To provide the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) with updated information
on the Hawaiian hawk (‘io, Buteo solitarius) for reconsideration of its current status
(endangered), I tested survey methodology, determined population size, distribution,
habitat availability, survival, fecundity, and finite rate of increase (λ) of ‘io during
1998 and 1999 on the island of Hawai‘i. I estimated the total population at 1,457 (SE
= 176.3) hawks. Birds were distributed broadly around the island, but highest
densities were found in mature native forest with a grass understory (0.0057 ‘io/ha). I
calculated that 58.7% of the island (614,405 ha) is useable habitat for ‘io. Of the
useable habitat, 31.8% (195,350 ha) is currently protected by State and Federal
forests, parks, and refuges. Based on an average density of 0.0024 ± 0.0008 ‘io/ha in
those areas, I calculated that protected areas currently support 469 ‘io (95% CI = 244-
901). I determined that the maximum number of ‘io found on the island prior to
human occupation was 1,313 (95% CI = 857-2,013). In all habitats combined, first
year and adult survival was 0.50 (SE = 0.0981) and 0.94 (SE = 0.0404), respectively.
In all habitats combined, fecundity was 0.23 (SE = 0.04) female young/breeding
female. Overall finite rate of increase (λ) was 1.0324 (SE = 0.0428). Elasticity
analyses showed adult survival as the most important parameter regulating finite
growth of this population. Based on current ‘io populations that are equal or larger in
size to populations prior to human contact, high adult survival, the protection of
substantial areas of habitat, a mean finite rate of increase ~ 1, resistance to avian
diseases found on the island, no evidence of negative impacts of contaminants, and
the birds ability to use human-altered landscapes and exotic prey, the population
appears viable. However, because of the short duration of this study, the relatively
low population size, the variance around my estimates, and environmental
stochasticity, I feel delisting is not warranted. I feel downlisting would be
appropriate for this species. Regardless of a change in listing, population size and
especially adult survivorship should be routinely monitored.