Content uploaded by Sandra Leaton Gray
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sandra Leaton Gray on Oct 09, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Research summary
Curriculum development in the International
Baccalaureate Diploma Programme
Extracted from a research report prepared for the IB by:
Sandra Leaton Gray, David Scott and Euan Auld
Institute of Education, University of London
July 2014
Executive summary
This report examines the development and revision of curriculum in countries, regions and
jurisdictions around the world. In addition, it provides examples to further inform the International
Baccalaureate’s (IB) own curriculum development of the Diploma Programme (DP). The
researchers identified thirteen countries and jurisdictions that would serve as productive locations
for learning in relation to curriculum development and reform: Finland; Massachusetts, USA;
Scotland; Ontario, Canada; Netherlands; Mexico; Germany; England; Chile; Singapore; New
Zealand; Victoria, Australia; and Queensland, Australia. The first phase of the study involved the
collection of information about the characteristics of curriculum reform in these sites. In the second
phase, the researchers investigated the characteristics of the IB’s own curriculum development in
relation to curriculum development in the selected locations. Data sources included government
documents, books and academic and professional journal articles. The researchers collected
information about a wide range of issues, from the organization of schooling in the different sites,
to the aims and purposes of the curriculum and arrangements for delivery and assessment.
Findings
1. Review cycles
With the exception of Ontario, most mass systems of education do not have established curriculum
review cycles. Curriculum reviews tend to be ad hoc, unplanned, dependent on the political cycle,
and responses by governments to particular problems. The IB, on the other hand, uses a strongly
defined and structured seven-year process of curriculum review in relation to its programmes.
2. Flow of reform
The point of entry for reform in most countries is at the apex of the power structure. The general
direction of flow is fragmented and multi-directional. Reforms generally lose their shape, structure
and contents during the exploration, development, re-contextualization, implementation and
institutionalization phases of the reform process. In most countries institutionalizing processes are
underdeveloped. In contrast, the IB’s curriculum reform processes demonstrate coherence across
all parts of the organization, although this may in some cases be compromised by an inconsistent
uptake of continuing professional development by IB teachers, perhaps due to cost considerations.
3. Curriculum aims
Most reforms of education systems emphasize assessment driven, goal directed and fact-based
forms of learning. In addition, most education systems have similar curriculum standards or
curriculum aims/objectives, and are driven by summative processes of assessment, which appear
to be influenced by the imposition of external tests such as the Programme for International
Student Assessment (PISA). There is a risk that the emphasis on high stakes assessment at the
end of the DP may affect the integrity of some of the pedagogical approaches adopted by the IB,
particularly when schools have not had face-to-face visits since the initial authorization.
4. Subjects and forms of knowledge
In all sites, there is a curricular emphasis on language (literacy), mathematics and science.
Although most of the countries the authors sampled do not use text books written by government
agencies, most nevertheless preserve traditional modes of teaching and strong insulations
between subjects in school curriculum. In contrast, in addition to an emphasis on language,
mathematics and science, the IB specifically “aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring
young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural
understanding and respect.” (IBO, 2014).
5. Modes of progression
Most countries start formal schooling as early as possible, often between the ages of 4-5.
Generally they use progression models, which prioritize educational extension rather than
increasing the complexity of, and deepening, learning. Knowledge is therefore expressed in terms
of lower and higher domain-levels, with the former having to be taught before the latter, and
sequenced correctly. This is similar to the DP, particularly with some courses offered at a higher
level (HL). However, the extended essay and other elements of the curriculum may help to deepen
learning.
6. Curriculum reviews
As a supra-national organization, the IB is in a unique position within education internationally. Its
privileged position allows it to set the tone for contemporary curriculum review. Currently there is a
coherent system of review in place that appears to be operating across all parts of the
organization, and this is a positive aspect of the IB’s work. However, caution is recommended
here, despite the ostensibly thorough framework for review. Although carefully drafted guidelines
for the review process were intended to serve as a useful project planning tool, the process
underpinning curriculum review tends to be overly complex and detailed, which may result in a
form of “guideline exhaustion”. This runs the risk of trivializing certain aspects of the reform
process, making it into a tick box exercise for some participants.
Recommendations
The IB should consider:
Developing strategies for enhancing the uptake of professional development courses in
relation to curriculum review. For example, the IB could investigate the likely impact of
reducing the cost of professional development courses, or introducing a credit system with
minimum requirements for teacher reaccreditation (or a combination thereof).
Increasing the number of quality assurance visits rather than relying on paper-based
verifications after initial authorization. These could be conducted at standard or irregular
intervals, depending on the availability of resources and other practical considerations.
Undertaking an empirical study to investigate the current alignment between the IB’s
intended curriculum and its implementation in schools.
Limiting the number of reviews a draft curriculum may undergo, in order to simplify the
process.
Ensuring teacher involvement and action research at various stages to ensure teachers’
experience and knowledge are taken into account, and that the process is suitably
democratic and pluralist.
Developing the role of the teacher as an embedded researcher, with implications for
professional development practices and the curriculum development and review process.
Streamlining the review guidelines and making them less detailed and prescriptive,
although there should continue to be an emphasis on their value as a project planning tool.
References
International Baccalaureate Organization (2014). IB Mission and Strategy. Retrieved on
March 7, 2014 from http://www.ibo.org/mission/
This summary was extracted by the IB Research department. A copy of the full report is available at
http://www.ibo.org/research. For more information on this study or other IB research, please email
research@ibo.org.
To cite the full report, please use the following:
Gray, SL, Scott, D and Auld E. 2014. Curriculum development in the International Baccalaureate Diploma
Programme. The Hague, NL. International Baccalaureate Organization.