitochondrial DNA, Early Online: 1–4
!2015 Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1089573
SHORT COMMUNICATION
DNA barcoding of Iberian Peninsula and North Africa Tawny Owls Strix
aluco suggests the Strait of Gibraltar as an important barrier for
phylogeography
Jorge Don
˜a
1*
, Francisco J. Ruiz-Ruano
2*
, and Roger Jovani
1
1
Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Estacio
´n Biolo
´gica de Don
˜ana (CSIC), Avda. Americo Vespucio S/N, Sevilla, Spain and
2
Departamento de
Gene
´tica, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
Abstract
Eight subspecies have been proposed within the Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) species. However,
recent molecular data have challenged this view, encouraging further work in this species
complex. Here we reevaluated the taxonomic status between the North-Western African Tawny
Owl, S. a. mauritanica, and its closest Iberian Tawny Owl population (from the S. a. sylvatica to
S. a. aluco clade) separated by the Strait of Gibraltar. The Tawny Owl is a non-migratory and
territorial species, and juvenile dispersal is restricted to a few kilometers around the natal site.
This limited dispersal and the barrier imposed by the Strait of Gibraltar predicted a strong
differentiation between the two populations. We tested this using DNA barcoding, Bayesian
phylogenetic and species delimitation analysis. We found that an 81.1% of variation is due to
the intergroups variation. In addition, the inter–intraspecific distances distribution revealed a
barcoding gap among the two subspecies. Also, posterior probabilities and the P
AB
value
allowed to reject the hypothesis that observed degree of distinctiveness is due to random
coalescence processes. These findings clearly support the Strait of Gibraltar as an isolating
barrier for this species. The subspecific status is confirmed and species status is even suggested
for S. a. mauritanica.
Keywords
Bird taxonomy, DNA barcoding,
mitochondrial control region,
phylogeograpy, subspecies
History
Received 15 June 2015
Revised 19 August 2015
Accepted 20 August 2015
Published online 13 October 2015
Introduction
During the past years, bird barcoding has boosted the reassess-
ment of within-species taxonomy, and three quarters of proposed
subspecies have been unsupported by barcoding (Kerr et al.,
2007). In parallel, more robust tools for molecular species
delimitation have been developed based, for instance, on the
existence of a greater genetic distance between interspecific than
intraspecific sequences (the barcoding gap concept; Brown et al.,
2012; Hebert et al., 2004; Puillandre et al., 2012; Ratnasingham &
Hebert, 2013) or coalescence theory (Masters et al., 2011; Pons
et al., 2006). This has improved the integration between molecular
and classical taxonomic approaches (i.e. integrative taxonomy,
Dayrat, 2005; Padial et al., 2010; Will et al., 2005).
The Tawny Owl species (Strix aluco) comprises eight
recognized subspecies distributed from North Africa to Asia
(Holt et al., 1999, Figure 1). The subspecies are differentiated by
plumage color and body size, but often overlap in these characters
due to large individual variation (Holt et al., 1999). In fact, Brito
(2005) found that S. a. sylvatica and S. a. aluco differentiation was
not supported by molecular data. Instead, she found three genetic
clades among European Tawny Owls, which could be explained
by three glacial refugia in Iberia, Italy and Balkans (Brito, 2005).
This shows that taxonomic status of Tawny Owl subspecies should
be rethought.
The North-west African Tawny Owl, S. a. mauritanica, is the
only representative of the Tawny Owl in Africa (Holt et al., 1999).
Interestingly, the closest Tawny Owl population (from the Iberian
clade, according to Brito (2005), and classically termed as
belonging to S. a. sylvatica) is located in the European side of the
Strait of Gibraltar. These two populations show morphological
differences, being African birds larger (wingspan up to 20%
larger) and always gray-brown (Holt et al., 1999), in contrast to
sylvatica that presents rufous and gray morphs (with intermediate
variants) (Galeotti & Cesaris, 1996, Holt et al., 1999).
The biogeographic relevance of the Strait of Gibraltar for most
species inhabiting its margins remains unknown (Husemann et al.,
2014). For the Tawny Owl, the distance between the two margins
of the strait (14.4 km) is within the dispersal range of juveniles
(Coles & Petty, 1997; Cramp, 1985). This would suggest that
there could be regular gene flow between the two continents and
thus likely little genetic differentiation. However, previous
morphological evidence (see above) and preliminary results by
Brito (2005) would suggest the opposite scenario.
Here, we studied the differentiation between S. a. mauritanica
and S. a. sylvatica-aluco. We explored the genetic divergence
presented by Brito (2005) but using a new molecular marker,
individuals from both sides of the Strait of Gibraltar, DNA
barcoding and species delimitation analysis as has been used in
recent studies involving species discovery and delimitation in
*Jorge Don
˜a and Francisco J. Ruiz-Ruano contributed equally to this
study.
Correspondence: Jorge Don
˜a, Department of Evolutionary Ecology,
Estacio
´n Biolo
´gica de Don
˜ana (CSIC), Avda. Americo Vespucio S/N,
Sevilla 41092, Spain. E-mail: jdona@ebd.csic.es
Downloaded by [Rutgers University] at 01:18 15 October 2015
subspecies complexes (Besansky et al., 2003; Hajibabaei et al.,
2007; Masters et al., 2011; Pre
´vot et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2006;
Wilson et al., 2013). This allowed, for the first time, to: (1)
reevaluate the taxonomic status of S. a. mauritanica using a DNA
barcoding approach and a species delimitation analysis, and (2)
investigate the degree of genetic structure between S. a.
mauritanica and the Iberian clade of S. a. sylvatica-aluco
subspecies in their closest populations.
Materials and methods
Sampling
We collected feathers from 16 Tawny Owls from nine locations in
South Iberia (Iberian clade of S. a. sylvatica-aluco) and four
S. a. mauritanica individuals from two locations in Ceuta, North
Africa (Supplementary material Table S1, Figure 1). Eight
S. a. sylvatica-aluco and two S. a. mauritanica individuals were
collected from wildlife recovery centers. The rest of individuals
were captured in the field with mist nets. Subspecies were
identified based on morphological characters (Svensson et al.,
2009). We collected one primary body feather from each
individual and stored it into individually labeled plastic bags
with silica gel until their utilization for DNA analysis.
PCR amplification and DNA sequencing
We extracted DNA from each sample separately following
the method described by Malago
´et al. (2002) and used the
resulting product as template to amplify the CR2 of the
mitochondrial DNA. This marker presents resolution to resolve
little differences among species in the Strix genera and is variable
enough for phylogeographic studies (Brito, 2005). PCR were
performed in 25 mL reaction volumes with 1 mL DNA template,
1PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl
2
, 200 mM dNTPs, 0.4 mmol/mLof
each primer. PCR cycles followed an initial denaturation step of
5 min at 95 C, 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 C, 30 s at 55 C, 30 s
at 72 C, a final extension step of 7 min. We used the primers
ND6Z (50-ACAACCCCATAATACCGCGAAGG-30) and D20
(50-GTGATGGAT CTTACTAACACC-30) getting fragments of
ca. 700 bp (Barrowclough et al., 1999; Brito, 2005). PCR products
were sequenced in both directions using Sanger method by
Macrogen, Europe (Holland). Sequences were submitted to
GenBank with accession numbers KP977552-KP977571.
Data analysis
Sequences were visually edited with Geneious v4.8 (Drummond
et al., 2009) and aligned with MAFFT v7.029b (Katoh &
Standley, 2013) applying LINSI options. The final alignment
included Strix uralensis (GenBank acc. no. DQ087169.1) as an
outgroup taxon.
We computed a matrix of pairwise distances using the Kimura
2-parameter (K2P) models with the sppDistMatrix function from
the R package SPIDER v1.3–0 (Brown et al., 2012). We then
performed a barcoding gap analysis and threshold calculations
with the local minima function (Brown et al., 2012). The
specimen identification accuracy was calculated using the ‘‘best
close match’’ (BCM) method presented by Meier et al. (2006)
with the bestCloseMatch function.
We performed a species delimitation analysis with the Genious
v4.8 plug-in (Masters et al., 2011) to calculate the Rosenberg’s
P
AB.
This parameter indicates the probability of reciprocal
monophyly of the lineage of interest and its nearest defined
lineage, under a random branching model (Rosenberg, 2007). We
determined the appropriate model of sequence evolution with the
JMODELTEST 2 program (Darriba et al., 2012). Then, we
performed a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis with MrBayes v3.2
(Ronquist et al., 2012). Convergence of each analysis was
evaluated using Tracer v1.4.1 (Rambaut & Drummond, 2007).
We also calculated the haplotype and nucleotide diversities with
DnaSP v5.10.01 (Librado & Rozas, 2009) and tested the genetic
structure among subspecies with an AMOVA in Arlequin v3.5.1.2
(Excoffier & Lischer, 2010).
Results
Twenty individuals from both subspecies were morphologically
identified (Supplementary material Table S1). We obtained a final
alignment of 678 bp. We found 17 haplotypes, with a haplotype
Figure 1. (A) Tawny Owl world distribution. Distribution of subspecies follows Holt et al. (1999) and it is approximate. (B) Sampling localities in
Iberian Peninsula (Strix aluco sylvatica-aluco clade, following Brito 2005) and North African individuals (S. a. mauritanica) used in the current study.
Numbers correspond to locality numbers from Supplementary material, Table S1. Note that localities 3 and 7 are wildlife recovery centers. This, jointly
with the approximate map by Holt et al. (1999) explains why two localities are apparently outside the distribution of the species.
2J. Don
˜a et al. Mitochondrial DNA, Early Online: 1–4
Downloaded by [Rutgers University] at 01:18 15 October 2015
diversity of 0.97. We found 124 polymorphic sites, with an
average number of differences of 25.5 and a nucleotide diversity
of 0.038. The AMOVA analysis showed that an 82% of variation
is due to the intergroup variation (18% intragroup variation),
showing an Fst ¼0.81 (p50.00001).
The frequency distribution of pair-wise sequence distances
revealed a clear barcoding gap (Figure 2) with a mean interspe-
cific distance (±SD) of 9% ± 0.88 and a mean intraspecific
distance of 1% ± 1 (Figure 2). The threshold value separating intra
from interspecific distances was ca. 5% (Figure 2). In addition,
the specimen identification accuracy for both subspecies
was 100%.
The Bayesian tree showed the African and the Iberian
individuals as belonging to two distinctive clusters with high
support (Posterior probabilities ¼1) (Supplementary material;
Figure S3). In addition, the species delimitation analysis rejected
the null hypothesis of a random coalescent process (P
AB
50.01).
Discussion
Here we provide the first verification of the DNA barcoding
accuracy and its potential utility for Tawny Owl taxonomy.
Moreover, our results even suggest that in this case, mauritanica
could be a sister species of the aluco-sylvatica main European
clade. Hence, our results support the hypothesis that the Strait of
Gibraltar has acted as an important geographic barrier during the
recent history of the Tawny Owl phylogeography. In a previous
study, Brito (2005) showed that European populations of Tawny
Owl comprise three connected clades, and concluded that the
Iberian Peninsula acted as refugia during Pleistocene glaciations.
Our results clarify the taxonomic issues among these two
subspecies, suggesting that mauritanica clearly differentiated
during this time because of the geographic barrier of the Strait of
Gibraltar. However, our results have to be considered as
preliminary until a more exhaustive sampling, especially of
S. a. mauritanica, will be performed.
Here we obtained a genetic distance of 9% between the two
studied subspecies analyzing interspecific CR2 distances. This is
close to the 11.5% value obtained with the same molecular marker
in short-tailed tentative sister albatross (Phoebastria albatrus)
species, which led to consider them as different species (Eda
et al., 2012; Eda & Higuchi, 2012). Indeed, the 9% distance
reported here is also higher than the inter-specific distances
obtained for CR1 among sister species of albatrosses, which
ranged from 4.5 to 7.2% (Abbott & Double, 2003; Burg &
Croxall, 2001, 2004; Rains et al., 2011). Moreover, K2P genetic
distances followed by posterior probabilities of Bayesian trees and
P
AB
of Rosenberg’s have been considered as the most restrictive
parameters for single locus based species delimitation analysis
(Boykin et al., 2012). Thus, our results support the subspecies
status of this morphological subspecies and even suggest that the
North African mauritanica subspecies could be a sister species of
sylvatica-aluco European clade. Further molecular studies
addressing taxonomic issues on this species are encouraged
because this will likely change the taxonomy of the group, with
obvious implications in conservation biology.
Data accessibility
DNA sequences: GenBank accessions: KP977552-KP977571
BOLD public project-ID: Tawny Owl subspecies [TOSP];
http://dx.doi.org/10.5883/DS-JD2FJ1
Supplementary material: Figure S3, Table S1 and the align-
ment are deposited in Figshare; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/
m9.figshare.1466715
Acknowledgements
Authors thank Ricardo Campos for field work logistics. Many thanks to
GOES people who collected Iberian samples (in alphabetical order):
Ricardo Campos, Francisco Jime
´nez-Cazalla, Alejandro Colorado, David
Cuenca, Darı
´o Delgado, Francisco Delgado, Jose
´Luis Garzo
´n, Javier
Espinosa, Jaime Gonza
´lez, Alberto Gonza
´lez, Javier Gonza
´lez, Juan
Manuel Jime
´nez, Jose
´Manuel Pe
´rez, Antonio Sepu
´lveda. We also want to
thank all CHAGRA ringing group members who collaborated collecting
North African samples. Many thanks for Andalusian and Ceutan species
recovery centers. Finally, thanks to Isabel Afa
´n (LAST, EBD) for her help
with Figure 1.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Special thanks
to all GOES (The Ornithological Group of the Strait of Gibraltar)
members for the economic support for the genetic analysis. JD and RJ
were supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economı
´a y Competitividad
(Severo Ochoa scholarship SVP-2013-067939 and Ramo
´n y Cajal
research contract RYC-2009-03967, respectively).
References
Abbott CL, Double MC. (2003). Phylogeography of shy and white-capped
albatrosses inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences: Implications
for population history and taxonomy. Mol Ecol 12:2747–58.
Barrowclough GF, Gutie
´rrez RJ, Groth JG. (1999). Phylogeography of
spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis) populations based on mitochondrial
DNA sequences: Gene flow, genetic structure, and a novel biogeo-
graphic pattern. Evolution 53:919–31.
Besansky NJ, Severson DW, Ferdig MT. (2003). DNA barcoding of
parasites and invertebrate disease vectors: What you don’t know can
hurt you. Trends Parasitol 19:545–6.
Boykin LM, Armstrong KF, Kubatko L, De Barro P. (2012). Species
delimitation and global biosecurity. Evol Bioinform Online 8:1–37.
Brito PH. (2005). The influence of Pleistocene glacial refugia on tawny
owl genetic diversity and phylogeography in Western Europe. Mol Ecol
14:3077–94.
Brown SD, Collins RA, Boyer S, Lefort MC, Malumbres-Olarte J, Vink
CJ, Cruickshank RH. (2012). Spider: An R package for the analysis of
species identity and evolution, with particular reference to DNA
barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 12:562–5.
Burg TM, Croxall JP. (2001). Global relationships amongst black-browed
and grey-headed albatrosses: Analysis of population structure using
mitochondrial DNA and microsatellites. Mol Ecol 10:2647–60.
Burg TM, Croxall JP. (2004). Global population structure and taxonomy
of the wandering albatross species complex. Mol Ecol 13:2345–55.
Coles C, Petty S. (1997). Dispersal behavior and survival of juvenil tawny
owls (Strix aluco) during the low point in a vole cycle. Biology and
conservation of owls of the northern hemisphere: Second international
symposium. USDA Forest Service NC-190.
Cramp S. (1985). The birds of the western Palearctic. Vol.4. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Figure 2. Boxplot of interspecific and intraspecific genetic distances. The
median is indicated by the line inside the box and whiskers show data
range. The density plot shows the determination of the threshold genetic
distance for species identification. The transition between intra- and
interspecific distances is the dip in the density graph, here approximately
at 5%.
DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1089573 DNA barcoding of Tawny Owl subspeciess 3
Downloaded by [Rutgers University] at 01:18 15 October 2015
Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. (2012). jModelTest 2:
More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:
772.
Dayrat B. (2005). Towards integrative taxonomy. Biol J Linnean Soc 85:
407–15.
Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Cheung M, Heled J, Kearse M. (2009).
Geneious 4.8. New Zealand: Biomatters, Auckland.
Eda M, Koike H, Kuro-o M, Mihara S, Hasegawa H, Higuchi H. (2012).
Inferring the ancient population structure of the vulnerable albatross
Phoebastria albatrus, combining ancient DNA, stable isotope, and
morphometric analyses of archaeological samples. Conserv Genet 13:
143–51.
Eda M, Higuchi H. (2012). Does the short-tailed albatross Phoebastria
albatrus consist of two species? Jap J Ornithol 61:263–72.
Excoffier L, Lischer HE. (2010). Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of
programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and
Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–7.
Galeotti P, Cesaris C. (1996). Rufous and grey colour morphs in the
Italian tawny owl: Geographical and environmental influences. J Avian
Biol 27:15–20.
Hajibabaei M, Singer GAC, Hebert PDN, Hickey DA. (2007). DNA
barcoding: How it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics
and population genetics. Trends Genet 23:167–72.
Hebert PD, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. (2004). Identification
of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2:1657–63.
Holt W, Berkley R, Deppe C, Enrı
´quez Rocha P, Petersen JL, Rangel
Salazar JL, Segars KP, Wood KL. (1999). Tawny owl (Strix aluco). In:
del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E, editors.
Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
Husemann M, Schmitt T, Zachos FE, Ulrich W, Habel JC. (2014).
Palaearctic biogeography revisited: Evidence for the existence of a
North African refugium for Western Palaearctic biota. J Biogeogr 41:
81–94.
Katoh K, Standley DM. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment
software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol
Biol Evol 30:772–80.
Kerr KC, Stoeckle MY, Dove CJ, Weigt LA, Francis CM, Hebert PD.
(2007). Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American
birds. Mol Ecol Notes 7:535–43.
Librado P, Rozas J. (2009). DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive
analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–2.
Malago
´W, Franco HM, Matheucci E, Medaglia A, Henrique-Silva F.
(2002). Large scale sex typing of ostriches using DNA extracted from
feathers. BMC Biotechnol 2:19.
Masters BC, Fan V, Ross HA. (2011). Species delimitation-a Geneious
plugin for the exploration of species boundaries. Mol Ecol Resour 11:
154–7.
Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng PK. (2006). DNA barcoding and
taxonomy in Diptera: A tale of high intraspecific variability and low
identification success. Syst Biol 55:715–28.
Padial JM, Miralles A, De la Riva I, Vences M. (2010). The integrative
future of taxonomy. Front Zool 7:1–14.
Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell
S, Vogler AP. (2006). Sequence-based species delimitation for the
DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst Biol 55:595–609.
Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. (2012). ABGD,
automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation.
Mol Ecol 21:1864–77.
Pre
´vot V, Jordaens K, Sonet G, Backeljau T. (2013). Exploring species
level taxonomy and species delimitation methods in the facultatively
self-fertilizing land snail genus Rumina (Gastropoda: Pulmonata).
PLoS One 8:e60736.
Rains D, Weimerskirch H, Burg TM. (2011). Piecing together the global
population puzzle of wandering albatrosses: Genetic analysis of the
Amsterdam albatross Diomedea amsterdamensis. J Avian Biol 42:
69–79.
Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. (2007). Tracer v1.4. Available at: http://
beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD. (2013). A DNA-based registry for all animal
species: The barcode index number (BIN) system. PLoS One 8:e66213.
Rosenberg NA. (2007). Statistical tests for taxonomic distinctiveness
from observations of monophyly. Evolution 61:317–23.
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S,
Larget B, et al. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic
inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:
539–42.
Smith MA, Woodley NE, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. (2006).
DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed
polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera:
Tachinidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3657–62.
Svensson L, Mullarney K, Zetterstro
¨m D, Grant PJ (2009). Collins bird
guide: the most complete guide to the birds of Britain and Europe.
Harper Collins.
Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD. (2005). The perils of
DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst Biol 54:
844–51.
Wilson JJ, Sing KW, Sofian-Azirun M. (2013). Building a DNA barcode
reference library for the true butterflies (Lepidoptera) of Peninsula
Malaysia: What about the subspecies? PLoS One 8:e79969.
Supplementary material available online
4J. Don
˜a et al. Mitochondrial DNA, Early Online: 1–4
Downloaded by [Rutgers University] at 01:18 15 October 2015