ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of a 4-week dialogic reading intervention on the receptive and expressive language skills of 4-5 year old children from low-income families. Control group with pretest – posttest model in experimental design was used. Forty-six children attending a public kindergarten in Denizli were randomly placed in an experiment and a control group. Data were collected through “TEDİL-3” and “Personal Information Form.” In the experimental group, 8 picture books were read by the researcher two times a week for four weeks through dialogic reading techniques. In the control group, the same 8 picture books were read by the classroom teacher through traditional reading. The results showed advances in children's language development in favor of the experimental group. Suggestions related to literature were discussed.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 ( 2015 ) 754 – 758
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
1877-0428 © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of Academic World Education and Research Center.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.172
ScienceDirect
7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, (WCES-2015), 05-07 February 2015, Novotel
Athens Convention Center, Athens, Greece
Effects of the Dialogic and Traditional Reading Techniques on
Children’s Language Development
Zeynep Ceren Simsek
a
*
, Nesrin Isıkoglu Erdogan
a
a
Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Denizli,20200, Turkey
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of a 4-week dialogic reading intervention on the receptive and expressive
language skills of 4-5 year old children from low-income families. Control group with pretest posttest model in experimental
d
esign was used. Forty-six children attending a public kindergarten in Denizli were randomly placed in an experiment and a
co
ntrol group. Data were collected through “TEDİL-3” and “Personal Information Form.” In the experimental group, 8 picture
book
s were read by the researcher two times a week for four weeks through dialogic reading techniques. In the control group,
the same 8 picture books were read by the classroom teacher through traditional reading. The results showed advances in
children’s language development in favor of the experimental group. Suggestions related to literature were discussed.
© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Peer-review under responsibility of Academic World Education and Research Center.
Keywords:Dialogic reading; traditional reading, language development
1. Introduction
Language as a vital part of children’s development provides opportunities for learning, for communicating and
bu
ilding relationships with others as well as for enabling children to make sense of the world around them (Brock &
Rankin, 2008). It is well recognized that interaction with more skilled speakers, provide literacy rich home and
school environment and engage in interactive book reading are important activities to support preschool age
children’s language development (Berk, 2013). Mainly, studies show that parent- child reading is related to outcome
m
easures such as language growth, emergent literacy, and reading achievement (Bus, IJzendoorn &Pellegrini, 1995).
* Zeynep Ceren Simsek. Tel.+4-345-543-345.
E-mail address: cyesilyurt@pau.edu.tr
© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of Academic World Education and Research Center.
755
Zeynep Ceren Simsek and Nesrin Isıkoglu Erdogan / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 ( 2015 ) 754 – 758
Reading books to children at early age has been found very useful for gaining vocabulary, communication and
memory skills. (Powell, Diamond, Burchinal & Koehler, 2010; Sim & Berthelsen, 2014).
Research studies indicate that there is
a relationship exists between the regularity of children’s book reading
experiences and their receptive vocabulary and early literacy skills. (Sutton, Sofka, Bojczyk, and Curenton, 2007). A
lon
g with regularity of book reading, a child’s interaction level also linked to his or her learning. Researchers find
that dialogical reading that requires higher level of children’s interaction has a positive impact on the language skills
of children from low-income families (Zevenbergen, Whitehurst & Zevenbergen, 2003).
Both at home and in school, shared book reading involves a
n adult reading aloud to a child or group of children
(Hindman, Skibbe, & Foster, 2014; Gormley & Ruhl, 2005). Two main types of shared book reading “monologic
(trad
itional)” and “dialogic” are evident in the literature. Gormley & Ruhl (2005) defined monologic reading as; “a
ve
rbatim reading of the text with no pausing for questions or verbal interaction between adult and child.” On the
contrary, dialogic reading involves shifting roles of adult and children while reading.
The concept of dialogic reading has emerged from the work
s of Whitehurst and his colleagues (Whitehurst et al.,
1988). The main principle of dialogic reading is to teach children beco
me a storyteller instead of passively listening
to the story. In the process of dialogic reading the adult assumes the role of an active listener, asking questions,
adding information, and prompting the child to increase the sophistication of her or his descriptions of the material in
the picture book (Lonigan, & Whitehurst, 1998). To ensure interaction the PEER and CROWD sequences are used
in dialogic reading (Whitehurst et al.,1994). PEER refers to the following: (a) Prompt the child to talk about the
book, (b) Evaluate the child’s responses, (c) Expand the child's response by rephrasing and adding information to it
and (d) Repeat the prompt to make sure the child has learned from the expansion. CROWD refers to the five types of
prom
pts (a) Completion prompts: fill-in-the blank questions, (b) Recall prompts: qu
estions that require the child to
remember aspects of the book, (c) Open-ended prompts: statements that encourage the child to respond to the book
i
n his or her own words, (d) Wh-prompts: what, where, and why questions, and (e) Distancing prompts : questions
th
at require the child to relate the content of the book to aspects of life outside the book (Zevenbergen et al., 2003).
The effects of dialogic reading have compared by
several experimental studies. Arnold, Lonigan, Whitehurst, &
Epstein, (1994) implemented a one month, home-based dialogic reading intervention
. The results indicated larger
effects on the language skills of children than a similar amount of typical picture book reading. Similarly, dialogic
reading intervention both at home and school have produced positive gains for children from low income families
(Whitehurst et al., 1994). In a recent study, Lonigan, Purpura, Wilson, Walker and Clancy-Menchetti (2013) have
f
ound that children who received the small group dialogic reading, phonological awareness, or letter knowledge
interventions experienced more growth than the children who received only their classroom curriculum. The effects
of dialogic reading intervention on other cultures and languages were also examined. Opel, Ameer and Aboud
(200
9) conducted a 4-week dialogic reading intervention with rural Ban
gladeshi preschoolers and found that dialogic
program increased from 26% to 54% children’s expressive v
ocabulary. In another dialogic reading intervention
conducted in Egypt resulted in a higher level of phonological awareness (Elmonayer, 2013). In Turkey, Akoglu,
Ergul & Duman (2013) conducted an experimental study with nine children living in an orphanage. After the four
w
eek dialogic reading intervention, they found that children’s both receptive and expressive language skills were
improved.
The present study attempted to contribute to this line of
work on reading and language development by examining
the benefits of dialogic reading in a Turkish preschool program. The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy
of a 4-week dialogic reading intervention on the recep
tive and expressive language skills of 4-5 year old children
from low-income families. For this purpose this st
udy also aimed to understand the following questions:
1) Is there a difference between the pre and posttest express
ive and receptive language scores in the experiment
group?
2) Is there a difference between the pre and posttest express
ive and receptive language scores in the control
group?
3) Is there a difference between the experiment and con
trol groups’ expressive and receptive language scores?
756 Zeynep Ceren Simsek and Nesrin Isıkoglu Erdogan / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 ( 2015 ) 754 – 758
2. Method
2.1. Design and procedure
An experimental study was designed to examine the ef
fects of dialogic reading on children’s language
development. The design was a prepost assessment of an experiment and con
trol group. This design was intended
to examine and to compare reading techniques on children’s language development. For this purpose the present
study included two groups. One is experimental group in which the dialogic reading (DR) was implemented and
second is the control group in whish dialogic traditional reading was implemented (TR).
The pre-tests were administered before implementing DR and T
R activities. All the children in the two groups
were tested individually and the assessment was administered in a quiet room at the school. Eight picture story books
w
ere selected for the reading activities and the same books were read both in the experiment and the control group.
Books were 1114 pages in length and had a quarter page of text w
ith full page illustrations in the background.
For the experimental group, the dialogic reading activit
ies were developed using PEER and CROWD techniques
and the researcher visited to the classroom two times a week and implemented DR activities. DR activities lasted
approximately 20 minutes and conducted in a small group of 7-9 children. For the control group, the classroom
teach
er received and used the same 8 books over the 4-week period during the regular language activities. The
classroo
m teacher was asked to conduct her regular language activities with the children. After the 4 weeks of
implementation, the post-tests were administered in both groups.
2.2. Participants
Children recruited for this study were from low-income families and attended a public kindergarten in central
Denizli. T
he consent was obtained from MEB officials and the parents to assess children’s language development
and demographic information. The participants were 46 five-year-olds, enrolled in two diff
erent classrooms.
Participant classrooms were randomly placed in the experiment and control group. The control group of this study
in
cluded 23 children (% 44 female and %56 male). On average, the children were 65.69 months of age (SD= 3.03),
w
ith an age range from 60.00 to 71.00 months. The experimental group of this study included 22 children (%
41F
emale and &59 male). On average, the children were 66.75 months o
f age (SD = 3.29), with an age range from
60.00 to 73.00 months.
2.3. Measures
In order to determine the language development levels of
the children “Test of Early Language Development-
Third Edition” (TELD-3), developed by Hresko, Reid ve Hammill (1999) has been used. This test is a normative,
v
alid and credible measure tool, developed in the United States of America in order to measure the receptive and
expressive oral language skills of the children whose ages ranging from 2 years 0 month and 7 years 11 months. It is
commonly used with the aim of diagnosing children who have language disorders in the early ages, showing weak
and strong sides of their language developments, giving information about development process and researching.
TELD-3, has been identified as Test of Early Language Development-Third Edition: TurkishVersion (TELD-3:T) in
th
e international literature with the contributions of PRO-ED publishing (Topbas, 2010). TELD has been used twice
as p
re-tests and post tests.
2.4. Results
The aim of this study was to identify the effect of dialog
ic reading upon the receptive and expressive language
developments of the preschool children in a group of 4-5 years. The results of pre-test and posttest about their
recep
tive language were shown in the Table 1.
757
Zeynep Ceren Simsek and Nesrin Isıkoglu Erdogan / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 ( 2015 ) 754 – 758
Table1. Comparisons of pre and posttest of children’s receptive language scores
Group
N
X
SS
t
Control (TR)
Pretest
23
102,26
15,09
-1,10
Posttest
23
105,04
13,24
Experiment (DR)
Pretest
22
98,77
14,82
-5,15
Posttest
22
111,40
9,60
Table 1 showed that there was no significant difference between the pre-test and the post test receptive
lan
guage scores on children’s in the control group (t
23
= .02, p<0.05). This meant that there were no significant
change children’s language scores in traditional reading group. On the other hand; there was a significant difference
between the pre-test and the posttest receptive scores of the children i
n the experiment group. (t
23
= .000, p<0.05).
This result showed that the children’s receptive language sores were significantly increased on the posttest. In order
to compare pre and posttest expressive language scores of children, independent samples t-tests were performed.
Ta
ble 2 shows the means, standard deviation
s, t statistics and significant levels for the control and experiment
groups.
Table2. Comparisons of pre and post test of children’s expressive language scores
Group
N
X
SS
t
Control (TR)
Pretest
23
107,73
14,07
,018
Posttest
23
107,67
8,08
Experiment
(DR)
Pretest
22
106,04
10,41
-5,75
Posttest
22
116,31
7.31
Table 2 indicated that, the expressive language scores of c
hildren in the control group did not reflect a statistically
significant differences between the pre-test and the post test scores (t
23
= .098; p<0.05). In other words, the receptive
language scores of the children did not change in the traditional reading group. On the contrary, the expressive
language scores of children in the experiment group reflected a statistically significant increase in the posttest (t
23
=
.000; p<0.05). This result indicated that children in the dialogical reading group increased their expressive language
scores after 4 week intervention. The comparisons of the pre and posttest of children’s total language scores are
presented in the Table 3.
Table3. Comparisons of the pre and post test of children’s total language scores
Group
N
X
SS
t
p
Control (TR)
Pretest
23
106,43
15,67
-
,654
,520
Posttest
23
108,04
11,01
Experiment (DR)
Pretest
22
103,59
13,56
-
5,65
,000
Posttest
22
117,13
8,13
The traditional reading group’s total language scores indicated that the means of pre- and posttest scores were
nonsignificant (t
23
= .520, p<0.05). On the other hand, the dialogical reading group’s total language scores indicated
that pre- and posttest scores produces a statistical
ly significant difference (t
23
= .000, p<0.05). This result showed that
total language scores of children increased after four week dialogic reading intervention.
3. Results and Implications
This study has reported the results of a four week readin
g intervention on children’s language development. The
quantitative analyses indicated that participation in the dialogic reading intervention had significantly changed
children’s’ receptive, expressive and total language scores. First, the findings suggested that the dialogic reading
facilitated a change in participant children’ both expressive and receptive language. This result was supported by
several researches. According to these researches, dialogic reading intervention had positive contributions to
children’s vocabulary and early literacy skills (Lonigan & Whitehurst, 1998; Whitehurst, et al. 1988). Dialogic
reading supports all fields of language development as well as developing especially the expressive language
development in comparison to traditional reading. This may be due to the interactive nature of the dialogic reading.
In the traditional reading, a child just listens to the story and has limited opportunity to express himself/herself. On
758 Zeynep Ceren Simsek and Nesrin Isıkoglu Erdogan / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 ( 2015 ) 754 – 758
the other hand, dialogic reading gives many opportunities to the child to make much more sentences than the adult
reading the book, to involve in and to freely express his/her opinions. Such interactions may result in improvements
in expressive and receptive language development. In a similar experimental research, the effects of traditional
reading and interactive reading have been compared and concluded that children in the interactive reading groups
have more language and early literacy skills (Hargrave & Senechal, 2000). Similar studies have found that
in
teractive reading interventions both at home (LeRoux, 2013) and in schools (Lever & Senechal, 2011) contributed
to the narrative and expressive language skills of the 4-5 year old children.
Mainly, this study suggests that the dialogical reading is an
important factor in supporting language development
of children. The dialogic reading is a highly effective reading technique in order to enhance the language
development of preschool age children. Therefore, both parents and early childhood teachers are urgently needed to
inform about the dialogic reading techniques. These techniques could be disseminated through the interactive
seminars or the Internet for both parents and teachers.
Even though this research pointed out many important findin
gs and implications, it has some limitations. Our
study had a limited number of participants that did not allow us to generalize across all children at various ages.
Future research needs to be conducted with a bigger sample from various age groups and should attempt to replicate
the findings of this study in other samples to guarantee the generalisability of the findings.
References
Akoglu, G., Ergu, C., Duman, Y. (2014). Etkilesimli kitap okuma: Korunmaya muhtac cocukların alıcı ve ifade edici dil becerilerine
etkileri.,Ilkogretim Online, 13
(2), 622-639.
Berk, L.E. (2013). Bebekler ve cocuklar: Dogum oncesinden orta cocukluga (N. Isıkoglu Erdogan, cev.) Ankara: Nobel
Brock, A. & Rankin, C. (2008).Communication, Language and Literacy from Birth to Five. London: Sage
Bus, A.G., Van IJzendoorn, M.H., &Pellegrini, A.D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read. A meta-analysis on
in
tergenerational transmission of literacy.
Review of Educational Research 65, 1-21
Elmonayer, R.A. (2013). Promoting phonological awareness skills of Egyptian kindergarteners through dialogic reading. Ea
rly Child
Development and Care, 2013 Vol. 183, No. 9, 12291241
Gormley, S. & Ruhl, K. L. (2005) Dialogic Shared Storybook Reading: An Instructional Technique for Use with Young Students in Inclusive
S
ettings, Reading &Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 21:3, 307-313, DOI: 10.1080/10573560591007353
Hargrave, A. C.; Sénéchal, M. (2000). A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies: The bene
fits of
regular reading and dialogic reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15 (1), 2000, 75-90
Hresko, W.P., Reid, D.K., & Hammill, D.D. (1999). Examiner's manual: Test of Early Language Development, 3rd edition. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Hindman, A. H., Skibbe, L. E., & Foster, T. F. (2014). Exploring the nature of parental talk during shared book reading and its contributions to
p
reschool language and literacy: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal StudyBirth Cohort. R
eading & Writing: An
Interdisciplinary Journal, 2
7, 287-313.
LeRoux Dawn, K. (2013). Does parent implemented dıal
ogıc readıng strategıes increase vocabulary acquısıtıon in preschool aged chıldren?. A
Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Chico
Lever, R., & Sénéchal, M. (2011). Discussing stories: How a dialogic reading intervention improves kindergarteners’ oral narrati
ve construction.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 1-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.002
Lonigana Ch. J., Purpura D. J., Wilson, S. B., Walker, P. M., Menchetti, J. C. (2013). Evaluating the components of an emergent literacy
intervention for preschool children at risk for reading difficulties. J
ournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 111130
Lonigan, C. J., & Whitehurst, G. J. (1998). Relative efficacy of parent and teacher involvement in a shared-reading intervention for preschool
c
hildren from low-income back grounds. E
arly Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 263290.
Opel, A., Ameera, S. S., Aboud F. E. (2009) The effect of preschool dialogic reading on vocabulary among rural Bangladeshi children.
I
nternational Journal of Educational Research, 48
, (1), 1220
Powell, D. R., Diamond, K. E., Burchinal, M. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2010). Effects of an early literacy professional development in
tervention on
head start teachers and children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 299-312. doi: 10.1037/a0017763.
Sim, S., Berthelsen, D. (2014). Shared book reading by parents with young
children: evidence-based practice. Australasian Journal of Early
Childhood, 39 (1)
Sutton, M. M.,Sofka, A. E., Bojczyk, K. E., and Curenton, S. M. (2007). Assessing the Quality of Storybook Reading. (edt. Khara L.
P
ence)Assessment in Emergent Literacy, CA: Plural Publishing.
Topbas, S., Guven, S. (2010). TEDİL Turkce Erken Dil Gelisimi Testi, Detay Yayıncılık
Whitehurst, G. J., Arnold, D. S., Epstein, J. N., Angell, A. L., Smith, M., &Fischel, J. E. (1994). A Picture book reading inter
vention in day care
and home for children from low income families. D
evelopmental Psychology, 30, 679689.
Whitehurst, G. J.,Epstein, J. N., Angell, A. L., Payne, A. C., Crone, D. A., &Fischel, J. E. (1994). Outcome of an emergent literacy intervention
i
n Head Start. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 542555.
Whitehurst, G. J.,Falco, F., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M.C. & Caulfield, M. (1988). Accelerating
l
anguage development through picture-book reading. D
evelopmental Psychology, 24, 552-558.
Zevenbergen, A.A.,Whitehurst, G.J.,& Zevenbergen, J.A. (2003).Effects of a shared-reading intervention on the inclusion of evaluative devices
in narratives of children from low-income families. Ap
plied Developmental Psychology. 24, 115
... Shared storybook reading (SSBR) refers to the interactive process in which an adult reads a book with children and actively engages them in a discussion about the story. SSBR has been found to improve children's language development in several studies (Hargrave and Sénéchal, 2000;Gonzalez et al., 2014;Simsek and Erdogan, 2015). Furthermore, some recent studies have suggested that SSBR may be also effective in enhancing social-emotional development (Mendelsohn et al., 2018;Martin et al., 2022), especially if the story reading sessions involve age-appropriate discussions around the emotions and intentions of the story characters (Ornaghi et al., 2014(Ornaghi et al., , 2015Bergman Deitcher et al., 2021). ...
... Based on previous studies (Hargrave and Sénéchal, 2000;Gonzalez et al., 2014;Simsek and Erdogan, 2015), we also hypothesize that: ...
... As one of the hypotheses, we looked at the children's language development. Previous studies (Hargrave and Sénéchal, 2000;Gonzalez et al., 2014;Simsek and Erdogan, 2015) have suggested that SSBR support children's language development but results from both the first and second trials did not confirm this. As reading sessions are part of all the ECEC centers' curricula, the children in the control group attended regular reading sessions as well, and were probably similarly exposed to language and, e.g., new words as were the children in SAGA group. ...
Article
Full-text available
Social–emotional development is a key factor in child well-being and development, and studying how it can be supported in early childhood is crucial. This study acted as a second trial testing the efficacy of a shared story book reading intervention combined with mentalizing discussions (SAGA), on children’s (N = 196) social–emotional development. In contrast to the first trial, the current trial utilized a group comprised of mostly multilingual children, attending daycare in a minority language. In addition, we investigated the effect of the intervention on the mentalizing capacity of the staff. The staff of the early childhood education and care (ECEC) centers were trained to lead discussions about story characters’ mental states with children three times a week. The staff’s mentalization ability was measured by the self-reported Mentalization Scale (MentS). Children’s social–emotional development was evaluated via the teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire SDQ, and verbal fluency via a subtest from the NEPSY II neuropsychological test battery. After 12 weeks, the children in the SAGA group showed improvement in prosocial behavior, whereas no change was observed in the control group. Furthermore, within the SAGA group, the children showing initially lower scores for prosocial behavior displayed larger improvement compared to their peers with higher scores at baseline. No such intervention-based improvement emerged in verbal fluency. Unlike in the first trial, the intervention did not have an impact on children’s internalizing or externalizing problems. The results suggest that story reading sessions combined with mentalizing discussions about emotions, thoughts, and intentions of the story characters may support children’s social–emotional development within the realm of prosocial behavior, although the possibility to decrease children’s internalizing and externalizing problems with these sessions remains unclear based on the two trials. In addition, training the ECEC staff in mentalization theory and guiding them toward mind-related dialogs improved staff motivation to mentalize, as well as their child-related mentalization capacity.
... Dialogic reading has been shown to have numerous benefits for children's language skills, particularly in vocabulary and expressive language (Grolig et al., 2020;Lever & Sénéchal, 2011;Mol et al., 2008;Pillinger & Vardy, 2022;Rahn et al., 2016;Simsek & Erdogan, 2015). By promoting active participation and verbal expression during reading, dialogic reading has been found to be more beneficial than shared reading, which lacks this structure (Lever & Sénéchal, 2011;Whitehurst et al., 1999). ...
... By promoting active participation and verbal expression during reading, dialogic reading has been found to be more beneficial than shared reading, which lacks this structure (Lever & Sénéchal, 2011;Whitehurst et al., 1999). Studies have found that children who participate in dialogic reading perform better on language measures compared to those in control groups (Pillinger & Vardy, 2022;Simsek & Erdogan, 2015). Additionally, the benefits of dialogic reading have been demonstrated to be independent of whether it is parents or educators who implement this methodology, and they have been shown to transcend different socioeconomic levels (Zevenbergen & Whitehurst, 2003). ...
Article
Full-text available
Shared reading sessions utilizing dialogic reading methods have shown promise in supporting children’s language development and comprehension, though variability in implementation among practitioners remains a concern. This study analyzed 33 videotaped, one-on-one dialogic reading sessions implemented by 14 Chilean preservice early childhood educators and children aged 1 to 6. In total, 1289 sequences were examined for adherence to the PEER structure (prompt, evaluate, expand, and repeat), prompt type, and rate and length of children’s answer. Results showed that, on average, PSECEs executed sequences of 1.75 steps, with only 5% of all sequences reaching the final step. Furthermore, the study investigated the types of prompts employed by PSECEs. Notably, 69% of the prompts included questions, with wh-word-initiated questions comprising 46% of the total questions. Within this category, 16% were classified as high-challenge. Merely 7% of all prompts featured high-challenge questions. Children’s response rates were notably higher for prompts containing questions compared to other types of prompts, as well as for those containing wh-questions compared to other question types. Moreover, children’s answers were observed to be longer in response to prompts including high-challenge questions in contrast to other prompt types. Implications of these findings and future lines of research are discussed.
... Researchers have developed prompting guidance represented by the acronyms PEER (prompt, evaluate, expand, repeat; see Whitehurst et al., 1994) and CROWD (completion, recall, open-ended questions, wh-questions, distancing;see Zevenbergen & Whitehurst, 2003) to help adults learn about DR strategies. Following these strategies during shared reading, caregivers can promote social interactions with their children, sustain their attention, and enhance their verbal engagement with the text (Simsek & Erdogan, 2015). ...
... Empirical evidence suggests that DR has the strong potential to promote a wide range of language and literacy skills, including phonological awareness (Chow et al., 2010), receptive vocabulary (Simsek & Erdogan, 2015), expressive vocabulary (Mol et al., 2008;Rahn et al., 2016), word reading (Chow et al., 2010;Pillinger & Wood, 2014), character recognition (Chow et al., 2010), and comprehension (Dore et al., 2018). Specifically, the effect of DR in promoting vocabulary is particularly significant for younger children and those without risk of language impairments (Mol et al., 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
The study examined how children's self‐regulation skills measured by the strengths and weaknesses of ADHD symptoms and normal behavior rating are associated with story comprehension and how verbal engagement and e‐book discussion prompts moderate this relation. Children aged 3–7 ( N = 111, 50% female, Chinese as first language) read an interactive Chinese–English bilingual story e‐book with or without discussion prompts twice with their parents (2020–2021). Results demonstrated that the lower children's self‐regulation skills, the more they struggled with story comprehension. Critically, our data suggest that embedding e‐book discussion prompts and more verbalization in English can mitigate this negative association for children with inattention/hyperactivity. These findings have critical implications for future e‐book design, interventions, and home reading practice for children with inattention/hyperactivity and those at risk for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
... One hundred percent of caregivers in the current study also believed that reading stories to children helps them learn more words and talk more. As such, caregivers could benefit from implementing Dialogic Reading into their daily routines, which differs from traditional book reading by promoting interactive conversations between the reader and child and has been shown to significantly improve children's receptive and expressive languages (Simsek & Erdogan, 2015). ...
Article
The 30 million word gap refers to the disparity in early language exposure between low socioeconomic status (SES) children and their higher SES peers, a gap that is thought to negatively impact children's language development and future academic success. Although many early intervention approaches have proven effective in promoting language development among low SES children, they often fall short in terms of cultural responsiveness, which in turn affects caregiver buy-in. The purpose of the current study was to characterize the language beliefs and practices of caregivers in a region of the Deep South in the U.S., Louisiana, which is a racially diverse state characterized by high rates of poverty, with the goal of informing more strength-based interventions that build on caregiver beliefs and practices. Eighty-three care-givers completed a survey examining their priorities for child development, beliefs and practices surrounding language development , and greatest perceived barriers in supporting their child. Language development and problem-solving skills were the most important aspects of child development across all caregivers. Beliefs about how language develops, which context caregivers most frequently engage with their children, and whom children talk to most differed across racial and SES groups. Despite interventions aimed at modifying low SES caregivers' language input, these caregivers did not perceive their own language abilities to be a challenge in supporting their child's language development. The findings from this study highlight differences in beliefs and practices regarding child development among caregivers from racially and socioeconomically diverse backgrounds, which may in turn differentially impact caregiver buy-in of early interventions.
... Shared, interactive book reading provides opportunities for language modeling, exposure to novel vocabulary and sentence structure, and engagement between communication partners and children (Hargrave & Sénéchal, 2000;Mol et al., 2008;Noble et al., 2020;Simsek & Erdogan, 2015). The communication partner uses a series of scaffolds to promote language-based exchanges with the child. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Opportunities for literacy learning should be made accessible to all. For children with developmental disabilities who are emergent communicators, instruction in language and word reading may not be accessible through traditional practices. Method Within this clinical focus article, we propose a conceptual model—accessible literacy for emerging communicators (ALEC)—guided by universal design for learning (UDL). UDL provides guidance to make learning accessible by considering all students' needs for engagement, representation, and action and expression. The ALEC model leverages UDL to offer clinical guidance to identify and implement opportunities for language and word reading learning for emerging communicators using augmentative and alternative communication. For emerging communicators with developmental disabilities, applying UDL principles to literacy opportunities includes mapping literacy onto meaningful interactions, providing high-meaning and orthographic representations, and embedding literacy into augmentative and alternative communication technology. We explore this approach clinically, reporting on cases in which we used the approach with three young children on the autism spectrum. Results Based on clinical observation of data collection sessions in which UDL principles were applied to literacy, three participants demonstrated improved engagement compared with other sessions that targeted literacy goals. Conclusion More research is needed, but our initial exploration showed that, by applying UDL guidelines for access, literacy learning opportunities can be made accessible for children with developmental disabilities who are emerging communicators.
... Dialogic reading helps students demonstrate agency and foster self-management skills (Simsek & Erdogan, 2015). Students empower themselves by actively engaging in discussions, expressing their thoughts, and asking questions, taking ownership of their learning (Zucker et al., 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
There is value in integrating social–emotional learning with academic development as a way to support children's abilities to effectively communicate ideas, collaboratively solve problems, and strengthen early literacy practices. In this article, we discuss suggestions for using picturebook read-alouds as stepping stones for integrating social–emotional learning (SEL) competencies and core standards (ELA and SS) to address topics related to social justice, equity, and inclusion. We connect each SEL competency with a related topic for discussion and highlight lesson ideas for early grades to examine these themes, including potential prompts a teacher may use to foster curiosity and help students develop questions about each topic.
Article
Full-text available
Araştırmada, etkileşimli kitap okuma (EKO) sürecinin çocuk evleri sitesindeki çocukların erken okuryazarlık becerilerine ve bakım personellerinin çocuk edebiyatına yönelik tutumlarına olan etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada, deneysel desenlerden kontrol grupsuz ön test-son test yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubunu, Sivas Çocuk Evleri Sitesindeki 4-6 yaşları arasında 11 çocuk ve 13 bakım personeli oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama araçlarını “Çocuk Genel Bilgi Formu”, “Bakım Personeli Genel Bilgi Formu”, “Erken Okuryazarlık Becerilerini Değerlendirme Aracı” ve “Çocuk Edebiyatına Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği” oluşturmuştur. EKO etkinlikleri, sekiz hafta boyunca haftada üç gün araştırmacılar tarafından bakım personellerinin katılımlarıyla çocuklara uygulanmıştır. Grupların ön test-son test ve kalıcılık testi karşılaştırmalarında Friedman Testi, test sonucunda anlamlı farklılıklar oluşturan grupların saptanmasında Wilcoxon İşaretli Sıralar Testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, EKO etkinliklerinin çocukların ses bilgisel farkındalık becerilerinde, yazı farkındalıklarında, öyküyü anlama becerilerinde, görselleri eşleştirme becerilerinde, yazı yazma öncesi becerilerinde ve erken okuryazarlık becerilerinin toplamında anlamlı farklılıklara yol açtığı görülmüştür. EKO etkinliklerinin, çocukların bu becerilerini geliştirdiği saptanmıştır. Ayrıca EKO etkinliklerinin, bakım personellerinin çocuk edebiyatına yönelik tutumlarını olumlu yönde etkilediği görülmüştür. Bu noktada bakım personellerine EKO yaklaşımıyla ilgili eğitimlerin verilmesi, EKO’yla ilgili programların yaygınlaştırılması ve benzer çalışmaların farklı özelliklerdeki çocuklarla yürütülmesi önerilmiştir.
Article
Bu çalışma okul öncesi öğretmenlerninin hikâye okuma etkinliklerini nasıl gerçekleştirdiklerini, kendi uyguladıkları dil etkinliklerini nasıl değerlendirdiklerini ve bu etkinliklere katılan çocukların görüşlerini almak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 5 okul öncesi öğretmeni ve 60-72 aylık 15 okul öncesi dönem çocuğu oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcılar belirlenirken amaçlı kolay ulaşılabilir örneklemesi kullanılmıştır. Örneklemin tamamının aynı sosyo ekonomik düzeyden gelen aileler olamasına özen gösterilmiştir. Araştırmanın verilerinin toplanmasında görüşme ve gözlem teknikleri kullanılmıştır. İlk olarak okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin hikâye okuma etkinliklerini nasıl gerçekleştirdiğini belirlemek amacıyla bir hikâye etkinliğinde gözlem yapılmış, ardından öğretmenler ve çocuklarla görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Veriler gözlem formu ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu (öğretmen) ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu (çocuk) ile toplanmıştır. Gözlem ve görüşmeler kayıt altına alınmıştır. Öğretemen ve çocuklardan elde edilen veriler ayrı ayrı analiz edilip kodlanmış ve temalar oluşturulmuştur. Gözlem sonuçlarına göre öğretmenlerin hikâye öncesi, hikâye okuma ve hikâye sonrası etkinliklere yer verdikleri görülmüştür. Öğretmenlerden elde edilen görüşmeler neticesinde hazırlık, uygulama ve değerlendirme temaları oluşturulmuştur. Çocuklardan elde edilen görüşmeler sonucunda ise çocukların hikâye hakkındaki duyguları, en sevdiği kitap türleri, okuma sıklığı gibi temalar oluşturulmuş, verilen cevaplar bu temalar altında analiz edilmiş ve yorumlanmıştır.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the "Dialogic Book Reading Program (DBRP)" on the receptive and expressive language skills of 4-5- year-old children who were in need of protection. The study included nine children (4 girls and 5 boys) living in an orphanage and who were identified as developmentally delayed based on the results of Denver Developmental Screening Test II. Children's language skills were pre- and post tested. Results showed that DBRP was effective to improve expressive language skills (number of different words) of participating children. Findings were discussed based on the results of previous research.
Article
Full-text available
There is considerable recognition that shared book reading helps develop young children’s early reading and literacy skills. Home is an important context in which children first start to develop their early literacy skills. This paper reviews Australian and international literature of shared book-reading intervention pertaining to the effects of two different strategies (dialogic reading and print referencing) on young children’s early literacy skills. Further, a brief summary of findings of a recent Australian study are presented that showed some significant effects of shared reading on children’s early literacy skills. This research used a pragmatic RCT (randomised controlled trial) to investigate a combination of these two forms of shared bookreading home intervention with parents and their children enrolled in the Prep year of school in Queensland. The paper concludes with a discussion of the significance of the findings and implications for parents and teachers to use an evidence-based approach to help children develop early literacy skills.
Article
Full-text available
Although many studies have explored shared book reading between preschoolers and their families, very few have examined this practice within a large, nationally representative sample. Using the ECLS-B dataset, this study investigated shared reading among nearly 700 families of diverse ethnic, linguistic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Coding of families’ book-related discussion focused on the variety of types of talk that parents used during reading. Results showed that parents focused primarily on the meaning of the story, with little attention to the code of the text. The range of talk techniques that parents used was largely independent of background factors such as child gender, ethnicity, or age, as well as family home language. A wider variety of meaning-related remarks by parents was linked to more advanced language skills among preschoolers. Findings provide a portrait of the nature of shared book reading discussion among American families, a profile of the background factors that are linked to this talk, and a precise account of the unique contributions of this talk to key emergent language and literacy competencies.
Article
Full-text available
We experimentally assessed a 1-month, home-based intervention, designed to optimize parental reading of picture books to young children. Parents in the experimental group received instructions to increase their rates of open-ended questions, function/attribute questions, and expansions; to respond appropriately to children's attempts to answer these questions; and to decrease their frequency of straight reading and questions that could be answered by pointing. Control-group parents were instructed to read in their customary fashion. All families audiotaped their reading sessions at home. Analysis of these tapes demonstrated that the experimental group scored significantly higher than children in the control group on standardized posttests of expressive language ability. On the basis of analysis of audiotapes, children in the experimental group also had a higher mean length of utterance (MLU), a higher frequency of phrases, and a lower frequency of single words. Follow-up 9 months after the completion of treatment disclosed continued, although statistically diminished, differences between the two groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
The current review is a quantitative meta-analysis of the available empirical evidence related to parent-preschooler reading and several outcome measures. In selecting the studies to be included in this meta-analysis, we focused on studies examining the frequency of book reading to preschoolers. The results support the hypothesis that parent-preschooler reading is related to outcome measures such as language growth, emergent literacy, and reading achievement. The overall effect size of d = .59 indicates that book reading explains about 8% of the variance in the outcome measures. The results support the hypothesis that book reading, in particular, affects acquisition of the written language register. The effect of parent-preschooler reading is not dependent on the socioeconomic status of the families or on several methodological differences between the studies. However, the effect seems to become smaller as soon as children become conventional readers and are able to read on their own.
Article
Classrooms of 4-year-olds attending Head Start were randomly assigned to an intervention condition, involving an add-on emergent literacy curriculum, or a control condition, involving the regular Head Start curriculum. Children in the intervention condition experienced interactive book reading at home and in the classroom as well as a classroom-based sound and letter awareness program. Children were pretested and posttested on standardized tests of language, writing, linguistic awareness, and print concepts. Effects of the intervention were significant across all children in the domains of writing and print concepts. Effects on language were large but only for those children whose primary caregivers had been actively involved in the at-home component of the program. One linguistic awareness subtest, involving the ability to identify the first letter and first sound of words, showed significant effects.
Article
The effects of an interactive shared-reading intervention were evaluated with 3-to 4-year-old children from low-income families who attended subsidized child care. The children entered the program with oral language skills that were significantly below age-level as measured by standardized tests. Children were pretested and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions: (a) no treatment control, (b) a school condition in which children were read to by their teachers in small groups, (c) a home condition in which children were read to by their parents, and (d) a combined school plus home condition. Parents and teachers were trained in a specific form of interactive reading via an instructional videotape. The intervention was conducted for 6 weeks, after which children were posttested on standardized measures of oral language, and language samples were obtained during a shared-reading assessment. Significant effects of the reading intervention were obtained at posttest and were largest for children in conditions involving home reading.
Article
The present study examines the effect of dialogic reading (DR) on the promotion of Arabic phonological awareness skills (including syllable awareness, rhyme awareness, and phoneme awareness) of Egyptian kindergarteners. The participants were 67 children enrolled in the second level of kindergarten (ages 5–6), assigned to an experimental group (n = 35) or a control group (n = 32). Kindergarten Inventory of Phonological Awareness was developed by the author in the light of relevant previous studies. Pre-tests and post-tests were administered to the participants in the two groups. In between the two tests, the experimental group engaged in DR activities designed to improve their phonological awareness skills, using an alphabet storybook, designed and developed by the author, presented to the whole class via PowerPoint, while the control group participated in regular classroom activities. The findings suggest that children in the experimental group had higher phonological awareness levels in the post-tests than those in the control group. The specific design of the DR activities may be responsible for these changes.