ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate the level of maturity of the concept of health in the nursing discipline.Method The four principles of Morse and colleagues were used to evaluate the level of maturity of the health concept—epistemological, logical, pragmatical, and linguistical.FindingsThis evaluation suggests that the concept of health in nursing is immature, defined inconsistently, and with different instruments.Conclusion Health is a central concept for nursing. Additional concept development and clarification are needed.Practice ImplicationsFor the concept of health to be conceptualized, it is important that nurses have consensus regarding the definition of health. The nursing discipline should define health in a manner that is consistent with its philosophical presuppositions. Further, it should be measurable, empirically based, and capture the outcomes that are sensitive to the nursing interventions.
Health: A Developing Concept in Nursing
Eman Tariq Alslman, RN, MSN, Muayyad M. Ahmad, RN, PhD, Manar Ali Bani Hani, RN, MSN, and
Huda Mohammad Atiyeh, RN, MSN
Eman Tariq Alslman, RN, MSN, is a PhD student at Faculty of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan, Muayyad
M. Ahmad, RN, PhD, is a Professor at Faculty of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan, Manar Ali Bani Hani,
RN, MSN, is a PhD student at Faculty of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan, and Huda Mohammad Atiyeh,
RN, MSN, is a PhD student at Faculty of Nursing, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Search terms:
Concept analysis, health, health
measurement, health status,
nursing
Author contact:
eman.yassen@hotmail.com;
Emanyaseen0@gmail.com, with a
copy to the Editor:
journal@nanda.org
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the level of maturity of the
concept of health in the nursing discipline.
METHOD: The four principles of Morse and colleagues were used to evaluate the
level of maturity of the health concept—epistemological, logical, pragmatical, and
linguistical.
FINDINGS: This evaluation suggests that the concept of health in nursing is
immature, defined inconsistently, and with different instruments.
CONCLUSION: Health is a central concept for nursing. Additional concept devel-
opment and clarification are needed.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: For the concept of health to be conceptualized, it is
important that nurses have consensus regarding the definition of health. The
nursing discipline should define health in a manner that is consistent with its
philosophical presuppositions. Further, it should be measurable, empirically based,
and capture the outcomes that are sensitive to the nursing interventions.
Introduction
Most concepts in nursing are relatively abstract. So the
multiple dimensions and characteristics of these concepts
should be specified and precise in their meanings (Waltz,
Strickland, & Lenz, 2010). Health is one of the central con-
cepts in nursing discipline (Johansson, Weinehall, &
Emmelin, 2009; Reynolds, 1988). It is one of the nursing
metaparadigms and the basic concept in nursing theories
(Lyon, 2012b).
How health is defined or understood is important for
both health professionals and patients to plan healthcare
interventions and health promotion programs. However,
health concept is considered complex and includes multiple
dimensions (Amzat & Razum, 2014). As a complex concept,
it is more difficult to be consistently defined, and its
operationalization becomes more complex (Waltz et al.,
2010). Concepts can be operationalized at a high level of
pragmatic development of the concept. Thus, the concept
should be relatively well developed and uniformly under-
stood in order to be appropriately operationalized (Penrod
& Hupcey, 2005). Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to
evaluate the maturity level of the concept of health in the
nursing discipline.
Definitions of Health
The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) definition of
health is the most commonly used and cited definition in the
literature (Awofeso, 2005; Hwu, Coates, & Boore, 2001;
Johansson et al., 2009). The WHO provides a definition of
health that is holistic: “a state of complete physical, mental,
and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease
and infirmity” (WHO, 1948). The definition includes three
interconnected components of health. First, the physical
component reflects the physiological or biological compo-
nent of the definition. It is used to imply the homoeostasis
maintenance and a soundness of the body. Unhealthy
people can be identified by physical problems that may be
detected by a series of laboratory tests or clinical examina-
tions. Second, the social component represents the behav-
ioral aspect of health. Social health means that a person is
able to participate in the network of social interaction and
fulfill social roles and expectations. Social abnormality can
be determined if the individual is inactive in the social
network and detached from the norms and values of
society. The social component of health also includes the
spiritual dimension. Finally, the mental component indicates
the psychological, emotional, and mental status of the indi-
vidual. Any problem that affects the mental component can
lead to mental illness. Examples of manifestations of mental
illness may include emotional apathy, fixation, and malad-
justed personality (Amzat & Razum, 2014).
On the other hand, medicine has traditionally held the
objective view of health. The biomedical model is the most
popular and widely used view of health in which health is
operationalized as the absence of disease (Lyon, 2012b). In
addition, the most powerful idea is that health is constituted
bs_bs_banner
1© 2015 NANDA International, Inc.
International Journal of Nursing Knowledge Volume ••, No. ••, •• 2015
by physical and mental balance. A person in balance is a
healthy person. That is, the various parts of the human body
and mind and their functions are harmoniously connected
and keep each other in check (Nordenfelt, 2007). Health is
also defined as “a dynamic state of well-being characterized
by a physical and mental potential, which satisfies the
demands of life commensurate with age, culture, and per-
sonal responsibility” (Bircher, 2005, p. 336).
In sociology, health can be defined by different social
groups or by cultural contexts. Also, health is connected
with socioeconomic class (Nettleton, 2006). Health in psy-
chology is not the absence of disease but the physical,
psychological, cultural, economical, and spiritual well-being
(Marks, Evans, & Estacio, 2011).
Health in Nursing Discipline
Prior to 1988, there was little concern about researching
the concept of health in nursing. Health in nursing studies
was most commonly defined as absence of illness, disability,
or symptoms. The multiple dimensions of health, such as
physical, mental, and sociological aspects, were also
ignored (Reynolds, 1988).
In the last several decades, the nursing discipline has
been concerned with the holistic and multidimensional view
of health. In addition, the nature of health is recognized and
accepted to be dynamic and subjective among both
researchers and patients (Hwu et al., 2001). Health profes-
sionals, including nurses, view health as a subjective expe-
rience and multifaceted concept, including physical, mental,
and spiritual dimensions. They also believe that the defini-
tion of health varies according to the individuals, culture,
and context (Johansson et al., 2009). Nurses define health
as absence of disease, living in a good environment, and
social and psychological satisfaction (Shoqirat, 2014).
Examples of definitions of health concept in nursing disci-
pline are included in Table 1.
Methodology
The maturity of a concept means that it should be
“relatively stable and clearly defined, with well-described
characteristics, demarcated boundaries, specified precon-
ditions and outcomes” (Morse, Hupcey, Mitcham, & Lenz,
1996, p. 256). In order to evaluate the maturity level of the
health concept, the four principles of Morse et al. (1996),
epistemological, logical, pragmatical, and linguistical, were
used.
The CINAHL database and Google Scholar were
searched using health, health concept, health status,
concept analysis, health measurement, and nursing key-
words. Searching was limited to full text, English language,
and publication years between 1995 and 2015. If full text
was not available, other databases were searched for the
full-text article. Those databases include Science direct,
SAGE journals, Wiley online library, and Springer. In addi-
tion, related references that were found in the articles were
included. Some nursing articles published before 1995 were
included because they covered valuable information such
as concept analysis, nursing definitions of health, and
instruments used in nursing.
Findings
Epistemological
In this principle, the concept is evaluated by identifying
the clarity and distinction of the definition. Concept should
be defined clearly and differentiated from other concepts
(Penrod & Hupcey, 2005).
In the literature, there was no absolute consensus on
the definitions of health (Amzat & Razum, 2014; Lyon,
2012b). The health concept has a form of vagueness
because it is multidimensional, complex, and sometimes
Table 1. Nursing-Focused Conceptualizations of Health
(Lyon, 2012a)
Author Definition of health
Henderson
(1966)
Health is viewed in terms of a person’s ability
to perform 14 self-care tasks and a quality
of life basic to human functioning.
Peplau (l952,
1988)
Health is defined as forward movement of the
personality that is promoted through
interpersonal processes in the direction of
creative, productive, and constructive
living.
Rogers (1970,
1989)
Health is defined as a value term for which
meaning is determined by culture or the
individual. Positive health symbolizes
wellness.
Orem (1971,
1980, 1995)
Health is defined as a state that is
characterized by soundness or wholeness
of bodily and mental functioning. It includes
physical, psychological, interpersonal, and
social aspects. Well-being is the individual’s
perceived condition of existence.
King (1971, 1981) Health is defined as a dynamic state of the
life cycle; illness is an interference in the
life cycle. Health implies continuous
adaptation to stress.
Neuman (1989) Health is defined as reflected in the level of
wellness.
Parse (1981,
1989)
Health is defined as a lived experience—a
rhythmic process of being and becoming.
Tripp-Reimer
(1984)
Health is defined as encompassing two
dimensions, the etic (objective) and the
emic (subjective), which include both
disease/nondisease and illness/wellness.
Lyon (1990) Health is defined as a person’s subjective
expression of the composite evaluation of
somatic sense of self (how one is feeling)
and functional ability (how one is doing).
The resulting judgment is manifested in the
subjective experience of some degree of
illness or wellness.
Note: Examples of nursing’s definition of health. Adapted from Lyon
(2012b, p. 13) with permission.
Health Concept in Nursing E. T. Alslman et al.
2
intangible (Amzat & Razum, 2014). Health is defined in dif-
ferent ways such as “a value judgment, as an objective
state, as a subjective state, as a continuum from illness to
wellness, and as a utopian state (rarely achievable)” (Lyon,
2012b). Sometimes the definitions contradict each other.
For example, the WHO definition reveals that health is not
merely the absence of disease. In contrast, health is defined
as the absence of disease based on biomedical model of
health (Amzat & Razum, 2014).
Although the WHO’s definition is the most commonly
cited, it has been criticized for many years (Awofeso, 2005;
Huber et al., 2011; Saracci, 1997). The WHO definition is
described as “utopian, inflexible, and unrealistic” (Awofeso,
2005). The word “complete” makes most people, if not all
people, unhealthy most of the time (Awofeso, 2005; Smith,
2008). The definition also makes people with chronic dis-
eases and disabilities unhealthy (Huber et al., 2011).
There is an inconsistency in the definition of health as a
central concept in nursing (Lyon, 2012b). Nursing studies
sometimes used only one dimension, such as physical or
psychological, to define health and others include multiple
dimensions (Hwu et al., 2001). Four concept analyses of
health were found and all were done by nurses (Noughabi,
Alhani, & Piravi, 2013; Sadat Hoseini, Panah, & Alhani, 2014;
Simmons, 1989; Wang, 2005). The concept analysis by
Wang (2005) was in Chinese. Based on the abstract, health
was defined as “a process and outcome that involves sub-
jectivity, individuality, objectivity, culture, dynamics, self-
control, external control, changeability, and development”
(Wang, 2005).
Simmons (1989) identified four themes for health
concept definition. Health was defined as the absence of
disease, as role performance, as adaptation, and as maxi-
mizing human potentials. She also identified two critical
attributes for health. The first is biomedical adaptation,
which includes a dynamic equilibrium among an individual’s
biological, psychological, and sociocultural systems,
“including the capacity to adjust to life events and roles”
(Simmons, 1989, p. 158). The second is self-actualization,
which is defined as the maximizing of the individual’s poten-
tial through goal-directed behavior, reflecting growth, and
reproductive living.
Sadat Hoseini et al. (2014) did a concept analysis of
health based on an Islamic source. Health in Islamic text
viewed as value and includes two main dimensions, physical
and spiritual. Spiritual health is superior over the physical
health and persons can use their intellect to attain spiritual
health. Spiritual health gives the ability to perceive life
events as normal or abnormal.
Noughabi et al. (2013) provided hybrid concept analysis
of health in old people. They concluded that health in old
people includes physical, social, mental, spiritual, familial,
and economical dimensions and the ability to perform
daily life activities that can be measured by medical and
functional approaches. Health in old people is affected
by genetic factors, environment, healthcare services, and
lifestyle.
Logical
In this principle, the concept is evaluated based on its
relation and integration with other concepts. It focuses on
the conceptual boundaries and if the concept overlaps with
other concepts (Penrod & Hupcey, 2005).
Health has many images that reveal the complexity of
the concept. Those images include the opposite of disease,
a balanced state, growth, a functional capacity, goodness of
fit, wholeness, well-being, transcendence, empowerment,
and health as a resource (Arnold & Janssen Breen, 2006).
There are some concepts that contribute to the confu-
sion of health concept such as wellness, well-being, quality
of life (Lyon, 2012b), and happiness (Johansson et al., 2009;
Saracci, 1997). For example, health and wellness are used
interchangeably (Lyon, 2012b); and also the term “well-
being” is used instead of health in some nursing research
(Hwu et al., 2001). Moreover, health professionals describe
that there is a close connection between health, well-being,
and happiness (Johansson et al., 2009). Furthermore,
Saracci (1997) revealed that the term “complete physical,
mental, and social wellbeing” used by the WHO reflects
happiness more than health. That is, any disturbance to
happiness may be construed as a health problem. Other
terminologies that are used interchangeably are health
status, health-related quality of life, functional status, and
frailty (Feeny, Eckstrom, Whitlock, & Perdue, 2013).
Pragmatical
In this principle, the focus is on the applicability and
usefulness of the concept and how it is operationalized
(Penrod & Hupcey, 2005).
How to describe or define health is a central challenge in
deciding on the measurement of health (Chatterji et al.,
2002). The multiple definitions, inconsistency in the defini-
tions, the multidimensionality, and the abstract nature of
the concept are making it difficult, if not impossible, to
clearly operationalize the concept of health (Johansson
et al., 2009; Lyon, 2012b; McDowell, 2006). For instance,
the term complete in the WHO’s definition is not practical
and cannot be measured or operationalized (Jadad &
O’Grady, 2008). The first step to measure health appropri-
ately is to reach an agreement regarding the definition of
health and what is to be measured (McDowell, 2006). There
are many instruments used by clinicians and researchers to
measure health. Nevertheless, consensus has not been
reached regarding which instrument is to be used in
research or clinical settings (Haywood, Garratt, &
Fitzpatrick, 2005). Health is mainly measured by reporting
perceived health because it can examine different dimen-
sions of health. In contrast, objective measures can only
assess one area of health such as level of glucose in blood
(Noughabi et al., 2013).
In nursing research, operational definitions of health were
varied and included one dimension of health (e.g., physical,
psychological or social dimension) or a combination of all
E. T. Alslman et al. Health Concept in Nursing
3
Table 2. Application of Health Concept in Nursing Researches
Author
(year) Title Purpose Target population Conceptual definition of health Operational definition of health
Term used to
reflect health Health dimensions measured
Doumit,
Nasser,
and Hanna
(2014)
Nutritional and health
status among nursing
home residents in
Lebanon: Comparison
across gender in a
national cross sectional
study
Explore the socio-demographic,
health, and nutritional status of
elderly residing in Lebanese
nursing homes (NHs) and
compare these characteristics
across gender.
Elderly people living
in Lebanese NHs
Not explicitly mentioned. Health
was reflected by functional
ability, psychological status, and
social relations.
The Mini Mental State Examination
The Geriatric Depression Rating
Scale
The Activities of Daily Living
Interview (question about
perceived health status and if
they are visiting others or being
visited by others)
Health status Cognitive functioning
(psychological)
Depression (psychological)
Basic functioning tasks (physical)
Perceived health status
Social relations (social)
Leaver
(2014)
Visiting Again? Subjective
well-being of children in
elementary school and
repeated visits to
school health nurses
To compare student reports of
subjective well-being between
children who do and do not
repeatedly visit the school nurse
with vague complaints
Children in grades 4
through 6
School Well-Being Model (school
environment, social
relationships, physical health
status, and means of
self-fulfillment)
School Well-Being Profile (SWBP) Well-being
Health
Health status
Health status (physical)
School environment
(environmental)
Social relationships (social)
School as a means of
self-fulfillment (psychological)
Pawl et al.
(2013)
Sleep loss and its effects
on health of family
caregivers of
individuals with primary
malignant brain tumors
Understanding correlates of sleep
loss and relationships to health
may enable improvement of
health of caregivers of
individuals with primary
malignant brain tumors (PMBTs).
Caregivers of
individuals with
PMBTs
Health is defined as four
dimensions: physical,
cognitive/behavioral, emotional,
and social health.
Serum markers of immune
functioning and the physical
health component of the Medical
Outcomes Study short form
(SF-36)
Fatigue subscale of the SF-36 and
Fox Simple Quality of Life Scale
The Center of Epidemiologic
Studies-Depression scale and
the Functional Assessment of
Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual
Well-Being Scale
The Interpersonal Support
Evaluation List and the Work
Limitations Questionnaire
Health Physical
Cognitive/Behavioral
(psychological)
Emotional (psychological)
Social health
Clendon and
Walker
(2013)
The health of nurses aged
over 50 in New Zealand
Examined the characteristics and
experiences of nurses aged over
50 in New Zealand
Nurses in New
Zealand aged over
50
Not explicitly mentioned. Health
was reflected by the ability of
nurse to do usual activities, the
presence of pain or discomforts,
or presence of anxiety or
depression.
The online EQ5D-3L survey Health status
Health-related
quality of life
Usual activities (physical)
Anxiety and depression
(psychological)
Pain and discomfort (physical)
Hørdam,
Sabroe,
Pedersen,
Mejdahl,
and
Søballe
(2010)
Nursing intervention by
telephone interviews of
patients aged over 65
years after total hip
replacement improves
health status: A
randomized clinical trial
Hypothesized that all areas of
health status after total hip
replacement (THR) could be
improved in patients aged 65
years and over by using
telephone support and
counseling
Patients aged over
65 years admitted
to elective THR
Patient’s normal activities in
relation to health issues and
activities of daily living:
well-being, expectations as to
physical function (PF) after
surgery and compared with
those before surgery, physical
symptoms, eating and appetite,
fluid intake, ability to follow
prescribed activity and exercise,
and need of support from family
SF-36 Health
Health status
Dysfunctions and general health
perceptions (physical,
psychological, and social)
Health Concept in Nursing E. T. Alslman et al.
4
dimensions. On the other hand, the spiritual dimension of
health was ignored because it is difficult to measure. Never-
theless, the majority of the health measures used in nursing
were multidimensional. Health concept was measured based
on variety of populations such as adults, adolescents, older
people, families, men, women, caregiver–recipient dyad,
communities, and children. Health was mainly measured
using self-report indicators and self-measurement instru-
ments, and some scales were specific for particular popula-
tions or groups (Hwu et al., 2001); for example, the General
Health Rating Index for children (Post, Kuyvenhoven,
Verheij, de Melker, & Hoes, 1998) and the Duke Older Ameri-
cans Resources and Services Questionnaire (OARS) for older
adults (Fillenbaum, 1988).
In the past, nursing researchers ignored the reliability
and validity of measures that assessed participants’ health
(Reynolds, 1988). The focus on the reliability and validity of
the instruments increased and they became more sophisti-
cated in the last years. Construct validity was the most
widely used method of validity. Factor analysis, convergent
validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity were
used. Also, the repeated use of well-established instru-
ments enhanced the validity of the instrument by testing
their application in various settings (Hwu et al., 2001).
Examples of well-established and most widely used
instruments in nursing research include (Hwu et al., 2001):
the Health Perception Questionnaire (Ware, 1976) and its
derivative the General Health Rating Index, Laffrey’s Health
Conception Scale (Laffrey, 1986), and Duke-UNC Health
Profile (Parkerson et al., 1981). However, there are inconsis-
tencies in the operational definitions or tools used in
nursing studies. In addition, more than one instrument is
mainly used in the same nursing study to measure health
(Doumit, Nasser, & Hanna, 2014; Pawl, Lee, Clark, &
Sherwood, 2013). Examples of applications and instruments
used in nursing research are included in Table 2.
Linguistical
In this principle, concept is evaluated if it is appropriately
and consistently used in the context (Penrod & Hupcey,
2005).
Nursing uses the concept of health in the literature to
reflect the perceived health status of the clients (e.g.,
nurses, persons, and patients). It is applied in different con-
texts and in individuals, families, and communities. In addi-
tion, health-related concepts are widely used in nursing
literature. For example, health promotion, health beliefs,
health needs, health care, and health education, etc.
Based on the four criteria mentioned above, health
concept is still immature in both interdisciplinary and
intradisciplinary features.
Discussion
Although there is a large body of literature that
addresses the concept of health, there is no consistency in
the definition and operationalization of health. Health
concept was evaluated based on Morse et al.’s (1996) prin-
ciples of level of maturity of the concept. There was con-
sistency in describing the health concept as dynamic and
subjective and varies according to the context, individuals,
and cultures (Hwu et al., 2001; Johansson et al., 2009; Lyon,
2012b). Nevertheless, health concept was defined using dif-
ferent terminology and definitions. For example, health was
defined as objective state, subjective state, and value (Lyon,
2012b). Health concept is considered as multidimensional,
complex, and difficult to be measured. It was measured
using different instruments based on the population,
context, and the purpose. Therefore, further concept devel-
opment and clarification are needed. Nurses and other
health professionals should work on the definition of health
concept and reach global consistency regarding the con-
ceptualization and operationalization of health. Nurses
should reach consensus regarding the definition of health in
order to be appropriately operationalized. Health in nursing
discipline must be defined in a manner that is consistent
with its philosophical presuppositions, should be measur-
able, empirically based, and capture outcomes that are sen-
sitive to nursing interventions (Lyon, 2012b).
Conclusion
Although health is a central concept in nursing, health is
defined inconsistently in nursing and other disciplines. Addi-
tional concept development and clarification is needed.
Health should be defined in a consistent manner in order to
help nurses and other healthcare professionals provide
healthcare services and interventions. How health is
defined can help the nurse with assessing the patient’s
health and identifying health problems and patient’s needs.
In addition, the nurse will be able to develop nursing diag-
nosis that provides the basis for nursing intervention to
achieve health outcome.
Acknowledgments. This paper was partially funded by the
University of Jordan.
References
Amzat, J., & Razum, O. (2014). Health, disease, and illness as conceptual
tools. In J. Amzat & O. Razum (Eds.), Medical sociology in Africa
(pp. 21–38). Switzarland: Springer International Publishing.
Arnold, J., & Janssen Breen, L. (2006). Images of health. In S. Sheinfeld Gorin
& J. Arnold (Eds.), Health promotion in practice (pp. 3–30). San Francisco:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Awofeso, N. (2005). Re-defining “Health.” Retrieved from http://www.who
.int/bulletin/bulletin_board/83/ustun11051/en/
Bircher, J. (2005). Towards a dynamic definition of health and disease.
Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy,8(3), 335–341. doi:10.1007/s11019-
005-0538-y
Chatterji, S., Ustün, B. L., Sadana, R., Salomon, J. A., Mathers, C. D., & Murray,
C. J. (2002). The conceptual basis for measuring and reporting on health.
Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper, 45.
Clendon, J., & Walker, L. (2013). The health of nurses aged over 50 in New
Zealand. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Pro-
fession,45(1), 85–94. doi:10.5172/conu.2013.45.1.85
Doumit, J. H., Nasser, R. N., & Hanna, D. R. (2014). Nutritional and health
status among nursing home residents in Lebanon: Comparison across
E. T. Alslman et al. Health Concept in Nursing
5
gender in a national cross sectional study. BMC Public Health,14(1),
1281–1298. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-629
Feeny, D. H., Eckstrom, E., Whitlock, E. P., & Perdue, L. A. (2013). A primer for
systematic reviewers on the measurement of functional status and
health-related quality of life in older adults.
Fillenbaum, G. G. (1988). Multidimensional functional assessment of older
adults: The Duke older Americans resources and services procedures.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Quality of life in older
people: A structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments.
Quality of Life Research,14(7), 1651–1668. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-1743-0
Hørdam, B., Sabroe, S., Pedersen, P. U., Mejdahl, S., & Søballe, K. (2010).
Nursing intervention by telephone interviews of patients aged over 65
years after total hip replacement improves health status: A randomised
clinical trial. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,24(1), 94–100.
doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00691.x
Huber, M., Knottnerus, J. A., Green, L., van der Horst, H., Jadad, A. R.,
Kromhout, D., & van der Meer, J. W. (2011). How should we define health?
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.),343, d4163.
Hwu, Y.-J., Coates, V. E., & Boore, J. R. (2001). The evolving concept of health
in nursing research: 1988–1998. Patient Education and Counseling,42(2),
105–114.
Jadad, A. R., & O’Grady, L. (2008). How should health be defined? British
Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.),337, a2900.
Johansson, H., Weinehall, L., & Emmelin, M. (2009). “It depends on what you
mean”: A qualitative study of Swedish health professionals’ views on
health and health promotion. BMC Health Services Research,9, 191.
doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-191
Laffrey, S. C. (1986). Development of a health conception scale. Research in
Nursing & Health,9(2), 107–113. doi:10.1002/nur.4770090205
Leaver, C. A. (2014). Visiting again? Subjective well-being of children in
elementary school and repeated visits to school health nurses. Journal of
School Health,84(5), 294–301. doi:10.1111/josh.12150
Lyon, B. L. (2012a). Nursing-focused conceptualizations of health. In V. H.
Rice (Ed.), Handbook of stress, coping, and health: Implications for
nursing research, theory, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Lyon, B. L. (2012b). Stress, coping, and health: A conceptual overview. In V. H.
Rice (Ed.), Handbook of stress, coping, and health: Implications for
nursing research, theory, and practice (pp. 2–20). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Marks, D. F., Evans, B., & Estacio, E. V. (2011). Health psychology: Theory,
research and practice. London: Sage Publications.
McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and question-
naires. New York: Oxford University Press.
Morse, J. M., Hupcey, J. E., Mitcham, C., & Lenz, E. R. (1996). Concept analysis
in nursing research: A critical appraisal. Research and Theory for Nursing
Practice,10(3), 253–277.
Nettleton, S. (2006). The sociology of health and illness. Cambridge: Polity
Press.
Nordenfelt, L. (2007). Understanding the concept of health. In P. Nilsen (Ed.),
Strategies for health: An anthology (pp. 4–15). Linköping, Sweden:
Linköping University.
Noughabi, A. A., Alhani, F., & Piravi, H. (2013). Health hybrid concept analysis
in old people. Global Journal of Health Science,5(6), 227–232.
Parkerson, G. R., Jr., Gehlbach, S. H., Wagner, E. H., James, S. A., Clapp, N. E.,
& Muhlbaier, L. H. (1981). The Duke-UNC health profile: An adult health
status instrument for primary care. Medical Care,19(8), 806–828.
doi:10.2307/3764242
Pawl, J. D., Lee, S.-Y., Clark, P. C., & Sherwood, P. R. (2013). Sleep loss and its
effects on health of family caregivers of individuals with primary malig-
nant brain tumors. Research in Nursing & Health,36(4), 386–399.
doi:10.1002/nur.21545
Penrod, J., & Hupcey, J. E. (2005). Enhancing methodological clarity:
Principle-based concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing,50(4),
403–409.
Post, M., Kuyvenhoven, M., Verheij, M., de Melker, R., & Hoes, A. (1998). The
Dutch ‘Rand General Health Rating Index for Children’: A questionnaire
measuring the general health status of children]. Nederlands Tijdschrift
Voor Geneeskunde,142(49), 2680–2683.
Reynolds, C. L. (1988). The measurement of health in nursing research.
Advances in Nursing Science,10(4), 23–31.
Sadat Hoseini, A. S., Panah, A. K., & Alhani, F. (2014). The concept analysis of
health based on Islamic sources: Intellectual health. International Journal
of Nursing Knowledge,26(3), 113–120. doi:10.1111/2047-3095.12052
Saracci, R. (1997). The World Health Organization needs to reconsider its
definition of health. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.),
314(7091), 1409.
Shoqirat, N. (2014). What is being promoted? Hospital nurse knowledge of
health in Jordan. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge,25(1), 9–13.
doi:10.1111/2047-3095.12009
Simmons, S. J. (1989). Health: A concept analysis. International Journal of
Nursing Studies,26(2), 155–161.
Smith, R. (2008). The end of disease and the beginning of health. BMJ Groups
Blogs. Retrieved from http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2008/07/08/richard-
smith-the-end-of-disease-and-the-beginning-of-health/
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O., & Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and
health research (4th ed.). New York: Springer.
Wang, Y. (2005). A concept analysis of health]. Hu Li Za Zhi the Journal of
Nursing,52(1), 40–43.
Ware, J. E., Jr. (1976). Scales for measuring general health perceptions.
Health Services Research,11(4), 396–415.
World Health Organization. (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the
World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Con-
ference. New York, June 19–22, 1946, and entered into force on April 7,
1948.
Health Concept in Nursing E. T. Alslman et al.
6
... This is a global benchmark target aiming to end AIDS. As a result, WHO (2015) came up with a recommendation of fast tracking these targets by introducing Test and Start initiative [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. ...
... This explains the fact that most participants who never attended training on Test and Start had negative attitudes towards the Test and Start Initiative. Consistent with this study, [3] indicated that training improved the attitudes of nurses, however not reaching the desired level. It was reported that a significantly high proportion of trained nurses would refuse to provide HIV services. ...
... Unfortunately, we did not have exact number of cardiac arrest in Jordan, approximately 300,000 out-of hospital cardiac arrests were reported each year in the United States (AHA, 2010). There is only a 10% survival rate after CPR because of the poor quality of performance by the public and health care providers (Eman, et al. 2015;Alspach, 2005;Abella, et al. 2005). Studies have documented that the quality of CPR performance by nurses and nursing students is poor due to ineffective initial training which lead to poor retention of CPR knowledge and skills (Abella, et al. 2005; . ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of using simulators on the level of cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and skills acquisition and retention compared with traditional training for nursing students. Methods: Pretest posttest method was used. A test of multiple choice questions and checklist format was used in three phases: baseline, acquisition, and retention phases. Results: The results showed significant differences between the participants of the high fidelity simulators training group and the participants of the traditional static manikin training group on the acquisition of cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and skills. The participants in both groups showed a decrease in their cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and skills after three months of training. However, the retention scores of cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and skills for the participants in the high fidelity simulators group was decreased after three months, still significantly higher than the static manikin training group. Conclusion: This study may assist nursing educators in incorporating the use of high fidelity simulators in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.
... Unfortunately, we did not have exact number of cardiac arrest in Jordan, approximately 300,000 out-of hospital cardiac arrests were reported each year in the United States (AHA, 2010). There is only a 10% survival rate after CPR because of the poor quality of performance by the public and health care providers (Eman, et al. 2015;Alspach, 2005;Abella, et al. 2005). Studies have documented that the quality of CPR performance by nurses and nursing students is poor due to ineffective initial training which lead to poor retention of CPR knowledge and skills (Abella, et al. 2005; . ...
Article
Full-text available
The rationale of our study was that the World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of health from 1947 which includes “… complete physical, mental and social wellbeing…” does not fit the current societal viewpoints anymore. The WHO’s definition of health implies that many people with chronic illnesses or disabilities would be considered unhealthy and complete wellbeing would be utopian and unfeasible for them. This is no longer uniformly accepted. Many alternative concepts of health have been discussed in the last decades such as ‘positive health’, which focusses on someone’s capability rather than incapability,. However, the question remains whether a general health concept can guide all healthcare practices. More likely, health concepts need to be specified for professions or settings. The objective of our study was to create a structured overview of published concepts of health from different perspectives by conducting a scoping review using the PRISMA-ScR guideline. A literature search was conducted in Pubmed and Cinahl. Articles eligible for inclusion focussed on the discussion or the conceptualisation of health or health-related concepts in different contexts (such as the perspective of care workers’ or patients’) published since 2009 (the Dutch Health Council raised the discussion about moving towards a more dynamic perspective on health in that year). Seventy-five articles could be included for thematic analyses. The results showed that most articles described a concept of health consisting of multiple subthemes; no consensus was found on one overall concept of health. This implies that healthcare consumers act based on different health concepts when seeking care than care workers when providing care. Having different understandings of the concepts of health can lead to misunderstandings in practice. In conclusion, from every perspective, and even for every individual, health may mean something different. This finding stresses the importance that care workers’ and healthcare consumers’ meaning of ‘health’ has to be clear to all actors involved. Our review supports a more uniform tuning of healthcare between healthcare providers (the organisations), care workers (the professionals) and healthcare consumers (the patients), by creating more awareness of the differences among these actors, which can be a guide in their communication.
Article
Stroke family caregivers often neglect their own health while providing care. Rigorous reviews have focused on stroke caregiver needs and outcomes; however, a comprehensive review of stroke caregiver health is lacking. The purpose of this integrative review was to determine factors associated with stroke family caregiver health. Using a PRISMA flow diagram and Rayyan software, 41 studies were identified published from January 2000 to December 2020. Databases included Cochrane Reviews, Cochrane Trials, PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EBSCOhost MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Rigorous guidelines were used to critique the 41 articles. Health measures were global in nature, lacking details regarding health promotion activities important to stroke family caregiver health. Common factors associated with caregiver health were depressive symptoms and burden. Further research is needed to design more situation-specific instruments to measure stroke family caregiver health, as well as interventions to reduce depressive symptoms and burden while promoting caregiver health.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Muayyad M. Ahmad, PhD, RN, is a professor in the Clinical Nursing Department at the University of Jordan with research interest in quality of nursing care, psychometric properties of instruments, and psychosocial care of cancer patients. Around 50 publications in International Journals. PhD from Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 2000, MSc and BSc from the University of Jordan, 1992 & 1986. mma4@ju.edu.jo & mma4jo@yahoo.com.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: This study was designed to examine the predictive power of parenting stress and certain aspects of fathers’ and their children’s with autism characteristics for fathers’ quality of life (QoL). Methods: Cross-sectional data collected from 101 fathers through self-administered questionnaires were utilized. Standard simultaneous regression was used for modeling the relationship between QoL as a dependent variable and seven independent variables (parental distress; parent-child dysfunctional interaction; difficult child characteristics; fathers’ level of education, family income, and child’s gender and age). Results: Family income, child’s age, and parent-child dysfunctional interaction were not significant predictors for the QoL of fathers of children with autism. However, the remainder of the variables have added significantly to the explained variance of QoL. Conclusion: The current research-based data can contribute to a better understanding of several variables found predictive for the QoL of fathers raising children with autism. This study may drive health policy makers to design support programs that consider fathers’ psychological health and socioeconomic backgrounds that can directly or indirectly influence the outcomes of their parenting experience.
Article
Full-text available
PurposeThis study describes the concept of health through an analysis of Islamic sources.Method The concept analysis method of Walker and Avant was used.FindingsThe concept of health includes body and spiritual dimensions. Humans have the authority and insight to attain spiritual health, allowing intellectual dominance of the spirit over the body.Conclusion Health and illness are different stages of life, and illness is an opportunity for spiritual growth. It means that events can be used intellectually to gain greater spiritual growth.Practical ImplicationsThis approach may eliminate the concept of adaptation in nursing. Nurses can aspire to human excellence if they consider illness as a normal event, not an abnormal event to which the patient must adapt.
Article
Full-text available
Background This study described the differences between elderly men and women living in Lebanese long-term care nursing homes on socio-economic, health and nutritional status. Methods This study used a cross-sectional design. Field researchers obtained data from 221 residents; 148 (67%) women and 73 (33%) men, living in 36 nursing homes. Data on health conditions; nutritional, psychological, and functional status; socio-demographic characteristics, as well as social relations were collected. The analysis used both chi-square and t-test tests. Results The majority of elderly had low socio-economic and poor health status. In comparison to men, women were significantly less educated, had lower occupational status, had no partner, relied financially on their children and relatives, and enjoyed better social relations and health behaviours. Furthermore, the prevalence of both; malnutrition, and at risk of malnutrition, were at 3.2% and 27.6% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between women and men on Mini Nutritional Assessment, Activities of Daily Living, Geriatric Depression Scale, Body Mass Index, and chronic diseases. While women reported “good” health status compared to men, they continued to have higher prevalence of diseases and chronic pain. Conclusions This study explored the socio-demographic, health, and nutritional status of elderly residing in Lebanese nursing homes and compared these characteristics across gender. The results indicated the need of health support and institutional interventions for elderly women residents.
Chapter
There is no absolute consensus on the definitions of health, disease, and illness, even though these concepts are central not only in medicine but also in the health social sciences. A definition of each of the concepts is imperative because they constitute part of the analytical tools in medical sociology. This chapter presents definitions of these concepts, noting that each of them is multidimensional, complex, and sometimes elusive. The WHO’s definition of health is critically examined with respects to its components, criticisms, and alternative definitions of health. This chapter proceeds to discuss the features of a disease and the specific realities of illness by showing the difference between the two concepts. Disease and illness categories (acute, chronic, accidents/injuries, and mental disease/illness) are discussed. The chapter concludes with a strong emphasis on the cultural beliefs regarding illness causation among lay populations, especially in the African context. The natural, supernatural, mystical, and hereditary/genetic causations are discussed based on cultural realities but are sometimes divergent from biomedical models of disease causation.
Article
This article reports on the construction and testing of eight health perception scales from 32 items on a standardized survey instrument designed for self-administration, the Health Perceptions Questionnaire (Form II). The scales measure perceptions of prior health, current health, health outlook, resistance/susceptibility to illness, health worry/concern, sickness orientation, rejection of sick role, and attitude toward going to the doctor. Field testing revealed that the scales are valid, reliable, and stable over time for diverse populations. It is recommended that the scales be used in studies requiring general health measures. Suggestions for future research are offered.
Article
One effect of rising health care costs has been to raise the profile of studies that evaluate care and create a systematic evidence base for therapies and, by extension, for health policies. All clinical trials and evaluative studies require instruments to monitor the outcomes of care in terms of quality of life, disability, pain, mental health, or general well-being. Many measurement tools have been developed, and choosing among them is difficult. This book provides comparative reviews of the quality of leading health measurement instruments and a technical and historical introduction to the field of health measurement, and discusses future directions in the field. This edition reviews over 100 scales, presented in chapters covering physical disability, psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, mental status testing, social health, pain measurement, and quality of life. An introductory chapter describes the theoretical and methodological development of health measures, while a final chapter reviews the current status of the field, indicating areas in which further development is required. Each chapter includes a tabular comparison of the quality of the instruments reviewed, followed by a detailed description of each instrument, covering its purpose and conceptual basis, its reliability and validity, alternative versions and, where possible, a copy of the scale itself. To ensure accuracy, each review has been approved by the original author of each instrument or by an acknowledged expert.
Article
Editor,--The problem with interpreting both the Family Heart Study Group's report of its one year trial1 and the result of the less interventionist OXCHECK study2 is that both studies tripped at the second hurdle for any clinical trial: after randomisation they failed to “screen” their controls in exactly the same way as they screened the intervention group. The Family Heart Study Group devotes much discussion to the ifs and buts of what the control results might have been and halve the observed reduction in coronary risk score to compensate. In the OXCHECK study, the figure seems to indicate, half the intervention group was compared with itself (previously measured at baseline) and half with people who were screened for the first time in year 3--not the tidiest design and confounded by remeasurement bias. These labour saving designs were no doubt adopted because of restricted funds. The other problem with design was that these subjects were all at generally lower risk of coronary events than the nation as a whole. Over a quarter of the people in the OXCHECK study were in social classes I and II, and, though socioeconomic class was not reported in the family heart study, the towns included in that study were not big urban centres; in both studies initial smoking rates (20-29%) were much lower than those nationally. The subtitle to Nigel Stott's editorial summarises these results as “blanket health promotion a waste of resources.” 3 We should, however, go back to the scientific questions asked by each trial. The first question was, is reversal of risk factors (as a surrogate for primary prevention of coronary and stroke events) possible in primary care settings as a population and high risk approach? Only second came the question, are the methods used feasible and cost effective? From both studies the answer to the first question is a qualified yes; the challenge is to refine methods to improve the second answer. For those of us working with people at higher risk and from mixed ethnic groups a fall in coronary risk of 12-16%, particularly the blood pressure benefit, would be welcome. Pilot work for preventive trials in such settings are in progress.4 The editorial also minimises both trials' positive results. A reduction in smoking is better achieved in other ways, not least by a national ban on tobacco advertising. The probable 3 mm Hg fall in systolic blood pressure would be a major achievement in slowing the rise in blood pressure with age and hence in primary prevention of hypertension and is a vital part of the population prevention strategy. All these methods in primary care need improved precision, to which the trials contribute. Government initiatives are at least trying to produce a change in medical attitudes towards prevention, which then reach out into the population through the people who are opportunistically screened and their families. Time is required. To recommend a return to just a high risk approach is premature and not justified by the published results.
Article
Contemporary philosophy of health has been quite focused on the problem of determining the nature of the concepts of health, illness and disease from a scientific point of view. Some theorists claim and argue that these concepts are value-free and descriptive in the same sense as the concepts of atom, metal and rain are value-free and descriptive. To say that a person has a certain disease or that he or she is unhealthy is thus to objectively describe this person. On the other hand it certainly does not preclude an additional evaluation of the state of affairs as undesirable or bad. The basic scientific description and the evaluation are, however, two independent matters, according to this kind of theory. Other philosophers claim that the concept of health, together with the other medical concepts, is essentially value-laden. To establish that a person is healthy does not just entail some objective inspection and measurement. It presupposes also an evaluation of the general state of the person. A statement that he or she is healthy does not merely imply certain scientific facts regarding the person's body or mind but implies also a (positive) evaluation of the person's bodily and mental state. My task in this paper will be, first, to present a number of prevalent ideas about health and illness, and second, to scrutinize the two principal rival types of theories, the biostatistical and the holistic ones, and present what I take to be the main kind of reasoning by which we could assess these theories.
Article
In 1941 Henry Sigerist, analysing the relevance of health for human welfare, stated that "A healthy individual is a man who is well balanced bodily and mentally, and well adjusted to his physical and social environment. He is in full control of his physical and mental faculties, can adapt to environmental changes, so long as they do not exceed normal limits, and contributes to the welfare of society according to his ability. Health therefore is not simply the absence of disease; it is something positive, a joyful attitude towards life, and a cheerful acceptance of the responsibilities that life puts upon the individual." (1) This was endorsed by the President of the First World Health Assembly of WHO, Dr Andrija Stampar from the School of Public Health in Zagreb, who played a crucial role in drafting the definition of health that was to be incorporated into the first paragraph of the preamble to the WHO Constitution and subsequently into the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Thus, the founders of the World Health Organization defined health as "a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity". The introductory sentence preceding the above definition in the constitution stated "…the following principles are basic to the happiness, harmonious relations and security of all peoples". The constitution further went on to say "The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security…" (2).
Article
BACKGROUND Children with vague complaints are without chronic illness, and who repeatedly visit the school nurse may be at risk for limited academic success. This study compares student reports of subjective well-being between children who do and do not repeatedly visit the school nurse with vague complaints.METHODS Children in grades 4 through 6 completed the School Well-Being Profile-American English (SWBP-AE), a questionnaire with 4 well-being subscales: health status, school environment, social relationships, and school as a means of self-fulfillment. School nurses extracted data on clinic visits from clinic records. Logistic regression explored associations between well-being subscales and repeated visits to the school nurse.RESULTSOf the 320 students participating in the study, 33 (12.04%) students made repeated visits to the school nurse. Perception of health status (OR = 2.072; 95% CI = 1.037, 4.163) was the only significant (p < .05) predictor of repeated visits to the nurse.CONCLUSION Children with poor perception of their health status are more likely to repeatedly visit the school nurse. Children's perceptions of their school environment, social relationships, or school as a means of self-fulfillment are not statistically significant predictors of repeated visits to the school nurse.