Measuring Creative Imagery Abilities

Article (PDF Available)inFrontiers in Psychology 6(1591) · October 2015with 896 Reads
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591
Cite this publication
Abstract
Over the decades, creativity and imagination research developed in parallel, but they surprisingly rarely intersected. This paper introduces a new theoretical model of creative imagination, which bridges creativity and imagination research, as well as presents a new psychometric instrument, called the Test of Creative Imagery Abilities (TCIA), developed to measure creative imagery abilities understood in accordance with this model. Creative imagination is understood as constituted by three interrelated components: vividness (the ability to create images characterized by a high level of complexity and detail), originality (the ability to produce unique imagery), and transformativeness (the ability to control imagery). TCIA enables valid and reliable measurement of these three groups of abilities, yielding the general score of imagery abilities and at the same time making profile analysis possible. We present the results of nine studies on a total sample of more than 1,700 participants, showing the factor structure of TCIA using confirmatory factor analysis, as well as provide data confirming this instrument’s validity and reliability. The availability of TCIA for interested researchers may result in new insights and possibilities of integrating the fields of creativity and imagination science.
Figures - uploaded by Maciej Karwowski
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Maciej Karwowski
Content may be subject to copyright.
Measuring Creative Imagery Abilities
Dorota M. Jankowska1, Maciej Karwowski1*
1Department of Educational Sciences, Academy of Special Education, Poland
Submitted to Journal:
Frontiers in Psychology
Specialty Section:
Cognition
ISSN:
1664-1078
Article type:
Original Research Article
Received on:
06 Jul 2015
Accepted on:
02 Oct 2015
Provisional PDF published on:
02 Oct 2015
Frontiers website link:
www.frontiersin.org
Citation:
Jankowska DM and Karwowski M(2015) Measuring Creative Imagery Abilities. Front. Psychol. 6:1591.
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591
Copyright statement:
© 2015 Jankowska and Karwowski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other
forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original
publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use,
distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance, after peer-review. Fully formatted PDF
and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon.
Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org
Provisional
New Test of Creative Imagination 1
RUNNING HEAD: New Test of Creative Imagination
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Measuring Creative Imagery Abilities
12
13
Dorota M. Jankowska, Maciej Karwowski
14
Academy of Special Education, Poland
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Authors’ Note and Acknowledgement
42
Dorota M. Jankowska, Maciej Karwowski, Department of Educational Sciences,
43
Academy of Special Education, Szczesliwicka St., 40, 02353 Warsaw, Poland.
44
Please address correspondence to Maciej Karwowski (mackar@aps.edu.pl).
45
The study was supported by a grant from the National Science Center, Poland [grant
46
number UMO 2011/03/N/HS6/05153].
47
48
Provisional
New Test of Creative Imagination 2
Abstract
49
Over the decades, creativity and imagination research developed in parallel, but they
50
surprisingly rarely intersected. This paper introduces a new theoretical model of creative
51
visual imagination, which bridges creativity and imagination research, as well as presents a
52
new psychometric instrument, called the Test of Creative Imagery Abilities (TCIA),
53
developed to measure creative imagery abilities understood in accordance with this model.
54
Creative imagination is understood as constituted by three interrelated components: vividness
55
(the ability to create images characterized by a high level of complexity and detail),
56
originality (the ability to produce unique imagery), and transformativeness (the ability to
57
control imagery). TCIA enables valid and reliable measurement of these three groups of
58
abilities, yielding the general score of imagery abilities and at the same time making profile
59
analysis possible. We present the results of nine studies on a total sample of more than 1,700
60
participants, showing the factor structure of TCIA using confirmatory factor analysis, as well
61
as provide data confirming this instrument’s validity and reliability. The availability of TCIA
62
for interested researchers may result in new insights and possibilities of integrating the fields
63
of creativity and imagination science.
64
65
Keywords: creative imagination, vividness, originality, transformativeness, TCIA
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Provisional
New Test of Creative Imagination 3
1. Introduction
74
Imagination pervades human experience. The activity of visual imagination encompasses
75
creating, interpreting, and transforming vivid mental representations (Thompson, Hsiao, &
76
Kosslyn, 2011). Its creative function, which stems from engagement in the creative process, is
77
most often discussed in connection with the imaginary games of childhood (Hoff, 2005;
78
Singer & Singer, 1992) as well as artistic and scientific work (Root-Bernstein, 2014;
79
Rothenberg, 1995). However, the belief that creative imagination is one of the major human
80
abilities contributing to the effective use of the creative potential (Runco, Nemiro, &
81
Walberg, 1998) is not a matter of recent years only. The first documented study on
82
imagination was conducted among scientists nearly one and a half centuries ago (Galton,
83
1880), and with the development of research on creativity test instruments measuring visual
84
creative imagination were created. However, the existing tests do not take into account the
85
complexity of creative imagination, which became an impulse for developing the Test of
86
Creative Imagery Abilities (TCIA), whose theoretical assumptions as well as selected aspects
87
of validity and reliability we present in this paper. The instrument we propose enables profile
88
analysis of visual creative imagination, thereby treating imagination as a complex and
89
multidimensional disposition comprising specific characteristics (vividness, originality,
90
transformative ability) distinguished in the conjunctional model of creative imaging ability. In
91
this model, creative imagination is defined as ability to create and transform representations
92
that are based on the material of past observations but that significantly transcend them by
93
creating the so-called creative representations (see Dziedziewicz & Karwowski, 2015) (Figure
94
1). Although creative imagination understood in this way is part of the broad construct of
95
creative cognition (Finke, Ward, & Smith, 1992), we perceive creative imagination in a more
96
narrow way, than we do creative cognition.
97
---------- Insert Figure 1 Here --------
98
99
1.1.Problems with Measures of Creative Imagination
100
Test-based research on creativity originated with Guilfords (1950) theory of divergent
101
thinking. With time, Guilfords proposals of tasks measuring the characteristics of divergent
102
thinking gave rise to numerous tests, such as the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT;
103
Torrance, 1974) or Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement (TCAM; Torrance, 1981).
104
For many years, this tradition of creativity research remained the dominant approach. And
105
even though imagination measurement in psychology and related sciences has a longer
106
tradition than research on divergent thinking (Galton, 1880), it was the post-Guilfordian
107
orientation that exerted considerable influence on the testing of creative imagination, not the
108
other way around. The influence was so strong that the contribution of creative imagination
109
was included in the first tests for the assessment of divergent thinking, an example being the
110
“Imaginative Stories Task” in the Minnesota Test of Creative Thinking (MCTC; Goldman,
111
1965; Torrance, 1962), the original version of TCAM. The combination of these abilities in
112
divergent thinking resulted in a blurring of the concept of imagination, previously well
113
defined in the literature. Interestingly, many questionnaires for exploring visual imagination
114
were developed in parallel (e.g., Marks, 1973; Sheehan, 1967), measuring mainly the
115
following: (1) imagery vividness the clarity, complexity, and elaboration of the imagery
116
generated; (2) imagery control the ability to manipulate the imagery generated; and (3)
117
imagery style a preference for imagery-based or verbal strategies of encoding and
118
processing information (MacInnis, 1987). The assessment criteria in the newly developed test
119
measures were nearly identical with those in typical divergent thinking tests, for example:
120
flexibility, elaboration, originality, asymmetry, and abstraction in the Franck Drawing
121
Completion Test (FDCT; Anastasi & Schaefer, 1971), flexibility, elaboration, and originality
122
in the Visual Imagination Test (VIT; McHenry & Shouksmith, 1970), or flexibility and
123
Provisional
New Test of Creative Imagination 4
originality in the Creative Imagination Test (CIT; Schubert, 1973). On the other hand, the
124
influence of Guilfordian tests on the practice of testing and creative imagination assessment
125
may not be so obvious as it is described to be. Long before Guilford's (1950) famous address,
126
which gave impulse to the development of creativity psychology, Simpson (1922) presented
127
the Test for Creative Imagination (Visual), in which the counterpart of transformativeness
128
was the creative changes indicator, which was the prototype for the flexibility of thinking.
129
This measure was computed based on the product of the number of all the drawings produced
130
in the test and the number of changes between the drawings (i.e., the number of transition
131
moments between different categories). It can therefore be supposed that first definitions of
132
imagery transformation ability were positioned within the area of meanings and their
133
interpretations, just like the flexibility of thinking.
134
With time, many empirical studies appeared that demonstrated a weak relationship
135
between imagination and divergent thinking (Campos & Gonzalez, 1993; Campos & Pérez,
136
1989; Parrott & Strongman, 1985), which is confirmed by the meta-analysis summing up
137
these studies (LeBoutillier & Marks, 2003). It therefore became justified to treat these
138
constructs as distinct and relatively independent components of creativity, each having its
139
own measurement specificity. Nevertheless, the influence of the post-Guilfordian tradition
140
was still so strong that even after the publication of the Test of Creative Thinking by Jellen
141
and Urban (TCT-DP; Jellen & Urban, 1986), which, in some sense, overcame the dominance
142
of the Guilfordian approach in thinking about creativity, the scoring criteria in new creative
143
imagination tests were still a reproduction of fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration.
144
For instance, in Prueba de Imaginación Creativa (PIC; Barraca, Poveda, Artola, Mosteino,
145
Sanchez, & Ancillo, 2004) five scales were distinguished, of which four are repetitions of the
146
components of divergent thinking: fluency of ideas, flexibility of thinking, originality of the
147
responses, elaboration of the responses, and use of creative details (color, shadows,
148
expansiveness, rotations, new perspectives). And while references to fluency, which can be
149
linked with the generativity (fertility) of imagination, are to some extent justifiable, defining
150
the originality of the generated imagery in terms of the rarity of their occurrence is an
151
erroneous oversimplification that results from copying the scoring criteria for divergent
152
thinking. The creative aspect of imagery manifests itself in generating new ideas and
153
hypotheses, which are rare by nature, but above all they are innovative (Magid, Sheskin, &
154
Schulz, 2015; Ward, 1994). This way of thinking about the originality of imagery is visible in
155
the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI; Karwowski, 2008a, 2008b), where the participant's
156
task is to imagine and draw schematic drawings representing something that does not exist
157
but, in the participant's opinion, should exist.
158
Reproducing the scoring criteria for divergent in creative imagination tests resulted in
159
the similarity of test tasks. For example, the FDCT matrix is almost an exact copy of the
160
matrix in the figural part of TTCT Picture Completion. The situation is similar in the case of
161
PIC and the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI, Ren, Li, Zhang, & Wang, 2012). They all
162
consist of incomplete figures to be completed and captioned, the difference being that FDCT
163
has 12 figures, PIC has 4, and in TTCT and TCI there are 10 of them. This is undoubtedly a
164
reference to the Sketches Test, in which the participant is given a simple basic figure, such as
165
a circle, that he or she is supposed to complement in such a way as to produce a recognizable
166
sign (Guilford & Hoepfner, 1966). A similarity is also observable in verbal tasks. In the
167
version of PIC that is intended for children, the tasks in the verbal part require describing: (1)
168
the possible consequences of all squirrels turning into dinosaurs, (2) new applications of
169
plastic pipes, and (3) various endings of a situation presented in a picture. In the verbal part of
170
the TCI, participants generate alternative endings for a briefly outlined story. It is not difficult
171
to notice that these are typical tasks from the Remote Consequences Tests of the Unusual
172
Uses Tests (Guilford, 1967). However, they are not always a copy of Guilford's tasks. In the
173
Provisional
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Darya Zabelina
      Darya Zabelina
    • David Condon
      David Condon
    Recent findings in psychological research have begun to illuminate cognitive and neural mechanisms of imagination and mental imagery, and have highlighted its essential role for a number of important outcomes, including outcomes relevant for the study of psychopathology and psychotherapy. Scientific study of imagination, however, has been constrained by the virtue of being framed mainly as an ability for mental imagery. Here we propose that imagination is a widespread phenomenon that we all engage in, and which affects a wide range of important outcomes beyond more commonly studied constructs like creativity. Thus, the Four-Factor Imagination Scale (FFIS) focuses on features of the imaginative process, and measures imagination in terms of individual differences in those features, including frequency, complexity, emotional valence, and directedness of imagination. Study 1 consisted of construct elicitation and generation of a large pool of candidate survey items. Study 2 (N = 378) conducted exploratory quantitative analysis on the preliminary pool of candidate items in a larger sample, revealing four distinct factors of the designed items. Study 3 (N = 10,410) confirmed the structure of the preliminary items, and reported internal consistency and unidimensionality, as well as convergent and discriminant validity of the resultant scales. The FFIS confirms that imagination is multi-faceted in nature, and is better approached as a constellation of more narrowly measurable constructs.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Puwati Suprapto
      Puwati Suprapto
    • Zubair Ahmad
      Zubair Ahmad
    • Diki Muhamad Chaidir
      Diki Muhamad Chaidir
    • Dea Diella
      Dea Diella
    This research intended to know how the spatial intelligence and students' achievement support the creativity of prospective student teachers. This study was conducted on the subject of plant anatomy with visuospatial-based learning. The visuospatial-based learning model used in this study is called the wimba learning model. The method of this research was a quantitative /quasi-experiment with the pre- and post-test group design. The population was fourth-semester students in four classes of Biology Education who took Plant Anatomy course in 2017 in a university situated a small town, West Java, Indonesia. The sample of this research was two classes picked using the purposive sampling regarding their homogenous sampling of having the same relative ability. The treatments for each class was that the use of the deductive and inductive approach. The variables measured were spatial intelligence, students’ achievement and creativity of TCIA (Test of Creative Imagery Abilities). The data processing adopting multiple correlation tests with SPSS was to see the relationship between the variables. The results showed that spatial intelligence and students’ achievement could support creativity at a moderate level, indicated by the value of Rdeductive = 0,451 and Rinductive = 0,474, Rinductive > Rdeductive, which meant that the inductive approach was better to support creativity. In conclusion, spatial intelligence and students’ achievement could support creativity, especially the inductive approach. The results of this study could be useful to improve the creativity of prospective biology teachers.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Anna Oleszkiewicz
      Anna Oleszkiewicz
    Nowadays many human interactions take place in the virtual environment. To express emotions and attitudes in computer-mediated communication (CMC) individuals use emoticons - graphic representations of emotions and ideas. Contemporary applications serving computer-mediated communication (CMC) are provided with a broad spectrum of emoticons which may be used in communication. Variety of emoticons gives users of CMC an opportunity to create unique messages and express emotions in a creative manner. This study involved 275 online respondents and aimed to verify whether the frequency of emoticons use may be predicted by the three characteristics of creativity (creative abilities, openness, independence). Bayesian regression analysis showed that creativity does not predict frequency of emoticons use in CMC. No correspondence between creativity and frequency of emoticons use may be explained by pragmatic function of emoticons as they are used to communicate efficiently with an emphasis on the sender-recipient shared understanding of the emoticons meaning. What is more, robust popularity of communication applications leads to widespread employment of emoticons by CMC users. Therefore, with growing number of emoticons users’ creative individuals may seek less common means of expressing own creativity.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Antonio Esparza
    • Ricardo Sosa
      Ricardo Sosa
    • Andy M. Connor
    Studies of product architecture identify a mirroring process between the product and the organisation. Parallel, empirical studies of effectual entrepreneurship show an accumulation of commitments between stakeholders while negotiating the features of the product in a similar fashion to product mirroring. This paper presents a study that looks at the effects of mirroring architectural complexity in early stages of entrepreneurship. The survey asked participants to interpret parametrically generated artefacts with the purpose of starting a new firm. Responses were analysed for complexity in the lexical semantic structure of ideas. Results show that the effects of artefact complexity are not as straightforward as hypothesised and provide evidence that suggests an important role of artefact morphology in entrepreneurial ideation. These findings support a model of product architecture mirroring that is filtered by design morphology.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Natacha Mendes
    • Sabine Oligschläger
    • Mark Edgar Lauckner
      Mark Edgar Lauckner
    • Daniel S Margulies
      Daniel S Margulies
    The dataset enables exploration of higher-order cognitive faculties, self-generated mental experience, and personality features in relation to the intrinsic functional architecture of the brain. We provide multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and a broad set of state and trait phenotypic assessments: mind-wandering, personality traits, and cognitive abilities. Specifically, 194 healthy participants (between 20 and 75 years of age) filled out 31 questionnaires, performed 7 tasks, and reported 4 probes of in-scanner mind-wandering. The scanning session included four 15.5-min resting-state functional MRI runs using a multiband EPI sequence and a hig h-resolution structural scan using a 3D MP2RAGE sequence. This dataset constitutes one part of the MPI-Leipzig Mind-Brain-Body database.
  • Article
    • Maciej Karwowski
      Maciej Karwowski
    • Ronald A. Beghetto
    This article introduces and empirically explores a theoretical model of creative behavior as agentic action (CBAA). According to this model, transforming creative potential into creative behavior results from a decision informed by one’s creative confidence and perceived value of creativity. More specifically, the model posits that the link between creative potential and creative behavior is mediated by creative confidence and moderated by perceived value of creativity. We tested the model in two cross-sectional studies and in one longitudinal study. Across all three studies, we found evidence in support of the CBAA model. Implications for subsequent theory development and research are discussed.
  • Article
    • Dorota M. Jankowska
      Dorota M. Jankowska
    • Iwona Omelanczuk
      Iwona Omelanczuk
    • Marta Czerwonka
      Marta Czerwonka
    • Maciej Karwowski
      Maciej Karwowski
    This study examined relationships between creativity and subclinical autistic traits in a sample of students. The links between autistic traits and cognitive (performance-based) and personality-related (self-reported) creativity were assessed by means of structural equation modeling. It was demonstrated that while the latent factor of creativity composed of self-report scales was negatively linked to autistic traits, the latent factor of cognitive creativity was positively related to them. A follow-up analysis with the focus on people whose scores classified them as having broad autism phenotype (BAP) and matched controls selected on a basis of propensity score matching demonstrated that while personality-related factor of creativity was negatively linked to the likelihood of being classified as BAP, cognitively-related creativity was not related to BAP. We discuss the reasons for unsystematic links between creativity and autism, focusing on potential sources of variability that stem from self-reported versus performance-based measures of creativity and from the possibility of non-linear links between these characteristics.
  • Article
    • Dorota M. Jankowska
      Dorota M. Jankowska
    • Aleksandra Gajda
      Aleksandra Gajda
    • Maciej Karwowski
      Maciej Karwowski
    This article explores how creative visual imagination and creative thinking can help children to construct mental models of space. A mixed-method study, integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches and involving 98 five-year-old children (54 girls and 44 boys) demonstrated that creative visual imagination, rather than creative thinking, is linked with the knowledge and understanding of space. These results support the notion that creative visual imagination contributes to improvements in children's understanding of basic astronomical concepts. Interestingly, creative thinking was not associated with understanding and knowledge of cosmic phenomena in models taking into account creative imagination. The qualitative analysis showed differences in children's representations of space. We discuss the consequences of these findings for science education, particularly the teaching of elementary astronomy.
  • Book
    • Anna Abraham
    Cambridge Core - Cognition - The Neuroscience of Creativity - by Anna Abraham
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Raffaella Nori
      Raffaella Nori
    • Stefania Signore
      Stefania Signore
    • Paola Bonifacci
      Paola Bonifacci
    Psychometric and emotional intelligence are considered as two separate theoretical constructs, although each one has been found to correlate to a certain degree with measures of creativity. The aim of the present study was to analyze whether individual differences such as age and gender, together with psychometric intelligence and emotional competence (EC) predicted creativity. We selected a sample of 376 participants aged 12–88 (mean age = 30.28 years, SD = 19.09 years; 224 females) to evaluate relationships between these constructs across lifespan. Participants were administered the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-2, the Short Profile of EC, the Creativity Style Questionnaire Revised (CSQ-R) and the Creative Achievement Questionnaire (CAQ). T-test on gender differences evidenced that males had higher creativity achievements compared to females. A path analysis was applied to examine the relationships between the CAQ and CSQ-R scores as dependent variables and the potential predictors assessed. Results showed that CSQ-R was significantly predicted by interpersonal emotional competence and marginally by educational level (p = 0.058) and intrapersonal emotional competence (p = 0.051). On the other hand, the CAQ score was significantly predicted by gender, age, and composite IQ. Discussion is focused on possible theoretical implications.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Nicholas Leboutillier
      Nicholas Leboutillier
    • David F Marks
      David F Marks
    The reports of many creative individuals suggest the use of mental imagery in scientii c and artistic production. A variety of protocols have tested the association between mental imagery and creativity, but the individual differences approach has been most frequently employed. This approach is assessed here through a range of meta-analytic tests. Database searches revealed 18 papers employing the individual differences approach that were subjected to a conservative set of selection criteria. Nine studies (1,494 participants) were included in the nal analyses. A marginal, but statistically signii cant, Fisher's Z-transformed correlation coef cient was revealed. Further analyses showed little difference between form and type of self-reported imagery and divergent thinking. Explanations for the failure to account for more than 3% of the variance in the data sets are discussed in the context of anecdotal reports, task validity, and design problems.
  • Book
    • Ronald A. Finke
    • Thomas B. Ward
      Thomas B. Ward
    • Steven M. Smith
      Steven M. Smith
  • Article
    • Maciej Karwowski
      Maciej Karwowski
    There are many controversies with the psychometric approach to study human creativity. Many scholars doubt it is possible to discover something as delicate as creativity using standardized tests (e.g. Baer, 1993/1994, Hocevar, 1981). However, research shows that creativity tests are valid, reliable and predictive (Plucker, 1999, Plucker, Runco, 1998, Plucker, Renzulli, 1999). The article presents a new instrument to measure creative potential - especially creative imagination. This instrument called TCI - Test of Creative Imagination - looks effective, culture-fair, reliable and valid, which makes it useful for an individual diagnosis of creativity as well as for scientific studies.
  • Article
    • Izabela Lebuda
    This article reports a meta-analysis of the relationships between creative self-beliefs (CSBs)-a broad set of characteristics including creative self-efficacy, creative personal identity, and self-rated creativity-and the Big Five (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) as well as the Huge Two (plasticity and stability) personality traits. A review of the literature identified 25 independent studies and more than 80 correlations per personality factor; these were analyzed using a 3-level meta-analysis model. Openness was consistently the strongest predictor of CSBs (r = .467; 95% CI: .402, .531), followed by Extraversion (r = .264; 95% CI: .225, .304), Conscientiousness (r = .133; 95% CI: .061, .204), Neuroticism (r = -.124; 95% CI: -.184, -.064), and Agreeableness (r = .070; 95% CI: .006, .134). These effects were moderated by CSB type; more specifically, the relationships were stronger for domain-general than for domain-specific measures of CSBs. A meta-analytical structural equation model demonstrated that Plasticity was strongly positively correlated with CSBs (β = .71), whereas Stability was a negative predictor (β = -.23). We discuss whether the relationship between personality and CSBs is causal or correlational and consider the discriminant validity of CSBs as currently defined. (PsycINFO Database Record
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Maciej Karwowski
      Maciej Karwowski
    • Izabela Lebuda
      Izabela Lebuda
  • Article
    • K.K. Urban
    The Test for Creative Thinking - Drawing Production (TCT-DP), its design, concept and evaluation scheme as well as experiences and results of application are described. The test was designed to mirror a more holistic concept of creativity than the mere quantitatively oriented, traditional divergent thinking tests. The specific design using figural fragments is explained. The drawing production is evaluated by means of a set of criteria, which at the same time represent the underlying test construct. The test has been normed with various age and ability groups; there were no significant differences between male and female subjects. Various studies with data concerning the reliability and validity of the TCT-DP are provided.
  • Article
    • F. Galton