Conference PaperPDF Available

Ketogenic diet and prolonged fasting improve health-related quality of life and lipid profiles in multiple sclerosis –A randomized controlled trial

Authors:
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Ketone bodies may mediate neuroprotection. Ketone oxidation is compensated by equal reduction in glucose oxidation in the brain under prolonged fasting (PF) or ketogenic diet (KD) conditions. KD and prolonged effectively fasting modulate the immune system in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. We show that PF or KD ameliorate health-related quality of life (QOL) and blood lipid measures in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
Markus Bock MD1,2,3; Andreas Michalsen MD4; Friedemann Paul MD1,2
Ketogenic diet and prolonged fasting improve health-related quality of life and
lipid profiles in multiple sclerosis A randomized controlled trial
Methods
RCT and parallel-group 6-month pilot study after ethical committee
approval (NCT 01538355). 60 RRMS patients were recruited from July
2011 to August 2012. The patients received disease modifying therapy
or no immunomodulatory treatment. Ketonuria-/aemia was monitored.
One group received a usual diet, another group enhanced their diet
with an initial 7-day fasting episode. A third group received KD from
the outset. We used MS-54 self-assessment questionnaires and
measured the blood lipid profiles.
1Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
2NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
3Integrative Proteomics and Metabolomics, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Berlin, Germany
4Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Conclusions
PF and KD are feasible in RRMS patients. QOL and lipid profile improve
with KD and PF. KD has a sustainable, specific effect on LDL/HDL ratio and
triglycerides, which may be associated with disease progression. KD and PF
could favorably influence RRMS outcomes when coupled with conventional
treatments.
Background
Ketone bodies may mediate neuroprotection. Ketone oxidation is
compensated by equal reduction in glucose oxidation in the brain
under prolonged fasting (PF) or ketogenic diet (KD) conditions. KD and
prolonged effectively fasting modulate the immune system in
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. We show that PF or KD
ameliorate health-related quality of life (QOL) measures in relapsing
remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
Data are mean + SD, or median with inter quartile range or number (percent); baseline
data were available for 48 patients deviations are given in brackets; *Kruskal Wallis
test for comparison between the three groups was performed.
Hypothesis
KD and PF improve the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MS-54)
scale in RRMS patients.
Corresponding Author: markus.bock@charite.de
Results
Mean quality of life score
PHCS
MHCS
SXF
HD
OQL
CF
PF
HP
E/F
RP
P
SoF
EW
RE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80 Patients with MS present study Patients with MS US-study1
Month
Mean Change from Baseline
Physical Health Composite (MS-54)
1
3
6
0
5
10
15
Month
Mean Change from Baseline
Mental Health Composite (MS-54)
1
3
6
-5
0
5
10
15
Control Diet Prolonged Fasting Ketogenic Diet
Month
Mean Change from Baseline
Bodily Pain (MS-54)
1
3
6
-10
0
10
20
30
Month
Mean Change from Baseline
LDL/HDL Cholesterol Ratio
0
1
3
6
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2 Control Diet Prolonged Fasting Ketogenic Diet
Month
Mean Change from Baseline
Triglycerides (mg/dl)
0
1
3
6
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Fig. 2 a-d Longitudinal MS-54 changes
a
b
c d
Fig. 3 a+b
In comparison
to control
group the LDL
/ HDL ratio and
triglycerides
decreased
significantly in
the KD group
only. *p<0.05,
**p<0.01 Mann
Whitney-U
test was
performed to
compare the
mean change
from baseline
between the
control group
and the PF or
KD groups.
Fig. 1 Representative baseline values on MS-54
Comparison of the mean MS-54 scores of patients from the present study to US MS
patients1. Abbreviations: PHCS= physical health composite, MHCS= mental health
composite, SXF= sexual function, HD= health distress, OQL= overall quality of life,
CF=cognitive function, PF=physical function, HP= health perception, E/F= energy / fatigue,
RP= role limitations physical, P= bodily pain, SoF= social function, EW= emotional well-
being. RE= role limitations emotional. 1 Vickrey et al. (1995)
Fig. 2 a-d
PF and KD improve
summary (a+b) and
single (b+c) MS-54
scores in MS Patients.
MS-54 data are
mean+SEM. Dotted line
represents threshold
which is thought to be a
clinically meaningful gain
(>5 points) in MS-54
outcome. *p<0.05,
**<0.01 Mann-Whitney-U
test was performed to
compare the mean
change from baseline
between the control
group and the PF or KD
groups. In PF a
maximum effect size was
found at month 3 (0.8)
and in KD at month 6
(0.7).
Fig. 3 a+b Longitudinal blood lipid changes
a
b
Tab. 1 Patients baseline
characteristics Total
(n=48) SD
IQR Control
(n=12) SD
IQR Fasting
(n=18) SD
IQR Ketogenic
(n=18) SD
IQR *p-
value
Age in years 44.8 10.4 50.5 10.4 44.4 11.1 41.3 8.2 ns
Gender F/M 38/10
(79/21)
9/3
(75/25) 15/3
(83/17) 14/4
(78/22) ns
Expanded disability status score 3.0 2,0-4 2.5 1,5-4 4.0 2,4-4 3.0 2,4-3,5
ns
Disease Duration in years 8.9 7.3 9.9 9.2 11.0 7.7 6.3 4.3 ns
Relapse rate 12 months prior
study outset 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 ns
No immunomodulatory treatment 11 (23)
3 (35) 2 (11) 6 (33) ns
Glatirameracetate 15 (31)
7 (58) 6 (33) 2 (11) <0.05
Interferon beta 1a 9 (19) 1 (8) 6 (33) 2 (11) ns
Interferon beta 1b 3 (6) 0.0 1 (6) 2 (11) ns
Fingolimod 4 (8) 0.0 1 (6) 3 (17) ns
Natalizumab 4 (8) 1 (8) 1 (6) 2 (11) ns
Intravenous immuneglobulin 2 (4) 0.0 1 (6) 1 (6) ns
BMI 26.7 5.5 27.3 6.9 26.0 4.8 26.9 5.3 ns
Percent Body Fat 36.6 10.4 38.0 10.6 35.7 9.9 36.5 11.3 ns
Physical Health Composite;
(n=12,13,13) 67.4 15.2 73.1 8.8 59.6 15.6 69.9 15.2 ns
Mental Health Composite;
(n=12,17,15) 71.1 16.8 75.4 13.6 64.2 19.1 75.5 14.7 ns
Total Cholesterol, mg/dl 203.5 32.1 220.8 28.7 209.7 27.0 198.6 41.4 ns
Low Density Lipoprotein, mg/dl 124.3 32.1 129.8 31.1 126.3 25.5 119.7 36.7 ns
High Density Lipoprotein, mg/dl 68.1 17.8 69.9 17.1 62.9 17.9 62.1 18.1 ns
LDL/HDL ratio 2.0 0.8 2.0 0.9 2.2 0.8 2.1 0.8 ns
Triglycerides, mg/dl 89.3 42.9 105.1 43.2 111.1 48.2 87.2 36.4 ns
Month
Mean Change from Baseline
Physical Function (MS-54)
1
3
6
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
... The results showed a large effect on disability (P < 0.001, ES: -7.89), and relapse rate (RR) (P = 0.030, ES: 9.23) was reduced ( Table 2). 15 Ketogenic and fasting diets: Two articles that evaluated the efficacy of ketogenic and fasting diets in MS patients are available in table 1. 16,17 Choi et al. examined the effects of 2 dietary interventions, including the ketogenic diet (KD) and the fasting-mimic diet (FMD) in comparison with the German diet (GD) as the control group over a 6-month period in MS patients. 16 The KD group had a daily consumption of less than 50 grams of carbohydrates, less than 100 grams of proteins, and more than 160 grams of fats. ...
... 16 Bock et al. compared the impact of prolonged fasting (PF) or KD in MS patients with the usual diet as the control group. 17 There were several stages of the PF diet, including a 2-day low-calorie vegetarian diet, 7-day intensive fasting (vegetable with 200-350 kcal), a 3-day low-calorie vegetarian diet, and one, every day, week-long, 14-hour per day fast for the remaining study period. The PF and KD meaningfully affected QOL with large ES (ES: 0.7 to 0.8) ( Table 2). ...
... The PF and KD meaningfully affected QOL with large ES (ES: 0.7 to 0.8) ( Table 2). 17 Modified Paleolithic diet: We found one study that investigated the modified Paleolithic diet (MPD) in MS patients (Tables 1 and 2). 19 The MPD is a diet rich in vegetables and fruits (9 cups per day) and nuts while it is poor in legumes, dairy products, sugar, processed foods, oils, and foods containing gluten such as grains, and includes a moderate intake of meats. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: A growing number of clinical trials have investigated the role of diet in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. We systematically reviewed the literature for clinical trials to assess the impact of different kinds of diets on MS-related outcomes. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for relevant studies published before July 2019. The clinical trials included a defined dietary intervention and MS outcomes, including fatigue, relapse rate (RR), quality of life (QOL), and disability. Results: In the present review, 15 trials on 669 MS patients were included. The 2 plant-based diet trials, 1 was low-fat and the other was low-calorie, included in the review showed a large effect (ES: 0.6 to 0.7) on fatigue compared to the regular diet. The other plant-based diet was a low-protein diet and showed moderate to large effects on disability and RR compared to the Western diet. Moreover, 2 studies showed the clinically meaningful effects of the ketogenic diet (KD) on QOL and disability compared to the regular diet. In addition, 2 studies compared fish oil (FO) to placebo and found a small effect on disability (ES: 0.1 to 0.3). There were 2 studies that evaluated evening primrose oil and hemp seed oil and showed medium to large effect (ES: 0.7 to 1.5) on RR compared to olive oil. Finally, we found 2 studies that showed high flavonoid cocoa had a moderate effect (ES: 0.4) on fatigue and a small effect (ES: 0.04) on QOL compared to low flavonoid cocoa. Conclusion: Plant-based diet is a backbone for dietary recommendations in MS patients although low-fat, low-calorie, and KD diets with the addition of fish oil, vegetable oil, and flavonoids could be helpful.
Article
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Although the exact pathogenesis remains unknown, the leading theory is that it results from immune system dysregulation. Approved disease-modifying therapy appears to modulate the immune system to improve MS-related outcomes. There is substantial interest in the ability of dietary interventions to influence MS-related outcomes. This is an update of the Cochrane Review 'Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis' (Farinotti 2003; Farinotti 2007; Farinotti 2012). Objectives: To assess the effects of dietary interventions (including dietary plans with recommendations for specific whole foods, macronutrients, and natural health products) compared to placebo or another intervention on health outcomes (including MS-related outcomes and serious adverse events) in people with MS. Search methods: On 30 May 2019, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD). We checked reference lists in identified trials and requested information from trial authors to identify any additional published or unpublished data. Selection criteria: We included any randomized controlled trial (RCT) or controlled clinical trial (CCT) examining the effect of a dietary intervention versus placebo or another intervention among participants with MS on MS-related outcomes, including relapses, disability progression, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures. Data collection and analysis: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Planned primary outcomes were number of participants experiencing relapse and change in disability progression, according to a validated disability scale at the last reported follow-up. Secondary outcomes included MRI activity, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. We entered and analysed data in Review Manager 5. Main results: We found 41 full-text articles examining 30 trials following full-text review. Participants were adults with MS, defined by established criteria, presenting to MS clinics in Europe, North America, and the Middle East. Study design varied considerably, although all trials had at least one methodological issue leading to unknown or high risk of bias. Trials examined: supplementation to increase polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (11 trials); a variety of antioxidant supplements (10 trials); dietary programmes (3 trials); and other dietary supplements (e.g. acetyl L-carnitine, biotin, creatine, palmitoylethanolamide, probiotic, riboflavin) (6 trials). In three trials comparing PUFAs with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), the evidence was very uncertain concerning difference in relapses (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.20; 3 studies, 217 participants; 75% in the PUFA group versus 74% in the MUFA group; very low-certainty evidence). Among four trials comparing PUFAs with MUFAs, there may be little to no difference in global impression of deterioration (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.03; 4 studies, 542 participants; 40% in the PUFA group versus 47% in the MUFA group; low-certainty evidence). In two trials comparing PUFAs with MUFAs (102 participants), there was very low-certainty evidence for change in disability progression. None of the PUFA versus MUFA trials examined MRI outcomes. In one trial comparing PUFAs with MUFAs (40 participants), there were no serious adverse events; based on low-certainty evidence. In two trials comparing different PUFAs (omega-3 versus omega-6), there may be little to no difference in relapses (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.66; 2 studies, 129 participants; 30% in the omega-3 versus 29% in the omega-6 group; low-certainty evidence). Among three trials comparing omega-3 with omega-6, there may be little to no difference in change in disability progression, measured as mean change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (mean difference (MD) 0.00, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.30; 3 studies, 166 participants; low-certainty evidence). In one trial comparing omega-3 with omega-6, there was likely no difference in global impression of deterioration (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.91; 1 study, 86 participants; 29% in omega-3 versus 29% in omega-6 group; moderate-certainty evidence). In one trial comparing omega-3 with omega-6 (86 participants), there was likely no difference in number of new T1- weighted gadolinium-enhancing lesions, based on moderate-certainty evidence. In four trials comparing omega-3 with omega-6, there may be little to no difference in serious adverse events (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.31; 4 studies, 230 participants; 6% in omega-3 versus 5% in omega-6 group; low-certainty evidence). In four trials examining antioxidant supplementation with placebo, there may be little to no difference in relapses (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.64; 4 studies, 345 participants; 17% in the antioxidant group versus 17% in the placebo group; low-certainty evidence). In six trials examining antioxidant supplementation with placebo, the evidence was very uncertain concerning change in disability progression, measured as mean change of EDSS (MD -0.19, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.11; 6 studies, 490 participants; very low-certainty evidence). In two trials examining antioxidant supplementation with placebo, there may be little to no difference in global impression of deterioration (RR 0.99, 95% 0.50 to 1.93; 2 studies, 190 participants; 15% in the antioxidant group versus 15% in the placebo group; low-certainty evidence). In two trials examining antioxidant supplementation with placebo, the evidence was very uncertain concerning difference in gadolinium-enhancing lesions (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.09 to 4.88; 2 studies, 131 participants; 11% in the antioxidant group versus 16% in the placebo group; very low-certainty evidence). In three trials examining antioxidant supplementation versus placebo, there may be little to no difference in serious adverse events (RR. 0.72, 95% CI 0.17 to 3.08; 3 studies, 222 participants; 3% in the antioxidant group versus 4% in the placebo group; low-certainty evidence). Authors' conclusions: There are a variety of controlled trials addressing the effects of dietary interventions for MS with substantial variation in active treatment, comparator, and outcomes of interest. PUFA administration may not differ when compared to alternatives with regards to relapse rate, disability worsening, or overall clinical status in people with MS, but evidence is uncertain. Similarly, at present, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether supplementation with antioxidants or other dietary interventions have any impact on MS-related outcomes.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.