BookPDF Available

Little by Little. Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies

Authors:

Abstract

[en] Little by little, nanotechnology has emerged amid enormous anticipations and fantastic promises of new materials, aspiring to manipulate our world "atom by atom." While these grand visions continue to capture the imaginations of various audiences---and continue to be contested, as well---nanotechnology has developed into more than that. During the last two decades, many research programs and industrial R&D expenditures have resulted in actual products and tangible innovations. Nanotechnology, it seems, is expanding. But what does it mean to say that nanotechnology is expanding?
A preview of the PDF is not available
Book
Full-text available
This book is devoted to the issue of how we can learn to live together in the face of division and conflict. It consists of a collection of papers presented at the 8th and 9th Olympiads of the Mind held in Washington, DC and Chania, Crete respectively. Distinguished international scholars, government and corporate representatives, leading researchers and academics from multiple disciplines, including three Nobel Laureates, address a broad range of issues all with the aim of improving the human condition and achieving cooperation among the people of the world. The topics include the environment, sustainability and security; diversity and how to achieve integration and peace among people in a fractured world; the important role of brain research; how to overcome poverty and inequality; how to enhance creativity and improve education at all levels; and how new technologies and tools can be used for common benefit.
Book
This book is devoted to the issue of how we can learn to live together in the face of division and conflict. It is dedicated to the life and work of a remarkable human being, Dr Epimenidis Haidemenakis, scientist, statesman, visionary leader, President Emeritus of the International S.T.E.P.S. Foundation and founding father of The Olympiads of the Mind (OM). The monograph consists of a collection of papers presented at the 8th and 9th Olympiads of the Mind held in Washington, DC and Chania, Crete respectively. Distinguished international scholars, government and corporate representatives, leading researchers and academics from multiple disciplines and Nobel Laureates Leon Lederman (Physics, 1988), Martin Perl (Physics, 1995) and Yuan T. Lee (Chemistry, 1986) address a broad range of issues all with the aim of improving the human condition and achieving cooperation among the people of the world. The topics include the environment, sustainability and security; diversity and how to achieve integration and peace among people in a fractured world; the important role of brain research; how to overcome poverty and inequality; how to enhance creativity and improve education at all levels; and how new technologies and tools can be used for common benefit. The culmination of the book is a call to action, to join what one might call the "OM Movement"-bringing the best minds in the world together to create solutions to world issues so that we can all live together in harmony. © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019. All rights reserved.
Chapter
In this paper I propose that happiness can be achieved by being variable in everything that we do. Being variable results in being adaptable in difficult situations such as dealing with other people that are different to you. By promoting variability in our lives, we can become more contented as we can overcome many obstacles. Striving to be variable in every aspect of our lives can promote a happier and healthier life that can translate to improved tolerance and adaptability in our social interactions. Variability in our lives can thus facilitate learning to live together.
Chapter
In this paper we summarize a brief history of nanoscience and nanotechnology by documenting the milestones on the roadmap of this branch. We discuss the new properties of materials and structures characteristic for the nanoworld. The role of social sciences and humanities in nanoscience is highlighted.
Article
Full-text available
This paper argues that challenges that are grand in scope such as “lifelong health and wellbeing”, “climate action”, or “food security” cannot be addressed through scientific research only. Indeed scientific research could inhibit addressing such challenges if scientific analysis constrains the multiple possible understandings of these challenges into already available scientific categories and concepts without translating between these and everyday concerns. This argument builds on work in philosophy of science and race to postulate a process through which non-scientific notions become part of science. My aim is to make this process available to scrutiny: what I call founding everyday ideas in science is both culturally and epistemologically conditioned. Founding transforms a common idea into one or more scientifically relevant ones, which can be articulated into descriptively thicker and evaluatively deflated terms and enable operationalisation and measurement. The risk of founding however is that it can invisibilise or exclude from realms of scientific scrutiny interpretations that are deemed irrelevant, uninteresting or nonsensical in the domain in question –but which may remain salient for addressing grand-in-scope challenges. The paper considers concepts of “wellbeing” in development economics versus in gerontology to illustrate this process.
Article
Full-text available
15 16 This collection addresses two different audiences: 1) historians and philosophers of the life sciences 17 reflecting on collaborations across disciplines, especially as regards defining and addressing Grand 18 Challenges; 2) researchers and other stakeholders involved in cross-disciplinary collaborations aimed 19 at tackling Grand Challenges in the life and medical sciences. The essays collected here offer ideas 20 and resources both for the study and for the practice of goal-driven cross-disciplinary research in the 21 life and medical sciences. We organise this introduction in three sections. The first section provides 22 some background and context. The second motivates our take on this topic and then outlines the 23 central ideas of each paper. The third section highlights the specificity and significance of this 24 approach by considering: a) how this collection departs from existing literature on inter-and trans-25 disciplinarity, b) what is characteristic about this approach, and c) what role this suggests for the 26 history and philosophy of the life sciences in addressing Grand Challenges. 27 28 Keywords 29 Grand Challenges, transdisciplinarity, interdisciplinary integration, translational research, 30 constructive modesty, philosophy of science in practice. 31 32 Highlights 33 34  Research practices demanded by Grand Challenges raise philosophical questions. 35  Grand Challenges require knowledge integration and its translation in practice. 36  We summarize the main arguments and theses of the essays collected. 37  Constructive modesty is a flexible, modular approach to transdisciplinary theory. 38  Devolutionist strategies for integration demand further work on responsible research. 39 40 41 1 The editors are joint first editors and listed alphabetically; both contributed in equal measure to the completion of this collection.
Article
Full-text available
Risk analysis (encompassing risk assessment, management, and communication) is touted internationally as the most appropriate approach for governing nanomaterials. In this article, we survey existing criticisms of risk assessment as a basis for regulatory decision making on emerging technologies, particularly highlighting its exclusion of key societal dimensions, its epistemological underdetermination, and its lack of democratic accountability. We then review the specific case of nanomaterials and identify six major barriers to the effective operation of both risk assessment and risk management. These include a lack of: nano-specific regulatory requirements, shared definitions, validated and accessible methods for safety testing, available scientific knowledge, reliable information on commercial use, and capacity for exposure mitigation. Finding the knowledge, standards, methods, tools, definitions, capacity, and political commitment all insufficient, we argue that risk analysis is a “naked emperor” for nanomaterial governance. We therefore suggest that additional concepts and approaches are essential for nanomaterials policy and regulation.
Article
Full-text available
http://www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/278/261
Article
Full-text available
Organ failure is one cause of death. Advancements in scientific research and technological development made organ transplantation possible and continue to find better ways to substitute failed organs with other organs of biological origin or artificial organs. Media, including newspapers, are one source of information for the public. The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent and how science and technology research and development are covered in the organ transplantation and organ donation (ODOT) coverage of n = 300 Canadian newspapers, including the two Canadian newspapers with national reach (The Globe and Mail, National Post). The study generated qualitative and quantitative data addressing the following issues: (1) which scientific and technological developments are mentioned in the ODOT coverage; and (2) what issues are mentioned in the coverage of scientific and technological advancements linked to ODOT. We found little to no coverage of many technological and scientific advancements evident in academic and grey literature covering ODOT, and we found little engagement with social and ethical issues already raised about these advancements in the literature. The only area we found to be covered to a broader extent was xenotransplantation, although the coverage stopped after 2002. We argue that the newspaper coverage of ODOT under reports scientific and technological advancements related to ODOT and the issues these advancements might raise.
Article
Full-text available
In the emerging technology domain of nanotechnology, a significant portion of small and midsize enterprises have contributed to the scientific literature by publishing their research and development results. However, while considerable attention has been paid to patenting by small and midsize technology firms, the underlying business motivations for such firms to publish scientific papers are not well understood. This paper investigates the scientific publishing patterns of smaller firms engaged in nanotechnology and the factors that underlie this phenomenon. Based on an analysis of 85 US small and midsize enterprises with a minimum of four nanotechnology patents or publications, we test three hypotheses about corporate publishing: reputational gains, absorptive capacity, and strategic spillovers. We find that the small and midsize firms in our sample are more likely to publish when their work is associated with public science and when it involves a greater technological focus, but having a university collaborator is not a significant factor. The results from this study of nanotechnology enterprises suggest that small and midsize technology firms selectively manage and disclose their research based on internal developmental and capacity drivers.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.