Content uploaded by Stella Tomasi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Stella Tomasi on Sep 15, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 27
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
ABSTRACT
Search engines have become an important channel for increasing SMEs’ global reach as well as competing with
larger companies. Therefore, SMEs are enhancing their business visibility through search engine optimization
(SEO). With effective SEO techniques, small companies can appear ahead of large, well-known companies
on search results. However, in addition increasing the ranking on a search engine results page (SERP), there
may be other benets that SMEs may enjoy while engaging in an SEO campaign. This study uses multiple
rms as cases to illustrate how SEO initiatives can impact performance for SMEs. The authors found that
in addition to increasing the rankings on SERPs, SMEs saw an increase in number of visitors to the site, the
average time duration of users visiting the site, more user engagement and an increase of annual sales revenue.
Inuences of Search
Engine Optimization on
Performance of SMEs:
A Qualitative Perceptive
Stella Tomasi, Department of e-Business and Technology Management, Towson University,
Towson, MD, USA
Xiaolin Li, Department of e-Business and Technology Management, Towson University,
Towson, MD, USA
Keywords: Brand Management, Case Studies, Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Small Medium
Enterprises (SMEs), Websites
1. INTRODUCTION
A small and medium-sized enterprise (SME),
which refers to a business with fewer than 500
employees, independently owned and operated,
and not dominant in its field of operation, plays
a significant role in the growth and change of
economies (Trumbach et al., 2006; Ramdani
et al., 2009; Obafemi, 2009) in international
markets. Although many believe that firm size
is a key dimension in labeling SMEs, Pett and
Wolff (2012) state that this is not an ideal mea-
sure and is viewed as benign by SME managers
and owners. Nevertheless, we follow Wolff and
Pett (2000) by defining SME by identifying
three categories of firm size: micro-firms (un-
der 25 employees), small-sized firms (26-100
employees) and medium sized firms (101-500
employees). Factors that distinguish SMEs from
larger firms is the available resources within
DOI: 10.4018/jeco.2015010103
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
28 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
the firm, the level of innovativeness and ability
to take risks (Westerberg and Wincent, 2008).
Furthermore, SMEs contribute to job creation
(Clark III and Moutray 2004) and can be the
basis to become future large companies (Monk
2000). Therefore, studying SMEs can enhance
our understanding of their growth and develop-
ment (Abouzeedan, 2011) and due to their sig-
nificance to local economies, it is also necessary
to study and evaluate their performance (Acs
1999). Saeed et al. (2005) found insights into
the drivers of performance for e-commerce or-
ganizations. Since organizations find it difficult
to build and sustain a competitive advantage
on the Internet, they were able to identify that
companies with high ecommerce competence
had higher levels of firm performance, which
was mediated by Web site functionality. This
is an important finding, since performance is
related to partially to how well the customer is
able to find information on the Website.
As Internet technologies have been chang-
ing the way business is conducted, SMEs are
investing in such technologies and taking ad-
vantage of e-commerce to access global markets
and to compete with larger companies in their
industries. e-Commerce sales grew from 72 bil-
lion US dollars in 2002 to 228 billion US dollars
in 2010 (www.statista.com). For SMEs, creating
a website that allows online transactions is the
easy part. The more daunting task lies in making
the website visible to potential customers when
they search for product information. Search
engines have become an important channel
for increasing SMEs’ global reach as well as
competing with larger companies.
Search engines are likely to have a signifi-
cant impact on business performances. They are
not only convenient information tools but also
powerful agents of a transformation that makes
the business environment more transparent and
more competitive (Rangaswamy et al., 2009).
The display of search results into meaningful
groups and sequence of items are important
characteristics on how information is viewed
(Kleinmuntz & Schkade, 1993). Furthermore,
the sequence of results significantly influences
the way users process the information on the
page (Hogarth & Einhorn, 1992).
Internet users expect the most relevant
results to be listed at the top of a SERP and
may have expectations that the ranking of
search results are relevant to their search terms
(Rowley 2004). Research shows that the higher
the website ranks on a SERP (search engine
results page), the greater the likelihood that
the website will be visited by a user (Enge et
al., 2012). Users also believe that companies
whose websites appear at the top of SERPs
are the top companies in that field of search
(iProspect, 2006). This kind of ranking schema
has also been verified in a study (Enquiro, 2007),
which investigated how car buyers perceived
the best fuel efficient car on a SERP. When
the brand name car, Honda, was placed in the
first position on the SERP, users perceived it
as more fuel efficient; however, when Honda
was not placed in the first page, users did not
perceive it to be important. Research has also
shown that users do not look past the first two
or three pages of the result set (Roussinov &
Chen, 2001). Therefore, the need to increase the
ranking of a website which is possible through
search engine optimization (SEO) has become
an increasingly important for many organiza-
tions, specifically for SMEs who could be left
behind in the global marketplace if they do not
engage in this marketing channel.
SEO is the process of improving the vis-
ibility of a website through organic searches on
a search engine results page through different
ranking algorithms. Industry observers argue
that companies should pursue organic search
rankings if their goal is to obtain a long-term,
sustainable branding impact (Noaman, 2006).
Moreno and Martinez (2013) state “In addition
to mere presence on the web, it is increasingly
important for businesses that their site be ranked
more highly than those of their competitors on
SERPs (pg. 564). In their study, they found
overlaps in SEO and web accessibility. There-
fore, there are other factors that can be gained
with SEO in addition to just improving the
rankings on SERPs.
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 29
The primary benefit of SEO naturally lies
in the fact that the improvement of the website
through SEO contributes directly to new cus-
tomer acquisition. Hansell (2007) notes that
search engines are responsible for many visi-
tors to a company’s website, specifically new
customers who search for information regarding
products and services. Similarly, Purcell et al.
(2012) suggested that search engines play a
critical role in online search as more than half
of all visitors to websites tend to arrive there
from a search engine (Introna & Nissenbaum,
2000) and 91% of users report that they always
or most of the time find the information they
are seeking when they use search engines Small
companies that do not use SEO to increase their
website rankings tend to remain unnoticed and
limited in its geographical reach (Rangaswamy
et al., 2009).
Since many SMEs do not know what the
benefits of SEO are nor have the resources
within the firm to conduct SEO (Kritzinger and
Weideman, 2013), they will allocate funds to
outsource to SEO companies that will help them.
As stated earlier, it is necessary to study and
evaluate their performance of SMEs since they
are significant to local economies (Acs 1999).
However, to date, we have not found a study that
shows the impact of SEO on performance for
SMEs who have limited resources and require
the maximum amount of benefits. Based on the
recommendation of Serrano-Cinca et al. (2010)
who stated that qualitative research techniques
are needed to further advance research on the
relationship between search engine positioning
and performance, we have used a multi-case
study methodology to explore the impact of SEO
on three SMEs. SEO can level the playing field
for an SME, because well-known companies
do not necessarily reside in the top positions
on SERPs (Fusco, 2006). With effective search
engine optimization techniques, unknown small
companies can appear ahead of larger, well-
known companies. However, little research is
available to show the various tangible benefits
of SEOs for SMEs, specifically micro and small
firms. Furthermore, Moreno and Martinez
(2013) state that there are other benefits besides
higher ranking on SERPs to implementing SEO
that should be identified. Therefore we explore
additional impacts that can be gained from us-
ing SEO for SMEs, who have limited funds to
engage in marketing channels. Our study aims
to answer the following question:
In addition to increasing the ranking on SERPs,
How does the influence of SEO help SMEs
increase performance?
This study will prove to be an effective
reference for other SMEs looking to enhance
their website visibility and increase their efforts
to stay competitive.
The remainder of paper is organized as fol-
lows: In Section 2, we review related literature
in search engine optimization, its usage among
SMEs, and its potential performance impact. In
Section 3, we offer a report and analysis of three
cases of SMEs that have used SEO, which high-
light the business context and tangible impact of
SEO on the firms; In Section 4, we synthesize
the three cases into a series of important fac-
tors of SEO influence. Finally, in Section 5, we
discuss implications of the findings, limitations,
and avenues for future research.
2. LITERATURE BACKGROUND
There are certain traits that distinguish SMEs
from large corporations (Spence and Ruther-
foord, 2003). For example, SMEs are in gen-
eral actively managed by their owners, highly
personalized, local in their area of operation,
and dependent on internal sources to finance
any business growth (Vyakarnam et al., 1997).
Robinson (2014) states that smaller firms
seeking to compete with the larger firms or
even other firms will do so on the basis of suc-
cessfully leveraging technology. He continues
to state that “Failing to utilize technology as a
competitive weapon will likely not produce the
desired advantage given the changes in technol-
ogy” (pg 92). He also states that smaller firms
need to be innovative to compete with firms
that have more resources. In his study, he found
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
30 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
that innovation and competitive advantage are
significantly related. Therefore, smaller firms
who don’t have many resources available to
them need to develop capabilities or find ser-
vices that enable them to yield an advantage.
Gunasekaran et al. (2011) state that SMEs
need to be ready to accept new advance in tech-
nology and use it to their advantage to meet the
demanding and challenging market needs to stay
competitive. Search engines are an important
promotional method for e-Commerce websites
and they represent an effective way for new
e-Commerce sites to market themselves. For a
company that sells products or services on the
Internet, conversions occur when a customer
transitions from visiting a website to responding
to the website by either signing up for informa-
tion, purchasing something or some other type
of engagement activity with the company. For
small businesses, conversion rates are critical
and can be different based on the needs of the
company. The conversions may be an online
purchase, or a catalog or consultation request,
a phone call, or whatever the “call to action”
of the website is. A conversion rate or cost per
acquisition (CPA) is based on the amount of
money that a company uses to become visible
to a customer. If the customer purchases a
product due to the money spent on becoming
visible to the customer, this would be defined
as conversion to a sale.
2.1. Advertisements over Internet
Paid search has enormous economic impact
and has become a part of the primary business
model for search engine companies (Jansen,
2006). eMarketer estimated that online adver-
tisers spent more than $1.3 billion in targeted
advertising in 2011, and that amount is expected
to increase to more than $2.6 billion in 2014
(Hallerman 2010).
2.2. Pay per Click (PPC)
or Sponsored Links
Companies pay the search engine to place their
ads on the top, right or bottom of a SERP, which
are called pay per click (PPC) advertisements
or sponsored results. Companies purchase bids
on one or more keywords to ensure that their
ads will be displayed when results are displayed
(Jansen, 2006; Jansen, 2007). Once a company
bids on a keyword to appear on the sponsored
results, if a customer clicks on that website
during a search, the customer will be directed
to the company’s website and the company is
charged based on the bid by the search engine.
The charge to the company only occurs once a
customer clicks on the website in the sponsored
section. This can be very expensive for small
companies.
2.3. Organic Listings
Organic results are created by search engine’s
algorithms, which rank the pages of websites
based on various factors, such as content rel-
evance, number and rank of incoming links, and
link structure. The organic listing is generated
at no cost to the company. The search engine
generates a ranked listing of sites based on the
relevant keywords used by the user in a query.
The sites listed first are those that are identified
most relevant by the search engine’s algorithms.
2.4. SEO
SEO is the process of improving the visibility of
a website through organic searches on a search
engine results page through different ranking
algorithms. SEO can be broken into four major
categories: key word/key phrase research and
selection, getting the search engines to index
the site, on-page optimization, and offpage
optimization (Refer to Killoran, 2013 on SEO
techniques). In addition to these techniques,
companies optimize their website to ensure that
once a website is visible, the user will want to
stay on the page to eventually make a sale or
to find information about product or service.
As we stated earlier, many SMEs do not know
the benefits of SEO (Kritzinger and Weideman,
2013), however, those SMEs that are able to
utilize SEO may find benefits that will allow
them to have an advantage over other firms.
With SEO, there is no guarantee that the
conversion to a sale will happen. Businesses do
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 31
not know that customers will actually purchase
an item just because they clicked on the website
through the sponsored section. With SEO, busi-
nesses may hire SEO experts to help identify
the best keywords to optimize their website
to increase their ranking in organic results on
search engines. Although SMEs are usually
more cost-conscious, it can be disastrous if they
attempt to optimize their website themselves,
since SMEs could possibly ruin their sites
beyond repair.
Leveraging search engine optimization
to improve organic search ranking is believed
to be more effective than other search engine
related marketing initiatives, such as search
engine advertising via sponsored links. Hotch-
kiss et al. (2004) found that more than 77% of
the 425 respondents surveyed favored organic
results rather than sponsored links. Even in an
e-commerce scenario as provided in Hotch-
kiss et al.’s study, survey respondents would
still choose organic over sponsored links. In a
follow-up study, Hotchkiss (2004) found that
participants rated the sponsored listings as lower
quality. In their study, the results also indicated
that many users ignored or did not notice the
sponsored results, mainly due to their location
on the right side of the page. Greenspan (2004)
also found that users preferred organic listings
compared to sponsored links and that users
would eventually select sponsored listings when
they were not identified as such on the SERP.
It seems that users felt that sponsored listings
were another form on advertisements pushed
to them by the companies; whereas, organic
results were based on how relevant the results
were to the query. Brooks (2004a) found that the
likelihood of a searcher selecting a sponsored
listing is a curvilinear function of its placement
on the page (i.e., based on rank). The higher the
link’s placement in the results listing, the more
likely a searcher is to select it. The study found
similar results with organic listings. The differ-
ence between the 1st and the 10th positions is a
20 to 30% drop in click through for the listing.
In a related study, Brooks (2004b) reported that
the conversion rate (i.e., customers who interact
with the company through purchasing an item
or filling out a contact form) drops nearly 90%
between the 1st and 10th positions.
Although there are many practitioner
articles regarding SEO, there are only a few
published academic articles in this area (Zing
& Lin, 2006).
Other studies have identified steps to in-
crease a company’s website ranking in organic
results (Raisinghani, 2005; Zhang & Dimitroff,
2005; Curran, 2004). Dou et al. (2010) used
rankings on SERPs to differentiate lower level
brands from their competitors. They conducted
two experiments to establish that when users’
schema regarding the display orders on SERPs
along with priming, they were able to recall
lower brand items over well-known brands.
They found that users were able to use their
belief on display order (schema) to influence
users’ processing of inconsistent information
in SERPs.
There are even further limited studies on the
use of SEO by SMEs, and the benefits of such
use are thus unclear. The need for research in
the impact of SEO, particularly among SMEs,
therefore, is warranted. Among the few prior
studies that examined the benefits of SEO
includes an action research by Malaga (2007),
who found the benefit of an SEO project is
more cost-effective than a Pay Per Click (PPC)
campaign. However, this study only used one
website and one type of product, findings of
the study on the benefits of SEO may not be
generalizable to other websites or products. In
addition, the cost of the SEO project for the
organization might be significantly lower since
the author conducted it himself. Whereas, in
reality, SMEs would often hire SEO consulting
companies to engage in SEO, which could have
skewed the ROI in Malaga’s study.
Kritzinger and Weideman (2013) found that
the few companies that invest in PPC campaigns
do not have organic listings within the top 100
results on SERPs. They state that although the
benefits of SEO are more important, website
marketers do not include SEO in their market-
ing plan. This is due to the fact that companies
do not have the skill to implement SEO on
their own; whereas PPC campaigns are easily
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
32 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
adopted because business owners can easily
manage such campaigns. They state that “some
website owners have heard of SEO before, but
do not know what it is or what benefits it could
have for their websites” (pg. 284). The authors
state that these companies should outsource to
SEO companies that will help them to imple-
ment SEO.
In another study, Moreno and Martinez
(2013) found a clear relationship between web
accessibility guidelines based on WCAG 2.0 and
SEO on-page factors. They found that based
on as a result of this relationship, barriers to
website accessibility has a negative influence
on the rankings on the SERPs, similar to the use
of SEO techniques that may improve website
accessibility. They state that bad navigation and
presence of certain web scripts can be blamed
for a webpage’s low rankings by a search en-
gine since it a barrier to user accessibility and
interaction with the website. The authors state
that previously that SEO and web accessibility
were conducted by experts in different fields.
However, they provide evidence of a clear
relationship between SEO factors and web
accessibility guidelines. The authors believe
the barriers to accessibility can negatively
influence search rankings and believe that ac-
cess to web content is the link between SEO
and web accessibility. Moreno and Martinez’s
study was the first to date that started to show
additional benefits of using SEO. However,
they did not shown any relationship between
SEO and performance of SMEs, which is the
aim of this study.
The importance of increasing web traffic
stems from the fact that traffic reflects users’
interest in the website and potential sales on
the website (Pan et al., 2002). Increased web
traffic are also predictors of sales at a retailer
level (Brynjolfsson & Smith, 2000); since
customers may first investigate offerings on
the website before going to the actual store.
Furthermore, web traffic is also a measure of
success for Internet websites, since higher traf-
fic can generate higher advertisement revenues
that are placed on the site.
We believe that visit duration is another
indication of web accessibility and relevant
web content which increases through SEO.
Visit duration is defined as the amount of time a
user is on a website and has become a standard
measure that is reported by Internet measure
agencies, such as ComScore Media Metrix,
Hitwise, and Nielsen/NetRatings. There are
many advantages to measure visit duration.
First, it is directly tied to a website’s revenue
and promotional benefits (Bhat et al., 2002;
Briggs & Hollis, 1997; Bucklin & Sismeiro,
2003; Danaher & Mullarky, 2003; Danaher et
al., 2006; Dreze & Zufryden, 1997). Second,
longer visit duration helps maintain the users
interest in a site (Bucklin & Sismeiro, 2003;
Hanson, 2000) and gives user more time to
make decisions and complete purchase transac-
tions (Bucklin & Sismeiro, 2003). User interest
also helps generate repeat visits, which have
shown to lead to long-term sales (Moe & Fader,
2004). Some investors use website durations
as an indicator of future earnings and studies
have shown that longer visit duration leads to
higher monthly stock returns (Demers & Lev,
2001). In another study, Zhenhui et al. (2010),
found an increase in website involvement by
users also leads to higher purchase intention.
Visit duration is sometimes referred to as
“stickiness” (Bhat et al., 2002). As a result of
repeat traffic and more time spent on the website,
customers become much stickier to the websites
and the transaction volumes increase (Zott et al.,
2000). Likewise, a web user’s intention to stay
longer on a website is believed to be influenced
by their perception of how valuable the website
is. Therefore, a user’s perception of the website
value will influence their intention to stick (Lip-
pert & Wilder, 2001). If the website design is
poor and information content is minimal and
disorganized, customers tend to leave a website
to find another website with useful information.
This results in loss of potential sales.
Based on organic results, Serrano-Cinca
et al. (2010) conducted a study with 138 US
web-based business and to analyze their website
visibility, their rankings on search engines, their
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 33
reputation and popularity. The authors found that
companies achieve a high position because they
are popular with consumers in areas of blogs
or online media. Other companies were able to
attain a high position on search engines because
of the large number of websites that linked
to their virtual shops. However, the authors
conclude that since the data was from publi-
cally available sources, they were not able to
provide information regarding internal aspects
of the company. They state “Other qualitative
research techniques would be useful to advance
research into the relationship between Internet
positioning and performance” (p. 247).
Gandour and Regolini (2011) conducted
a case study, where the authors performed an
SEO campaign on the company, Fragfomet,
and reviewed the effects of the campaign on the
website. The authors go into detail on the SEO
techniques they conducted: adding appropriate
keywords, in page optimization, updating tags,
URLs and title attributes. The found that the
SEO campaign was successful for the company
but that continuous evaluation of the website
was needed to ensure that rankings on search
engines remain high. However, since one firm
was used for this study and the SEO experts
were the authors, we believe using a multi-case
methodology using SEO experts (unfamiliar to
the research study) will provide further insight
into the additional influences of SEO.
3. RESEARCH METHOD
This research aims to study the additional influ-
ences of SEO on performance of SMEs. To date,
most of the research on SEO has been focused
on the development of different algorithms
for SEO and how consumers review ranked
results to find relevant information. Little is
done to evaluate how SEO impacts websites
and eventually business performance for SMEs;
empirical evidence in that regard to an SME
context is even scarcer. A qualitative method-
ology is utilized when the area of research is
mainly exploratory and appropriate in areas
such as SEO where there is a deficiency in
the body of knowledge and the factors are not
yet fully defined. Furthermore, Serrano-Cinca
et al. (2010) state “Other qualitative research
techniques would be useful to advance research
into the relationship between Internet position-
ing and performance” (p. 247).
A case study is an “empirical inquiry that
investigates a contemporary phenomenon
within its real-life context, especially where
the boundaries between the phenomenon and
context are not clearly evidenced” (Yin, 1994).
A methodology consisting of a case study pro-
vides rich and relative data, and it is the most
used qualitative method in information systems
research (Benbasat et al., 1987; Orlikowski &
Baroudi, 1991; Galliers, 1992; Myers, 1997;
Yin, 1994). It is appropriate to use a case study
when theoretical knowledge on the phenomenon
which is being studied is limited and there is not
sufficient knowledge on the topic (Benbasat et
al., 1987). The benefits of the multi-case study
have been discussed by other information sys-
tems researchers (Yin, 1994; Benbasat et al.,
1987). According to Yin (1994), a case study
can involve single or multiple cases and various
levels of analysis. Benbasat et al. (1987) argue
that multiple case studies enable the researcher
to relate to differences in process and outcomes.
Miles and Huberman (1984) added that multiple
cases enable the researcher to verify that find-
ings are not merely the result of idiosyncrasies
of the research setting.
To gather information about the companies
in our case study, we first administered a brief
structured survey to the twenty-two SMEs that
had a business relationship with an external
SEO consulting firm. The survey collected
data on the firms and their investment and
use of SEO as well as the impact of such use.
Three of the twenty-two firms were willing to
participate in the further in-depth case study.
For the three companies, we contacted the firms
and requested for an opportunity for in-depth
interview with upper management and further
collection of archival information related to
their use of SEO. The interview procedure
was semi-structured: while all interviewees
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
34 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
were requested to respond to a list of structured
questions related to their use of SEO, they were
encouraged to freely share any information
on SEO. During the interview, we carefully
recorded all comments from the interviewees.
We also interviewed SEO experts to identify
what types of SEO techniques were conducted
for each company (see Table 1).
To enhance the rigor of the study, we have
strictly followed the principles for case study
data collection proposed by Yin (1994):
• Use multiple sources of evidence: Mul-
tiple data sources can contribute to a high
degree of validity. In our study, we inter-
viewed companies that utilized SEO as well
as consultants that engaged in SEO services
for many companies. Prior to that, we also
collected data on the firms via structured
surveys. Furthermore, from our contacts
at the SEO consulting firm, we obtained
various documents collected from Google
Analytics on the three companies that we
interviewed. Those documents provide
us with rich data which show patterns
of traffic and website usage prior to, and
after, SEO. Those include performance
indicators for the SME’s website, such
as organic results of their websites prior
to and after SEO, number of visits to the
website and the average of duration on the
website. In addition, we obtained financial
reports and other useful information about
the companies from some secondary data
sources, such as the companies’ websites;
• Creating a case study database: A case
study database helps to increase the reli-
ability of the case study (Yin, 1994). In
our study, we create a database for each of
the three case companies to host a variety
of data and information pertaining to the
company, which includes detailed notes
from our interviews with the company, data
from the structured surveys archival data
and data regarding website performance
from Google Analytics on the company.
Structured, organized storage of all data
and information from diverse sources on
a particular case enables us to examine
and analyze those data in a holistic and
integrative fashion.
4. THE CASES
The SEO techniques conducted on all three
cases in this study were similar. As a prereq-
uisite to SEO, the websites were updated to
ensure content was relevant and user friendly.
This step is critical as stated by Moreno and
Martinez (2013) who found that proper rede-
sign of web content is needed to ensure quality
information is indexed by search engines. SEO
experts then identified keywords and phrases
that pertain to the business. They look to see
the competitiveness of the keywords to ensure
that users will find the business using those
terms in the search engine. SEO experts will
ensure that these keywords are utilized within
the website. The SEO expert will then manipu-
Table 1. Interviews
Company Title Date
EC President August 7, 2013
PL President August 15, 2013
CR Co-President August 17, 2013
SEO Consulting Group SEO Expert #1 April 5, 2013
SEO Consulting Group SEO Expert #2 April 5, 2013
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 35
late on-page factors and off-page links to make
the website more attractive to search engines.
Killoran (2013) describes the SEO techniques
in detail that SEO experts practice to ensure a
website’s rankings are increased.
4.1. Case 1: PL
PL is located in Linthicum, Maryland and is
operating in the transportation sector. It was
started in 1988, employing four fulltime and
three part-time people. PL is a broker that
provides personalized solutions to ground
transportation to business travelers. Clients
range from individuals to Fortune 500 compa-
nies. To date, they service approximately 350
clients. Their estimated annual revenue is $2
million. PL operates a call center in Linthicum
with no direct sales and all services orders are
placed through phone calls, email or through
their online form on their website.
When PL had its website created, the
company participated in Pay-Per-Click (PPC)
campaign with an SEO consulting firm. How-
ever, they did not find the appropriate conver-
sion rates based on the cost of participating in
the PPC campaign similar to results found in
Kritzinger and Weideman (2013). The president
of the company stated, “I believe being on the
Internet is a necessity. It is the ‘new’ phone
book. Organically appearing in the search list-
ings was a way to own our little corner of the
Internet world.”
PL was not aware of the actual ranking of
their website on any search engine. However,
the president would often search for his website
to see where his company would appear on the
list. After unsuccessful attempts at various PPC
campaigns with different consulting firms, the
president realized that these campaigns were not
useful and wanted to try another consulting firm.
He learned that it was easier to cut their losses
rather than continue with campaigns that were
not successful. Through other business contacts,
the president learned about SEO. He realized
that “building [their] rankings organically was
much more attractive” than a PPC campaign.
The rationale for starting an SEO cam-
paign was to have an Internet presence so that
clients (small and large) could find them when
searching for specific services. In addition,
the president thought he could tap into a non-
business market since the Internet reaches so
many people. Since starting an SEO campaign,
the president has stopped all other advertising
channels. He continues to add money to the
budget for SEO since he wants to stay innovative
in his marketing strategy by adding different
geographical areas. The president stated that
his website had about 100 visits a month before
and now after SEO, he says he gets about 1000
visits a month to his website (actual numbers
are provided in Figures 1 through 6). Accord-
ing to the president, “SEO has increased our
visibility and call volume, ultimately resulting
in increased sales. SEO has supplemented our
marketing and referral business by bringing in
new customers.”
Since the company does not have an ex-
pert in IT, the SEO consulting company also
redesigned the website since keeping the user
on the webpage was just as important as get-
ting the user to see the webpage on the search
engine. The president was very involved with
the SEO campaign and continues to meet and
brainstorm with the consultants regarding
keywords and targeted geographic areas. This
involvement is much different than the other
cases in this study and what the president
contributes to the success of the SEO efforts.
He receives monthly reports and has a few
meetings each quarter to discuss strategies. The
president feels that an SEO expert contributes
substantially in keeping an SME in step with
changes associated with the website and SEO
efforts. Due to some advice from his network,
the president has started to track where new
customers are hearing about his company. In
this way, he believes he will see the benefits
of SEO further and be able to identify the ROI
for such marketing campaigns. He feels that
greater visibility and increased sales is the
best benefits that PL has gained from SEO.
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
36 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
Figure 1. PL: Organic results for number of visits to website (per year)
Figure 2. PL: Organic results for average duration of users visiting website
Figure 3. EC: Organic results for number of visits to website (per year)
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 37
Figure 4. EC: Organic results for average duration of users visiting website
Figure 5. CR: Organic results for number of visits to website (per year)
Figure 6. CR: Organic results for average duration of users visiting website
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
38 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
4.2. Case 2: EC
Started in 2004, EC is located in Hanover, Mary-
land and focuses on countertop fabrication and
installation in homes. Their estimated revenue is
3 million dollars. Although they do not sell any
of their products online, EC uses the Internet
as a lead generation tool. The president of the
company states “SEO is an extremely important
part of our online strategy.” He has always used
SEO since the start of the company’s website.
However, he had used other forms of advertising
such as TV, radio and print ads, however, he
felt that the ROI was better with SEO. In addi-
tion, the president would talk to other business
owners in his network to identify what type of
marketing strategy worked for them. Many of
them agreed that SEO was a better strategy in
this technology world.
For EC, SEO impacted their sales and prof-
its plus diversified their revenue. The first year
they started the SEO campaign, their revenue
increased by $500k a year with a profit improve-
ment of 15% on that amount. EC did have to
change consulting companies when rankings
and revenue were declining. This decision to
leave consulting firms and switch to another
firm initially was a financial burden however,
since the change to the new consulting firm,
EC started to see profits and revenue increase
again. EC found that many consulting firms
will promise success; however, if a small firm
is not able to see the results, then they should
be willing to walk away. With SEO, EC states
that their client base has grown but they only
attribute 25% of the sales to the SEO campaign.
The president states that SEO was utilized to help
as part of their retail strategy, which is slightly
more profitable for them by 15%.
Unlike PL, EC did not participate heavily in
the SEO campaign. Besides selecting the SEO
consulting company, the company places all the
direction of the campaign in the hands of the
SEO experts to complete the job. He states that
companies will not pay for Google rankings,
however companies will pay for increased sales
and to achieve brand awareness and recogni-
tion. Therefore, SEO consultants should try to
understand what goals their customers are trying
to achieve as well as the cost a company incurs
for each sale they make. Since this is his second
business, the president is an experienced busi-
ness owner, who requested certain measures to
be set to quantify the budget for SEO services.
He meets with the SEO consulting company
quarterly to ensure that results are being met. In
Figure 2, we notice a significant increase in the
number of visits to the website after SEO. Just
as the other companies in our study, the SEO
consulting company also improved the com-
pany’s website so that customers were able to
easily navigate the website to find information,
to see photos and to view comments. Therefore,
we see a 10-second increase in the amount of
time that a visitor stays on the EC website. This
is a positive sign because the longer a customer
stays on a website, the higher the likelihood
the customer will make a sale (Bhatnagar &
Ghose, 2004).
The president suggests the major and
critical costs of an SEO campaign are the ongo-
ing cost of the project. In order to justify the
budget, he recommends creating measures and
checking them regularly to ensure that results
are being met. When asked to identify whether
the benefits outweigh the overall costs of the
SEO campaign, he stated, “It’s hard to say the
advantage of online marketing is to be able to
clearly understand the cost as a percentage of
sales. We try to keep marketing/advertising at
10% of sales, including PPC. …We are close
to those numbers.”
4.3. Case 3: CR
CR was started in 1929 and is an automotive
customization facility that specializes in car
audio, keyless systems, interiors, radio and
speedometer cluster repair. The company sells
its products in house at its facility in Catons-
ville, Maryland. It has about 4300 clients per
year and estimates 1.1 million average annual
sales. Like many small businesses, CR had a
website but it was not aesthetically appealing
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 39
nor did the website help with driving business
into the facility. CR’s co-president, stated that
they heard about SEO from their social network
and was referred to their current SEO consulting
company through business contacts. Although
one of managing members needed time to
think about such an investment in SEO, the co-
president states that their desire to eventually
start the SEO project was partially influenced
by the need to beat their competitors. However,
the major reason why they eventually moved
forward with the SEO project was “to help the
world find us here in Catonsville.”
CR was actively involved in the SEO
project with the SEO consulting company and
the co-president provided inputs himself and
reviewed the website redesign before it was
re-launched. Since this was a new area for the
members of CR, they relied on the expertise
of the SEO consulting company but wanted to
still be involved in the optimization.
The company pointed out that they were
not aware of their rankings prior to the SEO
campaign. However, now after being involved
in the SEO campaign, they are very knowl-
edgeable about the rankings of their website
on various search engines and is aware that
their website is ranked higher now with “…
the increased call volume and foot traffic since
the re-launch of the website and SEO.” The
co-president commented, “SEO did not directly
affect profitability but did increase revenue by
increasing overall sales.”
Now that they have finally seen the benefits
of SEO, CR is pleased with the investment to
start the project. He said that “without a doubt”
the overall benefits outweigh the overall costs
of the SEO campaign. “There was virtually no
risk involved”, said the co-president:
Sure the process takes a small investment but the
investment will be returned and profited upon
in the long run. Be open-minded to this method
of advertising. As someone who grew up in the
paper and TV advertising world it is sometimes
hard to wrap your head around the idea of pay-
ing a company to ‘optimize a website.’ When
you think about it next to nobody reads paper
advertisements, and less and less people have
time to watch TV ads (which are only effective
long term and require a lot of money). Everyone
has a smartphone now and at a minimum a
computer. When the newspapers of the world
are printing less and less and now offering their
newspapers online, I think it’s obvious that the
world has turned to the Internet. With that be-
ing said I couldn’t afford to keep my company
hidden. By having an effective website that has
been Search Engine Optimized I have now taken
my 10,000 square foot store in Catonsville and
exposed it not just to the people of the Baltimore
area, but rather the world.
Based on actual results from organic
searches, there was a large increase in number
of website visits and the average duration
of users on the CR’s website (See Figures
3 and 6) after SEO was conducted. This is
important for CR, since they were compet-
ing with many other companies in the area
for business. The company has established
its web presence, but if it didn’t increase its
visibility, it was not going to be successful.
After the SEO campaign, CR experienced
large volume of phone calls foot traffic which
in turn increased their overall sales. The in-
crease in web traffic was a gradual increase
over a few months that was tracked after the
launch of the SEO campaign.
5. CASE SYNTHESIS
While the three companies we study operate in
different industries and start SEO for different
reasons, they converge quite well in the results
of SEOs, which reveal important business as
well as performance impacts of SEOs. We,
therefore, synthesize the three cases and based
on our understanding, have identified four per-
formance impacts of SEO for SMEs in addition
to an increase to the rankings on SERPs.
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
40 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
5.1. Influence of SEO
on Performance
5.1.1. The Use of SEO by an
SME Impacts the Number of Visits
to the Company’s Website
This impact is strong based on the data from the
three cases. “I believe being on the Internet is a
necessity. It is the ‘new’ phone book. Organi-
cally appearing in the search listings was a way
to own our little corner of the Internet world,”
says PL. The three companies in this study all
realized the potential of using the Internet and
increasing web traffic. Websites are an important
form of advertising, which is competing with
TV marketing and the print industry (Rubinson,
2009; Kanso & Nelson, 2004; Gallagher et
al., 2001). The president from CR stated, “As
someone who grew up in the Paper and TV
advertising world it is sometimes hard to wrap
your head around the idea of paying a company
to “create a website and optimize a website”. He
and the other CEOs have to “be open-minded
to this method of advertising.” Companies are
seeking new ways to reach customers and have
shifted media budgets away from traditional
media, such as television or print to new media
such as the Internet, where customers can be
targeted more precisely (Hample et al., 2012).
Therefore, creating a website is not enough.
Companies need to draw customers to the web-
site. SEO enables small businesses to reach more
customers through higher ranking on search
engines. In order to increase website traffic, a
company’s website’s visibility needs to increase.
Following Dreze & Zufryden (2004), we define
visibility as the extent to which a user is likely
to come across a reference to a company’s
website in his or her online environment. It is
important to have your website visible since
there is a growing number of websites online
as well as the increased competition that com-
panies engage in to attract customers to their
websites (Adamic & Huberman, 1999). Previ-
ously, website visibility was often completed
by advertising, publicity, or word of mouth
through blogs and reviews. Studies show that
online ads influence customer loyalty scores
and website visits (Briggs & Hollis, 1997; Ilfeld
& Winer, 2002). However, Dreze & Zufryden
(2004) found these type of advertising spent by
companies is uncorrelated to website traffic.
Furthermore, SMEs do not have the resources
to increase website traffic without thinking
outside the box and incorporating techniques
such as SEO. Through higher rankings, SEO
techniques can help SMEs make their website
more visible to customers and compete with
larger companies. SEO techniques can provide
SMEs with targeting customers within specific
zip codes, where the SME is located. As more
users click on the website and increase website
traffic, the ranking of the website continues to
remain on the top of the SERP.
5.1.2. The Use of SEO by an
SME Impacts the Average
Time Duration of Users Visiting
the Company’s Website
This is a strong impact based on the data from
the case studies. Internet users can easily move
from one website to another. Furthermore, the
nature of the Internet has enabled users to search
for information and compare prices and services
with little costs. Therefore, the challenge for
businesses is how to attract the attention of the
customers. When utilizing SEO techniques, a
company’s website is ranked higher so that it can
be easily accessed by Internet users. However,
if the user does not stay on the website to learn
more about the products or services, ranking
higher on the search results page becomes use-
less. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the
company to keep the website visitor as long as
it can, since the probability of making a sale
increase as the customer stays there longer
(Bhatnagar & Ghose, 2004).
All three of our SMEs had their websites
improved and redesigned to ensure that users
are able to easily navigate the website and
want to stay longer on the website. Therefore,
an equally important performance measure to
determine SEO success is the visit duration.
Based on a study by Moreno and Martinez
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 41
(2013), web content is the link between SEO
and web accessibility. If the web content is not
relevant, then the user will not want to interact
with page. The appropriate design of websites
is of utmost importance in increasing the likeli-
hood that the website will be used effectively to
fulfill desired functions as well as visit duration.
Website design, attitude, and trust have been
identified as key factors affecting customer’s
visits and purchase intention (Liang & Lai,
2007). Therefore, website design features can
influence positive attitudes (Stevenson et al.,
2000) towards the company, which can lead to
longer visit duration. Websites have a number
of other important characteristics besides con-
tent; they include organization of information,
the ease with which the website can be used
and technical characteristics. The organiza-
tion of the information (Kumar, et al., 2004)
describes aspects related to how the information
is arranged on the website. These include the
general layout, the number and effectiveness of
hyperlinks (Abels, 1997; Shneiderman, 1998).
The SMEs in our case studies stated that their
website’s design was optimized through the
SEO campaign. Content on the website was
made relevant and hyperlinks were made ef-
fective for longer visit duration, easy decision
making and purchasing. This is identified as
on-page categorization of SEO.
In this study, all three cases showed an
increase in average visit duration after SEO. PL
had a 13 second increase EC had a 10 second
increase and CR had an increase of 18 seconds
(See Figures 2, 4, 6). These results empirically
demonstrate that SEOs positively impacts the
average time duration of users visiting an
SME’s website.
5.1.3. The Use of SEO by an SME
Impacts Its Annual Sales Revenue
By utilizing SEO, the three companies in this
study all saw an increase in web traffic to the
site and visit duration, which offer a potential
for the company to increase their overall sales
revenue. Therefore, this is a strong impact.
After careful study of the companies’ financial
performance, we find that the increase of web
traffic and visit duration have indeed materi-
alized and turned into sales revenue increase.
This is similar to Saeed et al.’s study (2005),
who found that firms with high e-commerce
competence exhibit superior firm performance,
which was mediated by web site functionality.
Two of the companies were actively
measuring their successes with goals and see-
ing their sales increase due to the volume of
calls and foot traffic entering the retail store
after initiating an SEO campaign to increase
their website’s ranking. EC further tracks the
acquired sales based on how the customers
found their services. For example, if someone
requested countertops to be installed in their
kitchen, they tracked whether the customer was
referred to them by a friend or if the customer
found them on the Internet through the checkout
process. Most of the time, customers found the
EC through the Internet, which identifies that
SEO helped the company increase traffic. In this
way, EC says they are able to justify the budget
for SEO by tracking the web traffic results. CR
states the ROI in SEO can be verified through
higher foot traffic and the volume of calls per
day. After SEO, the number of customers that
were interested in their products substantially
increased. CR states that the company has seen
an increase in sales since he started using SEO
for his website. Therefore, he recommends SEO
to increase a website’s ranking as better market-
ing approach than TV or print ads.
In the first year EC started the SEO
campaign, their revenue increased by 500k
a year with a profit improvement of 15% on
that amount. The company attributes 25% of
the sales to the SEO campaign. Furthermore,
EC’s client base has grown substantially, which
provides a solid foundation for future sales
revenues. The president feels the major and
critical costs of an SEO campaign is the ongo-
ing cost of the project. In order to justify the
budget, he recommends creating measures and
checking them regularly to ensure that results
are being met. The other two companies, PL
and CR, are not creating measures to check
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
42 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
the results from SEO. Since there is no way to
identify whether the website visits converted
into a sale, CR says they value SEO success
through the large volumes of calls and foot traffic
which in turn increased their overall sales. Kay
states “SEO did not directly affect profitability
but did increase revenue by increasing overall
sales.” According to Corcoran from PL, “SEO
has increased our visibility and call volume,
ultimately resulting in increased sales. SEO
has supplemented our marketing and referral
business by bringing in new customers.”
5.1.4. The Use of SEO
by an SME Impacts User
Engagement on the Website
Based on the case material, we found that this
is a strong impact. SEO can influence the user
engagement or user interaction on the website.
User engagement has been found to increase
performance (Lee et al., 2011). EC has a con-
tact form which was appropriately created and
placed on the website through optimization
and, during a one-month span, it received 36
requests for estimates compared to none the
previous year. This form’s conversion rate can
be measured through “Goals” within Google
Analytics. The more “Goals” that are estab-
lished on a website provides more measures
that companies can use to track the benefits
of SEO. Goals are able to measure how well
your website is meeting its target objectives.
The common “goals” companies focus on are
duration and pages per session. However, the
firms in our study found that creating other
goals specifically event based goals, lead to
more interaction with the user which shows a
greater amount of participation on the webpage.
This is similar to the findings in Zhenhui et al.’s
study (2010), where they found an increase in
website involvement by users leads to higher
purchase intention.
Just like in the case of EC, prior to SEO,
CR’s website provided no form to contact
potential customers. After the update to the
website and SEO, CR’s website now offers a
contact form where customers can place their
information to receive a phone call. Since the
launch of this form on the website in 2011,
there have been 86 users that have filled out
this form. . With the SEO campaign, the form
was filled out more since the website’s ranking
increase causing more visibility and traffic to
the website. SMEs can measure various kinds
of goals to ensure that they are benefitting from
a well-designed website as well as the SEO
campaign. As stated earlier, the more goals that
an SME has to measure, the more ways that it
can estimate how well the SEO campaign is
being conducted. The number of customers that
fill out the contact request forms is now one
of the ways, in addition to an increase of sales
and web traffic, that CR converts the costs of
SEO into benefits.
5.1.5. SMEs should become
Knowledgeable of SEO Techniques
to ensure that SEO Experts are
using only White Hat Techniques
There are two types of SEO techniques: white
hat and black hat. Since many SMEs are not
aware of the benefits of SEO, they may not also
be aware of the different techniques involved
with ensure a successful campaign. White hat
techniques are ethical measures that are appro-
priate for search engines rankings (Jones, 2013;
Grappone and Couzin, 2010). These techniques
include appropriate additions of keywords, easy
navigation of websites, providing quality con-
tent, using blogs, social media and videos to link
back to the website. However, these techniques
have to be done appropriately otherwise, they
can lend themselves to black hat techniques.
Black hat techniques involve unethical measures
to increase rankings on a search engines. These
techniques are not approved by search engines
and when identified being utilized, search
engines will remove these websites from their
rankings completely. Factors such as keyword
stuffing, invisible text, doorway pages, illegal
linking should be avoided (Dye, 2008; Magna,
2008). Since algorithms that rank listings on
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 43
search engines are not known, SEO experts
are able to understand patterns and behaviors
to ensure how to increase rankings within the
acceptable limits of search engines. Su et al.
(2014) provide evidence that there are many
SEO methodologies that have created myths and
fallacies associated with the different algorithms
of search engines. Therefore, it is important to
ensure that experts are used when engaging
in SEO or being knowledgeable in white hat
techniques so that websites are not penalized or
removed from a search engine rankings.
6. CONCLUSION
6.1. Unique Contribution
This study investigates the performance im-
pacts of SEOs on SMEs through the process
of conducting an SEO campaign from SEO
experts. The unique contribution of this study
is through in-depth studies of three SMEs in
Maryland that have conducted SEOs, we find
that SEOs have substantial positive impacts on
number of user visits to SME websites, average
duration of user visits, as well as the company’s
overall sales revenues. This study can help be
reference for other SMEs looking to engage in
SEO campaigns. Based on our study, we found
SMEs were not aware of all the benefits of SEO.
Therefore, we recognized that factors for SMEs
to successful in SEO would be to identify an
SEO expert to help with the campaign. Next,
SMEs should identify if customers are coming
to their business based on search engine results.
This provide evidence whether SEO is effec-
tively being conducted, since the goal of SEO
is to increase the business’s organic rankings.
Finally, SMEs should be involved with the
SEO campaign regardless of the initial lack of
knowledge. It is important for SMEs to become
educated on the different techniques that are
involved in SEO. In this study, we focused on
white hat techniques; however, there are other
techniques that are not ethical to conduct, which
would cause search engines to remove the list-
ing completely from their database.
6.2. Managerial Contributions
This study has important managerial contribu-
tions. The findings of this research illustrate
that, with appropriate managerial support and
tracking of measures from the SEO campaign,
SMEs can achieve website performance en-
hancement and revenue growth while using
the Internet as the backbone to compete with
larger organizations. The findings may help
raise awareness of, and confidence in, business
impacts of SEOs, and stimulate the adoption and
diffusion of SEOs among SMEs. Given scarcer
resources and limited access to other traditional
marketing mechanisms, small and medium-
sized enterprises often desire an affordable
Internet marketing campaign channel to enhance
market reach and competitiveness. SEOs are
demonstrated in this study to be an affordable,
feasible, and effective approach to enhancing
business exposure, building customer base,
increasing website traffic and traffic interest,
and ultimately increasing business revenue and
profitability. Because little empirical evidence
exists on the SEO business impacts to SMEs, the
findings of this study are especially important
in building confidence and triggering interests
in SEOs among SMEs. Furthermore, there
was heavy involvement of upper management
throughout the SEO process with SEO experts
with all three cases. Although SMEs may not
understand SEO, they should ask questions and
be involved with the campaign to ensure suc-
cess. This study should help SMEs understand
what type of performance measures to identify
as an indicator of success.
6.3. Limitations
While highlighting the important contributions
of the study, we point out limitations of this
study and some opportunities for future re-
search. As the cases we analyze in this research
are all from a convenient sample, caution is
warranted while applying them to other firms,
including SMEs. However, it is not the goal of
an interpretive study to make generalizations
from the examined SMEs, but rather to offer
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
44 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
insight about the impact of SEO for SMEs. A
rich, thick description of the case allows read-
ers to make decisions regarding transferability
of the research (Merriam, 1988). Large-scale
empirical studies are encouraged in the future
to test the propositions statistically in other
contexts.
Another limitation in this study is that
we did not examine the impact of different
investment level in SEOs on performance
impacts. But in reality, investment level may
make significant difference: while lower level
investment marked with simple modification
of website and keywords may yield relatively
less impact on performance, sophisticated SEOs
are expected to achieve higher impacts. The
SMEs were hesitate to provide any financial
statements.
6.4. Future Research Directions
In this study, we focused on SEO experts that uti-
lized white hat techniques to improve websites.
However, there are SEO experts that engage in
black hat techniques, which are unethical and
will cause search engines to ban company’s
website from their rankings. Future studies may
investigate additional issues related to critical
failures of using SEO by SMEs. Empirical
studies may consider quantifying investment
level and performance impacts and examining
their correlations. The study also offers impor-
tant theoretical implications for future studies.
Building upon three cases, we formulated four
performance influences of SEOs which were
number of visits, duration of visits, number of
engagement goals and overall sales revenues.
These factors can form theoretical propositions
for an important theoretical foundation for fu-
ture empirical research on the impact of SEOs,
particularly among SMEs. Other studies may
choose to focus on the end user and investigate
where they find their information to complete
e-commerce tasks on non-SEO websites versus
SEO websites. This will provide insight into
whether users are able to find content easier
on websites that were optimized versus not
optimized.
REFERENCES
Abels, E. G., White, M. D., & Hahn, K. (1997).
Identifying user-based criteria for Web pages. Inter-
net Res. Electronic Networking Applications Policy,
7(4), 252–262. doi:10.1108/10662249710187141
Abouzeedan, A. (2011). SME Performance and
Its Relationship to Innovation, Dissertation No
1364, LiU-Tryck, Linkoping, Sweden. (ISBN 978-
91-7393-219-6). Retrieved May 15, 2014, from
http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:447516/
FULLTEXT01.pdf
Acs, Z. J., & Yeung, B. (1999). Conclusion in small
and medium-sized enterprises. In Z. J. Acs & B.
Yeung (Eds.), The Global Economy (pp. 164–173).
Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Administration. Retrieved from: http://www.sba.
gov/advo/research/wkpapers.html Last retrieved
15 May, 2014.
Agarwal, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a
firm’s web presence: A heuristic evaluation proce-
dure for the measurement of usability. Information
Systems Research, 13(2), 168–186. doi:10.1287/
isre.13.2.168.84
Anderson, A., & Miller, C. (2003). Class matters:
Human and social capital in the entrepreneurial
process. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(1), 17–36.
doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00009-X
Ao-Jan, S., Hu, Y., Kuzmanovic, A., & Cheng-Kok,
K. (2014). How to Improve Your Search Engine
Ranking: Myths and Reality. ACM Transactions On
The Web, 8(2), 1–25. doi:10.1145/2579990
Bannister, F. (2001). The silos: Extracting new
value from IT investments in public administra-
tion. Information Systems Journal, 11(1), 65–84.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00094.x
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987).
The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Informa-
tion Systems. Management Information Systems
Quarterly, 11(3), 369–385. doi:10.2307/248684
Bennett, R. & Robson, P. (1999). The use of
external business advice by SME’s in Britain,
Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,(11),
155–80.10.1080/089856299283245
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G.
Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research
for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). New
York: Greenwood Press.
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 45
Brooks, N. (2004a, July). The Atlas Rank Report I:
How search engine rank impacts traffic. Retrieved
August 22, 2012 from http://www.atlasdmt.com/
media/pdfs/insights/RankReport.pdf
Brooks, N. (2004b, October). The Atlas Rank Report
II: How search engine rank impacts conversions.
Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://surf2your.
pages.com.au/resources/RankReportPart2.pdf
Bruderl, J., & Preisendorfer, P. (1998). Network
support and the success of newly founded busi-
nesses. Small Business Economics, 10(10), 213–225.
doi:10.1023/A:1007997102930
Chen, M. (1996). Competitor analysis and Interfirm
rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy
of Management Review, 21, 100–134.
(1992). Choosing Information Systems Research. In-
Galliers, R. D. (Ed.), Information Systems Research.
Oxfordshire: Alfred Waller Ltd.
Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The Five
Stages of Small Business Growth. Harvard Business
Review, 61(3), 30–39.
Clark, M., III, & Moutray, C. (2004). The future
of small businesses in the U.S. federal government
marketplace. Working paper, Office of Advocacy,
U.S. Small Business
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University
Press.
Cronin-Gilmore, J. (2012). Exploring Marketing
Strategies in Small Business. Journal of Marketing
Development and Competitiveness, 6(1), 96–107.
Curran, K. (2004). Tips for achieving high position-
ing in the results pages of the major search engines.
Information Technology Journal, 3(2), 202–205.
doi:10.3923/itj.2004.202.205
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation:
A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and
Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3),
555–590. doi:10.2307/256406
Dehkordi, G. J., Rezvani, S., Salehi, M., & Eghtebasi,
S., & HasanAbadi, A. (2012). Conceptual analysis
of the key success of business in terms of Internet
marketing. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contempo-
rary Research in Business, 4(1), 811–816.
Dou, W., Lim, K. H., Su, C., Zhou, N., & Cui, N.
(2010). Brand Positioning Strategy Using Search
Engine Marketing. Management Information Systems
Quarterly, 34(2), 261–279.
Dye, K. (2008). SEO Attack: Website abuse for
search engine optimisation. Network Security,
20084–20086.
Enge, E., Spencer, S., Stricchiola, J., & Fishkin, R.
(2012). The Art of SEO: Mastering Search Engine
Optimization. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Enquiro. (2007). The Brand Lift of Search. Retrieved
May 25, 2012 from http://pages.enquiro.com/
whitepaper-the-brand-lift-of-search.html
Fusco, P. J. (2006). Can Big Brands Own ‘It’? ClickZ.
Retrieved on May 5, 2012 from http://www.clickz.
com/showPage.html?page=3623640
Gallagher, K., Foster, K. D., & Parsons, J. (2001).
The Medium is Not the Message: Advertising Effec-
tiveness and Content Evaluation in Print and on the
Web. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(4), 57–70.
Gandal, N. (2001). The dynamics of competition in
the Internet search engine market. International Jour-
nal of Industrial Organization, 19(7), 1103–1117.
doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00065-0
Gilmore, A., Carson, D., & Grant, K. (2001). SME
marketing in practice. Marketing Intelligence & Plan-
ning, 19(1), 6–11. doi:10.1108/02634500110363583
Google Announces First Quarter 2012 Results and
Proposal for New Class of Stock. Retrieved on May
25, 2012 from http://investor.google.com/earn-
ings/2012/Q1_google_earnings.html
Gori, M., & Witten, I. (2005). The Bubble of Web
Visibility. Communications of the ACM, 48(3),
115–117. doi:10.1145/1047671.1047715
Grappone, J., & Couzin, G. (2010). Search Engine
Optimization (SEO) [electronic resource]: an Hour
a Day. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
Greenspan, R. (2004). Searching for balance. Re-
trieved August 22, 2012, from www.clickz.com/
stats/big_picture/applications/article.php/3348071
Gunasekaran, A., Rai, B. K., & Griffin, M. (2011).
Resilience and competitiveness of small and medium
size enterprises: An empirical research. International
Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5489–5509.
doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.563831
Hallerman, D. 2010. “Audience Ad Targeting: Data
and Privacy Issues,” technical report, eMarketer
Report.
Hambrick, D. C., & Crozier, L. M. (1985). Stumblers
and Stars in the Management of Rapid Growth.
Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 31–45.
doi:10.1016/0883-9026(85)90005-9
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
46 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with eth-
nography? Methodological explorations. London:
Routledge.
Hampel, S., Heinrich, D., & Campbel, C. (2012). Is An
Advertisement Worth The Paper It’s Printed on? The
Impact of Premium Print Advertising on Consumer
Perceptions. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1),
118–127. doi:10.2501/JAR-52-1-118-127
Hanks, S. H. (1990). The Organization Life Cycle:
Integrating Content and Process. Journal of Small
Business Strategy, 1(1), 1–13.
Hansell, S. (2007), “Google Keeps Tweaking Its
Search Engine,” New York Times.
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order
Effects in Belief Updating: The Belief–Adjust-
ment Model. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 1–55.
doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-J
Hotchkiss, G. (2004). Inside the mind of the searcher.
Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://www.enquiro.
com/research.asp
Hotchkiss, G., Garrison, M., & Jensen, S. (2004).
Search engine usage in North America. Retrieved
August 22, 2012, from http:// www.enquiro.com/
research.asp
Hourali, M., Fathian, M., Montazeri, A., & Hourali,
M. (2008). A Model for E-readiness Assessment of
Iranian Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of
Faculty of Engineering, 41(7), 969–985.
Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping
the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters.
The Information Society, (16): 169–180.
iProspect. (2006). iProspect Search Engine User
Behavior Study, Watertown, MA: iProspect.
Jansen, B. J. (2006). Paid Search. IEEE Computer,
39(7), 88–90. doi:10.1109/MC.2006.243
Jansen, B.J. (2007). The Comparative Effectiveness
of Sponsored and Nonsponsored Links for Web E-
commerce Queries. ACM Transactions on the Web,
1(1), article 3.
Jansen, B. J., & Molina, P. R. (2006). The ef-
fectiveness of Web search engines for retrieving
relevant ecommerce links. Information Processing
& Management, 42(4), 1075–1098. doi:10.1016/j.
ipm.2005.09.003
Jones, K. B. (2013). Search Engine Optimization
[electronic resource]: Your Visual Blueprint for Ef-
fective Internet Marketing. New York: Wiley, 2013.
Kanso, A. M., & Nelson, R. A. (2004). Internet
and Magazine Advertising: Integrated Partnerships
or Not? Journal of Advertising Research, 44(4),
317–326.
Keller, K. L., & Staelin, R. (1987). Effects of quality
and quantity of information on decision effectiveness.
The Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 200–213.
doi:10.1086/209106
Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., & Park, S.-J.
(2006). Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Ex-
ploring the Role of Application and IS Domain
Knowledge. Information Systems Research, 17(1),
81–99. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0081
Killoran, J. B. (2013). How to Use Search Engine Op-
timization Techniques to Increase Website Visibility.
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,
56(1), 50–66. doi:10.1109/TPC.2012.2237255
Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Schkade, D. A. (1993).
Information Displays and Decision Process-
es . Psychological Science, 4(4), 221–227.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00265.x
Kritzinger, W. T., & Weideman, M. (2013). Search
Engine Optimization and Pay-Per-Click Marketing
Strategies. Journal of Organizational Computing
and Electronic Commerce, 23(3), 273–286. doi:10.
1080/10919392.2013.808124
Kulviwat, S., Chiquan, G., & Engchanil, N. (2004).
Determinants of online information search: A critical
review and assessment. Internet Research, 14(3),
245–253. doi:10.1108/10662240410542670
Kumar, R. L., Smith, M. A., & Banerjee, S. (2004).
User interface features influencing overall ease of
use and personalization. Information & Management,
41(3), 289–302. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00075-
2
Kumar Nayak, J., Sinha, G., & Guin, K. K. (2007).
The Determinants and Impact of Outsourcing on
Small and Medium Enterprises -- An Empirical Study.
[Indian Institute of Management Bangalore]. IIMB
Management Review, 19(3), 277–284.
Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks:
External relations as sources for the growth and
competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entre-
preneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26.
doi:10.1080/08985620210159220
Lee, B., & Lee, W. (2004). The effect of information
overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line
environment. Psychology and Marketing, 21(3),
159–183. doi:10.1002/mar.20000
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 47
Lee, K. (2006). Paying for Shelf Space in the
Search Supermarket. Retrieved on May 25, 2012
from available at http://www.clickz.com/showPage.
html?page=3623308
Lee, S., Ungson, G. R., & Russo, M. V. (2011). What
determines an engaging website?: An empirical study
of website characteristics and operational perfor-
mance. The Journal of High Technology Management
Research, 2267–2279.
Levy, M., Powell, P., & Worrall, L. (2005). Strategic
Intent and E-business in SMEs: Enablers and Inhibi-
tors. Information Resources Management Journal,
18(4), 1–20. doi:10.4018/irmj.2005100101
Liang, T., Lai, H., & Ku, Y. (2007). Personalized
content recommendation and user satisfaction:
Theoretical synthesis and empirical findings. Journal
of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 45–70.
doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230303
Lohse, G. L., Bellman, S., & Johnson, E. J. (2000).
Consumer buying behaviour on the internet:
Findings from panel data. Journal of Interactive
Marketing, 14(1), 15–29. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-
6653(200024)14:1<15::AID-DIR2>3.0.CO;2-C
Lumpkin, G. (1998). Do New Entrants Have an
Entrepreneurial Orientation? Paper Presented at the
Academy of Management Meeting. San Diego, CA.
Lumpkin, G., & Dess, G. (1996). Clarifying the
entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it
to performance. Academy of Management Review,
21, 135–172.
Malaga, R. (2007). The Value of Search Engine
Optimization: An Action Research Project at a
New e-Commerce Site. Journal of Electronic Com-
merce in Organizations, 5(3), 68–82. doi:10.4018/
jeco.2007070105
Mallette, F. (2006). A Framework for Developing
your Financial Strategy. Corporate Financial Review,
10(5), 11–20.
McCarthy, T. (2005). Yahoo! Goes to Hollywood.
Time, 21, 50–53.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in
education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualita-
tive Data Analysis: A sourcebook of new methods.
Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.
Mithas, S., Tafti, A., Bardhan, I., & Mein Goh, J.
(2012). Information technology and firm profitabil-
ity: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. Manage-
ment Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 205–224.
Monk, R. (2000). Why small business fail? CMA
Management, 74(6), 12–13.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Voss, G. B., & Gre-
wal, D. (2003). Determinants of online channel
use and overall satisfaction with a relational,
multichannel service provider. Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 448–458.
doi:10.1177/0092070303254408
Moreno, L., & Martinez, P. (2013). Overlapping
factors in search engine optimization and web acces-
sibility. Online Information Review, 37(4), 564–580.
doi:10.1108/OIR-04-2012-0063
Morrison, D. G. (1979). Purchase intentions and
purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing, 43(2),
65–74. doi:10.2307/1250742
Myers, M. (1997). Interpretive research in infor-
mation systems. In J. Mingers & F. Stowell (Eds.),
Information systems: An emerging discipline (pp.
239–266). London: McGraw Hill.
Noaman, A. (2006). Pick Me! Pick Me! ABA Bank
Marketing, 38(7), 34–38.
O’Brien, T. (1971). Stages of consumer decision
making. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3),
283–289. doi:10.2307/3149564
Obafemi, A., Egbtokun, A., Olamade, O., & Siyan-
bola, W. (2009). Innovation in Nigeria Small and
Medium Enterprises: Types and Impact. Journal of
Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 7(4), 40–51.
doi:10.4018/jeco.2009100104
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying
Information Technology in Organisations: Research
Approaches and Assumptions. Information Systems
Research, 2(1), 1–28. doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.1
Palmer, J. W. (2002). Website usability, design, and
performance metrics. Information Systems Research,
13(2), 151–167. doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.151.88
Panda, T. K. (2013). Search Engine Marketing: Does
the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online
Retailers? IUP Journal Of Knowledge Management,
11(3), 56–66.
Pett, T. L., & Wolff, J. A. (2012). SME Identity
and Homogeneity – Are There Meaningful Differ-
ences Between Micro, Small and Medium-sized
Enterprises? Journal of Marketing Development and
Competitiveness, 6(2), 48–58.
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
48 Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015
Pieter, S. R., & Wedel, M. (2007). Goal Control of
Attention to Advertising: The Yarbus Implication.
The Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 224–233.
doi:10.1086/519150
Purcell, K. Brenner, J. & Rainie, L. (March 9, 2012)
Search Engine Use 2012. Pew Internet (available at
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Search-
Engine-Use-2012/Summary-of-findings.aspx; ac-
cessed May 2012)
Putnan, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s
declining social capital. Journal of Democracy,
61(1), 65–78. doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002
Raisinghani, M. S. (2005). Future trends in search
engines. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Orga-
nizations, 3, 3.
Ramdani, B., Kawalek, P., & Lorenzo, O. (2009).
Predicting SMEs’ Adoption of Enterprise Systems.
Journal of Enterprise Information Management,
22(1/2), 10–24. doi:10.1108/17410390910922796
Ranganathan, C., & Ganapathy, S. (2002). Key
dimensions of business-to-consumer sites. Informa-
tion & Management, 39(6), 457–465. doi:10.1016/
S0378-7206(01)00112-4
Rangaswamy, A., Lee Giles, C., & Seres, S. (2009).
A Strategic Perspective on Search Engines: Thought
Candies for Practitioners and Researchers. Journal of
Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 49–60. doi:10.1016/j.
intmar.2008.10.006
Robinson, A. T. (2014). Innovation Activity In En-
trepreneurial Firms: Technological Firm Attributes
And Environmental Dynamism As Determinants.
Academy Of Business Research Journal, 187-103.
Robinson, J. (2009). Empirical Evidence of TV
Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising
Research, 49(2), 20–226.
Ross, S., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. (2000).
Fundamentos de Finanzas Corporativas. Mexico:
Ed. Mc-Graw Hill.
Roussinov, D., & Chen, H. (2001). Information
navigation on the web by clustering and sum-
marizing query results. Information Processing &
Management, 37(6), 789–816. doi:10.1016/S0306-
4573(00)00062-5
Rowley, J. (2004). Online Branding. On-
line Information Review, 28(2), 131–138.
doi:10.1108/14684520410531637
Saeed, K. A., Yujong, H., & Grover, V. (2002).
Investigating the Impact of Web Site Value and
Advertising on Firm Performance in Electronic
Commerce. International Journal of Electronic
Commerce, 7(2), 119–141.
Salazar, A. L., Soto, R. C., & Mosqueda, R. E. (2012).
The impact of financial decisions and strategy on
small business competitiveness [GJBR]. Global
Journal of Business Research, 6(2), 93–103.
Sen, R. (2005). Optimal search engine marketing
strategy. International Journal of Electronic Com-
merce, 10(1), 9–25.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise
of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy
of Management Review, 25, 217–226.
Shim, S., Eastlick, M. A., Lotz, S. L., & Warrington, P.
(2001). An online prepurchase intentions model: The
role of intention to search. Journal of Retailing, 77(3),
397–416. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00051-3
Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User In-
terface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer
Interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Ndofor, H. (2001).
Competitive dynamics research: critique and future
directions. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. R.
Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management
(pp. 315–361). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Spence, L., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small busi-
ness and empirical perspectives in business ethics
[Editorial]. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1–5.
doi:10.1023/A:1026205109290
Steinmetz, L. L. “Critical Stages of Small Business
Growth,” Business Horizons (12:1), 1969, pp. 29-44.
Stevenson, J. S., Bruner, G. C., & Kumar, A. (2000).
Webpage background and viewer attitudes. Journal
of Advertising Research, 40(1/2), 29–34.
Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. 1981. “Schematic Bases
of Social Information Processing,” in Social Cog-
nition: The Ontario Symposium, E. T. Higgins, C.
P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (eds.), Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 89-134.
Trocchia, P. J., & Janda, S. (2003). How do con-
sumers evaluate internet retail service quality?
Journal of Services Marketing, 17(3), 243–253.
doi:10.1108/08876040310474800
Copyright © 2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 13(1), 27-49, January-March 2015 49
Trumbach, C., Payne, D., & Kongthon, A. (2006).
Technology Mining for Small Firms: Knowledge
Prospecting for Competitive Advantage. Technologi-
cal Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 937–949.
doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.018
Ussahawanitchakit, P. (2012). Competitive environ-
ment, organizational innovation and competitive
advantage of electronics businesses in Thailand. In-
ternational Journal of Business Research., 12(2), 1–8.
Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A., & Burnett,
D. (1997). Towards an understanding of ethical be-
haviour in small firms. Journal of Business Ethics,
16(15), 1625–1636. doi:10.1023/A:1022452502299
Westerberg, M., & Wincent, J. (2008). CEO suc-
cession, honing, and enterprising: A promising way
to achieve small business performance? Journal of
International Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 117–112.
Witt, P. (2004). Entrepreneurs, networks and
the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship
and Regional Development, 16(5), 391–412.
doi:10.1080/0898562042000188423
Wolff, J. A., & Pett, T. L. (2000). Internationalization
of small firms: An examination of export competitive
patterns, firm size, and export performance. Journal
of Small Business Management, 38(2), 34–47.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research, Design and
Methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Zhang, J., & Dimitroff, A. (2005). The impact of
metadata implementation on Webpage visibility in
search engine results (Part II). Information Process-
ing & Management, 41(3), 691–715. doi:10.1016/j.
ipm.2003.12.002
Zhenhui, J., Chan, J., Tan, B. Y., & Wei Siong, C.
(2010). Effects of Interactivity on Website Involve-
ment and Purchase Intention. Journal of the Associa-
tion for Information Systems, 11(1), 34–59.
Zhilin, Y., Peterson, R. T., & Cai, S. (2003). Ser-
vices quality dimensions of internet retailing: An
exploratory analysis. Journal of Services Marketing,
17(6/7), 685–698.
Zing, B., & Lin, Z. (2006) The impact of search
engine optimization on online advertising market.
In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference
on Electronic Commerce: The new e-Commerce: In-
novations for conquering current barriers, obstacles
and limitations to conducting successful business on
the Internet (pp. 519-529).
Stella D. Tomasi is an Assistant Professor of e-Business and Technology Management with the
College of Business and Economics of Towson University. She earned her Ph.D. in Manage-
ment Information Systems at Temple University. Dr. Tomasi’s research interests include project
management, information visualization, search engine optimization, supply chain, and teach-
ing pedagogy. Her work has appeared in the International Journal of Project Organisation and
Management, International Journal of Data Analysis and Information Systems, and Journal of
Systems and Information Technology.
Xiaolin Li is an Associate Professor of e-Business and Technology Management with the College
of Business and Economics of Towson University. He received his Ph.D. in Management Systems
from Kent State University. Dr. Li’s current research emphases are the adoption, continuation, and
valuation of technological innovations and buyer-supplier relationships. His research has been
published in Information Systems Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems,
Decision Sciences, International Journal of Production Economics, Journal of Organizational
Computing and Electronic Commerce, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Journal of
Information Systems Education, among others. His research has also won the “Distinguished
Research Paper Award” (in innovative education track) from the Decision Science Institute
40th Annual Conference (2009) and “Honorable Mention Award” from Midwest DSI Annual
Conference (2006). In 2012, Dr. Li won Towson University College of Business and Economics
Outstanding Scholarship Award.