ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

We consider the modulus of noncompact convexity ∆X,ϕ(ε) associated with the minimalizable measure of noncompactness ϕ. We present some properties of this modulus, while the main result of this paper is showing that ∆X,ϕ(ε) is a subhomogenous and continuous function on [0, (BX)) for an arbitrary minimalizable measure of compactness ϕ in the case of a Banach space X with the Radon-Nikodym property.
Functional Analysis,
Approximation and
Computation
7 (3) (2015), 39–46
Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics,
University of Niˇ
s, Serbia
Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/faac
Continuity of modulus of noncompact convexity for minimalizable
measures of noncompactness
Amra Reki´c-Vukovi´ca, Nermin Okiˇci´cb, Vedad Paˇsi´cc, Ivan Arandjelovi´cd
aDepartment of Mathematics University of Tuzla Univerzitetska 4 75000 Tuzla Bosnia and Herzegovina
bDepartment of Mathematics University of Tuzla Univerzitetska 4 75000 Tuzla Bosnia and Herzegovina
cDepartment of Mathematics University of Tuzla Univerzitetska 4 75000 Tuzla Bosnia and Herzegovina
dFaculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Belgrade Kraljice Marije 16 11000 Belgrade Serbia
Abstract. We consider the modulus of noncompact convexity X(ε) associated with the minimalizable
measure of noncompactness ϕ. We present some properties of this modulus, while the main result of
this paper is showing that X(ε) is a subhomogenous and continuous function on [0,(BX)) for an arbitrary
minimalizable measure of compactness ϕin the case of a Banach space Xwith the Radon-Nikodym property.
1. Introduction
One of the basic concepts of geometry of Banach spaces is that of uniform convexity, introduced by
Clarkson [3]. Smulian [11] characterized the property dual to uniform convexity, i.e. uniform smoothness
and pointed out that uniform convexity and uniform smoothness describe geometric properties of finite
dimensional subspaces of a normed space. Most of the problems in fixed point theory, however, have global
character, which was the motivation for considering infinite dimensional counterparts of classical geometric
notions. One of these is nearly uniformconvexity introduced by Huin [7]. Goebel and Sekowski [6] define
the modulus corresponding to nearly uniform convexity and use the concept of measure of noncompactness
to give a new classification of Banach spaces. They prove that whenever the characteristic of uniform
noncompact convexity of any Banach space is less than 1, the space is reflexive and has normal structure.
1.1. Fundamental concepts and definitions
In this paper Xdenotes the Banach space, B(x,r) an open ball centred at xof radius r,BXthe unit ball
and SXthe unit sphere in X. If AXwe denote by Athe closure of a set Aand by coA the convex envelope
of A.
Definition 1.1. Let Bbe a family of bounded subsets of X. We call the mapping ϕ:B → [0,+)the measure of
noncompactness defined on X if it satisfies the following :
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 46B20, 46B22.
Keywords. Modulus of noncompact convexity; measure of noncompactness.
Received: 29 May 2015; Accepted: 9 July 2015
Communicated by Dragan S. Djordjevi´
c
Email addresses: amra.rekic@untz.ba (Amra Reki ´
c-Vukovi´
c), nermin.okicic@untz.ba (Nermin Okiˇ
ci´
c), vedad.pasic@untz.ba
(Vedad Paˇ
si´
c), iarandjelovic@mas.bg.ac.rs (Ivan Arandjelovi´
c)
A. Reki´c-Vukovi´c et al. /FAAC 7 (3) (2015), 39–46 40
1. ϕ(B)=0B is a relatively compact set;
2. ϕ(B)=ϕ(B),B∈ B
3. ϕ(B1B2)=max{ϕ(B1), ϕ(B2)},B1,B2∈ B.
Some of well known measures of noncompactness are Kuratowski measure (α), Hausdormeasure (χ) and Istratescu
measure (β), see e.g. [5], [8] and [12]. We call a measure of noncompactness ϕaminimalizable measure of
noncompactness if for every infinite bounded set A and for every ε > 0there exists its subset B A which is
ϕ-minimal and such that ϕ(B)ϕ(A)ε.
A measure ϕis a strictly minimalizable measure of noncompactness if for every infinite, bounded set A there
exists its subset B A which is ϕ-minimal and such that ϕ(B)=ϕ(A).
Remark 1.2. Clearly every strictly minimalizable measure is a minimalizable measure of noncompactness. See e.g.
[8] and [5] for more on measures of noncompactness.
Definition 1.3. A modulus of noncompact convexity associated with an arbitrary measure of noncompactness ϕis
a function X: [0, ϕ(BX)] [0,1] given by
X(ε)=inf{1d(0,A) : ABX,A=coA =A, ϕ(A)> ε}.
Banas [4] considered a modulus X(ε) for ϕ=χ, where χis the Hausdormeasure of noncompactness.
For ϕ=α, where αis a Kuratowski measure of noncompactness, X(ε) represents the Goebel-Sekowski
modulus of noncompact convexity, see [6].
For ϕ=β, where βis the separation measure of noncompactness, X(ε) represents the Dominguez-Lopez
modulus of noncompact convexity, see [10].
Definition 1.4. We define the characteristic of noncompact convexity of X associated with a measure of noncompact-
ness ϕby
εϕ(X)=sup{ε0 : X(ε)=0}.
For moduli X(ε) with respect to ϕ=α, χ, β we have the following inequalities:
X(ε)X(ε)X(ε),
and hence
εα(X)εβ(X)εχ(X).
It is known that Xis nearly uniformly convex (NUC) if and only if εϕ(X)=0, for ϕ=α, χ, β, see e.g. [5].
Banas [4] showed that the modulus X(ε) in the case of a reflexive space Xis a subhomogenous
function continuous on [0,1). Prus [9] gave a result which links the continuity of the modulus X(ε)
with the uniform Opial condition which implies the normal structure of the space. In [1] we demonstrated
certain properties of the modulus X(ε) as well as its continuity for a strictly minimalizable measure of
noncompactness ϕon Banach spaces with the Radon-Nikodym property.
Definition 1.5. We say that the Banach space X is with the Radon-Nikodym property if and only if every nonempty
bounded subset A X is dentable, i.e. if and only if for all ε > 0, exists x A, such that x <co(A\B(x, ε)), see e.g.
[13].
The aim of this paper is to show that the modulus X(ε) is a subhomogenous and continuous function
on [0, ϕ(BX)) for an arbitrary minimalizable measure of compactness ϕin the case of a Banach space Xwith
the Radon-Nikodym property.
Structure of paper. This paper has the following structure. Section 1 provides the background infor-
mation and the fundamental concepts and definitions. Section 2 contains several results which provide the
properties of the Xmodulus. Section 3 contains the main result of the paper, namely the result on the
continuity of the modulus X. Section 4 contains the discussion of the obtained results.
A. Reki´c-Vukovi´c et al. /FAAC 7 (3) (2015), 39–46 41
2. Xmodulus properties
Theorem 2.1. Let X be a Banach space with Radon-Nikodym property and let ϕbe a minimalizable measure of
noncompactness. The modulus X(ε)is a subhomogenous function, i.e. we have that for all k [0,1] and for all
ε[0, ϕ(BX)]
X(kε)kX(ε).
Proof. Let η > 0 be arbitrary and ε[0, ϕ(BX)]. By definition 1.3 there exists a convex closed subset ABX,
ϕ(A)> ε such that
1d(0,A)<X(ε)+η .
For arbitrary k[0,1] the set kA BXis convex and closed. Hence we have that ϕ(kA)=kϕ(A)>kε.
As ϕis a minimalizable measure, for δ=ϕ(kA)kε
2>0 there exists an infinite ϕ-minimal set BkA,
such that
ϕ(B)ϕ(kA)δ ,
i.e. ϕ(B)>kε. From the Radon-Nikodym property of the space X, for ε > 0 there exists x0Bsuch that
x0<co B\Bx0,ε
2 .
If we define the set B=C+1k
x0x0, where C=co B\Bx0,ε
2, then
1d(0,B)<k(X(ε)+η).(1)
The set BBXis closed and convex and we have that ϕ(B)=ϕ(C)=ϕ(B)>kε. If we take the infimum
over all the sets B,ϕ(B)>kε, in inequality (1) we get that
X(kε)k(X(ε)+η),
which proves the theorem due to η > 0 being arbitrary.
Several additional properties of the modulus Xarise from Theorem 2.1.
Lemma 2.2. Let ϕbe a minimalizable measure of noncompactness defined on a Banach space X with the Radon-
Nikodym property. Then the modulus X(ε)is a strictly increasing function on [εϕ(X), ϕ(BX)].
Proof. Let ε1,ε2[εϕ(X), ϕ(BX)] and ε1< ε2. If we put k=ε1
ε2
<1, using Theorem 2.1 we have that
X(ε1)= ∆X(kε2)kX(ε2)<X(ε2).
Lemma 2.3. Let ϕbe a minimalizable measure of noncompactness defined on a Banach space X with the Radon-
Nikodym property. For every ε[0, ϕ(BX)] we have that
X(ε)ε .
A. Reki´c-Vukovi´c et al. /FAAC 7 (3) (2015), 39–46 42
Proof. If ε[0,1], then using Theorem 2.1, switching the roles of kand εaround and putting ε=1, we have
that
X(ε)εX(1) ε .
If ε(1, ϕ(BX)], then due to monotonicity of the modulus X(ε) we have that
X(ε)<X(ϕ(BX)) =1< ε .
Lemma 2.4. Let ϕbe a minimalizable measure of noncompactness defined on a Banach space X with the Radon-
Nikodym property. Then the function f (ε)=
X(ε)
εis nondecreasing on [0, ϕ(BX)] and for ε1+ε2ϕ(BX)we
have that
X(ε1+ε2)X(ε1)+ ∆X(ε2).(2)
Proof. Let ε1,ε2[0, ϕ(BX)] be such that ε1ε2. Putting k=ε1
ε2
, we get that
f(ε1)=
X(ε1)
ε1
=
X(kε2)
ε1
.
Using the subhomogeneity of the function X(ε) we have that
f(ε1)
X(ε2)
ε2
=f(ε2),
which shows that f(ε) is a nondecreasing function on [0, ϕ(BX)]. We also have that
X(ε1)+ ∆X(ε2)kX(ε2)+ ∆X(ε2)
=ε1+ε2
ε2
X(ε2)
(ε1+ε2)
X(ε1+ε2)
ε1+ε2
= ∆X(ε1+ε2),
which shows inequality (2).
Lemma 2.5. Let ϕbe a minimalizable measure of noncompactness on a Banach space X with the Radon-Nikodym
property. Then for all ε1, ε2(ε1(X), ϕ(BX)], such that ε1ε2, we have that
X(ε2)X(ε1)
ε2ε1
X(ε2)
ε2
.(3)
Proof. Let k=ε1
ε21. Using Theorem 2.1 we get that
X(ε2)X(ε1)= ∆X(ε2)X(kε2)
X(ε2)kX(ε2)
=ε2ε1
ε2
X(ε2),
which shows the inequality (3).
A. Reki´c-Vukovi´c et al. /FAAC 7 (3) (2015), 39–46 43
3. The continuity of the modulus of noncompact convexity
The main result of this paper is the following
Theorem 3.1. Let ϕbe a minimalizable measure of noncompactness and let X be a Banach space with the Radon-
Nikodym property. Then the modulus of noncompact convexity X(ε)is a continuous function on [0, ϕ(BX)).
The proof of Theorem 3.1 follows from two lemmas that deal with the continuity of the modulus X(ε)
from below and above respectively, i.e. Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 3.3.
Lemma 3.2. Let ϕbe a minimalizable measure of compactness and let X be a Banach space with the Radon-Nikodym
property. Then the modulus of noncompact convexity X(ε)is a continuous function from below on [0, ϕ(BX)).
Proof. Let ε0[0, ϕ(BX)) be arbitrary and let ε < ε0. By Definition 1.3, for arbitrary η > 0 there exists a
convex and closed subset ABX,ϕ(A)> ε such that
1d(0,A)<X(ε)+η .
If ϕ(A)ε0> ε, then clearly
inf{1d(0,A) : A=coA,ABX, ϕ(A)ε0} ≤ X(ε)+η ,
i.e.
X(ε0)X(ε)+η ,
whence, due to η > 0 being arbitrary, we complete the proof. Therefore, let ε < ϕ(A)< ε0and γ=ε0ϕ(A)>
0. Since the measure of noncompactness ϕis minimalizable, for arbitrary γ > 0, there exists an infinite
ϕ-minimal subset BAsuch that
ϕ(B)ϕ(A)γ=2ϕ(A)ε0.
Let n0Nbe such that 2ϕ(A)ε0
n0
<diamB
2. Since BBXis a bounded subset of the space Xwith the
Radon-Nikodym property, for r=2ϕ(A)ε0
n0
there exists x0Bsuch that
x0<co B\B(x0,r).
Let C=co B\B(x0,r). The set CBis convex and closed and we have that 1 d(0,C)1d(0,B)
1d(0,A)<X(ε)+η. Besides, since Bis a ϕ-minimal set, we have that
ϕ(C)=ϕ(B)2ϕ(A)ε0.
Let k=1+1d(0,C)
2and let us look at the set A=kC BX.Ais closed and convex and we have that
AkC kB and hence
1d(0,A)1d(0,kC)<1d(0,C)<X(ε)+η .
Since Bis ϕ-minimal so is kB and hence
ϕ(A)=ϕ(kB)=kϕ(B)k(2ϕ(A)ε0).
Put δ=ε0
211
k. Then for arbitrary ε(ε0δ, ε0) we have that
ϕ(A)k(2εε0)>k(2(ε0δ)ε0)=ε0.
A. Reki´c-Vukovi´c et al. /FAAC 7 (3) (2015), 39–46 44
Therefore
inf{1d(0,A) : ABX,A=coA, ϕ(A)> ε0} ≤ X(ε)+η
and hence
X(ε0)X(ε)+η ,
whence due to η > 0 being arbitrary, we have that
lim
εε0
X(ε)= ∆X(ε0).
Lemma 3.3. Let ϕbe a minimalizable measure of noncompactness and let X be a Banach space with the Radon-
Nikodym property. Then the modulus of noncompact convexity X(ε)is a function continuous from above on
[0, ϕ(BX)).
Proof. Let η > 0 and ε0[0, ϕ(BX)). By definition 1.3 there exists a convex and closed subset ABX,
ϕ(A)> ε0, such that
1d(0,A)<X(ε0)+η .
Since the measure of noncompactness ϕis minimalizable, for arbitrary γ > 0, there exists an infinite ϕ-
minimal subset BA, such that ϕ(B)ϕ(A)γ. Let n0Nbe such that ϕ(A)γ
n0
<diamB
2. Using the
Radon-Nikodym property of Xfor the set Band r=ϕ(A)γ
n0
, there exists x0Bsuch that
x0<co B\B(x0,r).
In this case the set C=co B\B(x0,r)is a convex and closed subset of the set Bfor which we have
1d(0,C)<X(ε0)+η
and
ϕ(C)=ϕ(B)ϕ(A)γ .
Let k=1+1d(0,C)
2. The set A=kC BXis a convex and closed set such that
1d(0,A)<X(ε0)+η ,
and ϕ(A)=ϕ(kB)=kϕ(B)k(ϕ(A)γ).
Let ε2ε0
3d(0,C), ε0be arbitrary and let γ=ε0ε. Using the above, there exists a subset BAsuch
that
ϕ(B)ϕ(A)ε0+ε> ε.
Hence for the set Awe have that
ϕ(A)=kϕ(B)>kε.
A. Reki´c-Vukovi´c et al. /FAAC 7 (3) (2015), 39–46 45
If we choose δ=kεε0, then for an arbitrary ε(ε0, ε0+δ) we have that
ϕ(A)>kε> ε .
Therefore
inf{1d(0,A) : ABX,A=coA, ϕ(A)> ε} ≤ X(ε0)+η ,
i.e.
lim
εε0+
X(ε)= ∆X(ε0).
4. Discussion
It is known that the separation measure of noncompactness βis a minimalizable measure on a complete
metric space. Therefore it is minimalizable on Banach spaces with the Radon-Nikodym property. Using
Theorem 3.1 we can conclude that the modulus X(ε) with respect to the separation measure βis a
continuous function on [0, ϕ(BX)) for a Banach space Xwith the Radon-Nikodym property. For example,
since the spaces lpand Lp(1 <p<+) are reflexive, they are with Radon-Nikodym property. Therefore
lp(ε) and Lp (ε) are continuous functions on 0, ϕ Blpand 0, ϕ BLprespectively.
The Kuratowski measure of noncompactness αis not minimalizable on spaces lp(1 <p<+). Indeed,
if αwas minimalizable on these spaces, then for ε0,2n
21
n
2(nN) and for Blp, there would exist an
α-minimal set ABlpsuch that α(A)α(Blp)ε=2ε. Since every α-minimal set is also β-minimal and
because α(A)=β(A) (see [5], Lemma III. 2.9), we have that
2εβ(A)β(Blp)=21
p.
Because of the choice of εthis would mean that p1, which is a contradiction with this choice of p.
Therefore, the measure of noncompactness αis strictly minimalizable on the space l1. Namely, since
β(A)=2χ(A) for an arbitrary bounded set Al1, see ([5], Corollary X.4.7), and the general property
χ(A)β(A)α(A)2χ(A)
holds, we conclude that α(A)=β(A)=2χ(A). Since l1is weakly compactly determined, see [2], the
Hausdormeasure of noncompactness χis strictly minimalizable on l1, which means that the measure α
is also strictly minimalizable on l1. Hence l1is the separable dual of the space c0, so it is a space with the
Radon-Nikodym property. Using Theorem 3.1 we conclude that l1(ε) is a continuous function on [0,2).
References
[1] A. Reki´
c-Vukovi´
c, N. Okiˇ
ci´
c, I. Arandjelovi´
c, On modulus of noncompact convexity for a strictly minimalizable measure of
noncompactness, Gulf Journal of Mathematics, 2 (3) (2014) 38-45.
[2] E. Maluta, S. Prus, Minimal sets for the Hausdormeasure of noncompactness and related coecients, Nonlinear Anal. (47)
(2001) 2753-2764.
[3] J.A. Clarkson, Uniformly convex spaces, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 40 (3) JSTOR (1936) 396-414.
[4] J. Banas, On modulus of noncompact convexity and its properties, Canad. Math. Bull. 30 (2) (1987) 186-192.
[5] J.M.A. Toledano, T.D. Benavides, G.L. Acedo, Measures of noncompactness in metric fixed point theory, Springer 99, 1997.
[6] K. Goebel, T. Sekowski, The modulus of noncompact convexity, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Sect. A 38 (1984) 41-48.
[7] R. Hu, Banach spaces which are nearly uniformly convex, Rocky Mountain J. Math 10 (4) (1980).
[8] R.R. Akhmerov, M.I. Kamenskii, A.S. Potapov, A.E. Rodkina, B.N. Sadovskii, Measures of noncompactness and condensing
operators, Birkh¨
auser, 1992.
A. Reki´c-Vukovi´c et al. /FAAC 7 (3) (2015), 39–46 46
[9] S. Prus, Banach spaces with the uniform Opial property, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, 18 (8) Elsevier
(1992) 697-704.
[10] T.D. Benavides, G.L. Acedo, Lower bounds for normal structure coecients, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh:
Section A Mathematics, 121 (3-4) Cambridge Univ. Press. (1992) 245-252.
[11] V.L. ˇ
Smulian, Sur la structure de la sphe’re unitaire dans l’espace de Banach, Matem. cb. 9 (51) (1941) 545-561.
[12] V. Rako ˇ
cevi´
c, Measures of noncompactness and some applications, Filomat 12:2 (1998) 87-120.
[13] W.J. Davis, R.R. Phelps, The Radon-Nikodym property and dentable sets in Banach spaces, Proceedings of the American
Mathematical Society 45 (1) (1974) 119-122.
... In this way we get the classification of Banach spaces and better connection with the theory of fixed point. We know some results for some properties of the modulus △ X,φ (ε) for an arbitrary (strictly) minimalizable measure of noncompactness φ and Banach space X with Radon-Nikodym property, as well as the result for continuity of the modulus △ X,φ (ε) [10], [11]. The result of the continuity was a consequence of the result that Prus gave connecting continuity of the modulus △ X,χ (ε) to the uniform Opial condition which implies normal structure of the space [7]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
In this article we introduce the new modulus X,ϕ(ε)\triangle'_{X,\phi}(\varepsilon), for which we prove that in the general case is different from the classical modulus of noncompact convexity. The main result of the paper is showing the continuity of the modulus of noncompact convexity for arbitrary minimalizable (strictly minimalizable) measure of noncompactness on arbitrary metric space.
... The above result was proved in [5,Theorem 3] for ∆ X,χ , and in [31] for ∆ X,µ , µ being a MNC satisfying certain properties. ...
Article
Based in the so called degree of nondensifiability, denoted by ϕ\phi, we introduce and analyze the concepts of modulus of nondensifiable convexity and the nearly uniform convexity characteristic of a given Banach space X associated to ϕ\phi, denoted by ΔXϕ\Delta_{X}^{\phi} and εϕ(X)\varepsilon^{\phi}(X), respectively. Although ϕ\phi is not a measure of noncompactness (MNC), we prove that ΔXϕ\Delta_{X}^{\phi} and εϕ(X)\varepsilon^{\phi}(X) are, respectively, a lower and upper bound for the modulus of noncompact convexity and the nearly uniform convexity characteristic of X associated to an arbitrary MNC. Also, we characterize the normal structure of X in terms of ϕ\phi and, by using εϕ(X)\varepsilon^{\phi}(X), we give a sufficient condition for X has the weak fixed point property.
... Diferencijalna geometrija je u centru mog istraživačkog rada -a iskreno se nadam da će neki od vas postati moje istraživačke kolegice NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 4 Uvod i kolege. Ako vas to interesuje, pogledajte moje radove iz ove i drugih oblasti [2,6,10,11,12,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,24]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This manuscript, titled Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces in Three-dimensional Euclidean Space, is intended for undergraduate students of mathematics and other sciences with the need of use of Euclidean differential geometry. We deal with the differential geometry of curves and surfaces in three dimensions, covering all the main definitions, ideas and concepts needed for successful understanding and further application of this fundamental branch of mathematics. Many concrete examples with solutions are given with illustrations. ----- Ova knjiga namijenjena je dodiplomskim studentima matematike i drugih nauka sa potrebom upotrebe euklidske diferencijalne geometrije. Upoznat \'cemo se sa diferencijalnom geometrijom krivih i povr\v{s}i u tri dimenzije, pokrivaju\'ci sve glavne definicije, ideje i koncepte potrebne za razumijevanje i uspje\v{s}nu dalju primjenu ove fundamentalne grane matematike. Dati su mnogi konkretni problemi sa rje\v{s}enjima i mno\v{s}tvom ilustracija.
Chapter
As we have seen in Chapter I, compactness plays an essential role in the proof of the Schauder fixed point theorem. However, there are some important problems where the operators are not compact.
Chapter
We shall study in this chapter the existence of fixed points for a different class of mappings, called asymptotically regular mappings. The concept of asymptotically regular mappings is due to Browder and Petryshyn [BP]. Some fixed point theorems for this class of mappings can be found in [Gr1], [Gr2] and references therein. The fixed point theorems which we shall study are based upon results in [DX]. As we shall see, there is a strong connection between these results and those in Chapter VIII. In particular, in some of them the role of the Clarkson modulus of convexity will be played by the moduli of near uniform convexity. In Section 1 we define a new geometric coefficient in Banach spaces which plays the role of the Lifshitz characteristic for asymptotically regular mappings, and we prove the corresponding version for these mappings of Theorem VIII.1.4. In Section 2 we study some relationships between the new coefficient and either the modulus of NUC or the weakly convergent sequence coefficient. We also find a simpler expression for the new coefficient in Banach spaces with the uniform Opial property. Moreover we prove that, in contrast to the Lifshitz characteristic, the new coefficient is easy to compute in l p-spaces. We recall that the Lifshitz characteristic is only known in some renorming of Hilbert spaces.
Article
In this paper we prove some properties of the so-called modulus of noncompact convexity. This notion was recently introduced by K. Goebel and T. Sȩkowski [6] and it appears to be an interesting and useful generalization of the classical Clarkson modulus of convexity. We extend the results obtained in [6] showing that the modulus of noncompact convexity is continuous and has some extra properties in reflexive Banach spaces. The properties applicable in the fixed point theory are also stated.
Article
A property which generalizes uniform convexity is defined in terms of sequences. Its relationships to uniform convexity and to weak and norm convergence on spheres are investigated.
Article
It is proved that every bounded infinite set in a weakly compactly determined Banach space contains a subset minimal for the Hausdorff measure of noncompactness whose measure is the same as the measure of the whole set. Various coefficients related to minimal sets are also studied.