Content uploaded by Arman Hashemi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Arman Hashemi on Sep 01, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Embodied Energy of Fired Bricks:
The Case of Uganda and Tanzania
Arman Hashemi1, Heather Cruickshank2
1 Centre for Sustainable Development, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK.
a.hashemi@eng.cam.ac.uk
2 Centre for Sustainable Development, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK.
hjc34@cam.ac.uk
Abstract: This paper evaluates the embodied energy of fired/burned bricks as one of the major construction
materials in East African countries. Production processes of bricks by artisans, and small- and medium-scale
manufacturers are explained. Embodied energy of brick walls is also calculated and the key factors in the energy
efficiency of brick kilns are discussed in detail. Low quality, high material waste and excessive energy waste
during production and handling are highlighted as the major issues associate with traditional manufacturing
processes of burned bricks in Uganda and Tanzania. The results reveal that small clamp kilns lose up to 3.5
times more energy through their cooling surfaces compared to large kilns. The results also indicate that clamp
fired bricks are up to 60% more energy intensive than generic bricks and the embodied energy of artisan brick
walls is 35% more than standard brick walls with comparable thicknesses. Improving kiln construction and
production methods, educating artisan producers, replanting tress, providing alternative renewable energy
sources, and design improvements to control fire intensity and air circulation in brick kilns are some of the
recommendations to improve the energy efficiency and mitigate the environmental impacts of fired bricks in East
African countries.
Keywords: Embodied Energy, Life Cycle Assessment, Fired Brick, Burned Brick, East Africa, Uganda, Tanzania.
14th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies – SET 2015
25th - 27th of August 2015, Nottingham, UK
HASHEMI, CRUICKSHANK _PAPER 99 2
1. INTRODUCTION
Traditional construction methods and materials have historically been a sustainable response to housing
demands in developing countries. The production methods of locally manufactured materials in Uganda and
Tanzania have more or less remained unchanged during the last few decades. Brick walling is a major
construction method in both rural and urban areas of East African countries including Uganda (UBOS, 2010).
Fired/burned brick, however has negatively affected the local environment contributing to issues such as
deforestation, desertification, air pollution, excessive soil extraction and fuel crisis (Perez, 2009; CRAterre, 2005;
World Bank, 1989). This is mainly due to the excessive energy and material waste and inefficient production
processes of burned bricks which are mainly delivered by artisan producers (World Bank, 1989). Increased use of
energy intensive materials such as concrete and burned bricks has raised concerns over the long-term
environmental impacts of such trends in East Africa. The forestry cover in Uganda, for example, has reduced by
25% from 45% coverage in 1990 to around 20% in 2005. This means an annual deforestation rate of 1.7% which
is increasing year by year. Considering the current situation, Uganda’s forests could be vanished during the next
few decades (ILO, 2010).
Environmental impacts of buildings and products are evaluated using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method
(Figure 1). The total carbon footprint of buildings consists of the embodied carbon of building products plus the
operational carbon which is the energy consumption during building lifetime. The majority of the embodied carbon
of building products is linked to CO2 emissions from fossil fuels during extraction and manufacturing processes of
construction materials (Anderson & Thornback, 2012). The embodied carbon of building fabrics is becoming more
important due to increasing energy efficiency requirements which reduce the operational carbon of buildings
during their lifetime.
Figure 1: Building Life Cycle
Yet, considering the negligible operational energy for space heating and cooling in East African low-income
housing, the embodied energy of construction materials is the main factor in evaluating the environmental impacts
of the low-income housing sector. The embodied energy of construction materials such as burned brick in
contrast is a major concern. Improving energy efficiency and reducing material wastes during production
processes could therefore reduce the overall greenhouse gas emission rates and mitigate the environmental
impacts of the construction industry. To this end, this study intends to evaluate the production processes of
fired/burned bricks produced by artisan, small- and medium-scale manufacturers in order to identify the key areas
for improvement.
2. METHODOLOGY
Literature review, and primary data gathered from site visits and photographic surveys in two East African
countries (Uganda and Tanzania) are the main methods of data collection for this paper. Available literature is
reviewed to assess the actual fuelwood consumption and brick sizes as well as production rates by artisans and
small- and medium-scale manufacturers in Uganda. Energy consumption and potential saving rates during
production processes are then calculated using the outcomes of the literature review. The embodied energy rates
of burned bricks and brick walling are also calculated and compared with other generic bricks/ brick walls using
the available data in the "Embodied Carbon: The Inventory of Carbon and Energy" developed by the University of
Bath (Hammond & Jones, 2011).
14th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies – SET 2015
25th - 27th of August 2015, Nottingham, UK
HASHEMI, CRUICKSHANK _PAPER 99 3
3. WALLING METHODS AND MATERIALS
Figure 2 shows the main walling methods and materials during 2009/2010 in Uganda. Brick walling (either adobe
or fired) is the most common construction method in Uganda. More than 80% of houses in urban areas have brick
walls compared to around 50% in rural areas. Mud and poles walling is also very common particularly in rural
areas where more than 40% of homes are built with mud and poles. Overall, around 84% of all houses in Uganda
have brick walls compared to around 12% which are built with mud and poles (UBOS, 2010).
Figure 2: Main walling types during 2009-2010 (%).
Source of table: (UBOS, 2010)
Although burned brick is considered as a durable material, its high embodied energy makes it an environmentally
harmful material compared to other prevailing construction materials in East African countries. The very inefficient
production methods of kiln fired bricks, which mainly use local wood as their fuel, contribute to issues such as
deforestation and air pollution (Perez, 2009; CRAterre, 2005; World Bank, 1989). In fact wood is the main source
of energy particularly in rural Uganda. Two major reasons of deforestation in Uganda are cutting trees for
firewood, and charcoal, and for creating agricultural land (ILO, 2010). Fuelwood (firewood and charcoal) and
agricultural waste account for 93% of energy consumption in Uganda (The Government of the Republic of
Uganda, 2001). Around 95% of supplied wood in Uganda is used for energy generation (The Government of the
Republic of Uganda, 2001) including in the brick manufacturing industry (Figure 3). Around 91% of the required
energy for brick production is from firewood and the rest is from agricultural waste (World Bank, 1989).
Figure 3: Inefficient production processes and use of fuelwood contribute to deforestation, air pollution and fuel crisis (Uganda).
Source: The authors
4. PRODUCTION PROCESSES OF BRICK
Low quality, energy intensive traditional methods of brick production by artisans is a major concern which has
negatively affected the local environment in both Uganda and Tanzania. In the traditional production method
(Figure 3), unfired moulded bricks are prepared using local clay and water and are then left to dry out before
being fired in field kilns for 4-6 days using gradually intensified wood fire (Nyakairu et al., 2002; Batchelder et al.,
14th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies – SET 2015
25th - 27th of August 2015, Nottingham, UK
HASHEMI, CRUICKSHANK _PAPER 99 4
1985; Practical Action). Energy and material wastes are the two major issues associated with traditional
production methods of fired brick. One of the major issues is the lack of control over burning and fuel consumption
(Batchelder et al., 1985). Considerable energy is also wasted through hot exhaust gases during production
processes (World Bank, 1989).
Larger rectangular kilns and clamps can achieve better fuel efficiency thanks to lower heat losses due to the lower
volume to surface ratio. Cubic kilns are assumed to have four cooling faces (on the sides) and the heat losses
through the top and ground facing surfaces are considered separately (Practical Action). Table 1 shows the
common brick and kiln sizes in Uganda along with the cooling ratios and average wastes of different kilns. The
results of calculations reveal that a 1.5x2x2m brick kiln loses 3.5 times more energy through cooling surfaces
compared with a 6x6x4.3m kiln due to much higher cooling area/volume ratio. There is also a direct relationship
between the kiln sizes and the portion of under fired/ low quality bricks. According to World Bank (1989), around
46% of clamp fired bricks in a 3x3x3.1m kiln have low quality compared to 24% for a 6x6x4.3m clamp kiln. This is
while, according to Batchelder et al. (1985), smaller kilns provide a more uniform distribution of fire improving the
quality of final products. The latter requires more investigation to evaluate the relationships between kiln sizes and
overall waste and quality of bricks.
The average size of field kilns in Uganda is 2.4-3 metres (Batchelder et al., 1985). Despite higher fuel efficiency of
larger kilns, the width/length of country kilns should not be more than 4.5-6 metres mainly due to increases in total
fuel consumption, labour and costs. The overall process of production from clay moulding to finished product
takes around three weeks for 4,000 to 10,000 bricks. It takes an average of 5 weeks for 5 people to excavate,
mould and fire up to 9,000 bricks (Emerton et al., 1998). Around 60-75 metres of 4" to 8" dry wood (in addition to
woodchip and coffee/rice husks) is required to produce 20,000 bricks (Batchelder et al., 1985) and nearly 80% of
the required timber for fuel is provided from locally grown trees (Naughton-Treves et al., 2007).
Table 1: Brick kiln sizes and cooling ratios
Clamp
Kiln Size
(W x L x H)
(m)*
Brick/Block
Size (mm)*
Total
Surface
Area
(m2)
Cooling
Surface
Area
(m2)
Volume
(m3)
No. of
bricks
Mass
of
Bricks
(tonne)
Ratio:
Cooling
Area/Volume
Relative
Cooling
Area/Volume
energy
waste
Low
quality/
under
fired
portion*
1.5x2x2
228x111x76
20
14
6
~2100
~6.6
2.33
348%
-
3x3x3.1
290x140x90
55.2
37.2
27.9
5300
31
1.33
199%
46%
4.5x4.5x4.3
290x140x90
117.9
77.4
87.1
16860
98.6
0.89
133%
31%
6x6x4.3
290x140x90
175.2
103.2
154.8
30840
180.4
0.67
100%
24%
* Source of information: (Batchelder et al., 1985; World Bank, 1989)
Firing the bricks creates a ceramic bond in a specific temperature (900-1200° C) which increases the strength of
the brick making it water resistant. Using the right amount of fuel is very important not only for fuel and cost
efficiency but also to provide the right temperature for bonding. Low temperature results in poor quality/bonding
while high temperature would either slump or melt the bricks. Controlling cold air flow thought the brick kiln is also
a key factor to make the kiln more energy efficient. Too much air circulation will cool down the bricks and wastes
the energy while too little air flow will stop the fuel from burning properly. Providing dampers and wind breaks to
control/protect the fire could greatly improve the fuel efficiency of kilns (Practical Action).
5. BRICK SUPPLIERS
Artisans, small- and medium-scale manufactures are the three major types of suppliers of bricks in Uganda (Table
2). Bricks produced by artisans take a larger share of the market compared to small- and medium-scale
manufactured bricks. The handmade bricks and blocks produced by artisans are suitable for single storey
buildings. The length of the bricks/blocks may vary between 220-295mm; the width between 100-150mm; and the
thickness between 60-130mm. The weight may also vary between 2.5 and 7.6 kg per brick/block. The final
sizes/dimensions of produced bricks and blocks in a lot may also vary greatly (World Bank, 1989). This, in fact
has been regarded as the major reason for extensive use of mortar (up to 30mm) in the construction of brick walls
(Perez, 2009).
Table 2: Brick production scales (World Bank, 1989)
Production scale
No. of bricks (per day)
Production process
Area
Artisans
1,000
Handmade, clamp fired
Rural areas
Small-scale
10,000
Semi-mechanised
Towns
Medium-scale
40,000
Mechanised
Industrialised areas with
high demand
14th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies – SET 2015
25th - 27th of August 2015, Nottingham, UK
HASHEMI, CRUICKSHANK _PAPER 99 5
Firewood is mainly used by artisans for brick production. The firing period and temperature are kept low to save
as much wood as possible. This results in a rather poor quality bricks and blocks with compressive strengths of
usually lower than 8 N/mm2. Moreover the bricks which are within 300 mm from the external surfaces of the field
kilns have a very low quality and are not completely waterproof (Figure 4). The portion of the low quality bricks
produced using traditional methods varies between 25% and 45% of the entire production (World Bank, 1989).
Figure 4: Bricks within 300mm of the clamp kiln’s surfaces have a very low quality (Tanzania).
Source: The authors
Moreover, around 10-17% of materials is wasted during transportation, handling and construction processes on
site (Anderson & Thornback, 2012; World Bank, 1989) which has considerable impacts on the construction sites
(Figure 5). Material waste is in fact one of the major concerns which has negatively affected the overall
performance of the Ugandan construction industry. Improving the brick quality could, to some extent, address the
abovementioned issues.
Figure 5: High material waste during production and handeling (Tanzania).
Source: The authors
6. EMBODIED ENERGY OF FIRED BRICKS
Firewood along with coffee/rice husks are the main fuels used to produce burned bricks in Uganda and Tanzania.
The effective calorific value of wood is highly dependent on the water content of the wood and therefore
seasonality factors are significant. On average, 0.5 m3 of wood is required to produce a tonne of clamp fired brick
(World Bank, 1989). Assuming a density of 0.56 g/cm3 (Kumar et al., 2011) and a lower heating value of around
17 MJ/kg (Musinguzi et al., 2012) for Eucalyptus wood, as the major fuel for artisan brick production (World Bank,
1989), an average of 4760 MJ is required to produce one tonne of burned brick. According to the Inventory of
Carbon and Energy ICEV2.0, the embodied energy value for “General simple backed clay products” and “General
Clay Bricks” is 3.0 MJ/Kg (Hammond & Jones, 2011). This means that the energy consumptions by artisans is 1.6
times more than the required energy for the production of generic fired bricks. Table 3 summarises the fuel
consumption and embodied energy of artisan bricks.
14th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies – SET 2015
25th - 27th of August 2015, Nottingham, UK
HASHEMI, CRUICKSHANK _PAPER 99 6
Table 3: Embodied energy of burned bricks
Product
Required equivalent
fuelwood per tonne of
product (m3)
Energy consumption per
tonne of product (MJ)
Energy consumption
compared to “General Clay
Bricks”
General Clay Bricks
Est. 0.315
3000
100%
Artisan/ Clamp Fired Bricks
0.5
4760
159%
The embodied energy values of artisan clamp fired brick walling and general clay brick walling are also calculated
in Table 4. According to the information provided by the World Bank (1989), artisan-produced brick and block
dimensions could vary greatly from 220 to 295 mm (length), 110 to 150 mm (width), and 65 to 130 mm (height).
An average of 20mm, 1:4 cement mortar with an embodied energy of 1.1 MJ/Kg (Hammond & Jones, 2011) are
assumed to calculate the embodied energy of artisan brick walling. It should be noted that mortar thicknesses of
up to 30mm (Figure 5) is normally considered to compensate for uneven sizes of bricks in Uganda (Perez, 2009).
According to the results, the embodied energy of 300 mm and 220 mm artisan brick walls are 1619 and 1067
MJ/m2, respectively. Assuming the same brick density and mortar thickness of 10 mm for a “General Clay Bricks”
with a dimension of 215x102.5x65 mm (UK standard brick dimensions), the embodied energy of a 215 mm solid
brick wall would be 791 MJ/m2 which is around 26% lower than the embodied of energy of a 220 mm artisan brick
wall. The per square metre embodied energy of the 300 mm artisan brick wall is around 100% and 50% higher
than the embodied energy of 215 mm General Clay Brick and 220 mm artisan brick walls, respectively.
The results also indicate that walls built with smaller bricks (e.g. 220x110x65 mm) have a lower embodied energy
compared to walls constructed with larger bricks (e.g. 300x150x130 mm). This is mainly due to the considerably
lower embodied energy of cement mortar compared to fired bricks. In other words, increased mortar to brick ratio
for smaller bricks reduces the total embodied energy per square metre of walls due to the much higher embodied
energy of fired bricks compared to mortar.
Figure 5: Mortar thicknesses of up to 30mm is normal for brick walling (Uganda)
Source: The authors
Table 4: Embodied energy of brick walls
Product
Brick size,
(mm)
Wall
thickness
(mm)
Embodied
energy of
material
(MJ/Kg)
Mass per
item/littre
(Kg)
Embodied
energy of
wall per m2
Embodied
energy of
(MJ/m3)
Relative
embodied
energy of
walls per
m2
Artisan
Clamp Fired
Brick/Block
300x150x130
300
4.76
7.6
1619
5398
205%
20mm Mortar
1.11
1.65
220x110x65
220
4.76
2
1067
4849
135%
20mm Mortar
1.11
1.65
General Clay
Brick
215x102.5x65
215
3
2
791
3677
100%
10mm Mortar
1.11
1.65
14th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies – SET 2015
25th - 27th of August 2015, Nottingham, UK
HASHEMI, CRUICKSHANK _PAPER 99 7
7. CONCLUSIONS
This paper discussed the production processes of fired bricks produced by artisans and small- and medium-scale
manufactures in Uganda and Tanzania. Low quality of bricks, high material wastes and excessive energy
consumption were identified as the major issues associated with traditional manufacturing processes of burned
bricks. The results indicate that the embodied energy of artisan clamp fired brick walling per square metre of the
wall is 35% more than generic brick walls with comparable thicknesses. The embodied energy of artisan bricks is
also around 60% more than the embodied energy of generic bricks. Yet, considering the high wastes and low
quality (and therefore lower durability and shorter lifespan of clamp fired bricks) it could be argued that the overall
environmental impacts of artisan bricks is much higher than generic bricks.
The results of this paper also reveal that small kilns can lose between 1.33 and 3.48 times more energy through
their cooling surfaces compared with large clamp kilns. Up to 46% of the entire production of small kilns is also
under fired, low quality bricks which increases the wastes and breakage rate during handling, transportation and
construction on site. It should be noted that burned bricks are one of the major consumers of firewood in East
African countries contributing to issues such as deforestation, air pollution, excessive soil extraction and other
negative environmental impacts. Improving brick quality and reducing material wastes help to mitigate the
negative environmental impacts of fired bricks. Improving the production methods and energy efficiency of brick
kilns could also reduce the embodied energy of burned bricks. In this respect, following are recommended to
mitigate the environmental impacts of bricks:
a) Encourage the use of unfired bricks/ adobe instead of burned bricks;
b) Encourage replanting trees used for fuel;
c) Provide alternative renewable energy sources as a replacement of fuelwood;
d) Educate artisans to use larger rectangular clamp kilns which are more energy efficient;
e) Provide means to control fire intensity and improve air circulation in kilns to reduce energy consumption
and achieve higher quality bricks;
f) Improve the design of kilns and develop affordable heat recovery systems for field kilns to reduce heat
losses through radiation and hot exhaust gases.
8. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work is funded through an EPSRC research programme, Energy and Low Income Tropical Housing, Grant
number: EP/L002604/1.
14th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies – SET 2015
25th - 27th of August 2015, Nottingham, UK
HASHEMI, CRUICKSHANK _PAPER 99 8
9. REFERENCES
Anderson, J., Thornback, J., 2012. A guide to understanding the embodied impacts of construction products,
Construction Products Association, London.
Batchelder, D., Caiola, R., Davenport, S., 1985. Construction Reference Manual, A source book For the Use of
Local materials In Construction, The Experiment in International Living, Brattleboro, USA.
CRAterre, 2005. Earth Architecture in Uganda, Pilot project in Bushennyi 2002-2004; CRATerre Editions.
Emerton, L., Iyango, L., Luwum, P., Malinga, A., 1998. The Present Economic Value of Nakivubo Urban Wetland,
Uganda. IUCN — The World Conservation Union, Eastern Africa Regional Office, Nairobi, Kenya and National
Wetlands Programme, Wetlands Inspectorate Division, Ministry of Water, Land and Environment, Kampala,
Uganda.
Hammond G., Jones C., 2011. Embodied Carbon: The Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE). BSRIA, Bracknell,
UK.
ILO, 2010. Skills for green jobs in Uganda: unedited background country study, International Labour Office, Skills
and Employability Department, Geneva.
Kumar, R., Pandey, K.K., Chandrashekar, N., Mohan, S., 2011. Study of age and height wise variability on
calorific value and other fuel properties of Eucalyptus hybrid, Acacia auriculaeformis and Casuarina equisetifolia,
Biomass and Bioenergy, 35 (3): 1339–1344. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.031
Musinguzi, W. B., Okure, M. A.E., Wang, L., Sebbit, A., Løvås, T., 2012. Thermal characterization of Uganda's
Acacia hockii, Combretum molle, Eucalyptus grandis and Terminalia glaucescens for gasification, Biomass and
Bioenergy, 46: 402–408. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.08.001
Naughton-Treves, L., Kammen, D. M., Chapman, C., 2007. Burning biodiversity: Woody biomass use by
commercial and subsistence groups in western Uganda’s forests, Biological Conservation, 134: 232-241.
doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.020
Nyakairu, G. W.A., Kurzweil, H., Koeberl,C., 2002. Mineralogical, geochemical, and sedimentlogical
characteristics of clay deposits from central Uganda and their applications, Journal of African Earth Sciences
35:123–134.
Perez, A., 2009. Interlocking Stabilised Soil Blocks, Appropriate earth technologies in Uganda; HS/1184/09E,
United Nations Human Settlements Programme: Nairobi, Kenya.
Practical Action, Ten rules for energy efficient, cost effective brick firing, a guide for brickmakers and field-
workers, Practical Action, The Schumacher Centre, Rugby, UK. http://cdn1.practicalaction.org/t/e/541ae1a5-d2f4-
4255-928e-54760a000047.pdf (Accessed 20/05/2015)
The Government of the Republic of Uganda, 2001, National Biomass Energy Demand Strategy 2001-2010, The
Government of the Republic of Uganda, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, Kampala, Uganda.
UBOS, 2010. Uganda National Household Survey 2009/10; Uganda Bureau of Statistics: Kampala, Uganda.
World Bank, 1989. Uganda - Energy efficiency improvement in the brick and tile industry. Activity completion
report; no. ESM 97 89. Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme. Washington, DC: World Bank.