... We envision that through using Rh(I) catalyst and appropriate chiral ligand, the reaction of 2-arylethenesulfonyl fluorides with arylboronic acids would furnish a class of novel chiral molecules bearing both chiral gem-diarylmethane moiety and sulfonyl fluoride functionality (Scheme 1). However, to the best of our knowledge, the asymmetric addition of organometallic reagents to α,βunsaturated sulfonyl fluorides for producing chiral β,β-diarylethanesulfonyl fluorides has not been divulged because there are two major challenges: first, the sulfonyl fluoride moiety (R-SO2F) is fragile in the presence of bases such as Et3N, NaHCO3, DBU to undergo nucleophilic reactions Chen et al., 2017Chen et al., , 2018Ungureanu et al., 2015), while for the Rh(I)-catalyzed 1,4-addition system, strong bases such as NaOH, KOH, CsOH, K2CO3 are typically required to drive the desired transformation to occur (Sidera and Fletcher, 2015;Tian et al., 2012;Edwards et al, 2010;Hayashi and Yamasaki, 2003;Fagnou and Lautens, 2003;Müller and Alexakis, 2012), which could partially or even completely destroy the S(VI)-F functionality; second, the -SO2F motif is much more electron-withdrawing comparing with other sulfonyl groups, carbonyl groups, phosphonates and nitro counterparties which makes the olefins conjugated with -SO2F a lot more (more than 100 times) reactive than alkenes conjugated with other electronwithdrawing groups, therefore, ethenesulfonyl fluoride performs as "perfect" Michael acceptor to proceed the addition in very short time Allgäuer et al., 2017) , which further makes the control of enantioselectivity a lot more challenging. ...