Content uploaded by Caroline Hollins Martin
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Caroline Hollins Martin on Feb 09, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Hollins Martin, C. J. (2008). Birth planning for midwives and mothers. British
Journal of Midwifery.16 (9):583-587.
Caroline J. Hollins Martin PhD, MPhil, BSc, PGCE, ADM, RM, RGN
Senior Lecturer, Department of Health and Social Care, Glasgow Caledonian
University, UK
Address for correspondence: Caroline Hollins Martin, Senior Lecturer, Department of
Health and Social Care, Floor 2, Goven Mbeki Building, Glasgow Caledonian
University; E-mail: Caroline.HollinsMartin@gcal.ac.uk
Birth planning for midwives and mothers
1
Abstract
If women are to be empowered to make choices for childbirth, it is important that
midwives explore and discuss their wishes and feelings about the delivery options
available. Providing practical and sensible information should facilitate women with
constructing a more accurate picture from which realistic hopes, fears and expectations
can be formulated about impending labour. To facilitate midwives with this process, a
flexible framework for a “birth plan” has been proposed. This easy to complete template
can be used to assist childbearing women with assimilating their ambitions and desires
regarding labour. Birth planning is important, since studies that compare women’s
expectations of childbirth with actual experience present contrasting accounts, with
disappointment, guilt and failure compared with delight, pride and success. Since
experiences differ, it is recommended that midwives audit birth satisfaction against
women’s birth plans. Results would inform auditors of whether there is satisfaction with
a woman’s birth experience and the quality of care that she perceived she received.
Women’s articulated wishes about birth would facilitate understanding of why
satisfaction/dissatisfaction occurs.
Word count = including abstract and references
Key Words: birth plan, intranatal, education, preparation, audit, evaluation, birth
satisfaction
Key Points
(1) Providing practical and sensible information should empower
childbearing women to make informed and realistic choices about birth.
(2) Birth planning facilitates women with assimilating ambitions in relation to
impending labour.
(3) Audits of birth satisfaction are important, since scores inform maternity care
professionals about the quality of care women perceive they recieve.
Birth planning for midwives and mothers
2
Over recent years childbearing women have requested more choice and control
in relation to the process of giving birth (DoH, 1993, 2004; Gibbins and Thomson,
2001; RCOG, 2007). Concepts of control and confidence are firmly associated with
birth satisfaction (Goodman et al., 2004; Knapp, 1996), with women who feel in control
during labour reporting raised levels of satisfaction and emotional health at 6 weeks
postpartum (Green et al., 2003). Women who feel in control during labour are also more
likely to express long-term satisfaction with their birth experience when asked years later
(Simkin, 1991). Kitzinger (1992) describes the perceptions of some women who 50
years later are still trying to deal with memories of dreadful childbirth over which they
had minimal control. In order for midwives to optimise women’s experiences, they
require to explore and discover their feelings and wishes in relation to giving birth
(Gibbens and Thomson, 2001). Thorough preparation enhances sense of confidence
(Handfield and Bell, 1995), since realistic expectations are promoted and expectantly
filled. Participating in decision-making is a vital component of birth satisfaction, with the
concept linked to feeling in control of emotions (Berg et al., 1996; Gibbins and
Thomson, 2001). Preparation also has an effect on duration of labour (Niven, 1994),
with postpartum adjustment determined by perceptions of confidence and control in the
prenatal period (Beeb et al., 2007; Sieber et al., 2007; Soet et al., 2003).
For the midwife, consumer and researcher, birth satisfaction includes treating
women with respect, listening to their aspirations, considering their comfort and
providing the particular kinds of pain relief they request. Every woman constructs
expectations of childbirth, with variation among individuals in appreciating these
concepts (Gibbens and Thomson, 2001).
Good antenatal education is an important part of preparing women for childbirth,
since knowledge exerts influence upon women’s confidence and ability to cope (Sinclair,
1999) and effects perceptions of their birth experience (Gibbins and Thomson, 2001).
One of the aims of parenthood education is to enhance women’s self-efficacy in relation
to giving birth (Handfield and Bell, 1995). Self-efficacy is described by Bandura (1982)
as an individual’s estimate of their own ability to succeed in reaching a goal. Bandura’s
self-efficacy theory centres around gaining information about a person’s predicted
performance and how this effects their perceived ability to cope. Of chief interest to
midwives, is that high self-efficacy beliefs concerning ability to cope during labour have
been found to reduce levels of pain experienced (Larsen et al., 2001; Stockman &
Altmaier, 2001). This has important implications for midwives, since women who
anticipate poor self-performance can have birth preparation tailored towards reducing
specified areas of anxiety and providing individualised support.
3
Ninety-five percent of midwives support the concept of choice provision, which
involves encouraging women to play an integral role in decision-making (Hollins Martin
and Bull, 2006), consistent with what is directed in social policy documents (DoH,
1993; DoH, 2004). Encouraging articulation of preferences in a clear, precise and
interpretable way should raise midwives awareness of the childbearing woman’s
philosophy and ambitions for labour. This is important since Neuhaus et al. (2002) found
many women expressing a perception of birth as a normal process that does not require
hospital care. These women perceived that “home birth” would:
- provide them with more freedom of choice.
- cause them less anxiety than a hospital birth.
- accommodate more personal relationships with the midwife.
- result in less medical intervention.
It is interesting that discussions surrounded childbirth are conducted in such a
polarised manner, with belief that one process is medicalised and the other naturalised
(Neuhaus et al., 2002). Perhaps the best alternative to clinical obstetric care is not to
have a homebirth, but rather an improvement of births in the hospital setting (Schmidt,
1997). Effective birth planning would be one contribution toards achieving this goal.
There are a variety of ways that midwives can prepare women for childbirth.
Information may be presented in parenthood education classes, information packs,
books, pamphlets, through use of audiovisual aids that are presented as documents or
accessible “on line”. Education empowers women to formulate pictures of their hopes,
fears and expectations about impending labour (Price, 1998), with a written “birth plan”
one way of expressing choice (Price, 1998). A “birth plan” should not be a written
prescription of orders that midwives must follow. Instead, it is a concrete copy of
articulated ideas and expectations about how a woman would like her birth to proceed.
To facilitate midwives with the process of birth planning, a flexible framework has been
constructed. This easy to complete template is medium through which women can
communicate their ambitions and desires about birth to the intranatal midwife.
The hitchhikers guide to “birth planning”
(1) Clearly define the purpose of a “birth plan”
4
A “birth plan” is a written account of how the woman would like her birth to proceed.
Content ought to consist of the woman’s preferences about what she considers would
make her birth a gratifying and satisfying experience. The following template has been
designed to guide midwives through the process of birth planning with a childbearing
women (see Table 1).
TABLE 1
(2) Provide information and evidence to underpin choice
During the process of writing a “birth plan”, it is critical that the information given is
evidence-based (Reynolds & Trinder, 2000). It is unethical for the midwife to filter,
censor or alter information solely to perpetuate hospital culture and protect themselves
from fears associated with challenge from authority. All options should be disclosed,
even when they are not available in the woman’s chosen place of birth, since litigation
includes failure to provide accurate details about specific treatments that were or were
not made available. Antenatal classes are one medium for transmitting important
information. In such a forum, information may be given and followed up with discussion
about thoughts, feelings and experiences in relation to the options presented (National
Childbirth Trust, 1995). Contents of discussions might include:
(a) The advantages of normal birth in relation to:
- post-natal pain reduction (Tucker, 1996).
- quicker physical recovery (Johanson et al., 1993).
- improved opportunities for bonding (Odent, 1999).
- reduced cardiototcography and intervention (Patison and McCowen, 2005).
- amniotomy, which is contraindicated in a healthy term pregnancy (Fraser et al.,
1993).
(b) The pros and cons of different methods of pain relief.
(c) The benefits of mobility during labour.
(d) Advantages of adopting particular positions before and during labour (Al-Mufti
et al., 1996).
(e) The benefits of having a continuous support person present (Hodnet et al., 2003).
(f) The importance of providing partner choice about whether to attend birth or not.
(g) Preferred place of birth
(Studies of planned home births in developed countries have shown sickness and
death rates for mother and baby are equal to or better than hospital birth statistics
for women with uncomplicated pregnancies (Olsen, 1997).
5
(h) Physiological versus active management of third stage.
(i) Initiating feeding.
(j) Use of Vitamin K.
Table 2. provides a flexible framework for a “birth plan” that may be given to the
childbearing woman to complete.
TABLE 2
The importance of evaluation
So why then, is the concept of birth satisfaction so important? This question can be
answered in two words, “cost” and “quality” (Ware, 1994). Put simply, management of
birth cannot be of high quality unless the person is satisfied with the care they have
received (Mahon, 1996).
Studies that compare women’s expectations with actual experience of birth
present contrasting accounts; one central discrepancy involves a disparity between pain
anticipated and what is actually experienced (Hallgren et al., 1995), with this
inconsistency influencing women’s perceptions and emotional outcomes post event. For
instance, disappointment, guilt and failure may be contrasted with delight, pride and
success (Quinne et al., 1993). Reduced capacity for coping during labour (Shearer,
1995) and high anxiety (Heaman et al., 1992) are also central predictors of a negative
birth experience (Larsen et al., 2001; Shearer, 1995; Stockman & Altmaier, 2001).
Accordingly, identifying anxiety provoking features is imperative if midwives are to instil
confidence in women’s ability to cope during childbirth.
For these reasons, women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth become
important and should be evaluated. Scores will inform about whether or not there is
satisfaction with the quality of care perceived to have been received. Findings would
assist with advancement of care provision on several counts; (1) Identifying facets of
disappointment that may be remedied. (2) Advancing research, e.g., correlating scores
with other psychometric measures, i.e., self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, locus of
control. (3) Evaluating models or systems of care as a stand alone instrument or as a
screening test prior to in depth qualitative work.
Conclusion
It has been proposed that quality “birth planning” become elemental practice for
midwives in the UK. First and foremost, self-assessed profiles of desires about childbirth
will provide deeper insights into women’s wants from their birth experience. From these
6
expressions, midwives may come closer to meeting the needs and wishes of childbearing
women, in accordance with requests of social policy documents (DoH, 1993; DoH,
2004). It is important to stress that many of the problems that occur during labour are
unavoidable, especially when the process is complicated with fetal distress, maternal
suffering, failure to progress, obstructed labour, malposition and so forth. Nonetheless,
occurrence of such complications does not negate responsibility towards attempting to
provide a fulfilling experience and appropriate, effective and holistic care to childbearing
women. It is therefore recommended that practice development midwives use valid and
reliable psychometric tools to assess women’s satisfaction with their birth experience.
References
Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM (1996) Obstetricians’ personal choice and mode of
delivery. Lancet 347-544
Bandura A (1982) Self efficacy mechanism in humans. American Psychologist 37(2),
122-147
Beebe K, Lee K, Carrien-Kohlman V, Humphreys J (2001) The effects of childbirth self-
efficacy on pre-hospitalisation labour. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal
Nursing 36, 410-418
Berg M, Lundgren I, Hermansson E (1996) Women’s experience of the encounter with
the midwife during childbirth. Midwifery 12, 11-15
Department of Health (1993) Expert maternity group, changing childbirth document.
HMSO, London
Department of Health (2004) Maternity standard, national service framework for
children, young people and maternity services. HMSO, London
Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Moutquin JM, Chisten A (1993) Effects of early amniotomy on
the risk of dystocia in nulliparous women. New England Journal Medicine 22, 328
(16),1145-1149
7
Gibbens J, Thomson AM (2001) Women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth.
Midwifery 17, 302-313
Goodman P, Mackay MC, Tavakoli AS (2004) Factors related to childbirth satisfaction.
Journal of Advanced Nursing 46, 212-219
Green JM, Baston HA, Easton SC, McCormick F (2003) Greater expectations. The
inter-relationship between women’s expectations and experience of decision-making,
continuity, choice and control in labor, and psychological outcomes. Summary Report:
Mother and Infant Research Unit, University of Leeds
Hallgren A, Kihlgren M, Norberg A (1995) Women’s perceptions of childbirth and
childbirth education before and after education and birth. Midwifery 11: 130-137
Handfield B, Bell R (1995) Do childbirth classes influence decision making about labour
and postpartum issues? Birth 22(3), 153-160
Heaman M, Beaton J, Gupton A (1992) A comparison of childbirth expectations in high
risk and low risk pregnant women. Clinical Nursing Research 1(3), 252-265
Hodnet ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C (2003) Continuous support for women
during childbirth (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4, 2003. John Wiley &
Sons Ltd, Chichester
Hollins Martin CJ, Bull P (2006) What features of the maternity unit promote obedient
behaviour from midwives? Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 952, e221-e231
Johanson RB, Wilkinson P, Bastible A (1993) Health after childbirth: a comparison of
normal and assisted delivery. Midwifery 9: 161-168
Kitzinger S (1992) Birth and violence against women: generating hypotheses from
women’s accounts of unhappiness after childbirth. In Roberts H (Ed) Women’s Health
Matters. Routledge, London
Knapp L (1996) Childbirth satisfaction: the effects of internality and perceived control.
Journal of Perinatal Education 5, 7-16
Larsen K, O’Hara M, Brewer K, Wenzel A ( 2001) A prospective study of self-efficacy
expectancies and labor pain. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology 19(3), 203-
214
Mahon PY (1996) An analysis of the concept “patient satisfaction” as it relates to
contemporary nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24, 1241-1248
National Childbirth Trust (1995) Birth choices – women’s expectations and experiences.
NCT, London.
Neuhaus W, Piroth C, Kiencke P, Gohring UJ, Mallman P (2002) A psychosocial
analysis of women planning birth outside hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynacology 22(2), 143-149
Niven C (1994) Coping with labour pain: the midwife’s role. In: Robinson S, Thomson
AM (eds) Midwives Research and Childbirth (Vol 3). Chapman & Hall, London
8
Odent M (1999) Scientification of love. Free Association Books, London
Olsen O (1997) Meta-analysis of the safety of home birth. Birth 24(1), 4-16
Patison N, McCowen L (2005) Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment. The
Chochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 1. Art. No: CD001068). John Wiley
& Sons Ltd, Chichester
Price S (1998) Birth plans and their impact on midwifery care. MIDIRS 8(2), 189-191
Quinne L, Rutter DR, Gowan S (1993) Women’s satisfaction with the quality of the
birth experience: a prospective study of social and psychological predictors. Journal of
Reproductive and Infant Psychology 11, 107-113
Reynolds S, Trinder L (2000) Evidence-based practice: a critical appraisal. Oxford:
Blackwell Science.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) (2007) Safer
Childbirth:Minimum Standards for the Organisation and Delivery of Care in Labour.
RCOG press, London
Schmidt W (1997) Integration ‘alternativer’ geburtshilflicher Verfahren in die klinische
Geburtshilfe. Vortrag auf der 169. Tagung der Mittelrheinischen Gesellschaft fur
Geburtshilfe und Gynakologie. Homburg/Saar
Sieber S, Germann N, Barbir A, Ehlert U (2007) Emotional well-being and predictors of
birth anxiety, self-efficacy and psychological adaptation in healthy pregnant women Acta
Obstetric Gynecologia Scandinavia 85(10), 1200-1207
Shearer EL (1995) Commentary: many factors effect the outcome of prenatal classes.
Birth 22(1), 27-28
Simkin PT (1991) Just another day in a woman’s life? Part 1: women’s long-term
perceptions of their first birth experience. Birth 18, 203-210
Sinclair M (1999) The childbirth self-efficacy inventory: a replication study. Journal
of Advanced Nursing 30(6), 1416-1423
Soet J, Brack G, DiIorio C (2003) Prevalence and predictors of women’s experience of
psychological trauma during childbirth. Birth 30, 36-46
Stockman A, Altmaier E (2001) Relation of self-efficacy to reported pain and pain
medication usage during labour. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
8, 161-166
Tucker G (1996) The national Childbirth Trust of pregnancy, birth and parenthood.
NCT, London
Ware J (1994) Monitoring health care from the patient’s point of view. Hospital
practice. 15 May, 12 &17
9
Table 1. The midwives guide to “birth planning”
____________________________________________________________
Questions to ask the childbearing woman Points for discussion
___________________________________________________________________________________
1. Where would you like to give birth? - options available
- advantages and disadvantage of having, e.g.,
(a) homebirth
(b) hospital birth
(c) waterbirth etc.
2. What kind of birth would you like? - differences between natural, augmented and
induced labour.
- advantages and disadvantages of adopting
different positions during the second stage of
labour.
- differences between active and physiological
third
stage.
- the purpose of episiotomy, instrumental delivery
& caesarian section.
3. What would you like the environment to be like? - homeliness, e.g., music, lighting, bed, beanbags
- freedom to move, walk, change positions
- own or hospital clothes?
- degree of privacy desired.
- who is to cut the cord?
- the place of taking photographs.
4. Do you want to be mobile during labour? - advantages and disadvantages of ambulating
during first stage of labour.
- interventions and their consequences, e.g.,
(a) cardiotocography
(b) epidural
(c) intravenous infusion
5. Do you want/not want pain relief? - the benefits of endorphins as natural pain
relief and their role in promoting bonding.
- natural methods of pain relief, e.g.,
(a) water
(b) TENS
(c) ambulation
- medical forms of pain relief, e.g.,
(a) opiates
10
(b) entonox
(c) epidural
- the relationship of epidural to monitoring, IV
infusion, catheterisation & forceps.
6. Who would you like to be your birth partner? - the role of the “birth partner”.
- the importance of partner choice.
- preparation available for the woman’s selected
“birth partner”.
7. Do you wish the baby to room in with you? - initiation of feeding.
- the importance of mother and baby interaction.
8. Ask the childbearing woman to make a list of her choices in order of priority (put most important
first).
9. Explain that the “birth plan” is more likely to actualise when labour remains normal (unexpected
situations may arise).
10. Clarify that the “birth plan” requires presenting in a comprehensive manner and must hold a polite
and pleasant tone.
11. Provide the woman with an information pack (could be on line) and a matching template for her
birth
plan.
12. Make an appointment to review the “birth plan” and discuss its achievability.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Table 2. My “birth plan”
____________________________________________________________
Name Hospital Number
Address
Phone number
Email
___________________________________________________________________________________
1. Where would you like to give birth?
___________________________________________________________________________________
2. What kind of birth would you like?
___________________________________________________________________________________
3. What would you like the environment to be like?
___________________________________________________________________________________
4. Do you want to be mobile during labour? YES / NO
___________________________________________________________________________________
5. Do you want/not want pain relief? YES / NO
What forms of pain relief would be acceptable to you?
___________________________________________________________________________________
6. Who would you like to be your birth partner?
Do they want to attend preparation classes? YES / NO
___________________________________________________________________________________
7. Do you wish the baby to room in with you? YES / NO
___________________________________________________________________________________
8. Make a list of your choices in order of priority (put most important first):
(1)_______________________________________________________________________________
(2)_______________________________________________________________________________
11
(3)_______________________________________________________________________________
(4)_______________________________________________________________________________
(5)_______________________________________________________________________________
(6)_______________________________________________________________________________
(7)_______________________________________________________________________________
(8)_______________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
9. Outline your main fears, worries and anxieties about giving birth?
____________________________________________________________________________
12
