ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Considering the bilateral deficit, the sum of forces produced by each limb in a unilateral condition is generally greater than that produced by them in a bilateral condition. Therefore, it can be speculated that performing unilateral strength exercises may allow greater training workloads and subsequently greater neuromuscular adaptations when compared to bilateral training. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare neuromuscular adaptations to unilateral vs. bilateral training in the knee extensor muscles. Forty-three recreationally active young women were allocated to a control (CG), unilateral (UG) or bilateral (BG) training group, which performed 2 times strength training sessions a week for 12 weeks. Knee extension one repetition maximum (1RM), maximal isometric strength, muscle electrical activity and muscle thickness were obtained before and after the study period. Muscle strength was measured in unilateral (right + left) and bilateral tests. Both UG and BG increased similarly their unilateral 1RM (33.3±14.3% vs. 24.6±11.9%, respectively) and bilateral 1RM (20.3±6.8% vs. 28.5±12.3%, respectively) and isometric strength (14.7±11.3% vs. 13.1±12.5%, respectively). The UG demonstrated greater unilateral isometric strength increase than the BG (21.4±10.5% vs. 10.3±11.1%, respectively) and only the UG increased muscle electrical activity. Muscle thickness increased similarly for both training groups. Neither group exhibited pre-testing 1RM bilateral deficit values, but at post-testing, UG showed a significant bilateral deficit (-6.5±7.8%) while BG showed a significant bilateral facilitation (5.9±9.0%). Thus, performing unilateral or bilateral exercises was not a decisive factor for improving morphological adaptations and bilateral muscle strength in untrained women. Unilateral training, however, potentiate unilateral specific strength gains.
Content may be subject to copyright.
NEUROMUSCULAR ADAPTATIONS TO UNILATERAL VS.
BILATERAL STRENGTH TRAINING IN WOMEN
CI
´NTIA E. BOTTON,
1
REGIS RADAELLI,
1
EURICO N. WILHELM,
1
ANDERSON RECH,
1
LEE E. BROWN,
2
AND RONEI S. PINTO
1
1
Exercise Research Laboratory, Physical Education School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil;
and
2
Center for Sport Performance, Human Performance Laboratory, California State University, Fullerton, California
ABSTRACT
Botton, CE, Radaelli, R, Wilhelm, EN, Rech, A, Brown, LE, and
Pinto, RS. Neuromuscular adaptations to unilateral vs. bilateral
strength training in women. J Strength Cond Res 30(7):
1924–1932, 2016—Considering the bilateral deficit, the sum
of forces produced by each limb in a unilateral condition is
generally greater than that produced by them in a bilateral con-
dition. Therefore, it can be speculated that performing unilateral
strength exercises may allow greater training workloads and
subsequently greater neuromuscular adaptations when com-
pared with bilateral training. Hence, the purpose of this study
was to compare neuromuscular adaptations with unilateral vs.
bilateral training in the knee extensor muscles. Forty-three rec-
reationally active young women were allocated to a control,
unilateral (UG) or bilateral (BG) training group, which per-
formed 2 times strength training sessions a week for 12 weeks.
Knee extension one repetition maximum (1RM), maximal iso-
metric strength, muscle electrical activity, and muscle thick-
ness were obtained before and after the study period.
Muscle strength was measured in unilateral (right + left) and
bilateral tests. Both UG and BG increased similarly their uni-
lateral 1RM (33.3 614.3% vs. 24.6 611.9%, respectively),
bilateral 1RM (20.3 66.8% vs. 28.5 612.3%, respectively),
and isometric strength (14.7 611.3% vs. 13.1 612.5%,
respectively). The UG demonstrated greater unilateral isomet-
ric strength increase than the BG (21.4 610.5% vs. 10.3 6
11.1%, respectively) and only the UG increased muscle elec-
trical activity. Muscle thickness increased similarly for both
training groups. Neither group exhibited pretesting 1RM bilat-
eral deficit values, but at post-testing, UG showed a significant
bilateral deficit (26.5 67.8%) whereas BG showed a signifi-
cant bilateral facilitation (5.9 69.0%). Thus, performing unilat-
eral or bilateral exercises was not a decisive factor for
improving morphological adaptations and bilateral muscle
strength in untrained women. Unilateral training, however,
potentiate unilateral specific strength gains.
KEY WORDS resistance exercise, muscle thickness, deficit
INTRODUCTION
Strength exercises are often performed in 2 different
fashions, with 1 limb at a time (unilateral) or both
limbs simultaneously (bilateral). Previous studies
have shown that it is possible to produce greater
force in the sum of unilateral compared with bilateral (2,8).
The mechanisms explaining differences between these con-
ditions are not completely understood. However, the most
consistent explanation is that there is a neural limitation
during bilateral exercise, blunting maximal force produc-
tion (16,23). This phenomenon is known as the bilateral
deficit and is well documented by cross-sectional studies
in different muscle groups (21), populations, (14) and test
conditions (2).
Because of the bilateral deficit, it is possible to use greater
loads when exercise is performed unilaterally, which may be
a strategy to optimize strength gains. However, a limited
number of studies have compared the chronic neuromuscu-
lar adaptations of unilateral and bilateral strength training
(5,11,21,22). Some previous studies (5,11) have demon-
strated that despite either unilateral or bilateral training,
there are strength gains in the specific trained condition,
and an increase in the untrained condition. In contrast,
Taniguchi (21) showed that strength gains occurred only
after bilateral training.
A cross-sectional study reported that subjects who trained
at least 1 year unilaterally demonstrated bilateral deficit on
the knee extensor muscles compared with subjects bilaterally
trained (8). However, longitudinal studies (12–26 weeks)
with untrained people have found that unilateral training
had a slight nonsignificant increase in the bilateral deficit,
possibly due to a similar percentage change in the bilateral
and unilateral strength (5,21). On the other hand, bilateral
training resulted in significant decrease of bilateral deficit
(5,11,21) as a consequence of a greater magnitude of increase
in bilateral compared with unilateral strength.
Address correspondence to Cı
´ntia Ehlers Botton, cintiabotton@yahoo.
com.br.
30(7)/1924–1932
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Ó2015 National Strength and Conditioning Association
1924
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
The divergent results among few studies found in the
literature may be explained by different populations (males,
females, or mixed groups), period of training (6–26 weeks),
and type of resistance machine used during training (isoiner-
tial or isokinetic). For example, Ha
¨kkinen et al. (5) investi-
gated the effect of 12 weeks of isoinertial knee extension
training on middle-aged and older men and women, while
Janzen et al. (11) performed 26 weeks of knee extension
training in postmenopausal women. Differently of the afore-
mentioned studies (5,11), Taniguchi (21) performed 6 weeks
of isokinetic knee extension training in young men and
women. In addition, Kuruganti et al. (13) investigated the
effect of isokinetic bilateral training on the bilateral deficit,
but unilateral training was not studied. Moreover, previous
studies (21,22) have focused primarily on strength measure-
ment while investigating differences between training con-
ditions. Thus, there is a paucity of research regarding
unilateral vs. bilateral training differences related to morpho-
logical and neural adaptations.
Because unilateral training enables one to exercise with
greater load per trained limb, it may be speculated that
unilateral strength training would elicit greater skeletal muscle
adaptations compared with bilateral exercises. Therefore, the
purpose of this study was to investigate neuromuscular
adaptations to unilateral vs. bilateral training, and their
influence on the bilateral deficit in young women, because
the few studies in this area were performed with middle-aged
and elderly subjects and nonhomogeneous gender.
METHODS
Experimental Approach to the Problem
To compare the effects of unilateral and bilateral training,
subjects were required to visit the laboratory on 3 separate
days before study (pre) and twice after 12 weeks (post) with 4
days of interval between visits. On the first visit, muscle
thickness measurements were taken and subjects were famil-
iarized with the dynamic and isometric strength tests. On the
second day, anthropometric data were obtained and subjects
performed a maximal isometric strength test with simultaneous
collection of the electromyographic (EMG) signal. The
maximaldynamicstrengthwasmeasuredonthethirdvisit.
Thereafter, subjects were randomized on a control group or
training group, which exercised 2 times per week for 12 weeks.
Post-testing took place 3 to 5 days after the last training session
and was identical to pretesting. Intraclass correlation coeffi-
cients were calculated with data collected on day one and 2 for
the isometric test; and day one and 3 for dynamic test.
Subjects
Forty-three young women (18–30 years) volunteered for
this study. They were randomly assigned to either unilateral
group (UG) (n= 14: 24.8 61.4 years; 60.8 66.4 kg; 163.0 6
6.5 cm), bilateral group (BG) (n= 15: 24.3 63.7 years; 57.0 6
4.8 kg; 160.2 65.8 cm), or control group (CG) (n= 14: 22.7 6
2.8 years; 58.0 65.7 kg; 163.6 66.2 cm). Sample size was
based on standard deviations and differences between means
from Ha
¨kkinen et al. (5), with an alpha level of 0.05 and
power of 80%, and resulted in a minimum of 12 subjects
per group.
All subjects had not been involved in a systematic strength
training program for at least 3 months before this study, and 6
participants had never practiced strength training before.
Participants were not taking medications other than oral
contraceptives and were instructed to avoid changes in their
diet and recreational physical habits (e.g., sports, jogging, and
walking) throughout the study period. Only 6 women did not
take oral contraceptives (2 for each group). They were
informed of possible risks and discomforts of participation
and all gave their written informed consent before any testing.
This study was conducted according to the Declaration of
Helsinki and all procedures were approved by the Ethics
Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.
Procedures
Maximal Dynamic Strength. Knee extension 1 repetition
maximum (1RM) tests for bilateral and unilateral (right and
left) conditions were assessed on the same test day on the
same isoinertial knee extension machine used for training
(Taurus, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil). The same researchers, with
identical equipment and subject positioning, conducted all
pre- and post-testing. Subjects were carefully familiarized with
the testing procedures and performed a warm-up of 10
repetitions of bilateral knee extensions with a light resistance.
The bilateral extension was always tested first, followed by the
unilateral extension test for the right and left leg in random
order. Ten minutes of interval was given between the bilateral
and unilateral tests. The cadence was fixed at 2 seconds for
the concentric phase and 2 seconds for the eccentric phase
with the aid of an analog metronome (Quartz, Los Angeles,
CA, USA). Subjects started the test at 908of knee flexion (08=
knee fully extended) and moved to full extension which was
individualized for each subject and controlled by a delimiter
device. The maximal load was found within 3 attempts for
each testing condition, with 5-minute interval between trials.
Intraclass correlation coefficients for bilateral and unilateral
right and left were 0.96, 0.95, and 0.93, respectively.
Maximal Isometric Strength. Isometric knee extension test for
bilateral and unilateral (right and left) conditions were
performed on an isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex Norm,
Ronkonkoma, NY, USA), calibrated according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. The unilateral tests were per-
formed with the standard lever arm supplied by the manu-
facturer, whereas a custom made lever arm was used for
bilateral testing (Figure 1). Subjects were seated with their
hips flexed at 858(08= hip fully extended). For both tests, the
dynamometer’s axis of rotation was aligned with the lateral
femoral condyle of the tested limb, while straps secured the
torso and pelvis. Subjects performed 10 repetitions of con-
centric knee extension at 1208per second as a warm-up.
Thereafter, they completed two 5-second knee extension
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca.com
VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 7 | JULY 2016 | 1925
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
maximal isometric actions at a 608angle (08= knee fully
extended), with 3 minutes rest between attempts. All iso-
metric tests on bilateral and unilateral (right and left) con-
ditions were performed on the same day in randomized
order with 30 minutes rest between bilateral and unilateral
tests. Subjects were instructed and verbally encouraged to
produce maximal torque throughout each trial. Peak torque
values were determined by the dynamometer software
(Humac norm 2009, Version 9.6.2). The greatest isometric
peak torque value for each condition was used for further
analyses. Intraclass correlation coefficients for bilateral and
unilateral right and left were 0.78, 0.86, and 0.76, respectively.
Muscle Electrical Activity. Electromyographic (EMG) activity
was recorded from the vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris
(RF) muscles of the right and left limbs during maximal
isometric strength testing. Before electrode placement, skin
preparation was performed, including shaving excess hair and
cleaning the skin with isopropyl alcohol (to reduce impedance
below 2,000 kV). Bipolar configuration electrodes (20-mm
interelectrode distance) were positioned along the estimated
direction of the muscle fibers on the muscle belly according to
SENIAM (www.seniam.org). Electrode position was carefully
mapped using a transparent sheet to ensure replication posi-
tioning at post-testing.
Electromyographic signals were recorded using an electro-
myographic system (Miotool, Miotec-Equipamentos Biome
´-
dicos), amplified by a factor of 100 and digitized at a sampling
frequency of 2,000 Hz. The EMG signal was Butterworth
filtered using cut-off frequencies of 20 Hz and 500 Hz for
lower and upper band-pass respectively. After filtering, the
EMG signal from the highest isometric torque (Nm) attempt
was selected across a one-second torque–time curve plateau,
and the root mean square (RMS) value for each muscle was
calculated. For total muscle electrical activation (EMG
T
), the
RMS values of each muscle of each limb were summed.
Muscle Thickness. Quadriceps femoris muscle thickness was
obtained using a B-Mode ultrasonographic apparatus (Nemio
XG, Toshiba, Japan), with a 7.5 MHz linear array probe (38-
mm length). Before muscle thickness evaluation, each subject
rested for 15 minutes in a supine position with their legs
extended and relaxed to allow fluid shifts to occur (1). The
probe was coated with a water-soluble transmission gel to
provide acoustic contact without depressing the dermal sur-
face. Great care was taken to apply minimal pressure during
scanning to avoid compression of the muscles. Muscle thick-
ness of the RF, VL, vastus medialis (VM), and vastus interme-
dius (VI) were measured at the same sites described in
previous studies (4,12,15,19). All images were digitized and
later analyzed in Image-J software (National Institutes of
Health, version 1.37; USA). Subcutaneous adipose tissue-
muscle interface and the muscle-bone interface were identified
in each image, and the distance between them was accepted as
muscle thickness. Overall quadriceps femoris muscle thickness
(MT QUA
sum
) was calculated from the sum of the four
muscles ( RF + VL + VM + V I) (3,17,19) for each limb followed
by the sum of the right and left. Post-testing measures were
performed 3–5 days after the last training session to avoid any
potential exercise-induced swelling. The same researcher per-
formed all measurements before and after training. These
measurements have demonstrated high reproducibility in our
laboratory and in previous studies (17,19).
Bilateral Index. Bilateral index (BI) was calculated using an
equation proposed previously (8), with peak torque values
(BI
PT
), 1RM values (BI
1RM
) and RMS values (BI
EMG
)
obtained in the bilateral and unilateral (right and left) con-
ditions. The equation is:
BI ð%Þ¼100xBilateral
Unilateral Right þUnilateral Left2100
Positive values indicate that bilateral condition was greater
than the sum of the unilateral conditions (bilateral
Figure 1. Modified lever arm to perform bilateral testing on the
dynamometer.
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Training
1926
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
facilitation), and negative values indicate that bilateral
condition was less than the sum of the unilateral conditions
(bilateral deficit).
Strength Training Program
Training occurred across 12 weeks, consisting of 2 sessions
per week on nonconsecutive days (total of 24 training
sessions). Rest between sessions normally ranged from 48
to 72 hours within a week. The UG performed the knee
extension exercise with 1 leg at a time whereas BG
performed with 2 legs simultaneously. All training sessions
were monitored and supervised by at least 1 experienced
investigator. Apart from the knee extension, subjects per-
formed the following exercises: bilateral knee flexion, bench
press, lateral pull-down, hip abduction, hip adduction,
crunch, biceps flexion, and triceps extension. These exercises
were performed in the same way by both groups and were
included to keep participants interested and motivated.
Participants started all training sessions by the knee exten-
sion exercise.
Training intensity was controlled using the repetition
maximum (RM) method as in previous studies (6,18,19),
thus the heaviest possible weight was used for the designated
number of repetitions for each condition. The intensity was
the same for both training groups. Training for weeks 1–3
was 2 sets of 12–15RM; weeks 4–6 was 3 sets of 9–12RM;
weeks 7–9 was 3 sets of 7–10RM; and weeks 10–12 was 4
sets of 5–8RM. Interset rest interval was 1 minute for weeks
1–3, 2 minutes for weeks 4–9 and 3 minutes for weeks 10–12.
When subjects were able to perform more than the desired
number of repetitions, the load was increased for the next
session in increments from 1.0 to 5.0 kg. All subjects at-
tended more than 80% of the training sessions.
Training Loads. To compare differences in knee extension
training loads between groups, the load used during the last
training session of each mesocycle was considered for
analysis. Loads were expressed as an absolute value (kg).
Loads of each limb for UG were summed for comparison.
Statistical Analyses
All data are presented as means 6SD. Normality, homoge-
neity, and sphericity for outcome measures were tested using
the Shapiro–Wilk, Levene, and Mauchly tests, respectively.
TABLE 1. Maximum dynamic and isometric strength values pre- and post-training, in unilateral and bilateral tests
between groups (means 6SD).*
UG BG CG
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
1RM BIL (kg) 39.0 67.3 46.6 67.2z35.7 67.6 45.5 68.0z36.7 68.1 37.0 69.6
1RM UNI (kg) 38.0 67.8 50.2 68.3z34.9 66.8 43.1 67.339.1 610.0 39.2 610.2
PT BIL (Nm) 286.6 648.3 327.6 657.3z274.2 659.1 307.7 658.0278.5 657.3 265.7 650.7
PT UNI (Nm) 323.7 660.8 390.0 665.8z311.0 662.4 342.5 672.3324.0 655.0 323.9 656.9
*UG = unilateral group; BG = bilateral group; CG = control group; 1RM = one repetition maximum; BIL = bilateral test condition;
UNI = unilateral test condition (right + left); PT = peak torque.
Significantly greater than pre values (p#0.05).
zSignificantly greater than CG at post (p#0.05).
TABLE 2. Total electromyographic activation values, pre- and post-training, in unilateral and bilateral test condition
(means 6SD).*
UG BG CG
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
EMG
T
BIL (mV)
476.0 6110.5 591.4 6136.4 565.8 6264.8 610.9 6208.6 576.7 6380.6 596.69 6357.3
EMG
T
UNI (mV)
523.9 699.0 731.2 6152.7680.9 6265.2 748.0 6288.0 715.8 6401.7 693.9 6256.5
*UG = unilateral group; BG = bilateral group; CG = control group; EMG
T
= total electromyographic activation, sum of vastus
lateralis and rectus femoris muscles of the right and left limbs; BIL = bilateral test condition; UNI = unilateral test condition (right + left).
Significantly greater than pre values (p#0.05).
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca.com
VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 7 | JULY 2016 | 1927
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated
measures was used to examine interactions between time x
group for 1RM, isometric peak torque, EMG
T
, and MT
QUA
sum
values. Whenever a significant interaction was
observed, a paired t-test was used to determine within-
group differences, and a one-way ANOVA to determine
between-group differences for unilateral and bilateral condi-
tions. Analysis of variance also examined interactions
between group 3condition for percent change values for
1RM, isometric peak torque, and EMG
T
measures. When-
ever a significant interaction was observed, a paired t-test
was used to determine within-group differences, and
a one-way ANOVA to determine between-group differences.
A one-sample t-test was used to determine if bilateral index
was significantly different from zero at baseline and post-
testing for BI
1RM
,BI
PT
and BI
EMG
. A 2-way (time 3group)
ANOVA with repeated measures was used to determine
differences in the time course of workloads. Tukey post
hoc tests were used when necessary, to verify differences
between groups. Test-retest reliability of force measurements
(dynamic and isometric) were calculated at baseline for typ-
ical error = standard-deviation of the difference between day
1 and day 2 measurements/O2; and coefficient of variation
(%) = (typical error of the difference between day 1 and day
2/means of day 1 and day 2) * 100 (7). Significance level was
set a priori at p#0.05. All statistical procedures were
performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Scien-
ces (SPSS) version 18.0 software (IBM SPSS, Inc., Chicago,
IL, USA).
RESULTS
There were no significant (p$0.05) differences between
groups at baseline for 1 RM, isometric peak torque, EMG
T
,
MT QUA
sum,
BI
1RM
,BI
PT
,orBI
EMG
.
Maximum Strength (Dynamic and Isometric)
There were significant (p#0.05) time 3group interactions
for 1RM and isometric peak torque where UG and BG sig-
nificantly increased after training but CG showed no change.
Both UG and BG showed greater bilateral 1RM values than
CG at post. However, only UG showed greater values than
CG in the unilateral 1RM test at post. For isometric peak
torque only UG showed greater values than CG for both test
conditions at post (Table 1).
The typical error for 1RM measures was 1.44 kg (3.92%),
1.03 kg (5.70%), and 0.90 kg (5.16%) for bilateral, unilateral
right and left tests, respectively. Typical error for peak torque
measures was 38.50 Nm (10.03%), 15.15 Nm (7.12%), and
20.49 Nm (9.48%) for bilateral, unilateral right and left tests,
respectively.
For 1RM percentage changes, there was a significant (p#
0.05) interaction for group 3condition. The UG and BG
TABLE 3. Sum of muscle thickness values of quadriceps muscles, pre- and post-training (means 6SD).*
UG BG CG
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
MT QUA
sum
(mm) 141.0 621.9 152.8 619.7138.7 613.7 151.0 614.5151.5 618.3 149.2 618.2
*UG = unilateral group; BG = bilateral group; CG = control group; MT QUA
sum
= sum of the quadriceps muscles thickness of the
right and left limbs.
Significantly different of the pre values (p#0.05).
TABLE 4. Percentage values of bilateral index at pre- and post-training (means 6SD).*
UG BG CG
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
BI
1RM
(%) 3.7 614.4 26.5 67.82.6 69.2 5.9 6925.4 613.7 24.7 613.3
BI
PT
(%) 210.5 610.7215.7 67.7211.5 69.929.3 611.3213.8 6210.7217.8 66.7
BI
EMG
(%) 29.5 67.9218.8 69.2217.4 614.6215.3 623.4221.7 611.624.8 622.5
*UG = unilateral group; BG = bilateral group; CG = control group; BI
1RM
= bilateral index with 1 repetition maximum values; BI
PT
=
bilateral index with peak torque values; BI
EMG
= bilateral index with maximal electromyographic activation values.
Significantly different from zero (p#0.05).
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Training
1928
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
increased unilateral 1RM (33.3 614.3% vs. 24.6 611.9%,
respectively) and bilateral 1RM (20.3 66.8% vs. 28.5 6
12.3%, respectively) similarly and both groups showed signifi-
cantly (p#0.05) greater values than the CG in unilateral (0.1 6
5.5%) and bilateral (0.8 65.0%). Moreover, UG showed
a greater (p#0.05) increase in unilateral than in bilateral
whereas the BG was not different. In contrast, for peak torque
percentage values, there was only a significant (p#0.05) main
effect for group. For the unilateral test, UG increased peak
torque values 21.4 610.5% which was significantly greater
(p#0.05) than the BG (14.7 611.3%). In the bilateral test,
groups increased similarly (p$0.05) (UG 14.7 611.3% vs. BG
13.1 612.5%). Both BG and UG showed significantly (p#
0.05) greater values than the CG in both tests.
Muscle Electrical Activity
There was a significant (p#0.05) group 3time interaction
for muscle electrical activity in unilateral only. The UG
showed a significant (p#0.05) increase in maximal EMG
activity values at post training in unilateral (Table 2), show-
ing greater (p#0.05) percentage change (39.9 618.3%) in
comparison to the BG (12.0 621.7%) and CG (5.1 6
21.4%). For bilateral, there was no significant (p$0.05)
difference between UG (25.4 618.0%), BG (15.7 6
31.8%), and CG (6.9 620.7%). The BG and CG showed
no significant increase (p$0.05) on muscle electrical activity
at post training for unilateral and bilateral conditions.
Muscle Thickness
A significant (p#0.05) group 3time interaction was
observed for muscle thickness. The training groups signifi-
cantly (p#0.05) increased MT QUA
sum
at post, while the
CG significantly (p#0.05) decreased it (Table 3). There was
no difference on muscle thickness between training groups
(p$0.05) at post training.
Bilateral Index
At baseline, there were no significant (p$0.05) BI
1RM
values
for any group. At post training BI
1RM
values of the training
groups were significantly different from zero (p#0.05),
indicating bilateral deficit and bilateral facilitation for UG
and BG, respectively (Table 4). For BI
PT,
all groups showed
values significantly lower than zero (p#0.05), and post
training values did not show any significant changes. For
BI
EMG
values, there was a significant difference from zero
(p#0.05) at baseline and post training for both training
groups (Table 4). There was large variability of BI
1RM
between subjects within the same group (Figure 2).
Training Loads
A significant time 3group interaction (p#0.05) for training
load was observed. Both training groups significantly
increased (p#0.05) at every mesocycle, but the UG trained
with a significantly greater (p#0.05) loads in the last mes-
ocyle (Figure 3).
DISCUSSION
The aim of this study was to compare the effects that
unilateral and bilateral strength training have on muscle
strength, neural, and morphological adaptations of the knee
extensors in young women after 12 weeks of training. This
Figure 2. Individual percentage bilateral index with 1 repetition maximum values (BI
1RM
) before and after training. UG = unilateral group; BG = bilateral group;
CG = control group.
Figure 3. Absolute loads used during the training period (mean 6SD).
UG: unilateral group; BG: bilateral group; *Significantly greater than the
previous mesocycle (p#0.05); dSignificantly greater than BG workload
(p#0.05).
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca.com
VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 7 | JULY 2016 | 1929
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
study investigated the responses in a homogenous popula-
tion, and is the first to consider only young women for
training. In general, we found that the 2 forms of training
resulted in increases in quadriceps muscle strength and
thickness after training. Strength increases were not
restricted to the specific training condition, but interestingly
and for the first time, the lateral specificity was shown only
for UG in both strength and muscle activation changes. The
training loads were similar between groups for almost all
training periods, but in the last mesocycle, the UG trained
with greater workload than the BG. Moreover, training
specificity seems to influence the bilateral index differently
when considering isometric or dynamic strength. The BI
1RM
seems to be reduced by bilateral training and raised by uni-
lateral training, whereas BI
PT
values were not altered as
a function of the intervention.
The outcomes of this study relative to maximum strength
gains showed that both UG and BG demonstrated signifi-
cant increases in trained and untrained conditions. In
relation to dynamic strength, our results are in agreement
with others (5,11,13) that have found increases in both bilat-
eral and unilateral strength, after knee extension training
performed bilaterally or unilaterally. Even when only bilat-
eral isokinetic training was performed, Kuruganti et al. (13)
found knee extension strength increases in both conditions
for men and women. However, our results do not support
some previous findings (21), that demonstrated increases in
isokinetic knee extensor strength in men and women only
for BG in the specific trained condition. These authors con-
clude that one of the reasons for this may be the lower initial
physical activity level of subjects included in the BG, thus
demonstrating greater potential for adaptation. Participants
in both training groups of this study had not being involved
with strength training for a similar time (10.2 66 months for
UG and 13 611.6 months for BG) between training groups
and 2 participants in each group had never undertook
strength training routines.
Although the 2 groups increased strength in both test
conditions, Ha
¨kkinen et al. (5) and Janzen et al. (11) showed
a greater percentage change for each group in their specific
trained condition. Our results partially corroborate with
these findings, since only UG showed greater 1RM gains
in the specific trained condition. The BG strength changes
were similar between bilateral and unilateral tests, suggesting
no lateral specificity. It is possible that differences in study
populations, level of physical activity of the subjects, selec-
tion criteria and randomization of the sample may have
influenced these study differences (5,11). To our knowledge
this study is the first that studied only young women.
Ha
¨kkinen et al. (5) investigated adults and older, men and
women, while Janzen et al. (11) studied post-menopausal
women. From the results found in our work, we could sug-
gest that there is no restriction in strength gains only in the
trained condition, but that positive lateral specificity seems
to occur with unilateral training. Unlike the results found for
1RM, maximum isometric strength gains in the unilateral
test condition were greater for UG than BG. All groups
began training with greater peak torque values in unilateral
than bilateral, different than 1RM pre values. Therefore, UG
training maximized unilateral strength gains without ham-
pering bilateral adaptations.
The specificity of isometric strength gains for UG can be
explained by an increase in quadriceps muscle activation.
The percentage of increase was greater for UG in the
unilateral test than the BG, which was similar to that
observed in strength changes. Only UG showed significant
increases in muscle activation in their specific training
condition. Muscle activation was not measured during
maximum dynamic tests which was the specific training
condition. Therefore, we cannot rule out neural mechanisms
involved with maximal isoinertial strength, although it can
be speculated that a transfer of strength and muscular
activation gains may have occurred in the nonspecific test
(isometric) condition.
Regarding morphological responses, few studies have
compared the effects of unilateral and bilateral training on
skeletal muscle adaptations (5,11,13). Some previous inves-
tigations have hypothesized that unilateral training might
allow the use of heavier loads, resulting in greater gains than
bilateral training (11). In our current study, both BG and UG
significantly increased muscle thickness similarly which cor-
roborates previous studies (5,11) examining knee extensor
muscles. Furthermore, the absolute training loads were
greater in UG than BG only in the last mesocycle; so it is
possible to suggest that for longer periods of training, the
difference between loads will be more apparent and could
optimize gains from unilateral training. In a 26-week study
by Janzen et al. (11), UG trained with heavier loads than BG
at 3 time points (pre, mid, and post-training). However, the
authors performed their analysis with percent loads relative
to baseline 1RM values. Moreover, the UG began training
with greater loads.
The bilateral index in the present study was measured for
both 1RM and isometric peak torque. For BI
PT
, both training
groups presented a bilateral deficit at baseline, however nei-
ther group showed bilateral deficit or facilitation before
training in BI
1RM
. According to Jakobi e Chilibeck (10), iso-
metric muscle actions can best represent the bilateral deficit,
because they are more stable than dynamic actions. In addi-
tion, it is possible that during the isoinertial 1RM test, the
difference between loads for unilateral and bilateral is not
pronounced. Accordingly, Janzen et al. (11) and Ha
¨kkinen
et al. (5) did not find significant knee extension 1RM bilateral
deficit at pretraining using a isoinertial equipment. These
results highlight the importance of considering the specific
test designed to measure bilateral deficit. Hence, it seems
that bilateral deficit occurs in maximal isometric and isoki-
netic tests (2), but may be limited when derived from
isoinertial resistance equipment (5,11), suggesting an
action-specific behavior.
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Training
1930
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Performing bilateral strength exercises has been suggested
to reduce the BI (5,11,21,22) because of the greater magni-
tude of increase in bilateral strength, whereas unilateral
training may increase the bilateral deficit according to
a cross-sectional study (8). Our findings regarding BI
1RM
are in accordance with this specificity concept, because the
BG showed bilateral facilitation, whereas bilateral deficit was
evident after training in UG. However, there were no
changes in the bilateral deficit with isometric peak torque
values. Since BI
PT
was large for all groups at pre, it is possible
that the 12 weeks of training was not enough to generate
measurable BI
PT
changes. In addition, the isometric test dif-
fers from specific training condition.
Ha
¨kkinen et al. (5) reported that bilateral training signifi-
cantly increased the ratio of bilateral and unilateral force by
7% after 12 weeks of strength training in the knee extensors
of adults and elderly men and women, while unilateral train-
ing showed a not significant 2% change in 1RM. In the
present study, the percent change of the UG was approxi-
mately 10%, whereas BG showed an increase of approxi-
mately 3%. These divergent results between studies could
be related to variability in the BI values among individuals
of the same group, which can be observed in Figure 2. More-
over in a previous study by Hakkinen et al. (5), there is no
information about individual behavior of the subjects. It is
possible that none of the subjects had a bilateral deficit
before training, unlike our investigation where some subjects
showed a bilateral deficit or bilateral facilitation at baseline.
Considering individual variability in the BI, UG had
uniform changes in the BI
1RM
after training, showing
a reduction in variability, unlike the heterogeneous response
observed in BG. It is possible that less between-subjects var-
iability in unilateral adaptations might have resulted in the
lateral specificity found after unilateral training. Moreover,
Ha
¨kkinen et al. (5) and Janzen et al. (11) did not show any
effect of unilateral training on BI, probably because the per-
centage of change of unilateral and bilateral strength were
similar for UG but not BG, while in present study the BG
had percentage values more similar between conditions that
resulted in only 3% of change in the BI.
The bilateral deficit is probably a result of neural
limitations (16), so it would be expected that lower torque
values in bilateral tests were accompanied by lower levels of
activation. The bilateral index with muscle activation values
was performed only on data obtained during the maximal
isometric test. At pre, all groups showed bilateral deficit for
muscle activation in accordance with the results found in
BI
PT
. At post, both training groups still demonstrated a bilat-
eral deficit, while the CG demonstrated none. Other cross-
sectional studies have not find proportional lower values
between torque and muscle activation (8,9,20).
It should be noted as potential limitation of this study that
it is not possible to extrapolate our results to other muscle
groups and different exercises because only the knee
extension movement was investigated. Furthermore, the
current study was conducted on young women, but no
control for the menstrual cycle variations was done. Thus,
the generalization of the current findings should be done
with caution to other populations and other strength
exercises.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
The use of unilateral or bilateral exercises does not seem to
be decisive in improving neuromuscular adaptations to
strength training in untrained young women. However, if
the training aim is to optimize the increase in force produced
for each lower limb separately, the unilateral training may be
recommended. The increase of BD post unilateral training
means that force in each limb was maximized and more
force is produced for each one separately than simulta-
neously. This may imply in improved performance in daily
activities and in athletic performance during unilateral
movements, such as kicking and running. Although unilat-
eral training enabled the use of heavier training loads, there
were no greater superior gains in muscle mass compared
with bilateral training for 12 weeks. It is worth noting,
however, that longer training periods may have resulted in
greater neuromuscular adaptations in the UG, since differ-
ences in training loads were only evident in the last weeks of
training.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the subjects who volunteered for
this study. The authors also to acknowledge CNPq and
CAPES for their funding support for this study. There are no
conflicts of interest among authors or external funding
sources to disclose. The results of this study do not
constitute endorsement by the authors or the National
Strength and Conditioning Association.
REFERENCES
1. Berg, HE, Tedner, B, and Tesch, PA. Changes in lower limb muscle
cross-sectional area and tissue fluid volume after transition from
standing to supine. Acta Physiol Scand 148: 379–385, 1993.
2. Botton, CE, Radaelli, R, Wilhelm, EN, Silva, BGC, Brown, LE, and
Pinto, RS. Bilateral deficit between concentric and isometric muscle
actions. Isokinet Exerc Sci 21: 161–165, 2013.
3. Cadore, EL, Izquierdo, M, Alberton, CL, Pinto, RS, Conceicao, M,
Cunha, G, Radaelli, R, Bottaro, M, Trindade, GT, and Kruel, LF.
Strength prior to endurance intra-session exercise sequence
optimizes neuromuscular and cardiovascular gains in elderly men.
Exp Gerontol 47: 164–169, 2012.
4. Chilibeck, PD, Stride, D, Farthing, JP, and Burke, DG. Effect of
creatine ingestion after exercise on muscle thickness in males and
females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36: 1781–1788, 2004.
5. Ha
¨kkinen, K, Kallinen, M, Linnamo, V, Pastinen, UM, Newton, RU,
and Kraemer, WJ. Neuromuscular adaptations during bilateral
versus unilateral strength training in middle-aged and elderly men
and women. Acta Physiol Scand 158: 77–88, 1996.
6. Hanssen, KE, Kvamme, NH, Nilsen, TS, Ronnestad, B,
Ambjornsen, IK, Norheim, F, Kadi, F, Hallen, J, Drevon, CA, and
Raastad, T. The effect of strength training volume on satellite cells,
myogenic regulatory factors, and growth factors. Scand J Med Sci
Sports 23: 728–739, 2013.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca.com
VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 7 | JULY 2016 | 1931
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
7. Hopkins, WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and
science. Sports Med 30: 1–15, 2000.
8. Howard, JD and Enoka, RM. Maximum bilateral contractions are
modified by neurally mediated interlimb effects. J Appl Physiol 70:
306–316, 1991.
9. Jakobi, JM and Cafarelli, E. Neuromuscular drive and force
production are not altered during bilateral contractions. J Appl
Physiol 84: 200–206, 1998.
10. Jakobi, JM and Chilibeck, PD. Bilateral and unilateral contractions:
Possible differences in maximal voluntary force. Can J Appl Physiol
26: 12–33, 2001.
11. Janzen, CL, Chilibeck, PD, and Davison, KS. The effect of unilateral
and bilateral strength training on the bilateral deficit and lean tissue
mass in post-menopausal women. Eur J Appl Physiol 97: 253–260,
2006.
12. Korhonen, MT, Mero, AA, Alen, M, Sipila, S, Hakkinen, K,
Liikavainio, T, Viitasalo, JT, Haverinen, MT, and Suominen, H.
Biomechanical and skeletal muscle determinants of maximum
running speed with aging. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 844–856, 2009.
13. Kuruganti, U, Parker, P, Rickards, J, Tingley, M, and Sexsmith, J.
Bilateral isokinetic training reduces the bilateral leg strength deficit
for both old and young adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 94: 175–179,
2005.
14. Kuruganti, U and Seaman, K. The bilateral leg strength deficit is
present in old, young and adolescent females during isokinetic knee
extension and flexion. Eur J Appl Physiol 97: 322–326, 2006.
15. Miyatani, M, Kanehisa, H, and Fukunaga, T. Validity of
bioelectrical impedance and ultrasonographic methods for
estimating the muscle volume of the upper arm. Eur J Appl Physiol
82: 391–396, 2000.
16. Ohtsuki, T. Decrease in human voluntary isometric arm strength
induced by simultaneous bilateral exertion. Behav Brain Res 7:
165–178, 1983.
17. Pinto, RS, Correa, CS, Radaelli, R, Cadore, EL, Brown, LE, and
Bottaro, M. Short-term strength training improves muscle quality
and functional capacity of elderly women. Age 36: 365–372, 2014.
18. Pinto, RS, Gomes, N, Radaelli, R, Botton, CE, Brown, LE, and
Bottaro, M. Effect of range of motion on muscle strength and
thickness. J Strength Cond Res 26: 2140–2145, 2012.
19. Radaelli, R, Botton, CE, Wilhelm, EN, Bottaro, M, Lacerda, F,
Gaya, A, Moraes, K, Peruzzolo, A, Brown, LE, and Pinto, RS. Low-
and high-volume strength training induces similar neuromuscular
improvements in muscle quality in elderly women. Exp Gerontol 48:
710–716, 2013.
20. Schantz, PG, Moritani, T, Karlson, E, Johansson, E, and Lundh, A.
Maximal voluntary force of bilateral and unilateral leg extension.
Acta Physiol Scand 136: 185–192, 1989.
21. Taniguchi, Y. Lateral specificity in resistance training: The effect of
bilateral and unilateral training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 75:
144–150, 1997.
22. Taniguchi, Y. Relationship between the modifications of bilateral
deficit in upper and lower limbs by resistance training in humans.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 78: 226–230, 1998.
23. Vandervoort, AA, Sale, DG, and Moroz, J. Comparison of motor
unit activation during unilateral and bilateral leg extension. J Appl
Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 56: 46–51, 1984.
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Training
1932
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
... However, based on the theory of the bilateral deficit (11), i.e. reduced bilateral force production compared with the summed unilateral force production from the same homologous muscles, this might underestimate the muscle capacity, and hence limit the training result. Furthermore, unilateral strength training has been reported to produce greater increases in muscle strength than bilateral strength training in young women (12). Considering that most TKAs are performed only on 1 knee, and considering the limited training period for patients in an inpatient rehabilitation setting, unilateral strength training seems to be a promising and efficient way to improve strength and flexibility. ...
... Exclusion criteria were a second TKA on the other leg or revision surgery of the affected knee. The sample size was calculated based on previous results from Botton et al. (12), who reported significantly greater changes in strength following unilateral compared with bilateral strength training, with a medium effect size (d = 0.61). Therefore, the minimum number of participants (mixed-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (factors: group (2) and time (2)), medium effect size (η²p = 0.1, f = 0.33), power = 0.8, alpha = 0.05, estimated correlation = 0.6) was calculated to be 9 participants/group, with G*Power (13). ...
... However, in contrast to expectations, the strength gains were not greater in the unilateral training group. A previous study (12) on healthy individuals showed that unilateral strength training is more effective for strength gains than bilateral strength training. Besides the different participants (healthy vs TKA patients), another reason for the difference from the current study could be the short training period of only 3 weeks in this study, including only 6 strength training sessions, while the participants in the study by Botton et al. (12) trained for 12 weeks, including 24 training sessions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Unilateral strength training has been shown to be more effective than bilateral training to increase strength in healthy people. The aims of this study were to test the feasibility of unilateral strength training during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rehabilitation and compare it with standard bilateral training. Methods: Twenty-four TKA patients from an inpatient rehabilitation programme were randomly assigned to unilateral and bilateral strength training groups. Both groups completed 6 strength training sessions during 3 weeks of rehabilitation. Isometric strength, knee joint flexibility, knee circumference, chair rise and walking abilities, and perceived exertion and pain were assessed before and after the training period. Results: Both training groups increased isometric strength of both legs (+17-25%) and flexibility of the affected leg (+7.6%). Improvements in isometric strength of the healthy leg (+23% vs +11%) and flexibility of the affected leg (+10.7% vs +4.5%) were greater in the unilateral training group. Chair rise and 2-min walk test results improved in both groups, to the same extent. Perceived exertion decreased only in the unilateral training group (-20%), while perceived pain did not change in either group. Conclusion: This study showed the feasibility of unilateral strength training in TKA rehabilitation. Strength and flexibility improved similarly or better with unilateral strength training compared with standard bilateral strength training. Future studies should analyse the efficacy of prolonged unilateral strength training following TKA.
... The results of the study support the hypothesis that there are significant differences between bilateral and unilateral exercises. Specifically, the UBP exercise resulted in higher velocities compared to BBP at low and medium loads and ULP resulted in higher velocities compared to BLP when lifting low loads (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45). For the reasons explained in the previous paragraph, these results indicate that the strength deficit is higher in bilateral exercises compared to their unilateral variants. ...
... For the reasons explained in the previous paragraph, these results indicate that the strength deficit is higher in bilateral exercises compared to their unilateral variants. This may be due to unilateral exercises resulting in increased muscle activation compared to bilateral exercises [30]. Higher muscle activation can lead to improved strength production and reduced strength deficit. ...
Article
This study aimed to examine the load-velocity (L-V) relationship in the bench-press (BP) and leg-press (LP) exercises performed unilaterally and to compare this unilateral L-V relationship with their bilateral variants. Nineteen men (age = 23.5 ± 2.1 years) completed two incremental tests in BP and LP performed bilaterally and unilaterally across two sessions with a 48-hour rest period. We found a close relationship between medium propulsive velocity (MPV) and %1RM in unilateral BP (R2 = 0.97, SEE = 0.06 m·s-1) and LP (R2 = 0.96, SEE = 0.06 m·s-1). No significant differences were observed between the preferred and non-preferred sides in the L-V relationship for either exercise. Additionally, higher velocities were achieved in unilateral exercises compared to bilateral exercises, particularly with light and moderate loads (30-70 %1RM) in BP (p < 0.05) and with light loads (30-45 %1RM) in LP (p < 0.05). Close L-V relationships were observed in unilateral exercises, without differences in the L-V relationships between preferred and non-preferred sides despite the interlimb asymmetries in the absolute strength values. Interestingly, lower velocities were observed at light loads (~30-45% 1RM) for bilateral compared to unilateral exercises, which could be explained by different strength deficits for these exercises.
... For isometric exertion, BD has been observed on knee extensors measured by means of isokinetic dynamometer, when for the BL tests, the two limbs exert the torque against the same single bar [15,18,19]. Ye et al. [20] also found BD on elbow flexors during isometric contractions when the UL test was conducted so as the participant's wrist was connected to a load cell by a clamp, whereas for the BL test, both wrists were connected to the load cell through a single metal bar. ...
... Regarding BDI, our results are conflicting with the previous studies, which reported BD during isometric actions [15,18,19], and this might be related to the approach applied to measure the bilateral exertion. In the study of Kuruganti and Murphy [19], the test was performed with the ankles strapped to the input adapter of the dynamometer, which means that the individual pushed and pulled against a single bar during the bilateral test. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose This study measured bilateral deficit (BD) of torque and rate of torque development (RTD) of knee extensors during isometric and concentric tests performed on two isokinetic machines, one for each leg. Methods 36 volunteers performed concentric (60°/s) and isometric repetitions, unilaterally and bilaterally. The BD was measured as BD index (BDI), calculated from the peak torque of concentric, and from the mean torque of the 0.5–2.0 s window of isometric. For isometric, RTD was measured over 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 ms, and for concentric, as the maximal value of the derivate function of torque signal (mRTD). Results The isometric BDI values were evenly distributed about zero and not significantly different from zero (p = 0.751). The comparisons of all RTDs between unilateral and bilateral showed no difference between these conditions (the lower p value was 0.240). From concentric tests, the mean (SD) BDI was −4.5% (6.6), significantly less than zero (p < 0.001), and mRTD was lower during bilateral than unilateral left (p = 0.002) and right (p = 0.002) conditions. No correlation between BDI of isometric and concentric tests was found (r = 0.114, p = 0.506). Conclusion As isometric BDI was zero for torque and RTDs of bilateral showed not to be significantly different of unilateral, it is suggested that there is no BD during isometric test. As isometric and concentric BDI did not correlates, it is carefully suggested that isometric BDI may be accounted for intrinsic random error of measurement, while different mechanism may impact the BDI during non-stationary actions, and further studies with appropriate design should test such hypotheses.
... El término déficit bilateral (DBL) describe la menor producción de fuerza y potencia muscular generada durante las acciones bilaterales al compararla con la suma de las fuerzas del miembro izquierdo y derecho generadas durante las contracciones unilaterales (Škarabot et al., 2016). El DBL parece estar presente en los diferentes tipos de contracción: isocinética Brown et al. (1994), isométrica Botton et al: (2016), y trabajos de la especificidad de cada modalidad deportiva Bogdanis et al;. ...
Article
Full-text available
Resumen El objetivo del presente estudio fue investigar los efectos del déficit bilateral (DBL) en el salto con contra movimiento (CMJ) y su asociación con variables cinemáticas al realizar el test 505 que consiste en realizar un esprint de 15 metros con cambio de dirección (COD). Los participantes (28 jugadores de básquet universitario; edad 24.8 ± 0,6) realizaron saltos CMJ bilaterales y unilaterales. El DBL se calculó a partir de la altura del salto y clasificó en 3 grupos. Los resultados muestran diferencias significativas (< 0,05) en la asimetría entre piernas, tiempo de desaceleración, tiempo de reaceleración, tiempo en cambio de dirección y déficit de cambio de dirección. Al analizar las diferencias entre piernas según la clasificación del DBL no se encontraron diferencias significativas (p > 0,05) en las variables evaluadas. En conclusión se encontró que un mayor DBL tiene efecto en un menor rendimiento en las variables del test 505 y no así al compáralo entre piernas. Palabras clave: Déficit bilateral, salto con contra movimiento, cambio de dirección, esprint
... As is generally the case with sports assessment, wide range of methodologies have been put forward to detect asymmetries. For example, there are muscular strength assessments using isokinetic machines that bear no relation to actual sporting situations and are used, for example, after finishing a training programme (86,87) and also in clinical situations, such as the case study of the ACL injury (88). However, such assessments may carry little correspondence to typical athletic movements. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
he asymmetries detected in the different multi-directional sports vary in magnitude depending on the test selected. Furthermore, in the individual analysis of the different tests administered, it was observed that athlete’s lower limb preferences depended on the test. Greater asymmetries were detected in the vertical jump test, the CODD variable, and the change of direction with inertial resistance test in multidirectional sports. The change of direction with inertial resistance test also enabled us to detect asymmetries in actions that approximate the actual sport. Moreover, the results showed that asymmetries have a negative impact on performance of the jump and the change of direction, and on speed in the linear sprint and the capacity to repeat the change of direction. Last, we were able to observe that iso-inertial training results in greater adaptations in performance and larger reductions in asymmetries than conventional cable-resistance training. We can also affirm that positive adaptations in performance caused by resistance training are not necessarily associated with reduced asymmetries
... These data are very difficult to evaluate, as two studies by Hendrickson and colleagues [51] and Gentil and colleagues [31] merely state that participants were eumenorrheic at the beginning of the intervention. Only two studies [27,38] report the use of contraceptives among participants. Therefore, this quality item was also awarded if menstrual status was checked in any way at the beginning of the study. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Women are underrepresented in resistance exercise-related studies. To date only one meta-analysis provides concrete training recommendations for muscle strength gains through resistance training in eumenorrhoeic women. Objective: This review aims to identify research gaps to advance future study in this area to expand the knowledge concerning resistance exercise-induced strength gains in women and to provide guidelines on the number of repetitions per set and the training frequency per week to enhance maximal muscle strength. Methods: The electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched using a comprehensive list of relevant terms. After checking for exclusion criteria, 31 studies could be included in the final analysis using data from 621 subjects. From these data sets, the ideal number of repetitions per set and also the training frequency per week were analyzed. Results: In the lower body, the largest gains were achieved with 1 to 6 repetitions (17.4% 1RM increase). For lower-body exercises, the highest gains were achieved with 13 to 20 repetitions (8.7% 1RM increase). The lower body should be trained two times a week (8.5% 1RM increase). The upper body should be trained two (5.2% 1RM increase) to three times (4.5% 1RM increase) a week. Conclusion: Women can increase their 1RM by 7.2% per week in the upper body and by 5.2% per week in the lower-body exercises. The upper body can be trained more than two times per week whereas the lower body should be trained two times. Women with intermediate experiences in RT and advanced performance level show more rapid increases in strength in the lower-body compared to the upper-body while no differences were found between upper and lower limb adaptations in RT-beginner subjects.
... bilateral 1RM (6.8% vs. 12.3%) as well as isometric strength (11.3% vs. 12.5%). The unilateral group recorded a higher increase in unilateral strength as well as increased muscle activity [9,10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral training program on changes in the level of speed and speed-strength abilities. Methods: Experimental group 1 (EG1) consisted of 8 young athletes (age = 12.76±1.55 years) and experimental group 2 (EG2) consisted of 8 athletes (age = 12.51±1.59 years) who regularly participate in the training process at a frequency of three times a week. All of our athletes had more than 4 years experiences with regular athletic training 3 times per week prior to this study. During a period of 8 weeks in the preparatory period, such exercises were applied which were performed unilaterally in EG1 and bilaterally in EG2. To determine the effectiveness of takeoff training on change in the level of speed and speed-strength abilities, the following tests were performed: relative strength index (RSI), squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), standing long jump (SLJ), 20 m run from standing start. Results: We found out that in the posttest, the athletes of both groups achieved an improvement in the explosive strength of the lower extremities as well as in the acceleration speed. A significant improvement (p<0.05) was recorded in EG1 in SLJ and in EG2 in RSI. The effect size coefficients showed a large effect in RSI in EG2 and in SLJ in EG1. Conclusion: The results clearly did not confirm a higher effect of the unilateral program in comparison with the bilateral program, but indicated a higher efficiency, especially in the takeoff explosiveness of athletes with a unilateral training program.
Article
Full-text available
Due to its low cost and operational simplicity, ultrasound has been used to monitor muscle thickness in laboratory environments, rehabilitation clinics, and sports clubs. However, it is necessary to determine the measurement’s quality to infer whether the possible changes observed are derived from the treatment or the measurement error. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to determine the validity, reliability, and measurement error of quadriceps femoris muscle thickness obtained by ultrasound in healthy adults. A search was conducted in the Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until April 2022. The study selection process was carried out by two independent researchers, with the presence of a third researcher in case of disagreements. Twenty-six studies were eligible for the review, being 4 of validity, 4 of reliability only, and 18 of reliability and measurement error.The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.60 to 0.99 in validity studies and from 0.44 to 0.99 in reliability studies. The typical error of measurement ranged from 0.01 to 0.47 cm, and the coefficient of variation was from 0.5 to 17.9%. Four studies received “very good” classification in all the risk of bias analysis criteria. Therefore, it is concluded that the quadriceps femoris muscle thickness obtained by ultrasound was shown to be valid, reliable, and to have low measurement errors in healthy adults. The weighted average of the relative error was 6.5%, less than typical increases in resistance training studies. The raters’ experience and methodological care for repeated measurements were necessary to observe low measurement errors.
Article
Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Eine generalisierte Hypermobilität liegt vor, wenn die Beweglichkeit in mehreren Gelenken das übliche Maß übersteigt. Bis zu 30 % der Frauen und 10 % der Männer sind davon betroffen. Hypermobilität ist keine Pathologie, wenn sie jedoch mit Schmerzen und weiteren Symptomen einhergeht, kann sie die Gesundheit und Alltagsfunktionen beeinträchtigen. Zur physiotherapeutischen Behandlung gibt es wenige Studien, wobei Krafttraining eine mögliche Intervention sein könnte. Ziel Erfassung der Machbarkeit und des Effekts eines Krafttrainings für Frauen mit generalisierter Hypermobilität. Methode Pre-post-Studie, in der hypermobile Frauen (Beighton-Score > 5) zwischen 20 und 40 Jahren während 12 Wochen ein Krafttraining an Geräten, fokussiert auf Beine und Rücken, absolvierten. Mithilfe eines Protokolls und wöchentlicher Fragebogen wurden das Training und dadurch ausgelöste Beschwerden analysiert. Vor und nach dem Training wurde die Kraft der Knieflexoren und -extensoren sowie der Muskelquerschnitt am Oberschenkel gemessen. Die Analyse erfolgte primär deskriptiv, zusätzlich erfolgte ein Vergleich von 2 Subgruppen mittels Mann-Whitney-U und Chi2-Test. Ergebnisse 46 Teilnehmerinnen (26,3 ± 4,3 Jahre) absolvierten das Training. 6 davon brachen die Studie vorzeitig ab, davon eine wegen Rückenschmerzen aufgrund einer Diskushernie. 72,5 % der verbleibenden 40 Teilnehmerinnen absolvierten 20 oder mehr Trainings. In 34 % der Trainingswochen wurden geringe Beschwerden angegeben, mehrheitlich an Knie und Rücken. Der Einsatz der verwendeten Gewichte war oft tief, so wurde auf der Legpress mit durchschnittlich 44,8 % des Körpergewichts begonnen, nach 12 Wochen lag das Trainingsgewicht im Mittel bei 52,2 kg, was 85,7 % des Körpergewichts entspricht. Bei der Kraft und beim Muskelquerschnitt wurden keine signifikanten Verbesserungen erreicht, wobei bis zu 17 Teilnehmerinnen (42,5 %) eine Verbesserung von mehr als 10 % erreichten. Schlussfolgerung Das Krafttraining war für die meisten Teilnehmerinnen machbar und gut verträglich. Das mehrheitlich selbstgesteuerte Training war zu wenig intensiv, um eindeutige Auswirkungen auf Kraft oder Muskelmasse zu erreichen, obwohl einzelne Teilnehmerinnen durchaus davon profitierten. In weiteren Studien sollten individuellere und enger begleitete Trainingsprogramme untersucht werden.
Article
Full-text available
To assess effects of a short-term strength training (ST) program on muscle quality (MQ) and functional capacity, 36 sedentary elderly women (age = 66.0 ± 8 year, height = 159.1 ± 9.2 cm, body mass = 68.3 ± 12.1 kg, body fat = 37.0 ± 4.2 %) were randomly divided into an experimental group (EG; n = 19) or a control group (CG; n = 17). The EG performed two to three sets of 12-15 repeats of leg press, knee extension, and knee flexion exercises, 2 days/week for 6 weeks. Before and after training, lower body one repetition maximum (1RM), functional performance tests, quadriceps femoris muscle thickness (MT), and muscle quality (MQ) (1RM and quadriceps MT quotient) were assessed. After training, only the EG showed significant improvements in 1RM (p < 0.05), 30-s sit-to-stand (p < 0.001), and 8 foot up-and-go (p < 0.001). In addition, only in the EG, significant increases in all quadriceps femoris MT measurements (vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, vastus intermedius, and rectus femoris) (p ≤ 0.05), and MQ (p < 0.001) were demonstrated. No changes were observed in the CG. Furthermore, there were significant associations between individual changes in MQ and corresponding changes in 30-s sit-to-stand (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), and 8 foot up-and-go (r = -0.71, p < 0.001). In conclusion, a ST program of only 6 weeks was sufficient to enhance MQ of the knee extensors in elderly women, which resulted in beneficial changes in functional capacity.
Article
Full-text available
The greater torque generation capacity of muscles when contracted alone than in combination with contralateral muscles, characterizes the bilateral limb deficit (BLD) phenomenon. Few studies have explored the BLD in dynamic movements, because isometric actions are considered ideal for evaluating strength. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare BLD between isometric and concentric actions of the knee extensors. Eleven healthy young men (age=20.6 ± 1 yrs; weight=71.4 ± 6.4 kg; height =174.4 ± 7 cm) volunteered to participate. Initially, subjects visited the laboratory for familiarization with the test protocols. On two subsequent randomized days they performed a test protocol with either a unilateral (right and left limbs) or bilateral condition, with 48~h rest between. The test protocol was composed of five isokinetic concentric actions of the knee extensors at 60°/s and three isometric actions at a 60° angle of knee flexion. The greatest peak torque of the two conditions was used for analyses. Both muscle actions demonstrated greater values unilaterally (p< 0.05) than bilaterally and BLD values were not significantly different between them (p> 0.05). Therefore, if muscle torque production is greater unilaterally, athletes and coaches may utilize unilateral exercises to increase training loads.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of low- and high-volume strength training on strength, muscle activation and muscle thickness (MT) of the lower- and upper-body, and on muscle quality (MQ) of the lower-body in older women. Twenty apparently healthy elderly women were randomly assigned into two groups: low-volume (LV, n=11) and high-volume (HV, n=9). The LV group performed one-set of each exercise, while the HV group performed three-sets of each exercise, twice weekly for 13 weeks. MQ was measured by echo intensity obtained by ultrasonography (MQEI), strength per unit of muscle mass (MQST), and strength per unit of muscle mass adjusted with an allometric scale (MQAS). Following training, there was a significant increase (p≤0.001) in knee extension 1-RM (31.8 ± 20.5% for LV and 38.3 ± 7.3% for HV) and in elbow flexion 1-RM (25.1 ± 9.5% for LV and 26.6 ± 8.9% for HV) and in isometric maximal strength of the lower-body (p≤0.05) and upper-body (p≤0.001), with no difference between groups. The maximal electromyographic activation for both groups increased significantly (p≤0.05) in the vastus medialis and biceps brachii, with no difference between groups. All MT measurements of the lower- and upper-body increased similarly in both groups (p≤0.001). Similar improvements were also observed in MQEI (p≤0.01), MQST, and MQAS (p≤0.001) for both groups. These results demonstrate that low- and high-volume strength training promote similar increases in neuromuscular adaptations of the lower- and upper-body, and in MQ of the lower-body in elderly women.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this work was to study the effect of training volume on activation of satellite cells. Healthy untrained men were randomly assigned into two groups. The 3L-1UB group (n = 10) performed three-set leg exercises and single-set upper body exercises, and the 1L-3UB group (n = 11) performed single-set leg exercises and three-set upper body exercises. Both groups performed three sessions (80-90 min) per week for 11 weeks. Biopsies were taken from m. vastus lateralis and m. trapezius. The number of satellite cells, satellite cells positive for myogenin and MyoD, and the number of myonuclei were counted. Homogenized muscle was analyzed for myogenin and MyoD, and extracted ribonucleic acid (RNA) was monitored for selected growth factor transcripts. Knee extensor strength increased more in the 3L-1UB group than in the 1L-3UB group (48 ± 4% vs 29 ± 4%), whereas the strength gain in shoulder press was similar in both training groups. The number of satellite cells in m. vastus lateralis increased more in the 3L-1UB group than in the 1L-3UB group. The number of myonuclei increased similarly in both groups. The messenger RNA expression of growth factors peaked after 2 weeks of training. In conclusion, increasing training volume enhanced satellite cell numbers in the leg muscle, but not in the upper body muscle.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this investigation was to compare partial range-of-motion vs. full range-of-motion upper-body resistance training on strength and muscle thickness (MT) in young men. Volunteers were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (a) full range of motion (FULL; n = 15), (b) partial range of motion (PART; n = 15), or (c) control (CON; n = 10). The subjects trained 2 d · wk(-1) for 10 weeks in a periodized program. Primary outcome measures included elbow flexion maximal strength measured by 1 repetition maximum (1RM) and elbow flexors MT measured by ultrasound. The results indicated that elbow flexion 1RM significantly increased (p < 0.05) for the FULL (25.7 ± 9.6%) and PART groups (16.0 ± 6.7%) but not for the CON group (1.7 ± 5.5%). Also, FULL 1RM strength was significantly greater than the PART 1RM after the training period. Average elbow flexor MT significantly increased for both training groups (9.65 ± 4.4% for FULL and 7.83 ± 4.9 for PART). These data suggest that muscle strength and MT can be improved with both FULL and PART resistance training, but FULL may lead to greater strength gains.
Article
The issue of whether there is a difference in the amount of force produced from a simultaneous two-limb maximal contraction compared to the sum of individual one-limb contractions has received considerable debate in the literature. A bilateral deficit (BLD) is when the resultant force from bilateral homonymous limb contractions is less than the summed force of individual limb contractions. Determining whether differences exist between one-and two-limb movements may provide insight into complex neuromuscular control patterns. Many dynamic two-limb studies report a BLD, whereas isometric studies are more numerous and controversial. It is important to categorize the movements studied in order to establish consistency. This paper purports that the BLD is an unstable phenomenon, and its presence should be considered in the context of the movement studied. Most likely, this phenomenon is dependent upon some minor deviation in descending drive between the cortical level and peripheral motor neuron.
Article
The greater torque generation capacity of muscles when contracted alone than in combination with contralateral muscles, characterizes the bilateral limb deficit (BLD) phenomenon. Few studies have explored the BLD in dynamic movements, because isometric actions are considered ideal for evaluating strength. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare BLD between isometric and concentric actions of the knee extensors. Eleven healthy young men (age = 20.6 ± 1 yrs; weight = 71.4 ± 6.4 kg; height = 174.4 ± 7 cm) volunteered to participate. Initially, subjects visited the laboratory for familiarization with the test protocols. On two subsequent randomized days they performed a test protocol with either a unilateral (right and left limbs) or bilateral condition, with 48 h rest between. The test protocol was composed of five isokinetic concentric actions of the knee extensors at 60 • /s and three isometric actions at a 60 • angle of knee flexion. The greatest peak torque of the two conditions was used for analyses. Both muscle actions demonstrated greater values unilaterally (p < 0.05) than bilaterally and BLD values were not significantly different between them (p > 0.05). Therefore, if muscle torque production is greater unilaterally, athletes and coaches may utilize unilateral exercises to increase training loads.
Maximal voluntary strength of simultaneous bilateral exertion has been shown to be small compared to the sum of the unilateral exertions. Three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of bilateral and unilateral resistance training on this bilateral deficit and to compare these in hands, arms, and legs. In each experiment, the subjects were divided into three groups: unilateral training group, bilateral training group, and control group. The subjects of the training group performed maximal isometric handgrip training in experiment I, and maximal isokinetic arm and leg extension training in experiments II and III. In each experiment, the subjects of the training group continued one of these resistance training exercises three times a week, for 6 weeks. The increase in handgrip strength of the bilateral training group produced in the bilateral condition [5.1 (SEM 2.4)%, after 3 weeks, 6.4 (SEM 2.3) %, after 6 weeks] was significantly greater compared with the control group [-1.1 (SEM 1.0) %, after 3 weeks, -1.5 (SEM 1.1) %, after 6 weeks. The increase in leg extension power of the bilateral training group produced in the bilateral condition [16.1 (SEM 9.6) %, after 3 weeks, 24.1 (SEM 7.4) %, after 6 weeks] was significantly greater compared with the unilateral training group [-5.0 (SEM 3.4) %, after 3 weeks, -3.4 (SEM 4.2) %, after 6 weeks] and the control group [-4.3 (SEM 2.5) %, after 3 weeks, 1.5 (SEM 5.5) %, after 6 weeks]. The increase in handgrip strength of the unilateral training group produced in the unilateral condition [7.3 (SEM 1.7) %, after 3 weeks] was significantly greater compared with the control group [-0.9 (SEM 1.8) %, after 3 weeks]. The increase in arm extension power of the unilateral training group produced in the unilateral condition [7.2 (SEM 1.8) %, after 6 weeks] was significantly greater compared with the bilateral training group [-3.0 (SEM 2.3) %, after 6 weeks] and the control group [-2.1 (SEM 2.6) %, after 6 weeks]. Bilateral indexes (BI) were shifted in a positive direction by bilateral training and tended to shift in a negative direction by unilateral training. With regard to the magnitude of change in BI, there were no significant differences among handgrip, arm extension, and leg extension training. It is suggested that there is lateral specificity in resistance training and that there is no difference among body parts in the modification of bilateral deficit by lateral training.
Article
This study investigated the effects of different intra-session exercise sequences in the cardiovascular and neuromuscular adaptations induced by concurrent training in elderly. Twenty-six healthy elderly men (64.7±4.1years), were randomly placed into two concurrent training groups: strength training prior to (SE, n=13) or after (ES, n=13) endurance training. Subjects trained strength and endurance training 3 times per week performing both exercise types in the same training session. The peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)), maximum aerobic workload (W(máx)), absolute (VT(1) and VT(2)) and relative (VT(1)% and VT(2)%) ventilatory thresholds, as well as workloads at VT(1) and VT(2) (W(VT1) and W(VT2)) were evaluated during a maximal incremental test on a cycle ergometer before and after the training. In addition, muscle quality (MQ) was evaluated by the quotient between maximal dynamic strength (one repetition maximum test) of the knee extensors and the quadriceps femoris muscle thickness determined by ultrasonography. There were no modifications after training in the VT(1), VT(2), VT(1)%, and VT(2)%. There was significant increase in the W(VT1) only in SE (P<0.05), as well as significant increase in the W(VT2) in both groups (P<0.001). There was significant increase in the VO(2peak), with both groups showing increases (P<0.001), with no difference between groups; as well significant increase in the W(máx) (P<0.001) with no difference between SE and ES. The force per unit of muscle mass of knee extensors increased in both groups (P<0.001), but the increase was significantly higher in SE than in ES (27.5±12.7 vs. 15.2±10.3%, P<0.02). Hence, the intra-session exercise sequence had no influence in the maximal endurance power adaptations to concurrent training, but had influence in the magnitude of the muscle quality enhancements.