ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Emerging nanotechnology presents great potential to change human society. Nanoscale devices are able to be included with Internet. This new communication paradigm, referred to as Internet of Nanothings (IoNT), demands very short-range connections among nanoscale devices. IoNT raises many challenges to realize it. Current network protocols and techniques may not be directly applied to communicate with nanosensors. Due to the very limited capability of nanodevices, the devices must have simple communication and simple medium sharing mechanism in order to collect the data effectively from nanosensors. Moreover, nanosensors may be deployed at organs of the human body, and they may produce large data. In this process, the data transmission from nanosensors to gateway should be controlled from the energy efficiency point of view. In this paper, we propose a wireless nanosensor network (WNSN) at the nanoscale that would be useful for intrabody disease detection. The proposed conceptual network model is based on On-Off Keying (OOK) protocol and TDMA framework. The model assumes hexagonal cell-based nanosensors deployed in cylindrical shape 3D hexagonal pole. We also present in this paper the analysis of the data transmission efficiency, for the various combinations of transmission methods, exploiting hybrid, direct, and multi-hop methods.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Research Article
Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for
Intrabody Application
Suk Jin Lee,1Changyong (Andrew) Jung,2Kyusun Choi,3and Sungun Kim4
1Texas A&M University-Texarkana, Texarkana, TX 75503, USA
2Framingham State University, Framingham, MA 01701, USA
3Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
4Pukyong National University, Busan 608-737, Republic of Korea
Correspondence should be addressed to Sungun Kim; kimsu@pknu.ac.kr
Received  March ; Accepted June 
Academic Editor: Luis Orozco-Barbosa
Copyright ©  Suk Jin Lee et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Emerging nanotechnology presents great potential tochange human society. Nanoscale devices are able to be included with Internet.
is new communication paradigm, referred to as Internet of Nanothings (IoNT), demands very short-range connections among
nanoscale devices. IoNT raises many challenges to realize it. Current network protocols and techniques may not be directly applied
to communicate with nanosensors. Due to the very limited capability of nanodevices, the devices must have simple communication
and simple medium sharing mechanism in order to collect the data eectively from nanosensors. Moreover, nanosensors may be
deployed at organs of the human body, and they may produce large data. In this process, the data transmission from nanosensors
to gateway should be controlled from the energy eciency point of view. In this paper, we propose a wireless nanosensor network
(WNSN) at the nanoscale that would be useful for intrabody disease detection. e proposed conceptual network model is based
on On-O Keying (OOK) protocol and TDMA framework. e model assumes hexagonal cell-based nanosensors deployed in
cylindrical shape D hexagonal pole. We also present in this paper the analysis of the data transmission eciency, for the various
combinations of transmission methods, exploiting hybrid, direct, and multi-hop methods.
1. Introduction
Nanoscale devices require a new communication paradigm;
they perform simple tasks, share the collected data, and reach
unprecedented number of locations over the Internet. is
new network paradigm is called IoNT []. In the IoNT, the
new network architecture was proposed to accommodate
two potential applications: interconnect nanoscale devices
and interconnect oces. Our research work is focused on
the intrabody communications for healthcare providers to
develop the network system architecture for realizing IoNT
applications. Human body is made up of almost organs.
Here, the nanosensors may be implanted into the organs,
detecting specic symptom or virus and forwarding the
sensing data to the nanorouter. e nanorouter may collect
data from the nanosensors. e nanorouter then may send
the collected data to the outside of the body.
e intrabody wireless communications encounter some
diculties that do not appear in regular propagation condi-
tions because the human body has a lot of water. Firstly, in-
body path loss model for homogeneous human tissues was
investigated as a function of various parameters at . GHz
range []. In addition, it is also discussed that the terahertz
(THz) band can be the potential solution to operate the
future electromagnetic (EM) nanosensors []. Moreover, the
related studies reveal that the path loss in human tissues at
very short distances (several millimeters) is not signicant
to deal well with communications among nanosensors at
THz frequency range [,]. Recently, the numerical analysis
of EM wave propagation in the human body explains that
using of EM paradigm is favorable compared with the
molecular communication channel because the molecular
channel attenuation is considerably higher than the situation
usingTHzEMmechanismintermsofthepathlossversus
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
Volume 2015, Article ID 176761, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/176761
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
distance []. On the other hand, the nanosensor, equipped
with graphene-based nanopatch antennas, is envisaged to
allow the implementation of nano-EM communications [].
Nanonetworking is an emerging eld, communicating
among nanomachines and expanding the capability of a
single nanomachine. Moreover, WNSN at the nanoscale
may be useful for intrabody disease detection. For instance,
nanosensors deployed in WNSN, equipped with graphene-
based nanopatch antennas [], can detect symptoms or virus
by means of molecules []orbacteriabehaviors[]. In fact,
the large surface area and the excellent electrical conductivity
of graphene allow rapid electron transfer that facilitates
accurate and selective detection of biomolecules. According
to Kuila et al., the advancement of graphene-based biosensors
allows the application of graphene for the detection of glu-
cose, Cyt-c (Cytochrome-c), NADH (Nicotinamide Adenine
Dinucleotide Hydride), Hb (Hemoglobin), cholesterol, AA
(Amino Acid), UA (Uric Acid), and DA (Diamino Acid) [].
In general, nanosensors have the very limited amount
of energy in their batteries and it is not easy to replace
or recharge them. When the energy harvesting systems are
assumed in IoNT applications, the energy resources of nano-
sensors might be retained over time. at is because the nano-
scale power generator could convert mechanical movement,
vibrational movement, or hydraulic energy into the electrical
energy []. However, they are not easy to implement.
erefore, the data transmission method plays an important
role in the optimization of the energy consumption []. In
addition, the data transmission is one of the important factors
for realizing ecient IoNT applications due to large data
produced from nanosensors [].
For example, Pierobon et al. proposed a routing and
data transmission framework to optimize the use of har-
vested energy with multi-hop decision algorithm []. In this
approach, the nanorouter makes decision for a nanosensor
to transmit the sensing data using direct or multi-hop
transmission, based on the estimated distance between the
nanorouter and the nanosensor []. is framework follows
a typical Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) scheduling
using DownLink (DL), UpLink (UL), Multi-Hop (MH),
and RandomAccess (RA). However, due to the very limited
capability of nanodevices, the devices must have simple
communication and simple medium sharing mechanism. For
this reason, our research work is based on OOK protocol
and TDMA-based framework for the ecient data collection
[,].
Furthermore, for the various combinations of transmis-
sion methods, we also study the analysis of the data trans-
mission eciency for choosing the best one adapting to the
suggested network model. Here, note that we produce an
energy dissipation model based on the path loss model of
Jornet and Akyildiz [,] and also analyze the commu-
nication from single-hop as well as multi-hop. In fact, []
revealed that the energy aware routing framework with the
combination of direct and multi-hop transmission methods
can prolong the network life time.
is paper deals with the design of a WNSN at the nano-
scale to be used for intrabody disease detection as an appli-
cation of the IoNT. e suggested model assumes hexagonal
cell-based nanosensors deployed in cylindrical shape D
hexagonal pole. Here, a hexagonal cell model represents each
cell which is the smallest living unit of organs. Note that the
proposed model assumes hexagonal cell-based nanosensors
because the nanopatch antennas are graphene-based in a
honeycomb crystal lattice.
For designing this model, at rst, we explain the network
architecture for the proposed IoNT application model and
describe the corresponding cylindrical body model using
D hexagonal pole. Second, for the supposed organ of the
human body, we present the derivation of the ideal number
of hexagonal cells and the edge length in proportion to the
needed annulus number horizontally; and then we describe
a comparative analysis of the energy eciency, in the process
of data transmission, showing that the selection of the data
transmission method plays an important role in the optimiza-
tion of energy consumption. Such a comparative analysis is
done for the various combinations of data transmission meth-
ods exploiting the hybrid, direct, and multi-hop methods.
In the following section, we explain the physical and
MAC layers concepts for our proposed WNSN model for
the supposed IoNT application. Accordingly, the nanosensor
deployment model and the energy consumption scheme are
described in Section .InSection ,wepresentthemod-
elling of the various combinations of transmission methods
and suggest their energy dissipation equations. Section
describes the conceptual design of a WNSN for intrabody
application and shows simulation results and comparative
analysis of the data transmission eciency, followed by
conclusion and future works in Section .
2. Preliminary
2.1. Physical and MAC Layer Protocol Peculiarities of
Nanosensors in the Proposed WNSN Model. e nanosensors,
equipped with graphene-based nanopatch antennas, are
envisaged to allow the implementation of nano-EM com-
munications []. EM communication waves propagating in
graphene-based antenna have a lower propagation speed than
those in metallic antenna. Nevertheless, Gbps channel capac-
ity is available by radiating EM waves in THz frequency range.
However, our suggested model for intrabody application does
not probably need such a high channel capacity. Moreover, if
we assume that each nanosensor widely dispersed in the body
has just a role to catch disease symptoms anyhow, we need
to have a simple OOK protocol to communicate between
nanorouter and each nanosensor. Here, OOK protocol
can use femtosecond pulse-based modulations in which the
transmitted pulse lies in THz, called IR-UWB, Impulse Radio
Ultra Wide Band [,]. For example, the symbol “” is sent
by using a one hundred-femtosecond-long pulse as detection
of disease symptom and the symbol “” as nondetection of
disease symptom; that is, the nanosensor remains silent. In
this process, we adopt a scheduling scheme based on TDMA
for the synchronization among nanosensors and nanorouter.
In fact, employing this scheme may lead us to need
simple MAC protocol to avoid collisions in simultaneous
transmissions. More details about the behavior of physical
and data link layer protocols are out of the scope of this paper.
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
Nanolink
Nano-microinterface
Gateway
Nanosensors
Nanorouter Microlink
App. provider
Internet
F : Network architecture for the proposed IoNT application
model.
Anyway, Jornet et al. showed that time spread OOK pro-
tocol generates a very short pulse in femtosecond long [],
which has its main frequency components in the THz band.
And that is already being used in several applications such as
nanoscale spectroscopy and biological imaging [].
2.2. Network Architecture for IoNT Applications. Figure
depicts simple network architecture of WNSN to be used
for intrabody disease detection as an application of the
IoNT []. e network can be composed of nanosensors,
nanorouters, nano-microinterface and gateway regardless of
any specic application. Here nanosensor is implanted into
the organs detecting symptoms or virus, performing com-
putation with a limited memory and transmitting small data
over a short range, whereas nanorouters are relatively larger
computational resources than nanosensors. ey aggregate
data from nanomachines (nanosensors). Aer nanosensors
detect specic symptoms or virus, simple data (e.g., for
detection or for nondetection) to inform the existence
of symptoms or virus will be forwarded to the nano-
microinterface through nanorouters. Here, the gateway (i.e.,
microscale device) makes it possible to remotely control the
entire system over the Internet.
In this paper, we assume that the nanosensors are able
to detect specic symptoms or virus by means of signal
molecules [] or bacteria behaviors []. Each cell in this case
is modeled as a hexagonal shaped cell, therefore giving a D
structure for the nanosensor networks. Actually the hexa-
gonal shaped cell model is a very similar structure with the
graphene in a honeycomb crystal lattice. Here, the accu-
mulated unit layers (where the unit layer consists of unit cells)
construct a -dimensional space for the individual target
organ, for example, heart, lungs, and kidney.
3. Nanosensor Deployment and Energy
Consumption Models for the Nanonetworks
3.1. Wireless Nanosensor Network Model. e nanosensors
can be deployed arbitrarily at organs of the human body
andtheymaybemovedbybodyuid.Weassumethatthe
nanosensors are distributed in -dimensional space in the
nanonetworks according to a homogeneous spatial Poisson
process. Most of the human organs such as spleen, liver,
lung, and heart are not shaped as perpendicular structure;
rather they are closer to round shape. Geometrically, we
represent the organ specic targeting area of the human body
ascylindricalshapeDhexagonalpole,whichisclosertothe
shape of organs. Here, each hexagonal shaped cell represents
each cell which is the smallest living unit of organs. us,
in the cylindrical model, as given in Figure ,wecanputas
many nanosensors as possible and each hexagonal cell has
oneactivenanosensor.Noticethatthecustomizedmodeling
isoutofscopeinthispaper.
Let us dene the nanonetwork depth () as the height of
the D hexagonal pole. Nanosensors within each layer con-
struct a cluster, where the information sensed by each nano-
sensor is transmitted to the nano-microinterface through the
nanorouter of each cluster. Aer each nanosensor sent out
the broadcasting message in a hexagonal cell, we assume
that all the nanosensors may recognize other neighboring
nanosensors. Each hexagonal cell may have more than one
nanosensor. However, only one nanosensor that has stronger
energy than others may be selected as the active nanosensor.
e other nanosensors that were not selected as the active
nanosensor will fall into the sleep mode, referred to as sleep
nanosensors. ose sleeping nanosensors are used for the
next data transmission process so that the load of the energy
consumption can be evenly distributed in nanonetworks.
For the target organ, as shown in Figure ,theedgelength
of hexagon is derived from the network radius .Once
we choose the network radius that may be relevant to
the volume of the target organ, the relationship between the
nanonetwork width and the edge length of hexagon can
be visualized by the equations, as shown in Figure (i.e.,
is an even or odd case). Notice that the number of hexagonal
cells for the individual annulus 𝑤is 6(=1,2,...,),
where is set for 0.
Let us dene 𝑖as the nanosensor density []ofth
hexagonal cell; 𝑖 {0,1,2,3,...}.Aerwegettherela-
tionship between the number of cells in the farthest annulus
𝑊and the edge length of hexagon ,wecanmaximize
the number of each hexagonal cell by minimizing the
nanosensor density. is process allows each hexagonal cell
to have a small number of nanosensors as possible. We can
show this process by the following expression:
=arg min
𝑋3𝑊(𝑊+1)+1
𝑖=1
1
𝑖
s.t.
𝑖=0,()
where the hexagonal cells with no nanosensor (𝑖=0)were
excluded. Aer choosing , we can notice that the number
of hexagonal cells that have only one nanosensor can be
maximized. Our assumption is that only one nanosensor is
active and the others go to sleep for the next iteration.
3.2. Energy Consumption Model for Our Wireless Nanosensor
Network. Jornet and Akyildiz introduced a novel propaga-
tion model for future EM nanonetworks in the THz band.
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
Relation Rand S:S = 2R/(3w + 1)2+3
Active nanosensor
Nanorouter
Sleep nanosensor
Nano-microinterface
S
S
R
reshold range (annulus t)
Layer threshold (layer l)
Event
Multi-hop transmission
Direct transmission
Multi-hop transmission (in layer)
Hybrid transmission (in layer)
Direct transmission (in layer)
Multi-hop transmission (between layers)
Direct transmission
Hybrid transmission (between layers)
(if w is even)
Gateway
Nanonetwork depth (H)
Network radius (R)
S
S
Nanonetwork width (W)
Relation Rand S:S = 2R/(3w + 1) (if wis odd)
A1Aw
Annulus A1
(between layers)
Farthest annulus AW
A1
Aw
···
···
AW
AW
F : Cylindrical shape D hexagonal pole.
THz path loss model of nanonetworks is obtained by using
the sum in dB of the spreading loss, spread,andthemolecular
absorption loss, abs,asfollows[,]:
,=spread ,+abs ,
=40
2
exp , ()
where is the wave frequency, is the total path length,
is the speed of light in the vacuum, 0is the designed center
frequency, and ()is the molecular absorption coecient.
e transmission power, (),consumedinthetransmitter
nanosensor, should make sure that a constant signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) in the receiver nanosensor located at the distance
. is is dened as follows []:
()=SNR ,0, ()
where 0is the total molecular absorption noise power
spectral density. We assume that 0is a constant value [].
e maximum transmission capacity of the THz band, as a
function of distance ,canbecalculatedasfollows[]:
()=3dB ()log2(1+SNR),()
where 3dB is the dB bandwidth. Let us dene 𝑡(,)as
the transmitter energy dissipation to transmit -bits packet
located at the distance . Accordingly, the transmitter energy
dissipation 𝑡(,)can be expressed as follows:
𝑡(,)=()
()×=40
20SNR
log2(1+SNR)2. ()
In (), we assume that the molecular absorption does
not aect the frequency range dened by the dB band-
width, 3dB();thatis,() 0.In[], generally, in
the simple radio energy dissipation model, they introduced
that the transmitter energy consumption is depending on
the electronic energy and the amplier energy, whereas the
receiver energy consumption is only relevant to the electronic
energy []. erefore, we can dene 𝑟(,)as the receiver
energy dissipation to receive -bits packet and the value of
𝑟(,) is intrinsically less than 𝑡(,).Inourmodel,we
assume that the value of 𝑟(,) is pertaining to the value
of 𝑡(,). Accordingly, we can derive the receiver energy
dissipation () by substituting the constant unit distance 0
for the transmission distance factor as follows:
𝑟,0=×𝑡,0, ()
where is the transceiver energy dissipation ratio with the
condition; that is, <1. For the notation simplicity, we use
the receiver energy dissipation 𝑟()instead of 𝑟(,0).
4. Combination of Data Transmission Methods
and Energy Dissipation
4.1. Data Transmission Methods within Layer and between
Layers. In this section, we introduce data transmission meth-
ods to collect the data sensed from the nanosensors. Within
each layer, as shown in Figure , all the information detected
at the nanosensors (actually we assume that this information
contains the geographical location of the nanosensor that
sentthesymbol“)istransmittedtothenanorouterinits
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
corresponding layer. Note that each nanorouter is located at
the center cell (annulus 0) of each layer and also served as
an active nanosensor at the same time. On the other hand,
between layers, all the collected data at the nanorouter of
each layer are sent to layer ’s nanorouter that forwards the
collected data to the nano-microinterface to communicate
with microscale devices, that is, gateway.
First, within each layer, three data transmission meth-
ods are possible horizontally, as described in Figure .In
the direct data transmission, every nanosensor sends the
sensing data directly to its corresponding nanorouter with
achieving high transmission eciency []. Meanwhile, in
the multi-hop transmission, an adjacent (immediate neigh-
bor) nanosensor one annulus nearer to the corresponding
nanorouter is randomly selected; and then each nanosensor
which detects symptoms or virus sends the data to the cho-
sen adjacent nanosensor until arriving at its corresponding
nanorouter in the way of annulus by annulus hierarchically.
On the other hand, the hybrid data transmission is achieved
by combining the multi-hop and direct transmission meth-
ods. For example, let us dene as the threshold range and
as a certain annulus number in the given layer. en,
within the threshold range, (≤), every nanosensor
sends the data directly to the nanorouter of its corresponding
laye r. However, for nan osensors loc ated outside annulus ,
that is, >, each one sends out the data to the adjacent
(immediate neighbor) active nanosensor one annulus nearer
to its nanorouter using the multi-hop transmission.
Second, between layers, three data transmission methods
arealsofeasibleasshowninFigure .Inthehybridapproach,
the collected data in each layer’s router should be forwarded
to the next immediate router using the multi-hop or direct
transmission, where the transmission method is chosen by
the threshold layer . Let us dene as a certain layer of
nanonetworks. If layer is less than or equal to the threshold
layer ; the nanorouter directly sends the collected data to
layer ’s nanorouter; otherwise, the other nanorouters trans-
mit the data to the next upper layer’s nanorouter until arriving
at the nanorouter of the threshold layer using multi-hop
transmission. On the other hand, the multi-hop transmission
is accomplished by sending the collected data from the far-
thest nanorouter of layer to the adjacent router (immediate
neighbor router) until arriving at layer ’s nanorouter in the
way of layer by layer hierarchically, as given in Figure .On
the contrary, the direct data transmission can be achieved by
sending the data collected at each layer’s nanorouter directly
to layer ’s nanorouter as explained in Figure .
4.2. Selection of Energy Ecient Data Transmission Method.
Employing the data transmission methods within layer and
between layers, explained in the previous section, we can
select the most eective combination of data transmission
methods in the way of energy eciency. For the overall
collection process, individual nanosensor creates a cluster
for each layer, as shown in Figure . Each layer can select
the nanorouter in its corresponding layer. Here, note that
wexedthelocationofeachrouteratthecentercell
(annulus 0) in each layer. Aer detecting symptoms or
virus for the specic application, all nanosensors transmit the
Designing of the best tted cylindrical model using 3D hexagonal pole
for the target organ of the body
Selection of the most appropriated nanorouter with respect to
the data transmission methods within each layer
Applying of each combination of data transmission methods within
Applying of each combination of data transmission methods
Selection of the most energy ecient combination of data
transmission methods
each layer
between layers
F : Selection of the energy ecient data transmission
method.
geographical location data to their nanorouters using data
transmission methods within layer, that is, hybrid method
(H), multi-hop method (M), or direct method (D). Aer
receiving the data from nanosensors, each router sends out
the collected data to layer ’s router using data transmission
methods between layers, that is, H, M, or D methods. Figure
summarizes the overall collection process.
Table summarizes the possible combinations of data
transmission methods. With applying one of combinations of
data transmission methods listed in Tab l e to the algorithm
given in Figure ,wecanndoutthemostenergyecient
combination. We dene this process denoted by
COMB
=min
𝐻
Router=0Horizontal
Sensor +Horizontal
Router +Ver t ic a l
Router , ()
where COMB is one of combinations of data transmission
methods minimizing the total energy dissipation of data
transmission. Router is the total energy dissipation of the
nanorouter in each layer and Sensor is the total energy
dissipation of nanosensors in each layer, respectively; and
means the depth of network. erefore, the main objective
is to nd out the most ecient combination of data trans-
mission methods which has the least total energy dissipation
Tot a l (i.e., COMB) in the given cylindrical model designed
for intrabody application.
4.3. Energy Dissipation of Each Combination of Data Trans-
mission Methods. In order to calculate Tot al (the total energy
dissipation of the nanorouter and nanosensors for each com-
bination), we need to derive Hor
mul (the multi-hop transmis-
sion range) and Hor
dir(𝑤) (the direct transmission range)
within layer horizontally, as given in the equations in
Figure (a). Respectively, between layers, we also need
Ver t
mul (the multi-hop transmission range) and Ver t
dir(ℎ) (the
direct transmission range) vertically, as derived in the equa-
tions in Figure (b).Figure shows the ranges for the multi-
hop and direct transmissions utilized for each combination.
In this paper, we assume that one sensor in each cell
transmits its location information in case of detecting a cer-
tain symptom or virus for the specic application. For all
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
T : Possible combinations of data transmission methods.
Within layer Between layers
Hybrid Multi-hop Direct
Hybrid Hybrid-Hybrid (H-H) Hybrid-Multi (H-M) Hybrid-Direct (H-D)
Multi-hop Multi-Hybrid (M-H) Multi-Multi (M-M) Multi-Direct (M-D)
Direct Direct-Hybrid (D-H) Direct-Multi (D-M) Direct-Direct (D-D)
S
S
S
S
S
Cell in which nanorouter located
Network radius (R)
reshold range
Farthest annulus (W)
Cell in tier w+1
···
Cell in tier w
rHor
mul ≤S
14 rHor
dir(w) ≤S
3(w + 1)2+2
Cell in tier w
(annulus t)
(a) Within layer (horizontally)
Multi-hop transmission range:
Active nanosensor
Nanocontroller Direct transmission
Multi-hop transmission
Direct transmission range:
reshold layer
rVer t mul ≤S
14 rVer t dir(h)≤S
3(h + 1)2+2
(h l)
Layer h1
(h l)
Layer h
Layer 0
Layer l
Layer H
S
S
.
.
.
.
.
.
S
.
.
.
>
(b) Between layers (vertically)
F : Description of ranges for transmission methods.
possible combinations of data transmission methods, the
energy dissipation equations are constructed as given in
Table .
Horizontally, using () and (),Hor
mul and Hor
dir(𝑤) in
case of applying the hybrid method in each layer, the trans-
mission energy dissipation of nanosensors can be written as
Horizontal(Hy brid )
Sensor =6×𝑡,Hor
mul, if =,
Horizontal(Hy brid )
Sensor
=𝑟()×𝑊−𝑡1
𝑛=1[3(−2−1)]
+𝑡,Hor
mul
×𝑊−𝑡−1
𝑛=1−32+−22,
if <<,
Horizontal(Hy brid )
Sensor
=𝑟()×𝑊−𝑡
𝑛=1[6(−+1)]+𝑡,Hor
dir(𝑡)
×𝑊−𝑡+1
𝑛=1[6(−+1)],if =,
Horizontal(Hy brid )
Sensor =𝑡−1
𝑤=16×𝑡,Hor
dir(𝑤),
otherwise.()
In (),Horizontal(Hy brid )
Sensor total is the total energy dissipation
of nanosensors for each layer when the hybrid transmission
method is applied horizontally. Consider
Horizontal(Hy brid )
Sensor total =6×𝑡,Hor
mul+𝑟()
×𝑊−𝑡−1
𝑛=1[3(−2−1)]+𝑡,Hor
mul
×𝑊−𝑡−1
𝑛=1−32+−22+𝑟()
×𝑊−𝑡
𝑛=1[6(−+1)]+𝑡,Hor
dir(𝑡)
×𝑊−𝑡+1
𝑛=1[6(−+1)]
+𝑡−1
𝑤=16×𝑡,Hor
dir(𝑤).
()
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
T : Energy dissipation of the possible combination of data transmission methods.
Methods To t a l e n e r g y d i s s ip a t io n
H-H (H,H)=Hor izontal(Hy bri d)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Hybri d)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
M-M (M,M)=Hor izontal (Multi-hop)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Multi-hop)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
D-D (D,D)=Hor izontal(Direct)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Direct)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
H-D (H,D)=Hor izontal(Hy bri d)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Direct)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
H-M (H,M)=Hor izontal(Hy bri d)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Multi-hop)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
M-H (M,H)=Hor izontal(Mu lti-hop)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Hybri d)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
M-D (M,D)=Hor izontal(Mu lti-hop)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Direct)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
D-H (D,H)=Hor izontal(Direct)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Hybri d)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
D-M (D,M)=Hor izontal(Direct)
Sensor total +Horizontal
Router +Vert i ca l (Multi-hop)
Router total +Vert i ca l
Router
On the other hand, applying () and () and Hor
mul in the
case of the multi-hop transmission method, we derive the
following equation for the transmission energy dissipation of
nanosensors (Horizont al(Multi-hop)
Sensor ) dened by
Horizontal(Multi-hop)
Sensor =6×𝑡,Hor
mul,
if =,
Horizontal(Multi-hop)
Sensor
=𝑟()×𝑊−1
𝑛=1[3(−2−1)]+𝑡,Hor
mul
×𝑊−1
𝑛=1−32+−22,
if 0 ≤<.
()
In (),Horizontal(Multi-hop)
Sensor total is the total energy dissipation
of nanosensors for each layer when the multi-hop transmis-
sion method is applied horizontally. Consider
Horizontal(Multi-hop)
Sensor total
=6×𝑡,Hor
mul+𝑟()
×𝑊−1
𝑛=1 [−3(−2−1)]+𝑡,Hor
mul
×𝑊−1
𝑛=1 −32+−2−2.
()
And then, applying () and () and Hor
dir(𝑤) for the direct
transmission method, we can dene the transmission energy
dissipation of nanosensors (Horizontal(Direct)
Sensor )writtenas
EHorizontal(Direct)
Sensor total =𝑊
𝑤=1 6×𝑡,Hor
dir(𝑤),
1≤≤. ()
On the other hand, () means the total receiving energy
dissipation for the nanorouter in the center cell of each layer
denoted by
Horizontal
Router =(+1)×𝑊
𝑤=1 6×𝑟(),
0l≤. ()
Vertically,wealsorepresenttheenergydissipationof
nanorouters in a similar way. First of all, using () and (),
Ver t
mul,andVer t
dir(ℎ) in case of applying the hybrid trans-
mission method, the equations for the transmission energy
dissipations of nanorouters (Horizont al(Hy brid )
Router )canbewritten
as
=𝑊
𝑤=1(6)+1,
Ver t i cal (hybrid)
Router =×𝑡,Ver t
mul, if =,
Ver t i cal (hybrid)
Router =𝑟()×𝐻−𝑙−1
𝑛=1 (×)
+𝑡,Ve r t
mul
×𝐻−𝑙−1
𝑛=1 [(+1)×],
if <<,
Ver t i cal (hybrid)
Router =(−)××𝑟()+(−+1)
××𝑡,Ve r t
dir(𝑙), if =,
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
Ver t i cal (hybrid)
Router =𝑙−1
ℎ=1×𝑡,Ve rt
dir(ℎ),
otherwise.()
In (),Horizontal(Hy brid )
Router total refers to the total energy dissipa-
tion of nanorouters when the hybrid transmission method is
applied vertically. Consider
=𝑊
𝑤=1 (6)+1,
Ver t i cal (Hybrid)
Router total =×𝑡,Vert
mul+𝑟()
×𝐻−𝑙−1
𝑛=1 (×)
+𝑡,Ve r t
mul
×𝐻−𝑙−1
𝑛=1 [(+1)×]
+(−)××𝑟()
+(−+1)×
×𝑡,Ve r t
dir(𝑙)
+𝑙−1
ℎ=1×𝑡,Ve rt
dir(ℎ).
()
On the other hand, using () and () and Ver t
mul in the
case of the multi-hop transmission method, we derive the
transmission energy dissipation Ver t ic a l (Multi -hop )
Router of the nano-
routers given by
=𝑊
𝑤=1(6)+1,
Ver t i cal (Mult i-hop)
Router =×𝑡,Ver t
mul, if =,
Ver t i cal (Mult i-hop)
Router =𝑟()×𝐻−1
𝑛=1(×)
+𝑡,Ve r t
mul
×𝐻−1
𝑛=1[(+1)×],
if 0 ≤<.
()
In (),Ver t i ca l (Mult i-ho p)
Router total means the total energy dis-
sipation of nanorouters when the multi-hop transmission
method is adapted vertically. Consider
=𝑊
𝑤=1(6)+1,
Ver t i cal (Mult i-hop)
Router total =×𝑡,Vert
mul+𝑟()
×𝐻−1
𝑛=1 (×)
+𝑡,Ve r t
mul
×𝐻−1
𝑛=1 [(+1)×].
()
And then, applying () and () and Ve rt
dir(ℎ) to the
direct transmission method, () for the transmission energy
dissipation of the nanorouters (Vert i c al (Direct)
Sensor )canbewritten
as
=𝑊
𝑤=1(6)+1,
Ver t i cal (Direct)
Router total =𝐻
ℎ=1×𝑡,Ver
dir(ℎ),
1≤≤.
()
Meanwhile, the following equation contains the total
receiving energy dissipation for layer ’s nanorouter
which forwards the collected information to the nano-
microinterface given by
=𝑊
𝑤=1(6)+1,
Ver t i cal
Router =××𝑟().
()
Conclusively, utilizing all equations, that is, ()-() and from
() through (), we can nd the most ecient combination
of data transmission methods which has the least total energy
dissipation Tot al (i.e., COMB) in the given cylindrical model
designed. According to our simulation results, we experi-
enced that the combination of hybrid data transmissions
(within layer and between layers) (H-H) outperforms other
combinations like H-M, H-D, M-H, M-M, M-D, D-H, D-M,
and D-D.
5. Design and Analysis of Simulation Results
5.1. Design of Nanosensors Deployment Network Model. e
humanbodyismadeupofalmostorgans;theirsizeand
weight are unpredictable according to body length, body
weight, and body mass index []. For network modeling, we
assume the target organ as cylindrical shape D hexagonal
pole. Let us design a cylinder model for the supposed organ
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
T : Number of hexagonal cells and edge length in proportion to the required annulus number.
Farthest annulus number      
Edge length of hexagon (mm) . . . . . .
Total number of hexagonal cells 
T : Total number of layers and maximum height of network with variable edge length .
Edge length of hexagon (mm) . . . . . .
Total number of layers      
Maximum height of network (mm) . . . . . .
of the body ( cm in diameter and cm in height). e edge
length of hexagon can be derived by applying the relation ,
as given in Figure .Table shows and the total number of
hexagonal cells (in the layer) in proportion to the annulus
number .InTa bl e ,wecannoticethatincreases as
decreases.
In addition, the total number of layers can be decided
by using .Ta b l e shows and the maximum height of
networkapproximatedtocminheight.
5.2. Calculation of the Horizontal reshold Range .For the
case of the H-H combination described in Section .,this
section explains how to calculate the horizontal threshold
range . e total horizontal transmission energy dissipation
of nanosensors is given in ().Inordertondoutfor the
target annulus number in Tab l e , we divide the total hori-
zontal transmission energy dissipation (Horizontal (Hybrid)
Sensor total)
by the total area (2) in the direct transmission range. For
example, the horizontal energy dissipation per unit area
(Hor) can be calculated as follows:
=arg min
𝑡Horizontal(Hy brid )
Sensor total
2. ()
Figure shows the energy dissipation per unit area Hor
versus threshold range .Inthesimulation,wesetthe
parameters as follows: the center frequency 0as z, the
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as  dB, the constant noise power
spectral density 0as dB, the packet size as  bits, and
the transceiver energy dissipation ratio as /.
As shown in Figure ,Hor has minimum value at the
threshold annulus. erefore, we can choose these threshold
ranges to calculate the energy dissipation of the proposed
hybrid data transmission method horizontally.
5.3. Calculation of the Vertical reshold Layer .is section
introduces how to calculate the vertical threshold layer ,
described in Section .. When the hybrid data transmission
method is applied between layers, () shows the total vertical
energy consumption of nanorouters. erefore, we need to
decide threshold layer in the way of minimizing the total
vertical energy dissipation. For this, the resulting relationship
is expressed as follows:
=arg min
𝑙Ver t i cal (Hybrid)
Router total(2≤<).()
Figure shows the relationship between the total number
of layers andthethresholdlayer.InFigure ,wecan
decide the threshold layer in the way of minimizing the
energy dissipation vertically.
5.4. Energy Dissipation Analysis. For the data transmission
among nanorouter and nanosensors (also among nanosen-
sors, resp.) in each layer, three dierent transmission
schemes,thatis,H,M,andDmethods,areusedtocompare
the performance of the transceiver energy consumption.
Figure shows the energy dissipation of the transceivers with
respecttothefarthestannulusnumberand the edge length
.
As shown in Figure , the data transmission methods,
H and M, outperform the method D. In the method D, the
energy consumption of the nanosensor varies with respect
to the annulus number. At the initial stage (i.e., the annulus
number =1), both methods, D and M, have the same
energy consumption. As growing the annulus number, the
energy consumption of method D is signicantly increased.
On the other hand, the energy consumption of method M has
aconstantvalue.Incaseof=2, method D consumes four
timesmoreenergythanmethodM.Otherwise,methodHhas
a good performance when the farthest annulus number is
more than a certain threshold, whereas method M is good
overall.
On the other hand, Figure compares the energy dissipa-
tion of dierent data transmission methods between layers,
thatis,methodH,methodM,andmethodD.Asgivenin
Figure , method H and method M show almost identical
results, whereas method D consumes more energy. When the
farthest annulus number is small, the energy dissipation
of method D is monotonically increased, whereas the energy
dissipation is saturated when is increased.
Figure shows the energy consumption comparison of
various combinations of the data transmission methods.
Notice that the combinations of the direct and other methods
(D-H, D-M, D-D, H-D, and M-D) destructively waste the
 International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
0246810
reshold range t
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
ΔEHor
W = 10, S = 4.83 mm
Minimum =4
1000
2000
3000
−10000
Minimum =5
W = 20, S = 2.46 mm
0 5 10 15 20
reshold range t
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
−1000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
reshold range t
Minimum =6
W = 30, S = 1.65 mm
0
2000
4000
6000
−2000
W = 40, S = 1.24 mm
Minimum =7
0 10203040
reshold range t
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
−2000 010 20 30 40 50
reshold range t
W = 50, S = 0.99 mm
Minimum =7
010 20 30 40 50 60
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
−2000
W = 60, S = 0.83 mm
Minimum =8
reshold range t
0
ΔEHor
ΔEHor
ΔEHor
ΔEHor
ΔEHor
F : Energy dissipation per unit area (Hor) versus threshold range ().
010 20 30
0
10
20
30
Total number of layer H
S=4.83mm,H= 31
reshold layer l
0 20 40 60
0
20
40
60
S = 2.46 mm,H= 61
reshold layer l
Total number of layer H
0 20 40 60 80
0
20
40
60
80 S = 1.65 mm,H= 91
reshold layer l
Total number of layer H
050 100
0
50
100 S = 1.24 mm, H = 121
reshold layer l
Total number of layer H
0 50 100 150
0
50
100
150
S = 0.99 mm,H= 151
reshold layer l
Total number of layer H
050 100 150
0
50
100
150 S = 0.83 mm, H = 181
reshold layer l
Total number of layer H
F : Relationship between the total number of layers and the threshold layer .
0246810
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
W = 10, S = 4.83 mm
×104
0 5 10 15 20
0
1
2
3
4
W = 20, S = 2.46 mm
×104
0 10 20 30
0
2
4
6
W = 30, S = 1.65 mm
×104
010 20 30 40
0
2
4
6
W = 40, S = 1.24 mm
EHorizontal(Hybrid)EHorizontal(Multi-hop)EHorizontal(Direct)
×104
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
2
4
6
8
W = 50, S = 0.99 mm
×104
020 40 60
0
5
10
W = 60, S = 0.83 mm
×104
F : Energy consumption analysis within layer.
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 
0 102030
0
1
2
3
W = 10, S = 4.83 mm
×105
0 204060
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
W = 20, S = 2.46 mm
×106
0 20406080
0
1
2
3
4
W = 30, S = 1.65 mm
×106
0 50 100 150
0
5
10
15
W = 50, S = 0.99 mm
×106
0 50 100
0
2
4
6
8
W = 40, S = 1.24 mm
×106
0 50 100 150
0
1
2
3
4
W = 60, S = 0.83 mm
×106
EVer t ic a l(Hy brid)EVe r ti c al (Multi-hop)EVer t ic a l(Direct)
F : Energy consumption analysis between Layers.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
W = 10, S = 4.83 mm
×105
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
W = 20, S = 2.46 mm
×105
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
W = 30, S = 1.65 mm
×105
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
E(H, H)
E(M, H)
E(D, H)
E(H, M)
E(M, M)
E(D, M)
E(H, D)
E(M, D)
E(D, D)
W = 40, S = 1.24 mm
×105
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
W = 50, S = 0.99 mm
×105
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
W = 60, S = 0.83 mm
×105
F : Energy consumption comparison of various combinations of data transmission methods.
transceiver energy compared to the combination H-H or
M-H. As shown in Figure , H-H (or M-H) combination
improves the average energy dissipation compared with D-
H, D-M, H-D, M-D, and D-D.
6. Conclusion and Future Works
In this paper, we propose a WNSN paradigm for intrabody
application. e scenario of application is that each nanosen-
sornodewouldbeplacedwithineachcellandthattheywill
communicate with their immediate neighbor cell according
to the combinations of transmission methods. Each cell is
modeled as a hexagonal shaped cell, therefore giving a D
structure for WNSN.
e contribution of this paper is twofold. First one is the
derivation of the ideal number of hexagonal cells and the
edge length in proportion to the needed annulus number
horizontally for the supposed organ of the body. e other
one is a comparative analysis of the energy eciency in the
process of data transmission, showing that H-H (or M-H)
combination improves the average energy dissipation com-
pared with D-H, D-M, H-D, M-D, and D-D combinations.
Some issues still remain to be solved in the future. First,
we need to verify the proposed conceptual model in real
 International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
environment to be used for intrabody application. Second, we
also need to implement the most ecient data transmission
methods and the network protocols based on OOK and
TDMA framework and to verify them in that environment.
Conflict of Interests
e authors declare that there is no conict of interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgment
is work was supported by the Pukyong National University
Research Abroad Fund in  (C-D--).
References
[] I. F. Akyildiz and J. M. Jornet, “e Internet of nano-things,
IEEE Wireless Communications,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] D. Kurup, W. Joseph, G. Vermeeren, and L. Martens, “In-body
path loss model for homogeneous human tissues, IEEE Tran-
sactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility,vol.,no.,pp.
–, .
[] I.F.AkyildizandJ.M.Jornet,“Electromagneticwirelessnano-
sensor networks, Nano Communication Networks,vol.,no.,
pp. –, .
[] K. Yang, A. Alomainy, and Y. Hao, “In-vivo characterisation
and numerical analysis of the THz radio channel for nanoscale
body-centric wireless networks, in Proceedings of the USNC-
URSI Radio Science Meeting (Joint with AP-S Symposium)
(USNC-URSI ’13), pp. –, IEEE, Lake Buena Vista, Fla,
USA, July .
[] K. Yang, A. Pellegrini, A. Brizzi, A. Alomainy, and Y. Hao,
“Numerical analysis of the communication channel path loss
at the THz band inside the fat tissue, in Proceedings of the
IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on RF
and Wireless Tecbhnologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Appli-
cations (IMWS-BIO ’13), December .
[] K.Yang,A.Pellegrini,M.O.Munoz,A.Brizzi,A.Alomainy,
and Y. Hao, “Numerical analysis and characterization of THz
propagation channel for body-centric nano-communications,
IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology,vol.,
no. , pp. –, .
[] T.NakanoandJ.-Q.Liu,“Designandanalysisofmolecularrelay
channels: an information theoretic approach, IEEE Transac-
tions on Nanobioscience,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] S. Balasubramaniam and P. Lio’, “Multi-hop conjugation based
bacteria nanonetworks, IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience,
vol.,no.,pp.,.
[]T.Kuila,S.Bose,P.Khanra,A.K.Mishra,N.H.Kim,and
J. H. Lee, “Recent advances in graphene-based biosensors,
Biosensors and Bioelectronics,vol.,no.,pp.,
.
[] Z. L. Wang, “Energy harvesting for self-powered nanosystems,
Nano Research,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] P. Wang, J. M. Jornet, M. G. Abbas Malik, N. Akkari, and I.
F. Akyildiz, “Energy and spectrum-aware MAC protocol for
perpetual wireless nanosensor networks in the Terahertz Band,
Ad Hoc Networks,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] S. Balasubramaniam and J. Kangasharju, “Realizing the internet
of nano things: challenges, solutions, and applications, Com-
puter,vol.,no.,ArticleID,pp.,.
[]M.Pierobon,J.M.Jornet,N.Akkari,S.Almasri,andI.F.
Akyildiz, A routing framework for energy harvesting wireless
nanosensor networks in the Terahertz Band, Wirel ess Net works,
vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] J. M. Jornet and I. F. Akyildiz, “Channel capacity of electromag-
netic nanonetworks in the terahertz band, in Proceedings of the
IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 10),
pp. –, May .
[] J. M. Jornet and I. F. Akyildiz, “Channel modeling and capacity
analysis for electromagnetic wireless nanonetworks in the ter-
ahertz band, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,
vol. , no. , pp. –, .
[] J. M. Jornet and I. F. Akyildiz, “Information capacity of pulse-
based wireless nanosensor networks, in Proceedings of the 8th
Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor,
Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON’ 11),
pp. –, June .
[] J.M.Jornet,J.CapdevilaPujol,andJ.Sol
´
e Pareta, “PHLAME: a
physical layer aware MAC protocol for electromagnetic nano-
networks in the terahertz band, Nano Communication Net-
works,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] D. Woolard, P. Zhao, C. Rutherglen et al., “Nanoscale imaging
technology for THz-frequency transmission microscopy,” Inter-
national Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems,vol.,
no. , pp. –, .
[] D. K. Molina and V. J. M. Dimaio, “Normal organ weights in
men. Part II. e brain, lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys, e
American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology,vol.,
no. , pp. –, .
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
Rotating
Machinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Journal of
Engineering
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Mechanical
Engineering
Advances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Civil Engineering
Advances in
Acoustics and Vibration
Advances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer
Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Distributed
Sensor Networks
International Journal of
The Scientic
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Sensors
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Modelling &
Simulation
in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Active and Passive
Electronic Components
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Chemical Engineering
International Journal of
Control Science
and Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Navigation and
Observation
International Journal of
Advances in
OptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Robotics
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
... For example, there is the possibility of the potential collisions in the shared wireless channel when the data are collected by nano-nodes which have limited power capabilities. This limitation causes nanonetworks to require a robust communication platform to guarantee an efficient TDMA energy aware MAC layer protocol [6]. Present fairly in communication chances for each nano-node, it requires a new MAC protocol which should be simple and energy-constrained. ...
... EM-based nano-communication network issues include the following research domains; architectures and systems for nano-communications, information theory aspects of nanocommunications, communication protocols for nanonetworks or nano-sensor networks, nano-addressing and nano-coding for communications, modeling and simulation of nanonetworks, and realization of nano-applications [6]. In this paper, we concentrate on the domain of energy efficient MAC protocol design derived from an existing Zigbee MAC protocol for Low-Rate Personal Area Networks [7]. ...
Preprint
Devices in a beacon-enabled network use slotted CSMA/CA to contend for channel usage. Each node in the network competes for the channels when ready to transmit data. The slotted CSMA/CA mechanism based on the super-frame structure fairly provides communication chance for each node and makes a reasonable usage of the available energy in beacon-enabled Zigbee networks. When wireless nano-sensor nodes are implanted into the target human body area for detecting disease symptoms or virus existence, each node also requires a similar characteristic in channel sharing and in the transmission of event-driven data with a short length. In this paper, we suggest a wireless network model with nano-sensor nodes for the in-body application. We propose a novel MAC protocol derived from an existing Zigbee MAC protocol scheme and analyze the performance of energy usage with variable super-frame durations and packet sizes.
... In another study, Dressler and Fischer investigated connecting a body area network with in-body nanodevices [20], identified the challenges of such integration, proposed associated network architecture, and laid the foundation for simulation-based performance evaluation of such concepts. A WNSN, formed by hexagonal cell-based nanosensors deployed randomly at different body organs, was proposed in [23] for intra-body disease detection as an application of the IoNT. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Current developments in nanotechnology make electromagnetic communication (EC) possible at the nanoscale for applications involving Wireless [Body] Sensor Networks (W[B]SNs). This specialized branch of WSN has emerged as an important research area contributing to medical treatment, social welfare, and sports. The concept is based on the interaction of integrated nanoscale machines by means of wireless communications. One key hurdle for advancing nanocommunications is the lack of an apposite networking protocol to address the upcoming needs of the nanonetworks. Recently, some key challenges have been identified, such as nanonodes with extreme energy constraints, limited computational capabilities, Terahertz frequency bands with limited transmission range, etc., in designing protocols for wireless nanosensor networks (WNN). This work proposes an improved performance scheme of nanocommunication over Terahertz bands for wireless BSNs making it suitable for smart e-health applications. The scheme contains -- a new energy-efficient forwarding routine for EC in WNN consisting of hybrid clusters with centralized scheduling, a model designed for channel behavior taking into account the aggregated impact of molecular absorption, spreading loss, and shadowing, and an energy model for energy harvesting and consumption. The outage probability is derived for both single and multilinks and extended to determine the outage capacity. The outage probability for a multilink is derived using a cooperative fusion technique at a predefined fusion node. Simulated using a Nano-Sim simulator, performance of the proposed model has been evaluated for energy efficiency, outage capacity, and outage probability. The results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed scheme through maximized energy utilization in both single and multihop communication, multisensor fusion enhances the link quality of the transmission.
... Both physicians and patients can view this data from the nano sensors on a wearable device. It is not possible using the conventional diagnostic methods [2,3,5,27,33,34,35]. ...
Article
Full-text available
INTRODUCTION: Internet of NanoThings (IoNT) is regarded as the next generation of the Internet of Things due to its bright future and wide range of applications . According to the global "Internet of Nanothings (IoNT) Market" research, there has been good growth in recent years, and this trend is expected to continue until 2030. IoNT is basically the Internet of Things on a nanoscale. IoNT essentially describes how nanoscale devices are connected to one another within current networks. A high-speed network can be used to connect different nanodevices through the IoNT. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the architecture, benefits and applications of IoNT.OBJECTIVES: The objective is to provide insights into IoNT framework and it applications in fields like healthcare, food industry, agriculture , environment monitoring etc,METHODS: This study explored the IoNT architecture and its applications. The exploration involves reviewing the articles, journals and other web resources. RESULTS: Highlights the aspects of IoNT and emphasizing the importance of its applications in various fields. The need to combine this research and emphasize the IoNT related applications stems from the dearth of research in the field.CONCLUSION: The world is becoming increasingly developed as a result of ongoing technological advancements. Future developments, which are expected to peak in the next one to two decades, will be led by IoT and nanotechnology. IoNT offers potential and means to enhance numerous facets of individuals' lives. Its primary characteristics are monitoring and diagnostic services, which support and improve decision-making and outcomes across a range of application domains.
... [8] Integration of nanosensors and IoT devices How can nanosensors be seamlessly integrated into existing IoT devices for IoNT implementation? [9] What are the challenges and opportunities in developing miniaturized, energy-efficient sensors for IoNT? [10] Privacy and security in IoNT ...
Article
Full-text available
In an era of rapid technological advancement, the paradigm of smart environments has flourished, encompassing diverse realms like offices, homes, and cities. This expansion underscores the growing interconnection of applications and integration of the internet. Central to this evolution is the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT), which epitomizes seamless interconnectivity orchestrated by the Internet. As technology advances, a more intricate dimension unfolds – the Internet of Nano Things (IoNT). This paradigm converges nanotechnology and IoT, facilitating nanoscale device interconnection through existing networks. The IoNT’s emergence presents diverse applications, alongside novel challenges, and research opportunities. This study navigates the contemporary landscape, scrutinizing trends, applications, and forthcoming challenges across various domains of societal significance. IoNT’s potential as a research avenue with implications for societal welfare becomes evident. Upon analysis, the prominence of technology in current IoNT discourse becomes apparent. Healthcare emerges as a pivotal domain, driven by IoNT applications, yet international standards concerning privacy, security, and nano-network architecture remain elusive. IoNT’s emergence offers profound research opportunities and technological advancements, prompting collaborative efforts to address standardization and security intricacies. These endeavors seek to harness IoNT’s transformative potential across diverse societal realms.
... Nevertheless, integrating nanoscale devices with the IoTbased network states an innovative networking paradigm named the Internet of Nano Things (IoNT) [216]. IoNT is a small-scale IoT, an ideal solution for medical applications and remote environmental monitoring, and is the most ongoing nano-scale network of interconnected physical objects with nano communication [27,66,68,[218][219][220][221][222]. Furthermore, IoNT is the interconnection of nano-scale devices (shown in Figure 9), existing communication technologies (for instance, sensors networks, big data analytics, cloud, and Fog computing), and the Internet to execute various operations such as sensing, computation, processing, etc. [222]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Internet of Things is emerging as an incredible future technology to improve the existing lifestyle from the research community, industry, and the public sector. The main intention of IoT is to create an efficient, interactive, and autonomous infrastructure for a safer and healthier world. Moreover, it grows faster day-to-day with the support of many other technologies, i.e. Cloud computing, Blockchain, Wireless Body Sensor Networks, Nanotechnology, and Artificial Intelligence for smart applications, including healthcare, environment, automotive industries, transportation, agriculture, etc. Nevertheless, managing big data is one of the challenging tasks due to the increased number of devices leading to various serious issues like security, privacy, accuracy, latency, scheduling, etc. Further, specific infrastructures with remarkable techniques are required to analyze the bulk of raw data to progress the quality of life and allow timely intervention through various capabilities, i.e., data capture, unique identification, actuation, communication, data mining, etc. In past literature, numerous reviews/surveys are presented that explore the technologies mentioned above as standalone and application specific. However, this paper aims to integrate all the mentioned technologies and deliver a clear vision to future researchers (newcomers) as a kick-start article to boost up and understand the status of the existing research through a comprehensive review of the Internet of Things and its evolution in wireless telecommunications from a general perspective. The most significant challenges and issues are highlighted to research further in these evolving domains.
Article
Full-text available
Background Scientific literature, with no conflicts of interest, shows that even below the limits defined by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, microwaves from telecommunication technologies cause numerous health effects: neurological, oxidative stress, carcinogenicity, deoxyribonucleic acid and immune system damage, electro-hypersensitivity. The majority of these biological effects of non-thermal microwave radiation have been known since the 1970s. Methods Detailed scientific, political, and military documents were analyzed. Most of the scientific literature comes from PubMed. The other articles (except for a few) come from impacted journals . The rare scientific documents that were not peer reviewed were produced by recognized scientists in their fields. The rest of the documentation comes from official sources: political (e.g., European Union and World Health Organization), military (e.g., US Air Force and NATO), patents, and national newspapers. Results (1) Since their emergence, the authorities have deployed and encouraged the use of wireless technologies (2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi, WiMAX, DECT, Bluetooth, cell phone towers/masts/base stations, small cells, etc.) in full awareness of their harmful effects on health. (2) Consequences of microwave radiation from communication networks are comparable to the effects of low-power directed-energy microwave weapons, whose objectives include behavioral modification through neurological (brain) targeting. Above 20 gigahertz, 5G behaves like an unconventional chemical weapon. (3) Biomedical engineering (via graphene-based nanomaterials) will enable brain-computer connections, linked wirelessly to the Internet of Everything through 5G and 6G networks (2030) and artificial intelligence, gradually leading to human-machine fusion (cyborg) before the 2050s. Conclusion Despite reports and statements from the authorities presenting the constant deployment of new wireless communication technologies, as well as medical research into nanomaterials, as society’s ideal future, in-depth research into these scientific fields shows, above all, an objective linked to the current cognitive war. It could be hypothesized that, in the future, this aim will correspond to the control of humanity by machines.
Article
Full-text available
Observable real-time injuries at the cellular level in recipients of the “safe and effective” COVID-19 injectables are documented here for the first time with the presentation of a comprehensive description and analysis of observed phenomena. The global administration of these often-mandated products from late 2020 triggered a plethora of independent research studies of the modified RNA injectable gene therapies, most notably those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna. Analyses reported here consist of precise laboratory “bench science” aiming to understand why serious debilitating, prolonged injuries (and many deaths) occurred increasingly without any measurable protective effect from the aggressively, marketed products. The contents of COVID-19 injectables were examined under a stereomicroscope at up to 400X magnification. Carefully preserved specimens were cultured in a range of distinct media to observe immediate and long-term cause-and-effect relationships between the injectables and living cells under carefully controlled conditions. From such research, reasonable inferences can be drawn about observed injuries worldwide that have occurred since the injectables were pressed upon billions of individuals. In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous — on the order of 3~4 x 106 per milliliter of the injectable — visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100 µm, or greater, of many different shapes. There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables, and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation, simple one- and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent, thin, flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains. Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time. Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.
Article
This paper presents the characteristics of electromagnetic waves propagating inside human body at Terahertz frequencies and an initial study of the system performance of nano-network. It has been observed that the path loss is not only the function of distance and frequency but also related to the dielectric loss of human tissues. Numerical results have been compared with analytical studies and a good match has been found which validates the proposed numerical model. Based on the calculation of path losses and noise level for THz wave propagation, the channel capacity is studied to give an insight of future nano-communications within the human body. Results show that at the distance of millimeters, the capacity can reach as high as 100 Terabits per second (Tbps) depending on the environment and exciting pulse types.
Conference Paper
Analytical investigations are presented to calculate the path loss and absorption coefficients of human tissues such as blood and fat at THz frequencies as an essential part of understanding nanoscale networks. From the results, it can be seen that with the rise of the distance and frequency, the path loss increases slightly as expected. For the blood, the path loss at 1mm is around 100dB while for the fat the corresponding distance to the path loss of 100dB is approximately 2mm, leading to the conclusion that at very short distances, in the order of millimeters, the path loss is not significantly high to consider communication between nano-devices.
Conference Paper
With the growth of the demand of smaller and smaller implantable devices, THz technologies becomes appealing for potential applications in Body Area Networks at nano-scale. As an essential part for understanding the in-body propagation at THz frequency numerical investigations are presented in this paper to simulate the absorption path loss of fat at THz frequency. The results of the proposed analysis suggest that a distance in the order of millimeter might be suitable to guarantee a communication link between nano-devices located in human tissues.
Article
A novel nanoscale-engineering methodology is presented that has potential for the first-time development of a microscope-system capable of collecting terahertz (THz) frequency spectroscopic signatures from microscopic biological (bio) structures. This unique THz transmission microscopy approach is motivated by prior studies on bio-materials and bio-agents (e.g., DNA, RNA and bacterial spores) that have produced spectral features within the THz frequency regime (i.e., ~ 300 GHz to 1000 GHz) that appear to be representative of the internal structure and characteristics of the constituent bio-molecules. The suggested THz transmission microscopy is a fundamentally new technological approach that seeks to avoid the limitations that exist in traditional experiments (i.e., that must average over large numbers of microscopic molecules) by prescribing a viable technique whereby the THz frequency signatures may be collected from individual bio-molecules and/or microscopic biological constructs. Specifically, it is possible to envision the development of a “nanoscale imaging array” that possesses the characteristics necessary (e.g., sub-wavelength resolution) for successfully performing “THz-frequency microscopy.”
Article
Wireless NanoSensor Networks (WNSNs) will allow novel intelligent nanomaterial-based sensors, or nanosensors, to detect new types of events at the nanoscale in a distributed fashion over extended areas. Two main characteristics are expected to guide the design of WNSNs architectures and protocols, namely, their Terahertz Band wireless communication and their nanoscale energy harvesting process. In this paper, a routing framework for WNSNs is proposed to optimize the use of the harvested energy to guarantee the perpetual operation of the WNSN while, at the same time, increasing the overall network throughput. The proposed routing framework, which is based on a previously proposed medium access control protocol for the joint throughput and lifetime optimization in WNSNs, uses a hierarchical cluster-based architecture that offloads the network operation complexity from the individual nanosensors towards the cluster heads, or nano-controllers. This framework is based on the evaluation of the probability of saving energy through a multi-hop transmission, the tuning of the transmission power of each nanosensor for throughput and hop distance optimization, and the selection of the next hop nanosensor on the basis of their available energy and current load. The performance of this framework is also numerically evaluated in terms of energy, capacity, and delay, and compared to that of the single-hop communication for the same WNSN scenario. The results show how the energy per bit consumption and the achievable throughput can be jointly maximized by exploiting the peculiarities of this networking paradigm.
Article
a b s t r a c t Nanonetworks will enable advanced applications of nanotechnology in the biomedical, industrial, environmental and military fields, by allowing integrated nano-devices to communicate and to share information. Due to the expectedly very high density of nano-devices in nanonetworks, novel Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols are needed to regulate the access to the channel and to coordinate concurrent transmissions among nano-devices. In this paper, a new PHysical Layer Aware MAC protocol for Electromagnetic nanonetworks in the Terahertz Band (PHLAME) is presented. This protocol is built on top of a novel pulse-based communication scheme for nanonetworks and exploits the benefits of novel low-weight channel coding schemes. In PHLAME, the transmitting and receiving nano-devices jointly select the optimal communication scheme parameters and the channel coding scheme which maximize the probability of successfully decoding the received information while minimizing the generated multi-user interference. The performance of the protocol is analyzed in terms of energy consumption, delay and achievable throughput, by taking also into account the energy limitations of nano-devices. The results show that PHLAME, by exploiting the properties of the Terahertz Band and being aware of the nano-devices' limitations, is able to support very densely populated nanonetworks with nano-devices transmitting at tens of Gigabit/second.
Conference Paper
Nanotechnology is enabling the development of sensing devices just a few hundreds of nanometers in size, which are able to measure new types of events in the nanoscale by exploiting the properties of novel nanomaterials. Wireless communication among these nanosensors will boost the range of applications of nanotechnology in the biomedical, environmental and military fields, amongst others. Within the different alternatives for communication in the nanoscale, recent advancements in nanomaterials point to the Terahertz band (0.1-10.0 THz) as the frequency range of operation of future electronic nano-devices. This still unlicensed band can theoretically support very large transmission bit-rates in the short range, i.e., for distances below one meter. More importantly, the Terahertz band also enables very simple communication mechanisms suited to the very limited capabilities of nanosensors. In this paper, a new communication paradigm called TS-OOK (Time Spread On-Off Keying) for Electromagnetic Wireless Nanosensor Networks (WNSNs) is presented. This new technique is based on the transmission of femtosecond-long pulses by following an on-off keying modulation spread in time. The performance of this scheme is assessed in terms of information capacity for the single-user case as well as aggregated network capacity for the multiuser case. The results show that by exploiting the peculiarities of the Terahertz band, this scheme provides a very simple but robust communication technique for WNSNs. Moreover, it is shown that, due to the peculiar behavior of the noise in the Terahertz band, the single-user capacity and the aggregated network capacity can exceed those of the AWGN channel classical wireless networks, when the appropriate channel codes are used.
Article
Nanotechnologies promise new solutions for several applications in the biomedical, industrial and military fields. At the nanoscale, a nanomachine is considered as the most basic functional unit which is able to perform very simple tasks. Communication among nanomachines will allow them to accomplish more complex functions in a distributed manner. In this paper, the state of the art in molecular electronics is reviewed to motivate the study of the Terahertz Band (0.1-10.0 THz) for electromagnetic (EM) communication among nano-devices. A new propagation model for EM communications in the Terahertz Band is developed based on radiative transfer theory and in light of molecular absorption. This model accounts for the total path loss and the molecular absorption noise that a wave in the Terahertz Band suffers when propagating over very short distances. Finally, the channel capacity of the Terahertz Band is investigated by using this model for different power allocation schemes, including a scheme based on the transmission of femtosecond-long pulses. The results show that for very short transmission distances, in the order of several tens of millimeters, the Terahertz channel supports very large bit-rates, up to few terabits per second, which enables a radically different communication paradigm for nanonetworks.