ArticlePDF Available

First record of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) from Indian waters

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, is a common coastal shark in the regions of the world where it occurs. Here, the first documented record of the sandbar shark is reported from north-western Indian waters, off the coast of Gujarat. Two specimens, one male and one female, were recorded and landed by a trawl vessel in Porbandar on 23 October 2014, measuring 610 and 760 mm in total length, respectively. This occurrence represents the first confirmed record of C. plumbeus in both western and eastern Indian waters.
Content may be subject to copyright.
First record of the sandbar shark,
Carcharhinus plumbeus, (Chondrichthyes:
Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae)
from Indian waters
dipani sutaria
1
, aashi parikh
2
, alissa barnes
3
and rima w. jabado
4
1
James Cook University, Townsville, 4810, Queensland, Australia,
2
St Xaviers College, Ahmedabad, 382421, Gujarat, India,
3
A.V.C.
College, Tamil Nadu, 609305, India,
4
Gulf Elasmo Project, P.O. Box 29588, Dubai, UAE
The sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, is a common coastal shark in the regions of the world where it occurs. Here, the
first documented record of the sandbar shark is reported from north-western Indian waters, off the coast of Gujarat. Two
specimens, one male and one female, were recorded and landed by a trawl vessel in Porbandar on 23 October 2014, measuring
610 and 760 mm in total length, respectively. This occurrence represents the first confirmed record of C. plumbeus in both
western and eastern Indian waters.
Keywords: sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, new record, Gujarat, India, elasmobranchs
Submitted 3 May 2015; accepted 23 July 2015
INTRODUCTION
The family Carcharhinidae comprises at least 56 described
species (Ebert et al., 2013), of which 26 have been confirmed
from Indian waters (Akhilesh et al., 2014). The sandbar
shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827), is a wide-
ranging large coastal shark found in warm and temperate
seas and inhabiting continental and insular shelves, as well
as deep waters adjacent to them (Compagno, 1984). The
sandbar shark is usually common in the areas where it
occurs (McElroy et al.,2006; Ellis & Musick, 2007), often
found in coastal waters, and utilizing bays, estuaries and
shallow near-shore habitats as nursery areas during the first
few years of its life (Compagno, 1984; National Marine
Fisheries Service, 1991). Some populations of sandbar sharks
across the world have shown significant declines due to
fishing pressures and their conservative life history traits
(slow growth, late maturity and low fecundity) (Musick
et al.,2009). Therefore, this species is categorized as
Vulnerable globally based on the IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species criteria (Musick et al.,2009).
Recent studies investigating shark diversity in the Arabian
Sea and adjacent waters have confirmed the occurrence of C.
plumbeus from the Red Sea, northern Arabian Sea, Gulf of
Oman and Arabian/Persian Gulf (Henderson et al.,2008;
Jabado et al.,2014b, 2015; Spaet & Berumen, 2015).
Records from the Saudi Arabian Red Sea coast indicate
that this species is landed but represents less than 1% of
sampled landings (Spaet & Berumen, 2015). Market surveys
along the coast of Oman only documented a 940 mm imma-
ture female from Dibba in early winter (Henderson et al.,
2008). Furthermore, a longlining project captured a pregnant
female measuring 2020 mm in total length (TL) and a mature
male of 1730 mm TL in Muscat at a depth of 120 m in late
spring (Henderson et al.,2008). Intensive landing site
surveys in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) only recorded
13 C. plumbeus (Jabado et al.,2014b) while fishery independ-
ent surveys captured one female measuring 1800 mm TL
along the coast of Dubai at a depth of 20 m (Jabado, unpub-
lished data). Data from the trade in shark species undertaken
through the UAE indicates that over 3% of species traded
originate from C. plumbeus captured in Arabian Seas and
Gulf of Oman waters (Jabado et al.,2015). Although the
abundance of sandbar sharks in these waters seems to be
relatively low compared to other species, specimens of
various life history stages are reported throughout the year
from the region.
Only one reference to the occurrence of C. plumbeus in
Indian waters exists in the published literature on Indian elas-
mobranchs, with the authors suggesting it appears in pelagic
shark catches of tuna longline vessels in offshore waters of
the Arabian Sea, but with no further details provided (Pillai
& Parakkal, 2000). Yet, in a recent comprehensive review of
chondrichthyan diversity in Indian waters, this species was
not reported (Akhilesh et al., 2014). Here, we present the
first evidence of the occurrence of C. plumbeus off western
India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
On 23 October 2014, two sandbar sharks, Carcharhinus plum-
beus, were landed at the fishing port of Porbander in Gujarat,
Corresponding author:
R.W. Jabado
Email: rimajabado@hotmail.com
1
Marine Biodiversity Records, page 1 of 3. #Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2015
doi:10.1017/S1755267215001025; Vol. 8; e126; 2015 Published online
India (Figure 1). The specimens were caught by a trawl vessel
that was out fishing for two weeks, initially operating within a
40 m depth while traveling north, and then in deeper waters
west of Dwarka and Jakhau at depths of 80 100 m. The TL
(mm) was measured to the nearest centimetre using a measur-
ing tape along the stretched body of the specimen (Compagno,
1984). Sex was determined by the presence or absence of clas-
pers, but no observations were made of the internal organs.
Weight was recorded using a circular spring balance.
RESULTS
The identification of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plum-
beus, was based on the typical diagnostic features of this
species as described by Compagno (1984)(Figure 2).
Two specimens, one male and one female, were recorded
and measured 610 and 760 mm TL, respectively. The male
specimen had partially developed claspers. Although it was
not possible to weigh the male specimen, the female
weighed approximately 2 kg.
DISCUSSION
This record of Carcharhinus plumbeus, the first from Indian
waters and specifically from the western Indian coast, is
important in understanding the wide geographic range of
this species. It brings the total number of shark species
known from Indian waters to 75 and the chondrichthyan
species to 156. Records of C. plumbeus from the northern
Indian Ocean exist primarily from the Red Sea, the
Arabian Gulf and the Arabian Sea (Henderson et al.,2008;
Jabado et al.,2014b,2015; Spaet & Berumen, 2015) and
indicate that this species is either not abundant in this
region or has limited interactions with regional fisheries.
The latter is unlikely due to the nature of fisheries in the
region, which are multi-species and multi-gear (Balan
et al., 1987; Jabado et al.,2014a). However, it indicates
that this species is wide-ranging and that, given the
limited capacity in shark identification in the northern
Arabian Sea area, it may have been previously landed but
misidentified or has gone unreported.
The small size of the two specimens reported here, as well
as the non-calcified claspers of the male record, confirms that
they were juveniles. In fact, although biological traits of
various shark species can vary considerably between different
regions of the world (Compagno et al.,2005), C. plumbeus
males and females reach maturity at lengths varying
between 1080 and 1830, and 1085 and 1490 mm TL, respect-
ively (Stevens & McLoughlin, 1991; Hazin et al.,2007; White,
2007). Although information on the exact capture location of
these specimens could not be recorded, many of the trawlers
off Porbander fish north, west and north-west of Porbandar
in waters ranging from 20 to 180 m (Sutaria, unpublished
data), reinforcing some of the previous studies on this
species that indicate it is generally a demersal species
(McElroy et al.,2006; Ellis & Musick, 2007).
While this record provides additional information on the
occurrence and distribution of the sandbar shark in this
region, more data is required to fully understand its ecology
and distribution. Furthermore, it reflects the limited knowl-
edge of elasmobranchs in the region. In fact, with new elasmo-
branch records frequently reported from Indian waters (Babu
et al.,2011; Kumar et al.,2012,2013; Bineesh et al.,2014; Sen
et al.,2014), more research on the diversity of these species in
this region is warranted.
Fig. 1. Map of the region with an inset depicting the location where the Carcharhinus plumbeus specimens were landed.
Fig. 2. Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827), female, lateral view, 760 mm TL.
2 dipani sutaria et al.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank the fishermen in Porbander for allow-
ing us to collect information from the specimen and for sup-
porting our research in the area. The Save Our Seas
Foundation provided financial support for these surveys
through a grant to Dipani Sutaria.
REFERENCES
Akhilesh K.V., Bineesh K.K., Gopalakrishnan A., Jena J.K., Basheer
V.S. and Pillai N.G.K. (2014) Checklist of chondrichthyans in
Indian waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India
56, 109– 120.
Babu C., Ramachandran S. and Varghese B.C. (2011) On a new record
of sixgill sting ray Hexatrygon bickelli (Heemstra and Smith, 1980)
from south-west coast of India. Indian Journal of Fisheries 58,
137– 139.
Balan K., Sivaraman P., George K.P. and Ramachandran M. (1987)
Appraisal of the marine fisheries of Gujarat. CMFRI Special
Publication, no. 38, pp. 151.
Bineesh K.K., Akhilesh K.V., Sajeela K.A., Abdussamad E.M.,
Gopalakrishnan A., Basheer V.S. and Jena J.K. (2014) DNA barcod-
ing confirms the occurrence of rare elasmobranchs in the Arabian
Sea of Indian EEZ. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 19,
12661271.
Compagno L.J.V. (1984) Sharks of the world: An annotated and illustrated
catalogue of shark species known to date, Vol. 4, Part 1, Hexanchiformes
to Lamniformes. Rome: FAO Fish Synopsis.
Ebert D.A., Fowler S. and Dando M. (2013) Sharks of the world: a fully
illustrated guide. Plymouth, UK: Wild Nature Press, 528 pp.
Ellis J.K. and Musick J.A. (2007) Ontogenetic changes in the diet of the
sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, lower Chesapeake Bay and
Virginia (USA) coastal waters. Environmental Biology of Fishes 80,
5167.
Hazin F.H.V., Oliveira P.G.V. and Macena B.C.L. (2007) Aspects of the
reproductive of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo,
1827), in coastal waters off Pernambuco, Brazil. Collective Volume of
Scientific Papers, ICCAT 60, 629635.
Henderson A.C., Al-Oufi H. and McIlwain J.L. (2008) Survey, status and
utilization of the elasmobranch fisheries resources of the Sultanate of
Oman. Muscat, Oman: Department of Marine Science and Fisheries,
Sultan Qaboos University.
Jabado R.W., Al Ghais S.M., Hamza W. and Henderson A.C. (2014a)
The shark fishery in the United Arab Emirates: an interview based
approach to assess the status of sharks. Aquatic Conservation:
Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, doi: 10.1002/aqc.2477.
Jabado R.W., Al Ghais S.M., Hamza W., Henderson A.C. and Shivji
M.S. (2014b) Shark diversity in the Arabian/Persian Gulf higher
than previously thought: insights based on species composition of
shark landings in the United Arab Emirates. Marine Biodiversity,
doi: 10.1007/s12526-014-0275-7.
Jabado R.W., Al Ghais S.M., Hamza W., Henderson A.C., Spaet J.L.Y.,
Shivji M.S. and Hanner R. (2015) The trade in sharks and their
products in the United Arab Emirates. Biological Conservation 181,
190– 198.
Kumar A.K.V., Khanolkar P.S., Pravin P., Meenakumari B. and
Radhakrishnan E.V. (2012) First record of the pelagic thresher
shark Alopias pelagicus (Pisces: Alopiiformes: Alopidae) from the
Lakshadweep Sea, India. Marine Biodiversity Records 5, e16, doi:
10.1017/S1755267211001114.
Kumar A.K.V., Khanolkar P.S., Pravin P., Meenakumari B. and
Radhakrishnan E.V. (2013) First record of the grey reef shark
Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos (Bleeker, 1856) (Carcharhiniformes:
Carcharhinidae) from the Lakshadweep Sea, India. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 5, 35803582.
McElroy D.W., Wetherbee B.M., Mostello C.S., Lowe C.G., Crow G.L.
and Wass R.C. (2006) Food habits and ontogenetic changes in the
diet of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in Hawaii.
Environmental Biology of Fishes 76, 8192.
Musick J.A., Stevens J.D., Baum J.K., Bradai M., Clo
`S., Fergusson I.,
Grubbs R.D., Soldo A., Vacchi M. and Vooren C.M. (2009)
Carcharhinus plumbeus.The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species,
version 2014.3. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 27 April
2015).
National Marine Fisheries Service (1991) The shark tagger. Annual
Report of the NMFS Cooperative Shark Tagging Program. Apex
Predators Program, Narragansett, Rhode Island, 14 pp. In: Merson R.
and Pratt H.L. Jr. (2001) Distribution, movements and growth of
young sandbar sharks, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in the nursery
grounds of Delaware Bay. Environmental Biology of Fishes 61, 13 –24.
Pillai P.P. and Parakkal B. (2000) Pelagic sharks in the Indian Seas—their
exploitation, trade, management and conservation. CMFRI Special
Publication, no. 70, 95 pp.
Sen S., Dash G. and Bharadiya S.A. (2014) First record of blue-spotted
stingray Neotrygon kuhlii from Gujarat, north-west coast of India.
Marine Biodiversity Records 7, e81, doi: 10.1017/S1755267214000852.
Spaet J.L.Y. and Berumen M.L. (2015) Fish market surveys indicate
unsustainable elasmobranch fisheries in the Saudi Arabian Red Sea.
Fisheries Research 161, 356364.
Stevens J.D. and McLoughlin K.J. (1991) Distribution, size and sex com-
position, reproductive biology and diet of sharks from Northern
Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 42, 151 199.
and
White W.T. (2007) Catch composition and reproductive biology of
whaler sharks (Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) caught by fisher-
ies in Indonesia. Journal of Fish Biology 71, 15121540.
Correspondence should be addressed to:
R.W. Jabado
Gulf Elasmo Project
P.O. Box 29588, Dubai, UAE
email: rimajabado@hotmail.com
first record of sandbar shark in indian waters 3
... It comprised less than 1% of total elasmobranch landings by number in the Saudi Arabian Red Sea and in the shark landings of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Berumen 2015, Jabado et al. 2016). It represented 3% of sharks by number transported from Oman and traded in the UAE (Jabado et al. 2015). The Sandbar Shark was only recently confirmed from landings in India (Sutaria et al. 2015) and Sri Lanka (De Silva 2006). ...
... It represented 3% of sharks by number transported from Oman and traded in the UAE (Jabado et al. 2015). The Sandbar Shark was only recently confirmed from landings in India (Sutaria et al. 2015) and Sri Lanka (De Silva 2006). Fisheries in the Arabian Seas region have experienced increased demand for sharks since the 1970s due to the shark fin trade and as a result, effort is increasing in traditional shark fisheries in many areas (Henderson et al. 2007, Jabado et al. 2015. ...
... The Sandbar Shark was only recently confirmed from landings in India (Sutaria et al. 2015) and Sri Lanka (De Silva 2006). Fisheries in the Arabian Seas region have experienced increased demand for sharks since the 1970s due to the shark fin trade and as a result, effort is increasing in traditional shark fisheries in many areas (Henderson et al. 2007, Jabado et al. 2015. Simultaneously, there has been a significant increase in coastal fishing effort and power in some parts of the Arabian Seas region leading to a reduction in the number of shark catches with a population decline of 50-79% suspected for the Sandbar Shark over the past three generation lengths (78 years) (Jabado et al. 2017). ...
... Our assessment identified 31 species of elasmobranchs from 157 specimens collected in just 38 days. The survey complements global and regional FAO, 2019) efforts at chondrichthyan status assessments and the very few scientific investigations into elasmobranch biodiversity, distribution, and fisheries in India (Raje and Zacharia, 2009;Akhilesh et al., 2014;Bineesh et al., 2017;Jabado et al., 2018;Kumar et al., 2018;Pradeep et al., 2018), and Gujarat (Sutaria et al., 2015;Johri et al., 2019Johri et al., , 2020b. Among the elasmobranch species sampled in our study ∼39% are in the ICUN Threatened categories and ∼20% in the data deficient category. ...
Article
Full-text available
Chondrichthyes, an ancient and diverse class of vertebrates, are crucial to the health of marine ecosystems. Excessive demand for chondrichthyan products has increased fishing pressure, threatening ∼30% of species with extinction in recent decades. India is the second-largest shark landing nation globally and the province of Gujarat, is the largest contributor to its shark exports. Despite their significant contribution to global fish supplies, chondrichthyan fisheries in Gujarat remain understudied and many species, data deficient, posing challenges to the conservation of remaining populations in the region. Here, we report results from taxonomic assessment of elasmobranchs at four key landing sites in Gujarat. We identified thirty-one species of sharks and rays with a significant bias toward capture of females and juveniles by fisheries. Our data indicate the presence of nursery areas for species such as Sphyrna lewini and Rhynchobatus laevis in the neritic areas off Gujarat. Further, we discovered extensions of the current distribution range for three species -Torpedo sinuspersici, Carcharhinus sorrah, and Rhinobatos punctifer. Taxonomic identities for a subset of species were confirmed using genomic analyses conducted with portable DNA sequencing tools. We present assessments for six data deficient species in the region – Rhinobatos annandalei, Rhinoptera jayakari, Maculabatis bineeshi, Pateobatis bleekeri, T. sinuspersici, and Carcharhinus amboinensis. Our investigation underscores species with urgent conservation needs and reduces data deficiencies. These data will inform and pivot future scientific and conservation efforts to protect remaining populations of some of the most vulnerable Chondrichthyes in the Arabian Seas Region.
... respectively. This result was nearly similar in some parameters and lower or higher in other parameters in the result recorded at the same species from Southern Tyrrhenian Sea (Consoli et al., 2004) and Middle Adriatic Sea (Dragicevic et al., 2010 andSutaria et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
The present study aimed to provide an update on carcharhinid sharks (Family: Carcharhinidae) in the Egyptian Mediterranean waters, based on the differences in morphological features of the body. A total of 36 specimens of carcharhinid sharks belong to 7 species of family Carcharhinidae were seasonally collected from the commercial catch at land fish market in Alexandria of Mediterranean Sea, during the period from May 2017 to June 2018. Morphometric characters were recorded for each specimen. Many photos had been captured for each shark specimen and processed by Image J software for calculating different ratios of morphological aspects for shark’s body. Results showed that seven species belonging to the family Carcharhinidae (Carcharhinus altimus, C. brachyurus, C. brevipinna, C. falciformis, C. obscurus, C. plumbeus and Prionace glauca) were found to inhibit the Egyptian Mediterranean waters at Alexandria. Four of them were firstly recorded in the Egyptian Mediterranean waters (i.e. C. brachyurus, C. falciformis, C. obscurus and Prionace glauca. Our study was attempted to add some morphometric characters for the identification of studied species. Statistical analysis of morphometric ratios showed significant differences between investigated species (P<0.05), revealing its capability as classifying tool.
... The waters of India harbour an estimated 114 shark species (Akhilesh et al. 2014, Sutaria et al. 2015) from more than 500 globally known species (Weigmann 2016), of which 47 have been reported from the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago (hereafter referred to as 'the archipelago') ( Table 1, Rajan et al. 2012, Rajan et al. 2016, Pradeep et al. 2017a, Pradeep et al. 2017b). Seen as a fishery resource to be exploited, much shark research effort in mainland India has focused on catch effort and landing volumes (Akhilesh et al. 2014. ...
Article
Full-text available
The diversity of sharks occurring off the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago in India has received increased attention in recent years. Yet, available checklists are out of date, often with inaccurate information and a number of commercially important species have not been documented through research and fish landing surveys. Here we report on shark species examined during fish landing surveys conducted from January 2017 to April 2018. Records of twelve previously unreported species from the archipelago are presented and include the bignose shark (Carcharhinus altimus), pigeye shark (Carcharhinus amboinensis), bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas), snaggletooth shark (Hemipristis elongata), slender weasel shark (Paragaleus randalli), Arabian smoothhound shark (Mustelus mosis), Indonesian houndshark (Hemitriakis indroyonoi), sand tiger shark (Carcharias taurus), Indonesian bambooshark (Chiloscyllium hasseltii), tawny nurse shark (Nebrius ferrugineus), dwarf gulper shark (Centrophorus atromarginatus), and the Indonesian shortsnout spurdog (Squalus hemipinnis). These records increase the reported shark species for the archipelago from 47 to 59 and for India from 114 to 116. Additionally, a size extension in the total length of C. hasseltii by 27 cm and of P. randalli by 8 cm is reported. Owing to the bio-geographical location of these islands, species diversity around the archipelago is unique and appears to overlap with that of southeast Asia. With increasing reports of over-exploitation and the operation of a targeted shark fishery by distant water fleets in these waters, the limited information on shark diversity from this region is of concern. Systematic and long-term monitoring of catches, combined with accurate species identification, is crucial to provide information on management measures.
... Nevertheless, elasmobranchs found in Indian waters have been catalogued by several researchers (Day, 1889;Misra, 1952Misra, , 1969Raje et al., 2007;Talwar & Kacker, 1984). In recent years, several species have been added to the list (Akhilesh et al., 2010(Akhilesh et al., , 2013aBineesh et al., 2014, Babu et al., 2011Soundararajan & Roy 2004;Sutaria et al., 2015). An updated and extended checklist of 227 chondrichthyan species reported/listed as occurring in Indian waters, put together by Akhilesh et al. (2014), suggested that 27 species (12%) had questionable status in India and another 41 species (18%) required additional confirmation with regard to their occurrence suggested there is an urgent need for a re-assessment of chondrichthyan diversity in Indian waters. ...
Article
DNA barcoding was successfully used for the accurate identification of chondrichthyans in the Indian commercial marine fishery. About 528 specimens of 111 chondrichthyan species and 34 families, collected from the Indian EEZ, were barcoded for a 655 bp region of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI). Generally, five specimens per species were barcoded, but numbers ranged from 2 to 13. The average Kimura 2 parameter (K2P) distance separating individuals within species was 0.32%, and the average distance separating species within genera was 6.73%. Ten species were suggested as putative new species requiring formal descriptions. Based on the morphology and molecular support, 11 elasmobranch species were confirmed first records for Indian waters. The present study confirms the ability of DNA barcoding for the accurate identification of sharks, rays, and their products from Indian waters.
... Nevertheless, elasmobranchs found in Indian waters have been catalogued by several researchers (Day, 1889;Misra, 1952Misra, , 1969Raje et al., 2007;Talwar & Kacker, 1984). In recent years, several species have been added to the list (Akhilesh et al., 2010(Akhilesh et al., , 2013aBineesh et al., 2014, Babu et al., 2011Soundararajan & Roy 2004;Sutaria et al., 2015). An updated and extended checklist of 227 chondrichthyan species reported/listed as occurring in Indian waters, put together by Akhilesh et al. (2014), suggested that 27 species (12%) had questionable status in India and another 41 species (18%) required additional confirmation with regard to their occurrence suggested there is an urgent need for a re-assessment of chondrichthyan diversity in Indian waters. ...
Article
Full-text available
Historically India has been projected as one of the major elasmobranch fishing nations in the world. However, management and conservation efforts are not commensurate with this trend. Along with the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, several generic conservation measures are in place at the regional/local level. But India is still a long way from meeting global conservation commitments. We present here the status of elasmobranch management and conservation in India, with the specific objective of identifying the gaps in the existing setup. We also present recommendations based on a national consultative workshop held at Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI), Kochi, India in February 2020. We recommend the implementation of a National Plan of Action (NPOA-Sharks) and more inclusive governance and policymaking for elasmobranch conservation in India.
Article
Present study consists rare batoids from north-eastern Arabian Sea. A specimen of Dasyatis microps (101.0 cm DW) and Pteroplatytrygon violacea (49.5 cm DW) respectively were collected in a trawler, operating south off Mumbai in the Arabian Sea, north-west coast of India. The present record of these elasmobranchs from the northern Arabian Sea shows their extended range of occurrence around the Indian coast, which is earlier reported from south-east and south-west coast of India. The morphometric measurements of the specimens collected were compared with previous records. In the same fishing area, pregnant Rhynchobatus djiddensis (254.0 cm TL) and a juvenile R. djiddensis (44.0 cm TL) was also caught in shallow coastal waters at 40 m depth. Biological observations on Dasyatis microps and Rhynchobatus djiddensis also presented. © 2018, National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources (NISCAIR). All rights reserved.
Book
Full-text available
This report provides an overview of the con- servation status of chondrichthyans (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) in the Arabian Seas Region (ASR) and describes the results of a regional Red List workshop held in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, in February 2017. It identies those species that are threatened with extinction at the regional level, so that appropriate conservation action can be taken to improve their status. A regional overview of chondrichthyan fisheries, management and conservation is also presented. Although 184 species of sharks, rays, and chimaeras occur in the ASR, only the confirmed 153 species were considered in this project.The geographic scope encompasses the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea, Sea of Oman and the Gulf.This includes the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of 20 countries bordering three Large Marine Ecosystems (i.e., the Arabian Sea, Red Sea, and Somali Current). This region comprises some of the largest and most important chondrichthyan fishing nations in the world, including India and Pakistan. All assessments followed the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 3.1 and the Guidelines for Application of the IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels Version 4.0. During the workshop, a network of leading international and regional experts on chondrichthyans and fisheries compiled data and knowledge to prepare 30 global (endemic species) and 123 regional species assessments. All assessments were agreed on by consensus at the workshop and any changes to statuses during the review process were agreed on through email correspondence with lead assessors and contributors prior to their submission to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and inclusion in this report.
Chapter
Given long generation times and relatively slow reproductive rates, elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) are particularly prone to overexploitation. The unrelenting demand for shark products is unsustainable and many shark fisheries are collapsing. Because of the urgency of addressing this situation, this book concludes with an overview of how DNA-based tools are being deployed for the identification of shark products in commercial trade and summarize the relevance of this information for conservation and management. Advances in reference sequence library construction, population-level identification methods, and instrumentation platforms, together with declining costs of conducting molecular diagnostic tests, will enhance the uptake of these tools for seafood authentication and traceability. However, as this text has demonstrated, they are already improving our ability to monitor patterns of exploitation and yield greater transparency in the industry. The results highlight the urgency of enforcing existing regulations and promoting additional measures to conserve the world's shark fisheries.
Article
Full-text available
The sixgill sting ray Hexatrygon bickelli Heemstra and Smith,1980 was recorded from south-west coast of India for the first time, based on a single specimen caught during the regular demersal fishery resource survey conducted by Fishery Survey of India in the area of lat. 10° 44.3’ N, long. 74°14.7’ E at 508 m depth. The present specimen identified has seven gill slits on the right side instead of six gill slits reported for other Hexatrygon species Keywords: Batoid ray, Hexatrygon blickelli, Sixgill sting ray, South-east coast
Article
Full-text available
Although fish fauna in the Arabian/Persian Gulf have been studied for decades, shark diversity has only been recently investigated in the region. Here, we present a first comprehensive account of shark diversity from the United Arab Emirates based on fishery-dependent data collected at market and landing sites over a two-year period of field sampling. Landings across the country were dominated by carcharhinids, and six species were found to be most abundant, including the spot-tail shark, Carcharhinus sorrah, and the milk shark, Rhizoprionodon acutus, contributing 31.8 % and 29.9 %, respectively, of the total number of sharks. While observed landings varied among regions and across seasons, results showed that shark landings were dominated by small-sized species, which may be a reflection of overexploitation. We are now expanding the existing checklist of shark species in the Persian Gulf from 27 to 31, having utilized both morphological identification and genetic barcoding in validating the existence of the grey bamboo shark, Chiloscyllium griseum; the tawny nurse shark, Nebrius ferrugineus; the silky shark, Carcharhinus falciformis; and the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in these waters. This inventory provides an urgently needed assessment of current regional diversity patterns that can now be used as a baseline for future investigations evaluating the effect of fisheries on shark populations. Results emphasize the need for research on life history traits of the various species in order to determine their regional conservation status, but also reveal that a precautionary approach to conservation will be necessary to mitigate anthropogenic impacts.
Article
Full-text available
Conservation, management and sustainable utilisation of biological resources depend on the accurate identification of exploited taxa, which emphasises the need for systematic taxonomic research. Chondrichthyans (sharks, rays, skates and chimaeras) are considered to be one of the most vulnerable exploited marine resources, however, the basic taxonomic study of these groups in Indian waters needs improvement to achieve better management for their sustainable exploitation. We discuss issues concerning chondrichthyan taxonomic research in India and provide an extended, updated checklist of 155 chondrichthyans listed/reported from Indian waters, together with comments on their occurrence.
Article
Full-text available
One female specimen of blue-spotted stingray, Neotrygon kuhlii was collected from a single day trawl catch along with other species of rays from the Saurashtra coast of Gujarat, India. The present paper describes the first record of the blue-spotted stingray from the State of Gujarat, thereby adding another species to the total recorded species list from the area.
Article
Full-text available
The present paper reports and confirms the occurrence of Rhynchobatus australiae Whitley, 1939, Dasyatis microps Annandale (1908), Himantura granulata (Macleay, 1883), Aetomylaeus vespertilio (Bleeker, 1852) in the Arabian Sea coast of India and an extension of from their known distribution range by mitochondrial DNA (COI) analysis based on specimens/tissues collected from southwest coast of India. The obtained 640 bp COI sequence fragments perfectly matched with specific sequences available on the Barcode of Life Data (BOLD) system database
Article
Anecdotal evidence suggests that sharks are being targeted in the United Arab Emirates artisanal fishery. However, little information is available on this fishery and baseline information is essential for understanding its impact on shark populations in the Arabian/Persian Gulf, and for managing sharks in this region. The aim of this study was to investigate the artisanal shark fishery and gain an insight into the social, motivational and economic drivers behind it. Fishery characteristics were examined and the effect of fishing on local shark stocks assessed by interviewing Emirati fishermen across the country (n = 126). Sharks were found to be increasingly targeted owing to their high value in the global fin trade industry. The majority of fishermen (80%) confirmed that changes in species composition, abundance and sizes of sharks have been continuing for more than two decades, mainly because of overfishing, raising concerns about the sustainability of this fishery. Results suggest that sharks are likely to be overexploited and that management measures will need to take into account the precautionary principle. There is an urgent need to formulate long‐term and effective conservation and management plans to prevent further declines in a number of species. Additional efforts should be directed to quantify the ecological implications of the observed changes and determine if these are aggravated by the life‐history traits of the fished species. Such implications should be considered when assessing the sustainability of local fisheries. The data gathered can now serve as a reference to managers, fisheries scientists and other stakeholders to prioritize future research as well as lay foundations for the development and implementation of national management plans for the protection and conservation of sharks. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.