ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the use of principle-based analytic tools to improve community knowledge building in a class of Grade 5/6 students. A flexible design framework was used to engage students in use of three analytic tools - a Vocabulary Analyzer, a Social Network Tool, and a Semantic Overlap Tool. These tools are built into Knowledge Forum technology so principle-based assessment is integral to knowledge work. The primary source of data was discourse generated by students in Knowledge Forum over a school semester (approximately four months). Findings based on a mixed-methods analysis reveal principle-based knowledge building analytic tools to be effective in increasing the frequency with which key terms are used by individuals, in their own productive vocabulary as well as in the shared community space, thus creating a more discursively connected community. Results additionally show a shift from problem generation and breadth of inquiry to increased self-assessment, reflection, and depth of inquiry; also, students report significant ways in which knowledge building analytic tools can increase knowledge building capacity.
ѕѮ ŌǧΥʃ Ĭ҂ÌĜ'ġÏ҂ĭ'҂ ĂĀ҂
ŀƨʔ³/ʕη+ȶ 9͸9+9ǀ+/҂9҂ƉSȷ/ʖS/ň˟/S³҂
" ((" (
" ɔ»ˠʗ+҂ Ȭʄ"ˈȟ"Į҂555o"+"͹ȸ"ˡoT¢÷^TƩ"øTʅˉ"Ǩ»҂
 ( #!( ($ (% ((
&("('!( ( Ň҂Ž҂
 "Ƶ҂ΗÔ҂""ǁ""ǍÕ҂!"""
Éʼnϴų ʴȎЊͰТѴĎƃ¸ϗΝȹɿѐÊ
ǂ҂ůθŴūϊΨĐ ɣǏɉ҂ƹDZ҂ɺǷʵɹÖ҂ď҂˂҂Ɲʘɷ×҂Ńʦƪ҂
ǎ҂ŋ҂ŒǏДщΕΙåƊ҂ΐƒѳэΚæËɸÞβ
ǩ҂Żγʶȏ҂œϟιϙʋßƑLjΩαɐ
}Rƕšŷō҂ ŢſŔ҂
ĵϵвЕį
Ƈδɤ¾ħ҂ɗͳ҂ĝĢ҂
ƈǛ[¾҂Ⱥʙ҂ыŅʯ҂uī҂IJСͶĔûăy҂
ɚʞήź wzр ws'z҂
ϣưɾǃɥ˄гʠ Ğ҂ĶўЃĕütģ҂
ѨΖ
ΑÒ˙ãЧ
ΒШNjͼɳφɍ
ЉʍЂνȂǗʛ҂
NJ˝еöʆξƮǰЩčđ
АϚʢɴ¨ΓÓʹ
Ɔȧϡͱ
Ÿ҂ ŰχΛ
}ĺƋƖRıƗ҂
Ѐ I$ъQ XВ²΄҂ɑ҂¹Π¬˶ÄQ $,҂X҂˛ʫ¬çȭь :ʨǐ҂F҂҂\£IeʾБ
ǡϐɠ&ɦȅ ύžA Ɋ҂ ҂ >ƽ҂ X҂ś˳҂ ĤùĨ҂ ê҂ ij҂ ŎЄɅ(F Ɠ҂
ȚƱ_ȍ҂΁҂ $ѠÅм ²ђдѥЁQ Ȑ҂˷҂ :ʩÅУΟơˀ ϧƯɆ.
ĹΊǺˢM҂҂Ɣ҂ƀ҂Ɯɶн ƌʌ>҂ͺ:I҂Ąϔä ƙ,҂µ«ʂшϯ´ ɋ
&ɯȇ҂ř¤҂>ȴȪ҂҂ˊ¦ˋȀ(҂Ϲʡ¦´ ,҂ ȻµA°҂ ҂ɟ&Ȅ҂
&ˣəpϰˮ ҂,g˴҂҂κ΀ ɒ˅,҂ AȈ°҂ (Á҂,҂\H҂&и
ŕ҂ͽ҂;й« 4£ȋѣѱˌέŲǯ¤<2.Ș$e҂ʑZÐp҂Řȼ§҂ ;҂H҂҂ʓ
_ФΜϜ ˿Ѕţ JсǪd2è(; ɛ-ɮȢ҂ $Ƀ213C҂˫ПŤ.> ɲ҂¹҂ ҂ ȗчѼ
ͻώɌл1A ǻ҂ț϶¼?.&ÆёÁʰϛͷ .ГΪϨЌ24ôȽÄȾ®ˇ
IǤ҂Ͽѓ($Ͼ- ҂ť҂ ҂ 4Z˼҂?ʷʐͲ1҂4˗ϋѵΫ¼4 ȉѤтB ҂ʒǿ҂
]gɓ.҂?ʸʣǦ Ǡ¥ʤN҂Rϩ <^΅҂Z&҂҂]Ȟ҂ȝ_ίѭ¥ CHÂ
eζ©ʚу ˸ƫХÃȑȿʲλ13ǢΡ ȕѽѢʎ3Χ˽ȁàі dÆÃ1Â
˞ҁѪϞѡѻƍϘμ ˹d҂ɧƧŠH -<Ή҂҂-ЖЦŭ©ΎϷȆ $\ɨ]CјљΈ? ɢ2
ǖ3҂ʬ<҂ɜ-ɩDzȦ҂(g^ɀ§΢ą ˔;ǞN Ł҂ĖýĆĥ҂ŏ+џϪȊ Źë҂ķɪ҂®CȮϠ˺q
7c%҂ĻЍЎY҂҂ ˁ҂¯!҂ș)҂҂ˤʼǣÇ ƎƞƏњф ˜#҂Ȓ҂E҂ hϕ !΍
҂ k8ÈˬǴƸ* ~J#@˥L҂6xØ҂ 6|Ñr҂ 7ϭ) DŽσ ˯ǝˍѦ˖@¶ п á҂ ǑȲG@n҂ ҂
ʊ½Ƭ҂Džɕ!¶҂Eb҂#DW҂΃҂Yȯf҂Í8!¡ó҂8є˭ƴ*ƳĽf@˦Ù҂6|Kq҂ƚюÿѰ~EE҂І#
ȜƲ`Ȍ҂W˧҂73%)҂Ŗ±aψǕDcȫÇ҂ʪМŦ #¡҂lǜì҂Ĵћdz*LŜКű½h*ǒn ѯότFÝ6ĉxK
#·҂ J҂ )ȩϖεí· żз)hǫϝх U`*#·҂ UUɄ҂ ȓ҂ ҂ *҂ !DɱFY҂ ɝˆ҂5J҂
k8È˵ОѶЭкѷāmN
7c%ɫȣ҂Ś`҂;҂҂¢º҂ɞ%ɬ)҂!҂҂!aº҂adžο%˨ɘ%fD҂WƼ҂lŝȡѸϥɰɇL
ϦϼѹėćĠŞB ńɁâ҂҂ˎ¯mî҂ƐǬ0b҂0b˩҂҂π=¿=ɭ҂ˏLJG0ʇéʹG¿B҂ː=Ǔ҂Î=ϳ0%ѝЇ5G0Bŗ±ʈKÜ҂
Θņ˚ʏƶ҂ƾr҂ƁЯϺƷƄǚ҂ƠƂʿΔѩĘÚƦʥʜϤMƣ҂Ŋϑΰ
Ŭˑ[ uĊЈyÛƛͿоČò
 ϻǸѫȵʺŧЮİȃѧƢѬΣѾƥ şѲ
Ũ҂ ľНƤ ω ΏɡȤ҂njϒɎʱ҂ƭ˕˘ЗИʳϲªǥʝʟM ˃Ͻ Vɽ[жΤѺ΂͵҂ʁ҂Ǚ҂ÀɈЪЫŐ ȥʭǔυƿ
ǘάϮǼǵ ĿʀÀȰϏ˻ȖϱρȠ Ūї ƻ˒ϫȨЙЬƟʮɂ҂ªȔ҂ƘʻϸŵΞǶ ļΦɵVɏР˲ ƺV҂˓˱ũабЋljΆ
ƅϓ΋ ЛŶɻǽќЏ¨Ůʽʧï҂
ȱϢҀѿǹǭϬõ'PO'PvĩΌɖñǟʉяǮěP'ĦOςOþċĚ
ĪvğĈ{úłęst{҂őǾ˪҂ēĸ ˰ɼц˾ð
... Notification reminders for student action (Yilmaz, 2020;Tabuenca et al., 2015; Choice-based analytics (Chen & Zhang, 2016;Hong et al., 2015) Recommendations for actions (Yilmaz, 2020;Han et al., 2021;Zheng, Niu & Zhong, 2022;Tormey et al., 2020) ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Student-facing learning analytics has been gaining attention in educational research as it offers a promising approach to providing personalised feedback on students' online learning activities. However, there is limited understanding of the competencies required by students to effectively utilise this feedback and designs that can cultivate such competencies. This systematic review synthesises the competencies required for students to use learning analytics feedback effectively and scrutinises existing designs that facilitate the use of student-facing learning analytics, as delineated in 37 empirical studies. The review identified six key competencies that students need to use learning analytics: emotion regulation, sensemaking, evaluation, reflection, integration, and experimentation. Additionally, the review examined the designs of student-facing learning analytics and assessed the support provided for each competency. Altogether, the results show that existing studies tend to focus on the use of learning analytics without investigating students' ability and competencies in using them. A cross-analysis of learning analytics design and characteristics revealed gaps in learning analytics designs that cater to learners' emotion regulation. The review also highlights the importance of educators' role in facilitating students' use of learning analytics.
... building on each other's contributions) and ideas, based on semantic relationships (e.g. term co-occurrence) as well as how each evolves over time (Oshima et al., 2012). Discourse-focused analytics allow students to compare words used in their contributions with those used by others students, highlighted by experts or included in the curriculum, supporting greater discursive connection across the community (Chen & Liu, 2016;Hong et al., 2015). Finally, meta-discourse analytics support students in reflecting on community knowledge, for example to identify which ideas to develop further (see Promising Ideas Tool (integrated directly into Knowledge Forum) in Chen, et al., 2015 and a new analytic to computationally detect "promisingness" in Lee & Tan, 2017), or to look across themes, advances and gaps in a stream of related ideas (see Idea Thread Mapper (https://idea-thread.net) in Zhang et al., 2015). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
While much work in learning analytics focuses on understanding and supporting the individual learner, a great deal of learning activity happens in groups, offering opportunities to generate insight into joint learning practices. How learners interact with each other in support of learning has been a topic of rich theorization for some time, from early work on face-to-face cooperation to more recent attention focused on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). This chapter unpacks four different relationships between collaborative learning theory and learning analytics (Application, Testing/Refinement, Generation, and Implementation) by examining work related to theories of joint attention, online listening, and knowledge building. Considering the relationship between theory and analytics as mediated by elements of technology, pedagogy, epistemology, and data, the chapter offers guidance for selecting relevant collaborative learning theory for particular analytic uses and overviews central issues to be considered in such use (e.g. group versus individual units of analysis, leveraging constructs and/or process models, inclusion of temporality, appropriate audiences to interpret and act on analytic outputs).
... Indeed, ICTs are one of the most significant developments in half a century of research on teaching. Existing scholarship on the role of ICTs in teaching has oftentimes focused on the diverse ways in which technologies can help students achieve greater educational outcomes, and the obstacles towards achieving these ends (e.g., Hong, et al., 2015;Zhang, et al., 2011). In this article, we approach the topic from a different angle. ...
Article
Full-text available
Scholars and educators have puzzled for decades about how to provide K-12 teachers with the resources necessary to support and improve teaching. New information and communication technologies have opened up infinitely more possibilities, setting the stage for a renewed discussion about what teaching entails and how best to support it. In this conceptual article, we propose a theoretical framework to understand how on-line resources can support K-12 teaching, and apply this framework to three on-line platforms. Our analysis highlights several design tradeoffs that reflect deeper tensions surrounding teaching and the teaching profession, and that direct our attention to (1) teacher agency, (2) the required expertise and effort, (3) teacher community, (4) and the desired degree of oversight. These tradeoffs imply that designers should go beyond attending to technological tools, and engage also with fundamental questions concerning the nature of teaching and the teaching profession.
... And in this sense, carrying out classroom projects facilitates the reconstruction of the critical thinking process from students' experiential culture. Teachers try at all times to create a shared knowledge space in the classroom to facilitate the socialisation of learnings through negotiation, dialogue, participation, and decentralisation of knowledge (Hong et al., 2015;Palmgren-Neuvonen et al., 2021;Pérez Gómez, 1998;Reusser & Pauli, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Our contribution is based on the most noteworthy results of a research project focusing on teaching strategies at a time when the contents of the primary education curriculum are becoming digital. The expansion of the digital content industry is forcing a paradigm shift. In this paper we analyse the strategies implemented by teachers of the fifth and sixth year of primary school in relation with the digitisation of curricular content. With this aim, we planned our research following ethnographic methodology, analysing a period of two years of a case study. The main data collection tools we used are the analysis of the centre’s documents and website, semi-structured interviews with different participants, and direct observation of fifth and sixth year primary education classrooms. We can infer from the analysis that technology facilitates processes of inclusion in the centre, enhancing collaborative and cooperative work. Furthermore, the use of digital devices promotes attention to diversity. The implementation of digital technologies in schools implies redefining teaching practices and teaching-learning processes.The results show that the addition of digital materials is a step forward in the centre’s attention to diversity, improving accessibility and overcoming the digital gap thanks to schools’ access to technological resources.
... le Knowledge Forum (KF) (Scardamalia, 2004), fondé sur la théorie du Knowledge Building (Impedovo et Andreucci, 2016 ;Scardamalia et Bereiter, 2006). La littérature afférente détaille le fonctionnement des versions successives de l'outil (Hong et al., 2015 ;Laferrière et Lamon, 2010), mais reste centrée sur les collaborations entre élèves pour la reformulation des écrits, laissant de côté les interactions enseignants-élèves (Chan et Chan, 2011). Dans une revue de littérature portant sur ces interactions, Van de Pol et al. (2010) recensent les études montrant qu'au-delà de la question du caractère incrémental de la démarche, les retours formulés par les enseignants augmentent généralement les capacités d'autorégulation des élèves en plus de la qualité des écrits. ...
Article
Full-text available
Dans une perspective d’évaluation d’EIAH (environnements informatiques pour l’apprentissage humain), nous étudions dans cette recherche les changements de pratiques d’enseignement liés à l’utilisation, en contexte scolaire, du CNEC (carnet numérique de l’élève chercheur), une application numérique instrumentant la rédaction incrémentale entre l’enseignant et les élèves. Au prisme du concept de contradiction développé dans la théorie de l’activité d’Engeström, nous cherchons à appréhender les difficultés associées à la rédaction incrémentale. Pour cela, nous avons mené des groupes de discussion et des observations en classe, avant et après l’introduction de l’application. Nos résultats corroborent l’hypothèse selon laquelle, dans un contexte de démarche d’investigation, l’instrumentation numérique de cette approche permet de mieux réguler l’activité des élèves que l’instrumentation papier. Par ailleurs, les entretiens collectifs révèlent que le rapport que les élèves entretiennent aux erreurs s’en trouve modifié, la correction de celles-ci étant moins considérée comme une sanction. La nécessité pour l’enseignant d’investir davantage de temps dans la formulation des retours ainsi que la multiplication des instruments, avec une redondance partielle entre instruments papier et instruments numériques, permettent de croire que de nouvelles contradictions pourraient émerger avec l’utilisation d’un tel EIAH. Mots-clés : rédaction incrémentale, EIAH, évaluation, numérique
Article
This study examined students’ understanding of, and reflective inquiry into discourse, specifically their epistemic discourse understanding and meta-discourse, and investigated their roles and relationships in fostering productive inquiry in knowledge building. The participants comprised two classes of ninth grade visual arts students inquiring into art and design. The experimental class (n = 31) engaged in knowledge building using Knowledge Forum® (KF) enriched by meta-discourse involving reflective inquiry and classroom discussion about their discourse. The comparison class (n = 32) similarly worked on KF but using regular classroom discussion. Quantitative analysis indicated that the experimental group students, who engaged in meta-discourse, showed a deeper epistemic discourse understanding and domain knowledge than the comparison students, and that epistemic discourse understanding was associated with productive KF inquiry. Qualitative analysis of the classroom meta-discourse showed that metacognitive reflection, principle-based inquiry, and idea development (i.e., meta-epistemic reflection, meta-epistemic principles, and meta-epistemic theory) support epistemic understanding and productive inquiry. We also discuss the implications of using meta-discourse to enhance epistemic discourse understanding and productive inquiry for knowledge building and computer-supported collaborative learning.
Article
Critical thinking is one of the core twenty-first century skills. This study designs the strategy of peer assessment based on the theory of knowledge building to improve a class of 33 undergraduate students’ critical thinking skills in one semester. The context of knowledge building has four phases—idea generation, idea connection, idea improvement, and rising above—which are iterated by three rounds of peer assessment. In this study, the dependent variable was critical thinking skills, and the independent variable was peer assessment. Data sources include critical thinking skills surveyed, peer comments on Knowledge Forum and grades scored by students. The results showed that (1) students’ critical thinking skills were significantly improved; (2) students’ reports have risen in peer assessment; and (3) students’ critical thinking skills are significantly correlated with peer assessment in the knowledge-building community with both peer comments and peer grades. The findings indicated that knowledge building created a positive culture for the promotion of critical thinking skills, comments that expressed strong disagreement could improve students’ critical thinking skills, and the formation of community knowledge played a substantial role in promoting students’ critical thinking skills.
Chapter
Collaborative knowledge building has been an important pedagogical approach in K-12 and higher education. However, collaborative knowledge building cannot occur spontaneously and need to be guided by teachers. This study examined teacher scaffolding supported collaborative knowledge building practices in the online learning environment. Totally 94 undergraduate students participated in this study and they were randomly assigned into 12 experimental groups and 13 control groups. The teacher provided real-time guidance only for the experimental group to promote collaborative knowledge building. The control groups carried out knowledge building by themselves. The results indicated that there were significant differences in collaborative knowledge building and knowledge convergence between the experimental group and control group. The experimental group outperformed the control group in terms of collaborative knowledge building and knowledge convergence degree. The results together with the implications for teachers and practitioners are discussed in depth.
Article
Full-text available
Pressure for better measurement of stated learning outcomes has resulted in a demand for more frequent assessment. The resources available are seen to be static or dwindling, but Information and Communications Technology is seen to increase productivity by automating assessment tasks. This paper reviews computer-assisted assessment (CAA) and suggests future developments. A search was conducted of CAA-related literature from the past decade to trace the development of CAA from the beginnings of its large-scale use in higher education. Lack of resources, individual inertia and risk propensity are key barriers for individual academics, while proper resourcing and cultural factors outweigh technical barriers at the institutional level.
Article
Full-text available
Tagging-based systems enable users to categorize web resources by means of tags (freely chosen keywords), in order to re-finding these resources later. Tagging is implicitly also a social indexing process, since users share their tags and resources, constructing a social tag index, so-called folksonomy. At the same time of tagging-based system, has been popularised an interface model for visual information retrieval known as Tag-Cloud. In this model, the most frequently used tags are displayed in alphabetical order. This paper presents a novel approach to Tag-Cloud's tags selection, and proposes the use of clustering algorithms for visual layout, with the aim of improve browsing experience. The results suggest that presented approach reduces the semantic density of tag set, and improves the visual consistency of Tag-Cloud layout.
Article
This study explored how students viewed the role of ideas for knowledge work and how such view was related to their inquiry activities. Data mainly came from students' online interaction logs, group discussion and inquiry, and a survey concerning the role of ideas for knowledge work. The findings suggest that knowledge building was conducive to developing among students a more informed view of ideas that sees ideas as improvable, real-world objects for collaborative and creative knowledge work, rather than merely as abstract thoughts for achieving an individual's own knowledge acquisition. Moreover, it was found that how a group views the role of ideas was associated with how they improve the quality of the ideas during their group inquiry.
Book
With an increasing emphasis on creativity and innovation in the twenty-first century, teachers need to be creative professionals just as students must learn to be creative. And yet, schools are institutions with many important structures and guidelines that teachers must follow. Effective creative teaching strikes a delicate balance between structure and improvisation. The authors draw on studies of jazz, theater improvisation and dance improvisation to demonstrate that the most creative performers work within similar structures and guidelines. By looking to these creative genres, the book provides practical advice for teachers who wish to become more creative professionals.