ArticlePDF Available

GALEN AND HIS CONTRIBUTION TO ANATOMY: A REVIEW

Authors:

Abstract

Galen of Pergamum was the most famous Greek physician during the Roman period (129 - 200 AD). He was a brilliant anatomist and pioneer of experimental physiology . 1,2 He was both a universal genius and a prolific writer. He pioneered the concepts of anatomy, physiology and therapeutics. He is credited as being the first to discover that arteries carry blood, not air, as was previously beli eved. He developed medical tools for surgery and dissection and wrote many volumes of his discoveries and observations . 2,3 He was one of the leading thinkers in medicine and one of the best known physicians of all times . 4
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
REVIEW ARTICLE
J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eISSN- 2278-4802, pISSN- 2278-4748/ Vol. 4/ Issue 26/ Mar 30, 2015 Page 4509
GALEN AND HIS CONTRIBUTION TO ANATOMY: A REVIEW
Rajkumari Ajita
1
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:
Rajkumari Ajita. Galen and his Contribution to Anatomy: A Review”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental
Sciences 2015; Vol. 4, Issue 26, March 30; Page: 4509-4516, DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
INTRODUCTION: Galen of Pergamum was the most famous Greek physician during the Roman
period (129-200 AD). He was a brilliant anatomist and pioneer of experimental physiology.
1,2
He was
both a universal genius and a prolific writer. He pioneered the concepts of anatomy, physiology and
therapeutics. He is credited as being the first to discover that arteries carry blood, not air, as was
previously believed. He developed medical tools for surgery and dissection and wrote many volumes
of his discoveries and observations.
2,3
He was one of the leading thinkers in medicine and one of the
best known physicians of all times.
4
He was not only a gifted practitioner but also a first class anatomist, physiologist, pathologist,
and pharmacologist of the ancient times. During fourteen centuries, Galen's works were undisputable
textbooks for students of medicine and most valuable manuals for practitioners besides the works of
Hippocrates. He established the fundamentals of the medical science which are still significant.
5
Galen
was the first to attempt to formulate a classification of diseases and symptoms with a strong basis in
anatomy.
6
In this review article, an exhaustive analysis and attempt has been made thereby depicting
the biography of Galen and reviewing his multiple contributions in the fields of medicine and
anatomy under various sub-headings and the same has been discussed with the available literatures.
GALEN'S EDUCATION, EARLY LIFE AND TRAINING: Galen was born in Pergamum on the Ionic coast
of Asia Minor in 129 AD under Roman jurisdiction. His father, Nikon, was a well-respected, wealthy
architect- engineer who took an active role in Galen's liberal early education concentrating on
mathematical and philosophical subjects, notably geometry and logic. This seems to have influenced
his methodological approach to medicine. His strong views on the importance of philosophy in
medical training reflected his eclectic, extensive, philosophical education.
7
His father was Galen's only
teacher up to the age of fourteen and a strong role model. In his book "On the Passions and Errors of
the Soul", Galen says he was "fortunate in having the most devoted of fathers". His first anatomy
teacher was Satyrus, a pupil of Quintus, who through his students played a major role in the increase
in activity in the field of anatomy that led to Galen's work.
8
ANATOMICAL AND MEDICAL STUDIES: Galen regarded anatomy as the foundation of medical
knowledge and he frequently dissected and experimented on such lower animals as the Barbary ape
(or African monkey), pigs, sheep, and goats. He distinguished seven pairs of cranial nerves, described
the valves of the heart and observed the structural differences between arteries and veins. He was
seriously hampered by the prevailing social taboo against dissecting human corpses. However, the
inferences he made about human anatomy based on his dissections of animals often led him into
errors. His anatomy of the uterus, for example, is largely that of the dog's. According to Galen, blood is
formed in the liver and is then carried by the veins to all parts of the body, where it is used up as
nutriment or is transformed into flesh and other substances. While human dissection was not
considered during his time, Galen performed dissections on animals assuming that human organs
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
REVIEW ARTICLE
J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eISSN- 2278-4802, pISSN- 2278-4748/ Vol. 4/ Issue 26/ Mar 30, 2015 Page 4510
were identical.
9,10
Treating severe injuries of the gladiators, he enhanced his knowledge of anatomy,
physiology, trauma and sports medicine.
11
METHODS AND ACHIEVEMENTS: Anatomy was very important to Galen. He believed that "the
working body is not understandable without knowledge of its structure". Galen did not dissect
humans because of the negative social and religious stigmas associated with experimentation on the
human body, but he performed dissections and vivisection experiments on many animals including
apes, goats, dogs, and pigs. Because he could only study animals, some of Galen's anatomical
assertions were inaccurate with respect to the humans. Galen's reliance on anatomy and experiment
showed his belief in the value of observation in medicine. He argued that diseases were
manifestations of impaired anatomical functioning, so in order to diagnose and to treat disease, a
fundamental understanding of the human structure was critical.
One of Galen's major advances was his work on the movement of blood in the body. While he
never explained how the blood circulated, he made many important discoveries regarding the
movement of blood in the body, including the differences between veins and arteries and the
anatomy of the heart and its associated vasculature. His precise descriptions and studies of
neurological functions and anatomy also led to major breakthroughs. He used dissection to explore
the anatomy of the brain and spinal cord, including the spinal nerves. Not only did he explore
anatomy, but he also demonstrated the functions of nerves. He also explored many other aspects of
the human body, including the eyes, tongue, larynx, fetal development and reproductive organs. In
addition, his experiments with the kidneys showed that they were functionally related to the bladder.
Galen viewed the body as consisting of three connected systems: the brain and nerves, which are
responsible for sensation and thought; the heart and arteries, responsible for life-giving energy; and
the liver and veins, responsible for nutrition and growth.
TREATMENT METHODS AND THEORIES: The foundation of all of Galen's treatment methods was
his belief that disease resulted from an internal imbalance of the four humours: air (blood), fire
(yellow bile), earth (black bile) and water (phlegm). Unlike Hippocrates, who believed that disease
resulted from a humoral imbalance throughout the body, Galen believed that a disease-causing
imbalance could be located within an organ. Drugs developed by Galen were made from herbs that he
collected from all over the world. The drugs were classified by their properties - heating, cooling,
drying, or moistening and were applied so as to counteract whatever humour disproportion existed.
Galen was the first physician to use the pulse as an indicator of illness when compared to the normal
pulse. Galen used pulse observations to diagnose diseases and symptoms such as fevers.
6
He created his own theories from those principle and much of Galen's work can be seen as
building on the Hippocratice theories of the body, rather than being purely innovative. He carried on
the work of Hippocrates by teaching that Doctors should study the symptoms of a disease before they
treated it. His medicine was based on the ideas of the Greeks and Romans. His ideas were widely
accepted because they fitted in with other Greek ideas about nature, which were believed in the
Middle Ages. A good example of this is the theory of the four humours.
THE THEORY OF THE FOUR HUMOURS: Greek thinkers emphasized the idea of balance in all things,
including medicine. They believed in the importance of a balanced lifestyle; to eat in moderation, take
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
REVIEW ARTICLE
J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eISSN- 2278-4802, pISSN- 2278-4748/ Vol. 4/ Issue 26/ Mar 30, 2015 Page 4511
some exercise, sleep regularly and keep clean. In their search for the natural basis of all things, these
thinkers came up with the four elements: earth, air, fire and water. These elements were linked to the
four seasons and also to the four "humours" inside each human being: yellow bile, black bile, blood
and phlegm. Galen believed that imbalance in any of these caused illness. Doctors could restore the
balance by treating patients e.g. if a patient had a fever, his body needed cooling to restore the
balance of humours and therefore a cold drink might be prescribed.
4
GALEN'S CONCEPT OF DISEASE: Galen defined disease as impairment of bodily activities. Whatever
that impairs the bodily activities is the cause of disease. It is Galen’s great contribution to Western
medicine to have laid a foundation of pathology by combining physiological and anatomical point of
view.
12
He was the first to attempt to formulate a classification of diseases and symptoms with a
strong basis in anatomy.
6
GALEN'S VIEWS ON THE ANATOMY OF THE EYE: He believed that the eye was composed of
membranes and fluids. He distinguished the following membranes of the eye: the cornea, the sclera,
the choroid, the capsula of the lens and the retina, as well as the structure covering the muscles of the
eye and joining the individual elements of the eye with the orbital cavity and the skull. The following
were considered as fluid substances of the eye: egg-shaped fluid (i.e. albuminous fluid), crystal fluid
(i.e. the lens) and vitreous fluid. His theory of vision assumes the existence of a specific life force
called pneuma, which is under a considerable influence of the soul and which reaches the eye from
the brain through small channels in the optic nerve.
13
OBESITY AND TREATMENT: Galen was among the first to establish scientific methods to describe
and treat morbid obesity. He stated that obesity results from the surplus of "bad humours" in the
body and specifically from a surplus of blood. Nevertheless, he proposed some treatments for obesity
such as diet, exercise, and medications that are still valuable and are nearly the same as what is
advocated today.
14
GALEN AS A PIONEER OF SPINE RESEARCH: Galen marked the history of medicine for more than 14
centuries. His doctrines, expressed in his voluminous work, combined the medical heritage of the
Hippocratic, the Alexandrian and some of the most important medical schools of antiquity. The strong
influence of the Hippocratic tradition can characteristically be traced in orthopaedics and particularly
in Galen's presentation of the spine. Based on his observations, derived from dissection and
vivisection of animals, Galen established a pioneer model for the study of human spine. His research
ended in an accurate description of the vertebral column and the spinal cord. He also described the
course and the distribution of the nerves emerging from the spine. Galen was the first physician to
demonstrate the neurological implications following transection of the spinal cord at several
levels.
3,11
GALEN'S MAJOR WORKS: His "On the Elements according to Hippocrates" describes the
philosopher's system of four bodily humours, blood, yellow bile, black bile and phlegm, which were
identified with the four classical elements and in turn with the seasons. Amongst Galen's own major
anatomical works are a seventeen-volume "On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Human Body" and
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
REVIEW ARTICLE
J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eISSN- 2278-4802, pISSN- 2278-4748/ Vol. 4/ Issue 26/ Mar 30, 2015 Page 4512
"On Anatomical Procedure". He made extraordinary advances in anatomy which were not challenged
until the time of Andreas Vesalius. His dissections were of animals, which he then extrapolated to
human anatomy resulting in some unworthy errors.
6,15
Galen was the first to describe the ureters
with their functions, as well as organising the bones of the skeletons with their muscle
attachments.
16
On the basis of his own anatomical researches and logical conclusions, Galen
established connections between (i) the brain and the mind, (ii) the heart and the emotions and
feelings and (iii) the liver and certain appetitive sentiments like hunger or thirst.
17
GALEN'S PHYSIOLOGY: Galen’s genius was evident in physiological experiments conducted on
animals. The work "On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Human Body" comprised seventeen books
concerning with this topic. To study the function of the kidneys in producing urine, he tied the ureters
and observed the swelling of the kidneys. To study the function of the nerves, he cut them and
thereby showed paralysis of the shoulder muscles after division of nerves in the neck and loss of
voice after interruption of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Descriptions in the Galenic "On the Anatomy
of Nerves" appear vague at first sight, but the described structures can be identified in most cases
without doubt on the basic of anatomical knowledge.
18
GALEN'S SUCCESS: His books were used to teach new Doctors and so his ideas remained important
for the next thousand years until the Middle Ages. This meant that his mistakes were also passed on,
which may have prevented the understanding and treatment of illnesses. Galen was not a Christian or
a Muslim, but he believed in one God and talked about 'the creator'. This made his work acceptable to
both Christian and Islamic cultures as it fitted in with their teachings. He is remembered among
pharmacists for his classification of animal and vegetable extracts which are still known as Galenicals.
As a practicing anatomist, Galen was possibly the first exponent of scientific method applied to the
vivisection and post-mortem dissection of animals, especially the Barbary ape. It is not thought that
he carried out any dissection of the human body. He concluded that the diaphragm and thoracic
muscles were responsible for expansion of the chest cavity in inspiration. He was one of the first to
describe correctly the function of kidneys and explain micturition. He proved that urine was formed
in the kidneys. Before, Doctors had thought it was formed in the bladder. Among his many
neologisms, he coined the term ureter and he was probably the first to recognize the value of a
competent ureterovesical valve. Galen advocated catheterization for urinary obstruction.
19
Galen, a prolific writer, produced hundreds of works, of which about 120 have survived. His
most important contributions were in anatomy. His descriptions of bones and muscle were notable.
He was the first to observe that muscles work in contracting pairs and described the heart valves and
the structural differences between arteries and veins. He used experiments to demonstrate paralysis
resulting from spinal cord injuries and the passage of urine from kidneys to bladder. Galen pioneered
diagnostic use of the pulse rate. One of his most lasting technique that is still practiced by Doctors
today is taking the pulse of a patient. In his extensive travels, Galen also collected plants with healing
properties and explained their uses.
GALEN'S MISTAKES AND ERRORS: Unfortunately for medieval medicine, Galen made critical errors
about the heart and blood vessels that remained virtually unchallenged for 1,400 years. Because his
knowledge was derived for the most part from animals rather than human dissection, he made many
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
REVIEW ARTICLE
J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eISSN- 2278-4802, pISSN- 2278-4748/ Vol. 4/ Issue 26/ Mar 30, 2015 Page 4513
mistakes, especially concerning the internal organs. One of Galen's most notable mistakes was to
think that the heart was divided in two parts. He maintained that blood permeated the septum
between left and right ventricle and persisted in the Hippocratic misconception that the body's fluids
were composed of an equilibrium of four humours (black bile, yellow bile, blood, and phlegm) and
the rationale of medicine was to restore any disease-causing imbalance. Galen accepted the common
view that disease was caused by an imbalance of these 'four humours' in the human body.
He also believed that blood formed in the liver and was circulated from there throughout the
body in the veins. He showed that arteries contain blood, but thought they also contained and
distributed pneuma, a vital spirit. His error, which will become the established medical orthodoxy for
centuries, is to assume that the blood goes back and forth from the heart in an ebb-and-flow motion.
His errors were not seriously challenged in medical thought and teaching until the anatomist Andreas
Vesalius in 1543 and the physiologist William Harvey in 1628 courageously questioned the
infallibility of Galenic authority and effectively substantiated their findings through demonstration.
Galen's teachings became the ultimate medical authority, approved by the Christian church because
of his belief in a divine purpose for all things.
His "On Anatomical Procedures" describes in minute detail how to perform a remarkable
series of experiments by which Galen demonstrated the anatomy and the functions of the respiratory
muscles, when work on human corpses was forbidden and it became a standard text on anatomy
when rediscovered in Western Europe in the 16
th
century.
20
GALEN AND ANATOMY: Galen was able to study skeletons, but not actual bodies. This was because
religious restrictions forbade the dissection of human remains. He also stressed the importance of
understanding the skeleton and the functions of parts of the body. He gained some knowledge of
anatomy and physiology from treating wounded gladiators. Although he realized the need to carry
out experiments, human dissection was not acceptable so he had to base his ideas on the anatomy of
animals, especially the ape, which he said was closest to the human skeleton. Galen made
extraordinary advance in anatomy which were not challenged until the time of Vesalius. His
dissections were of animals, which ultimately resulted in some noteworthy errors
6
. The Anatomical
Procedures is Galen's most complete treatise on anatomy, which the Western culture came to know
only in the Renaissance.
21
LATER YEARS: Galen's library and many of his own manuscripts were destroyed in a fire at Rome's
Temple of Peace in 192 AD.
20
Yet in spite of this loss, information about his writings remains because
he wrote two treatises On My Own Books" and "On the order of My Own Books."
6
From 179 AD to
his death around 200 AD, Galen continued his medical research and writings producing such major
works as The Method of Cure. During his last years, however, he wrote more nonmedical works, such
as on the Equality of Sin and Punishment and The Slight Significance of Popular Honor and Glory.
BEYOND GALEN'S LIFETIME: His texts were kept alive primarily by the Arabs until they were
retranslated in Europe in the Middle Ages. One of the crucial causes of this endurance was that
Galen's concepts coincided, for the most part, with Christian beliefs. Of great importance was Galen's
assertion that human organs were suited for their function; this notion fit in with the Christians'
"belief in a system ordained by nature". In addition, although Galen was not Christian, his writings
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
REVIEW ARTICLE
J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eISSN- 2278-4802, pISSN- 2278-4748/ Vol. 4/ Issue 26/ Mar 30, 2015 Page 4514
expressed his belief in one God and in the body as an instrument of the soul. He tried to differentiate
between blood spitting and blood vomiting, between colic from kidney stone and colic from the
intestines. He also understood well the psychosomatic element of illness. In the fields of therapy and
of pharmacy, Galen is remembered mainly for his schematism and extremely complex prescriptions,
sometimes containing dozens of ingredients.
Unlike some of his predecessors, Galen concluded that the brain controlled cognition and
willed action. The initial evidence for this doctrine was that the brain was the site of termination of all
of the five senses: touch, taste, smell, sight, and hearing. He presumed that the information from these
five senses was organized by a part of the brain that generated a concept of an object common to all
senses; this part of the brain he considered to be the area of common sense. He thought that he could
differentiate sensory from motor nerves (not nerve fibers) by palpation. Galen considered that
common sense, cognition and memory were functions of the brain. His studies of respiration and of
the recurrent laryngeal nerve solidified the knowledge that the brain, not the chest, was the site of
the rational power that guides human behavior.
2
Apart from being an outstanding physician, he had a
great knowledge of medicines and ways of their production. Galen developed his general theory of
body functioning. It was only after his death that his works attracted more general attention. Both
theoretical developments and his works on various ailments were first recognised in the Arabic
world. It was only this fact that resulted in his works being gradually translated from Arabic into
Latin and published in Europe where they grew important among European university circles.
22
CONCLUSION: Galen's influence on medical theory, terminology and practice remained unquestioned
in Europe and the Middle East throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance. His work was so
influential there that he has been described as the Medical Pope of the Middle Ages.
19
He was one of
the originators of the science of anatomy and was probably the most important physician of all time.
His surviving writings make up about half of all ancient writings on medicine. The importance he
placed on anatomy and verification of science led his followers to create a surge in inquiries about
bodily structure and function. His influence on medicine was still crucial to modern medical science.
The progress he made in his lifetime was astonishing, especially because he managed to influence
medicine and philosophy simultaneously in dramatic ways.
5
His description of experiments on the exposed animals and animal brain is remarkable and
depicts the origins of experimental neurosurgery
6
. His achievements in anatomical science in
antiquity are unequalled.
23
Galen brought neuroanatomical knowledge and physiology together in his
study of the brain and nerves using experimental methodology which arguably represent the zenith
of neurological investigation in the ancient world.
6
Although it has been almost 2,000 years since
Galen walked the streets of the Roman Empire, his legacy continues via multiple eponyms that bear
his name. He became one of the most celebrated figures in the history of Science.
11
Urology occupies a considerable place in Galen's work. He was the first to describe the ureters
with their function, as well as organising the bones of the skeleton with their muscle attachments.
16,24
He remained the highest medical authority until Andreas Vesalius and William Harvey exposed the
fundamental errors of his system. Nevertheless, his significant contribution in the fields of medicine
and anatomy deserves to be appreciated by the medical professionals more particularly the
anatomists. It is recommended that every medical professionals and anatomists study the biography
of Galen and his multifarious contributions made in the fields of medicine and anatomy.
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
REVIEW ARTICLE
J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eISSN- 2278-4802, pISSN- 2278-4748/ Vol. 4/ Issue 26/ Mar 30, 2015 Page 4515
REFERENCES:
1. Dunn PM. Galen (AD 129-200) of Pergamun: anatomist and experimental physiologist, Arch Dis
Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: 441 - 443.
2. Freemon FR. Galen's ideas on neurological function. J Hist Neurosci. 1994 Oct; 3(4):263-71.
3. Marketos SG, Skiadas PK. Galen: a pioneer of spine research. Spine. 1999 Nov 15; 24 (22): 2358-
62.
4. Irving K. The 4 Humors and Erythrocyte Sedimentation: The most influential observation in
medical history. Am J Med Sci 2013; 364 (2): 154-157.
5. Maksimovic J. In memory of Galen - on the 1800
th
anniversary of his death. Med Pregl. 2000
May-Jun; 53 (5-6): 313-7.
6. Besser M. Galen and the origins of Experimental Neurosurgery. Austin J Surg. 2014; 1 (2):1009.
7. Johnson IJ. Galen on Diseases and Symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
8. Hunter R. Galen on the Passions and Errors of the Soul. Med Hist. 1964 Oct; 8 (4): 393 - 394.
9. Sternbach GL, Varon J, Fromm RE, Sicuro M, Baskett PJ. Galen and the origins of artificial
ventilation, the arteries and the pulse. Resuscitation. 2001; 49: 119-122.
10. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (2001) Galen.
11. Mohammadali M. Shoja, R. Shane Tubbs, Kamyar Ghabili, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Margaret
Wood Balch, Mariana Cuceu. The Roman Empire legacy of Galen (129-200 AD), Child Nerv Syst
(2015); 31:1-5.
12. Yeo IS. The concept of disease in Galen. Uisahak. 2003 Jun; 12 (1): 54-65.
13. Bieganowski L. Galen from Pergamon (130-200)-views in ophthalmology. Part II - anatomic
description of the eye. Klin Oczna. 2005; 107 (1-3): 173-6.
14. Papavramidou NS, Papavramidis ST, Christopoulou-Aletra H. Galen on obesity: etiology, effects,
and treatment. World J Surg. 2004 Jun; 28 (6): 631-5.
15. Porter R. The Greatest Benefit to Mankind. Harper Collins London: Fontana Press. 1999; 50-77.
16. Lyons AS, Petrucelli RJ. Galen. Medicine, Walton R, editors. In: An illustrated History. New York:
Abrams. 1979.
17. Hachler N. Galen's Observations on Diseases of the Soul and the Mind of Men - Researches on
the knowledge of Mental Illness in Antiquity, Rosetta. 2013; 13:53-72.
18. Sakai T, Ikeda R, Tsukisawa M. Galen "On the anatomy of nerves": Translation from the Greek
text and discussion. Nippon Ishigaku Zasshi. 2003 Sep; 49 (3): 403-54.
19. Bloom DA, Milen MT, Heininger JC. Claudius Galen: from a 20
th
century genitourinary
perspective. J Urol. 1999 Jan; 161 (1): 12-9.
20. Derenne J-Ph, Debru A, Grassino AE, Whitelaw WA. History of diaphragm physiology: the
achievements of Galen. Eur Respir J., 1995; 8 154-160.
21. Fortuna S. The Galenic treatise on the Anatomical Procedures and its first Latin translation by
Demetrius Chalcondylas. Med Secoli. 1999; 11 (1):9-28.
22. Bieganowski L. Galen of Pergamum (130-200) - his views on ophthalmology (part I). Klin
Oczna. 2004; 106 (4-5):706-10.
23. Rocca J. Anatomy. The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Hankinson RJ, Editors. New York:
Cambridge University Press. 2008; 242-262.
24. Androutsos G. Galen (121-201) and the first experimental test of ureteral function. Prog Urol.
2002 Dec; 12(6):1341-5.
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651
REVIEW ARTICLE
J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eISSN- 2278-4802, pISSN- 2278-4748/ Vol. 4/ Issue 26/ Mar 30, 2015 Page 4516
AUTHORS:
1. Rajkumari Ajita
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
1. Associate Professor, Department of
Anatomy, Regional Institute of Medical
Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India.
FINANCIAL OR OTHER
COMPETING INTERESTS: None
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Rajkumari Ajita,
Pishumthong Oinam Leikai,
Imphal West District, Imphal-795001,
Manipur, India.
E-mail: rajkumariajita13@yahoo.com
Date of Submission: 08/03/2015.
Date of Peer Review: 09/03/2015.
Date of Acceptance: 18/03/2015.
Date of Publishing: 28/03/2015.
... Systematic observations rely on dissection, leading to an increasingly accurate understanding of its structures and potential functions. Rudimentary insights into the brain acknowledge it as a noteworthy organ [3] and ascribe sensory and intellectual function to it, and in particular action, perception, and cognition [4], proposing the brain as the center of sensation, and asserting its role in intelligence, contrary to Aristotle's belief in the heart's primacy [5,6]. ...
... The importance of human anatomy in clinical practice is profound as it underpins the safe and effective patient care across all medical specialties by providing an essential understanding of bodily structures [1]. The study of anatomy dates back to ancient civilizations with pivotal contributions from historical figures like Galen and Vesalius [2]. Over time, anatomical teaching methods have evolved from traditional dissection to modern technologies such as plastination and radiological imaging. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Human anatomy is a foundational discipline in medical education, focusing on the structural and functional relationships within the human body. Rooted in ancient Greek origins, the term "anatomy" signifies the dissection and study of body structures. As medical education evolves, bridging theoretical knowledge with clinical application becomes essential. Various teaching methods aim to enhance students’ practical skills and engagement in anatomy addressing the challenge of memorization and application. Traditional teaching methods, including dissection, prosecution, tutorials, and lectures, have long been supplemented by modern approaches such as anatomical models and e-learning. Despite these advancements, the preferences of medical students and anatomy faculty towards teaching methods remain unclear. Emerging trends like e-learning and technological innovations present new opportunities and challenges, especially amid the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of effective teaching strategies. Methodology: The study was designed as a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the teaching practices of The Human Anatomy Department. The survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire, targeting medical students who had completed their first-year clinical courses. The study took place at The University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine in Khartoum State. The study population included medical students of both genders who had completed their first-year clinical courses. Inclusion criteria were students who had finished their first-year clinical courses and agreed to complete the questionnaire. Students who had not completed their first-year clinical courses were excluded from the study. The study aimed for total coverage of all first-year medical students in The University of Science and Technology with 248 participants were involved. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The questionnaire adapted from a 2019 study by S. Swetha et al. at Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, comprised 18 items. These items focused on various aspects of the current teaching methodology and assessment techniques, including preferences for teaching aids, methodologies for theoretical and practical classes and evaluation patterns for histology and embryology classes. Students selected their preferred options independently and anonymously, ensuring unbiased responses. Before distribution, approval was obtained from The Department of Anatomy, and students were informed about the study's purpose and assured of confidentiality. The questionnaire was designed to be completed within a reasonable timeframe, allowing students to provide thoughtful and candid feedback. Data entry, cleaning, and analysis were performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science) version 20 (2015). Results: A total of 248 first-year medical students from the University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine participated in the study. Of these 63.3% (157) were female, 35.9% (89) were male and 0.8% preferred not to disclose their gender. The age of participants ranged between 18 and 30 years. In terms of the duration of the anatomy curriculum 25% of the students think that it should be more than a year and half, 24.2% believed it should be a year whereas 35.1% had no idea about the appropriate duration. The current duration is 1 year and half. In regards to students’ opinion about the best teaching methods for theory classes; our study shows that 45% of students believed the best teaching methods for theory classes are lectures followed by 27 % for small groups and interactive media. Moreover, when it comes to the students' opinions about their preferred way of teaching method for practical sessions 48% of students Preferred Anatomical models, 29 % for dissection, 16.9% preferred educational videos followed by 4.8 preferred prosection. The students’ opinion towards the best source of study material (36.3%) of students Preferred study by using textbook (36.3%) (51% of them used Snell clinical anatomy followed by 34% preferred Gray’s anatomy), (35.9%) preferred the Internet as it deepened their understanding of anatomical structures and helped them to recall what they learnt, (19.4%) favored teachers notes and (8.5%) found solved questions papers more helpful. In regards to students' opinions about why integrating multimedia in learning anatomy is helpful, 58% of students said that learning anatomy using Multimedia relies on the scientific content is not boring and it Does not cause lack of attention. The student’s opinion towards Specific problems in understanding embryology, (52.4.5%) of students believed the problems are related to inability to comprehend the sequence of events, inability to visualize and inadequate time and in regards to histology most of students believed the problems are related to difficult to identify structures on the slide and insufficient time in lectures and practical. When asked about their opinion for the best possible solution for problems in learning histology and embryology, (34%) students suggest Simplify the information/ give less details/make differences clear, 29.0% for Using more visual aids including 3D models and 28.6% For More time/more lectures. Most of the students preferred the pattern that included descriptive questions, multiple-choice questions and short notes questions. And for best assessment technique to measure the knowledge in theory most students who preferred weekly tests were 55% and to measure the skills in practical sessions about 46.4 % of students preferred assessment technique Via on models and 44.4% favored assessment via dissected body. The students’ opinion towards the best possible solution for problems in theory (29.8%) of students suggested clearer explanation in lectures/tutorial and (26.2%) suggested additional time required for dissection and tutorial and towards best possible solution for problems in practical, (31%) students suggested additional time required for dissection and tutorial clearer explanation in lectures/tutorial. The study revealed varied opinions on the duration and teaching methods of the anatomy curriculum. About 35.1% of students had no idea about the duration of the curriculum while 25% felt it should be extended beyond 1.5 years. Regarding the best teaching methods for theory classes 45% preferred lectures, while 27% favored small groups and interactive media. For practical sessions 48.4% of students preferred anatomical models followed by 29.8% who favored dissection. When asked about the best source of study material 36.3% chose textbooks and 35.9% preferred the internet. The most frequently used textbook was Snell clinical (51.6%), followed by Gray’s anatomy (33.9%). Additionally, 58.1% of students preferred multimedia teaching methods, citing that it relies on scientific content, is not boring and does not cause a lack of attention. However, 64.5% believed the problems with multimedia teaching were related to the lecturer's ability to convey the material and the difficulty in imagining relationships. The study identified several specific problems in understanding anatomy, histology, and embryology. For embryology, 52.4% of students reported issues with comprehending the sequence of events, visualizing concepts and inadequate time. Similarly, for histology, students found it difficult to identify structures on slides and noted insufficient time in lectures and practical sessions. To address these issues, 29.8% of students suggested clearer explanations in lectures and tutorials while 26.2% recommended additional time for dissection and tutorials. For practical anatomy classes, 31% of students believed that providing additional time for dissection and clearer explanations would be beneficial. In terms of histology and embryology, 34.3% of students recommended simplifying information and providing less detail to make differences clearer, 29% suggested using more visual aids including 3D models and 28.6% called for more lectures. These findings highlight the need for improved teaching methods, additional resources, and better time management to enhance student understanding and engagement in these subjects. Conclusion: The study revealed that first-year medical students favored lectures for theoretical classes and anatomical models for practical sessions. While multimedia teaching methods were well-received, traditional cadaveric dissection remained important despite some negative perceptions. We recommend Educational institutions should implement a mixed examination format and incorporate continuous assessments. A balanced approach using both anatomical models and cadaveric dissection, supplemented with multimedia resources, is recommended to cater to diverse learning styles. Future studies should consider longitudinal designs to track changes in student perceptions over time and use objective measures to evaluate the effectiveness of different teaching methods. Additionally, exploring the impact of emerging technologies on anatomy education warrants further investigation.
... The hammam's hot water and air are beneficial to the body since they warm and moisturize the skin, respectively. The body is refreshed by this regimen, which also enhances hunger and allows waste to be expelled through the skin [61]. (m) Irrigation: In this procedure, the disease portion is irrigated with a medicated decoction or oil from a height above. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
The acceptance and use of any system of medicine is influenced by belief of their practitioners, founders, teachers, and most importantly the general public. According to the World Health Organization, 80% of herbal medicines are utilized worldwide for better heath. The strong belief systems that underpin herbal medicine are crucial to comprehending the concepts of health, disease, disease physiology, disease pathology, and treatment modalities. One of the oldest medical systems is Unani, which primarily uses plants as a form of treatment. The fundamental knowledge of Unani medicine was collected by famous scholars of ancient time like Buqrat (Hippocrates 460 BC, Greece), Jalinoos (Galen 129 CE, Anatolia), Zakariya Razi (Rhazes 854, Persia), Ibn Sina (Avicenna 980, Persia), and later on Hakim Ajmal Khan (1868, India) emerging to be a significant contribution to its spread in India. The foundation of the Unani system is based on the core theory of the seven basic physiological principles, temperament, self-regulating power called “Tabiat,” and six essential factors. Unani scholars employ these theories as therapeutic and diagnostic tools in their clinical practices. Patients and general population’s belief on herbal medicine particularly Unani medicine varies. Some common believes are the following: It is restrained to Muslims only, is harmless, can be taken without advice of a physician directly over the counter, is only effective in chronic diseases, and can be taken in addition along with conventional medicine. The physician should be a religious or spiritual preacher, according to the general public’s perception of Unani practitioners. These viewpoints are similar to those of other branches of traditional medicine, which all employ holistic approaches to treat illnesses rooted in a close connection to the associated religion. As a result, different groups of people favor these branches of medicine for their medical needs.
... This approach in my opinion underestimates "the human factor" and perceptual illusions like shadow plays. Still, the influence of this theory demands respect as it is most likely the primary motivator for Galen to establish the principles of the anatomy and the physiology of the eye (Ajita, 2015). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
INTRODUCTION The interest on the topic of perception can be traced back to the oldest sources of science and philosophy. It is a puzzle that has many pieces. We perceive many stimuli that mostly comes from our sensory organs at any given time, and we need to have well-functioning perceptual abilities to be able to survive and be successful in our daily life. So, one would expect for perception to be objective and constant. However, neither Greek philosophers nor the recent evidence suggest this. It is interesting when we consider that the Greek philosophers' rational assumptions about perception like "panta rhei" and the allegory of the cave was later supported by recent empirical evidence. The subjectivity and the non-stable aspects of perception were not only in the interest of philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists. Lots of other disciplines like media, illusionists and game developers have also benefitted from the research on perception. This paper will talk about how psychology and neuroscience research on perception have influenced other disciplines and how the assumption that our perceptual experiences are subjective and everchanging stayed relevant throughout the history.
... 5 The term 'sports vision' is used to describe vision care services provided to athletes. 2 As early as the second century, Claudius Galen, the most famous Greek physician during the Roman period (129-200 AD), as well as a brilliant anatomist and pioneer of experimental physiology, 6 believed that ball sports, body and visual status were interconnected. 7 However, the origin of modern sports vision is traced to Abel 8 and Fullerton 9 who studied the visual abilities of the famous baseball player 'Babe Ruth'. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Visual skills and their components are thought to be responsible for much of the manner whereby athletes obtain information about the sporting environment. The field of sports vision deals with the vision care services that are provided to athletes. If visual skills of athletes are not assumed as natural attributes, they should be assessed and be subjected to training according to need. Studies have shown that the visual abilities of the athletes can be divided into software and hardware visual skills, and it is the software visual skills that separate expert athletes from non-experts. Aim: The study aims to collate (1) studies that show the importance of visual skills in sports performance, (2) studies that show that visual skills are trainable and (3) studies that show the effect of training on the visual skills and performance in sports. Method: An extensive search of literature was performed on studies that supported the importance of vision in sports performance. Also included were studies that supported the transfer of improved visual skills to improved performance on the field of play. Results: There is literature that supports the significance of visual skills in sport. There is also literature that attempts to show evidence that improved visual skills can improve performance on the field of play. Conclusion: Sports vision practitioners need to develop standardised testing and training protocols for visual skills. Standard protocols will harmonise the development of visual skills norms. Contribution: Literature has shown the importance of vision in sports performance. Literature has also shown that improved visual skills can improve performance on the field of play. The current paper is an attempt at calling for the development of standardised protocols and norms for sports vision training.
... | 125 XIANG and VENKATESAN The work of Galen of Pergamon formed the bulk of western knowledge on the structures and functions of the human body for over a thousand years. Galen's study of human anatomy was in bulk based on animal dissection (Ajita, 2015) as well as observations from his role as the chief physician to the gladiators in Pergamum for 4 years (Robinson, 2013). Much of the basis of anatomical teaching stemmed from the writings of Galen and records of his experimentations with animals (Derenne et al., 1995). ...
Article
Full-text available
The understanding of human anatomy has been an endeavour spanning thousands of years from the Egyptians and Greeks in antiquity to the present day. Scholars and scientists have overcome great barriers to discover the inner workings and complexities of the human body, from personal challenges and prejudices to obstacles placed by society. Our present understanding of anatomy has accumulated over centuries, and progressive generations of physicians have contributed to the ever‐growing evidence‐based knowledge. This article explores the contributions made by Vesalius and his contemporaries in the first half of the sixteenth century. These enlightened scholars advanced anatomical knowledge and, perhaps more importantly, the scientific method, directly impacting the mindset and methodologies of future anatomists. Individuals such as Berengario da Carpi and Gabriele Falloppio produced bodies of work during their lifetime that were not only important in disputing the teachings of Galen of Pergamon, which had been accepted as almost unquestionable truths for a thousand years, but also instrumental in developing a new generation of scientists. The anatomists of the late renaissance were unable to resolve many of the factual inaccuracies of Galenic teaching but provided the groundwork for scientific thinking which future generations of anatomists benefited greatly from. The principles of documenting what is observed and establishing a methodical approach to question discrepancies in experiments would go on to influence physicians such as Harvey and Malpighi to investigate and draw correct conclusions in their research and ultimately advance our understanding of human anatomy to what it is today. Andreas Vesalius as illustrated by Jan van Kalkar.
... 5 The term 'sports vision' is used to describe vision care services provided to athletes. 2 As early as the second century, Claudius Galen, the most famous Greek physician during the Roman period (129-200 AD), as well as a brilliant anatomist and pioneer of experimental physiology, 6 believed that ball sports, body and visual status were interconnected. 7 However, the origin of modern sports vision is traced to Abel 8 and Fullerton 9 who studied the visual abilities of the famous baseball player 'Babe Ruth'. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Visual skills and their components are thought to be responsible for much of the manner whereby athletes obtain information about the sporting environment. The field of sports vision deals with the vision care services that are provided to athletes. If visual skills of athletes are not assumed as natural attributes, they should be assessed and be subjected to training according to need. Studies have shown that the visual abilities of the athletes can be divided into software and hardware visual skills, and it is the software visual skills that separate expert athletes from non-experts. Aim: The study aims to collate (1) studies that show the importance of visual skills in sports performance, (2) studies that show that visual skills are trainable and (3) studies that show the effect of training on the visual skills and performance in sports. Method: An extensive search of literature was performed on studies that supported the importance of vision in sports performance. Also included were studies that supported the transfer of improved visual skills to improved performance on the field of play. Results: There is literature that supports the significance of visual skills in sport. There is also literature that attempts to show evidence that improved visual skills can improve performance on the field of play. Conclusion: Sports vision practitioners need to develop standardised testing and training protocols for visual skills. Standard protocols will harmonise the development of visual skills norms. Contribution: Literature has shown the importance of vision in sports performance. Literature has also shown that improved visual skills can improve performance on the field of play. The current paper is an attempt at calling for the development of standardised protocols and norms for sports vision training.
Article
The formation and evolution of cell physiology in USSR was associated with the academician Platon Kostuk, an outstanding world-renowned scientist. His scientific activity occurred in the second half of 20th century, the period of burst-like progress in electrophysiology that provided a number of remarkable results rewarded with three Novel prizes. In biology of that time, electrophysiology was the only field, wherein methods and approaches were developed for the on-line analysis of physiological processes in cells and tissues. The goal of the given essay is to highlight retrospective aspects of the bioelectricity concept and to characterize the related contribution of the electrophysiological school of P.G. Kostuk to the field.
Chapter
History portrays the important role that art plays in anatomy and medicine, with its ability to preserve and articulate human dissections and physiological concepts. Throughout time, we see an evolution of medical illustration from elaborate and dramatized compositions during the Renaissance era to more refined and naturalistic depictions of anatomical concepts and procedures by the pioneers of art and medicine. These greats such as the Flemish “father of anatomy” Andreas Vesalius and Leonardo da Vinci gained their accolades through intricate investigation of the human body and valued the importance of practical, embodied dissection while striving for its accurate presentation. Today, medical illustrations are described as simple, clear infographics which interpret details of human dissection for a more conceptualized understanding of anatomy and are an efficient tool to ensure ease of learning and improved health care. Further progression is seen in the field of medical art with the integration of innovative imaging techniques such as three-dimensional rendering and virtual and augmented realities, which engages students while forging a true comprehension of context. Medical illustration expands beyond anatomy and can be used to convey and simplify useful information to the public and therefore acquires the responsibility of depicting diverse communities and inclusive representation. Although medical art is ever-evolving and becoming an integral part of medical curricula, the initial melding of art and anatomy had solidified its significance in science and its ability to elevate teaching and learning.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Galen of Pergamum was the physician of Roman Emperors and contributed to our early understanding of medicine and anatomy. Herein, we present a short biography of Galen and review his multiple contributions to medicine and anatomy. Conclusions Although it has been almost 2,000 years since Galen walked the streets of the Roman Empire, his legacy continues via multiple eponyms that bare his name.
Article
Full-text available
Galen (129-200 AD) produced a large written output which was to remain one of the major basis of clinical medicine for centuries. His contribution to respiration, reported in his own books and in those of Oribasius, was that of a chest physician and of an experimental physiologist. He described in minute details how to perform a remarkable series of experiments by which he demonstrated the anatomy and function of the respiratory muscles. He described the actions of the diaphragm and how it moves the rib cage, in a series of spinal chord sections and muscle denervations. He investigated the passive or active nature of expiration and made fine observations of lung movements through the exposed pleural space. He described the interaction between the lungs and chest wall and developed the concept of interaction between ribcage and abdominal muscles in maintaining the position of the diaphragm, showing a clear understanding of the principle that the diaphragm can move upward during an isovolume manoeuvre as long as the ribcage is allowed to expand. A skillful clinician, Galen applied his theories of the analysis of problems at the bedside, particularly in patients affected with dyspnoea which he attributed to respiratory muscle dysfunction.
Chapter
Galen's treatises on the classification and causation of diseases and symptoms are an important component of his prodigious oeuvre, forming a bridge between his theoretical works and his practical, clinical writings. As such, they remained an integral component of the medical teaching curriculum well into the second millennium. This edition was originally published in 2006. In these four treatises (only one of which had been previously translated into English), Galen not only provides a framework for the exhaustive classification of diseases and their symptoms as a prelude to his analysis of their causation, but he also attempts to establish precise definitions of all the key terms involved. Unlike other of his works, these treatises are notably moderate in tone, taking into account different views on structure and causation in a relatively even-handed way. Nonetheless, they are a clear statement of the Dogmatic position on the theoretical foundations of medicine in his time.
Chapter
It is with pleasure I hear GALEN reason concerning the structure of the human body. (Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, xii) INTRODUCTION In seeking the best physician, the prospective patient is advised, according to Galen, first to 'find out how wide his knowledge is and how penetrative is his training in anatomy'. For Galen, anatomy is more than a system of knowledge for its own sake. It is also used to demonstrate that Nature does nothing in vain. Further, it provides information in examining psychic or physical activities and is a precision tool for the operative practitioner. These respective epistemic, teleological, empirical and practical ends underscore the crucial place of anatomy for Galen in his medical and philosophical world. To an appreciable extent, all four cannot be entirely separated. An examination of Galen's employment of anatomy is rewarding not only because it informed his medical practice and defined for him the true worth of a physician, but also because it offers a window into his investigations into the nature of the living organism. This chapter will begin by underscoring Galen's indebtedness to his predecessors and teachers. It will next examine Galen's public anatomical demonstrations and why he felt them to be necessary.
Article
Galen's treatises on the classification and causation of diseases and symptoms are an important component of his prodigious oeuvre, forming a bridge between his theoretical works and his practical, clinical writings. As such, they remained an integral component of the medical teaching curriculum well into the second millennium. in these four treatises (only one of which has been previously translated into English), Galen not only provides a framework for the exhaustive classification of diseases and their symptoms as a prelude to his analysis of their causation, but he also attempts to establish precise definitions of all the key terms involved. Unlike other of his works, these treatises are notably moderate in tone, taking into account different views on structure and causation in a relatively even-handed way. Nonetheless, they are a clear statement of the Dogmatic position on the theoretical foundations of medicine in his time.
Article
Galen of Pergamum (AD 129–c.216) was the most influential doctor of later antiquity, whose work was to influence medical theory and practice for more than fifteen hundred years. He was a prolific writer on anatomy, physiology, diagnosis and prognosis, pulse-doctrine, pharmacology, therapeutics, and the theory of medicine; but he also wrote extensively on philosophical topics, making original contributions to logic and the philosophy of science, and outlining a scientific epistemology which married a deep respect for empirical adequacy with a commitment to rigorous rational exposition and demonstration. He was also a vigorous polemicist, deeply involved in the doctrinal disputes among the medical schools of his day. This volume offers an introduction to and overview of Galen's achievement in all these fields, while seeking also to evaluate that achievement in the light of the advances made in Galen scholarship over the past thirty years.
Article
Galen of Pergamum (AD 129-c. 200/c. 216), one of the most important physicians of the Roman nobility during the Second Sophistic, recombined the teachings of great medical scientists and philosophers such as Hippocrates, Plato and Aristotle. With such an eclectic stance, he was not just able to obtain an independent position in medical and philosophical discourses of his time, but also to create an innovative paradigm to understand and cure diseases of the human soul. Thus, the physician could react to one of the great existential challenges to human life by analysing the ancient concept of the soul and examining how the immaterial mind was related and connected to the material body. Thus, Galen set up a catalogue of norms and measures to respond to mental dysfunctions inflicted by (1) bodily disorder, (2) emo-tional disequilibrium and (3) neurotic affections, so called fixed ideas.
Article
We review the life and contributions of Claudius Galen from a 20th century perspective and examine his genitourinary observations. All obtainable English translations of Galen's works were explored in addition to relevant commentaries. Galen's remarkable observations and novel concepts expanded medical knowledge in general and contributed to fundamental genitourinary principles in particular. Galen was one of the first to describe correctly the function of kidneys and explain micturition. Among his many neologisms he coined the term ureter, and he was probably the first to recognize the value of a competent ureterovesical valve. Galen advocated catheterization for urinary obstruction. He was a teacher, practitioner and philosopher, and wrote voluminously. Galen's influence on medical theory, terminology and practice remained unquestioned in Europe and the Middle East throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance.