Conference PaperPDF Available

Game Changer: Designing Co-Located Games that Utilize Player Proximity

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The Game Changer Suite is a collection of multiplayer game prototypes developed to explore cooperative and competitive gameplay in a co-located setting. In particular, the game mechanics employed by each of the Game Changer prototypes utilize the respective proximity of players to encourage them either to work together or compete against each other in different scenarios. Although preliminary gameplay analysis suggests that the utilization of player proximity is effective in fostering player awareness and safety in a co-located game, unintended player behavior was also observed that may require further measures.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Proceedings of DiGRA 2015 Conference: Diversity of Play: Games Cultures - Identities.
© 2015 Authors & Digital Games Research Association DiGRA. Personal and educational classroom use of
this paper is allowed, commercial use requires specific permission from the author.
Game Changer: Designing Co-Located Games
that Utilize Player Proximity
Jeremiah Diephuis, Andreas Friedl, Georgi Kostov,
Poorya Piroozan, Daniel Wilfinger
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria
Softwarepark 11
4232 Hagenberg, AUSTRIA
+43 (0)50804-22122
jeremiah.diephuis@fh-hagenberg.at,
{andreas.friedl, georgi.kostov, poorya.piroozan, daniel.wilfinger}
@students.fh-hagenberg.at
Keywords
Game design, co-located play, player proximity
INTRODUCTION
As games become more pervasive, leaving the living room and entering the public arena,
the sheer physicality of players takes on a more prominent role. Whether a massively
multiplayer hybrid-reality game, such as Ingress (Niantic Labs, 2013), or a camera-
tracked two-player competition, new issues arise that are largely unaddressed in the
design and development of traditional console or computer games. Although limitations
in regards to player speed and size, in addition to the high degree of variance of these
attributes between individual players, are to be expected and these can indeed lead to
some difficulties in creating a fair and balanced gameplay experience the combination
of multiple players competing and/or cooperating in the same physical environment
presents a number of interesting design challenges.
CO-LOCATED PLAY
Playing games with others in the same physical space can offer several benefits such as
increased levels of communication between players and even foster sociability and
collaboration between unacquainted individuals (Machaj et al, 2009; Fischer &
Hornecker, 2012). However, in large-display and floor-based games in which an
immersive environment is created, specific problems can arise, such as the inability to
distribute attention over such a wide field of view (Feng & Spence, 2010). The presence
of other players in the same space can also easily block the view, distract or otherwise
frustrate other players, severely inhibiting cooperative gameplay (Diephuis et al, 2013).
DESIGNING THE GAME CHANGER SUITE
The Game Changer Suite is a collection of multiplayer game prototypes developed to
explore cooperative and competitive gameplay in a co-located setting. In particular, the
game mechanics employed by each of the Game Changer prototypes utilize the
-- 2 --
respective proximity of players to encourage them either to work together or compete
against each other in different scenarios.
The general design process for public space games (and many co-located games) requires
the consideration of certain limitations that most games do not have to deal with
(Kortbek, 2008; Mueller et al, 2014):
The controller is the player’s physical body: Some players may be able to run
faster, or be physically larger or heavier. Thus, there are fewer constants, such as
how fast players can move in the virtual world. Also, although basic interaction is
fairly intuitive (players simply move their body to correspondingly move their
character), there are no unambiguous controls like button states to designate tasks
such as picking up objects, firing a weapon, etc.
Limited game space, virtual world: Although the environment for a public space
game can be quite large, it is usually constrained by physical barriers such as
walls or the range of a tracking system. Also, the mapping of the virtual world to
the real playing field can be quite tricky, particularly in combination with a large
display that may tower several meters above players’ heads.
Designing for a varying amount of players: Games that are played in public
spaces almost always require the ability for players to start or leave the game at
any time without creating a severe disadvantage to the other players.
Avoiding physical collisions: As the game pulls the attention of players from the
real world to the immersive virtual environment, physical collisions are a very
real danger. As such, efforts need to be made to make players aware of their
proximity to other players.
An examination of these design issues combined with a review of existing large-scale
interactive applications (Praxmarer & Wagner, 2013) revealed player proximity as a
critical design element. Although the use of player proximity as a central game element is
certainly not a new approach, particularly since the emergence of GPS and Bluetooth-
enabled smartphones (Lautamäki & Suomela, 2008), documented experience of its
utilization in co-located games is still fairly rudimentary.
To explore how player proximity could be utilized in a co-located setting, five game
prototypes were developed for a large-display environment with a focus on different
aspects of competitive and/or cooperative gameplay, both from an individual and team
perspective (see figure 1).
-- 3 --
Figure 1: The Game Changer menu (a) utilizes a co-located democratic
process to select each of the five games. Beelzeball (b) is a point-based,
360-degree multiplayer version of “Arkanoid-meets-Pong”. Fish Feast (c)
pits players against each other in the quest to become the biggest fish in the
sea. Both Tower of Power (d) and Fluridus 293 (e) employ team-based
approaches to collect resources; the former to build towers and the latter to
repair a spaceship. Swarm Defender (f) requires players to occasionally
join forces to destroy invading ships with the right color of laser.
PLAYING THE GAME CHANGER SUITE
The five game prototypes of the Game Changer Suite were tested over a period of five
days during an international media festival. Observation and post-game video analysis
from the testing phase corroborate the utility of player proximity in a co-located setting.
Additionally, some unintended but rather interesting behavior was observed:
In Fish Feast, players would frequently be so involved in trying to evade the
largest fish that they would inadvertently leave the tracking area, unfortunately
resulting in the virtual death of their fish.
In Fluridus 293, some players would physically surround and block an opponent
player from even approaching an available resource.
In Beelzeball, a few players engaged in behavior endearingly referred to as
“body-check-cheating”, in which they would hijack another player’s avatar (and
points) by physically occupying the same space.
In Swarm Defender, large numbers of players (>20) would occasionally
congregate, resulting in a high number of merged spaceships. In these cases,
personal distance was still usually maintained by staggering the positions of
players (i.e. players stood either further to the front or back to maintain their
distance).
In Tower of Power, some players would physically push away an opponent player
who had grabbed a bomb to prevent him/her from destroying their tower.
-- 4 --
CONCLUSION
Co-located games in immersive settings require specific considerations to ensure an
enjoyable experience. Utilizing player proximity as a key game element not only serves
to encourage cooperation and competitive gameplay between players, but it can also
foster awareness of other players, and thus, increase player safety. The Game Changer
Suite provides a working model for the integration of player proximity, but will require
further adaptation to deal with some of the observed unintended behavior.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Diephuis, J., Lankes M., Hochleitner, W. (2013) Another Brick in the (Fifth) Wall:
Reflections on Creating a Co-located Multiplayer Game for a Large Display.”
Context Matters!, Vienna, Austria, (pp. 162-167).
Feng, J., & Spence, I. (2010). “Left or Right?: Spatial Arrangement for Information
Presentation on Large Displays,” in Proceedings of the 2010 Conference of the
Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (pp. 154159).
Fischer, P. T., & Hornecker, E. (2012). Urban HCI: Spatial Aspects in the Design of
Shared Encounters for Media Facades,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 307316).
Kortbek, K. J. (2008). “Interaction Design for Public Spaces,” in Proceedings of the
16th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 1031-1034). ACM.
Lautamäki, J., & Suomela, R. (2008). “Using Player Proximity in Mobile Multiplayer
Games: Experiences from Sandman,” in Proceedings of the 2008 International
Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 248-
251). ACM.
Machaj, D., Andrews, C., & North, C. (2009). “Co-located Many-player Gaming on
Large High-resolution Displays,” in Proceedings of the 2009 International
Conference on Computational Science and Engineering Volume 04 (pp. 697
704).
Mueller, F., Stellmach, S., Greenberg, S., Dippon, A., Boll, S., Garner, J., ... &
Altimira, D. (2014). Proxemics Play: Understanding Proxemics for Designing
Digital Play Experiences,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing
Interactive Systems (pp. 533-542). ACM.
Niantic Labs. Ingress. https://www.ingress.com/ (accessed January 2015)
Praxmarer, R., & Wagner, T. (2013). Playfulness and Large-scale Interactive
Projections in Public Space,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International workshop
on (Re)Creating Lively Cities through Ambient Technologies: Arts, Culture,
and Gastronomic Experiences. No. 2013/3, (pp. 18-30).
... The basis for this thesis was formed through the development of five floorbased multiplayer games. Together, these games form the Game Changer suite [11]. It was first shown at the Ars Electronica Festival 2014 in Linz and afterwards became a permanent exhibition in the Ars Electronica museum. ...
... In large-display and floor-based games the players are often constantly moving around in the playing field. For example, most of the games in Game Changer involve fast-paced gameplay in which player proximity is a major concern [11]. For these kind of games the distraction through a second screen can even be dangerous as players not focusing on their surrounding might crash into each other. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
This thesis shows the diversity of co-located floor-based video games and elaborates on how the user interface in such games can be extended. A particular focus lies on how to give the player more control over the game and more ways to perform explicit actions during the game. First a selection of co-located video games is described and some of its technical features are discussed. Furthermore, there are deeper insights into the field of smart gaming, a genre in video games which integrates so called smart devices (mobile multifunctional devices, such as smartphones and tablets) directly into the game play. MoCo is introduced as a novel concept. It is the approach developed by the author to integrate mobile devices in co-located games and, thereby, on the one hand to extend the controls and on the other hand to offer a new game experience. In order to be able to rate the capability and efficiency of this system, a game experience survey with a selected group of users as well as an expert heuristic evaluation with focus on usability and playability were conducted. Finally, the results of both evaluations show that MoCo is not fully matured yet and requires further improvement. However, the idea behind the concept has the potential to pave new paths in co-located floor-based games.
Article
Full-text available
Digital games are increasingly profiting from sensing technologies. However, their focus is mostly on sensing limb movements. We propose that sensing capabilities could also be used to engage players with proxemics: the interpersonal distance between players. We further add that wireless networks offer complementary distance zones for designers, offering novel design resources for digital play. We use our own as well as other games to articulate a set of strategies on how designers can utilize both proxemics and the new wireless proxemics to facilitate novel play experiences. Ultimately, with our work, we aim to expand the range of digital play.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The game Limelight was developed for co-located play in an exhibition space with a large display. Although intended for a larger audience and designed to accommodate multiple player roles, its first public demonstrations have revealed a few unexpected design issues that inhibit cooperative co-located play in conjunction with the large projection surface. In particular, observation and video analysis indicate that player movement and positioning not only significantly affect gameplay performance, but can also severely limit the awareness of individual players and thus impede cooperation. The authors utilize the concept of the fifth wall to designate the game design dependencies that separate the experience of individual players.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In this abstract I describe the doctorial research project "Interaction Design for Public Spaces". The objective of the project is to explore and design interaction contexts in culture related public spaces such as museums, experience centres and festivals. As a perspective on this domain, I will focus on the usage of the body as an interaction device. Furthermore, the project will involve a dramaturgic take on communication and design of interactive systems in the pursuit of new ways to stage the interactive contexts. The outcome of the project will be guidelines and conceptual frameworks which will help interaction designers when designing for bodily movement, and communicating and staging interactive content in public spaces.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Paradoxically, recent increases in the physical size and resolution of displays have introduced new challenges for interface design over a wide field of view. Since the visual system processes information very differently depending on whether it is presented in the central or in the peripheral regions of the visual field, the effectiveness of our ability to process information at large visual angles is largely unknown. Whether processing capability varies significantly in the periphery of computer displays is an unsettled question. An answer to this question could guide the development of best practices for the spatial arrangement of information in large displays. In our experiment, we show that information presented in the left visual field is processed faster and more accurately than in the right visual field. This difference suggests that more important information and data requiring immediate attention or rapid processing should preferably be presented in the left visual field. We discuss potential applications of our results using the dashboard interface with two examples: real-time stock market monitoring and the arrangement of gadgets on personalized pages.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Two primary types of multiplayer gaming have emerged over the years. The first type involves co-located players on a shared display, and typically caps at four players. The second type of gaming provides a single display for each player. This type scales well beyond four players, but places no requirement on co-location. This paper will attempt to combine the best of both worlds via co-located many-player gaming on large high-resolution displays. Results show that with more people, a greater amount of the time during a game was filled with vocal interactions between players. There were also more physical movements in the larger games. Over the course of this study, we learned that good high-resolution games will: provide a singular gameplay area, take advantage of the physical space in front of the display, provide feedback that is localized to each player, and use input devices appropriately.
Conference Paper
Designing interactive applications for Media Facades is a challenging task. Architectural sized largescale screens can result in unbalanced installations, and meaningful interaction is easily overshadowed by the drastic size of the display. In this paper we reflect on urban technology interventions by analyzing their spatial configuration in relation to the structuring of interaction. We outline basic categories and offer a new terminology to describe these interactive situations designed for the built environment.
Conference Paper
In addition to using Bluetooth as a communication channel, it can be used to discover other devices nearby. In games, such information can be used in many ways, such as to group people or direct player to player interaction for instance. In this paper, we explore the possibility to use social proximity in multiplayer gaming using mobile phones. As an example, we describe Sandman, which is a context-aware game built on the Multi-User Publishing Environment (MUPE) platform. The game is available for mobile phones with an access to the internet, Bluetooth, and Java MIDP 2.0
Playfulness and Large-scale Interactive Projections in Public Space
  • R Praxmarer
  • T Wagner
Praxmarer, R., & Wagner, T. (2013). "Playfulness and Large-scale Interactive Projections in Public Space," in Proceedings of the 2nd International workshop on (Re)Creating Lively Cities through Ambient Technologies: Arts, Culture, and Gastronomic Experiences. No. 2013/3, (pp. 18-30).