A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL PAPER
New Rock Abrasivity Test Method for Tool Life Assessments
on Hard Rock Tunnel Boring: The Rolling Indentation Abrasion
Test (RIAT)
F. J. Macias
1
•F. Dahl
2
•A. Bruland
1
Received: 18 June 2015 / Accepted: 20 September 2015 / Published online: 6 October 2015
Springer-Verlag Wien 2015
Abstract The tunnel boring machine (TBM) method has
become widely used and is currently an important presence
within the tunnelling industry. Large investments and high
geological risk are involved using TBMs, and disc cutter
consumption has a great influence on performance and
cost, especially in hard rock conditions. Furthermore,
reliable cutter life assessments facilitate the control of risk
as well as avoiding delays and budget overruns. Since
abrasive wear is the most common process affecting cutter
consumption, good laboratory tests for rock abrasivity
assessments are needed. A new abrasivity test method by
rolling disc named Rolling Indentation Abrasion Test
(RIAT) has been developed. The goal of the new test
design and procedure is to reproduce wear behaviour on
hard rock tunnel boring in a more realistic way than the
traditionally used methods. Wear by rolling contact on
intact rock samples is introduced and several rock types,
covering a wide rock abrasiveness range, have been tested
by RIAT. The RIAT procedure indicates a great ability of
the testing method to assess abrasive wear on rolling discs.
In addition and to evaluate the newly developed RIAT test
method, a comprehensive laboratory testing programme
including the most commonly used abrasivity test methods
and the mineral composition were carried out. Relation-
ships between the achieved results from conventional
testing and RIAT results have been analysed.
Keywords Hard rock tunnel boring Rock abrasiveness
Cutter wear assessments Rock abrasivity test method,
Rolling Indentation Abrasion Test (RIAT)
1 Introduction
1.1 General
Cutter consumption plays a significant role in performance
and cost during tunnel boring. Reliable assessments of
cutter consumption are needed for planning and risk
management, especially in hard rock conditions.
Many factors are influencing the number of cutters
consumed in hard rock Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs).
Normal TBM operation results mainly in abrasive wear of
the cutter rings, which has been verified to be proportional
to cutter rolling distance by several researches (Rostami
1997; Bruland 1998; Frenzel et al. 2008).
There are some accepted and commonly used test
methods for estimation of rock abrasiveness, Cerchar test
(Valantin 1974), Laboratorie Central des Ponts et Chaus-
se
´es (LCPC) test (Normalisation Franc¸aise P18-579 1990)
and the Abrasion Value Steel (AVS) test method (Dahl
et al. 2012) In addition, some researches have been
developing studies to classify rock abrasiveness in the last
decade (Plinninger and Restner 2008; Thuro and Ka
¨sling
2009; Dahl et al. 2012). Plinninger and Restner (2008) give
an overview of some of the most representative testing
methods and classification of the results. Thuro and Ka
¨sl-
ing (2009) performed a comparative study using three
methods for abrasivity assessments introducing a classifi-
cation of abrasiveness for soil and rock. Dahl et al. (2012)
presented classifications of the Norwegian University of
Science and Technology (NTNU)/SINTEF drillability test
&F. J. Macias
javier.macias@ntnu.no; fjmaciasr@gmail.com
1
Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Faculty of
Engineering Science and Technology, NTNU,
7491 Trondheim, Norway
2
SINTEF, Building and Infrastructure, Rock and Soil
Engineering, Trondheim, Norway
123
Rock Mech Rock Eng (2016) 49:1679–1693
DOI 10.1007/s00603-015-0854-3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.