The Lure of the Other: Sheridan, Identity and Performance in Kingston and Calcutta

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.


How did the American War affect ideas of nationality, identity, and belonging for the widely dispersed and varied British subjects? This article addresses this question through an examination of the performances of Richard Brinsley Sheridan's comic opera The Duenna (1775) in Kingston, Jamaica, and his comedy The School for Scandal (1777) in Calcutta, Bengal. In each of these sites, theatrical performances enabled residents to embrace both the love of alterity and the longing for home that were each endemic to colonial life. Yet the comic figures of Jewish characters in each play suggested that Britishness and otherness were not far removed from each other, as theatrical performance, almost despite itself, began to sketch in more similarities than differences dividing us from them. In a moment when metropolitan anxieties about empire and colonial engagements with otherness had become entangled with practices and peoples that seemed to put British identity at risk, Sheridan's two comedies hint that empire could make everyone an "other," a "them." Sheridan then attempted to diffuse that insight in his plays, inviting the audience to laugh at itself as it engaged in the pleasures, and pains, of real and imagined identifications.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... The vast majority of plays during the period premiered in London; but they had rich lives as they circulated outside of the London theaters. In tracing performances of R. B. Sheridan's WESSEL -5 of 13 plays in Jamaica and India, for instance, Kathleen Wilson (2015) argues that "performance and the 'repertoire' each powerfully enact embodied memories that are carried with bodies, in all their orality, gesture, and movement -in ways that allow us to glimpse the changing 'choreographies of meaning' attached to plays as they moved across foreign, provincial or otherwise peripheral space" (p. 511). ...
Full-text available
Over the last few decades, theater history has moved beyond a documentary and descriptive approach to become a field that increasingly embraces the “epistemological uncertainty” that comes with studying an unfixed medium. This shift owes much to the flourishing of performance studies in the 1990s and 2000s. This essay examines the effects of performance studies on 18th‐century theater history. Theater historians of earlier periods have long grappled with how to study a medium that is uncapturable by print alone. Performance's ephemerality and its embodiment, in particular, pose challenges to those working in the archives. This essay reviews the recent scholarship that brings together the archival work of theater history with newer performance‐oriented methodologies. The turn to performance studies allows us to better theorize the experiences and identities that archives have sometimes obscured, especially involving women and minorities. Moreover, taking the medium of performance seriously not just as an object of study, but as a mode of constructing and disseminating theater history enables us to experience vicariously sensory elements of performance that traditional print scholarship cannot fully capture.
This article examines the meanings and controversies surrounding sales by public auction in British colonial Calcutta and in London during the last decades of the eighteenth century. For Britons living in Calcutta's European sector, auctions were essential for acquiring imported European items that granted a sense of gentility and Britishness abroad. Public sales in Calcutta provided Britons with goods that instilled the fantasy of living in a British geography in India. However, by the last quarter of the century, ‘sales by hammer’ throughout the colonial world carried association with corruption, cruelty, and orientalization in the metropolitan imagination. In Britain, textual and visual accounts circulated of Europeans transforming into debauched ‘nabobs’, of the horrors of American slave auctions, and of the British East India Company's use of public sales to defraud and abuse prominent Indians. For some metropolitan observers, sales by hammer were a deceitful means of seizing property and status from the traditional landed elite of India and Britain. British critics feared that colonial auction practices could become common in Britain and could lead to the upending of social hierarchization and the normalization of slavery in the metropolis.
This book reveals the importance of the theatre in the shaping of response to the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars (1793-1815). The author explores the roles of the military and navy as both actors and audiences, and shows their performances to be crucial to their self-perception as actors fighting on behalf of an often distant domestic audience. The Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars of 1793-1815 had profound consequences for British society, politics, and culture. In this study of the cultural dimension of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, the author examines an important dimension of the experience of them: theatricality. Through this study, the theatre emerges as a place where battles were celebrated in the form of spectacular re-enactments, and where the tensions of mobilization on a hitherto unprecedented scale were played out in the form of riots and disturbances. Members of the military and the navy were actively engaged in such shows, taking to the stage as actors in the theatres of Britain, in ships off Portsmouth, and in the garrisons and battlefields of continental Europe and the empire.
This essay examines three published but unperformed political parodies of the 1770s: The Duenna (1776) and The Critic; or a Tragedy Rehearsed (1780), both attributed to Israel Pottinger, and The School for Scandal (1779) by the Philadelphian John Leacock. These works, taking their titles from the comedies of Richard Brinsley Sheridan, are to all intents and purposes anti-government pamphlets in dramatic form, specific critiques of the British administration's handling of the American War. This piece explores the processes by which Pottinger and Leacock politicize Sheridanian comedy of manners in order to dramatize and interrogate the new cultural technologies, most especially the mass media, engendered or accelerated by the American war.