Conference PaperPDF Available

THE EFFECTS OF E-READING AND PRINTED DOCUMENT READING ON STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION AND RETENTION POWER

Authors:

Abstract

The study attempted to measure the effects of e-reading (reading from the screen of a laptop, tablet or other electronic display) and printed documents reading. Objectives of the study were to measure the effects of e -reading materials on students’ comprehension and their retention power, to investigate the effects of traditional printed documents reading on students’ comprehension and their retention power and measure the differences between the effects of both types of readings (printed and electronic). The study was experimental in nature and from true experimental research design pre-test posttest comparative group design was adopted for the study. Students of B. Ed honor constituted the population of the study. After pre-test students were divided into two groups and one group was presented for ereading and the second group to reading from printed documents. Reading materials wereselected from the subject of research methods in education. Students understanding and retention power was measured through a self-developed test. The collected data were analyzed through Mean, standard deviation and t-paired sample test. Results obtained,illustrated, that students reading from printed documents had more retention power and greater understanding of the text than students who read from screen (e-reading). Students’ retention power was found strongly associated with their interest in the media (E/printed) of reading. Expected causes according to the respondents were students’ concentration, interests, and level of comfort in reading from printed materials than from electronic materials. The study recommended reading of printed materials for better understanding and high retention power of students.
International Conference on Computational and Social Sciences
http://iccss.vfast.org/@ 2015 ICCSS-15
August 25-27, 2015
pp. 408-424
THE EFFECTS OF E-READING AND PRINTED DOCUMENT
READING ON STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION AND
RETENTION POWER
SAJJAD HUSSAIN1, MAKSAL MINAZ2, DR. NASIR AHMAD3,
AND MUHAMMAD IDRIS4
1,3 Center For Education & Staff Training, University of Swat, KPK
2,4Department of Education, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan
sajjadhussain@uswat.edu.pk
ABSTRACT. The study attempted to measure the effects of e-reading (reading from the
screen of a laptop, tablet or other electronic display) and printed documents reading.
Objectives of the study were to measure the effects of e -reading materials on students’
comprehension and their retention power, to investigate the effects of traditional
printed documents reading on students’ comprehension and their retention power and
measure the differences between the effects of both types of readings (printed and
electronic). The study was experimental in nature and from true experimental research
design pre-test posttest comparative group design was adopted for the study. Students of
B. Ed honor constituted the population of the study. After pre-test students were
divided into two groups and one group was presented for ereading and the
second group to reading from printed documents. Reading materials wereselected
from the subject of research methods in education. Students understanding and
retention power was measured through a self-developed test. The collected data were
analyzed through Mean, standard deviation and t-paired sample test. Results
obtained,illustrated, that students reading from printed documents had more
retention power and greater understanding of the text than students who read from
screen (e-reading). Students’ retention power was found strongly associated with their
interest in the media (E/printed) of reading. Expected causes according to the
respondents were students’ concentration, interests, and level of comfort in reading
from printed materials than from electronic materials. The study recommended
reading of printed materials for better understanding and high retention power of
students.
Keywords: Electronic Reading, Printed Document Reading, Comprehension, Retention
Power
1. Introduction. Reading is the foundation of all formal and informal learning. Future success is dependent
on the learners’ reading ability. It is the gateway to success-the amount of time students spends in reading is
the indicator of successful academic life in future {Wigfield, Guthrie, Perencevich, & Taboada, 2008}.
Students initial education concentrates on basic skills such as listening, speaking, reading and writing.
Speaking is a source of communicating ideas to others which is suitable for present audience, speaking skills
of students cannot be developed till the time they get competence in listening skills. Listening skill provide
base for strong speaking skills. In the same way there is vital connection between reading and writing. Good
writers are always good readers and vice versa {Parrish & McGlinn, 2002}.
There are various reading methods and techniques, adopted according to the mental level of the
students, keeping in view the nature of the materials to be read; for example, loud reading, silent reading,
controlled reading, guided reading, free reading, feedback reading and other reading skills like extensive and
intensive reading and skimming and scanning. Every reading technique has its own philosophy which
channelizes it in
408
its own fashion with its own merits and demerits. Learners are taught reading formally at primary level with
training in phonemic awareness, alphabet principles and word sound recognition to develop their skills of
transforming words into exact sounds (Pronunciation) which enable them to read fluently and accurately. At
primary level loud reading is preferred as to identify and correct students’ mistakes in reading. Once they
become skilled readers they are advised to read silently so as to comprehend and enjoy the text {Chiong,
Erickson, Takeuchi , & Ree, 2012}.
With the emergence of electronic media, books, research periodicals, journals, magazines, news-papers and so
many other reading materials were transformed into electronic text. The expenses of paper and allied
materials used in the printing of books and other reading materials were considered wastage of materials,
money and human energy, that is why in the United States of America the purchase of e-books have surpassed
the printed books and magazines today {Jones & Brown , 2011}. E-reading materials and convergence of
printed reading materials into electronic format have not only increased the access opportunities throughout
the world for readers but also have reduced the expenses. There are evidences for the support of e-reading
materials particularly in term of access, quality, beauty, effectiveness and learning for students and general
people {Korat & Shamir, 2008}. Readers’ attitude towards e-reading and printed reading materials is crucial
in term of understanding and retention. Learners’ reading experiences influence their beliefs about the
effectiveness and ineffectiveness of reading materials. A reader who is habitual of printed reading materials
and haven’t got any practice of reading from e-materials would not be able to benefit from e-materials {Jones
& Brown , 2011}.
It is often, that during teaching reading for comprehension emphasize is given to the ends of the activity
(product) while process is ignored which is very important. However, the process of comprehension includes
two approaches, monitoring approach where the reader is monitored and corrected on the spot; readers’
monitoring identify weak areas of learners’ reading which may include words, sentences and para reading and
sometime it also includes the logical sequence of reading materials which not only make the learner a
competent reader but also a good writer. The second approach concentrates on the creative aspect of reading
where the reader is informed with clues of reading materials; they are sensitized for evaluating, criticizing and
hypothesizing the reading materials. This approach also familiarized the reader with summarization and
conclusive comments on the text {Collins, Smith, & Beranek, 2007}.
Readers reading skills, their comprehension and retention power is strongly affected by the nature of the
reading materials. The nature of reading materials-that is essay, poetry, novel, report or news and striking
words usage or the different styles of writing; apart from these the printed and non-printed (electronic style)
of reading materials are also significant in affecting readers’ comprehension and retention capacity {Collins,
Smith, & Beranek, 2007}. According to the learning laws presented by famous US psychologist Edward
Thorndike, the effects of learning remain strong if it is based on the interest of the learner. He basically
presented three basic laws of learning; law of readiness, law of exercise and law of effect. To generalize these
laws to learners’ readings, if learners are provided the type of reading materials in which they take interest;
they would be ready to stick to the reading materials for a long time which will lead for a stronger effect
because time matters.
There are two main approaches with regards to reading materials; one is electronic reading materials and the
second is printed script reading material. All the 21st century readers are in touch with both of these
approaches and both have their own merits and demerits but have different effects on learners too. For
example the readers who are habitual in reading printed reading materials are good at reading and
comprehending that sorts of reading materials as compared to the ones reading e-reading materials and vice
versa.
1.1 Theoretical Background and Problem of the Study
Interest, flexibility, and time duration of reading have significant relationship with comprehension of readers.
Taking into consideration the element of interest, e-reading materials are attractive and invitational in nature,
but most of the time readers are unable to focus and concentrate on some specific materials which negatively
409
affect readers comprehension {Moody, 2010; El-Mouelhy, Poon, Hui, & Sue-Chan, 2013}. As far as
flexibility is concerned, they are flexible in nature as compare to the printed materials as a reader can read it
anywhere anytime through his tablet, mobile phone or laptop; however, all these equipments are electronic
and areas where we are short of power, these opportunities cannot be availed to the fullest. Lastly, according
to Robert and Barber {2013} the time expenditure on reading in these reading format are also different.
Reading from printed documents takes less time as compared to reading from non-printed documents. It is
also a notable fact the readers can read a book, magazine, newspaper or book in printed form for a long time
and they don’t feel boredom/hesitation as compare to reading in electronic form which most of the time
affects their concentration. Keeping in view these two types of readings, the study aims to distinguish
between them, the one that is more effective for readers’ in terms of comprehension and retention power.
1.2 Study Objectives
Main objectives of the study were;
1. To measure the effect of e-reading materials on students’ comprehension and their retention power.
2. To estimate the effect of traditional printed documents reading on students’ comprehension, and their
retention power.
3. To quantify the differences between e-readers and printed document readers comprehension and
retention power.
1.3 Study hypotheses
Null hypotheses were formulated on the basis of objectives framed which were;
1. There is no significant effect of e-reading materials on students’ comprehension and their retention
power.
2. There is no significant effect of traditional printed documents reading on students’ comprehension,
and their retention power.
3. There are no significant differences between e-readers and printed document readers’ comprehension
and retention power.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Bill Gates discussing one of the project of Microsoft “Anytime Anywhere Learning” and was of the view that
technological developments have affected every aspect of human life. It has provided great opportunities to
students in their learning as well as their access to laptop and other scientific equipments which facilitate them
in learning. Gates’ claim that learning is no more confined to classroom walls, has been proved by laptops,
PCs, mobiles and tablets as these equipments have enabled every student to connect to the world of learning
at his own pace and level {BBCNEWS, 2000}.
The introduction of computer and internet into the world of education has given new dimensions to
educational and educational resources. Once Libraries were considered great resources of educational
materials for students and teachers. These libraries were enriched with valuable books related to almost every
subject as well as research dissertations and other periodical journals. All these documents were available in
printed form and were accessed and available only to the local people. Moreover, the printed materials were
not only expensive but also had negative effects on environment and leads to environmental pollution {Korat
& Shamir, 2008}.
The introduction of these information communication technologies compelled developed countries to work
for the transformation of printed documents (books, reports, scripts and other educational materials and
informative magazines) into electronic and scanned materials so as to make these materials available to
students in particular and others in general. In addition, different projects and efforts have been made to
transform the already available printed documents into screened form through scanning and re-composing and
other measures; one among these projects was Large-scale Digitalization Project in 2007 by the University of
Illinois at Urbana Campaign library where a huge number of printed books were scanned and were uploaded
to internet for e-readers {Collins, Smith, & Beranek, 2007}. Such sorts of efforts were also made by the
Higher Education Commission of Pakistan where all the PhD dissertations were scanned, important reports,
410
books, and periodicals were scanned and re-composed for e-readers and which are available on e-prints, and
HEC digital library.
Such a huge investment in this area has positive contribution to the overall learning spares of life from
environment to classroom teaching. Teacher in a very short span of time can collect the needed information
for his teaching; students can make themselves prepared for the classroom learning; universities and other
institutions can disseminate their work and service to its clients in a very easy and accessible way and so on.
To determine which one between the two is more effective for the students, comparison of these reading
styles have been done in different areas of the world with different grade students. In the study of {Jones &
Brown , 2011} elementary school grade two students were engaged in reading of e-reading materials and
printed reading materials. Results of that study showed that students took more interest in e-reading materials
as compared to printed document reading.
Chiong, Erickson, Takeuchi, and Ree {2012} studied students’ and their parents’ converstaion, story
comprehension and engament in reading from e-books and printed books. Findings illustratedthat parents and
childern had good conversation in printed books than e-books that usually focus on non content materials
which brcomes a cause of concentration distraction in reading. Story studied in e-story books are less
comprehensive than printed story books; hence, the later is more helpful in the development of content
literacy of students.
Roberts and Barber {2013} viewed reading format as one of the factor that affect students comprehension.
Readings from e-reading and printed reading have no significant differences in the comprehension of
independent readers. Studies organized by National Reading Panal have studied different aspects of research
in reading regarding the format of reading materials and also recommended further studies in this context.
Additional studies of {Grimshaw, Dungworth, McKnight, & Morris, 2007; Korat & Shamir, 2008;Shamir,
2009} investigated the relationship between the formate of reading materials and students reading
comprehension and engagment in reading.
American Association of School Libraries adovcated that the 21st century learners must have a good
command on both formats of reading. They need to have competence in comprehending, analyzing and
evaluating text as they have to confront in their lives with both of these sources {American Association of
School Librarian, 2007}. A plan issued by US Department of Education {2010} argued to provide wireless
access to internat and allied technological equipments to all the educators and students of all level for the
purpose to enable them to deal effectively with the demands of the 21st century. These reports might motivate
the researchers to know the effectiveness of these measures in the students’academic lives in general and
reading comprehension and retention power in particular. Because reading habits, reading comprehension and
retention power of students are the core areas of their future success. Results obtained from research studies
on reading comprehension using the electronic format of reading materials are not as clear as it need to be.
Some studies found no statistcial difference among e-readers and printed document readers while some other
found printed document readers superority to e-readers in comprehension and even in retention powers
{Roberts & Barber, 2013}.
3. Methodology and Procedures
The study was experimental in nature. Pretest Post-Test Comparative Group Design was adopted for the
study. Two groups were formed from the students of B. Ed. Efforts were made to equalize the groups,
eighteen students were in experimental and eighteen in control group. They were pre-tested and then were
provided with these two reading approaches. Reading materials were selected from the subject of Research
Methods in Education. Equal time was given for reading to both the groups and equal guidance along with
teaching support they were prepared for reading.
Students’ reading understanding was measured through a self-developed test which was again administered to
both the groups for the purpose of estimating their retention power. The test was contained on paragraphs and
questions were given in the end. Total time for the test was one hour where six paragraphs were included in
411
the test; each paragraph in the test was about seven lines in length, which were followed by three to four
questions asking for short answers, measuring students understanding.
Pre-test was given to all the students with printed documents while the posttest of the study was given to each
group according to the nature of their treatment (electronic/printed reading). A rubric was developed for the
scoring of students’ tests scores. The rubric was used to ensure the objectivity in scoring process. Before the
administration of the pre and post test its reliability was calculated. It was administered to ten students of B.
Ed and the data were placed in SPSS version 16. The reliability co-efficient value of the test was .63 which
was acceptable. Only two statements in 4th paragraph were changed. To ensure the validity it was discussed
with English and research teachers in the departments and changes were brought about in the test items.
All the collected data were placed in SPSS version 16 and the data were categorized and with descriptive and
inferential statistics. Mean scores, standards deviation and t-paired sample test were applied to the data.
Differences between the performances in experimental and control groups were calculated through mean
scores difference and t-test.
4. Analysis and interpretation
The collected data were placed into SPSS version 16 t-paired sample test was applied to analyze the data.
Tables and its interpretations are as follows;
Table no 4.1. Experimental and control groups on pre-test
Study Groups
Mean
Scores
M.S
Diff
t-value
Sig
r
Sig
Experimental
09.67
.3437
1.097
.274
.312
.000
Control
09.33
Table 4.1 shows the performances of control (printed Document readers) and experimental (e-readers) groups’
students. There is significant co-relation in the scores of both the groups while the mean differences among
the groups are very low (.3437) and t value is1.097 which is not significant as the significant level is higher
than .05. So it could be concluded that there are no significant differences in the performances of both groups.
Table no 4.2. Experimental and control groups on post-test
Study Groups
Mean
Scores
M.S
Diff
t-value
Sig
r
Sig
Experimental
13.95
.9765
3.489
.001
.526
.000
Control
12.98
The table 4.2 demonstrates a high co-relation in the performances of control and experimental group students.
The mean difference is also higher than the pre-test that is .9765 which is near to 1 (one) and the t value is
3.489 and is also significant as well at .001. These results show that the control group students (printed
document readers) have higher comprehension than the experimental group students (e-readers). The
difference is not very high but contribute to printed document readers superiority. Therefore the hypothesis
made at the start of the study that e-reading materials have no significant effects on e-readers’ comprehension
has been accepted while printed document had significant effects on students comprehension therefore the
stated hypothesis is rejected with H1 that there is significant effects of printed documents on readers’
comprehension.
412
Table no 4.3. Retention of Experimental and control group students
Study Groups
Mean
Scores
M.S
Diff
t-value
Sig
r
Sig
Experimental
13.12
1.164
3.987
.000
.249
.000
Control
11.96
The r value in the above table 4.3 is .349 which is significant at .000, the mean difference between control and
experimental groups is 1.164, and t value is 3.987 which is significant at .000. All these results explain that
students of control group have higher retention power and can retain the information for a long time as
compared to the students’ experimental group. However, with regards to retention power the hypothesis made
for e-readers is accepted as it doesn’t has significant effects of students retentions while for printed document
readers the hypothesis made was rejected and H1was formed that there is significant effects of printed
documents reading materials on readers’ retention power.
5. Discussions and Conclusions
Reading is one of the basic skills of learners; therefore they need to attain command in it. Reading material
formats have close co-relationship with students’ reading comprehension. Roberts and Barber {2013} were of
the view that there is no such relationship between reading material formats (e-reading) with students
comprehension which is rejected by the results of this study while the results of {Chiong, Erickson, Takeuchi
, & Ree, 2012} has been accepted as the results supports their findings. E-reading is difficult in focus, mind
and body adjustment also contribute to readers’ distraction which affects their comprehension capacity.
Reading comprehension leads to critical reading. It enables the reader to retain the information that he/she has
comprehended for a long time. The present study results also support the claim that the reading of printed
documents instead of electronic materials has high and positive effects on students reading and their
understanding {Korat & Shamir, 2008}. On the other hand {American Association of School Librarian, 2007;
Moody, 2010; U.S Department of Education, 2010} and some other studies are emphasizing on the need of e-
reading and the use of technological equipments in the teaching learning process and according to standards
for the 21st century learners the reading competence in both format of reading, its comprehension, critical
analysis and creative evaluation of reading materials are essential.
It is therefore recommeded that students may be provided all the necessary materials in printed as well as in
screened format so that they could attain the desired target.According to the results of this study students and
concerned authorities are recommended to provide the students good reading materials in printed form on
priority basis and in screened format as well to ensure students comprehension and retention power. Future
researchers are advised to study the same area with a lower level students that is primary level and in some
language subjects like regional or international language.
REFERENCES
[1] Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2007). Electronic books: children’s reading
and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology , 38 (4), 583-599.
[2] American Association of School Librarian. (2007). Standards For the 21st Century Learners.
[3] BBC NEWS. (2000). Gates wants laptop for every pupil. World Service Education BBC.
[4] Chiong, C., Erickson, I., Takeuchi , L., & Ree, J. (2012). Print Books vs. E-books; Comparing parent-
child co-reading on print, basic, and enhanced e-book platforms. New York, NY 10023: The Joan Ganz
Cooney Center.
[5] Collins, A., Smith, E. E., & Beranek, B. (2007). Teaching the Process of Reading Comprehension. Illinio:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project.
[6] El-Mouelhy, I., Poon, I. H., Hui, A. N., & Sue-Chan, C. (2013). Does a Creative Learning Medium
Matter? Impact of Low Cost Android Tablets on Elementary Students’ English Comprehension,
Perceived Performance and Memory Retention. Creative Education, Scientific Research , 4 (12B), 42-50.
413
[7] Jones, T., & Brown , C. (2011). Reading Engagement: A Comparison Between E-Books And Traditional
Print Books In An Elementary Classroom. International Journal of Instruction , 4 (2), 5-22.
[8] Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2008). The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children’s
emergent literacy in low versus middle SES groups. ScienceDirect, Computers & Education , 50, 110-
124.
[9] Moody, A. K. (2010). Using Electronic Books in the Classroom to Enhance Emergent Literacy Skills in
Young Children. Journal of Literacy and Technology , 11 (4), 22-27.
[10] Parrish, & McGlinn. (2002). Accelerating ESL Students’ Reading Progress with Accelerated Reader.
Reading Horizons , 3 (42), 175-189.
[11] Roberts, M. C., & Barber, C. R. (2013). Effects of Reading Formats on the Comprehension of New
Independent Readers. Journal of Literacy and Technology , 14 (2), 24-37.
[12] Shamir, A. (2009). Processes and outcomes of joint activity with ebooks for promoting kindergarteners'
emergent literacy. Educational Media International , 46 (1), 81-96.
[13] U.S Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by
technology. Washington, D.C: Department of Education, USA.
[14] Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., & Taboada, A. (2008). Role of Reading Engagement in
Mediating Effects of Reading Comprehension Instruction on Reading Outcomes. Psychology in the
Schools , 4 (45), 432-445.
414
... Regarding e-reading, Hussain et al. [50] sought to compare the impact of reading from a laptop/tablet screen versus reading printed texts. e effects of e-reading materials on students' understanding and ability to retain information are quantified, the impact of conventional printed document reading is examined, and the disparities between the impact of both forms of readings (printed and electronic) are measured. ...
... ere are more difficult multiple-choice questions and a cloze exam in the second section (41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60) Using the participants' textbook as a guide, the researcher created a reading pretest to collect information on the students. It was a reading comprehension exam with 20 objective items, all of which were read aloud. ...
... ey discovered that participants in their study preferred paper-based books and that the same conventional approach was used to all reading tasks without any differentiation. Similarly, our study is incompatible with Hussain et al. [50], who measured the impacts of e-reading and printed document reading. According to their findings, participants who read from printed materials retained more information and had a better knowledge of the text than those who read from a computer screen did (e-reading). ...
Article
Full-text available
Considering the development of technology in the current era, the present research aimed at investigating the effects of reading digital texts vs. reading printed texts on developing Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension. To this end, the Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT) was administered to 93 language learners, and 60 of them whose level was intermediate were selected. Then, they were assigned to two groups: one CG and one EG. After grouping the participants, a reading pretest was administered to gauge the participants’ reading comprehension before conducting the treatment. After that, ten digital texts in the format of PDF with their audio files were instructed to the EG. On the other hand, the same texts were taught to the CG in a printed format. After teaching all texts, a reading posttest was administered to both groups to measure the effects of the treatment on their reading comprehension. The gained data were analyzed using paired samples and independent samples t-tests. The findings illustrated that both digital and printed texts helped the participants to improve their reading comprehension, but digital texts were more effective than printed ones. In other words, the EG participants trained by the digital texts outflanked the CG participants taught through the printed texts. The implications of this study can inspire both English teachers and learners to use digital texts in their teaching and learning.
... Further, they described two types of material aids in the learning and teaching process. E-reading material has excellent value in student's comprehension and retention power [25]. ...
... It is also revealed from the results of this study that flipped learning helped develop 21st-century skills such as communication, thinking, interpersonal, and self-direction among students of public schools to deal with the challenges of the 21st century. Hussain, Minaz, Ahmad, and Idris [25] also highlighted the same idea in their study that flipped classroom advocates group learning activities, teachers must guide and facilitate group leaders to manage and organize activities by enhancing 21st-century skills. Findings also showed the significance of flipped classroom approach as a high number of students agreed that for the other part of a flipped learning approach, their teachers engage them in group activities, discussions, mind mapping, or brainstorming activities to make the learning environment conducive. ...
Article
Full-text available
This research focuses on the increasing dependency on flipped classrooms with the merger of distance teaching and learning instead of face-to-face classrooms during the pandemic, which impacted student’s performance and learning post-pandemic. The primary purpose of this research study was to identify support, motivation, participation, collaboration, assessment, and feedback gained through the use of flipped classrooms with the merger of distance teaching instead of a physical classroom in the pandemic situations and the challenges faced by teachers in using flipped classroom. The main intention is to analyze flipped classroom effectiveness as an emerging concept in a pandemic situation. In this research, a methodology is recommended step by step below in the methodology section—a quantitative research method used to collect accurate and reliable results. A survey research method was used in this study. The populations of 90–73 respondents among higher secondary grade students of the public school in Sukkur were selected for data collection. For managing the data, SPSS statistics software was used. In inferential statistics, an independent-samples t-test was used for the analysis of data. The results were analyzed based on gender mean score. The significant findings from this study suggested that the flipped classroom is a practical learning approach that enhances student engagement, performance, and learning in the class. It is summed up that a large number of students favoured the flipped classroom approach over traditional pedagogy. This study will help to further integrate this approach into higher levels of institutions by keeping in mind its effectiveness and hindrances in Pakistan.
... Digital technologies have transformed how we engage with educational materials (Järvelä et al., 2021). With the increasing use of digital texts in formal and informal education (Hussain et al., 2015), understanding learners' cognitive processes in digital reading has become more critical (Shaughnessy, 2020). It is a foundation for learning analytics (LA) and designing timely and effective interventions for learners who engage in digital reading (Wang, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Learner behaviours often provide critical clues about learners' cognitive processes. However, the capacity of human intelligence to comprehend and intervene in learners' cognitive processes is often constrained by the subjective nature of human evaluation and the challenges of maintaining consistency and scalability. The recent widespread AI technology has been applied to learning analytics (LA), aiming at a more accurate, consistent and scalable understanding of learning to compensate for challenges that human intelligence faces. However, machine intelligence has been criticized for lacking contextual understanding and difficulties dealing with complex human emotions and social cues. In this work, we aim to understand learners' internal cognitive processes based on the external behavioural cues of learners in a digital reading context, using a hybrid intelligence (HI) approach, bridging human and machine intelligence. Based on the behavioural frameworks and the insights from human experts, we scope specific behavioural cues that are known to be relevant to learners' attention regulation, which is highly relevant for learners' cognitive processes. We utilize the public WEDAR dataset with 30 subjects' video data, behaviour annotation and pre–post tests on multiple choice and summarization tasks. We apply the explainable AI (XAI) approach to train the machine learning model so that human evaluators can also understand which behavioural features were essential for predicting the usage of the cognitive processes (ie, higher‐order thinking skills [HOTS] and lower‐order thinking skills [LOTS]) of learners, providing insights for the next‐round feature engineering and intervention design. The result indicates that the dominant use of attention regulation behaviours is a reliable indicator of low use of LOTS with 79.33% prediction accuracy, while reading speed is a valuable indicator for predicting the overall usage of HOTS and LOTS, ranging from 60.66% to 78.66% accuracy, highly surpassing random guess of 33.33%. Our study demonstrates how various combinations of behavioural features supported by HI can inform learners' cognitive processes accurately and interpretably, integrating human and machine intelligence. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Human attention is a cognitive process that allows us to choose and concentrate on relevant information, which leads to successful learning. In affective computing, certain behavioural cues (eg, attention regulation behaviours) are used to indicate learners' attentional states during learning. What this paper adds Attention regulation behaviours during digital reading can work as predictors of different levels of cognitive processes (ie, the utilization of higher‐order thinking skills [HOTS] and lower‐order thinking skills [LOTS]), leveraged by computer vision and machine learning. By developing an explainable AI model, we can predict learners' cognitive processes, which often cannot be achieved by human observations, while understanding behavioural components that lead to such machine decisions is critical. It can provide valuable machine‐driven insights into the relationship between humans' external and internal states in learning. Based on the frameworks spanning cognitive AI, psychology and education, expert knowledge can contribute to initial feature selection and engineering for the hybrid intelligence (HI) model development and next‐round intervention design. Implications for practice and/or policy Human and machine intelligence form an iterative cycle to build a HI to understand and intervene in learners' cognitive processes in digital reading, balancing each other's strengths and weaknesses in decision‐making. It can eventually inform automated feedback loops in widespread e‐learning, a new education norm since the COVID‐19 pandemic. Our framework also has the potential to be extended to other scenarios with digital reading, providing concrete examples of where human intelligence and machine intelligence can contribute to building a HI. It represents more systematic supports that apply to real‐life practices.
... Other results of past studies show that students prefer traditional printed text over digital text (Kazanci, 2015). Another study in 2015 conducted by Ahmad et al. (2015) shows results that student who focused more on printed documents or materials tend to comprehend information better than those who read from the screen. However, among all related studies that have been reviewed, they have yet to focus on the matter in the specific context of our city, and only a few focused on the Reading Efficiency or the Reading Efficiency Index of the students in using both formats (i.e., Print and Digital). ...
Article
Full-text available
The texts and other resources teachers use to help students develop their literacy skills are referred to as classroom reading materials. These include textbooks, workbooks, picture books, online resources, and other resources to help students improve their reading performance. In the 2018 PISA results, the Philippines ranked the lowest in terms of reading literacy (DepEd, 2019), and over 80% did not reach a minimum level of proficiency in reading (OECD, 2019). Reading Efficiency is a critical component of reading proficiency (Reading Plus, 2019) and is commonly associated with reading speed and comprehension (Berget & Fagernes, 2021). Students who read efficiently focus more on understanding the text's actual meaning than on the mechanics of reading (Reading Plus, 2019). Many studies have been conducted about reading comprehension and reading materials; however, only a few are about reading efficiency. In the present study, students' reading efficiency in using printed and digital materials was examined. Thirty-four students were examined through a 10-item questionnaire and two sets of tests-one for the Print Material and one for the Digital Material. For the first test (Printed Material), the overall scores of the students were 87.38, and for the second test (Digital Material), the overall score of the students was 92.29, which shows that students got a higher score in reading efficiency on the test for the Digital Material than the Printed Material. However, results showed that there is no significant difference between the reading efficiency of 2nd year BSED major in English using both formats. Thus, educators should consider incorporating both formats in their instructional approaches, considering that there's no significant difference in the students reading efficiency in using Print or Digital material.
Article
Full-text available
In-practice traditional lecture, discussion and assignments based pedagogical practices play its role in students' learning and retention power. The current study intends to investigate whether authentic pedagogical practices are more effective in terms of enhancing students' educational performances and retention power or the traditional pedagogical practices. Therefore, this study focused on investigating the effects of authentic and traditional pedagogical practices on students' educational performances and retention power at secondary level. The objective was to measure the effects of authentic and traditional pedagogical practices on students' educational performances and retention power. A pre-test post-test comparative group design was adopted to conduct the study. The students of experimental group were exposed to authentic pedagogical practices while the control group was treated on traditional routine pedagogical practices. Data from the experimental and control group were collected through a self-developed test. Thrice was the test administered to both groups, the collected data were analyzed through Mean, Standard Deviation and independent sample t-test. Results of the study concludes that students of experimental group performed higher on the post-test than the students of control group, the performance of experimental group was also better as
Article
In-practice traditional lecture, discussion and assignments based pedagogical practices play its role in students’ learning and retention power. The current study intends to investigate whether authentic pedagogical practices are more effective in terms of enhancing students’ educational performances and retention power or the traditional pedagogical practices. Therefore, this study focused on investigating the effects of authentic and traditional pedagogical practices on students’ educational performances and retention power at secondary level. The objective was to measure the effects of authentic and traditional pedagogical practices on students’ educational performances and retention power. A pre-test post-test comparative group design was adopted to conduct the study. The students of experimental group were exposed to authentic pedagogical practices while the control group was treated on traditional routine pedagogical practices. Data from the experimental and control group were collected through a self-developed test. Thrice was the test administered to both groups, the collected data were analyzed through Mean, Standard Deviation and independent sample t-test. Results of the study concludes that students of experimental group performed higher on the post-test than the students of control group, the performance of experimental group was also better ascompared to the control group on the test of retention power. Keeping in view the results that data yielded, it was recommended that teachers at secondary level may follow authentic pedagogical practices as compared to other traditional ones. Based on the findings of the study relevant and applicable recommendations were made.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Android tablet is a relatively newer and cheaper portal electronic device that can be used as a creative learning tool in elementary school setting compared with laptop. However, the effect of Android tablet on students’ learning performance has been rarely studied. Before encouraging schools to implant Android tablet in teaching process, it should be ensured that tablet should at least do no harm on students’ academic performance. This research aims to investigate the impact of an innovative medium—a low cost Android tablet versus paper—on elementary students’ reading comprehension, perceived comprehension performance, and memory retention, and discuss about the implication of the finding and future directions. Method: In Study 1, 18 fourth-graders and 36 sixth-graders read 2 grade-appropriate passages on either a tablet or paper and completed related comprehension tests, then assessed their perceived performance. In Study 2, 16 first-graders attempted to memorize 25 pictures displayed on tablets while another 12 first-graders attempted to memorize 25 pictures displayed on paper. After 1 minute filler activity, participants were shown 50 pictures and asked to identify those they had attempted to memorize. Results: In Study 1, results showed that fourth-graders comprehended better when reading on paper, whereas sixth-graders scored similarly on both media. An interaction effect between “medium” and “gender” was found in the perceived performance of fourth-graders, with boys reporting higher perceived performance when using tablets. In Study 2, first-graders experienced better memory retention when they viewed pictures on paper. Conclusion: The introduction of Android tablets in the classroom did not have a significant negative impact on sixth-graders’ reading comprehension. However, some caution is required when introducing tablets to first-graders and fourth-graders because of the negative effect found in this study. It should also be noted that the use of tablets may enhance the confidence of grade 4 boys during comprehension tasks, but the confidence of grade 4 girls engaged in the same activities may be deteriorated.
Article
Electronic books (e-books) are gaining popularity for personal reading. Options for access to a large selection of book titles and “anytime/anywhere” reading choices have added to the increased use of e-books. For this study, 22 third-grade students completed satisfaction surveys and reading comprehension tests on three separate reading sessions: one traditional print-based and two e-book titles. Indicators of reading engagement included motivation for independent reading and comprehension as measured by standardized tests on the print book and both e-books. Results showed that format was not as important as students’ identification with setting, characters, and theme of the book. Students did, however, indicate a preference for e-books when given the option of a wide selection of titles and the freedom to choose their own e-book. Students further indicated a preference for the amenities associated with e-book reading such as pop-up definitions and pronunciations of words, automatic page turning, and the option of read-aloud narration. The authors concluded that children quickly become comfortable with e-books and welcomed the technology. However, they are not completely ready to disregard print books.
Article
Examines the benefits of the Accelerated Reader program on English-as-a-second-language fourth and fifth grade students in a school in rural West North Carolina. Notes that anecdotal records provided evidence of improvement in students' reading behaviors and attitudes toward reading. Shows that while there was only a moderate overall increase in students' reading level, quantity of students' reading increased and attitudes toward reading improved. (SG)
Article
This research investigated the effects of an educational electronic book (e‐book) on low socioeconomic status (SES) kindergarteners' emergent literacy while focusing on the relationship between process and outcomes during joint learning. The sample (96 kindergarteners, aged five to six) was randomly assigned to experimental (e‐book activation) and control groups (regular kindergarten program). The experimental group's second joint learning session was recorded. Emergent literacy measures included word meaning, phonological awareness, and story comprehension. The main findings indicate an association between the process of e‐book use (hotspot activation and collaboration) and educational outcomes (emergent literacy). Implications for educators and e‐book designers are noted.Processus et Résultats d'une activité associée aux livres en ligne pour promouvoir les débuts de l'alphabétisation chez les enfants de la maternelleLa recherche a porté sur les effets d'un livre éducatif électronique (e‐book) sur les débuts de l'alphabétisation d'enfants de la maternelle (niveau SES bas) tout en mettant l'accent sur la relation entre le processus et le résultat pendant l'apprentissage associé. L'échantillonnage (96 élèves de maternelle âgés de 5 ou 6 ans) a été réparti au hasard entre les groupes expérimentaux (avec activation par le livre électronique) et les groupes de contrôle (programme de maternelle habituel). On a enregistré la deuxième session d'apprentissage associé du groupe expérimental. Les mesures marquant l'émergence de l'alphabétisation comprenaient la signification des mots, la sensibilité phonologique et la compréhension des histoires. Les résultats principaux font apparaître une association entre le processus d'usage du livre électronique (activation des points chauds et collaboration) et les résultats éducatifs (l'émergence de l'alphabétisation). On a également noté des conséquences possibles pour les éducateurs et pour les concepteurs de livres électroniques.Methoden und Ergebnisse des gemeinsamen Einsatzes von E‐Büchern für die Förderung von “Kindergarteners Emergent Literacy”Diese Forschung untersuchte die Auswirkungen eines erzieherischen elektronischen Buches auf niedrige SES Vorschul‐Lese und Rechtschreibfähigkeit durch Konzentration auf den Zusammenhang zwischen Prozess und Ergebnis während gemeinsamen Lernens. Die Gruppe bestand aus 96 Vorschulkindern im Alter von 5 bis 6 Jahren, die zufällig dazu ausgewählt waren, an der Experiment –bzw. Kontrollgruppe (reguläres Vorschulprogramm) teilzunehmen. Die zweite Sitzung der Experimentalgruppe wurde aufgezeichnet und umfasste Wortbedeutung, phonologisches Bewusstsein und Textverständnis. Als Hauptergebnis kann ein Zusammenhang zwischen dem Prozess der E‐Book‐Nutzung (Hotspot‐Aktivierung und Zusammenarbeit) und dem Lernerfolg (emergent literacy) für Pädagogen und E‐Buch Designer festgestellt werden.Procesos y resultados de una actividad associada con los libros en línea para fomentar el alfabetismo emergente entre los alumnos de pre‐primariaEsta investigación trata de los efectos de un libro educativo electrónico (e‐book) sobre el alfabetismo emergente de alumnos de “kinder” (SES bajo) con un enfoque sobre la relación entre el proceso y los resultados durante el aprentizaje asociado. La muestra (96 alumnos de “kinder” de 5 y 6 años) fue divida de manera aleatoria entre los grupos experimentales (con activación por el libro electrónico) y los grupos de control (programa normal del “kinder “). Se hizo una grabación de la segunda sesión de aprendizaje asociado del grupo experimental. Las medidas de alfabetismo emergente eran el sentido de las palabras, la conciencia fonológica y la comprensión de las historias. Los resultados más destacados indican una asociación entre el proceso de uso del e‐book (activación de los hotspots y colaboración) y los resultados educativos (alfabetismo emergente). Se nota también algunas implicaciones para los educadores y los diseñadores de libros electrónicos.
Article
The engagement model of reading development suggests that instruction improves students' reading comprehension to the extent that it increases students' engagement processes in reading. We compared how Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI) (support for cognitive and motivational processes in reading), strategy instruction (support for cognitive strategies in reading), and traditional instruction in fourth-grade classrooms differentially influenced students' reading comprehension, strategy use, and engagement in reading. Students experiencing CORI were significantly higher than both comparison groups on reading comprehension, reading strategies, and reading engagement. When students' level of reading engagement was statistically controlled, the differences between the treatment groups were not significant. We infer that the level of students' reading engagement during classroom work mediated the instructional effects on reading outcomes. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Article
This study investigates the differences in children’s comprehension and enjoyment of storybooks according to the medium of presentation. Two different storybooks were used and 132 children participated. Of these, 51 children read an extract from The Magicians of Caprona, about half reading an electronic version with an online dictionary, and the rest reading a printed version with a separate printed dictionary. The remaining 81 children read an extract from The Little Prince, 26 reading an electronic version, 26 reading the same but with narration and 29 reading a printed version. No dictionary was supplied with this storybook. The type of medium did not significantly affect the children’s enjoyment of either storybook, and while it took them longer to read the electronic versions, this difference was only significant for The Little Prince. For both storybooks, comprehension scores were higher for retrieval-type questions than for inference ones. The use of the online dictionary in the electronic condition of The Magicians of Caprona was significantly greater than that for the printed dictionary in that condition. The provision of narration in the electronic version of The Little Prince led to significantly higher comprehension scores than when narration was absent.
Article
The effects of an educational electronic book (e-book) on 149 five- to six-year-old kindergarteners’ emergent literacy levels were researched in two SES groups: low (LSES) (79 children) vs. middle (MSES) (70 children). In each SES group, children were randomly assigned to four groups. Three groups were assigned to work individually in one of three e-book activity modes: “Read story only”, “Read with dictionary”, or “Read and play” during three similar activity sessions and the fourth group served as a control which received the regular program of the kindergarten. Pre- and post-intervention emergent literacy measures included word meaning, word recognition, and phonological awareness. Results show that word meaning of children from both middle and low SES improved following the educational e-book activity, regardless of mode. Second, LSES children’s emergent literacy levels showed relatively greater improvement rates than did those of the MSES children. Third, children in the “Read with dictionary” and “Read and play” activity modes showed more improvement in their emergent literacy levels than did those in the “Read story only” mode. Implications for future research and for education are discussed.
Article
Includes bibliographical references (p. 29-32) Research reported herein was supported in part by the National Institute of Education and in part by Harvard University. US-NIE-C-400-76-0116 L92121