Content uploaded by Claudia Savina Bianchini
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Claudia Savina Bianchini on Aug 11, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Abstracts
www.icsla2015.nl
ICSLA 2015 Abstracts
15
Annotating sign language using a dedicated glyph system (the project Typannot)
Boutet, Doan, Danet, Bianchini, Renulard & Gogueli
Few systems are able to annotate sign language (SL) : Stokoe Notation System, HamNoSys,
SignWriting, BTS. Either they are based on symbols representing SL specific parameters — difficult
to write, or they are based on linear alpha numerical arbitrary encodings. The question of annotation
is widely debated and remains an essential requirement for linguistic analysis whether in the form of
ID-gloss or shape description. Typannot aims at giving better typographic tools by creating a
dedicated glyph system that allows users to annotate the SL parameters in an iconic way thanks to
the expertise of linguists, type designers and a roboticist.
We will present the concepts and the rules behind our glyphic system and show how we are able to
design 237 handshapes glyphs allowing their annotation in 10 SL (based on Eccarius & Brentari
2008). The components and the rules are limited, organized in order to maximize the system
economy and learning curve, both in writing and reading (G. Noordzij 2006).
This glyphic system can annotate the other manual parameters allowing combination of handshapes,
movements and location. The orientation can be deduced from information inscribed in each glyphic
unit. The design of this typeface is based at least on a graphematic description of a panel of 240 signs
(Bickford 2005) for 4 SL. Those three graphematic levels once unified in a common writing space
should open new perspectives in researching a writing system aimed at the deaf community. This
typographic system will reach a phonological level of representation in order to qualify as a viable
transcription of SL.
A low-cost motion capture system (Weichert et al 2013) will be used to enrich the glyphs adding
more information than configuration as speed, acceleration and orientation. We are also considering
the latest font format (OpenType) to allow dynamic font features like contextual glyph replacement.
References
Eccarius, Petra, et Diane Brentari. « Handshape coding made easier; A theoretically based notation
for phonological transcription ». Signe Language & Linguistics 11, no 1 (2008): 69-101.
Bickford, J. Albert. The signed languages of Eastern Europe. Citeseer, 2005.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.103.5039&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Weichert, Frank, Daniel Bachmann, Bartholomäus Rudak, et Denis Fisseler. « Analysis of the
Accuracy and Robustness of the Leap Motion Controller ». Sensors 13, no 5 (14 mai 2013): 6380-93.
doi:10.3390/s130506380.